DOCSLIB.ORG

Kaituna River Fish Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kaituna River Fish Inventory Kaituna River fish inventory NIWA Client Report: HAM2005-047 April 2005 NIWA Project: BOP04223 Kaituna River fish inventory Jacques Boubée Cindy Baker Prepared for Environment Bay of Plenty NIWA Client Report: HAM2005-047 April 2005 NIWA Project: BOP04223 National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd Gate 10, Silverdale Road, Hamilton P O Box 11115, Hamilton, New Zealand Phone +64-7-856 7026, Fax +64-7-856 0151 www.niwa.co.nz All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the client. Such permission is to be given only in accordance with the terms of the client's contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Inventory 1 2.1 Existing data 1 2.2 Field surveys 1 2.3 Fish found in the upper Kaituna River 2 2.4 Fish found in the lower Kaituna River 3 Reviewed & approved for release by: D.S. Roper Formatting checked 1. Introduction This report provides an inventory of fish from the Kaituna River and its tributaries. Information has been drawn from NIWA’s Freshwater Fish Database, unpublished reports, Department of Conservation records, Mighty River Power records and recent field surveys undertaken by NIWA. The Kaituna River has two distinct sections, each representing very different habitats for fish. The upper section has high flow velocities and runs for over 27 km from Okere Falls through a deep gorge. Access into the upper section is limited and dangerous. The lower section is broader and slower flowing and meanders through flat country until reaching the sea at Maketu. The fish populations in the two river sections are quite distinct and are presented separately in this report. 2. Inventory 2.1 Existing data Information on existing fish species in the Kaituna River was extracted from the New Zealand Freshwater Fish Database (NZFFD). The NZFFD is a national, site-specific database of fish species presence/absence, and is the preferred repository for fish survey data for the majority of people undertaking freshwater fish studies in New Zealand. Unpublished results of fish surveys undertaken by the Department of Conservation and Mighty River Power were also obtained for our assessment. The information collated indicates that relatively few fish distribution studies have been undertaken within the upper section of the river and only 22 records for this river section were held in the NZFFD on 31 August 2004. 2.2 Field surveys To supplement existing records additional sampling was undertaken in 2004 and the information entered into the NZFFD. Two sites were sampled in the upper river section and three in lower section. As well as sampling in the main stem of the river surveying was also carried out in an unnamed tributary downstream of Stottle Rapids and in the Mangorewa River. Kaituna River fish inventory 1 Difficulty in accessing the upper section of the river, and the high flows encountered at survey sites, limited sampling options. As a result, sampling could only be carried out using electric fishing, minnow trapping and fyke nets. In the lower river a wider range of nets and sampling techniques could be used including electric fishing, gill nets, various fyke nets, seine nets, minnow traps. 2.3 Fish found in the upper Kaituna River Based on the review of existing information and NIWA’s field surveys, a total of ten species of fish have been found in the upper section of the Kaituna River (Table 1). Longfin eels are the most abundant fish species, penetrating well inland. The scarcity of shortfin eels may reflect a lack of habitat rather than a lack of migratory ability. No banded kokopu are present in Lakes Rotoiti or Rotorua, but sparse populations of koaro are present in some Lake Rotoiti tributaries. Banded kokopu found in this river section must therefore have migrated from the sea, but koaro could be recruits from either the lakes or the sea. No indigenous fish were found in a survey of eight tributary streams located between the upstream limit of the gorge and Okere Falls (K. Young, Department of Conservation, Rotorua, pers. comm.). Kaituna River fish inventory 2 Table 1. List of indigenous and introduced fish species present in the upper Kaituna River catchment and % occurrence in all available records (N=24 records). * = Diadromous species, although landlocked populations of koaro, common bully and smelt are also present in the headwater lakes. Scientific name Common name Percent occurrence Indigenous species Anguilla australis* Shortfin eel 8.3 Anguilla dieffenbachii* Longfin eel 45.8 Cheimarrichthys fosteri* Torrentfish 4.1 Galaxias brevipinnis* Koaro 4.2 Galaxias fasciatus* Banded kokopu 4.2 Gobiomorphus cotidianus* Common bully 30.3 Retropinna retropinna* Common smelt 8.3 Introduced species Carassius auratus Goldfish 4.2 Oncorhynchus mykiss Rainbow trout 20.8 Salmo trutta Brown trout 4.2 2.4 Fish found in the lower Kaituna River The lower Kaituna River has a wider range of habitats and supports 19 fish species; 15 indigenous and four introduced (Table 2). This diversity is equivalent to that found in neighbouring Bay of Plenty rivers. All indigenous fish are diadromous, with seven of the 15 species only present in the lower section of the river. Common bully and smelt form significant diadromous populations in the lower river, with the upper river populations comprised mainly of downstream migrants from lacustrine stocks. Longfin and shortfin eels are the most frequently recorded fish species, found at 86 % of all sampled sites within the lower river. Field surveys did not locate any new fish species, but have expanded the distribution of inanga, which were found in the mainstem as far up as The Rapids. Kaituna River fish inventory 3 Table 3.17. List of indigenous and introduced fish species present in the lower Kaituna River catchment and % occurrence in all available records (N=80 records). * = diadromous species. Scientific name Common name Percent occurrence Indigenous species Anguilla australis* Shortfin eel 41.3 Anguilla dieffenbachii* Longfin eel 45.0 Arripis trutta Kahawai 1.3 Cheimarrichthys fosteri* Torrentfish 3.4 Galaxias argenteus* Giant kokopu 5.0 Galaxias brevipinnis* Koaro 3.4 Galaxias fasciatus* Banded kokopu 6.3 Galaxias maculatus* Inanga 23.8 Geotria australis* Lamprey 3.4 Gobiomorphus cotidianus* Common bully 26.3 Gobiomorphus gobioides* Giant bully 10.0 Gobiomorphus huttoni* Redfin bully 17.5 Rhombosolea retiaria* Black flounder 1.3 Retropinna retropinna* Common smelt 27.5 Mugilidae Mullet 6.3 Introduced species Carassius auratus Goldfish 2.5 Gambusia affinis Gambusia/mosquitofish 15.0 Oncorhynchus mykiss Rainbow trout 13.8 Salmo trutta Brown trout 3.8 Kaituna River fish inventory 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Resource Use a Matter of Perspective: a Case Study of The
    WATER RESOURCE USE A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE: A CASE STUDY OF THE KAITUNA RIVER CLAIM, WAITANGI TRIBUNAL a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN GEOGRAPHY in the university of canterbury . by. TIMOTHY W fRASER 1988 contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii LIST OF FIGURES, PLATES AND TABLES v LIST OF MAPS vi ABS1RACT vii CHAPTER PAGE one INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction .............................................. 1 1.2 A Case Study for Bicultural Research ............... .. 6 1.3 Thesis Structure ................................. .. 10 two THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL PROBLEM OF ROTORUA CITY: THE KAITUNA RIVER CLAIM 2.1 Introduction ........................................................ 14 2.2 The Problem ........................................................ 15 2.3 A General Response ........._...................................... 24 2.4. The Kaituna River Claim Waitangi Tribunal.................... 32 2.5 Options Pursued After the Waitangi Tribunal Hearing........ 38 2.6 Concluding Remarks .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. ... ... 40 three A DOMINANT CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE: THE ENGINEERING SOLUTION 3.1 Introduction ........................................................ 42 3.2 Roots of a Technological Perspective .......................... 43 3.3 Rise of the Engineer .............................................. 47 3.4 Developing a Water Resource Use Strategy ................... 52 ii 3.5 Water and Soil Legislation: 1941 and 1967 ................... 55 3.6 The Dominant Perspective Challenged ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Tauranga Moana / Te Arawa Ki Takutai Partnership Forum Meeting Held on 29/07/2020
    te tini a tuna KAITUNA ACTION PLAN 2019-2029 A plan of action prepared by Te Maru o Kaituna MOEMOEĀ – OUR VISION E ora ana te mauri o te Kaituna, e tiakina ana hoki m3 ng1 whakatupuranga 3 n1ianei, 3 muri nei hoki. The Kaituna River is in a healthy state and protected for current and future generations. MIHI Ko Kaituna te awa tupua Kaituna our guardian Ko Kaituna te mauri ora Kaituna our life force Ko Kaituna te awa tūpuna Kaituna our ancestral river Ko Kaituna te oranga whānui Kaituna our sustenance Ko Kaituna te awa honohono i te tangata Kaituna a connector of people Mai uta ki te tai From the lakes to the sea Tēnā koutou katoa, Na te Maru o te Kaituna i tukuna mai ai e mātou te mahere hohenga o tēnei ngahuru ki te mea ko porowhiua he tuna hei kaiārahi. On behalf of Te Maru o Kaituna we provide this ten year action plan titled Te Tini a Tuna as a working guide towards achieving our future vision for the Kaituna River. Ngā mihi, Dean Flavell, Chair of the Te Maru o Kaituna River Authority Approved 27 September 2019 CONTENTS About this plan 3 Action Plan purpose 3 Guiding principles 4 PART ONE Plan theme 4 Te Upoko o te Tuna Developing this plan 4 Overview Plan linkages 5 Geographic scope 5 Introducing our actions 8 Criteria for prioritising actions and projects 10 Action and project details 10 PART TWO Acronyms / Abbreviations 10 Te Puku o te Tuna Priority Action 1: Take collective responsibility for improving Our Actions the health and well-being of the Kaituna River and its tributaries 11 Priority Action 2: Create a network of healthy
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminants in Kai – Te Arawa Rohe Part 1: Data Report
    Contaminants in kai – Te Arawa rohe Part 1: Data Report NIWA Client Report: HAM2011-021 March 2011 NIWA Project: HRC08201 Contaminants in Kai – Te Arawa rohe Part 1: Data Report Ngaire Phillips Michael Stewart Greg Olsen Chris Hickey NIWA contact/Corresponding author Ngaire Phillips Prepared for Te Arawa Lakes Trust Health Research Council of New Zealand NIWA Client Report: HAM2011-021 March 2011 NIWA Project: HRC08201 National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd Gate 10, Silverdale Road, Hamilton P O Box 11115, Hamilton, New Zealand Phone +64-7-856 7026, Fax +64-7-856 0151 www.niwa.co.nz All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the client. Such permission is to be given only in accordance with the terms of the client's contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Contents Executive Summary iv 1. Introduction 1 2. Methods 4 2.1 Survey design 4 2.2 Kai consumption survey 4 2.3 Te Arawa consumption data 5 2.4 Sampling Design 5 2.4.1 Site and kai information 5 2.4.2 Contaminants of concern 8 2.4.3 Sampling sites and kai species 8 2.5 Analysis of contaminants in kai and sediment 11 2.6 Analysis of mercury in hair 12 3. Results and discussion 14 3.1 Sampling 14 3.2 Te Arawa consumption data 14 3.3 Mercury in hair 15 3.4 Te Arawa Contamination Data 17 3.4.1 Organochlorine Pesticides 17 3.4.2 Heavy Metals 19 3.4.3 Evidence for bioaccumulation 26 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology of the Te Tumu Cut Under the Potential Re-Diversion of the Kaituna River
    http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Morphology of the Te Tumu Cut Under the Potential Re-diversion of the Kaituna River A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth and Ocean Sciences at The University of Waikato By Joshua Carl Mawer ________ The University of Waikato 2012 i Abstract Following the diversion of the Kaituna River from Maketū Estuary, out to sea at Te Tumu in 1956, the local community has continually voiced concerns over the estuary’s increased sedimentation rates and decreasing ecological health. These concerns led to the partial re-opening of Fords Cut in 1996. However, this has only resulted in a slight improvement in water quality, and no measurable reduction in sedimentation. The Bay of Plenty Regional Council is currently investigating a number of different re-diversion options to partially or fully restore the flow of the Kaituna River into Maketū Estuary, with the aim of restoring the estuary’s health.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality and Ecology of the Kaituna/Maketū and Pongakawa
    Ōngātoro/Maketū Estuary Median chlorophyll-a concentration 2006-2011 At risk from: • Increasing nutrients and sediment Water quality and ecology of the • Nuisance plant and algae growth Kaituna/Maketū and Pongakawa/ • Loss of whitebait habitat Estuaries are dynamic environments with large changes in Waitahanui catchments tidal and river flows. About 63 percent of our native freshwater fish use estuaries to swim between fresh and salt water. Nutrients from the land wash into nearby streams and often end up in estuaries. Nutrients can promote excess plant and algae growth. We measure this growth by checking the concentration of chlorophyll-a, the pigment in plants that is used for photosynthesis. More chlorophyll-a generally means more abundance of weed and algae. The Ōngātoro/Maketū Estuary has a higher median chlorophyll-a concentration Chlorophyll-a concentration ranges for than any other Bay of Plenty river estuary. Bay of Plenty river estuaries 2006-2011 Chlorophyll-a 16 Median Cyanobacteria 14 25%-75% Cyanobacteria (also called blue-green algae) are a group 12 Min-Max of bacteria that have chlorophyll and behave like plants. 10 They occur naturally, but can ‘bloom’ under certain 3 8 conditions. Some species of cyanobacteria produce toxins mg/m 6 which may be harmful to humans and other animals. 4 Summary Cyanobacteria generated in Lakes Rotorua and Rotoiti 2 • Nitrate is increasing in the Kaituna River Trophic level index of Lakes Rotorua sometimes spread into the Kaituna River, usually during 0 andT Rotoitirophic L2010-2014evel Index • Water quality is usually good for swimming summer months. Productivity, as indicated by chlorophyll-a, -2 Tarawera Rangitāiki Whakatāne Ōngātoro/ Ōpōtiki Ōpōtiki at five of six monitored sites 6 Supertrophic in the estuaries has remained low in comparison.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Lake Degradation, Rotorua Lakes, New Zealand
    Water Pollution X 157 The tale of two lakes: managing lake degradation, Rotorua lakes, New Zealand P. Scholes1 & J. McIntosh2 1Environment Bay of Plenty, New Zealand 2Lochmoigh Limited, New Zealand Abstract Lakes Rotorua and Rotoiti, two co-joined lakes of the Rotorua Group, North Island, New Zealand, have had an increasing prevalence of cyanobacterial blooms due to lake eutrophication. Targets for water quality restoration are set in statutory planning objectives expressed quantitatively by trophic level indices. Quantification of external and internal nutrient loads underpins the restoration targets. Comprehensive stream and groundwater monitoring, together with a monthly lake monitoring programme, provide data for models that delineate nitrogen inputs from sub-catchments to lake ecological modelling. Lake Rotorua catchment is dominated by pastoral land use and receives significant nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) load from groundwater, as well as geothermal springs. Increasing groundwater nitrogen (predominantly as nitrate) and internal phosphorus loads need to be reduced to meet water quality objectives. Reduction of the external nutrient loads to Lake Rotorua has begun by addressing several sources. These include: the Rotorua City wastewater treatment plant upgrade; stream dosing with aluminium sulphate; areas with on-site wastewater treatment reticulated to the central wastewater treatment plant; and stormwater upgrades. Hydrological and limnological studies have found nutrient inputs to Lake Rotoiti to be dominated by the inflow from Lake Rotorua, which accounts for approximately 73% N and 76% P. A diversion wall has been installed to interrupt the underflow current from Lake Rotorua to Lake Rotoiti with Lake Rotorua waters deflected straight to the Lake Rotoiti outlet.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaituna River and Ōngātoro/ Maketu Estuary Strategy
    Kaituna River and Ōngātoro/ Maketu Estuary Strategy From Okere Falls to Ōngātoro/Maketu Estuary Acknowledgements This document has been put together by Environment Bay of Plenty, Western Bay of Plenty District Council, Tauranga City Council and Rotorua District Council – working with representatives from the Kaituna/Maketu community – including iwi, hapū, individuals, community groups and organisations. Special thanks go to: Members of the Working Party, Focus Groups, and tangata whenua for their enthusiasm, commitment and hard work, including: – Maketu Estuary Focus Group – Wetlands and Aquatic Habitat Focus Group – Urban and Industry Development Focus Group – Recreation Focus Group. The wide range of people who put time and energy into participating in public meetings and discussions, providing written feedback and attending the hearings – all of which improved the content of the Strategy. Thanks also to the current and past members of the Kaituna Maketu Joint Council Committee for their guidance and debate. Particular thanks go to Hearings Panel whose recommendations have been incorporated into the Kaituna Maketu Joint Council Committee Public Feedback Report and this Strategy. A summary of the responses to public feedback follows: ▪ Kaituna River to Ōngātoro/Maketu Estuary re-diversion – The Hearing Panel made recommendations based on public feedback and its site visit. The Hearing Panel recommended: – Environment Bay of Plenty commit to progressing the re-diversion of the Kaituna River to the Ōngātoro/Maketu Estuary. – That the preferred option is the full re-diversion of the river back to the estuary with the capability of flood relief through Te Tumu Cut. – In accordance with strong community support, that re-diversion should be advanced as soon as possible by working with mana whenua and landowners on a range of complex issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of Floodplain Habitats for Inanga (Galaxias Maculatus) in the Kaituna River, North Island, New Zealand
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Available online at www.science.canterbury.ac.nz/nznsprovided by UC Research Repository Restoration of floodplain habitats for inanga (Galaxias maculatus) in the Kaituna River, North Island, New Zealand Peter M. Ellery & Brendan J. Hicks* Centre for Biodiversity and Ecology Research, Department of Biological Sci- ences, School of Science and Engineering, The University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. *Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] (Received 31 July 2008, revised and accepted 23 March 2009) Abstract The Kaituna River on New Zealand’s east coast is about 50 km long and drains lakes Rotorua and Rotoiti. An extensive flood control scheme, including stop-banks and gates, prevents flow of water from the lower river main channel to the original floodplain. In addition, a new, shortened channel (the Kaituna Cut) diverts the river directly to the sea instead of flowing through its original course into the Maketu Estuary. Minnow-trapping of inanga, common smelt, and bullies in 50 year-old ponds, recently constructed ponds, and riverine sites showed that new ponds were colonised by inanga within three months of construction. New ponds had higher catch rates than old ponds, and both new and old ponds had higher catch rates than the river, where no inanga were caught. Extrapolations from trap catch rates (2-13 inanga per 100 m2), suggest that old ponds held about 8-20 inanga per 100 m2, while in new ponds there were 24-67 inanga per 100 m2.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrodynamic Modelling of the Maketu Estuary and Lower Kaituna River
    http://waikato.researchgateway.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. HYDRODYNAMIC AND WATER QUALITY MODELLING OF THE LOWER KAITUNA RIVER AND MAKETU ESTUARY A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth and Ocean Sciences at The University of Waikato by Nigel David Goodhue University of Waikato 2007 Abstract The Maketu Estuary is a shallow intertidal estuary (2.3 km 2) located in the Bay of Plenty, North Island, New Zealand. The Kaituna River contributes the largest freshwater flow into the estuary through control gates. Lake Rotoiti and indirectly Lake Rotorua supply the base flow to the Kaituna River, with tributaries along the 50 km reach also significantly contributing to the flow. Water quality within the river is affected by elevated nutrients, faecal coliforms, high oxygen demand and algae concentrations derived from the lakes as well as contributions from tributaries and industrial and urban discharge.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaituna River Document
    The Kaituna River Document MAI MAKETŪ KI TONGARIRO • TE ARAWA WAKA • TE ARAWA TANGATA MOEMOEĀ – OUR VISION The Kaituna River Ko Kaituna te awa tupua Kaituna our guardian is in a healthy state Ko Kaituna te mauri ora Kaituna our life force and protected for Ko Kaituna te awa tūpuna Kaituna our ancestral river current and future Ko Kaituna te oranga whānui Kaituna our sustenance generations. Ko Kaituna te awa honohono Kaituna a connector of people i te tangata From the lakes to the sea Mai uta ki te tai NGĀ WHĀINGA – OUR OBJECTIVES Objective 1 The traditional and contemporary relationships that iwi and hapū have with the Kaituna River are provided for, recognised and protected. Objective 2 Iwi-led projects which restore, protect and/or enhance the Kaituna River are actively encouraged, promoted and supported by Te Maru o Kaituna through its Action Plan. Objective 3 Water quality and the mauri of the water in the Kaituna River are restored to a healthy state and meet agreed standards. Objective 4 There is sufficient water quantity in the Kaituna River to: a Support the mauri of rivers and streams. b Protect tangata whenua values. c Protect ecological values. d Protect recreational values. Objective 5 Water from the Kaituna River is sustainably allocated and efficiently used to provide for the social, economic and cultural well-being of iwi, hapū and communities, now and for future generations. Objective 6 The environmental well-being of the Kaituna River is enhanced through improved land management practices. Objective 7 Ecosystem health, habitats that support indigenous vegetation and species, and wetlands within the Kaituna River are restored, protected and enhanced.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Kaituna Catchment and Water Quality Prepared by Stephen Park, Senior Environmental Scientist
    Lower Kaituna Catchment and Water Quality Prepared by Stephen Park, Senior Environmental Scientist Environment Bay of Plenty Environmental Publication 2007/16 5 Quay Street P O Box 364 Whakatane NEW ZEALAND ISSN: 1175 9372 Working with our communities for a better environment E mahi ngatahi e pai ake ai te taiao Environment Bay of Plenty Acknowledgements The assistance of John McIntosh in providing background information for this review has been invaluable. Cover Photo: Ohineangaanga Stream (Te Puke State Highway 2) during moderate rainfall event 30 June 2007. Environmental Report 2007/16 Lower Kaituna Catchment and Water Quality Environment Bay of Plenty i Executive Summary This report reviews water quality related information available for the lower Kaituna River catchment, the Kaituna River and Maketu Estuary. There has been long-term deterioration in the quality of the water in the upper catchment and lakes. Extensive research has become available as part of the outcomes from the Rotorua/Rotoiti Actions Plan. This adds to Environment Bay of Plenty’s long term monitoring and provides excellent coverage of the state and predicted changes in lake quality and the effects on the Kaituna River. However in the lower catchment and Kaituna River itself there are also increasing pressures from land use change, discharges and even proposed hydroelectric schemes which need to be addressed. Reports detailing water quality data for the Kaituna River show marked increases in nutrient concentrations in the lower reaches. Oxidised nitrogen shows the greatest degree of increase (an order of magnitude) but the increase in total nitrogen, which roughly doubles, is not so marked.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kaituna River Document Summary
    THE KAITUNA RIVER DOCUMENT SUMMARY kaituna.org.nz MOEMOEĀ – OUR VISION The Kaituna River is in a healthy state and protected for current and future generations. What is this about? What area does the document influence? Te Maru o Kaituna River Authority has prepared and approved Kaituna, he taonga tuku iho - a treasure handed down which The river document covers the Kaituna River and its tributaries guides the management of the Kaituna River and its tributaries within the Kaituna co-governance framework area, which is into the future. It is a statement of partnership and co-governance shown on pages 5 – 7. The area starts at the top of the Kaituna and builds on community energy and commitment that was River and includes the Kaituna, Mangorewa and Paraiti rivers and previously given to the Kaituna River and Ōngātoro/Maketū more than 24 tributary streams. Estuary Strategy. It represents the culmination of input from the Kaituna community and is a signpost for local government, iwi and Who is Te Maru o Kaituna the wider community, including existing river users and other River Authority? stakeholders, to collaborate in achieving our collective vision, objectives and outcomes. The document balances competing Te Maru o Kaituna River Authority (TMoK) is the co-governance environmental, social, cultural, recreational and economic partnership set by the Tapuika Claims Settlement Act 2014. interests while ensuring the mauri (life force) of the river is maintained, which requires collective action and support. The partnership is made up of iwi representatives from Tapuika Iwi Authority Trust, Te Kapu Ō Waitaha, Te Pumautanga o Te This summary highlights the vision, objectives and desired Arawa Trust, Te Tāhuhu o Tawakeheimoa Trust, Ngāti Whakaue, outcomes to promote the restoration, protection and and council representatives from the Bay of Plenty Regional enhancement of the Kaituna River and its tributaries.
    [Show full text]