DOCSLIB.ORG

Rent £700 Pcm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rent £700 Pcm Rent £700 pcm The Boardroom, Tugby Orchards, Wood Lane, Tugby, Leicestershire, LE7 9WE Moores Commercial is delighted to be appointed to let the Ground Floor office space, formerly a shared boardroom for the offices, now surplus to requirements as the site now has an excellent café (café Ventoux, a cycle café). The office has the benefit of wifi shared cloakroom facilities with a in built kitchenette. Set in a peaceful location yet easily accessed off the A47 between Uppingham and Leicester in landscaped surroundings, these offices offer the best of the rural location with great accessibility. With ample car parking for office users and guests. The passing rent is £700 + vat per month with a service charge of £50 + vat per month. Location Tugby Orchards is located just of the A47 at Tugby Village between Uppingham and Leicester. Tugby and Keythorpe is a parish comprising the village of Tugby and land surrounding Keythorpe Grange, Keythorpe Hall, Hall Farm and Lodge Farm in Leicesters hire within the Harborough district. Situated 7 miles west of Uppingham, and 12 miles south of Leicester. According to the 2011 cens us the population of the parish was 330. Tugby Orchards is located on Wood Lane. Property Description Located on the ground floor of the business centre this office space offers approximately 560 square foot of space, with shared cloakroom facilities. The on site café has become popular with the office tenants and meant this former communal space can now become another office unit. Accommodation The "Orchard House" itself; was phase one of the Tugby Orchards development and completed in 2014 with 3600sq ft of air conditioned office space over two floors with stunning views across its own land. Each of the ten individual offices th at can be formed out of the two floors has its own security and access codes. Amenities Being strategicly located just 2 minutes off the A47, makes Tugby Orchards the ideal place for away from it all Conferences, Training days and Regional meetings. We have everything you could need in a beautiful location with easy access from the A1 (30 minutes) - Leicester (10 minutes) - Market Harborough (15 minutes) and Uppingham only 7 Minutes. The on site cafe (Cafe Ventoux) recently voted the uk's best cycle cafe, with Yoga centre, a pilates studio and a Watt bike Studio. Services Each office is fully air conditioned an heated, electric is separately metered and charged back to the tenant. Service Charge Service charge of £50 plus vat is payable per month (£600 per annum + vat) and charged quarterly with the rent. Terms Offered for let with a minimum 5 year terms with internal repair obligations only. Rent payable quartely in advance with the service charge. Rental at £700 per month plus vat (£8400 per annum net). Rates We believe this office space will benefit from rural rate relief but would advise interested parties to seek their own advice . Other business owners/tenants within Tugby Orchards do get this benefit at present. VAT VAT will be charged on the rent and the service charge at 20%. Legal Costs Each party to pay their own legal costs Viewing Viewing is strictly by prior appointment via the sole agents Moores Commercial Tel: 01664 431330 or via email [email protected] Parking The site offeres unlimited parking for office occupiers and guests to the business centre. Other Although this is the only available space available to let at the present time, office occupiers are often moving around to b igger space, if you are looking for a specific amount of space for you business please get in touch. Contact Details 36 High Street Oakham Rutland LE15 6AL www.moorescommercial.com %epcGraph_c_2_210% Email: [email protected] Tel: 01664 431330 Importan t; we would like to inform p rospective purchas ers that th ese sales particulars have been prepared as a gen eral guid e only. A detailed survey has not b een c arried out, no r the services, applianc es and fittings tested . Room sizes should not be relied upon for furnishing purpos es and are approximate. If floor plans are includ ed, th ey are for guid ance only and illustration pu rposes only and may not b e to scale. If there are any important matters likely to affect your d ecision to buy, please contact us b efore viewing th e prop erty. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download the 2016 Leicestershire Historian
    No 52 (2016) Published by the Leicestershire Archaeological and Historical Society LEICESTERSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SOCIETY Founded in 1855 Join the County's Premier Archaeological and Historical Society..... .....if you have an interest in archaeology, local history, churches, historic buildings, heraldry, history or any other topic concerned with Leicestershire's past. Individual Membership costs only £20 a year and this entitles you to: • Your own copy of ‘Transactions’, the Society’s major annual reference work for Leicestershire • Your own copy of the ‘Leicestershire Historian’ with the best essays and articles from local researchers, and a major review of recent local publications • Two Newsletters every year to keep you informed about all that’s happening locally • Free access to a fine collection of resources in the Society’s Library in the Guildhall • Attend a season of fascinating talks and lectures for free • Access to visits, history fairs, guided walks and special events Family Membership for two or more family members at one address costs £25, Student Membership costs £6 Full members receive all Society publications, student members receive the two Newsletters If you would like to join the Society, or require further details, please contact The Honorary Membership Secretary, Matthew Beamish, LAHS c/o ULAS, School of Archaeology & Ancient History, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester. LE1 7RH Tel. 0116 2525234 Email [email protected] www.le.ac.uk/lahs ‘Connecting history, heritage and archaeology groups across Leicestershire and Rutland’ Editor: Joyce Lee. All contributions should be sent to the Editor, The Guildhall, Guildhall Lane, Leicester. LE1 5FQ Email [email protected] Reviews Editor: Cynthia Brown, Leicestershire Archaeological and Historical Society, The Guildhall, Guildhall Lane, Leicester.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal (SA) / Strategic
    Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework: Site Allocations DPD (Preferred Options) Sustainability Appraisal (SA) / Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Sustainability Appraisal Report (Appendices) June 2006 Prepared for Leicestershire County Council by: Atkins Ltd Axis 6 th Floor West 10 Holliday St Birmingham B1 1TF Tel: Nicki Schiessel 0121 483 5986 Email: [email protected] This document is copyright and should not be copied in whole or in part by any means other than with the approval of Atkins Consultants Limited. Any unauthorised user of the document shall be responsible for all liabilities arising out of such use. Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework Site Allocations DPD Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices Contents Section Page Appendix A: List of Consultees and Interested Stakeholders 1 Appendix B: Summary of the Consultation Responses on the Scoping Report 15 Appendix C: Baseline Tables 23 Appendix D: Assessment of Proposed Sites 38 Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework Site Allocations DPD Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices APPENDIX A: LIST OF CONSULTEES AND INTERESTED STAKEHOLDERS 1 Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework Site Allocations DPD Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices SPECIFIC CONSULTATION BODIES GENERAL: East Midlands Regional Assembly Highways Agency, Melton Mowbray Programme Planning & Development, Birmingham Countryside Agency, East Midlands Region, East Midlands Development Agency Nottingham Nottingham Environment Agency, Leicestershire Partnership
    [Show full text]
  • Prestwold and Its Hamlets in Medieval Times
    PRESTWOLD AND ITS HAMLETS IN MEDIEVAL TIMES BY GEORGE F. FARNHAM, F.S.A. Prestwold and its Hamlets in Medieval Times By George F. Farnham, F.S.A. Prestwold is situated in the hundred of East Goscote in the county of Leicester, at the western extremity of the wolds, about 2£ miles east by north from l,oughborough. Ecclesiastically, the parish church of St. Andrew of Prestwold is the mother church of the chapelries of Hoton, Cotes and Burton on the wolds, Hoton being the only one of the three that has retained its chapel. The chapels of Cotes and Burton have long ceased to exist. At the time of the Domesday Survey, about 1086, there were at least four lords who held manorial rights in Prestwold and its hamlets, namely, Hugh, earl of Chester, Durand Malet, Geoffrey de Wirce and Robert de Jorz. Hugh, earl of Chester, held in Prestwold two carucates (about 200 acres) of land, a meadow 3 furlongs in length and 1 furlong in breadth, and woodland 6 furlongs in length and 5 furlongs in breadth, as parcel of his manor of Barrow on Soar. The earl also held one hide in Burton, of which the soc, i.e., the juris­ diction, belonged to Loughborough, of which manor the earl was chief lord. He also held in Burton, Godric being his under­ tenant, two carucates of land and 20 acres of meadow, of which Hugh de Grentemaisnil claimed the soc. A certain Hugh also held under the earl two carucates less 1 bovate (12 acres) in Burton which is said to be waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicestershire County Council
    2015 Leicestershire County Council Consultation Statement Consultation Statement 1.0 Consultation Statement 1.1 As the first stage in the production of the Minerals and Waste Local Plan, the County Council published the following documents in November 2013: Leicestershire Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Issues Document; Leicestershire Minerals and Waste Local Plan Review - Sustainability Appraisal incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment: Scoping Report. 1.2. The bodies with contact details listed in Appendix 1 were consulted by email or letter with a request for any comments to be provided by 24th January 2014. The documents, together with a summary leaflet and a response form, were made available on the County’s website (www.leics.gov.uk). The consultation exercise was also publicised by means of an advertisement placed in local newspapers. 1.3. A total of 70 groups and individuals responded to the Minerals and Waste Issues Consultation document. 28 of the responses were from councils (3 from District Councils; 12 from Parish Councils; 6 from adjoining Councils; and 7 from other councils), 12 from industry (7 from mineral companies and 5 from waste companies), 9 from statutory consultees, 2 from County Council Departments, 14 from other organisations, 2 from landowners and 3 from private individuals. A list of those who responded is set out in Table 1 below. 1 Consultation Statement Table 1: Respondents to the Issues consultation document Parish/Town Other Councils/ Industry Public Bodies Other Councils Meetings Blaby P.C. Charnwood Acorn Coal Authority British B.C. Recyclers Mountaineering Council Broughton Astley Hinckley & Air Products English Bowline P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2017, East Midlands
    East Midlands Register 2017 HERITAGE AT RISK 2017 / EAST MIDLANDS Contents Heritage at Risk III Northampton 61 South Northamptonshire 61 Wellingborough 65 The Register VII Nottingham, City of (UA) 66 Content and criteria VII Nottinghamshire 68 Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Ashfield 68 Reducing the risks XI Bassetlaw 69 Key statistics XIV Broxtowe 73 Gedling 74 Publications and guidance XV Mansfield 75 Key to the entries XVII Newark and Sherwood 75 Rushcliffe 78 Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Rutland (UA) 79 Derby, City of (UA) 1 Derbyshire 2 Amber Valley 2 Bolsover 4 Chesterfield 5 Derbyshire Dales 6 Erewash 7 High Peak 8 North East Derbyshire 9 Peak District (NP) 10 South Derbyshire 11 Leicester, City of (UA) 14 Leicestershire 17 Charnwood 17 Harborough 19 Hinckley and Bosworth 21 Melton 22 North West Leicestershire 23 Lincolnshire 24 Boston 24 East Lindsey 26 Lincoln 34 North Kesteven 36 South Holland 38 South Kesteven 40 West Lindsey 45 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 50 North Lincolnshire (UA) 52 Northamptonshire 55 Corby 55 Daventry 55 East Northamptonshire 58 Kettering 60 II East Midlands Summary 2017 notable theme for our work in tackling heritage at risk this year has been regeneration and the economic and social benefits it brings. We are excited A about the potential heritage has to improve our lives as demonstrated at Derby and now in Nottingham. And having taken North Lincolnshire and North East Lincolnshire back into the East Midlands last year, I have been delighted that we were able to assist in funding repairs to Victoria Mill, Grimsby.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Review
    CONSTITUTION COMMITTEE – 8 JANUARY 2016 REPORT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE ELECTORAL REVIEW OF LEICESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Purpose 1. This report sets out the draft recommendations of the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE ) in relation to new electoral arrangements for Leicestershire County Council, and seeks agreement to a County Council response to those recommendations. Background 2. The LGBCE is responsible for conducting electoral reviews. Electoral reviews are undertaken when electoral variances become notable. The LGBCE’s criteria for initiating a review are as follows:- (i) more than 30% of a council’s wards/divisions having an electoral imbalance of more than 10% from the average ratio for that authority; and/or (ii) one or more wards/divisions with an electoral imbalance of more than 30%; (iii) the imbalance is unlikely to be corrected by foreseeable changes to the electorate within a reasonable period. 3. The County Council and the LGBCE agreed that a review was required as one of the criteria for review had been met, namely that 30% of electoral divisions had an imbalance of more than 10%. The review process formally commenced in December 2014. Statutory Rules 4. The LGBCE has to work within the legislative guidelines and the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 (the 2009 Act). Schedule 2 to the 2009 Act sets out the statutory criteria to which the LGBCE are required to have regard in conducting electoral reviews which include: (i) the need to secure equality of representation; (ii) the need to reflect the identities and interests of local communities; and (iii) the need to secure effective and convenient local government.
    [Show full text]
  • Accompanying Note
    Rural Economy Planning Toolkit Companion Document Instructions for Using the Toolkit Useful Context Information Produced by: Funded by: Rural Economic Development Planning Toolkit This document explains how to use the toolkit in greater detail and sets out some of the broader context relevant to the development of the toolkit. Its sections are: Instructions for Using the Toolkit Economic Development Context The Emerging National Framework for Planning and Development The assessment of planning applications for rural economic development: designated sites and key issues for Leicestershire authorities What makes a good rural economic development planning proposal? Case Studies Parish Broadband Speeds The Distribution and Contribution of Rural Estates within Leicestershire Attractions in Leicester and Leicestershire Instructions - Using the Toolkit The toolkit is in the form of an interactive PDF document. Most of the text is locked, and you cannot change it. Throughout the toolkit, though, comments, information and responses are asked for, and boxes you can type in are provided. You are also asked to select 'traffic lights' – red, amber or green. It is important to understand that, if you start with a blank copy of the toolkit, the first thing you should do is save it with a different name using the 'Save as Copy' command in Acrobat Reader. This means you have now created a version of the toolkit for the particular project you are working on, and still have the blank copy of the toolkit for another time. Let's assume you have saved your copy of the PDF file as 'Project.pdf' – every time you save again you will save all of the additions and traffic light choices you have made.
    [Show full text]
  • Tugby & Keythorpe NP Design Guide
    February 2021 CONSULTATION DRAFT Tugby & Keythorpe Design Guide To sit within the emerging Neighbourhood Plan Design Guide Contents 1.0 Introduction 4 - 5 2.0 Contextual Assessment 6 - 9 3.0 Design Response 10 03 Tugby & Keythorpe, Leciestershire This document is intended to guide project development and material considerations (intended to sit within the emerging Neighbourhood Plan) when determining applications for future development by highlighting pertinent design concepts and features relevant to the Parish of 01Introduction Tugby and Keythorpe, Leicestershire. 1.1 PURPOSE 1.3 GOOD DESIGN 1.1.1 // The design of public buildings, residential 1.3.1 // Good design and the provision of efficient developments and their surroundings should contribute services are objectives of the Leicestershire Sustainable to and enhance the quality of the environment, Community Strategy. The provision of well designed rather than simply respond to funding or contractual buildings and places links and contributes to achieving a requirements. They should be a source of pride and variety of transportation, environmental, educational and inspiration, and should help to reinforce the sense of social outcomes. These objectives are also embedded place and character in the neighbourhoods within which in government advice, policy and legislation that govern they are located. Poor design can result in a legacy for built development and the conduct of local authorities. current and future generations and a loss of civic pride 1.3.2 // It is intended that this document is used by all in an area contributing towards the deterioration of the those involved in bringing forward Tugby and Keythorpe’s urban and social fabric of an area.
    [Show full text]
  • District HARBOROUGH
    Leicestershire County Council - Planned Road Works This edition of the bulletin as automatically generated on the 23 Sep 2 016 HARBOROUGH District For more information about roadw orks call our Customer Service Centre: 0116 3050001 Road Name/ Number & Description Contractor/Client Estimate Expecte Traffic Notes Loca tion d Start d End Management MAIN STREET Boundary box Install 25mm GLF G&T SEVERN TRENT WATER 22/09/2016 26/09/2016 Traffic Control (Give and Job in Footway (Asphalt (footways) ) East Scheduling team Take) ASHBY PARVA COPLOW LANE Surface Dressing Leicestershire County 10/05/2016 30/09/2016 Traffic Control (Stop/Go Council (LHO) Boards) BILLESDON LEICESTER ROAD Urgent works required in sewer line SEVERN TRENT WATER 23/09/2016 29/09/2016 Traffic Control (Two-Way due to flooding potential and customer COSC Waste 11:30:00 Signals) concern BILLESDON HUNTER BOULEVARD Install 100m of 1 way power duct in BRITISH TELECOM - Inc 22/09/2016 05/10/2016 No Carriageway Incursion Footway,Install 23m of 1 way power duct S81 in Carriageway,Performing an BITTESWELL 1excavation to expose existing power HUNTER BOULEVARD For laying of 140m of cable only in third Western Power, 6136 SE 29/09/2016 30/09/2016 No Carriageway Incursion party trench - No Excavation, WPD are Warwickshire not excavating or reinstating, All BITTESWELL excavations and reinstatements are the BLASTON ROAD Surface Dressing Leicestershire County 10/05/2016 30/09/2016 Road Closure Council (LHO) BLASTON HALLATON ROAD Surface Dressing Leicestershire County 10/05/2016 30/09/2016
    [Show full text]
  • HARBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL OPEN SPACES STRATEGY Prepared by TEP MARCH 2021
    HARBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL OPEN SPACES STRATEGY Prepared by TEP MARCH 2021 TEP The Reynard Suite Bowden Business Village Market Harborough LE16 7SA Tel: 01858 383120 Email: [email protected] Offices in Warrington, Market Harborough, Gateshead, London and Cornwall Final Report Harborough District Council Open Spaces Strategy Document Title Open Spaces Strategy Prepared for Harborough District Council Prepared by TEP - Market Harborough Document Ref 8202.008 Author Valerie Jennings Date April 2021 Checked Rebecca Martin Approved Lindsey Cunniff Amendment History Check / Modified Version Date Approved Reason(s) issue Status by by 1.0 03/07/20 VJ RM/AK Initial Issue of Chapters 1 to 4. Issued 2.0 12/02/21 VJ RM/LC Issue of full first draft Issued 3.0 12/03/21 VJ RM/LC Draft for scrutiny committee Issued Amendments following scrutiny committee. 4.0 29/04/21 VJ RM Issued Final report. Final Report Harborough District Council Open Spaces Strategy CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................13 3.0 Policy Context ......................................................................................................................15 4.0 Method ..................................................................................................................................24 5.0 Identifying Local Needs
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Statement
    2015 Leicestershire County Council Consultation Statement Consultation Statement 1.0 Consultation Statement 1.1 As the first stage in the production of the Minerals and Waste Local Plan, the County Council published the following documents in November 2013: Leicestershire Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Issues Document; Leicestershire Minerals and Waste Local Plan Review - Sustainability Appraisal incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment: Scoping Report. 1.2. The bodies with contact details listed in Appendix 1 were consulted by email or letter with a request for any comments to be provided by 24th January 2014. The documents, together with a summary leaflet and a response form, were made available on the County’s website (www.leics.gov.uk). The consultation exercise was also publicised by means of an advertisement placed in local newspapers. 1.3. A total of 70 groups and individuals responded to the Minerals and Waste Issues Consultation document. 28 of the responses were from councils (3 from District Councils; 12 from Parish Councils; 6 from adjoining Councils; and 7 from other councils), 12 from industry (7 from mineral companies and 5 from waste companies), 9 from statutory consultees, 2 from County Council Departments, 14 from other organisations, 2 from landowners and 3 from private individuals. A list of those who responded is set out in Table 1 below. 1 Consultation Statement Table 1: Respondents to the Issues consultation document Parish/Town Other Councils/ Industry Public Bodies Other Councils Meetings Blaby P.C. Charnwood Acorn Coal Authority British B.C. Recyclers Mountaineering Council Broughton Astley Hinckley & Air Products English Bowline P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 16/00802/FUL Location: Land Off Dingley Road, G
    Planning Committee Report Applicant: Langton Developments Ltd Application Ref: 16/00802/FUL Location: Land off Dingley Road, Great Bowden Proposal: Erection of 17 dwellings, including affordable bungalows with infrastructure, means of access and open space Application Validated: 17.05.2016 Target Date: 16.08.16 (Extension of Time Agreed) Case Officer: Susan Garbutt Recommendation The application should be REFUSED for the following reasons: 1) The proposed housing scheme and associated vehicular access will lead to less than substantial harm to the significance of Great Bowden Conservation Area and the established setting of the nearby listed buildings. The harm to the designated heritage assets identified are not outweighed by public benefits of the proposal. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies CS1, CS11 and CS17 of the Harborough District Core Strategy and Framework policy 12. 2) The proposed scheme will have an adverse impact upon the survival of the moated platform, an archaeological remain. Furthermore, it will have an adverse effect on the significance of the setting of the Victorian cemetery. The scale of harm to these non- designated heritage assets is of such a degree that is would have a significant and detrimental impact on their original setting. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies CS1, CS11 and CS17 of the Harborough District Core Strategy and Framework policy 12. 3) Plots 1 and 2, by virtue of their scale, design and positioning will not safeguard the amenities of existing and future residents of number 10 Dingley Road. Plots 3 and 4 and plot 9 by virtue to their southern orientation and close positioning to existing mature trees, which are proposed to be retained, would result in considerable future pressure for them to be removed.
    [Show full text]