DOCSLIB.ORG

International Association RUSSIAN CULTURE St. Petersburg Branch Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Association RUSSIAN CULTURE St. Petersburg Branch Of International Association RUSSIAN CULTURE St. Petersburg Branch of the Russian Institute for Cultural Research UNESCO Chair for Comparative Studies of Spiritual Traditions, Specifics of their Cultures and Interreligious Dialogue UNESCO Moscow Office Proceedings of seminar, conducted in the framework of the International Year to Commemorate Struggle against Slavery and its Abolition, proclaimed by the UN General Assembly, and the UNESCO «Slave Route» project in St. Petersburg, Russia on December 17th, 2004 St. Petersburg 2005 Supported by the UNESCO Moscow Office Editorial board: D. L. Spivak (editorinchief), A. V. Venkova (academic secretary), Е. V. Elagina, D. A. Ivashintsov, E. V. Lunyaev, А. М. Melikhov, A. Yu. Timashkov Serfdom in Russia and its Abolition: History and Presentday Issues. — St. Petersburg: EIDOS, 2005. — 164 p. ISBN 5886070281 Proceedings of seminar ‘Serfdom in Russia and its Abolition: History and Presentday Issues’, conducted in the framework of the International Year to Commemorate Struggle against Slavery and its Abolition, proclaimed by the UN General Assembly, and the UNESCO ‘Slave Route’ project, with participation of intellectual, cultural and educational leaders of St. Petersburg, are presented in the present bilingual, EnglishRussian edition. The brochure is foreseen for wide audience of readers. The ideas and opinions expressed in this issue belong to their respective authors and may not necessarily be representations of the views of the UNESCO organization. UNESCO Moscow Office International Association for Armenia, Azerbaijan, RUSSIAN CULTURE Belarus, Georgia, [email protected] the Republic of Moldova www.russkyformat.ru and the Russian Federation 15/28, Bolshoi Levshinsky per., bld. 2 St. Petersburg Branch of the 119034 Moscow Russia Tel.: (095) 2028097; 2028759; 202 8166 Russian Institute for Fax: (095) 2020568 Cultural Research [email protected]; www.unesco.ru [email protected] ISBN 5886070281 ©EIDOS, 2005 ©UNESCO Moscow Office, 2005 9 785886 070286 Contents Spivak D. L. Introduction* ........................................................................................ 5 Mironov B. N. Serfdom: Rational Institution, or Unquestionable Harm?..................... 8 Poltorak S. N. Humane Aspects of Russian Serfdom ................................................ 11 Gordin Ya. A. Serfdom and Class Politics of Russian Autocracy ............................... 12 Sverdlov M. B. Origins of Serfdom and its Abolition* .............................................. 14 Archimandrite Augustine. The Second Serfdom of Communists .............................. 17 Kavtorin V. V. Communal Ownership of Land in the Framework of Serfdom ............ 20 Chebanov S. V. A Cycle of Russian History: from Emancipation of Peasants to Yeltsin’s Leave* .............................................................................................. 23 Semenkov V. E. Serfdom: Civil Rights or their Absence? .......................................... 25 Griakalov A. A. Mythologeme of Serfdom in Contemporary Consciousness ............. 26 Okladnikova Е. А. On Axiology of Status of those employed in Services in Contemporary Russia* ........................................................................................ 28 Protasenko I. N. «Slave Routes» in Contemporary Mentality ................................... 32 Travin D. Ya. Reform of Serfdom and the Global Economic Crisis ............................ 35 Shchelkin A. G. Phenomenon of Russian Paternalism............................................... 37 Chernoukha V. G. Lack of Alternative as Basic Property of Russian Serfdom............ 38 Makhlina S. T. Serfdom and Contemporary Artistic Culture in Russia* ................... 41 Melikhov А. М. Uncle Anton’s Cabin* ..................................................................... 46 Sekatsky A. K. Serfdom in History of the «Emergency State» in Russia .................... 49 Annenkova E. I. Serfdom and Russian Literature ..................................................... 53 Concluding Remarks Gordin Ya. A. Products of «Unproductive Bondage» ................................................ 55 Lurie F. M. State Policy after Abolition of Serfdom .................................................. 56 Letyagin L. N. Apparition: Fragments of a Political and Artistic Chronicle* ............. 58 Sobol V. A. Slavery and Gentry: Friends or Antipodes? ............................................ 62 Cherva V. E. Notion of Freedom in Life of Russian Peasants ..................................... 64 Kavtorin V. V. Russian Reforms Yesterday and Today.............................................. 67 Chebanov S. V. Serfdom: History or Phantome? ...................................................... 68 Sverdlov М. B. History of Serfdom between Historical Materialism and Ideology..... 69 * Titles marked by an asterisk belong to the authors; titles not marked by this sign, have been introduced by the editorial board. 4 Contents Spivak D. L. Conclusion* ........................................................................................ 70 Appendix 1. Radioserial ‘Serfdom in Russia and its Abolition: History and Presentday Issues’ .......................................................................... 71 Appendix 2. Basic Information Concerning UNESCO Project «Slave Routes» (1994–2004) ...................................................................................................... 74 D. L. Spivak Director, St. Petersburg branch, Russian Institute of Cultural Research: Introduction Abolition of serfdom, declared by manifesto of the Russian emperor on February 19th, 1861 was a wellprepared and desired step — and at the same time, a massive, tectonic shift which overturned life on vast territories of Northern Eurasia. Landowners, domi nating in the Russian society at that time, undertook considerable concessions, in order not to face a catastrophy shaped after the Civil war in the USA, which took place approx imately at the same time. The program which was so happily initiated by tsar Alexander II and his retinue, open ing way for free market and capitalist enterprises, led at the same to chain of events which tended to be regarded by the Russian society as retarded, if not painful. It would be enough to remind that the socalled redemption money, which was to be paid by peasants to land owners, remained a considerable burden for them practically until the revolts of 1905. As to the psychological trauma, it tended only to gain momentum until that time, and even after its onset. Those people who initiated the Great Russian revolution of 1917 and who gave every possible effort to its diffusion on planetary scale, were mostly children and/or grandchildren of those farmers who gained personal freedom a little more than half a century before that time. We would not commit a mistake emphasizing that colossal collectivization which was undertaken in the Soviet Union in the end of the 1920ies — the beginning if 1930ies is seen by quite a few specialists as ‘the second edition of the traditional Russian serfdom’ — somewhat renewed, but basically intact, and this position is regarded by the presentday Russian society as heuristically constructive. It would be a mistake to regard Russian serfdom in terms of its classical counterpart, which contributed greatly to construction of great empires of the ancient GrecoRoman 6 D. L. Spivak V. Makovsky. January 9th, 1905 at the Vassilyevski island. 1905 world, as well as of slavery which ravaged vast territories of black Africa at the beginning of the modern era. At the same time, some parallels with these wellknown phenomena were quite obvious for Russian contemporaries of ‘the Great Reforms’ of tsar Alexander II. Looking from the position of our time, we feel authorized to regard abolition of serf dom in Russia as part of an inspiring process of liberation, which was initiated by slave revolts which took place on the American continent about two hundred years ago, to gave way to creation of the state of Haiti. As to the latest events, which took place in the framework of decolonization and creation of independent states in Africa, Asia and Latin America, we feel ourselves to be their true witnesses. The general course of events being thus quite understandable for us, there exists a number of difficult problems, which are not yet fully resolved, and at the same time tend form a focal point of both the societal debate, and the scientific analysis. – To which extent was abolition of serfdom in Russia a pragmatic undertaking, and to which extent — a ‘reform of idealists’? – To assume the first one of the cited positions, how well chosen were the time of its initiating, as well as its means, and, correspondingly, were it the Russian ‘planta tors’ or ‘manchesters’ who turned out to be historically true? Introduction 7 B. Koustodiev. Bolshevik. 1920 – To assume the second position, what role was played in the abolition process by the Russian classical literature and journalism? – What place in the debates and processes of the contemporary, rapidly globalizing world could be constructively occupied by the Russian experience of abolition — and in which way could we in Russia gain novel ideas and viewpoints in struggle to reform our postcommunist society, still torn by conflicts, from the general frame work, created by the International year to commemorate struggle against slavery and its abolition, proclaimed by the UN General Assembly, together with the ma terials of the ‘Slave Route’ project, initiated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Effect of Serfdom on Labor Markets†
    The effect of serfdom on labor markets† Peter Sandholt Jensen Cristina Victoria Radu Battista Severgnini Paul Richard Sharp Department of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark Abstract This research provides evidence on how restrictions on labor mobility, such as serfdom and other types of labor coercion, impact labor market outcomes. To do so, we estimate the impact of a large shock to labor mobility in the form of the reintroduction of serfdom in Denmark in 1733, which was targeted at limiting the mobility of farmhands. While many economists, historians and others have argued that serfdom had an impact on the mobility and wages, revisionist historians have countered that workers found ways to circumvent the restrictions imposed by serfdom. Using a unique data source based on 18th century estates, we test whether serfdom affected the wages of farmhands more strongly than other groups in the labor market using a differences-in-differences approach, and find evidence consistent with a strong negative effect on serfdom following its introduction. We also investigate whether one mechanism was that boys with rural backgrounds were prevented from taking up apprenticeships in towns, and find suggestive evidence that this was indeed the case. Thus, our results suggest that serfdom was effectively reducing mobility. Keywords: Serfdom, labor mobility, coercion JEL Classification: J3, N33, P4. † We thank Philipp Ager, Jeremy Atack, Casper Worm Hansen, Alex Klein, Christian Skovsgaard, Nico Voigtländer and seminar participants at University of Copenhagen, University of Southern Denmark and the 2017 Economic History Association conference in San Jose for useful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Northerners' Perspectives on American Emancipation and the End of Russian Serfdom
    University of Central Florida STARS Honors Undergraduate Theses UCF Theses and Dissertations 2021 Northerners' Perspectives on American Emancipation and the End of Russian Serfdom Mariana S. Kellis University of Central Florida Part of the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the UCF Theses and Dissertations at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Kellis, Mariana S., "Northerners' Perspectives on American Emancipation and the End of Russian Serfdom" (2021). Honors Undergraduate Theses. 947. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses/947 NORTHERNERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON AMERICAN EMANCIPATION AND THE END OF RUSSIAN SERFDOM By: MARIANA KELLIS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in History in the College of Arts and Humanities and in the Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term, 2021 Thesis Chair: Barbara Gannon, Ph.D. Abstract This thesis explores the various perspectives that Northern Americans had on Russian serfdom and its emancipation. This era was significant to both Russia and the United States because each country experienced tremendous reforms including the abolitions of their unfree labor institutions. Generally, Northern Americans viewed serfdom as a milder form of forced labor and suspected that it would be eradicated soon. Abolitionists used rumors of Russian emancipation to advocate for the end of American slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • Serfdom and Slavery 1St Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    SERFDOM AND SLAVERY 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK M L Bush | 9781317887485 | | | | | Serfdom and Slavery 1st edition PDF Book Thus, the manorial system exhibited a degree of reciprocity. In Early Modern France, French nobles nevertheless maintained a great number of seigneurial privileges over the free peasants that worked lands under their control. Villeins generally rented small homes, with a patch of land. German History. Hull Domesday Project. Encyclopedia of Human Rights: Vol. Cosimo, Inc. State serfs were emancipated in Why was the abbot so determined to keep William in prison? Book of Winchester. Clergy Knowledge worker Professor. With the growing profitability of industry , farmers wanted to move to towns to receive higher wages than those they could earn working in the fields, [ citation needed ] while landowners also invested in the more profitable industry. Admittedly, after that strong stance the explanation in the textbooks tends to get a bit hazy, and for good reason. Furthermore, the increasing use of money made tenant farming by serfs less profitable; for much less than it cost to support a serf, a lord could now hire workers who were more skilled and pay them in cash. The land reforms in northwestern Germany were driven by progressive governments and local elites [ citation needed ]. Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from December Articles with unsourced statements from June Wikipedia articles needing clarification from December All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from December Vague or ambiguous geographic scope from April Articles with unsourced statements from May Articles with unsourced statements from May In such a case he could strike a bargain with a lord of a manor.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery and Bondage
    This open access library edition is supported by Knowledge Unlatched. Not for resale. Bondage This open access library edition is supported by Knowledge Unlatched. Not for resale. International Studies in Social History General Editor: Marcel van der Linden, International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam Volume 1 Volume 16 Trade Unions, Immigration and Immigrants Forging Political Identity in Europe 1960–1993 Keith Mann Edited by Rinus Penninx and Judith Roosblad Volume 17 Volume 2 Gendered Money Class and Other Identities Pernilla Jonsson and Silke Neunsinger Edited by Lex Heerma van Voss and Marcel van der Linden Volume 18 Postcolonial Migrants and Identity Politics Volume 3 Edited by Ulbe Bosma, Jan Lucassen, Rebellious Families and Gert Oostindie Edited by Jan Kok Volume 19 Volume 4 Charismatic Leadership and Experiencing Wages Social Movements Edited by Peter Scholliers and Leonard Schwarz Edited by Jan Willem Stutje Volume 5 Volume 20 The Imaginary Revolution Maternalism Reconsidered Michael Seidman Edited by Marian van der Klein, Rebecca Jo Volume 6 Plant, Nichole Sanders and Lori R. Weintrob Revolution and Counterrevolution Kevin Murphy Volume 21 Routes into the Abyss Volume 7 Edited by Helmut Konrad and Wolfgang Miners and the State in the Ottoman Empire Maderthaner Donald Quataert Volume 22 Volume 8 Alienating Labour Anarchism, Revolution and Reaction Eszter Bartha Angel Smith Volume 23 Volume 9 Migration, Settlement and Belonging Sugarlandia Revisited in Europe, 1500–1930s Edited by Ulbe Bosma, Juan Edited by Steven King and Anne Winter Giusti-Cordero and G. Roger Knight Volume 24 Volume 10 Bondage Alternative Exchanges Alessandro Stanziani Edited by Laurence Fontaine Volume 11 Volume 25 A Social History of Spanish Labour Bread from the Lion’s Mouth: Artisans Struggling for a Livelihood in Ottoman Cities Edited by José Piqueras and Vicent Sanz-Rozalén Edited by Suraiya Faroqhi Volume 12 Learning on the Shop Floor Volume 26 Edited by Bert De Munck, The History of Labour Intermediation: Steven L.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Finance and Imposition of Serfdom After the Black Death
    Government Finance and Imposition of Serfdom after the Black Death Margaret E. Peters∗ University of California, Los Angeles Abstract After the Black Death, serfdom disappeared in Western Europe while making a resurgence in Eastern Europe. What explains this difference? I argue that serfdom was against the interests of the sovereign and was only imposed when the nobility, most of whom needed serfdom to maintain their economic and social standing, had leverage to impose their will. One way the nobility gained this power was through financing the military. Using data from the fourteenth to through the eighteenth centuries, I show that serfdom was imposed in areas where sovereigns had few other resources to pay for war or defense. This paper addresses the causes of a historical institution that scholars from Moore (1966) to Acemoglu and Robinson (2006) have argued played an important role in the development, or lack thereof, of democracy and long-term economic growth. ∗Department of Political Science, UCLA, 4289 Bunche Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095, [email protected]. I would like to thank Jessica Clayton, Stephen Moncrief, and Mark Toukan for their research assistance. I would also like to thank Maarten Bosker, Davide Cantoni, David Stasavage, and Nico Voigtländer for sharing their data. and Allison Carnegie, Jeff Colgan, Mark Dincecco, Steve Haber, Seva Guinitsky, Andrew Kerner, Frances Rosenbluth, David Steinberg, Felicity Vabulas, and the participants of the Stanford Comparative Politics Workshop, the 2013 IPES Conference, the 2014 International Studies Association Annual Conference, and the Yale International Relations Workshop for their comments. All errors remain my own. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3320807 Introduction In Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, the laws governing the lives of peasants in Europe diverged.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southern Denmark the Introduction of Serfdom and Labor
    University of Southern Denmark The introduction of serfdom and labor markets Jensen, Peter Sandholt; Radu, Cristina Victoria; Severgnini, Battista; Sharp, Paul Richard Publication date: 2018 Citation for pulished version (APA): Jensen, P. S., Radu, C. V., Severgnini, B., & Sharp, P. R. (2018). The introduction of serfdom and labor markets. European Historical Economics Society Working Paper series No. 140 Go to publication entry in University of Southern Denmark's Research Portal Terms of use This work is brought to you by the University of Southern Denmark. Unless otherwise specified it has been shared according to the terms for self-archiving. If no other license is stated, these terms apply: • You may download this work for personal use only. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying this open access version If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details and we will investigate your claim. Please direct all enquiries to [email protected] Download date: 24. Sep. 2021 European Historical Economics Society EHES Working Paper | No. 140 | November 2018 The introduction of serfdom and labour markets Peter Sandholt Jensen, University of Southern Denmark Cristina Victoria Radu, University of Southern Denmark Battista Severgnini, Copenhagen Business School Paul Sharp, University of Southern Denmark, CAGE, CEPR EHES Working Paper | No. 140 | November 2018 The introduction of serfdom and labour markets Peter Sandholt Jensen, University of Southern Denmark Cristina Victoria Radu, University of Southern Denmark Battista Severgnini, Copenhagen Business School Paul Sharp, University of Southern Denmark, CAGE, CEPR Abstract We provide evidence of how restrictions on labor mobility, such as serfdom and other types of labor coercion, impact labor market outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gothic Presence of Poland in Nineteenth-Century American
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository English Language and Literature ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2-1-2016 The Gothic rP esence of Poland in Nineteenth- Century American Literature Jill Noel Walker Gonzalez Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/engl_etds Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Walker Gonzalez, Jill Noel. "The Gothic rP esence of Poland in Nineteenth-Century American Literature." (2016). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/engl_etds/32 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Language and Literature ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i Jill Noel Walker Gonzalez Candidate English Language and Literature Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Jesse Alemán, Chairperson Peter L. White Kathleen Washburn Thomas Napierkowski ii THE GOTHIC PRESENCE OF POLAND IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY AMERICAN LITERATURE By JILL NOEL WALKER GONZALEZ B.A., English, Columbia Union College, 2003 M.A., English, La Sierra University, 2006 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy English The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December, 2015 iii Dedication For my great God who has enabled me to do what I thought I couldn’t do. Soli Deo Gloria. For Piotr and Joanna Jamroziak who taught me to love Poland. Kocham wam i kocham Polskę.
    [Show full text]
  • The Introduction of Serfdom and Labor Markets†
    The introduction of serfdom and labor markets† Peter Sandholt Jensen, University of Southern Denmark Cristina Victoria Radu, University of Southern Denmark Battista Severgnini, Copenhagen Business School Paul Sharp, University of Southern Denmark, CAGE, CEPR Abstract: This research provides evidence on how restrictions on labor mobility, such as serfdom and other types of labor coercion, impact labor market outcomes. To do so, we estimate the impact of a large shock to labor mobility in the form of the reintroduction of serfdom in Denmark in 1733, which was targeted at limiting the mobility of farmhands. While many economists, historians and others have argued that serfdom had an impact on the mobility and wages, revisionist historians have countered that workers found ways to circumvent the restrictions imposed by serfdom. Using a unique data source based on 18th century estates, we test whether serfdom affected the wages of farmhands more strongly than other groups in the labor market using a differences-in-differences approach, and find evidence consistent with a strong negative effect on serfdom following its introduction. We also investigate whether one mechanism was that boys with rural backgrounds were prevented from taking up apprenticeships in towns, and find suggestive evidence that this was indeed the case. Thus, our results suggest that serfdom was effectively reducing mobility. Keywords: Serfdom, labor mobility, coercion JEL Classification: J3, N33, P4. † We thank Philipp Ager, Jeremy Atack, Karol Borowiecki, Metin Cosgel, Casper Worm Hansen, Alex Klein, Lars Lund, Noel Maurer, Christian Skovsgaard, Nico Voigtländer and seminar participants at University of Ancona, University of Copenhagen, University of Lund, University of Southern Denmark, the 2017 Economic History Association conference in San Jose and the 2018 American Economic Association conference at Philadelphia for useful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation
    Caliban and the Witch Silvia Federici A utonornedia Acknowledgements To the many witches I have met in the Women’s Movement, and to the other witches whose stories have accompanied me for more than twenty-five years, nevertheless leaving an inexhaustible desire to tell, to let people know,to make sure that they will not be forgotten. To our brother Jonathan Cohen whose love, courage and uncompromising resistance to injustice have helped me not lose faith in the possibility of chang­ ing the world and in men’s ability to make the struggle for women’s liberation their own. To the people who have helped me to produce this volume. I thank George Caffentzis with whom I have discussed every aspect of this book; Mitchel Cohen for his excdlent comments, his editing o f parts o f the manuscript, and his enthusiastic support for tlis project; Ousscina Alidou and Maria Sari for introducing me to the work o f Maryse Conde; Ferruccio Gambino for mak­ ing me aware o f the existence o f slavery in 16'h- and 17th-century Italy; David Goldstein for the materials he has given me on the witches’‘‘pharmakopeia’'; Conrad Herold, for contributing to my research on witch hunting in Peru; Massimo de Angelis, for giving me his writings on prinutive accumulation and for the important debate on th s topic which he organized in TIte Commoner; Willy Murunga for the materials he has given me on the legal aspects o f witch­ craft in East Africa. I thank Michaela Brennan and VeenaVisW2 natha for read­ ing die manuscript and giving me advice and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweezy and Dobb, “The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism”
    The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism Author(s): Paul M. Sweezy and Maurice Dobb Source: Science & Society , Spring, 1950, Vol. 14, No. 2 (Spring, 1950), pp. 134-167 Published by: Guilford Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40400000 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Science & Society This content downloaded from 97.99.68.206 on Sun, 22 Aug 2021 04:05:31 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms COMMUNICATIONS THE TRANSITION FROM FEUDALISM TO CAPITALISM We live in the period of transition from capitalism to socialism; and this fact lends particular interest to studies of earlier transitions from one social system to another. This is one reason, among many others, why Maurice Dobb's Studies in the Development of Capitalism1 is such a timely and important book. Something like a third of the whole volume is devoted to the decline of feudalism and the rise of capitalism. In this article I shall confine my attention exclusively to this aspect of Dobb's work. (i) Dobb's Definition of Feudalism Dobb defines feudalism as being "virtually identical with what we usually mean by serfdom: an obligation laid on the producer by force and independently of his own volition to fulfill certain economic demands of an overlord, whether these demands take the form of services to be performed or of dues to be paid in money or in kind" (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Appendix for the Slow Road from Serfdom: Labor Coercion and Long-Run Development in the Former Russian Empire
    Supplementary Appendix for The Slow Road from Serfdom: Labor Coercion and Long-Run Development in the Former Russian Empire Johannes C. Buggle * Steven Nafziger† August 4, 2019 This appendix accompanies the paper “The Slow Road from Serfdom: Labor Coercion and Long-Run Development in the Former Russian Empire’’ by Johannes C. Buggle and Steven Nafziger. Contents A Data Description and Sources3 A.1 Country-Level Data....................................3 A.2 District-Level Data....................................3 A.3 Life in Transition Surveys (2006 - 2016)........................6 A.4 City-Level Data......................................8 A.5 Firm-Level Data 1989...................................9 A.6 Descriptive Statistics................................... 10 A.7 The Distribution of Serfdom.............................. 14 A.8 Spatial Distribution of Primary Sampling Units................... 16 B Determinants of Serfdom and Omnibus Test 17 B.1 Determinants of Serfdom: All Controls Reported.................. 17 B.2 Assessing Bias with the Omnibus Test......................... 18 C Additional Results: Households and Individuals 19 C.1 Additional Robustness Checks............................. 19 C.2 The Differential Effect of Geographic Fundamentals................ 30 C.3 Inequality and Public Goods Provision........................ 32 C.4 Cultural Attitudes and Preferences........................... 34 C.5 Protest and Collective Action.............................. 39 *Department of Economics, University of Lausanne. mail: [email protected] †Department of Economics, Williams College. mail: [email protected] D Additional Results: City Population 40 D.1 Cross-Sectional Estimation in the Period 1897 - 2002................ 40 D.2 Panel Estimation in the Period 1800 - 2002: Balanced Sample........... 47 D.3 Panel Estimation in the Period 1800 - 2002: Unbalanced Sample......... 53 D.4 Province-Level Results.................................. 58 E Additional Results: Military Factories 59 E.1 Firm Location and Firm Growth 1939 - 1989....................
    [Show full text]
  • Serfdom As a Category in Historical Analysis
    Serfdom as a Category in Historical Analysis Vishwa Mohan Jha ARSD College, University of Delhi Radha Krishna Choudhary Memorial Lecture Mithila ltihas Sansthan, Darbhanga Second Biennial National Conference, April 2-3, 2011 0 Mr. President, Colleagues, and Friends, It is indeed a privilege to be associated with the memory of a worker of such tireless application as Professor Radha Krishna Chaudhary. I am grateful to Mithila ltihas Sansthan for bestowing upon me this honour, and should like to use this opportunity to speak on one of the concepts in which Professor Chaudhary had a lifelong interest, i.e. the concept of serfdom as a category in historical analysis. The occasion furnishes a chance also to revisit, in line with the universalist vision of Professor Chaudhary, the works of some of the greatest names in the discipline of history, especially Marc Bloch. Of the trio 'slavery, serfdom, and wage labour', the problem of serfdom is unique in a very real sense. Identifying the slave or the wage labourer in history is hardly considered problematic by historians, generally speaking. By contrast, defining a serf has probably been the single most important issue in the scholarly studies on serfdom, as it has been in the past in the disputes about who the serf was. It is an issue oflong standing. As early as 1925, Bloch asked: 'Who was a serf?', and pointed out: ' Today's historians often ask this question, aqd rarely agree on the answer.' 1 The reason for this is that in the past serfdom meant very different things in different periods and places, and was liable to create false impressions about itself even at any given time and place (men and women 1 Marc Bloch, 'The Transformation of Serfdom: Concerning Two Thirteenth-Century Documents Regarding the Parisian Region' ( 1925), in Bloch, Slavery and Serfdom in the Middle Ages, translated by William R.
    [Show full text]