DOCSLIB.ORG

Piotr Gawrys - Michal Klukowski Negative Thru Conv

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Piotr Gawrys - Michal Klukowski Negative Thru Conv SPECIAL DOUBLES NOTRUMP OVERCALLS After Overcall: Penalty Direct: 15+ to 18 Systems on NAMES Piotr Gawrys - Michal Klukowski Negative thru Conv. GENERAL APPROACH Balancing: 11 to 17* Responsive : thru Maximal Polish Club Jump to 2NT: Minors 2 Lowest Support: Dbl. thru 2♥ Redbl Two Over One: Game Forcing Game Forcing ExceptWhen Suit Rebid Conv. Card-showing Min. Offshape T/O VERY LIGHT: Openings 3rd Hand Overcalls Preempts DEFENSE VS NOTRUMP FORCING OPENING: 1♣ 2♣ Natural 2 Bids Other vs: weak strong SIMPLE OVERCALL NOTRUMP OPENING BIDS 2♣ ♥+♠ ♣ + M 1NT 2NT 19+ to 21 1 level 6 to 17 HCP (usually) 2♦ one M ♦ + M 14+ to 17 3♣ 0-1♣ Puppet Stayman often 4 cards very light style 2 ♥ Transfer Responses: ♥ + m nat to 3♦ 0-1♦ Responses 2♠ ♠ + m nat Jacoby Texas 5-card Major common 3♥ 0-1♥ New Suit: Forcing NFConst NF 3 Dbl: points one m/both M 3♠ 0-1♠ ♠ minors, 5+4+ Jump Raise: Forcing Inv. Weak Other System on over 2♣ Stayman Puppet 2♦ Transfer to ♥ 4♦, 4♥ Transfer 3NT to solid suit, might be M JUMP OVERCALL OVER OPP'S T/O DOUBLE Forcing Stayman Smolen Strong Intermediate Weak New Suit Forcing:1 level 2 level 2♥ Transfer to ♠ Lebensohl ( denies) Conventional NT Openings Jump Shift:Forcing Inv. Weak 2♠ ♣/range ask Neg. Double : Redouble implies no fit 2NT ♦/both m weak Other: OPENING PREEMPTS 2NT Over Limit+ Limit Weak Sound Light Very Light MAJOR OPENING MINOR OPENING Majors NF 3/4-bids Minors Expected Min. Length 4 5 Expected Min. Length 4 3 0–2 Conv. Conv./Resp. sound V, very light NV Other 1st/2nd 1♣ 3rd/4th 1♦ DIRECT CUEBID VS Opening Preempts Double Is RESPONSES RESPONSES OVER: Minor Major Takeout thru 4♥ Penalty Natural Double Raise: Force Inv. Weak Double Raise: Force Inv. Weak Conv. Takeout: Strong T/O After Overcall: Force Inv. Weak After Overcall: Force Inv. Weak Lebensohl 2NT Response Michaels Conv. Raise: 2NT 3NT Splinter Forcing Raise: J/S in other minor 1♣ - 2♣ nat, 1♦ - 2♦ Majors Other: Other: Single raise Other: SLAM CONVENTIONS Gerber : 4NT: Blackwood RKC 1430 1NT: Forcing Semi-forcing NF Frequently bypass 4+♦ 2NT: Forcing Inv. to 1NT/1♣ 7 to 11 3NT: to 2NT Forcing Inv. 11 to 12 vs Interference: DOPI DEPO Level: ROPI Drury : Reverse 2-Way Fit 3NT: 12+ to 16 LEADS (circle card led, if not in bold) DEFENSIVE CARDING Other: Other versus Suits versus Notrump vs SUITS vs NT Standard: DESCRIBE RESPONSES/REBIDS x x x x x x x x x x x x Except 10+ to 15- HCP x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 2♣ Strong Other 6+♣ or 5+♣ 4(+)M2♦ waiting, 2M nat NF A K x T 9 x A K J x A Q J x 2♦ Resp: Neg Waiting 2NT conventional, 3x inv Q x K T x A T 9 A 9 x K J J T Upside-Down: 3 to 11 HCP 6♥ or 6♠ 2M p/c, 2NT R Q J x K T 9 x K Q J x K Q T 9 2♦ count Natural: Weak Intermediate Strong Conv. 2NT Force New Suit NF J T 9 Q T 9 x Q J T x Q T 9 x attitude 3 to 11 HCP 5+♥, 5(4)+m 2♠ NF, 2NT R, 3♣ p/c K Q T 9 J T 9 x T 9 x x 2♥ FIRST DISCARD Natural: Weak Intermediate Strong Conv. 2NT Force New Suit NF LENGTH LEADS: Lavinthal 3 to 11 HCP 5+♠, 5(4)+m 2NT R, 3♣ p/c, 3♦ = inv ♠ 4th Best vs SUITS vs NT Odd/Even 2♠ Natural: Weak Intermediate Strong Conv. 2NT Force New Suit NF 3rd/5th Best vs SUITS vs NT Attitude vs NT OTHER CARDING OTHER CONV. CALLS: New Minor Forcing: 2-Way NMF Smith Echorev Weak Jump Shifts: In Comp. Not in Comp. Primary signal to partner's leads Trump Suit Pref. 4th Suit Forcing: 1 Rd. Game Attitude Count Suit preference Foster Echo 1♣ = a) 11-14BAL b) 15+ NAT c) 18+ any SPECIAL CARDING PLEASE ASK Last modified: Feb 26 2021 10:43.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fortnight Nears the End
    World Bridge Series Championship Philadelphia Pennsylvania, USA 1st to 16th October D B 2010 aily ulletin O FFICIAL S PONSOR Co-ordinator: Jean-Paul Meyer • Chief Editor: Brent Manley • Editors: Mark Horton, Brian Senior, Phillip Alder, Barry Rigal, Jan Van Cleef • Lay Out Editor: Akis Kanaris • Photographer: Ron Tacchi Issue No. 14 Friday, 15 October 2010 FORTNIGHT NEARS THE END These are the hard-working staff members who produce all the deals — literally thousands — for the championships Players at the World Bridge Series Championships have been In the World Junior Championship, Israel and France will start at it for nearly two weeks with only one full day left. Those play today for the Ortiz-Patino Trophy, and in the World Young- who have played every day deserve credit for their stamina. sters Championship, it will be England versus Poland for the Consider the players who started on opening day of the Damiani Cup. Generali Open Pairs on Saturday nearly a week ago. If they made it to the final, which started yesterday, they will end up playing 15 sessions. Contents With three sessions to go, the Open leaders, drop-ins from the Rosenblum, are Fulvio Fantoni and Claudio Nunes. In the World Bridge Series Results . .3-5 Women’s Pairs, another pair of drop-ins, Carla Arnolds and For Those Who Like Action . .6 Bep Vriend are in front. The IMP Pairs leaders are Joao-Paulo Campos and Miguel Vil- Sting in the Tail . .10 las-Boas. ACBL President Rich DeMartino and Patrick McDe- Interview with José Damiani . .18 vitt are in the lead in the Hiron Trophy Senior Pairs.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a “Short Club” and Why Should You Avoid It? Curt Soloff
    What is a “short club” and why should you avoid it? Curt Soloff Bridge has a lexicon of its own, and at times the semantics become rather confusing. Fortunately, we can turn to ACBL and its convention card/alert chart standards for official definitions of terms that players often misunderstand. For this article, I have selected the “short club” as the topic of exploration. I am piggybacking this column on the recent Bridge Bulletin article by Larry Cohen (February 2017 issue, p. 32). In the Standard American and 2/1 Game Forcing systems that predominate U.S. clubs and tournaments, it is common to open 1♣ with as few as three clubs. Doing so is a necessity of the five card major system and is seldom problematic, since our emphasis ultimately lies in trying to play in a major suit or no-trump. That said, we still need some structure associated with our minor suits for the times we do want to play our contracts there, be they partscores, games, or slams. Cohen’s article, which focus on the 1♦ opening, reviews the standard practice of opening 1♦ when we are 4-4 in the minors but 1♣ when we are 3-3 in the minors. Many players have asked me over the years why we bid this way, and Cohen answers the question well: following this standard means that our 1♦ opening nearly promises (close to 97% of the time) a four card suit. When a major fit cannot be found, the responder can comfortably take a preference to diamonds with just four card support because it is safe to assume an eight card (or better) fit.
    [Show full text]
  • 13958-17879.Pdf
    DEFENSIVE AND COMPETITIVE BIDDING LEADS AND SIGNALS W B F CONVENTION CARD OVERCALLS (Style: Responses: 1 / 2 Level; Reopening) OPENING LEADS STYLE 1st level: Aggressive, Natural overcalls, (5) 8-15 HCP, (4) 5+ cards, Lead In Partner’s Suit CATEGORY: RED – Polish Club 2nd level: 12-16, constructive Suit 3rd/5th same NCBO: LATVIA Responses: new suit 2nd level NF, opp suit F1, NT 3rd/5th same PLAYERS: Janis Bethers – Martins Lorencs After 1M overcall - transfer bids, fit bids, SPL Subseq same same Other: 2nd/4th thru declarer 2nd/4th vs NT in own bid suit 1NT OVERCALL (2nd/4th Live; Responses; Reopening) LEADS SYSTEM SUMMARY 2nd seat 15-18 bal, 4th seat 11-14; 9-11 after pas Lead Vs. Suit Vs. NT Responses: System on after [1m] - 1NT - [pass] Ace Ax AKx GENERAL APPROACH AND STYLE [1M]-1NT-pas- transfers, transfer to opponent suit= 4OM, inv+, King AKx, KQx KQ10+ 1♣ = 12-14 bal or 16+ with suit or 18+bal 2♠=♣ or invitational, 2NT=both minors Queen QJx KQx 1♦ = 4+♦, unbalanced; 1M = (8) 11-15 HCP, 5+ Jack J10x, Jx J10x 2♣= 11-15 HCP 6+♣ or 5+♣ & 4M JUMP OVERCALLS (Style; Responses; Unusual NT) 10 HH10x, 109x, 10x HH10x 2♦ nonvul = 3-8 HCP 4+/4+ ♥/♠; 2♦ vul = 8-10 HCP 5+♥/4+♠ 1-Suit: WEAK 9 H109x, HH9x, 9x H109x, HH9x, 9x 2♥/♠ = (4) 6-10 HCP, (5) 6 M 2-Suit: GHESTEM ; 4th level leaping Michaels Hi-X Sx Sx, (Sxx) 2NT= 20-21 bal, 5M possible Lo-X HxS, HxSx, xxSx, xxxxS HxS, xxS, xxxxS 1NT Openings: 15-17, bal Reopen: Medium hand, playing tricks based SIGNALS IN ORDER OF PRIORITY 2 OVER 1 Responses:F1 DIRECT & JUMP CUE BIDS (Style; Response; Reopen) Partner’s Lead Declarer’s Lead Discarding SPECIAL BIDS THAT MAY REQUIRE DEFENSE Ghestem cue=2-suiter highest+lowest, 2NT= lowest, 1 Att C/T S/P 3♣=highest (against M); Suit 2 C/T S/P C/T 2♦ nonvul = 3-8 HCP 4+/4+ ♥/♠; 2♦ vul = 8-10 HCP 5+♥/4+♠ [1♣art]-2♦=both majors, System on; 3 S/P 3NT = SOLID MAJOR (AKQxxxx+, no side A or K) 3rdlevel cue=solid suit, asking stopper 1 ATT C/T S/P VS.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolish Club Contents
    Bolish Club A system that has evolved from EHAA+ (my version of EHAA, Every Hand An Adventure), and is now more similar to Polish Club. Other sources of inspiration are Keri by Ron Klinger, Ambra by Benito Garozzo, and Einari Club (a local Blue-team-like system, something of a standard in Turku). BC includes natural or strong 1|, 5-card majors, 2-over-1 game forcing, and responders 2| as relay in most situations. By Jari BÄoling,some based on ideas and discussions with Kurt-Erik HÄaggblom,Jyrki Lahtonen, and Ensio Lehtinen, last updated January 5, 2007 Contents 1 The 1| opening 2 1.1 Interference over 1| ......................................... 8 2 The 1} opening 10 3 Major openings 10 3.1 Choosing response in borderline cases . 12 3.2 The semi-forcing 1NT response . 12 3.3 The 1M-2| relay . 14 3.3.1 After interference . 15 3.3.2 A natural alternative . 15 4 The weak twos 16 4.1 New suit bids ask for stoppers and length . 16 4.2 Jump shifts are control asking bids . 17 4.3 2NT is an invitational or better raise . 17 4.4 The weak 2| opening . 18 4.5 Competition . 18 4.5.1 The McCabe convention . 19 5 The 2| opening as 17{18 balanced 19 6 2} Wilkosz 20 7 2| Multi-Wilkosz 20 8 Semi-balanced 2M 21 9 2} multi 22 10 The 2NT opening 22 BC Opening Bids Opening strength description conventional response frequency 1| a) 11{17 2+ clubs 2|, 2}, 2NT, 3} 8.5(9.7)% b) 18+ any shape (excluding 23-24 bal.) 1}=0{5 hcpts 3.2% 1} 11{17 4+ diamonds 2|, 2}, 2NT, 3| 8.6(9.5)% 1~ 11{17¤ 5+ hearts 2|, 2}, 2NT 6.7% 1Ä 11{17¤ 5+ spades 2|, 2~, 2NT 6.9% 1NT a)
    [Show full text]
  • Defensive Bidding Over Multi-Way Club and Strong Club Openings
    Defensive bidding over multi-way club and strong club openings General Approach There are a variety of systems including short club, Polish Club, and Carrot Club, Blue Club, Precision Club, Meckwell that basically use a one club opening bid to be a combination of a natural suit, a weak no trump, or any strong hand. The first group I call multi-way club systems, where the opening one club bid can have a hand like a weak no trump. They may also contain any strong hand, but this option is far less likely than a weak no trump. Sometimes they are forcing (Polish Club), sometimes not (short club). The second group is the strong club systems, where the opening one club bid is always strong and shows any hand that has 16+ points. The opening bid is completely artificial. Defensive bidding over multi-way club systems I propose a simple defence to these systems - treat them like a natural 1♣ opener. If you overcall, the advancer can bid clubs as a cue bid. Do not be afraid to make an offshape takeout double when you have at least 4-3 in the major suits and values for a ‘normal’ takeout double. The only changes I would make is to permit a 2♣ overcall to be natural and a 3♣ overcall to be a weak jump overcall. Of course, if 2♣ is natural then you lose your Michaels Cue Bid, so I recommend that you use 2♦ as the Michaels Cue Bid over both minor suit openings. Personally I ​ ​ do this over all 1♣ openings, even when they play Acol.
    [Show full text]
  • LYON, FRANCE • 12Th-26Th AUGUST 2017 “Bridge for Peace”
    43rd WORLD BRIDGE TEAM CHAMPIONSHIPS LYON, FRANCE • 12th-26th AUGUST 2017 “Bridge for Peace” rd 43 BERMUDA BOWL Coordinator: Jean-Paul Meyer • Editor: Mark Horton 21st VENICE CUP 11th WORLD DAILY Co-Editors: Barry Rigal, Brian Senior 9th D’ORSI SENIOR TROPHY TRANSNATIONAL OPEN TEAMS Journalists: David Bird, John Carruthers, Jos Jacobs BULLETIN Lay-Out Editor: Monika Kümmel • Photos: Ron Tacchi Issue No. 15 Saturday evening, 26th August 2017 USA II ARE THE LIONS OF LYON Contents Brackets and Rosters . .2 Cumulative Medal Table . .3 WBF President Farewell . .4 Roll Of Honour . .6 The Unluckiest Man in Lyon? . .14 IOC and GAISF Officials visit Lyon 2017 . .15 USA 2, winners of the Bermuda Bowl, with officials: Gianarrigo Rona, Martin Fleisher, Chip Martel, Jan Martel (NPC), Michael Rosenberg, Brad Moss, Jacek Pszczola, Patrick Grenthe, On ne change pas Joe Grue, José Damiani une équipe qui gagne . .15 Le (bon) coin francophone . .16 RR13: OT Poland v USA1 . .19 F S4: OT USA 2 v Italy . .22 F S5: BB France v USA2 . .25 F S6: BB France v USA2 . .28 Championship Diary . .31 Swings and Arrows . .32 The Magnificent Seven . .34 F S8: BB France v USA2 . .35 Winners of the Funbridge Transnational Teams: Team MAZURKIEWICZ Krzysztof Jassem, Piotr Gawryś, Michał Klukowski, Marcin Mazurkiewicz (pc) After a wonderful match that contained many thrilling deals it was USA II who emerged as the new Bermuda Bowl Champions, beating France by just 2 IMPs. Bulgaria defeated New Zealand in the play-off for the bronze medals. There was also a close finish to the Funbridge World Transnational Open Teams which saw Mazurkiewicz hold off a strong challenge by Jinshuo while Percy convincingly won the third place play-off with Zimmermann .
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 13.Qxd
    Co-ordinator: Jean Paul Meyer – Editor: Mark Horton – Assistant Editors: Brent Manley & Brian Senior French Editor: Guy Dupont – Layout Editor: Stelios Hatzidakis – Photographer: Ron Tacchi Issue No. 13 PDF version, courtesy of WBF Saturday, 3 November 2001 Germany Pip France in a Classic VUGRAPH MATCHES Bermuda Bowl – Final (Session 7) – 10.30 Norway v USA II Bermuda Bowl – Final (Session 8) – 13.20 to be decided Contents From left: Jörge Fritsche, Daniela von Arnim, Christoph Bermuda Bowl Final . 2 Kemmer, Pony Nehmert, Barbara Hackett,Andrea Rauscheid, Venice Cup Final . 2 Katrin Farwig & Sabine Auken. Transnational Teams Semi-finals & Final . 2 Transnational Tale . 3 Those who were privileged to be in the VuGraph yesterday Championship Diary . 3 witnessed one of the greatest days in the history of Bridge. Transnational Prize Winners - Special Categories . 3 Six Clubs Revisited . 4 In a final of epic proportions, the pride of Germany, Paul Fauconnier . 4 Sabine Auken, Daniela von Arnim, Andrea Rauscheid, The Other Lady In The Open . 4 Pony Nehmert, Katrin Farwig and Barbara Hackett de- Team Profile – German Ladies . 5 feated la belle France, represented by Catherine D'Ovidio, Bermuda Bowl (Norway v USA II) . 6 Véronique Bessis, Sylvie Willard, Bénédicte Cronier, French Slam . 9 Catherine Fishpool and Babette Hugon. Polish Team Profiles . 10 After the fourth session yesterday morning France ap- Appeal No. 3 . 12 A Bridge Mystery . 13 peared to be in disarray, having seen almost all their overnight Venice Cup (France v Germany) . 14 lead vanish in the face of a tremendous German rally. How- For No Reward . 17 ever, they redoubled their efforts and in the next stanza they A French world champion remembers .
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Standard 2000 ('WJ 2000')
    Polish Standard 2000 ('WJ 2000') by Krzysztof Jassem Ó 2000 Translated into English by Daniel J. Neill, June 2003. Distributed with the author's express permission. Publisher: Jarek Zalewski Semata Sp. z o.o. 53-659 Wroclaw ul. Sikorskiego 28/32 tel. (071) 373 55 80, 373 58 81 fax (071) 3735 55 79 Technical editor: Maciek Wreczycki Cover concept: Ula Gardy Reproduction and preparation for press: Semata Sp. z o.o. 53-659 Wroclaw ul. Sikorskiego 28/32 tel. (071) 373 55 80, 373 58 81 fax (071) 3735 55 79 Press: Drukarnia i Oficyna Wydawnicza FORUM 52-016 Wroclaw ul. Rybnicka 2 ISBN 83-914291-1-3 1 PDF byl vytvořen zkušební verzí FinePrint pdfFactory http://www.fineprint.cz Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 4 DEFINITIONS OF SEVERAL BRIDGE TERMS.................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 1 - "POLISH STANDARD 2000" BASICS............................................................................ 9 THE UNCONTESTED AUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 1§ Opening ............................................................................................................................................ 9 1¨ Opening .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Italy Triumph in Clash of the Titans
    Co-ordinator: Jean Paul Meyer Editor: Mark Horton Issue: 15 Ass. Editors: Brent Manley, Brian Senior Layout Editor: Stelios Hatzidakis Saturday 9, September 2000 Italy triumph in clash of the Titans In a match that will go down in history as one of the most exciting ever, it was Italy, represent- ed by Norberto Bocchi, Giorgio Duboin, Dano de Falco, Guido Ferraro, Lorenzo Lauria, Alfredo Versace, npc Carlo Mosca and coach Maria Teresa Lavazza who emerged as Champions in the Open series of the Olympiad. It was Italy's fourth win in all, and their first since1972.They now share with France the distinction of having won four times. It was only on the last few boards of the final session that they overcame the magnificent team from Poland, Cezary Balicki, Krzysztof Jassem, Michal Kwiecien, Jacek Pszczola, Piotr Tuszynski, Adam Zmudzinski, npc Jan Rogowski and coach Wojciech Siwiec. Transnational Mixed Teams In a final that was no less exciting, it was the combination from USA, Poland and Israel, WORLD TRANSNATIONAL team e-bridge, npc Pinhas Romik, Jill Meyers, MIXED TEAMS CHAMPIONSHIP Irina Levitina, Migry Tzur-Campanile, Sam Lev, John Mohan, Piotr Gawrys that captured the Final World title. They survived a tremendous fight Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Total back by Bessis, Michel Bessis,Véronique Bessis, e-bridge 40 6 20 66 Catherine D'Ovidio, Paul Chemla, who took the Bessis 1421255 silver medal for France. PDF version, courtesy of WBF The Daily Bulletin is produced on XEROX machines and on XEROX paper www.bridge.gr +31 (0) 73 6128611 11th WORLD TEAMS BRIDGE OLYMPIAD26 August - 9 September OPEN TEAMS RESULTS FINAL Home Team Visiting Team Board 1-16 Board 17-32 Board 33-48 Board 49-64 Board 65-80 Italy Poland 35 - 8 9 - 22 37 - 31 64 - 23 26 - 60 Home Team Visiting Team Board 81-96 Board 97-112 Board 113-128 Total Italy Poland 26 - 13 36 - 57 36 - 35 269 - 249 Farewell by Laurens Hoedemaker, President of the Dutch Bridge Federation Dear Bridge Friends, At the end of the Olympiad I wish to thank you all for your presence in Maastricht.
    [Show full text]
  • Karta Konwencyjna
    ARTIFICIAL MIN. CARDMIN. OPENING DESCRIPTION RESPONSE FURTHER BIDS AFTER A DOUBLE 11+ Polish club 1♦ = 0-6 any hand, 7-11 minors;2♣=FG 3+, 2♥=9- After 1♦ - 1♥/♠ = 3+; 1NT = 18-20PC, 2NT 21- 1♦ = 0-6 PC no 3 clubs 1♣ 11 ♣ + ♦, 2♠ trans. on NT invit+; 3minor = 6+ inv 23PC; after 1♥/♠ – 2♦ = relay* any hand, others - natural 11-21 HPC natural 2♥=5-9 5spades + 4 hearts, 2♠ artificial 7-9 with fit, 1♦-2♦-2♥/♠=stopper, good hand, 2NT=13+, 3♦ 3 in suit = preemptive 2♦=invitational+, 3♣=nat invit, 3♦=preemptive, from either hand is NF;1♦-2♥-2NT=relay> others – natural, on level 1♦ 4 3♥/♠=splinter 1♦-1♠-1NT-2♥= rel>2♠=3 fit, 2NT=stopper ♣ + 2 weak ♥, 3♣=stopper + no ♥ stop, 3♦=no club stop maybe heart stop, 3♠=max 3 fit 11-18 HPC natural 2NT= invite, 2♠=weak with 6 good spades, 3m=nat 1♥-1♠-2NT=FG, 1♥-1NT-2♠=FG>3♠=asking 1/2NT = good raise in 1♥ 5 invit 9-11 6+, 3hearts=preempt, 3NT=splinter ♦, for stopper, 1♥-1NT-2NT=FG 6+♥ oppening suit, 3 h = 4♦=good raise to 4♥ 8-10, preemp, others - natural 11-18 HPC natural 2NT= invit, 3minor or 3♥=nat invit 9-11 6+ without 1♠-2♥-3♥=4 card fit and extras, 4♣/♦=splinter As above 1♠ 5 fit, 3spades=preempt, 3NT=splinter ♥, 4♥=good without extras raise to do 4♠ 8-10 15-17 2♠=♣, 2NT=♦, 3♦=♦, 4♣/♦=Texas on h/s, 4♥/♠- 2♣-2♦-2♠=relay, 2♣-2♦-2♥-2♠=invit without Same as without dbl natural to play; 4spades, 2♣-2♥-2NT=invit with 4 spades, 2♣- 2♥/♠-3♣=relay, 2♣-2♥/♠-3♦=agrees trump, 2♣- 2♦-3♦=asking for 3-card major, 2♣--2NT=5 1 NT hearts, then 3♦=texas, 3♥=trump, 3♣=asks for doubleton>3♦=doubleton ♦, 3♥=doubleton ♣,
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Bidding - Standard American Yellow Card
    Bridge Bidding - Standard American Yellow Card Nicolae Sfetcu Published by Nicolae Sfetcu Second Edition Copyright 2014 Nicolae Sfetcu PREVIEW Contract Bridge Game type: trick-taking game Players: 4 Skills required: Memory, tactics, probability, communication Cards: 52 Deck: French Play: Clockwise Card rank: (highest to lowest) A K Q J 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Playing time: WBF tournament games = 7.5 minutes per deal Random chance: Low to moderate depending on variant played Related games: Whist, Auction bridge Contract bridge, usually known simply as bridge, is a trick-taking card game using a standard deck of 52 playing cards played by four players in two competing partnerships with partners sitting opposite each other around a small table. For purposes of scoring and reference, each player is identified by one of the points of the compass and thus North and South play against East and West. The game consists of several deals each progressing through four phases: dealing the cards, the auction (also referred to as bidding), playing the hand, and scoring the results. Dealing the cards and scoring the results are procedural activities while the auction and playing the hand are the two actively competitive phases of the game. Dealing: Partnerships are self-determined or by a cut of the cards, the two highest cut playing against the two lowest; the first dealer is the player cutting the highest card. Cards are dealt clockwise, one at a time and face down starting on the dealer's left so that each player receives thirteen cards. In duplicate bridge the dealer is predetermined by the board; the board also contains the four hands which have been dealt and placed in the board prior to commencement of the game.
    [Show full text]
  • Lajkonik of Tucson – a Piece of True Poland: Constructing Polish – American Identities in an Ethnically Heterogeneous Society
    LAJKONIK OF TUCSON – A PIECE OF TRUE POLAND: CONSTRUCTING POLISH – AMERICAN IDENTITIES IN AN ETHNICALLY HETEROGENEOUS SOCIETY __________________________________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board ___________________________________________________ in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ___________________________________________________ by Monika Glowacka-Musial January 2010 ii © by Monika Glowacka-Musial May 2010 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Lajkonik of Tucson – a piece of true Poland: Constructing Polish-American identities in an ethnically heterogeneous society Monika Glowacka-Musial Doctor of Philosophy Temple University, 2010 Dr. Paul Garrett Tucson, Arizona is a site of a lively Polish-American community. Initially associated with a political organization (“Solidarity Tucson”), which actively supported the Solidarity Movement throughout the 1980s, the Polish diaspora has gradually transformed into an ethnic community very much focused on maintaining its distinctive heritage. Recent formation of the Polish folkloric dance group Lajkonik was directly stimulated by the local multicultural establishment, which promotes ethnic diversity in the Old Pueblo. Having become an integral part of the Southwestern society, Lajkonik has developed a collection of identity practices, which despite diverse influences continues to reproduce Polish cultural traits. In my ethnographic account, I examine ways, by which members of the Lajkonik group construct their diasporic identities. First, I focus on the core activities of the group, which include the practice of Polish traditions, learning folk dances and songs in a wide cultural context, and negotiating the speaking of Polish. Additional analyses, based on video recordings, of Polish classes and dance rehearsals, which show the actual mechanics of the production processes, as well as the narratives of the teacher and parent of performers, further support the account of the ethnographer.
    [Show full text]