DOCSLIB.ORG

Nevada Supplement Revised October 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nevada Supplement Revised October 2000 CERL Special Report 96/009 October 1995 Revised October 2000 US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research and Development Center The Environmental Assessment and Management (TEAM) Guide Nevada Supplement Revised October 2000 Environmental assessments help determine compliance with current environmental regulations. The U.S. Air Force, U.S. Army, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), and Corps of Engi- neers (Civil Works) have adopted environmental compliance programs that identify compliance problems before they are cited as violations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Since 1984, the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, in cooperation with numerous Department of Defense (DOD) components, has developed environmental compliance assessment checklist manuals. The Environmental Assessment and Management (TEAM) Guide was developed for use by all DOD components. Currently there are five participating DOD components: the Air Force, Air National Guard, Army, Civil Works, and DLA. These agencies have agreed to share the development and maintenance of this Guide. The Guide combines Code of Federal Regulations and management practices into a series of checklists that show legal requirements and the specific operations or items to review. TEAM Guide is supplemented by DOD component- specific manuals detailing DOD component regulations and policies. The Nevada Supplement was developed to be used in conjunction with the TEAM Guide, using existing Nevada state environmental legislation and regulations as well as suggested management practices. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. FOREWORD This is USACERL Special Report 96/09. The report is based on the information available on Enflex Federal and State Regulations of August 2000. The research was performed for the Air National Guard under Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR) number OMAF57/3400/357/A/9830147/PO, technical monitor Chuck Smith; and the U.S. Postal Service under MIPR number 102590-99-Z-093, technical monitor Paul Fennewald. The research was performed by the Environmental Processes Branch (CN-E), Installations Division (CN), of the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL). The CERL Principal Investigator was Carolyn O’Rourke. Dr. Ilker Adiguzel is Chief, CN-E, and Dr. John T. Bandy is Chief, CN. The associated Technical Director is Gary Schanche. Mr. Bill Goran is Acting Director of CERL. CERL is an element of the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Director of ERDC is Dr. James R. Houston, and the Commander is COL James S. Weller. 1 Introduction 2 Introduction NOTICE This manual is intended as general guidance for personnel at Department of Defense (DOD) installations/CW facilities. It is not, nor is it intended to be, a complete treatise on environmental laws and regulations. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information contained herein. For any specific questions about, or interpretations of, the legal references herein, consult appropriate legal counsel. 3 Introduction 4 Introduction NEVADA SUPPLEMENT The Nevada Supplement to the U.S. TEAM Guide contains the protocols necessary for determining compliance with Nevada environmental regulations. This manual is a supplement to the U.S. TEAM Guide; it does not replace the Guide. The following Nevada agencies issue regulations and have responsibility in the areas indicated. • Department of Agriculture - administers the pesticide program and certification of applicators. • Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) - manages most of the state’s environmental programs. The DCNR’s Environmental Protection Divisions has sections which administer the air quality, water pollution, solid and hazardous waste, groundwater, and underground storage tank programs. The Water Resources Division administers all water use issues. The Division of Emergency Management (702/687-4240 and 702/687-5300) is the responsible agency for spills of oil and hazardous substances. The DCNR also regulates POLs, PCBs, and asbestos. • Division of Forestry and Division of Wildlife - oversees the endangered plant and wildlife programs. • State Historic Preservation Office, Department of Museums, Library, and Arts - is responsible for the preservation of historic properties, archaeological and Native American site, and collection management and curation. 5 Introduction 6 Introduction ACRONYMS ACGIH American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists AQMA air quality management area ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials AWWA American Water Works Association BACT best available control technology BOD biochemical oxygen demand BTEX benzene, toluene, elthylbenzene, xylene CAR control area responsible party CAS Chemical Abstract Service CEM continuous emission monitoring CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFC chlorofluorocarbons CWA Clean Water Act dB decibel dBA decibels using A-weighting network dBC decibels using C-weighting network DEQ Department of Environmental Quality ESA Endangered Species Act FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act GVWR gross vehicle weight rating HEPA Filter high efficiency particulate air filter HWM hazardous waste management IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer ICRU International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements IUPAC International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry LAER lowest achievable emission rate Ldn day-night airport noise level Leq equivalent noise level LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas MC medium curing MCL maximum contaminant level MFL million fibers per liter MSDS material safety data sheet MSW municipal-type solid waste MSWLF municipal solid waste landfill MWC municipal waste combustor NBS National Bureau of Standards NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NFPA National Fire Protection Association NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NTNCWS nontransient noncommunity water system OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PCB polychlorinated biphenyl PEL permissible exposure limit POTW publicly owned treatment works PUC Public Utility Commission of Oregon RACT reasonably available control technology 7 Introduction ACRONYMS RC rapid curing RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RDF refuse-derived fuel REL recommended exposure level RGF recirculating gravel filter RVP Reid vapor pressure SAE Society of Automotive Engineers SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act SC slow curing SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act SIC Standard Industrial Classification SMCL secondary maximum contaminant level SPCC spill prevention countermeasure and control SPL sound pressure level SWDA Solid Waste Disposal Act TLV threshold limit value TNTC too numerous to count TPH total petroleum hydrocarbons TRI toxic release inventory TSCA Toxic Substance Control Act TSD treatment, storage, and disposal TSDF treatment, storage, and disposal facility TSP total suspended particulate TSS total suspended solids TTHM total trihalomethane UL Underwriters Laboratory UFC Uniform Fire Code USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency UST underground storage tank VOC volatile organic compound VOL volatile organic liquid WPCF Water Pollution Control Facilities 8 Introduction COMMONLY USED ABBREVIATIONS bbl barrel mg milligram Btu British thermal unit mi mile C Celsius min minute cfs cubic feet per second MJ megajoule cm centimeter mL milliliter cm2 square centimeter mm millimeter dscf dry standard cubic foot mo month dscm dry standard cubic meter mrem millirem F Fahrenheit MW megawatt ft foot ng nanogram ft2 square feet NTU nephelometric turbidity unit ft3 cubic feet oz ounce g gram pCi picoCurie gal gallon ppm part per million gJ gigajoule ppmv part per million by volume gr grain ppmw part per million by weight h hour psi pound per square inch ha hectare psia pounds per square inch absolute hp horsepower psig pounds per square inch gauge in. inch qt quart J Joule s second kg kilogram scf standard cubic foot km kilometer scm standard cubic meter kPa kilopascals sdcf standard dry cubic foot L liter sdcm standard dry cubic meter lb pound TU turbidity unit m meter V volt m3 cubic meter yd yard MBtu million British thermal units yd2 square yard meq milligram equivalent yr year CO carbon monoxide NO2 nitrogen dioxide CO2 carbon dioxide NOx nitrogen oxides Hg mercury SO2 sulfur dioxide 9 Introduction 10 Introduction METRIC CONVERSION TABLE The following conversion table may be used throughout this manual to make approximate conversions between U.S. units and metric units. 1 in. = 2.54 cm or 25.4 mm 1 ft = 0.3048 m 1 ft2 = 0.093 m2 1 ft3 = 0.028 m3 1 psi = 6.895 kPa 1 lb = 0.454 kg 1 mi = 1.61 km 1 gal = 3.78 L °F = (°C + 17.78) x 1.8 °C = 0.55 (°F - 32) 1 yd = 0.9144 m 1 Btu = 4.184 kJ 1 acre = 4046.9 m2 1 acre = 0.405 hectare 11 Introduction Comment Form Comments and questions regarding the Nevada Supplement can be addressed to: Carolyn O’Rourke e-mail [email protected] phone 217-398-5553 or 1-800-USACERL fax 217-373-3430 Please include the following information with your comment: User Name: Affiliation (installation, command, etc.): email: Phone: FAX: Page # Checklist item # Line # Comments Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species Assessment for Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas)
    SPECIES ASSESSMENT FOR BOREAL TOAD (BUFO BOREAS BOREAS ) IN WYOMING prepared by 1 2 MATT MCGEE AND DOUG KEINATH 1 Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3023 2 Zoology Program Manager, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3013; [email protected] drawing by Summers Scholl prepared for United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Cheyenne, Wyoming March 2004 McGee and Keinath – Bufo boreas boreas March 2004 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 NATURAL HISTORY ........................................................................................................................... 4 Morphological Description ...................................................................................................... 4 Taxonomy and Distribution ..................................................................................................... 5 Habitat Requirements............................................................................................................. 8 General ............................................................................................................................................8 Spring-Summer ...............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • ENDANGERED SPECIES: Groups Petition FWS to List Amargosa Toad (02/28/2008)
    ENDANGERED SPECIES: Groups petition FWS to list Amargosa toad (02/28/2008) April Reese, Land Letter Western reporter The Amargosa toad should be added to the federal endangered species list, according to a petition filed Tuesday with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by environmental groups. In their petition, filed Feb. 26, the Center for Biological Diversity and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility argue that urban development, water diversions and increased off- road vehicle use throughout the toad's range in Nevada's Oasis Valley have pushed the species toward extinction. According to the groups, the Amargosa toad is already restricted to a 10-mile stretch of the Amargosa River -- one of Nevada's last free- flowing rivers -- and adjacent desert uplands. "It only has a small amount of habitat," said Daniel Patterson, PEER's southwest director, who formerly worked for the Bureau of Land Management in Nevada as an ecologist. "It's got no where to go. There's really no room for error." FWS considered listing the toad in the 1990s after receiving a petition from environmental groups but decided the species did not warrant Males tend to be smaller, reaching 3 to 4 inches, while federal protection. At the time, FWS concluded females may reach 3.5 to 5 inches. Unlike most frogs and toads, the Amargosa toad is voiceless except for “release that the toad was more widespread than the calls” or chirps made by males when grasped below their petition suggested, although it also said more forelimbs by another toad or human. Photo courtesy of FWS.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Threatened Fishes in Warner Basin, Oregon
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 50 Number 3 Article 5 10-31-1990 Conservation status of threatened fishes in arnerW Basin, Oregon Jack E. Williams Division of Wildlife and Fisheries, Bureau of Land Management, Washington, D.C. Mark A. Stern The Nature Conservancy, Portland, Oregon Alan V. Munhall Bureau of Land Management, Lakeview, Oregon Gary A. Anderson Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Lakeview, Oregon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Williams, Jack E.; Stern, Mark A.; Munhall, Alan V.; and Anderson, Gary A. (1990) "Conservation status of threatened fishes in arnerW Basin, Oregon," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 50 : No. 3 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol50/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Creat &Isio N:l.luraUst 50(3), 1900, pp. 243-248 CONSERVATION STATUS OF THREATENED FISHES IN WARNER BASIN, OREGON 1 l 3 Jack E. Williams , MarkA. Stern \ Alan V. Munhall , and Cary A. Anderson"" A8S'TRACT.-Two fedemlJy listed fisbes, the Foskett speckled daceand Warnersucker, are endemic to Warner Basin in south central Oregon. The Foskett speckled dace is native only to a single spring in Coleman Valley. Anearby'spring was stocked with dace in 1979 and 1980, and now provides a second population. The present numbers ofdace probably are at their Wgbest levels since settlement ofthe region.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprinodon Nevadensis Mionectes Ash Meadows Amargosa Pupfish
    Ash Meadows Amargosa pupfsh Cyprinodon nevadensis mionectes WAP 2012 species due to impacts from introduced detrimental aquatc species, habitat degradaton, and federal endangered status. Agency Status NV Natural Heritage G2T2S2 USFWS LE BLM-NV Sensitve State Prot Threatened Fish NAC 503.065.3 CCVI Presumed Stable TREND: Trend is stable to increasing with contnued on-going restoraton actvites. DISTRIBUTION: Springs and associated springbrooks, outlow stream systems and terminal marshes within Ash Meadows Natonal Wildlife Refuge, Nye Co., NV. GENERAL HABITAT AND LIFE HISTORY: This species is isolated to warm springs and outlows in Ash Meadows NWR including Point of Rocks, Crystal Springs, and the Carson Slough drainage. Pupfshes feed generally on substrate; feeding territories are ofen defended by pupfshes. Diet consists of mainly algae and detritus however, aquatc insects, crustaceans, snails and eggs are also consumed. Spawning actvity is typically from February to September and in some cases year round. Males defend territories vigorously during breeding season (Soltz and Naiman 1978). In warm springs, fsh may reach sexual maturity in 4-6 weeks. Reproducton variable: in springs, pupfsh breed throughout the year, may have 8-10 generatons/year; in streams, breeds in spring and summer, 2-3 generatons/year (Moyle 1976). In springs, males establish territories over sites suitable for ovipositon. Short generaton tme allows small populatons to be viable. Young adults typically comprise most of the biomass of a populaton. Compared to other C. nevadensis subspecies, this pupfsh has a short deep body and long head with typically low fn ray and scale counts (Soltz and Naiman 1978). CONSERVATION CHALLENGES: Being previously threatened by agricultural use of the area (loss and degradaton of habitat resultng from water diversion and pumping) and by impending residental development, the TNC purchased property, which later became the Ash Meadows NWR.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Weeds Threaten Rare Toad and a Small Town's Economy
    INVASIVE WEED AWARENESS COALITION (IWAC) Invasive Weeds Threaten Rare Toad and a Small Town’s Economy n 1994, residents near Nevada’s Oasis Valley learned that a native amphibian, the Amargosa Toad, had been nominated for the endangered species list. As the only habitat where the small, rare toad resides, Oasis Valley is home to the one of the few wet portions of the United States’ longest under- ground river, the Amargosa. The 12-mile stretch of river provides shallow, clear water that the toad needs to live and reproduce. Increasing infestations of invasive weeds threaten this water supply and its unique Rare Amargosa Toads call the Oasis Valley home. inhabitant. Challenge: With a grant from the National Association of ILocated near the town of Beatty, Nevada, the Counties (NACO), the groups are implementing a Oasis Valley area has a long history of ranching comprehensive weed management plan to and mining. Placing the Amargosa Toad on the re-establish a natural habitat and educate the endangered species list would put many residents’ community about the situation. In particular, the livelihoods at risk. Caught between the desire to plan is targeting two non-native weeds — saltcedar save the Amargosa Toad from extinction and the (Tamarix ramosissima), and Russian olive (Elaeagnus need to protect the area’s economic well-being, angustifolia) — that stand out as the greatest residents needed to act quickly to find a viable threats to the river’s water supply. These two inva- solution for all involved. sive weeds can crowd out native vegetation and consume massive amounts of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas) a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Boreal Toad (Bufo boreas boreas) A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project May 25, 2005 Doug Keinath1 and Matt McGee1 with assistance from Lauren Livo2 1Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, P.O. Box 3381, Laramie, WY 82071 2EPO Biology, P.O. Box 0334, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Keinath, D. and M. McGee. (2005, May 25). Boreal Toad (Bufo boreas boreas): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/ assessments/borealtoad.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Deb Patla and Erin Muths for their suggestions during the preparation of this assessment. Also, many thanks go to Lauren Livo for advice and help with revising early drafts of this assessment. Thanks to Jason Bennet and Tessa Dutcher for assistance in preparing boreal toad location data for mapping. Thanks to Bill Turner for information and advice on amphibians in Wyoming. Finally, thanks to the Boreal Toad Recovery Team for continuing their efforts to conserve the boreal toad and documenting that effort to the best of their abilities … kudos! AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES Doug Keinath is the Zoology Program Manager for the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, which is a research unit of the University of Wyoming and a member of the Natural Heritage Network. He has been researching Wyoming’s wildlife for the past nine years and has 11 years experience in conducting technical and policy analyses for resource management professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Cascades Frog SOC X X Mountain Meadows, Bogs, Ponds Or
    Taxa Species Species SMU/ESU/D Federal State BM CP CR EC KM NR WC WV NS Special needs Limiting factors Data gaps Conservation actions Key reference or plan, if available Common Scientific PS/Group Listing listing Name Name Status status Amphibian Cascades SOC X X Mountain meadows, bogs, ponds or potholes Montane species vulnerable to genetic Habitat requirements and how they may vary by Maintain connectivity of habitat. Monitor effects of fish http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/ frog above 2,400 feet elevation. Requires access isolation. Experiencing substantial elevation within the species' range. Habitat stocking and water quality on populations. Carefully manage psw_gtr244/psw_gtr244.pdf to permanent water. Lays eggs in shallow reductions in southern parts of range characteristics that could enhance migration livestock grazing in occupied wet meadows. Use prescribed sunny edges of ponds, or on low vegetation (e.g., CA). Potentially sensitive to and gene flow. Feeding habits. Effects of burning or hand-felling of trees periodically to set plant near ponds where warm sunlight speeds egg waterborne pathogens. pathogens airborne environmental pollution. succession. If reintroductions are warranted, use individuals development. Larvae may “school” in large Feasibility studies on reintroduction at historic from nearby populations and consult results of feasibility masses. sites. studies. Conservation actions in Oregon are particularly valuable given reductions in other parts of range. Amphibian Cascade X X Cold, fast-flowing, clear, permanent headwater Larvae take several years to reach sexual Basic inventory, abundance and population Maintain stream buffers to maintain cool water Howell, B.L. and N. M. Maggiulli. 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 198/Thursday, October 12, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 198 / Thursday, October 12, 2000 / Proposed Rules 60607 designation of critical habitat. We note appointment, during normal business data and comments are available for that emergency listing and designation hours at the above address. public inspection, by appointment, of critical habitat are not petitionable during normal business hours at the References Cited actions under the Act. Based on the above address. information presented in the petition, You may request a complete list of all FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the habitat loss and other threats to the references we cited, as well as others, Jason Davis or Maria Boroja at the species have been long-standing and from the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office ongoing for many years. There are no Office (see ADDRESSES section). (see ADDRESSES section above), or at imminent, devastating actions that Author: The primary author of this (916±414±6600. document is Catherine Hibbard, could result in the extinction of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: species. Therefore, we find that an Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office emergency situation does not exist. The (see ADDRESSES section). Background 12-month finding will address the issue Authority: The authority for this action is Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Endangered of critical habitat. the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Public Information Requested (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), requires that the Dated: October 5, 2000. Service make a finding on whether a The Service hereby announces its Jamie Rappaport Clark, petition to list, delist, or reclassify a formal review of the species' status Director, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office 2600 SE 98th Avenue, Suite 100 Portland, Oregon 97266 Phone: (503) 231-6179 FAX: (503) 231-6195 Reply To: 8330.F0047(09) File Name: CREP BO 2009_final.doc TS Number: 09-314 TAILS: 13420-2009-F-0047 Doc Type: Final Don Howard, Acting State Executive Director U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency, Oregon State Office 7620 SW Mohawk St. Tualatin, OR 97062-8121 Dear Mr. Howard, This letter transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) Biological and Conference Opinion (BO) and includes our written concurrence based on our review of the proposed Oregon Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) to be administered by the Farm Service Agency (FSA) throughout the State of Oregon, and its effects on Federally-listed species in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Your November 24, 2008 request for informal and formal consultation with the Service, and associated Program Biological Assessment for the Oregon Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (BA), were received on November 24, 2008. We received your letter providing a 90-day extension on March 26, 2009 based on the scope and complexity of the program and the related species that are covered, which we appreciated. This Concurrence and BO covers a period of approximately 10 years, from the date of issuance through December 31, 2019. The BA also includes species that fall within the jurisdiction of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries Service).
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph R. Tomelleri 28 27
    Nevada 29 34 35 32 2 31 30 3 1 33 20 18 6 4 19 5 8 17 16 12 7 23 15 24 9 21 25 22 10 26 14 13 11 41 36 39 40 38 37 Illustrations by JOSEPH R. TOMELLERI 28 27 N A T I V E F I S H E S O F N E V A D A G R O U P IN G S B Y F A M ILY KILLIFISHES ∙ Cyprinodontidae 11. Big Spring spinedace ∙ Lepidomeda mollispinis pratensis† POOLFISHES ∙ Empetrichthyidae 31. Mountain sucker ∙ Catostomus platyrhynchus 1. Devils Hole pupfish ∙ Cyprinodon diabolis* 12. Moapa dace ∙ Moapa coriacea* 22. Preston White River springfish ∙ Crenichthys baileyi albivallis 32. Warner sucker ∙ Catostomus warnerensis† 2. Ash Meadows Amargosa pupfish ∙ Cyprinodon nevadensis mionectes* 13. Woundfin ∙ Plagopterus argentissimus* 23. Hiko White River springfish ∙ Crenichthys baileyi grandis* 33. Wall Canyon sucker ∙ Catostomus sp. 3. Warm Springs Amargosa pupfish ∙ Cyprinodon nevadensis pectoralis* 14. Colorado pikeminnow ∙ Ptychocheilus lucius* 24. Moapa White River springfish ∙ Crenichthys baileyi moapae 34. Cui-ui ∙ Chasmistes cujus* 25. Railroad Valley springfish ∙ Crenichthys nevadae† 35. Razorback sucker ∙ Xyrauchen texanus* MINNOWS ∙ Cyprinidae 15. Northern pikeminnow ∙ Ptychocheilus oregonesis 26. Pahrump poolfish ∙ Empetrichthys latos* 4. Desert dace ∙ Eremichthys acros† 16. Relict dace ∙ Relictus solitarius TROU T S ∙ Salmonidae 17. Moapa speckled dace ∙ Rhinichthys osculus moapae 5. Humpback chub ∙ Gila cypha* S CUL P INS ∙ Cottidae 36. Mountain whitefish ∙ Prosopium williamsoni 18. Ash Meadows speckled dace ∙ Rhinichthys osculus nevadensis* † 6. Bonytail chub ∙ Gila elegans* 27. Mottled sculpin ∙ Cottus bairdii 37. Lahontan cutthroat trout ∙ Onchorhynchus clarkii henshawi 19. White River speckled dace ∙ Rhinichthys osculus ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Guam Marine Biosecurity Action Plan
    GuamMarine Biosecurity Action Plan September 2014 This Marine Biosecurity Action Plan was prepared by the University of Guam Center for Island Sustainability under award NA11NOS4820007 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coral Reef Conservation Program, as administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management and the Bureau of Statistics and Plans, Guam Coastal Management Program. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Guam Marine Biosecurity Action Plan Author: Roxanna Miller First Released in Fall 2014 About this Document The Guam Marine Biosecurity Plan was created by the University of Guam’s Center for Island Sustainability under award NA11NOS4820007 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coral Reef Conservation Program, as administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management and the Bureau of Statistics and Plans, Guam Coastal Management Program. Information and recommendations within this document came through the collaboration of a variety of both local and federal agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program (CRCP), the University of Guam (UOG), the Guam Department of Agriculture’s Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources (DAWR), the United States Coast Guard (USCG), the Port Authority of Guam, the National Park Service
    [Show full text]