63 93 2 37 ( )
(Conocarpus erectus L.) 4 3 2 *1
( [email protected] ) : *1 2 3 4 91 11/ 17/ : 90 12/ /30 : Conocarpus ) . 1388 ( erectus L. )0 . ( 10 )0 5/2 5 5/7 ( 20 15 10 5 . 4 20 . 66 67 50 6/ 20 . 62 1/ 20 42 8/ 51 8/ - . . . . Conocarpus erectus . : (. 1998 1 . . ) 1- Esmaili & Zare-Maivan
64 ... :
.( 1996 6 ) - ( 1387 ) ) .( 2005 1 (gropyron gaertn ) ) ( Brassica napus ) . (Festuca arundinacea ) ( (Agropyron gaertn ) ( Festuca arundinacea ) . 2 . . Cynodon dactylon ) (Cyperus alternifolius ) ( .( 2004 7 ) . ( 2009 ) 8 . 10 5/2 5 napus var.oleifera ) . Avena sativa ) Brassica ( ( . 47/1 . ( 50 ) .( 1995 3 ) . 4 ) .(2005 . . . 9 ) .( 1998 .( 2002 5 ) (. 2004 10 )
6- Harris et al. 1- Cho & SEO 7- Escalante-Espinosa et al. 2- Phytoremediation 8- Wyskowski & Zilkowska 3- Inze & Vanmontagu 9- Chirkova et al . 4- Hepler 10- Mckersie 5- Adam & Dunkan 65 93 2 37 ( )
) 5/1 pH= 4/7 3 . ( 5/1 1 ) .( 2002 - . ) .( 1388 5/2 5 5/7 ) - ( 10 - 4 ( 20 15 10 5 ) . 90 ) . . ( Conocarpus L . 2 ( Combretaceae ) erectus APX ( )
. 90 (APX ) ) . ( 1981 ) 3 .( 1387 - ( APX ) CECIL CE 2501 . . ( MDA ) 4 4 1388 5 Conocarpus erectus L. - ( 1968 ) ( TBA ) ( ) . . ( 1976 ) 6 26 56 15 27 )
± 2- Ascorbate Peroxidase Enzyme Activity 33 5 ( 12 3- Nakano & Asada . 4- Tiobarbitoric acid 5- Heath & Packer 6- Bradford 1- Sanders et al .
66 ... :
.( 2 ) . ( 1998 ) 1
- : ( ) =EC 1/EC 2×100 2 =Ec 1 3 ( ) 90 = Ec 2 - /0 518 ) ( 20 ) SPSS16 ( 67 . . 5 /0 283 . /0 781 15 10 1 ( ) . 20 5 - 15 10 . . : Conocarpus erectus L . . )5 .( 3 ) APX ** 5 ( . ( /0+ 936 ) ** 5/7 (+ /0 313 ) ** ** (+ /0 698 ) (+ /0 247 ) 10 . . - 5/2 10 . . 15 . 1- Dionisio-sese & Tobita 67 93 2 37 ( )
5/2 5/2 5 . 20 ) . 5 ( . 10 5/7 . 20 15 10 20 10 10 5/2 5 5/7 3(. ) . : : 3.( ) 5 . 15 10 10 - 10 . . 10 10 20 10 5/7 10 10 5 5/7 5 . 10 : 20 . 5/2 5/7 5 10 . 5/2 5 5 .
68 ... :
Conocarpus erectus L 1 APX ...
ns 12 /801 ** 473 /48 ** 9/795 ** 2/420 0/09 ** 0/377 ** 4
24 /948 ** 2611 /497 ** 47 /7** 32 /548 * 0/064 * 0/309 ** 4
3/255 ** 267 /901 ** 14 /414 ** 41 /659 ** 0/077 ** 0/308 ** 16
0/162 14 /463 2/169 12 /826 0/012 0/028 75
5 % * 1% ** Conocarpus erectus L. 2 APx
:
1
1 +0/936 ** ns ns 1 0/090 0/051
ns ns ns 1 +0/036 0/068 0/096
ns ns 1 +0/180 0/041 +0/247 ** +0/313 ** APx ns ns 1 +0/698 ** +0/106 0/028 +0/347 ** +0/467 **
1% ** 5% * ns 68 69 93 2 37 ( )
3 Conocarpus erectus ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) / ) ( ) ) ( ( / (
a a bcd c a a 7/88 71 /64 13 /51 18 /83 0/781 1/59 0 cde a bc abc cdef defghi 6/31 71 /99 13 /87 22 /28 0/444 0/905 2/5 bc ab bcde abc bcd cdef 6/94 67 /07 13 /08 26 /84 0/538 1/068 5 0 bcd bc bcd abc def fghi j 6/58 60 /7 13 /58 21 /373 0/321 0/715 7/5
bc cd bcd abc bcd ab 7/06 56 13 /46 24 /50 0/539 1/45 10 klm fgh bc abc ef ij 3/85 38 /92 14 /16 22 /73 0/283 0/598 0 ijk i cdefg abc bcde defg 4/54 24 /89 11 /33 20 /69 0/515 1/029 2/5 jkl fgh g abc abc bcde 4/23 38 /07 9/06 24 /09 0/583 1/138 5 5 klm e fg abc f hij 3/86 47 /92 9/87 24 /0 0/248 0/606 7/5 efg c cdefg a ab abc 6/13 59 /1 11 /51 28 /333 0/691 1/407 10 o gh defg abc cdef defghij 2/75 35 /35 10 /56 25 /76 0/403 0/88 0 defg gh bcdef abc bcde bcde 5/77 36 /50 12 /75 24 /24 0/515 1/135 2/5 lmn gh g c def ghij 3/60 36 9/16 19 /09 0/332 0/69 6 5 10 ghi gh bcdefg abc def ghij 5/18 36 /60 11 /98 26 /49 0/310 0/681 7/5 ab ef bcdefg abc bcdef cde 7/14 45 /42 12 /16 20 /92 0/473 1/076 10 mno h efg c bcde defg 3/25 32 /8 10 /09 18 /94 0/515 1/030 0 lmn e bcde fg bc cdef efghij 3/62 48 /32 12 /16 19 /44 0/437 0/84 2/5 hij efg bc abc cdef efghij 4/89 43 /21 14 /27 20 /41 0/407 0/827 5 15 efgh e bc abc bcde bcde 5/54 48 /46 14 /20 23 /03 0/519 1/106 7/5 fgh bc b abc abc bcde 5/42 61 /7 15 /11 21 /71 0/588 1/128 10 no gh a ab f j 2/98 35 /39 19 /30 27 /34 0/261 0/518 0 lmn gh bcdef abc cdef de fgh 3/63 36 /92 12 /83 24 /96 0/436 0/964 2/5 klm h bcde abc abc bcd 3/97 33 /9 13 /25 25 /68 0/623 1/223 5 20 ijkl h bc bc def ghij 4/41 34 /5 14 /20 19 /85 0/334 0/697 7/5 efg de bc bc def hij 5/75 50 /67 14 /56 19 /78 0/307 0/651 10 5 5/7 . . - . ) - .
70 ... :
20 . 5/2 (. 2009 5 5 . . 5/7 . ) - .( 2002 1 . . 10 10 ) APX .( 2002 2 . 15 .( 1996 3 ) 5 - 10 5/7 APX 5/2 .( 2002 ) 20 . 5 . . 10 5 5/7 10 . 15 . . 10 5/7 5 . . 1 -Sairam & Srivastava 2- Arora et al. 3- Smirnoff 71 93 2 37 ( )
.( 2005 ) (erectus L Conocarpus) . .( 1387 ) . ( Conocarpus erectus L.) .
. 1387 . . . . . . . . 1. 44. 12:
. 1388 . . . . . . 2. . 452 429 : .
60. : 1 . 1380 . 3.
. 1387 . . . 4. . 1:22
5. Adam, G., and Duncan, H. 2002. Influence of diesel fuel on seed germination. Journal Environmental, 120: 363-370. 6. Arora, A., Sairam, R.K., and Srivastava, G.C. 2002. Oxidative stress and antioxidant system in plants. Annual Review of Current Science, 82: 1227-1238.
7. Blokhin, O., Virolainen, E., and Fagerstedt, K. 2003. Antioxidant oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress. Review Annuals of Botany. 91: 179-194.
8. Bradford, M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry. 72: 248-252.
72 ... :
9. Chirkova, T., Novitskaya, V., and Blokhina, O.B. 1998. Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant systems under anaerobic in plants differing in their tolerance to oxygen deficiency. Russion Journal of Plant Physiology, 45: 55-62.
10. Cho, U., and Seo, N. 2005. Oxidative stress in Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to cadmium is due to hydrogen peroxide accumulation. Plant Science, 168: 113-120. 11. Dionisio-Sese, M.L., and Tobita, S. 1998. Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Science, 135:1-9. 12. Escalante-Espinosa, E., Gallegos-Martinez, M.E., Favela-Torres, E., and Gutierrez- Rojas, M. 2004. Improvement of the hydrocarbon phytoremediation rate by Cyperus laxus Lam. inoculated with a microbial consortium in a model system. Journal of Chemosphere, 59: 405–413. 13. Esmaili, A., and Zare-Maivan, H. 1998. Environmental pollution of Iran as a consequence of the Iraq – Kuwait war. Educational and Research: Ministry of Jahad Sazandegi, 5: 43-50. 14. Harris, J.A., Birch, P., and Palmer, J. 1996. Land restoration and reclamation principles and practice. Addison Wesley/Longman, 12: 34-67 .
15. Heath, R.L., and Packer, L. 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stochiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Biochemistry, 125: 189-198. 16. Hepler, P.K. 2005. A Central of plant growth and development. Plant Physiology, 17: 2142-2155.
17. Inze, D., and Vanmontagu, M. 1995. Oxidative stress in plants. Plant Physiology, 6: 53-158.
18. Joner, E.J., and Leyval, C. 2001. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on clover and ryegrass grown together in soil spiked with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Journal Mycorrhiza, 10: 155-159. 19. Knight, H., Trewavas, A.j., and knight, M.R. 1996. Cold calcium signaling in Arabidopsis in volves two cellular pools and a chang in calcium signature after acclimation. Plant Cell, 8: 489-503.
20. Mckersie, B.D.S. 2004. Water-deficit tolerance and field performance of transgenic alfalfa overexpressing ascorbate peroxidase. Plant Physiology, 111: 1177-1181.
21. Nakano, Y., and Asada, K. 1981. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate- specific peroxidases in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiology, 22: 867-880. 22. Palmroth, M.R.T., Pichtel, J., and Puhakka, J.A. 2002. Phytoremediation of sub-arctic soil contaminated with diesel fuel. Journal of Bioresource Technology, 84: 221-28. 23. Pulford, I.D., and Watson, C. 2003. Phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated land by tree a review. Journal of Environmental, 29: 529-40. 73 93 2 37 ( )
24. Rababah, A., and Matsuzawa, S. 2002. Treatment system for solid matrix contaminated with fluoranthene 11 recirculating photodegradation techniques. Journal of Chemosphere, 46: 49-57. 25. Ryan, K.M., Mary, K., and Firestone, M. 2001. Enhanced phenanthrene biodegradation in soil by slender oat root exudates and root debris. Journal of Environmental, 30: 1911-1918. 26. Sairam, R.K., and Srivastava, G.C. 2002. Changes in antioxidant activity in sub- cellular fractions of tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes in response to long term salt stress. Plant Science, 162: 897-904. 27. Sanders, D., Pelloux, J., Brownlee, C., and Harper, J.F. 2002. Calcium at the cross roads of signaling. Plant Cell Physiology, 14: 401– 417. 28. Sheen, J. 1996. Ca +2 - dependent protein kinases and stress signal transduction in plants. Plant Physiology, 274: 1900-1902.
29. Siddiqui, S., and Adams, W.A. 2001. The Fate of diesel hydrocarbons in soils and their effect on the germination of Perennial Ryegrass. Journal of Environmental, 118: 49- 62.
30. Smirnoff, N. 1996. The Function and metabolism of ascorbic acid in plants. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 78: 661- 669.
31. Van Epps, A. 2006. Phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons. U.S. Environmental Protection, 173 p.
32. Wyszkowski, M., and Zi lkowska, A. 2009. Role of compost, bentonite and calcium oxide in restricting the effect of soil contamination with petrol and diesel oil on plants. Journal of Chemosphere, 74: 860–865.