Destination Russia: Migration Policy Reform and Reality
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2006, Baden-Baden 2007, pp. 289-299. Delia Rahmonova-Schwarz Destination Russia: Migration Policy Reform and Reality Introduction Russia currently finds itself in a unique historical period in which mi- gration policy can become an important means of providing economic and demographic security and helping to sustain its development.1 Such were the concluding words at a conference on labour migration held in St. Petersburg on 1-2 July 2004. Two years later, on 30 June 2006, the State Duma approved the draft law “On Migration Registration of Foreign Citizens and Stateless Persons in the Russian Federation”. Following the Federation Council’s approval on 6 July 2006 and President Vladimir Putin’s endorse- ment on 18 July 2006, it will come into force on 15 January 2007. Migration has, in the meantime, become one of the most hotly debated issues in the pol- itical arena. President Putin, in his annual speech to the Federal Assembly on 11 May 2006, pointed out that the country was facing a demographic crisis and stressed the urgent need to introduce reforms in migration legislation to reverse current demographic trends.2 His advisor, Viktor Ivanov, said that he was concerned by “the African death rate and the European birth rate”3 in Russia. Indeed, the Russian population has been in constant decline since 1986 with a natural loss of 0.7 to 0.9 million since 1993. Besides creating the ne- cessary social conditions for improving the birth rate, the policy paper of the Russian Federation for the time period from the present until 2015, welcomes legislative measures that would facilitate registration and employment of for- eign citizens.4 The Social-Patriotic Party Rodina (“Motherland”) and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) voted against the draft law in March. Rodina criticized it as “an effective instrument to supplant the 1 Irina Ivakhnyuk, Zaklyuchitelnyi otchet mezhdunarodnogo seminara “Perspektivy trud- ovoi migratsii v Rossii i ee regionakh: prava migrantov v kontekste ekonomicheskogo i demograficheskogo razvitiya” [Concluding report on the international seminar “Perspec- tives on Labour Migration in Russia and Its Regions: Migrants’ Rights in the Context of Economic and Demographic Development”], p. 3, available online at http://www.uef.ru/ rus/chairs/stat/seminar2004.doc (author’s translation). 2 Cf. Putin’s State-of-the-Nation Address, at: http://www.fond-opk.orthodoxy.ru/publ/publ _view.php?publid=39 (in Russian). 3 Excerpts of Viktor Ivanov’s statements at the round table organized by the State Duma in April 2006. Material provided by Stringer Information Agency, at http://www.stringer.ru (in Russian; author’s translation). 4 See the Demographic Policy Paper of the Russian Federation for the time period until 2015, presented on 15 February 2001 at the meeting of the government of the Russian Federation, at: http://www.akdi.ru/ECONOM/akdi.HTM (in Russian). 289 In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2006, Baden-Baden 2007, pp. 289-299. indigenous population”.5 However, the opposition between pro-Putin forces, who supported the adoption of liberalization measures, and the group known as the Faction of Opposition Parties (i.e. Communists and Patriots), reflects only one side of a much larger picture. Beyond domestic politics there is in- deed an entire web of disputes relating to the management of migration in Russia. These range from violations of labour migrants’ rights by their em- ployers and the police, via the growing racist and xenophobic sentiments of the indigenous population, to recent foreign policy trends that have contrib- uted to the revision of legislation concerning migrants. The Russian Feder- ation has indeed acknowledged that it needs to carry out a significant reform of migration law to solve the economic, demographic, and social problems it now faces. With the new law on migration possibly on the way to coming into force, policy makers, international organizations, local analysts, and the media have raised the issue of Russia becoming no less an immigration country than the United States. Yet quite apart from the controversial reasons behind these reforms, to what extent are indigenous Russians willing to ac- cept foreigners? Can the legalization of a foreign labour force really benefit employers that are focused on maximizing profit? This paper takes a closer look at the mechanisms behind the Russian government’s intention to imple- ment measures to facilitate the regulation of migration. In doing so, it con- siders the realities of migration management and the repercussions that cur- rent policy reforms might have. The case of labour migrants from Central Asia will be the main focus. “Russia is Not a Way Station” – Attempts to Manage Undocumented Migration Labour migration from Central Asia to Russia has increased since the end of the 1990s as the Russian economy started to recover. As a result of the eco- nomic transition process, the infrastructure and education and health systems in the states of Central Asia deteriorated, causing labourers from the agricul- tural and construction sectors as well as professionals to migrate to Russia in search of work. Russia, now the second most popular destination for migrants following the United States, has an estimated 10.2 million undocumented mi- grants.6 There is no reliable information on the composition of the migrant population by ethnic origin, however, Caucasian and Central Asian citizens are believed to constitute the bulk of the immigrants to Russia, while Ukrainians, Moldovans, and Belarusians also represent a considerable seg- 5 Andrei Arkhipov, Pomoshchnik prezidenta Viktor Ivanov podvel chertu pod migrantami [Presidential Advisor Viktor Ivanov Draws the Bottom Line for Migrants], at: http.//www.stringer.ru/publication.mhtml?Part=37&PubID=5607 (author’s translation). 6 Assessment of the Federal Migration Service. Cf. V Rossii nakhodyatsya bolee 10 mil- lionov nelegalnykh migrantov [More than ten million illegal migrants in Russia], Ria No- vosti, 11 December 2006, at: http://www.rian.ru/society/20061211/56770101.html. 290 In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2006, Baden-Baden 2007, pp. 289-299. ment of Russia’s labour market. The demand for cheap labour in sectors such as construction, wholesale and retail trade, municipal and personal services, catering, and public transportation is considered to be the principal factor drawing migrants to Russia. With average economic growth of 6.4 per cent over the past several years, the Russian Federation has attracted millions of migrants from other parts the former Soviet Union. Despite emigration and depopulation, Russia’s policy makers are di- vided about allowing more migration to the country. The Communists and the Social-Patriotic Party raise doubts about the alleged economic benefits. They are anxious that the job market may marginalize Russian citizens and frightened by current levels of foreigners, let alone the continuing influx of migrants from the former USSR. “Prokhodnoi dvor” the Russian word for “way station” has the negative connotation of a terrain with no law or order. “My – ne prokhodnoi dvor” (“We are not a way station”), or “Rossiya – ne prokhodnoi dvor” (“Russia is not a way station”) are among the statements constantly reiterated by politicians, NGOs, the media, and a disgruntled population. The notion that the country could be turned into a lawless place of this kind by illegal migrants and incompetent politicians is also discern- able in the mainstream media. Far right groups such as the Russian Move- ment against Illegal Migrants and Immigrants use anti-migration propaganda to increase support for their nationalist ideologies.7 When considered in the context of the debate on “Fortress Europe”, i.e. the restrictive migration policies of the newly enlarged European Union, Russia’s not-a-way-station discourse might sound relatively welcoming at first.8 As Tatiana Yudina rightly argues, Russia’s demand for foreign labour is similar to that of European countries in the 1960-1970s.9 The current mi- gration legislation has not produced any positive results, and Russia, with heavy dependence on migrant labour to sustain its economy, cannot afford to adopt the same strict migration laws that some Western European states have. Russia is thus unlikely to close its doors to migrants completely. The labour deficit notwithstanding, Russia is still doing too little to adopt appropriate migration policies. In their policy paper to the World Bank, Yuri Andrienko and Sergei Guriev note that Russia still seems to be orienting itself towards the policy designs of the OECD countries that allow limited quota-based mi- gration, which might have a negative impact on the economy. The two 7 See, for example, the newspaper Sovetskaya Rossiya, at: http://www.sovross.ru/ 2006/06/ 06_4_1.htm, or at: http://www.rednews.ru/article.phtml?id=5222. The Russian National Union party (Russki Obshenatsionalni Soyuz, RONS) has been spreading the same anti- migrant messages. In May 2006, anti-migrant flyers with the words “Duma to Vote for Anti-Russian Law“ were distributed in the metro stations of Moscow. 8 Cf. among others Hans-Joachim Albrecht, Fortress Europe? – Controlling Illegal Immi- gration, in: European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Justice 1/2002, pp. 1-22, and Stefan Alsher, Knocking at the Doors of “Fortress Europe”. Migration and Border Control in Southern Spain and Eastern Poland, in: CCIS Working Paper Series, Working Paper 126, November 2005, at: http://www.ccis-ucsd.org/PUBLICATIONS/wrkg126.pdf. 9 Cf. Tatiana N. Yudina, Labour Migration into Russia: The Response of State and Society, in: Current Sociology 4/2005, p. 1. 291 In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2006, Baden-Baden 2007, pp. 289-299. scholars are concerned at the direction being taken by Russian migration policy and note that, since 2002, Russia has had in place migration regula- tions based on those in effect in Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands dur- ing the 1990s.