Botanica 2020, 26(1): 61–75
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CHENOPODIACEAE 藜科 Li Ke Zhu Gelin (朱格麟 Chu Ge-Ling)1; Sergei L
Flora of China 5: 351-414. 2003. CHENOPODIACEAE 藜科 li ke Zhu Gelin (朱格麟 Chu Ge-ling)1; Sergei L. Mosyakin2, Steven E. Clemants3 Herbs annual, subshrubs, or shrubs, rarely perennial herbs or small trees. Stems and branches sometimes jointed (articulate); indumentum of vesicular hairs (furfuraceous or farinose), ramified (dendroid), stellate, rarely of glandular hairs, or plants glabrous. Leaves alternate or opposite, exstipulate, petiolate or sessile; leaf blade flattened, terete, semiterete, or in some species reduced to scales. Flowers monochlamydeous, bisexual or unisexual (plants monoecious or dioecious, rarely polygamous); bracteate or ebracteate. Bractlets (if present) 1 or 2, lanceolate, navicular, or scale-like. Perianth membranous, herbaceous, or succulent, (1–)3–5- parted; segments imbricate, rarely in 2 series, often enlarged and hardened in fruit, or with winged, acicular, or tuberculate appendages abaxially, seldom unmodified (in tribe Atripliceae female flowers without or with poorly developed perianth borne between 2 specialized bracts or at base of a bract). Stamens shorter than or equaling perianth segments and arranged opposite them; filaments subulate or linear, united at base and usually forming a hypogynous disk, sometimes with interstaminal lobes; anthers dorsifixed, incumbent in bud, 2-locular, extrorse, or dehiscent by lateral, longitudinal slits, obtuse or appendaged at apex. Ovary superior, ovoid or globose, of 2–5 carpels, unilocular; ovule 1, campylotropous; style terminal, usually short, with 2(–5) filiform or subulate stigmas, rarely capitate, papillose, or hairy on one side or throughout. Fruit a utricle, rarely a pyxidium (dehiscent capsule); pericarp membranous, leathery, or fleshy, adnate or appressed to seed. Seed horizontal, vertical, or oblique, compressed globose, lenticular, reniform, or obliquely ovoid; testa crustaceous, leathery, membranous, or succulent; embryo annular, semi-annular, or spiral, with narrow cotyledons; endosperm much reduced or absent; perisperm abundant or absent. -
Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B. -
An Illustrated Key to the Amaranthaceae of Alberta
AN ILLUSTRATED KEY TO THE AMARANTHACEAE OF ALBERTA Compiled and writen by Lorna Allen & Linda Kershaw April 2019 © Linda J. Kershaw & Lorna Allen This key was compiled using informaton primarily from Moss (1983), Douglas et. al. (1998a [Amaranthaceae], 1998b [Chenopodiaceae]) and the Flora North America Associaton (2008). Taxonomy follows VASCAN (Brouillet, 2015). Please let us know if there are ways in which the key can be improved. The 2015 S-ranks of rare species (S1; S1S2; S2; S2S3; SU, according to ACIMS, 2015) are noted in superscript (S1;S2;SU) afer the species names. For more details go to the ACIMS web site. Similarly, exotc species are followed by a superscript X, XX if noxious and XXX if prohibited noxious (X; XX; XXX) according to the Alberta Weed Control Act (2016). AMARANTHACEAE Amaranth Family [includes Chenopodiaceae] Key to Genera 01a Flowers with spiny, dry, thin and translucent 1a (not green) bracts at the base; tepals dry, thin and translucent; separate ♂ and ♀ fowers on same the plant; annual herbs; fruits thin-walled (utricles), splitting open around the middle 2a (circumscissile) .............Amaranthus 01b Flowers without spiny, dry, thin, translucent bracts; tepals herbaceous or feshy, greenish; fowers various; annual or perennial, herbs or shrubs; fruits various, not splitting open around the middle ..........................02 02a Leaves scale-like, paired (opposite); stems feshy/succulent, with fowers sunk into stem; plants of saline habitats ... Salicornia rubra 3a ................. [Salicornia europaea] 02b Leaves well developed, not scale-like; stems not feshy; plants of various habitats. .03 03a Flower bracts tipped with spine or spine-like bristle; leaves spine-tipped, linear to awl- 5a shaped, usually not feshy; tepals winged from the lower surface .............. -
A Vascular Flora Inventory
A Vascular Flora Inventory Ottawa Sands Ottawa County Parks, Michigan September 2020 Prepared by William Martinus & Associates Financial assistance for this project was provided, in part, by the Coastal Management Program, Water Resources Division, Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, under the National Coastal Zone Management program, through a grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this report are those of the Ottawa County Parks & Recreation Commission and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Purpose 3 II. Overview 3 III. Plant Communities 4 IV. Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Species 5 V. Species Lists 7 VI. References 21 2 I. Introduction and Purpose Ottawa Sands, Ottawa County Parks, consists of 345 acres including an 80-acre inland lake, natural forests, coastal dunes, intermittent wetlands, inundated shrub swamp, and riparian marsh, shrub, and swamp communities. The eleven natural plant communities occurring on the site are listed along with hundreds of associated plant and animal species. - Ottawa Sands is located near the mouth of the Grand River in sections 17, 18 and 20 of Spring Lake Township, Ottawa County, in Western Michigan. - Property includes 5,585 feet of Grand River frontage. - A Floristic Quality Assessment demonstrates that a diverse and extremely high-quality plant component exists at Ottawa Sands. Purpose - To gain an understanding of the vegetative plant communities and flora of western Ottawa County and central west Michigan area. -
Ieva Akmane Krustziežu Dzimtas Cruciferae Juss
DAUGAVPILS UNIVERSITĀTE DZĪVĪBAS ZINĀTŅU UN TEHNOLOĢIJU INSTITŪTS BIOSISTEMĀTIKAS DEPARTAMENTS IEVA AKMANE KRUSTZIEŽU DZIMTAS CRUCIFERAE JUSS. TAKSONOMISKĀ REVĪZIJA LATVIJAS FLORĀ PROMOCIJAS DARBA KOPSAVILKUMS Zinātniskā doktora grāda, zinātnes doktora (Ph. D.) bioloģijā botānikas apakšnozarē iegūšanai DAUGAVPILS 2020 Promocijas darbs izstrādāts: Daugavpils Universitātes Sistemātiskās bioloģijas institūta Sistemātiskās botānikas laboratorijā no 2011.-2014. gadam, Daugavpils Universitātes Dzīvības zinātņu un tehnoloģiju institūta biosistemātikas departamentā no 2015.-2019. gadam un Latvijas Universitātes Bioloģijas institūtā no 2011. gada līdz 2019. gadam. Darba raksturs: promocijas darbs (disertācija) bioloģijas nozares botānikas apakšnozarē. Promocijas darba zinātniskais vadītājs: Dr. biol. vad. pētnieks Pēteris Evarts-Bunders (Daugavpils Universitāte) Darba recenzenti: 1. Dr. biol. vad. pētniece Anna Mežaka (Daugavpils Universitāte) 2. Dr. geogr. asoc. prof. Solvita Rūsiņa (Latvijas Universitāte) 3. Ph. D. pētniece Thea Kull (Igaunijas Dzīvības zinātņu Universitāte) Promocijas padomes priekšsēdētājs: Dr. biol. prof. Arvīds Barševskis Promocijas darba aizstāvēšana notiks: Daugavpils Universitātes Bioloģijas nozares promocijas padomes atklātajā sēdē 2020. gada 22. oktobrī Daugavpils Universitātē Parādes ielā 1a, 130. auditorijā, plkst. 12.00. Ar promocijas darbu un tā kopsavilkumu var iepazīties Daugavpils Universitātes bibliotēkā, Parādes ielā 1, Daugavpilī un https://du.lv/zinatne-un-petnieciba/promocija/aizstavesanai-iesniegtie- promocijas-darbi/ -
Corispermum) of the Prairie Provinces
PLANTS THE BUGSEEDS (CORISPERMUM) OF THE PRAIRIE PROVINCES Diana Bizecki Robson The Manitoba Museum, 190 Rupert Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 0N2; E-mail: <[email protected]> Introduction bugseed (C. americanum (Nutt.) Nutt. The bugseeds (Corispermum spp.) are var. americanum), Hooker’s bugseed (C. a genus of annual plants that are relatively hookeri Mosyakin var. hookeri), Pallas uncommon and favour sandy habitats, bugseed (C. pallasii Steven), and hairy such as sand dunes and disturbed sandy bugseed (C. villosum Rydb.).1 Older soils. The common name is a direct Canadian floras, such as Budd’s Flora2 translation of the Greek name (coris = bug, and Flora of Alberta3, typically recognize spermum = seed).1 Older floras considered two to four taxa (Table 1). However, several of the bugseed species in North the keys in these older floras are not America to be introduced from Europe, particularly useful for identifying the namely C. hyssopifolium L., C. nitidum new species. For example, what was Kit., and C. orientale Lam.2–5 However, called bugseed (C. hyssopifolium L.) in recent research on the genus, including Budd’s Flora could actually be American, palaeobotanical evidence, suggests that Hooker’s, or Pallas bugseed. Some of the the species found in North America are bugseed plants growing in the Athabasca native and unrelated to European flora, Sand Dunes in northern Saskatchewan sharing a closer affinity with eastern Asian appear to represent a fifth species for the species.6–8 Thus the scientific names prairies: Alaskan bugseed (C. ochotense that our Corispermum taxa were given Ignatov).8 Herbarium specimens of previously are now considered invalid; bugseed from that area observed by new names that more accurately reflect Dr. -
Baltic Botanic Gardens in 2015-2017 Estonia Latvia Lithuania
BALTIC BOTANIC GARDENS IN 2015-2017 ESTONIA LATVIA LITHUANIA ISBN 978-9934-18-464-2 Rīga, Latvia 2019 BALTIC BOTANIC GARDENS IN 2015-2017 ESTONIA LATVIA LITHUANIA Rīga, Latvia 2019 Baltic Botanic Gardens in 2015-2017. Periodical issue of the University of Latvia. Riga: University of Latvia Press, 2019, 120 pages. The periodical issue of Baltic Botanic Gardens includes information about the main events in the botanical gardens of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuanian in 2015-2017. It contains statistical information about the gardens and the articles about collections, research and public activities. The authors themselves are responsible for the content of papers. Supported by the project of the University of Latvia Biological diversity - effects, functions and protection subproject Ex situ investigations of plant diversity. Editor-in-Chief Dr. biol. Signe Tomsone Layout Lauma Strazdiņa Botanical Garden of the University of Latvia Str. Kandavas 2 Rīga, LV-1083 LATVIA © University of Latvia, 2019 ISBN 978-9934-18-464-2 CONTENTS REPORT OF DEVELOPMENT Botanical Garden of the University of Latvia 5 National Botanic Garden of Latvia 12 Kalsnava Arboretum 16 Tallinn Botanic Garden 18 Botanical Garden of the University of Tartu 25 Vilnius University Botanical Garden 27 Kaunas Botanical Garden of Vytautas Magnus University 33 Klaipėda University Botanical Garden 39 Šiauliai University Botanical Garden 42 ARTICLES Gunita Riekstiņa 45 Collection of wild rhododendron species at the University of Latvia Botanical Garden and Rhododendron Breeding and Experimental -
REPORT of Chornobyl Center for Nuclear Safety, Radioactive Waste and Radioecology
REPORT of Chornobyl Center for Nuclear Safety, Radioactive Waste and Radioecology On results of studies in 2017 on theme: Assessment of state and development tendencies of natural landscapes and biodiversity on the territoru of Chernobyl exclusion zone In framework of the UNEP-GEF project “Conserving, Enhancing and Managing Carbon Stocks and Biodiversity in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone” Reporting period 08.08.2017 – 31.12.2017 Agreement No. SSFA/2017/14 S1-32GFL-000370/11232/SB-000687.37/14AC0003 Signed: General Director of CC Bondarkov Mikhail D. 2017 Report of Chornobyl Center on UNEP-GEF project in 2017 2 CONTENT INTORDUCTION. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT .............................................................................. 4 MAIN DATA OF THE PROJECT .......................................................................................................................................... 4 MAIN GOAL..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 EXPECTED RESULTS OF THE PROJECT .............................................................................................................................. 4 DELIVERABLES. GENERAL GEOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CHEZ ................................................ 5 DIVERSITY OF ECOSYSTEMS AND LANDSCAPES ............................................................................................................... 5 WEATHER AND CLIMATE CONDITIONS IN CHEZ........................................................................................................... -
Landscape and Vegetation of Southern Baltic Dune Systems
Landscape and vegetation of southern Baltic dune systems: diversity, landuse changes and threats Jann Peyrat University of Kiel Cover: Dune landscape at the Nagliai Strict Nature Reserve, Curonian Spit, LT (Photo: Peyrat 2008). Aus dem Institut für Natur- und Ressourcenschutz der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Landscape and vegetation of southern Baltic dune systems: diversity, landuse changes and threats Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Agrar- und Ernährungswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christain-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Dipl. Landschaftsökologe Jann Peyrat aus Wilhelmshaven Kiel, den 17. März 2011 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Karin Schwarz 1. Berichtserstatter: Prof. Dr. Hartmut Roweck 2. Berichtserstatter: PD Dr. Maike Isermann Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 12. Mai 2011 Die Druckreife der vorliegenden Arbeit ist vorhanden. Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2 Plant communities of the Sundic Baltic Sand Dune ....................................... 35 Vegetation Complex on dry coastal dunes along the southern Baltic coast. Peyrat J. 2010. Botanica Lithuanica 16 (4): 149–167. Chapter 3 Neophytic Corispermum pallasii (Stev.) (Chenopodiaceae) ...................... 59 invading migrating dunes of the southern coast of the Baltic Sea. Dolnik C., J. Peyrat, A. Volodina and A. Sokolov. 2011. Polish Journal of Ecology 59 (2): 17-25. Chapter 4 Plant species diversity in dry coastal dunes of the Southern .................... 73 Baltic coast. Peyrat J. and A. Fichtner. submitted. Community Ecology. Chapter 5 Vegetation dynamics on the Łeba Bar/Poland: a comparison .................. 90 of the vegetation in 1932 and 2006 with special regard to endangered habitats. Peyrat J., M. Braun, C. Dolnik, M. Isermann and H. Roweck. 2009. Journal of Coastal Conservation 13 (4): 235–246. -
Corispermum ) in Canada
An Analysis of the Distribution, Ecology, and Status of Bugseeds (Corispermum ) in Canada DIANA BIZECKI ROBSON The Manitoba Museum, 190 Rupert Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 0N2 Canada; e-mail: [email protected] Robson, Diana Bizecki. 2010. An analysis of the distribution, ecology, and status of bugseeds ( Corispermum ) in Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist 124(3): 246 –255. The bugseeds ( Corispermum spp.) are a genus of annual plants that are uncommon due to their psammophilic, ruderal habit. Bugseeds are typically found in natural areas with some bare sand, like sand dunes, but are also present in anthropogenically impacted sandy or gravelly areas. Increasing dune stabilization may be causing the endangerment of some Bugseed species. Assessing the rarity of the five species in Canada is hindered by the lack of recently collected specimens and the use of out-dated nomenclature in herbaria. Specimens of bugseeds from major herbaria all across Canada were examined and re-identified using the most recent taxonomic treatment in the Flora of North America. Hairy Bugseed ( C. villosum ) was the most commonly collected taxon and Hooker’s Bugseed ( C. hookeri var. pseudodeclinatum ) the rarest. The natural distribution of all taxa, except Alaskan Bugseed ( C. ochotense ) which is only found in the far north, is from British Columbia to Ontario. Hairy, Hooker’s and American Bugseed ( C. americanum ) are also found in Quebec, where they may have been introduced from further west. Summaries of Bugseed localities and habitats, and distribution maps are presented to facilitate the status assessment of plants in this genus. Key Words: bugseeds, Corispermum , distribution, habitat, psammophile, status, Canada. -
Native Bugseed Species Corispermum Intermedium Schweigg and Alien Corispermum Pallasii Steven in Coastal Habitats of Latvia
Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp. 16 (2) 2016 ISSN 1407 - 8953 NATIVE BUGSEED SPECIES CORISPERMUM INTERMEDIUM SCHWEIGG AND ALIEN CORISPERMUM PALLASII STEVEN IN COASTAL HABITATS OF LATVIA - NEW KNOWLEDGES OF DISTRIBUTION AND INVASIONS Pēteris Evarts-Bunders, Gunta Evarte-Bundere, Aiva Bojāre, Dana Krasnopoļska, Māris Nitcis Evarts-Bunders P., Evarte-Bundere G., Bojāre A., Krasnopoļska D., Nitcis M. 2016. Native bugseed species Corispermum intermedium Schweigg and alien Corispermum pallasii Steven in coastal habitats of Latvia - new knowledges of distribution and invasions. Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp., 16 (2): 165 – 174. Corispermum is known as one of taxonomically most problematic genus in Chenopodiaceae and species identification is primarily based on fruit characters and presence or absence of perigonium. Six species were reported for the territory of Baltic countries and Latvia. The endemic species for Eastern Baltic region – C. intermedium Schweigg. is considered as typical for annual vegetation on embryonic shifting dunes and other coastal habitats, another species in similar habitats is the neophytic and invasive C. pallasii Steven. At the same time, the endemic C. intermedium is not officially protected in Latvia in spite of fact, that the population of our only native bugseed species is decreasing and the areal has been narrowing for several years due to natural reasons and as the result of human activities. It is completely clear, that remaining populations of C. intermedium in Latvia should be protected before the species becomes extinct as it happened in Poland and Russia. Key words: Corispermum, Latvia, endemic species, invasive species, coastal habitats, chorology. Pēteris Evarts-Bunders, Gunta Evarte-Bundere, Aiva Bojāre, Dana Krasnopoļska. -
Natural Areas Inventory 2006–2009
Natural areas iNveNtory 2006–2009 Volume 2 Table of Contents Abstract Acknowledgements Volume 1 1.0 Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………….…… 1-1 1.1 The Need ……………………………………………………………………………..… 1-1 1.2 Natural Areas in the Study …………………………………………………………… 1-2 1.3 Project Design …………………………………………………………………………. 1-3 1.3.1 ……………………………………………………………………….……………. 1-3 1.3.2 …………….………………………………………………………………….…… 1-3 1.3.3 ……………………………………………………………………….……………. 1-3 1.4 End Products ……………………………………………………………………….….. 1-4 1.5 Project Implementation …………………………………………………………..…… 1-4 1.5.1 Management Team …………………………………………………………… 1-5 1.5.2 Field Crew ……………………………………………………………………… 1-5 1.5.3 Project Committees …………………………………………………………… 1-5 1.6 Methodology ……………………………………………………………………….…… 1-6 1.6.1 Site Selection – Landowner Contact ………………………………………... 1-6 1.6.2 Wonderful Volunteers ………………………………………………….……... 1-7 1.7 Methodologies …………..……………………………………………………………... 1-7 1.7.1 Ecological Land Class (ELC) ……………………………………….............. 1-7 1.7.2 Data Entry and Compilation ………………………………………................ 1-8 1.7.3 Natural Area Sites and the Organization of Management Unit …………... 1-9 1.7.4 GIS Methodology for Delineation of the Community Series Polygons ….1-10 1.7.5 Wetland Evaluation Methodology of the Ministry of Natural Resources ..1-11 1.8 Project Funding ………………………………………………………………………. 1-14 1.9 Project Results and Recommendations …………………………………………….1-14 1.10 Significant Species …………………………………………………………………....1-16 1.11 Final Report Format ………………………………………………………………….. 1-17 2.0 Watershed Geologic Characterization ……………………………………………………….. 2-1 2.1 Southern Portion of the Study Area …………………………………………………. 2-1 2.1.1 Bedrock Geology ……………………………………………………………... 2-1 2.1.2 Surface Geology ………………………………………………………………. 2-2 2.2 Northern Portion of the Study Areas ……………………………………………….... 2-3 2.2.1 Bedrock Geology ……………………………………………………………... 2-3 2.2.2 Surface Geology …………………………………………………………….... 2-4 2.3 A Description of Geologic Features within the Study Area ……………………….