sign in sign up
<<
Home , Acetazolamide, Indapamide, List of sulfonamides, Loop diuretic, Sulfonamide, Sulfonamide (medicine)

From the Clinical Inquiries Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Ron Healy, MD University of Washington, Which are safe Seattle; Alaska Family Residency, Anchorage and effective for patients Terry Ann Jankowski, MLS University of Washington, Seattle with a sulfa allergy?

Evidence-based answer Diuretics that do not contain a subsequent allergic reactions to commonly group (eg, hydrochloride, used sulfonamide-containing diuretics , ethacrynic acid, , (eg, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, loop and ) are safe for patients with an diuretics, and ) (strength of allergy to sulfa. The evidence is contradictory recommendation: C, based on case series ® as to whether a history Dowdenof allergy to Healthand poor Media quality case-control and cohort sulfonamide increases the risk of studies). Copyright Clinical commentaryFor personal use only Are all sulfa drugs created equal? agents and off-patent, with no company Historical commonly fall by the to take up their cause, no one has been fast track wayside as better evidence becomes willing to challenge outdated package Reasonable available. Who would have thought 15 insert warnings. years ago that we would be promoting As clinicians who regularly work evidence supports beta-blockers for patients with congestive without a net, we are accustomed to what many of us ? prescribing in less than ideal are doing: Using likewise, with closer inspection, we circumstances. Thankfully, reasonable cheap thiazides have learned that not all sulfa drugs are evidence is available to support what many created equal. The stereospecificity due of us are already doing—using cheap for patients to the absence of aromatic in thiazides for patients despite a history of with a history common diuretics means they are safe sulfa allergy. for patients with known sulfa Brian Crownover, MD, FAAFP of sulfa allergy 96 MDG Family Medicine Residency, allergies. Given that diuretics are older Eglin Air Force Base, Fla

z Evidence summary , and ). Little research has been performed Hypersensitivity reactions occur when on sulfonamide antibiotic and sulfon- the aromatic group is oxidized allergic cross-reactivity. into hydroxylamine metabolites by the What we do know is that there are 2 liver. that do not contain classes of sulfonamides—those with an this aromatic amine group undergo dif- aromatic amine (the sul- ferent metabolic pathways, suggesting fonamides) and those without (eg, the that allergic reactions that do occur in diuretics , , this group are not due to cross-reactivity

488 vol 56, No 6 / june 2007 The Journal of Family Practice

For mass reproduction, content licensing and permissions contact Dowden Health Media. Diuretics for patients with sulfa allergy

in sulfa-allergic patients. But that point When the results were adjusted for is far from settled by the research. age, sex, history of asthma, use of medi- cations for asthma or corticosteroids, the On one side, a large cohort study adjusted odds ratio for individuals ex- shows some cross-reactivity periencing an allergy to a nonantibiotic A large retrospective cohort study us- sulfonamide in those persons with a his- ing Britain’s General Practice Research tory of allergy to a sulfonamide antibiotic Database identified 20,226 patients seen was 2.8 (95 % CI, 2.1–3.7). Of note, the from 1987 through March 1999 who adjusted odds ratio for the occurrence were prescribed a systemic sulfonamide of a allergy in a patient with a antibiotic, and then at least 60 days later history of sulfonamide antibiotic allergy received a nonantibiotic sulfonamide (eg, was significantly higher at 3.9 (95% CI, diuretic, furosemide, oral hypo- 3.5–4.3). glycemic).1 Researchers reviewed records Some limitations of the study includ- to determine whether patients described ed uncertainty of cause and effect of pre- as having an allergic reaction to a sulfon- scribed medications and subsequent reac- amide antibiotic were at increased risk of tions, possible inconsistency of physician having a subsequent allergic reaction to diagnosis and coding, and lack of precision a sulfonamide nonantibiotic. in the diagnosis of allergic reactions. There Patients were identified as being al- is also the possibility of “suspicion bias,” lergic using both narrow definitions where patients with a history of allergies (, bronchospasm, urticaria, may be more closely monitored for subse- laryngospasm, or angioedema) and quent reactions than nonallergic patients. broad ones. As only 18 patients out of the 20,226 patients were reported as On the other side, small studies having an allergic reaction using the nar- reveal little risk of cross-reaction row definition, analysis was based on Researchers involved in a retrospective the broad definition. Added to the broad study of 363 hospital charts examined category were asthma, eczema, and oth- 34 patients with a self-reported history of fast track er “adverse” drug effects that were not sulfa allergy who were subsequently giv- The odds of specified by the author. en acetazolamide (a carbonic anhydrase Using this broad definition, research- inhibitor), furosemide (a ), an allergy to ers identified allergies to sulfonamide an- or both.2 The nature of the self-reported a nonantibiotic tibiotics in 969 patients. Of this group, 96 sulfa allergic reaction was documented sulfonamide more patients (9.9%) had a subsequent reaction in 79% of the 34 patients. These re- than doubled to a sulfonamide nonantibiotic, which in- ported reactions included urticarial rash, cluded drugs from the loop and thiazide nonspecified rash, dyspnea, swelling, if the patient had diuretic classes (including , nausea or vomiting, throat swelling, red a history of allergy , furosemide, hydrochloro- eyes, and bullae. Two patients who were to a sulfonamide thiazide, indapamide, and torsemide). It given acetazolamide developed urticaria. was unclear if any patients taking a car- No allergic reactions occurred for those antibiotic bonic anhydrase inhibitor experienced patients given furosemide. an allergic reaction. For comparison pur- The researchers concluded that there poses, of the 19,257 patients who were was little clinical or pharmacological not identified as having an allergy to a evidence to suggest that a self-reported sulfonamide antibiotic, again using the sulfa allergy was likely to produce a life- broad definition, 315 (1.6%), had a sub- threatening cross-reaction with acetazol- sequent allergic reaction to a sulfonamide amide or furosemide. Small numbers and nonantibiotic, for an unadjusted odds ra- the lack of a standard definition for an tio of 6.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], allergic reaction limited the strength of 5.2–8.4). their conclusion. C O NTIN u e D

www.jfponline.com vol 56, No 6 / June 2007 489 Clinical Inquiries by ria and lack of explicit critical appraisal. reviews were limited by their search crite and non-sulfonamide antibiotics. activity sulfonamide between antibiotics cross-represencesupportsofdencethe “otherarticles” concludedandlittleevi reports, series, case case and ofnumber Two literature reviews examined the small Literature quent oral challenge with furosemide. subse a tolerated patient Everyagents. controlledoralchallenge testingtheseof investigated using also furosemide) was (including sulfonamides nonantibiotic azole.Potential cross-reactivity toseveral methoxazole,,sulfameth or sulfa challenge of oral an withpatient antibioticallergy confirmedwas each by ing. ternative to controlled oral challenge test al an testing as patch usefulness of the tiontosulfonamide antibiotics examined erupfixed drug historyoftientsa with

small 3 A smallsingle-blindApa 28study of Beforepatchtesting, sulfonamide a

numbers

reviews

limited

4,5 These ------R “Contraindications.” heading the under hydrochlorothiazide semide.” furo to allergic be also may fonamides cautions,” to sul that allergic “patients Pre heading the “General under states, The insert for manufacturer furosemide Recommendations study. previous the of to those of similar were tions study this limitedbyits small numbers and lack of was study This indapamide. and otics antibi sulfonamide between cross-reactivity of association an be may there that and furosemide or acetazolamide problem with cross-reactivity either with concluded that little evidence suggested a diuretic). authorsstudies, the the thiazidereviewing After (a indapamide for reportssemide,caseseries,case2 1 and to acetazolamide, 2 case reports for furo cross-reactivityreportsforcase 5 found diuretics,torevieweddrilled downthey tivity. that evaluated the articles”presence of “othercross-reac and reports, case ries, se caserevealed2004early21 to 1966 niitc ad diuretics. and antibiotics sulfonamide between cross-reactivity definitive supported evidence little that concluded authors —the and antibiotics sulfonamide between tivity cross-reac was focus main the which explicit critical appraisal.

5. 7. 4. 1. 2. 6. eferences s

j l uoeie Tablets,Furosemide Knowles Dyazide. ence. sulfonamides? to allergic are who patients in contraindicated be macother md cosratvt: at r fiction? or fact cross-reactivity: amide 2004; 138:114–118. Cross-reactivity,reality?or myth eso tetd ih ctzlmd o furosemide: or acetazolamide with treated intracranial with patients in allergy” “sulfa 349:1628–1635. and sulfonamide nonantibiotics. rs-eciiy ewe sloaie antibiotics sulfonamide between cross-reactivity Montvale, N A literatureA reviewMedlineoffrom In another literature review—in review—in literature another In ohnson KK, Green D Green KK, ohnson ee AG, AnersonAG,ee trom B trom 4 When the authors of this literature 61st ed. Montvale, N 6 L A similar warning occurs for for occurs warning similar A S 2005;39:290–301. , Physicians’ Desk Reference. Reference. Desk Physicians’ , S S J chinnar hapiro : Thomson;2007:1424. Drug Safe R , Kardon, L R US , , Apter A Apter , L S , hear NH. P.

R 2001;24:239–247. 7 J from

ife : Thomson; 2007:2155. hscas Ds Refer DeskPhysicians’ R n H, WallH, PresumedM. J J P, N Engl J Med 5 , et al. Absence of Absenceal. et , Am J OphthalmolJ Am h limita The

S L others imon hould celecoxib n Phar Ann L 1t ed. 61st . S 2003; ulfon ------