A Survey of Autonomous Vehicles: Enabling Communication Technologies and Challenges
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
sensors Review A Survey of Autonomous Vehicles: Enabling Communication Technologies and Challenges M. Nadeem Ahangar 1, Qasim Z. Ahmed 1,*, Fahd A. Khan 2 and Maryam Hafeez 1 1 School of Computing and Engineering, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK; [email protected] (M.N.A.); [email protected] (M.H.) 2 School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Department of Transport in the United Kingdom recorded 25,080 motor vehicle fatali- ties in 2019. This situation stresses the need for an intelligent transport system (ITS) that improves road safety and security by avoiding human errors with the use of autonomous vehicles (AVs). There- fore, this survey discusses the current development of two main components of an ITS: (1) gathering of AVs surrounding data using sensors; and (2) enabling vehicular communication technologies. First, the paper discusses various sensors and their role in AVs. Then, various communication tech- nologies for AVs to facilitate vehicle to everything (V2X) communication are discussed. Based on the transmission range, these technologies are grouped into three main categories: long-range, medium- range and short-range. The short-range group presents the development of Bluetooth, ZigBee and ultra-wide band communication for AVs. The medium-range examines the properties of dedicated short-range communications (DSRC). Finally, the long-range group presents the cellular-vehicle to everything (C-V2X) and 5G-new radio (5G-NR). An important characteristic which differentiates each category and its suitable application is latency. This research presents a comprehensive study of AV technologies and identifies the main advantages, disadvantages, and challenges. Citation: Ahangar, M.N.; Ahmed, Q.Z.; Khan, F.A.; Hafeez, M. A Survey Keywords: autonomous vehicles; Bluetooth; dedicated short-range communications; intelligent of Autonomous Vehicles: Enabling transport system; V2I; V2V; V2X; VANET; vehicular communications; ultra-wide band; ZigBee Communication Technologies and Challenges. Sensors 2021, 21, 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030706 1. Introduction Academic Editor: Fatih Kurugollu and Francisco J. Martinez Technology facilitates humans, improves productivity and leads to a better quality Received: 18 December 2020 of life. Technological developments and automation in vehicular networks will lead to Accepted: 18 January 2021 better road safety and lower congestion in present urban areas where the traditional Published: 21 January 2021 transport system is becoming increasingly disorganised and inefficient [1]. Therefore, the development of the intelligent transport systems (ITS) concept has been proposed, with the Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu- aim and focus on improving traffic safety and providing different services to its users [2,3]. tral with regard to jurisdictional clai- There has been considerable research in ITS resulting in significant contributions (see [4] ms in published maps and institutio- and references therein). Figure1 shows the three main applications of the ITS system: (1) nal affiliations. Applications for transport efficiency; (2) Safety-critical applications; and (3) Infotainment applications. The main task of the transport efficiency application includes the calculation of the optimal speed and the route to navigate the vehicle to the destination by taking into account the traffic information [5]. Safety-critical applications deal with the response to Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Li- censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. emerging vehicles and intersection collision avoidance [5]. Infotainment applications deal This article is an open access article with cooperative local services such as the location of petrol stations, hotels, etc. [5]. distributed under the terms and con- One of the most significant contributions towards the ITS has been the development ditions of the Creative Commons At- of autonomous vehicles (AVs). These vehicles perceive the environment through sensing tribution (CC BY) license (https:// using various sensors, and then this information is utilised to drive without the need for creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ any human intervention [6]. In Figure2, the technical evolution of AVs is illustrated in 4.0/). detail. The modern cruise control system was developed in 1948 and since then self-driving Sensors 2021, 21, 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030706 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors Sensors 2021, 21, 706 2 of 33 cars have been gradually developing different features [7,8]. Significant developments were made in the early 2000s when the lane departure warning system (LDWS), adaptive cruise control (ACC), self-parking assistance (SPA), auto-pilot and traffic sign recognition (TSR) were developed for AVs [9–11]. It is planned that by 2022 we will have intelligent speed adaptation systems and by 2030 fully automated AVs will be available with no driver backup required. This advancement will further lead to the next emerging and evolutionary stage of the Internet of vehicles (IoV). In IoV networks, besides human as users of the Internet, physical sensors, machine-type devices and vehicles will be the users of the IoV ecosystem. Figure 1. Different applications for intelligent transport system (ITS). Figure 2. Technical evolution in autonomous cars. The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) classified the vehicles into six different levels of automation. The same classification is also adopted by other organisations such as the International Organisation of Motor Vehicle Manufacturer (OICA) and the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt). The US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) initially had a different classification, as compared in Table1[12]. Since then, NHTSA has also adopted SAE’s six levels of automation in the Federal Automated Vehicle Policy. Levels 0–2 can be broadly categorised as driver assisted, while Levels 3 and 4 can be termed as semi-automatic and Level 5 is fully autonomous. The detailed features of each level are described below: • Level 0 is not automated, and all the tasks are performed by the driver. • Level 1 provides driver assistance with some functions such as ACC, TSR, etc., but the driver controls the accelerator and the brakes while monitoring the surroundings. • Level 2 provides partial driving assistance, and the vehicle can perform the steer- ing and acceleration functions. However, the driver is responsible for many safety- critical actions. • Level 3 provides conditional driving automation where the vehicle performs the entire monitoring of the surroundings. The driver is no longer responsible for safety- critical issues. Sensors 2021, 21, 706 3 of 33 • Level 4 provides high driving automation, and the driver holds control only if the automated situation turns unsafe. Steering, braking, acceleration and surrounding check are performed by the vehicle. • Level 5 represents complete automation where there is no need for human intervention and the driver is a passenger. Figure3 summarises the above discussed features and functions achieved at each level according to the SAE J3016 standard [12]. Table 1. Comparison between different automation levels. Organisation Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 BASt, SAE, Driver Driver Partial Conditional High Full OICA Only Assisted Automation Automation Automation Automation NHSTA No Function Combined Limited Fully Specific Function Self-Driving Self-Driving Figure 3. Different levels of automation. Autonomous vehicles have several advantages including improved safety and lower road congestion resulting in lower fuel/energy consumption [4,6]. Besides these advan- tages, there are some issues which need to be resolved for AVs such as who bears the legal responsibilities of the AVs, what will the course of action be if the AV controller is hacked, etc. A summary of the main pros and cons of AVs are listed in Table2. Overall, it can be claimed that, if the drawbacks are resolved or minimised, then autonomous cars will be a considerable technological development in coming years as they will facilitate people’s lives and increase road safety [10,13]. This paper aims to review the advancement of autonomous cars focusing on the various sensors deployed in them along with the different communication technologies employed. Therefore, the objectives of this survey are as follows: • To identify and describe the different type of sensors used in AVs. • To classify communication technologies based on their transmission range and identify their main advantages and disadvantages. This implies: 1. Discussing short-range technologies such as Bluetooth, ZigBee and ultra-wide band (UWB) 2. Assessing medium-range technologies such as dedicated short-range communi- cation (DSRC) and Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi) 3. Analysing long-range technologies such as Cellular Vehicle To Everything (C- V2X) and Fifth Generation-New Radio (5G-NR) technology The survey is organised as follows. Section2 presents the literature review. Section3 discusses the system architecture for the AVs with emphasis on the various types of sensors. Section4 analyses the Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) and the Vehicle- to-Everything (V2X) technologies. Section5 discusses the classification of the different wireless technologies based on the transmission range and their applications and challenges Sensors 2021, 21, 706 4 of 33 in AVs and ITS. Finally,