Supplemental Fig S2.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

hAT-38_HM_1p 1 Kolobok-1_Bf2p hAT-20_HM_1p 1 Kolobok-2_Bf2p hAT-47_SM_1p 0.96 Kolobok-1_CTe_2p 1 hAT-24_LCh_1p Kolobok-2_Xt2p hAT-29_LCh_1p 0.852 Kolobok-1_Aqu_2p Cyprinodontiformes Kolobok-4_DR_2p Perciformes Anoplopomatidae 1 Lampriformes Kolobok-1_AP_1p Pomacentridae 0.992 Kolobok-1_AP_2p 0.963 Holocentriformes 0.9 Kolobok-1_SKow_2p 0.985 Cypriniformes Kolobok-1_NV2p Kolobok-12_CGi_2p Labriformes 0.848 Kolobok-2_CGi_2p Perciformes Notothenioidei Gobiiformes 0.737 Siluriformes Perciformes Serranidae Cypriniformes Spariformes 1 Perciformes Percidae 0.992 Perciformes Sebastidae Esociformes 0.874 Holocentriformes Centrachiformes Anguilliformes Salmoniformes Gadiformes 1 Cyprinodontiformes Polypteryformes 0.937 0.999 Perciformes Serranidae Cypriniformes 0.999 0.997 0.9 Gadiformes Scombriformes Holocentriformes Perciformes Anoplopomatidae * Esociformes Beryciformes 0.805 Cyprinodontiformes Aulopiformes 0.9 Gadiformes 0.924 Perciformes Liparidae Clupeiformes Anoplopomtidae (1/1) Anoplopoma fimbria Gadiformes Cypriniformes Mugilidae 0.82 Cyprinodontiformes Percidae (1/6) hAT (863 AA) (863 hAT Clupeiformes 0.999 Etheostoma spectabi Anoplopomtidae (1/1) Perciformes Percidae Gadiformes Kolobok (137 AA) (137 Kolobok Anoplopoma fimbria Serranidae (3/8) Pseudochromidae 0.923 Epinephelus coioides Trachichthyiformes Gadiformes Percidae (4/6) Scombriformes E. lanceolatus Centrachiformes Sander vitreus Gadiformes E. moara Sander lucioperca Spariformes 0.995 Cypriniformes Sebastidae (9/9) Perca flavescens Sebastes aleutianus Perca fluviatilis Moronidae S. koreanus Cypriniformes 0.958 Scombriformes Nothothenioidei (2/2) Trachichthyiformes S. minor Perciformes Anoplopomatidae * Cypriniformes S. nigrocinctus Notothenia coriiceps Gadiformes S. norvegicus Chionodraco myersi 0.996 Cyprinodontiformes Gadiformes S. nudus Perciformes Percidae S. ruvrivinctus Liparidae (2/2) Cypriniformes S. schlegelli Liparis tanakae S. steindachneri 0.2 Pseudoliparis sp. Supplemental Figure S2. Phylogenetic trees of amino acid sequences of transposases from longer elements related to the Y- (hAT) and X-specific (Kolobok) MITEs. Trees were rooted using Repbase sequences (in black) as an outgroup as they appear more distantly related. Different colors correspond to the different main orders in which related elements have been identified. Numbers above the main branch represent the robustness SH test. Perciformes sequences are in orange, and pink for Anoplopoma fimbria. The species names where sequences were found (among Perciformes) are indicated next to the trees, classified by families. Number of species out of number of sequenced species. The asterisk for Anoplopomatidae sequences indicates the sequence found in the new assembly (Other Anoplopoma fimbria sequences are from the NCBI assembly)..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

OFFICE of RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS Please Adjust Your Settings in Acrobat to Continuous Facing to Properly View This File
YOU ARE VIEWING A .PDF FILE FROM THE OFFICE OF RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS Please adjust your settings in Acrobat to Continuous Facing to properly view this file. Thank You. CATFISH Jeff Gage Ichthyologist Larry Page with a Tiger Catfish. OME CATFISH BREATHE AIR AND SQUIGGLE ACROSS LAND.OTHERS STUN PREY WITH SSHOCKS REACHING 400 VOLTS.STILL OTHERS SUBSIST ON WOOD, LIKE TERMITES. Catfish are found on every continent except Antarctica. They range from fingernail-length miniatures to sedan- length monsters. They are among the most diverse and com- mon fishes, comprising one in four freshwater species. Despite nearly three centuries of exploration and research and the recognition of more than 2,700 species, an estimated 1,750 catfish species remain unknown to science. But not for long. Backed by a $4.7 million grant from the National Sci- ence Foundation, scientists at the University of Florida’s Florida Museum of Natural History have begun leading a five-year effort to discover and describe all catfish species. The only one of four similar projects in the NSF’s Planetary Bio- diversity Inventory program that focuses on vertebrates, the project will tap 230 scientists from around the globe, with many hauling nets and buckets into some of the world’s most remote waters. The other NSF projects focus on plants, insects and microscopic organisms called Eumycetozoa or, more commonly, slime molds. Randy Olson 18 Spring 2004 A native stalks a Suckermouth Armored Catfish in Guyana. HUNTERS BY AARON HOOVER SCIENTISTS WORLDWIDE AIM TO IDENTIFY ALL THE REMAINING SPECIES OF CATFISH, BEFORE IT’STOOLATE Practical considerations have says the goal is a comprehensive accounting before it’s too late.
[Show full text]
Article Evolutionary Dynamics of the OR Gene Repertoire in Teleost Fishes
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.09.434524; this version posted March 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Article Evolutionary dynamics of the OR gene repertoire in teleost fishes: evidence of an association with changes in olfactory epithelium shape Maxime Policarpo1, Katherine E Bemis2, James C Tyler3, Cushla J Metcalfe4, Patrick Laurenti5, Jean-Christophe Sandoz1, Sylvie Rétaux6 and Didier Casane*,1,7 1 Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 2 NOAA National Systematics Laboratory, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, U.S.A. 3Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 20560, U.S.A. 4 Independent Researcher, PO Box 21, Nambour QLD 4560, Australia. 5 Université de Paris, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Energies de Demain, Paris, France 6 Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, 91190, Gif-sur- Yvette, France. 7 Université de Paris, UFR Sciences du Vivant, F-75013 Paris, France. * Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]. !1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.09.434524; this version posted March 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Teleost fishes perceive their environment through a range of sensory modalities, among which olfaction often plays an important role.
[Show full text]
Zoology Marine Ornamental Fish Biodiversity of West Bengal ABSTRACT
Research Paper Volume : 4 | Issue : 8 | Aug 2015 • ISSN No 2277 - 8179 Zoology Marine Ornamental Fish Biodiversity of KEYWORDS : Marine fish, ornamental, West Bengal diversity, West Bengal. Principal Scientist and Scientist-in-Charge, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Dr. B. K. Mahapatra Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700091, India Director and Vice-Chancellor, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Versova, Dr. W. S. Lakra Mumbai- 400 061, India ABSTRACT The State of West Bengal, India endowed with 158 km coast line for marine water resources with inshore, up-shore areas and continental shelf of Bay of Bengal form an important fishery resource and also possesses a rich wealth of indigenous marine ornamental fishes.The present study recorded a total of 113 marine ornamental fish species, belonging to 75 genera under 45 families and 10 orders.Order Perciformes is represented by a maximum of 26 families having 79 species under 49 genera followed by Tetraodontiformes (5 family; 9 genus and 10 species), Scorpaeniformes (2 family; 3 genus and 6 species), Anguilliformes (2 family; 3 genus and 4 species), Syngnathiformes (2 family; 3 genus and 3 species), Pleuronectiformes (2 family; 2 genus and 4 species), Siluriformes (2 family; 2 genus and 3 species), Beloniformes (2 family; 2 genus and 2 species), Lophiformes (1 family; 1 genus and 1 species), Beryciformes(1 family; 1 genus and 1 species). Introduction Table 1: List of Marine ornamental fishes of West Bengal Ornamental fishery, which started centuries back as a hobby, ORDER 1: PERCIFORMES has now started taking the shape of a multi-billion dollar in- dustry.
[Show full text]
Order BERYCIFORMES ANOPLOGASTRIDAE Fangtooths (Ogrefish) by J.A
click for previous page 1178 Bony Fishes Order BERYCIFORMES ANOPLOGASTRIDAE Fangtooths (ogrefish) by J.A. Moore, Florida Atlantic University, USA iagnostic characters: Small (to about 160 mm standard length) beryciform fishes.Body short, deep, and Dcompressed, tapering to narrow peduncle. Head large (1/3 standard length). Eye smaller than snout length in adults, but larger than snout length in juveniles. Mouth very large and oblique, jaws extend be- hind eye in adults; 1 supramaxilla. Bands of villiform teeth in juveniles are replaced with large fangs on dentary and premaxilla in adults; vomer and palatines toothless. Deep sensory canals separated by ser- rated ridges; very large parietal and preopercular spines in juveniles of one species, all disappearing with age. Gill rakers as clusters of teeth on gill arch in adults (lath-like in juveniles). No true fin spines; single, long-based dorsal fin with 16 to 20 rays; anal fin very short-based with 7 to 9 soft rays; caudal fin emarginate; pectoral fins with 13 to 16 soft rays; pelvic fins with 7 soft rays. Scales small, non-overlapping, spinose, goblet-shaped in adults; lateral line an open groove partially bridged by scales; no enlarged ventral keel scutes. Colour: entirely dark brown or black in adults. Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Meso- to bathypelagic, at depths of 75 to 5 000 m. Carnivores, with juveniles feeding on mainly crustaceans and adults mainly on fishes. May sometimes swim in small groups. Uncommon deep-sea fishes of no commercial importance. Remarks: The family was revised recently by Kotlyar (1986) and contains 1 genus with 2 species throughout the tropical and temperate latitudes.
[Show full text]
BONY FISHES 602 Bony Fishes
click for previous page BONY FISHES 602 Bony Fishes GENERAL REMARKS by K.E. Carpenter, Old Dominion University, Virginia, USA ony fishes constitute the bulk, by far, of both the diversity and total landings of marine organisms encoun- Btered in fisheries of the Western Central Atlantic.They are found in all macrofaunal marine and estuarine habitats and exhibit a lavish array of adaptations to these environments. This extreme diversity of form and taxa presents an exceptional challenge for identification. There are 30 orders and 269 families of bony fishes presented in this guide, representing all families known from the area. Each order and family presents a unique suite of taxonomic problems and relevant characters. The purpose of this preliminary section on technical terms and guide to orders and families is to serve as an introduction and initial identification guide to this taxonomic diversity. It should also serve as a general reference for those features most commonly used in identification of bony fishes throughout the remaining volumes. However, I cannot begin to introduce the many facets of fish biology relevant to understanding the diversity of fishes in a few pages. For this, the reader is directed to one of the several general texts on fish biology such as the ones by Bond (1996), Moyle and Cech (1996), and Helfman et al.(1997) listed below. A general introduction to the fisheries of bony fishes in this region is given in the introduction to these volumes. Taxonomic details relevant to a specific family are explained under each of the appropriate family sections. The classification of bony fishes continues to transform as our knowledge of their evolutionary relationships improves.
[Show full text]
§4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
§4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
[Show full text]
Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi
Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 (http://www.accessscience.com/) Article by: Boschung, Herbert Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Gardiner, Brian Linnean Society of London, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London, United Kingdom. Publication year: 2014 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400) Content Morphology Euteleostei Bibliography Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi The most recent group of actinopterygians (rayfin fishes), first appearing in the Upper Triassic (Fig. 1). About 26,840 species are contained within the Teleostei, accounting for more than half of all living vertebrates and over 96% of all living fishes. Teleosts comprise 517 families, of which 69 are extinct, leaving 448 extant families; of these, about 43% have no fossil record. See also: Actinopterygii (/content/actinopterygii/009100); Osteichthyes (/content/osteichthyes/478500) Fig. 1 Cladogram showing the relationships of the extant teleosts with the other extant actinopterygians. (J. S. Nelson, Fishes of the World, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 2006) 1 of 9 10/7/2015 1:07 PM Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 Morphology Much of the evidence for teleost monophyly (evolving from a common ancestral form) and relationships comes from the caudal skeleton and concomitant acquisition of a homocercal tail (upper and lower lobes of the caudal fin are symmetrical). This type of tail primitively results from an ontogenetic fusion of centra (bodies of vertebrae) and the possession of paired bracing bones located bilaterally along the dorsal region of the caudal skeleton, derived ontogenetically from the neural arches (uroneurals) of the ural (tail) centra.
[Show full text]
CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E
ReyeS-BONIllA eT Al: CheCklIST AND BIOgeOgRAphy Of fISheS fROm gUADAlUpe ISlAND CalCOfI Rep., Vol. 51, 2010 CHECKLIST AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FISHES FROM GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor REyES-BONILLA, Arturo AyALA-BOCOS, LUIS E. Calderon-AGUILERA SAúL GONzáLEz-Romero, ISRAEL SáNCHEz-ALCántara Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada AND MARIANA Walther MENDOzA Carretera Tijuana - Ensenada # 3918, zona Playitas, C.P. 22860 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur Ensenada, B.C., México Departamento de Biología Marina Tel: +52 646 1750500, ext. 25257; Fax: +52 646 Apartado postal 19-B, CP 23080 [email protected] La Paz, B.C.S., México. Tel: (612) 123-8800, ext. 4160; Fax: (612) 123-8819 NADIA C. Olivares-BAñUELOS [email protected] Reserva de la Biosfera Isla Guadalupe Comisión Nacional de áreas Naturales Protegidas yULIANA R. BEDOLLA-GUzMáN AND Avenida del Puerto 375, local 30 Arturo RAMíREz-VALDEz Fraccionamiento Playas de Ensenada, C.P. 22880 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ensenada, B.C., México Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada km. 107, Apartado postal 453, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, B.C., México ABSTRACT recognized the biological and ecological significance of Guadalupe Island, off Baja California, México, is Guadalupe Island, and declared it a Biosphere Reserve an important fishing area which also harbors high (SEMARNAT 2005). marine biodiversity. Based on field data, literature Guadalupe Island is isolated, far away from the main- reviews, and scientific collection records, we pres- land and has limited logistic facilities to conduct scien- ent a comprehensive checklist of the local fish fauna, tific studies.
[Show full text]
Edna Assay Development
Environmental DNA assays available for species detection via qPCR analysis at the U.S.D.A Forest Service National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (NGC). Asterisks indicate the assay was designed at the NGC. This list was last updated in June 2021 and is subject to change. Please contact [email protected] with questions. Family Species Common name Ready for use? Mustelidae Martes americana, Martes caurina American and Pacific marten* Y Castoridae Castor canadensis American beaver Y Ranidae Lithobates catesbeianus American bullfrog Y Cinclidae Cinclus mexicanus American dipper* N Anguillidae Anguilla rostrata American eel Y Soricidae Sorex palustris American water shrew* N Salmonidae Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp Any cutthroat trout* N Petromyzontidae Lampetra spp. Any Lampetra* Y Salmonidae Salmonidae Any salmonid* Y Cottidae Cottidae Any sculpin* Y Salmonidae Thymallus arcticus Arctic grayling* Y Cyrenidae Corbicula fluminea Asian clam* N Salmonidae Salmo salar Atlantic Salmon Y Lymnaeidae Radix auricularia Big-eared radix* N Cyprinidae Mylopharyngodon piceus Black carp N Ictaluridae Ameiurus melas Black Bullhead* N Catostomidae Cycleptus elongatus Blue Sucker* N Cichlidae Oreochromis aureus Blue tilapia* N Catostomidae Catostomus discobolus Bluehead sucker* N Catostomidae Catostomus virescens Bluehead sucker* Y Felidae Lynx rufus Bobcat* Y Hylidae Pseudocris maculata Boreal chorus frog N Hydrocharitaceae Egeria densa Brazilian elodea N Salmonidae Salvelinus fontinalis Brook trout* Y Colubridae Boiga irregularis Brown tree snake*
[Show full text]
The Evolution of the Placenta Drives a Shift in Sexual Selection in Livebearing Fish
LETTER doi:10.1038/nature13451 The evolution of the placenta drives a shift in sexual selection in livebearing fish B. J. A. Pollux1,2, R. W. Meredith1,3, M. S. Springer1, T. Garland1 & D. N. Reznick1 The evolution of the placenta from a non-placental ancestor causes a species produce large, ‘costly’ (that is, fully provisioned) eggs5,6, gaining shift of maternal investment from pre- to post-fertilization, creating most reproductive benefits by carefully selecting suitable mates based a venue for parent–offspring conflicts during pregnancy1–4. Theory on phenotype or behaviour2. These females, however, run the risk of mat- predicts that the rise of these conflicts should drive a shift from a ing with genetically inferior (for example, closely related or dishonestly reliance on pre-copulatory female mate choice to polyandry in conjunc- signalling) males, because genetically incompatible males are generally tion with post-zygotic mechanisms of sexual selection2. This hypoth- not discernable at the phenotypic level10. Placental females may reduce esis has not yet been empirically tested. Here we apply comparative these risks by producing tiny, inexpensive eggs and creating large mixed- methods to test a key prediction of this hypothesis, which is that the paternity litters by mating with multiple males. They may then rely on evolution of placentation is associated with reduced pre-copulatory the expression of the paternal genomes to induce differential patterns of female mate choice. We exploit a unique quality of the livebearing fish post-zygotic maternal investment among the embryos and, in extreme family Poeciliidae: placentas have repeatedly evolved or been lost, cases, divert resources from genetically defective (incompatible) to viable creating diversity among closely related lineages in the presence or embryos1–4,6,11.
[Show full text]
Zootaxa, Pisces, Actinopterygii, Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae
Zootaxa 928: 1–20 (2005) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 928 Copyright © 2005 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Kryptolebias sepia n. sp. (Actinopterygii: Cyprinodontiformes: Riv- ulidae), a new killifish from the Tapanahony River drainage in southeast Surinam FRANS B. M. VERMEULEN1 & TOMAS HRBEK2* 1 Tanki Leendert 194 c, Noord, Aruba; [email protected] 2 Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras, San Juan, PR 00931, Puerto Rico; [email protected] * Correspondence to: TOMAS HRBEK Abstract Kryptolebias sepia n. sp. is described from small forest tributaries of the Tapanahony and Palumeu Rivers which form part of the Upper Marowijne River system in southeast of Surinam. This species is distinguished from all other Kryptolebias spp. and Rivulus spp. by strong melanism on the body, its ability to change color pattern rapidly, the lack of strong sexual dimorphism, and the presence of pronounced adult/juvenile dichromatism. Key words: Rivulus, Kryptolebias, Guyana Shield, mtDNA, speciation, molecular phylogeny, biodiversity Introduction The fauna and flora of the Guyana shield is particularly rich. While extensive floristic sur- veys have been undertaken, relatively little work has been conducted on the fish fauna of this region. Most surveys have been done in Venezuela, and Brazilian surveys have con- centrated primarily on the middle Rio Negro drainage. The first and last major survey of Guyana was conducted by Eigenmann in 1909 (Eigenmann 1912), and more recently his route has been retraced by researchers focusing on loricariid catfishes (Hardman et al. 2002). A survey of freshwater fishes of French Guiana has also been published (Keith et al.
[Show full text]
Ecology and Conservation of Mudminnow Species Worldwide
FEATURE Ecology and Conservation of Mudminnow Species Worldwide Lauren M. Kuehne Ecología y conservación a nivel mundial School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 de los lucios RESUMEN: en este trabajo, se revisa y resume la ecología Julian D. Olden y estado de conservación del grupo de peces comúnmente School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Box conocido como “lucios” (anteriormente conocidos como 355020, Seattle, WA 98195, and Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith Uni- la familia Umbridae, pero recientemente reclasificados en versity, QLD, 4111, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] la Esocidae) los cuales se constituyen de sólo cinco espe- cies distribuidas en tres continentes. Estos peces de cuerpo ABSTRACT: We review and summarize the ecology and con- pequeño —que viven en hábitats de agua dulce y presentan servation status of the group of fishes commonly known as movilidad limitada— suelen presentar poblaciones aisla- “mudminnows” (formerly known as the family Umbridae but das a lo largo de distintos paisajes y son sujetos a las típi- recently reclassified as Esocidae), consisting of only five species cas amenazas que enfrentan las especies endémicas que distributed on three continents. These small-bodied fish—resid- se encuentran en contacto directo con los impactos antro- ing in freshwater habitats and exhibiting limited mobility—often pogénicos como la contaminación, alteración de hábitat occur in isolated populations across landscapes and are subject e introducción de especies no nativas. Aquí se resume el to conservation threats common to highly endemic species in conocimiento actual acerca de la distribución, relaciones close contact with anthropogenic impacts, such as pollution, filogenéticas, ecología y estado de conservación de cada habitat alteration, and nonnative species introductions.
[Show full text]