<<

W.wan.5-2 WLL: Wireless Local Loop

Access network Æ Local loop (subscriber loop) ‰Wired systems Wireless WAN: WLL & WiMax ¾ Twisted pair Æ coaxial cable Æ optical fiber ‰Wireless systems Module W.wan.5 ¾ WLL (Wireless Local Loop)

Dr.M.Y.Wu@CSE Dr.W.Shu@ECE Shanghai Jiaotong University University of New Mexico Shanghai, China Albuquerque, NM, USA

WLL architecture: Last-mile solution Source: Stalling2nd

© by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM 1

W.wan.5-3 W.wan.5-4 WLL: Wireless Local Loop WLL: Why better?

Scope of wireless coverage Lower cost ¾ PAN, 10m, 1Mbps ‰ are less expensive due to cost of cable installation that’s ¾ LAN, 100m, 10Mbps avoided ¾ MAN, 25km, 1-75Mbps Easy to install WLL = Wireless + MAN ‰ can be installed in a small fraction of the time required for a new wired system ‰ Narrowband – offers a replacement for existing services Selective installation ‰ Broadband – provides high-speed two-way voice and data ‰ radio units installed for subscribers who want service at a service given time Stationary or mobile? ¾ while with a wired system, cable is laid out in anticipation of serving every subscriber in a given area ‰ Fixed Æ Portable Æ Mobil

© by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM © by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM W.wan.5-5 W.wan.5-6 WLL: physical characteristics Channel requirements: LOS & NLOS

WLL mainly uses millimeter wave frequencies (2 GHz LOS: Line-of-sight to about 30 GHz) ‰ Higher Frequencies range: up to 66 GHz ‰ Good things ‰ Fixed dish points straight at WiMax tower from a rooftop or pole. ¾ There are wide unused frequency bands available above 25 GHz ‰ Service is stronger and more stable, capable to send a lot of data ¾ At these high frequencies, wide channel bandwidths can be used, with fewer errors. providing high data rates ‰ At higher frequencies, less interference and more bandwidth ¾ Small size transceivers and adaptive antenna arrays can be used NLOS: Non-line-of-sight ‰ Not so good things (propagation): ‰ Lower Frequency range: 2-11 GHz ¾ Free space loss increases with the square of the frequency; losses ‰ A small antenna on computer connects to a tower. are much higher in millimeter wave range ‰ Lower wavelength transmissions are not as easily disrupted by ¾ Attenuation effects due to rainfall and atmospheric or gaseous physical obstructions. absorption are large ‰ They are better able to diffract, or bend around obstacles. ¾ Multipath losses can be quite high In general, >10GHz can be LOS, <10GHz can be LOS or NLOS

© by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM © by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM

W.wan.5-7 W.wan.5-8 MDS: Multipoint Distribution Service MDS: Multipoint Distribution Service

PMP: Point to Multipoint Distribution Two commonly used WLL: LMDS & MMDS: ‰A single antenna transceiver is used to link to many users LMDS: Local multipoint distribution service ‰ Appeals to larger companies with greater bandwidth ‰Contrast to cellular system demands ¾ Broadband instead of telecommunication oriented, data oriented MMDS: Multichannel multipoint distribution ¾ Mostly stationary (fixed) instead of mobile users, so no handoff service ‰ Also referred to as wireless cable ¾ Cells do not overlap, frequency can be reused ‰ Used mainly by residential subscribers and small ¾ Classified as MAN instead of WAN in scope businesses

© by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM © by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM W.wan.5-9 W.wan.5-10 LMDS MMDS

‰ 28GHz in USA, 40GHz in Europe, millimeter-wave spectrum ‰ 2.5GHz licensed, and 5.8GHz unlicensed, centemeter-wave ‰ High frequency, smaller cell spectrum ‰ Lower frequency, larger cell size (50 km), equipment less expensive size (2 km), LOS ‰ Relatively lower data ‰ Relatively high data rates (27-36Mbps) rates (155Mbps) ‰ MMDS signals with larger ‰ Capable of providing wavelengths can travel video, telephony, farther without losing and data significant power ‰ Relatively low cost in ‰ MMDS signals don't get comparison with blocked as easily by objects cable alternatives and are less susceptible to rain absorption ‰ OFDM can improve data rate

© by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM © by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM

W.wan.5-11 W.wan.5-12 LMDS & MMDS IEEE802 suite

Spectrum allocations in USA IEEE 802 --- PAN/LAN/MAN Standards ‰ Wired Frequency, GHz Allocations ¾ 802.3 (Ethernet) 2.1500—2.1620 MMDS, licensed, 2 bands of 6 MHz each ‰ Wireless 2.4000—2.4835 ISM, unlicensed ¾ 802.11: Wireless LAN ™ WiFi 2.5960—2.6440 MMDS, licensed, 8 bands of 6 MHz each ¾ 802.15: Wireless PAN 2.6500—2.6800 MMDS, licensed ™ Bluetooth 5.7250—5.875 ISM-UNII, unlicensed, used for MMDS too ¾ 802.16: Wireless MAN 24.000—24.250 ISM, unlicensed ™ WiMAX 27.500—31.300 LMDS, licensed, ¾ 802.20: Vehicular Mobility ? ™ MobilFi ISM = Industrial, Scientific, and Medical Downloads ( 6 months after publication) UNII = Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802

© by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM © by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM W.wan.5-13 W.wan.5-14 WiMAX & 802.16 WiMAX & 802.16

WiMAX = WLL + Standardization Technology considerations ‰ Use point-to-multipoint architecture with stationary rooftop ‰ Licensed vs unlicensed or tower-mounted antennas ‰ LOS vs NLOS ‰ Æ Worldwide interoperability for Access WiMAX ‰ Half-duplex vs full-duplex ‰ Standard: IEEE 802.16 ‰ P2P, P2MP, Mesh ‰ Frequency spectrum ‰ Fixed, portable, mobile ¾ 10-66 GHz, LMDS, ‰ Cost performance LOS, licensed ¾ ¾ 2-11 GHz, MMDS, throughput = channel bandwidth (Hz) X bits/Hz NLOS, licensed & unlicensed ‰ Last-mile tech? ‰ Last-mile technology: metropolitan area in scale ¾ WiFi backhaul ‰ Can serve as backhaul for wireless LANs (802.11) ¾ T1 replacement ¾ 3G/ replacement?

© by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM © by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM

W.wan.5-15 W.wan.5-16 WiMAX/802.16 vs WiFi/802.11 WiMAX/802.16 vs 3G

WiMAX/802.16 Technology WiFi/802.11b/g 2-11 GHz Spectrum 2.4 GHz WiMAX/802.16 Technology 3G Licensed, unlicensed unlicensed Broadband < 50 km (typical 5km) Range < 200m Laptop centric Client Phones & laptops Outdoor LOS & NLOS Coverage Indoor short range Fixed to portable mobility / mobility 5bps/Hz peak Data rate 2.7bps/Hz peak LOS or NLOS Channels NLOS < 100Mbps in 20 MHz < 54Mbps in 20MHz Optimized for data Services Optimized for voice Hundreds CPE Scalability Tens CPE WiMAX Æ potential 4G??? On demand: A/V,data QoS No Connection oriented Connection type Connectionless TDD/FDD Full duplex No TDMA Multiple access CSMA/CA

© by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM © by Dr.Wu@SJTU & Dr.Shu@UNM