Page 1

Judy Wilyman | Vaccination Update

Newsletter 200 The Sydney Morning Herald Corrects Itself: 'Flu Vaccines "Do Little"'

6 June 2018

Please note: The 2018 Sydney Vaccination Conference: The Censorship of the Vaccination Debate in will be held on Saturday 30 June from 1-5 pm

If you are concerned about mandatory, coercivie and discriminatory vaccination policies that the Australian government is implementing in the NJNP/P legislation (with ~16 vaccines or 52 doses required by children) then please take the time to come to the "2018 Vaccination Conference: the Censorship of the Vaccination Debate in Australia". This conference is being held on Saturday June 30 in Sydney and it is time for the public to take a stand to protect our human right to bodily integrity and to challenge the Australian government and the Medical Board of Australia for the .evidence for these extreme vaccination policies

The False and Misleading Information Provided on Vaccines by the Mainstream Media

On the 25th May 2018 I wrote Newsletter 199 titled 'The Sydney Morning Herald Providing False and Misleading Information about Flu Vaccines'. This was sent to the SMH editor for a response and on the 4th June 2018 the SMH published this article titled ''Flu vaccines 'do little', wear face mask instead says health expert.'

In this article Dr. Chris Del Mar, Professor of Public Health at Bond University states "the influenza vaccine has been oversold in Australia" and this push by the Australian government 'with a "weak" (flu) vaccine is overshadowing effective prevention methods such as hand-washing 'a- nd mask wearing .

Further, Dr. Tony Baratone, president of the Australian Medical Association (AMA), states "that the influenza vaccine is not as effective as a number of other vaccines" yet this information is not being publlcly debated and this has resulted in the Australian government recommending the mandating o-. f the flu vaccine for all healthcare workers in aged care facilities

18/03/2021 Page 2

This has been adopted in some states even though the Australian government, the Medical Board of Australia (MBA) and the AMA have not provided any evidence to support this policy.

Whilst it is claimed in the mainstream media that there was a horror flu season last year, the AMA has not revealed that there was also a high uptake of the flu vaccine in 2017 (higher than previous years because of the advertising campaign) nor has it provided the number of people vaccinated with the flu vaccine last year that still got hospitalised with flu.

The media and the AMA are being permitted to make claims about vaccines to the public without providing the evidence to support these claims and without publicising an accurate number of the deaths and injuries that are occurring to vaccines - or revealing the ingredients that are injected into the tissues with each vaccine.

The breaches of human rights and discrimination in the government's No Jab No Pay / Play (NJNP/P) policies are described in my webinair that is published on the Australian Naturopathic Practitioner's Association website.

The webinair is titled "Informed Consent to Vaccination in Australia by Judy Wilyman PhD" and it describes why Australia's national immunisation program (NIP) that is promoted by the Medical Board of Australia is not a 'protective' public health policy.

The NJNP/P policies are damaging human health and the genetics of the Australian population because they are not evaluated on the health of the population. In 1995 it was decided by the GAVI alliance (private-public partnerships including the Federation of Pharmaceutical Companies) that global vaccination programs would be evaluated on the immunisation uptake in the population.

Hence doctors and consumers in Australia are paid to vaccinate to 'raise the immunisation rates' based on the assumption that this improves the health of the population - no proof is provided that this is the case because the statistics support the opposite conclusion.

Did you know that chronic illness and autism has escalated 5 -10 fold since the 1990's when the NIP expanded? But the Australian government is not required to acknowledge or publicise this fact because they do not assess the success of these programs on population or children's health.

The evidence for these facts are presented in my webinair describing the crime against humanity that is being committed by the Australian government with its current vaccination program and in my PhD thesis that is published by the .

Despite the fact that every other professional or parent who attempts to present the science questioning the effectiveness of vaccines is shut-down in the mainstream media as "anti- vaccination" the Sydney Morning Herald has decided to publish Dr. Chris Del Mar's comments without labelling them as 'anti-vaccination'. I wonder what has caused this change of strategy? (See the box below for the explanation).

The public needs to demand that the Medical Board of Australia and the Australian Government provide:

1. The definition of the term 'anti-vaccination' that they are using to direct health practitioners to promote government vaccination policies to maintain their medical 18/03/2021 Page 3

1. registration? How can doctors and health practitioners put their patient's interests first if they are not permitted to discuss the risks of vaccination without being deregistered from their profession? 2. Why does the Royal Australian College of Physicians (RACP), that has thousands of members in Australia, have an official position of supporting fully informed parental consent to vaccination without financial coercion, but it is not required to enforce this position (that is embedded in all international human rights covenants and good medical practice guidelines) with its members? This situation is allowing the MBA to de-register doctors / nurses who present the risks of vaccines to their patients, by describing these risks as 'anti-vaccination'. This is not in their patient's best interest and this is breaching the MBA's medical code of conduct. It is also a situation that does not protect public health in genetically diverse populations. There is extreme anxiety and concern in the Australian community regarding the suppression of the scientific debate on vaccination and the removal of the public's voice in government policy.

The Sydney Vaccination Conference will be held from 1-5 pm on Saturday 30 June 2018 with many speakers that are listed on this link to the tickets for this event. Places are limited so please get in early for a chance to hear from independent researchers and citizens explaning why this debate is being censored in Australia, and globally, and why these government vaccination policies cannot protect our health.

Judy Wilyman PhD Bachelor of Science, University of NSW Diploma of Education (Science), University of Wollongong Master of Science (Population Health), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Wollongong. PhD in The Science and Politics of the Australian Government's Vaccination Program, UOW School of Humanities and Social Inquiry.

The Mainsteam Media's Supporting Public Interest Research Censorship of the Vaccination Debate Did you know that in 1990 only 7 vaccines were used and the national immunisation program (NIP) was allocated $9.6 million to In Australia, universities today are working in expand this program. By 1993 this was partnerships with industry and even the estimated to cost $53 million to operate and heads of Departments and the researchers by 2008-9 it was costing the Australian have equity and patents in the research that government 'well in excess of $400 million' is performed at universities. This industry- (Terry Nolan 2010). academic partnership is now well 18/03/2021 Page 4

documented and it means that public interest research can be suppressed from the Terry Nolan was the Chair of the ATAGI mainstream media. vaccine advisory board from 2005-2014 who reported directly to the federal Health Minister This is particularly the case when there are for this decade. Here are the potential powerful lobby groups that push industry conflicts of interests he had with vaccine interests in government policies such as the manufacturers that were not provided to the Inc (and their offshoot public during this decade. SAVN) and the Friends of Science in Medicine (FoSM). These industry lobby He was also the Deputy Chair of the NHMRC groups have chosen deceptive names and for this decade and he influenced the they have a powerful voice in the mainstream allocation of funding for research and the media and with politicians such as Richard Di information being presented to doctors in the Natale - the leader of the Greens who Australian Immunisation Handbook. This promoted the NJNP/P policies in parliament handbook (Ed 10) has removed all references in 2013. prior to 2006 and after 2013. This means that valuable evidence about vaccines and our This has allowed the industry-lobby groups health has been removed and is being (who pose as 'consumer groups') to harass ignored in the government's promotion of and abuse academics and professionals in vaccination policies. This is the documnent public debates of this issue - with impunity. that the government is using to claim that all "vaccines are safe and effective". The Australian Health Practitioners Regulatory Authority (AHPRA) has stated My PhD thesis investigating the evidence for they will not invesitgate Dr. John the Australian government's vaccination Cunningham, a leader of SAVN, who made program was refused government funding in fabricated allegations and derogatory / false 2007. Further, it is only funded research that and unsupported comments about my is promoted to the public. Universities do not university research in the mainstream media promote student research to the public. and on social media. He has no special qualifications or publications in immunology This is why it became necessary to fund my or vaccination policy yet he received an OAM own website and newsletters in 2012 to in January 2016 for "Science and promote this independent research that is in Immunisation" after denigrating my academic the public interest. I would like to thank research on vaccination policy in the everyone who has supported my research mainstream media from 2014-2016. and newsletters over the last 5-10 years. If you have appreciated this unfunded research The University of Wollongong, that is in and debate of children's health I hope you will partnership with industry, does not have consider a $5 donation for the upkeep of my policies that require them to correct the false website and continuation of my voluntary information about university research that is newsletters. provided to the public by lobby groups in the mainstream media. The University has My website Vaccination Decisions became remained silent as unqualified journalists and necessary because the University of AMA doctors alike have denigrated my Wollongong is not required to rectify the research in the mainstream media - with false academic record to the public when and unsupported claims. organised industry-lobby groups provide false information about my university research in After I published my Newsletter 199 (25 May the mainstream media and when the industry- 2018) describing the false information that the funded Conversation website and PHAA SMH is promoting on the flu vaccine this Conference will not present this research in 18/03/2021 Page 5

article by Chris Del Mar and Peter Collignon their forums. appeared on the Conversation website. Many other academics and citizens, have been attempting to present these scientific arguments for debate from 2009 - 2017 on the Conversation website and in other public forums, but our scientific arguments are always framed as "anti-vaccination". Please visit Elizabeth Hart's, Over-Vaccination website, to see the conflicts of interest that are riddled through government vaccination policies.

The Conversation website is in partnership with the industry-funded universities and in 2014 it refused to publish my research on the HPV vaccine (promoted to prevent cervical cancer) that was showing the dangers of this vaccine. At the time my university research had been published in a medical journal and presented at two international conferences (San Francisco and London) - no reason was provided by the Conversation editor for declining my HPV vaccine article.

This vaccine is now being debated globally as dangerous to human health and unnecessary. It has also been removed from the national immunisation program of Japan for the health concerns that it poses and many class actions are occurring in other countries.

The Conversation website and its industry partners are now promoting themselves as "a not -for-profit charity" that brings you the facts from "real experts". This is how many medical institutions are also promoting themselves and it enables them to hide their links to industry funding and hence the biased information that they are presenting to the public.

It was refreshing to see this latest article by Collignon and Del Mar, on the lack of efficacy of flu vaccine which demonstrates that a debate on this topic is essential to protect public health.

18/03/2021 Page 6

Forward

Facebook Website

Email Judy Wilyman | http://us8.forward-to-friend.com/forward? u=f20605fde3732e41929f4a3f2&id=0b631f471f&e=fec8337d3c

Copyright © 2018 Judy Wilyman, All rights reserved. .You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website

18/03/2021