United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Case 1:12-cv-01924-JEB Document 13 Filed 03/21/13 Page 1 of 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ERIC OLSON, et al.,) ) Civil Action No. 12-1924 (JEB) Plaintiffs, ) )ECF v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant United States of America, by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully moves the Court to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety for lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, failure to state a claim or, in the alternative, to enter summary judgment in favor of Defendant, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1), 12(b)(3), 12(b)(6), and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 On January 18, 2012, Plaintiffs Eric and Nils Olson filed a claim with the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”) under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680, seeking $95,000,000 as compensatory damages for the agency’s alleged “negligent supervision” of its employees in connection with the death of their father, Dr. Frank Olson, in New York City in November 1953. On November 28, 2012, Plaintiffs filed the instant complaint after the CIA denied the FTCA claim. See Compl. (ECF 1). Plaintiffs, who do not reside in the District of Columbia, have failed to meet their burden of demonstrating that venue is proper in this jurisdiction based on alleged tortious conduct that 1 By filing this motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Defendant does not waive its right to assert any additional statutory defenses available under the Federal Tort Claims Act, any legal defenses to the underlying tort claim, or any common law defenses, such as laches.
[Show full text]