DOCSLIB.ORG

Curriculum Vitae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Curriculum Vitae 1 Refereed publications (1978 - present): 1. Messina, F.J. 1978. Mirid fauna associated with old-field goldenrods (Solidago: Compositae) in Ithaca, N.Y. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 86: 137-143. 2. Messina, F.J. & R.B. Root. 1980. Association between leaf beetles and meadow goldenrods (Solidago spp.) in central New York. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 73: 641-646. 3. Messina, F.J. 1981. Aggregation behavior of Aplomyiopsis xylota (Diptera: Tachinidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 89: 197-201. 4. Messina, F.J. 1981. Plant protection as a consequence of an ant-membracid mutualism: interactions on goldenrod (Solidago sp.). Ecology 62: 1433-1440. 5. Messina, F.J. 1982. Timing of dispersal and ovarian development in goldenrod leaf beetles, Trirhabda virgata and T. borealis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 75: 78-83. 6. Messina, F.J. 1982. Comparative biology of the goldenrod leaf beetles, Trirhabda virgata LeConte and T. borealis Blake (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Coleopterists Bulletin 36: 255-269. 7. Messina, F.J. 1982. Food plant choices of two goldenrod beetles: relation to plant quality. Oecologia 55: 342-354. 8. Messina, F.J. 1983. Parasitism of two goldenrod beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) by Aplomyiopsis xylota (Diptera: Tachinidae). Environmental Entomology 12:807-809. 9. Root, R.B. & F.J. Messina. 1983. Defensive adaptations and natural enemies of a case-bearing beetle, Exema canadensis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Psyche 90: 67-80. 10. Messina, F.J. 1983. Response of a goldenrod beetle to four seldom encountered goldenrod (Solidago) species. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 91: 269-272. 11. Messina, F.J. & J.A.A. Renwick. 1983. Effectiveness of oils in protecting stored cowpeas from the cowpea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 76: 634-636. 12. Messina, F.J. 1984. Influence of cowpea pod maturity on the oviposition choices and larval survival of a bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 35: 241-248. 13. Messina, F.J. & J.A.A. Renwick. 1985. Dispersal polymorphism of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): variation among populations in response to crowding. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 78: 201-206. 14. Messina, F.J. & J.A.A. Renwick. 1985. Ability of ovipositing seed beetles to discriminate between seeds with differing egg loads. Ecological Entomology 10: 225-230. 15. Messina, F.J. & J.A.A. Renwick. 1985. Mechanism of egg recognition by the cowpea weevil Callosobruchus maculatus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 37: 241-245. 2 16. Messina, F.J., J.A.A. Renwick & J.L. Barmore. 1985. Resistance to Aphis craccivora (Homoptera: Aphididae) in selected varieties of cowpea. Journal of Entomological Science 20: 263-269. 17. Messina, F.J. & J.A.A. Renwick. 1985. Resistance to Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in selected cowpea lines. Environmental Entomology 14: 868-872. 18. Messina, F.J. 1987. Genetic contribution to the dispersal polymorphism of the cowpea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 80: 12-16. 19. Messina, F.J., J.L. Barmore & J.A.A. Renwick. 1987. Oviposition deterrent from eggs of Callosobruchus maculatus: spacing mechanism or artifact? Journal of Chemical Ecology 13: 219-226. 20. Messina, F.J., J.L. Barmore & J.A.A. Renwick. 1987. Host selection by ovipositing cowpea weevils: patterning of input from separate sense organs. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 43: 169-173. 21. Messina, F.J. 1989. Host-plant variables influencing the spatial distribution of a frugivorous fly, Rhagoletis indifferens. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 50: 287-294. 22. Messina, F.J. & R. Mitchell. 1989. Intraspecific variation in the egg-spacing behavior of Callosobruchus maculatus. Journal of Insect Behavior 2: 727-742. 23. Messina, F.J. 1989. Genetic basis of variable oviposition behavior in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 82: 792-796. 24. Messina, F.J. 1989. Host preferences of hawthorn- and cherry-infesting flies of Rhagoletis pomonella in Utah. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 53: 89-92. 25. Messina, F.J. 1990. Components of host choice by two Rhagoletis species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Utah. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 63: 80-87. 26. Messina, F.J. & V.P. Jones. 1990. Relationship between fruit phenology and infestation by the apple maggot (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Utah. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 83: 742-752. 27. Messina, F.J. 1990. Alternative life-histories in Callosobruchus maculatus: environmental and genetic bases. In: K. Fujii, A.M.R. Gatehouse, C.D. Johnson, R. Mitchell, and T. Yoshida (eds.), Bruchids and Legumes: Economics, Ecology and Coevolution. pp. 303-315. Kluwer Academic, The Netherlands. 28. Messina, F.J. 1991. Life-history variation in a seed beetle: adult egg-laying vs. larval competitive ability. Oecologia 85: 447-455. 29. Messina, F.J., S.L. Gardner & G.E. Morse. 1991. Host discrimination by egg-laying seed beetles: causes of population differences. Animal Behaviour 41: 773-779. 30. Messina, F.J., D.G. Alston & V.P. Jones. 1991. Oviposition by the western cherry fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in relation to host development. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 64: 197-208. 31. Messina, F.J. 1991. Competitive interactions between larvae from divergent strains of the cowpea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Environmental Entomology 20: 1438-1443. 3 32. Messina, F.J. & T.R. Tinney. 1991. Discrimination between ‘self’ and ‘non-self’ eggs by egg-laying seed beetles: a reassessment. Ecological Entomology 16: 509-512. 33. Messina, F.J., J.L. Kemp & J.A. Dickinson. 1992. Plasticity in the egg-spacing behavior of a seed beetle: effects of host deprivation and seed patchiness (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 5: 609-621. 34. Messina, F.J. & J.A. Dickinson. 1993. Egg-laying behavior in divergent strains of the cowpea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): time budgets and transition matrices. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 86: 207-214. 35. Messina, F.J. 1993. Winter mortality of the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) on range grasses in northern Utah. Great Basin Naturalist 53: 310-313. 36. Messina, F.J., T.A. Jones & D.C. Nielson. 1993. Seasonal variation in the performance of the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) on alternate hosts. Environmental Entomology 22: 1022-1030. 37. Messina, F.J. 1993. Effect of initial colony size on the per-capita growth rate and alate production of the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 66: 365- 371. 38. Messina, F.J. 1993. Heritability and ‘evolvability’ of fitness components in Callosobruchus maculatus. Heredity 71: 623-629. 39. Messina, F.J., T.A. Jones & D.C. Nielson. 1993. Performance of the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) on perennial range grasses: effects of previous defoliation. Environmental Entomology 22: 1349-1354. 40. Chiu, Y. & F.J. Messina. 1994. Effect of experience on host preference in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): variability among populations. Journal of Insect Behavior 7: 503-515. 41. Paton, P.W.C., F.J. Messina & C.R. Griffin. 1994. A phylogenetic approach to reversed size dimorphism in diurnal raptors. Oikos 71: 492-498. 42. Messina, F.J. & J.K. Subler. 1995. Conspecific and heterospecific interactions of male Rhagoletis flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on a shared host. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 68: 206-213. 43. Messina, F.J., T.A. Jones & D.C. Nielson. 1995. Host plant affects the interaction between the Russian wheat aphid and a generalist predator, Chrysoperla carnea. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 68: 313-319. 44. Messina, F.J., J.H. Richards & E.D. McArthur. 1996. Variable responses of insects to hybrid versus parental sagebrush in common gardens. Oecologia 107: 513-521. 45. Bergeson, E. & F.J. Messina. 1997. Resource- vs. enemy-mediated interactions between cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) on a common host plant. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 90: 425-432. 4 46. Messina, F.J., T.A. Jones & D.C. Nielson. 1997. Host-plant effects on the efficacy of two predators attacking Russian wheat aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environmental Entomology 26: 1398-1404. 47. Messina, F.J. & A.F. Slade. 1997. Inheritance of host-plant choice in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 90: 848-855. 48. Messina, F.J. 1998. Maternal influences on larval competition in insects. In: T.A. Mousseau and C.W. Fox (eds.), Maternal Effects as Adaptations. pp. 227-243. Oxford University Press, New York. 49. Clark, T.L. & F.J. Messina. 1998. Plant architecture and the foraging success of ladybird beetles attacking the Russian wheat aphid. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 86: 153-161. 50. Bergeson, E. & F.J. Messina. 1998. Effect of a co-occurring aphid on the susceptibility of the Russian wheat aphid to lacewing predators. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 87: 103-108. 51. Clark, T.L. & F.J. Messina. 1998. Foraging behavior of lacewing larvae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on plants with divergent architectures. Journal of Insect Behavior 11: 303-317. 52. Messina, F.J., & J.B. Hanks. 1998. Host plant alters the shape of the functional response of an aphid predator (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environmental Entomology 27: 1196-1202. 53. Messina, F.J. & A.F. Slade. 1999. Expression of a life-history trade-off in a seed beetle depends on environmental context. Physiological Entomology 24: 358-363. 54. Throne, J.E., J.E. Baker, F.J. Messina, K.J. Kramer & J.A. Howard. 2000. Varietal resistance. In: B. Subramanyam and D.W. Hagstrum (eds.), Alternatives to Pesticides in Stored-Product IPM. pp. 165-192. Kluwer Academic, Boston. 55. Messina, F.J. & S.M. Sorenson. 2001. Effectiveness of lacewing larvae in reducing Russian wheat aphid populations on susceptible and resistant wheat. Biological Control 21: 19-26. 56. Messina, F.J. & C.W. Fox. 2001. Offspring size and number.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Utilizing Novel Grasslands for the Conservation and Restoration Of
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2014 Utilizing novel grasslands for the conservation and restoration of butterflies nda other pollinators in agricultural ecosystems John Thomas Delaney Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Recommended Citation Delaney, John Thomas, "Utilizing novel grasslands for the conservation and restoration of butterflies and other pollinators in agricultural ecosystems" (2014). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 14097. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/14097 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Utilizing novel grasslands for the conservation and restoration of butterflies and other pollinators in agricultural ecosystems by John Thomas Delaney A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program of Study Committee: Diane M. Debinski, Major Professor David M. Engle Mary A. Harris Amy L. Toth Brian J. Wilsey Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2014 Copyright © John Thomas Delaney, 2014. All rights reserved. ii Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to all of my family, friends, and mentors who have helped me along in this journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysomelidae, Coleoptera)
    THE DONACIINAE, CRIOCERINAE, CLYTRINAE, - ~ CHLAMISINAE, EUMOLPINAE, AND CHRYSOMELINAE OF OKLAHOMA (CHRYSOMELIDAE, COLEOPTERA) by JAMES HENRY SHADDY \\ Bachelor of Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August, 1964 I OKLAHOMA lfAT&: UNNE.RSITf . LIBRARY JAN 8 lSGS THE DONACIINAE, CRIOCERINAE, CLYTRINAE, CHLAMISINAE, EUMOLPINAE, AND CHRYSOMELINAE OF OKLAHOMA (CHRYSOMELIDAE, COLEOPTERA) Thesis Approved: 570350 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ..... 1 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 3 SYSTEMATICS ... 4 LITERATURE CITED 45 ILLUSTRATIONS 47 INDEX • • • . 49 iii INTRODUCTION The leaf beetles form a conspicuous segment of the coleopterous fauna of Oklahoma. Because no taxonomic paper on the Chrysomelidae existed for the state, the present work with the subfamilies Donaciinae, Criocerinae, Clytrinae, Chlamisinae, Eumolpinae, and Chrysomelinae of the eleven subfamilies found in Oklahoma was inaugurated. The chrysomelids are a large family of small or medium-sized beetles. They are generally host specific and sometimes cause extensive damage to field crops and horticultural plants. However, the Donaciinae, Clytrinae, and Chlamisinae are of little economic interest. The economically important species belong to the Criocerinae, Eumolpinae, and·Chrysomelinae. The larvae and adults of these feed on the foliage of plants, except the larvae of Eumolpinae which are primarily rootfeeders. Included in this work are 29 genera contain- ing 59 species of which 54 species are known to occur in the state and five. species are likely to occur here. I wish to thank my major advisor, Dr. William A. Drew, for his encouragement, guidance and assistance, and the other committee members, Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomy of the Side Species Group of Spilochalcis (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) in America North of Mexico with Biological Notes on a Representative Species
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1984 The taxonomy of the side species group of Spilochalcis (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) in America north of Mexico with biological notes on a representative species. Gary James Couch University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Couch, Gary James, "The taxonomy of the side species group of Spilochalcis (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) in America north of Mexico with biological notes on a representative species." (1984). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 3045. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/3045 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TAXONOMY OF THE SIDE SPECIES GROUP OF SPILOCHALCIS (HYMENOPTERA:CHALCIDIDAE) IN AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO WITH BIOLOGICAL NOTES ON A REPRESENTATIVE SPECIES. A Thesis Presented By GARY JAMES COUCH Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 1984 Department of Entomology THE TAXONOMY OF THE SIDE SPECIES GROUP OF SPILOCHALCIS (HYMENOPTERA:CHALCIDIDAE) IN AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO WITH BIOLOGICAL NOTES ON A REPRESENTATIVE SPECIES. A Thesis Presented By GARY JAMES COUCH Approved as to style and content by: Dr. T/M. Peter's, Chairperson of Committee CJZl- Dr. C-M. Yin, Membe D#. J.S. El kin ton, Member ii Dedication To: My mother who taught me that dreams are only worth the time and effort you devote to attaining them and my father for the values to base them on.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Coleoptera of the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Maryland
    B A N I S T E R I A A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO THE NATURAL HISTORY OF VIRGINIA ISSN 1066-0712 Published by the Virginia Natural History Society The Virginia Natural History Society (VNHS) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the dissemination of scientific information on all aspects of natural history in the Commonwealth of Virginia, including botany, zoology, ecology, archaeology, anthropology, paleontology, geology, geography, and climatology. The society’s periodical Banisteria is a peer-reviewed, open access, online-only journal. Submitted manuscripts are published individually immediately after acceptance. A single volume is compiled at the end of each year and published online. The Editor will consider manuscripts on any aspect of natural history in Virginia or neighboring states if the information concerns a species native to Virginia or if the topic is directly related to regional natural history (as defined above). Biographies and historical accounts of relevance to natural history in Virginia also are suitable for publication in Banisteria. Membership dues and inquiries about back issues should be directed to the Co-Treasurers, and correspondence regarding Banisteria to the Editor. For additional information regarding the VNHS, including other membership categories, annual meetings, field events, pdf copies of papers from past issues of Banisteria, and instructions for prospective authors visit http://virginianaturalhistorysociety.com/ Editorial Staff: Banisteria Editor Todd Fredericksen, Ferrum College 215 Ferrum Mountain Road Ferrum, Virginia 24088 Associate Editors Philip Coulling, Nature Camp Incorporated Clyde Kessler, Virginia Tech Nancy Moncrief, Virginia Museum of Natural History Karen Powers, Radford University Stephen Powers, Roanoke College C. L. Staines, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Copy Editor Kal Ivanov, Virginia Museum of Natural History Copyright held by the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • University Morifilms International 300N.Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 8305402
    INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again-beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of North America
    Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Beetles of Eoa Genus Species
    BEETLES OF EOA GENUS SPECIES Acamaeodera tubulus Acanthoscealis obsoletus Acanthoscelides sp. Agonum sp. Agrilus egenus Agrilus politus Alobates pennsylvanica Amara sp. Ampedus nigricans Analeptura lineola Anisostena nigrita Anomoea laticlavia Anthaxia inornata Anthicus sp. Anthocomus ulkei ? Anthonomus suturalis Aphodius stercorosus Apion decoloratum Apion patruele Apion rostrum Arrhenodes minutus Babia quadriguttata Baliosus nervosus Bembidion fugax Berosus ordinatus Bidessonotus inconspicuus Blapstinus moestus Blepherida rhois Brachiacantha felina Brachiacantha quadripunctata Brachypnoea puncticollis Brachys ovatus Bradycellus neglectus Calligrapha bidenticola Calopteron terminale Calosoma scrutator Cantharis bilineatus Cantharis dentiger Cantharis fraxini Cantharis impressus Cantharis rectus Cantharis scitulus Canthon Hudsonias Capraita sexmaculata Capraita subvittata Cassida rubiginosa Cerotoma trifurcata Cercyon praetextatus Ceutorhynchus sp. Chaetocnema irregularis Chaetocnema pulicaria Chaetocnema sp. Charidotella sexpunctata bicolor Charidotella sexpunctata Chauliognathus marginatus Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus Chelymorpha cassidea Chlaenius aestivuus Chrysobotheris harrisi Chrysochus auratus Chrysomela interrupta Chrysomela scripta Cicindela repanda Cicindela punctulata Cicindela duodecimguttata Cicindela splendida Cicindela sexguttata Coccinella septempunctata Coleomegilla maculata lengi Colliuris pennsylvanicus Coloemegilla maculata Copris tullius Crepidodera longula Crepidodera nana Crepidodera violacea Cryptocephalus binominus
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report on the Leaf Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Cove Point LNG Property and Vicinity, Calvert County, Maryland
    Survey Report on the Leaf Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Cove Point LNG Property and Vicinity, Calvert County, Maryland Prepared by Joseph F. Cavey June 2004 Survey Report on the Leaf Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Cove Point LNG Property and Vicinity, Calvert County, Maryland Joseph F. Cavey 6207 Guthrie Court Eldersburg, Maryland 21784 Submitted June 2004 Abstract A survey was funded by the Cove Point Natural Heritage Trust to document the leaf beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of the Cove Point Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Limited Partnership Site in Calvert County, Maryland. The survey was conducted during periods of seasonal beetle activity from March 2002 to October 2003. The survey detected 92 leaf beetle species, including two species not formerly recorded for the State of Maryland and 55 additional species new to Calvert County. The detection of the rare flea beetle, Glyptina maritima Fall, represents only the third recorded collection of this species and the only recorded collection in the past 32 years. Dichanthelium (Panicum) dichromatum (L.) Gould is reported as the larval host plant of the leaf-mining hispine beetle Glyphuroplata pluto (Newman), representing the first such association for this beetle. Introduction This manuscript summarizes work completed in a two year survey effort begun in March 2002 to document the leaf beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of the Cove Point Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Limited Partnership Site in Calvert County, Maryland, USA. Fieldwork for this study was conducted under contract with the Cove Point Natural Heritage Trust, dated February 28, 2002. One of the largest insect families, the Chrysomelidae, or leaf beetles, contains more than 37,000 species worldwide, including some 1,700 North American species (Jolivet 1988, Riley et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Megalopodidae and Chrysomelidae 321 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.179.2625 Research Article Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysNew 179: 321–348Coleoptera (2012) records from New Brunswick, Canada: Megalopodidae and Chrysomelidae 321 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.179.2625 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research New Coleoptera records from New Brunswick, Canada: Megalopodidae and Chrysomelidae Reginald P. Webster1, Laurent LeSage2, Ian DeMerchant1 1 Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent St., P.O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB, Canada E3B 5P7 2 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nema- todes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada Corresponding author: Reginald P. Webster ([email protected]) Academic editor: R. Anderson | Received 6 January 2012 | Accepted 16 March 2012 | Published 4 April 2012 Citation: Webster RP, LeSage L, DeMerchant I (2012) New Coleoptera records from New Brunswick, Canada: Megalopodidae and Chrysomelidae. In: Anderson R, Klimaszewski J (Eds) Biodiversity and Ecology of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada. ZooKeys 179: 321–348. Abstract Zeugophora varians Crotch and the family Megalopodidae are newly recorded for New Brunswick, Cana- da. Twenty-eight species of Chrysomelidae are newly recorded for New Brunswick, including Acalymma gouldi Barber, Altica knabii Blatchley, Altica rosae Woods, Altica woodsi Isely, Bassareus mammifer (New- man), Chrysolina marginata (Linnaeus), Chrysomela laurentia Brown, Crepidodera violacea Melsheimer, Cryptocephalus venustus Fabricius, Neohaemonia melsheimeri (Lacordaire), N. nigricornis (Kirby), Pachybra- chis bivittatus (Say), Pachybrachis m-nigrum (Melsheimer), Phyllobrotica limbata (Fabricius), Psylliodes af- finis (Paykull), Odontota dorsalis (Thunberg),Ophraella communa (LeSage), Ophraella cribrata (LeConte), Ophraella notata (Fabricius), Systena hudsonias (Forster), Tricholochmaea ribicola (Brown), and Tricholoch- maea rufosanguinea (Say), which are also newly recorded for the Maritime provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Revision of the Australo-Papuan Genus
    Zootaxa 2486: 1–60 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) ZOOTAXA 2486 Revision of the Australo-Papuan genus Macrolema Baly (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Spilopyrinae), with description of a new genus C. A. M. REID & M. BEATSON Department of Entomology, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia. Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by G. Morse: 16 Apr. 2010; published: 27 May 2010 C. A. M. REID & M. BEATSON Revision of the Australo-Papuan genus Macrolema Baly (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Spilopyrinae), with description of a new genus (Zootaxa 2486) 60 pp.; 30 cm. 27 May 2010 ISBN 978-1-86977-543-8 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-544-5 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2010 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2010 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 2486 © 2010 Magnolia Press REID & BEATSON Table of contents Introduction . 3 Methods. 4 Allsortsia gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Bagworm Bags As Portable Armour Against Invertebrate Predators
    Bagworm bags as portable armour against invertebrate predators Shinji Sugiura Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan ABSTRACT Some animals have evolved the use of environmental materials as ``portable armour'' against natural enemies. Portable bags that bagworm larvae (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) construct using their own silk and plant parts are generally believed to play an important role as a physical barrier against natural enemies. However, no experimental studies have tested the importance of bags as portable armour against predators. To clarify the defensive function, I studied the bagworm Eumeta minuscula and a potential predator Calosoma maximoviczi (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Under laboratory conditions, all bagworm larvae were attacked by carabid adults, but successfully defended themselves against the predators' mandibles using their own bags. The portable bags, which are composed mainly of host plant twigs, may function as a physical barrier against predator mandibles. To test this hypothesis, I removed the twig bags and replaced some with herb leaf bags; all bag-removed larvae were easily caught and predated by carabids, while all bag-replaced larvae could successfully defend themselves against carabid attacks. Therefore, various types of portable bags can protect bagworm larvae from carabid attacks. This is the first study to test the defensive function of bagworm portable bags against invertebrate predators. Subjects Animal Behavior, Ecology, Entomology, Evolutionary Studies, Zoology Keywords Carabidae, Physical defense, Portable cases, Predation, Psychidae Submitted 18 August 2015 INTRODUCTION Accepted 22 January 2016 Animals have evolved defensive armour to protect themselves from predators; for example, Published 15 February 2016 armadillos and crabs have hardened their exoskeletons, hedgehogs and sticklebacks Corresponding author Shinji Sugiura, sug- have developed spines, and snails have developed shells as defensive armour (Edmunds, [email protected] 1974; Eisner, 2003; Emlen, 2014).
    [Show full text]