Laogai Handbook 劳改手册 2007-2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Laogai Handbook 劳改手册 2007-2008 L A O G A I HANDBOOK 劳 改 手 册 2007 – 2008 The Laogai Research Foundation Washington, DC 2008 The Laogai Research Foundation, founded in 1992, is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization [501 (c) (3)] incorporated in the District of Columbia, USA. The Foundation’s purpose is to gather information on the Chinese Laogai - the most extensive system of forced labor camps in the world today – and disseminate this information to journalists, human rights activists, government officials and the general public. Directors: Harry Wu, Jeffrey Fiedler, Tienchi Martin-Liao LRF Board: Harry Wu, Jeffrey Fiedler, Tienchi Martin-Liao, Lodi Gyari Laogai Handbook 劳改手册 2007-2008 Copyright © The Laogai Research Foundation (LRF) All Rights Reserved. The Laogai Research Foundation 1109 M St. NW Washington, DC 20005 Tel: (202) 408-8300 / 8301 Fax: (202) 408-8302 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.laogai.org ISBN 978-1-931550-25-3 Published by The Laogai Research Foundation, October 2008 Printed in Hong Kong US $35.00 Our Statement We have no right to forget those deprived of freedom and 我们没有权利忘却劳改营中失去自由及生命的人。 life in the Laogai. 我们在寻求真理, 希望这类残暴及非人道的行为早日 We are seeking the truth, with the hope that such horrible 消除并且永不再现。 and inhumane practices will soon cease to exist and will never recur. 在中国,民主与劳改不可能并存。 In China, democracy and the Laogai are incompatible. THE LAOGAI RESEARCH FOUNDATION Table of Contents Code Page Code Page Preface 前言 ...............................................................…1 23 Shandong Province 山东省.............................................. 377 Introduction 概述 .........................................................…4 24 Shanghai Municipality 上海市 .......................................... 407 Laogai Terms and Abbreviations 25 Shanxi Province 山西省 ................................................... 423 劳改单位及缩写............................................................28 26 Sichuan Province 四川省 ................................................. 437 Readers’ Guide 读者指南.............................................29 27 Tianjin Municipality 天津市............................................... 461 Map of the People’s Republic of China 28 Xinjiang Uighur Aut. Region 新疆自治区 .......................... 467 中华人民共和国地图.....................................................30 29 Xizang Aut. Region (Tibet) 西藏自治区............................ 487 01 Anhui Province 安徽省.................................................31 30 Yunnan Province 云南省.................................................. 491 02 Beijing Municipality 北京市...........................................47 31 Zhejiang Province 浙江省 ................................................ 511 03 Chongqing Municipality 重庆市 ....................................59 Involvement of US Customs Agencies 04 Fujian Province 福建省 ................................................65 美国海关总署制裁劳改产品的措施................................... 523 05 Gansu Province 甘肃省................................................81 Selected Hearings, Briefings, and Resolutions Regarding 06 Guangdong Province 广东省 .......................................93 the Laogai and Related Issues 07 Guangxi Aut. Region 广西壮族自治区........................119 劳改问题听证会及决议..................................................... 527 08 Guizhou Province 贵州省...........................................129 Selected Hearings and Roundtables Held by the 09 Hainan Province 海南省.............................................145 Congressional-Executive Commission on China 10 Hebei Province 河北省...............................................149 美国国会行政部门中国委员会听证会 ............................... 530 11 Heilongjiang Province 黑龙江省.................................161 Remarks by Jeffrey Fielder before the U.S.-China Economic 12 Henan Province 河南省..............................................183 and Security Review Commission 13 Hubei Province 湖北省...............................................207 杰弗·费德勒在美中经济与安全检查委员会的发言.......... 532 14 Hunan Province 湖南省..............................................229 H. Con. Res. 294 美国国会谴责劳改的决议 ..................... 533 15 Inner Mongolia Aut. Region 内蒙古自治区 ................255 Text of Resolution of the German Bundestag 16 Jiangsu Province 江苏省............................................271 德国议会谴责劳改的决议 ................................................. 535 17 Jiangxi Province 江西省 .............................................291 Publications by the Laogai Research Foundation 18 Jilin Province 吉林省..................................................301 劳改基金会出版物............................................................ 537 19 Liaoning Province 辽宁省...........................................315 Official Legislative Documents on Reform Through 20 Ningxia Aut. Region 宁夏自治区 ................................345 Labor and Reeducation Through Labor In the PRC 21 Qinghai Province 青海省............................................351 中华人民共和国劳改劳教法令与资料 ............................... 542 22 Shaanxi Province 陕西省 ...........................................365 Preface/前言 Preface had been buying poisonous food and toxic toys from China. Recently, China has frequently found itself at the forefront of Thus, despite China’s intense propaganda offensive, the outside the international stage, most notably as the host of the 2008 world has still managed to get several glimpses of the Summer Olympic Games. China’s leaders had long awaited considerable challenges facing its authoritarian leadership. this opportunity to showcase the new face of China – one that Indeed, to an objective observer, the news coming from China is modern, prosperous, and proud. But while Beijing succeeded reveals that in many measures of a great nation – in delivering stunning performances, both in the athletic events environmental protection and sustainable development, and in the Olympic ceremonies, the image of a “harmonious” equality of economic opportunity and access to social welfare, nation that it wished to project was undermined by other public health, fair labor conditions, and so on – China has significant events which caught the attention of the fallen short of international standards. And with regard to international community. human rights in particular, China has without a doubt failed to meet its Olympic expectations. In March 2008 the world watched as China responded to widespread demonstrations in its Tibetan areas with a forceful, The Laogai, China’s brutal system of labor camps, remains one indiscriminate crackdown on the Tibetan community, including of the most glaring blemishes on China’s human rights record. monks and nuns. Another incident was China’s reaction to the Although the term Laogai (reform through labor) was replaced massive earthquake that devastated parts of Sichuan on May in official use with jianyu (prison) in 1994, so as to suggest to 12th . Reporting conditions, which were initially quite free after Western countries that the Chinese penal system was not so the disaster, quickly became restrictive after stories began to different than theirs, the true nature of the Laogai has not emerge of grieving parents blaming substandard construction changed. The Laogai slogan “Reform first, production second,” of school buildings for the deaths of their children. China has continues to appear on prison gates and the millions of Laogai also frustrated the international community in recent years with prisoners continue to endure “reform” exercises that entail its continuing support of other dictatorial regimes in Sudan, forced labor, political indoctrination, and often, physical and Myanmar, and Zimbabwe. Not only has China provided these mental abuse. Moreover, the Laojiao (reeducation through regimes with diplomatic protection, but it has also supplied labor) component of the Laogai system, which reappeared in them with arms. Also, although China still holds its champion the early 1980’s and allows for the arrest and detention of petty status in the field of cheap exports, the health and safety criminals for up to three years without formal charge or trial, is standards of its products came into question last year when not even considered by the Chinese government to qualify as a consumers in the US and throughout the world discovered they prison. Rather, it is regarded as a form of administrative 1 Laogai Handbook/劳改手册 detention and is often employed against political and religious and the government still offers incentives to enterprises relying dissidents. on prison labor to export products. In a recent research project conducted by the Laogai Research Foundation, 256 Laogai In addition to serving as an instrument of repression, the camps were found to have 314 separate commercial listings on Laogai also functions as a commercial enterprise, exploiting its one of two online Dun & Bradstreet business databases. These large supply of free labor to generate revenue for prison camps produce 72 different types of products, ranging from officials and for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). clothing to electronics, ceramics to sugar. Thus, trade of According to the Criminal Reform Handbook issued by the Chinese prison labor products, albeit largely driven Ministry of Justice in 1988, the Laogai “organizes criminals in underground, seems to be as prevalent as ever. labor and production, thus creating wealth for society.” Prisoners are engaged in a wide array of economic endeavors, In 1992, the Laogai Research Foundation (LRF) was including manufacturing, farming, mining, construction, etc. established to gather information and to educate the public They are forced to work up to
Recommended publications
  • Documented Cases of Falun Gong Practitioners "Sentenced" to Prison Camps Based on Reports Received January - June 2009 Falun Dafa Information Center
    Documented Cases of Falun Gong Practitioners "Sentenced" to Prison Camps Based on Reports Received January - June 2009 Falun Dafa Information Center Name Date of Sentence Place currently Scheduled date Initial place of Case # Name (Chinese) Age Gender Occupation Date of Sentencing Charges City Province Court Judge's name Lawyer Notes (Pinyin)2 Detention length detained of release detention Employee of No.8 Arrested with his wife at his mother-in-law's Mine of the Coal Pingdingshan Henan Zhengzhou Prison in Xinmi Pingdingshan City 1 Liu Gang 刘刚 m 18-May-08 early 2009 18 2027 home; transferred to current prison around Corporation of City Province City, Henan Province Detention Center March 18, 2009 Pingdingshan City Nong'an Nong'an 2 Wei Cheng 魏成 37 m 27-Sep-07 27-Mar-09 18 Jilin Province Guo Qingxi March, 2027 Arrested from home; County County Court Zhejiang Fuyang Zhejiang Province 3 Jin Meihua 金美华 47 f 19-Nov-08 15 Fuyang City November, 2023 Province City Court Women's Prison Nong'an Nong'an 4 Han Xixiang 韩希祥 42 m Sep-07 27-Mar-09 14 Jilin Province County Guo Qingxi March, 2023 Arrested from home; County Court Nong'an Nong'an 5 Li Fengming 李凤明 45 m 27-Sep-07 27-Mar-09 14 Jilin Province County Guo Qingxi March, 2023 Arrested from home; County Court Arrested from home; detained until late April Liaoning Liaoning Province Fushun Nangou 6 Qi Huishu 齐会书 f 24-May-08 Apr-09 14 Fushun City 2023 2009, and then sentenced in secret and Province Women's Prison Detention Center transferred to current prison.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2 Anhui Province Anhui Wanzhong Group Co., Ltd.1, Affiliated with The
    2.2 Anhui Province Anhui Wanzhong Group Co., Ltd.1, affiliated with the Anhui Provincial Prison Administration Bureau, has 27 prison enterprises Legal representative of the prison company: Xu Xiaogang, Chairman of the company and Director of the Anhui Provincial Prison Administration Bureau.2 The company’s registered capital is 443.469 million yuan. Its total assets amounted to 1.5 billion yuan. Founded in December 1996, it has 19 wholly-owned subsidiaries (other information indicates that it has 27 prison enterprises) spreading out in 11 cities and counties in the province, with more than 7,000 regular workers and 47,000 prisoners. Its main products include railway sleeper fasteners, medium and low-pressure valves, automotive forgings, power accessories, textiles and garments, cement and building materials, specialty agricultural products, various types of labor processing products and hotel catering and other tertiary industry services. In 2007, the group realized an operating income of 1.44 billion yuan and a profit of 82 million yuan, and it paid taxes of 70.9 million yuan. Its total profit and taxes were 156 million yuan. No. Company Name of the Legal Person Legal Registered Business Scope Company Notes on the Prison Name Prison, to and representative / Capital Address which the Shareholder(s) Title Company Belongs 1 Anhui Anhui Anhui Xu Xiaogang 44.3469 Capital management; project 100 Qingxi The Anhui Provincial Prison Administration Province Provincial Provincial Chairman of Anhui million yuan investment, management and Road, Shushan Bureau4 is the administrative agency of the Wanzhong Prison People’s Wanzhong Group operation; material supply and District, Hefei provincial government responsible for the Group Co., Administrati Government Co., Ltd.; Director product sale related to investment City, Anhui administration of prisons throughout the province.
    [Show full text]
  • Laogai Handbook 劳改手册 2007-2008
    L A O G A I HANDBOOK 劳 改 手 册 2007 – 2008 The Laogai Research Foundation Washington, DC 2008 The Laogai Research Foundation, founded in 1992, is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization [501 (c) (3)] incorporated in the District of Columbia, USA. The Foundation’s purpose is to gather information on the Chinese Laogai - the most extensive system of forced labor camps in the world today – and disseminate this information to journalists, human rights activists, government officials and the general public. Directors: Harry Wu, Jeffrey Fiedler, Tienchi Martin-Liao LRF Board: Harry Wu, Jeffrey Fiedler, Tienchi Martin-Liao, Lodi Gyari Laogai Handbook 劳改手册 2007-2008 Copyright © The Laogai Research Foundation (LRF) All Rights Reserved. The Laogai Research Foundation 1109 M St. NW Washington, DC 20005 Tel: (202) 408-8300 / 8301 Fax: (202) 408-8302 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.laogai.org ISBN 978-1-931550-25-3 Published by The Laogai Research Foundation, October 2008 Printed in Hong Kong US $35.00 Our Statement We have no right to forget those deprived of freedom and 我们没有权利忘却劳改营中失去自由及生命的人。 life in the Laogai. 我们在寻求真理, 希望这类残暴及非人道的行为早日 We are seeking the truth, with the hope that such horrible 消除并且永不再现。 and inhumane practices will soon cease to exist and will never recur. 在中国,民主与劳改不可能并存。 In China, democracy and the Laogai are incompatible. THE LAOGAI RESEARCH FOUNDATION Table of Contents Code Page Code Page Preface 前言 ...............................................................…1 23 Shandong Province 山东省.............................................. 377 Introduction 概述 .........................................................…4 24 Shanghai Municipality 上海市 .......................................... 407 Laogai Terms and Abbreviations 25 Shanxi Province 山西省 ................................................... 423 劳改单位及缩写............................................................28 26 Sichuan Province 四川省 ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • China (Includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau) 2018 Human Rights Report
    CHINA (INCLUDES TIBET, HONG KONG, AND MACAU) 2018 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is an authoritarian state in which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is the paramount authority. CCP members hold almost all top government and security apparatus positions. Ultimate authority rests with the CCP Central Committee’s 25-member Political Bureau (Politburo) and its seven-member Standing Committee. Xi Jinping continued to hold the three most powerful positions as CCP general secretary, state president, and chairman of the Central Military Commission. Civilian authorities maintained control of security forces. During the year the government significantly intensified its campaign of mass detention of members of Muslim minority groups in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region (Xinjiang). Authorities were reported to have arbitrarily detained 800,000 to possibly more than two million Uighurs, ethnic Kazakhs, and other Muslims in internment camps designed to erase religious and ethnic identities. Government officials claimed the camps were needed to combat terrorism, separatism, and extremism. International media, human rights organizations, and former detainees reported security officials in the camps abused, tortured, and killed some detainees. Human rights issues included arbitrary or unlawful killings by the government; forced disappearances by the government; torture by the government; arbitrary detention by the government; harsh and life-threatening prison and detention conditions; political prisoners;
    [Show full text]
  • Report Into Allegations of Organ Harvesting of Falun Gong Practitioners in China
    REPORT INTO ALLEGATIONS OF ORGAN HARVESTING OF FALUN GONG PRACTITIONERS IN CHINA by David Matas and David Kilgour 6 July 2006 The report is also available at http://davidkilgour.ca, http://organharvestinvestigation.net or http://investigation.go.saveinter.net Table of Contents A. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................- 1 - B. WORKING METHODS ...................................................................................................................................- 1 - C. THE ALLEGATION.........................................................................................................................................- 2 - D. DIFFICULTIES OF PROOF ...........................................................................................................................- 3 - E. METHODS OF PROOF....................................................................................................................................- 4 - F. ELEMENTS OF PROOF AND DISPROOF...................................................................................................- 5 - 1) PERCEIVED THREAT .......................................................................................................................................... - 5 - 2) A POLICY OF PERSECUTION .............................................................................................................................. - 9 - 3) INCITEMENT TO HATRED ................................................................................................................................-
    [Show full text]
  • China Human Rights Report 2013》
    ሂᣉӔѹ௄ࠛྻ Taiwan Foundation for Democracy 本出版品係由財團法人臺灣民主基金會負責出版。臺灣民主基金會是 一個獨立、非營利的機構,其宗旨在促進臺灣以及全球民主、人權的 研究與發展。臺灣民主基金會成立於二○○三年,是亞洲第一個國家 級民主基金會,未來基金會志在與其他民主國家合作,促進全球新一 波的民主化。 This is a publication of the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (TFD). The TFD is an independent, non-profit foundation dedicated to the study and promotion of democracy and human rights in Taiwan and abroad. Founded in 2003, the TFD is the first democracy assistance foundation established in Asia. The Foundation is committed to the vision of working together with other democracies, to advance a new wave of democratization worldwide. 本報告由臺灣民主基金會負責出版,報告內容不代表本會意見。 版權所有,非經本會事先書面同意,不得翻印、轉載及翻譯。 This report has been published by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy. Statements of fact or opinion appearing in this report do not imply endorsement by the publisher. All rights reserved. No portion of the contents may be reproduced in any form or by any means without prior written permission of the publisher. 臺灣民主基金會 Taiwan Foundation for Democracy 《China Human Rights Report 2013》 目 次 Foreword..................................................................................................... i Preface........................................................................................................ 1 Social Rights............................................................................................. 27 Political Rights.......................................................................................... 63 Judicial Rights..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CHINA the Church of Almighty God: Prisoners Database (1663 Cases)
    CHINA The Church of Almighty God: Prisoners Database (1663 cases) Prison term: 15 years HE Zhexun Date of birth: On 18th September 1963 Date and place of arrest: On 10th March 2009, in Xuchang City, Henan Province Charges: Disturbing social order and using a Xie Jiao organization to undermine law enforcement because of being an upper-level leader of The Church of Almighty God in mainland China, who was responsible for the overall work of the church Statement of the defendant: He disagreed with the decision and said what he believed in is not a Xie Jiao. Court decision: In February 2010, he was sentenced to 15 years in prison by the Zhongyuan District People’s Court of Zhengzhou City, Henan Province. Place of imprisonment: No. 1 Prison of Henan Province Other information: He was regarded by the Chinese authorities as a major criminal of the state and had long been on the wanted list. To arrest him, authorities offered 500,000 RMB as a reward to informers who gave tips leading to his arrest to police. He was arrested at the home of a Christian in Xuchang City, Henan Province. Based on the information from a Christian serving his sentence in the same prison, HE Zhexun was imprisoned in a separate area and not allowed to contact other prisoners. XIE Gao, ZOU Yuxiong, SONG Xinling and GAO Qinlin were arrested in succession alongside him and sentenced to prison terms ranging from 11 to 12 years. Source: https://goo.gl/aGkHBj Prison term: 14 years MENG Xiumei Age: Forty-one years old Date and place of arrest: On 14th August 2014, in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region Charges: Using a Xie Jiao organization to undermine law enforcement because of being a leader of The Church of Almighty God and organizing gatherings for Christians and the work of preaching the gospel in Ili prefecture Statement of the defendant: She claimed that her act did not constitute crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Enclosure 1 Two Typical Cases CASE 1
    Enclosure 1 Two Typical Cases CASE 1: Meng Xiumei 1. Family name: Meng 2. First name: Xiumei 3. Sex: Female 4. Birth date or age (at the time of detention): March 4, 1973 5. Nationality/Nationalities: Chinese 6. (a) Identity document (if any): ID card (b) Issued by: Shihezi Municipal Public Security Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (c) On (date): March 11, 2013 (d) No.: 650300197303045927 7 . Address of usual residence: Room 201, Unit 1, Building 49, Jun Yue Long Ting Community, Feijichang Road, Yining City, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (新疆维吾尔自治 区伊宁市飞机场路君悦龙庭小区49号楼1单元201室) II. Arrest 1. Date of arrest: September 20, 2014 2. Place of arrest: Room 201, Unit 1, Building 49, Jun Yue Long Ting Community, Feijichang Road, Yining City, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 3. Forces who carried out the arrest t: National Security Brigade of Yining Municipal Public Security Bureau, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 4. Details On the afternoon of August 14, 2014, when the police officers from the National Security Brigade of Yining Municipal Public Security Bureau arrested Meng Xiumei, one of them swung a piece of documentation in his 1 hand, saying, “We’re from the Public Security Bureau, and this is our search warrant.” With these words, they started to rummage through the rooms. A week later, on approximately August 22 or 23, the captain of the National Security Brigade, together with another police officer, came to Meng Xiumei’s home again to give her family the Detention Warrant. 5. Authority who issued the warrant or decision: Yining Municipal Public Security Bureau, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice
    1 CRIMINAL JUSTICE Introduction During the Commission’s 2017 reporting year, Chinese govern- ment and Communist Party officials continued to abuse criminal law and police power to further their priorities in ‘‘maintaining so- cial stability’’ and perpetuating one-party rule at the expense of in- dividual freedoms.1 Ongoing Use of Arbitrary Detention Extralegal and extrajudicial forms of detention that restrict a person’s liberty without judicial oversight 2 violate Article 9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) 3 and Article 9(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).4 Some commonly used forms of extralegal and extrajudicial detention in China are described below. BLACK JAILS ‘‘Black jails’’ are detention sites that operate outside of China’s judicial and administrative detention systems.5 After the Chinese government abolished the reeducation through labor system in 2013,6 the Commission continued to observe Chinese authorities’ use of ‘‘black jails’’ 7—including a type known as ‘‘legal education centers’’ 8—to suppress individuals such as Falun Gong practi- tioners 9 and petitioners.10 The Commission also observed multiple reports of Chinese authorities detaining rights advocates in ‘‘black jails’’ prior to and during the annual meetings of the National Peo- ple’s Congress and Chinese People’s Political Consultative Con- ference in March 2017.11 [For more information on Falun Gong practitioners and petitioners, see Section II—Freedom of Religion and Section III—Access to Justice.] PSYCHIATRIC
    [Show full text]
  • D I a L O G U E Foundation
    THE DUI HUA D I A L O G U E FOUNDATION Issue 16 z Summer 2004 US-China Dialogue Stymied After IN THIS ISSUE: Geneva, Abu Ghraib US-China Dialogue Stymied After pril was a cruel month for US human and hypocrite,” Dong Yunhu, secretary gen- Geneva, Abu rights diplomacy in China, dominated eral of China’s government-supported Ghraib byA the defeat of Washington’s latest China China Society for Human Rights Studies, 1-3 resolution at the UN Human Rights Com- said that the mistreatment of Iraqi prison- Kamm Visits mission in Geneva and breaking news, in the ers “ruined mankind’s dignity, trampled in- Denmark and month’s waning days, of the abuse of Iraqi ternational human rights conventions and Switzerland prisoners by American soldiers at Abu humanitarian laws, and constituted a sys- 3 Ghraib Prison in Baghdad. Alleged abuse of temic and gross violation of human rights.” China’s “Modern political prisoners in Chinese prisons has long In the words of a senior Chinese diplo- and Civilized” been a theme of American complaints mat interviewed for this story by Dialogue, Prison System against Beijing, and there was barely con- “It is not necessarily a bad thing these days 4-5 cealed glee in China’s capital at the tables to have been criticized by the US on human Court Web Sites having turned so decisively against rights.” In his last testimony before leaving Promising Source Washington. his position as Assistant Secretary of State for Obscure Case The attempt to pass a China resolution for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, Research at the 60th
    [Show full text]
  • Page Replies to Initial Written Questions
    Index Page Replies to initial written questions raised by Finance Committee Members in examining the Estimates of Expenditure 2018-19 Director of Bureau : Director of Administration Session No. : 3 File Name : CSO-2-e1.doc Reply Serial Question No. Serial No. Name of Member Head Programme CSO001 1588 CHAN Chi-chuen 142 (1) Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Office CSO002 1599 CHAN Chi-chuen 142 (2) Government Records Service CSO003 1600 CHAN Chi-chuen 142 (2) Government Records Service CSO004 1602 CHAN Chi-chuen 142 (1) Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Office CSO005 1603 CHAN Chi-chuen 142 (3) CSO-Administration Wing CSO006 0719 CHAN Tanya 142 (2) Government Records Service CSO007 0720 CHAN Tanya 142 (2) Government Records Service CSO008 0723 CHAN Tanya 142 (3) CSO-Administration Wing CSO009 0731 CHAN Tanya 142 (2) Government Records Service CSO010 0458 CHENG Chung-tai 142 (3) CSO-Administration Wing CSO011 0459 CHENG Chung-tai 142 (3) CSO-Administration Wing CSO012 2499 KWOK Wing-hang, 142 (4) Protocol Division Dennis CSO013 2500 KWOK Wing-hang, 142 (5) Subvention: Duty Lawyer Dennis Service and Legal Aid Services Council CSO014 0273 LAU Ip-keung, 142 (2) Government Records Kenneth Service CSO015 2387 LEUNG Kenneth 142 (1) Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Office CSO016 2388 LEUNG Kenneth 142 (1) Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Office CSO017 2412 LEUNG Kenneth 142 (1) Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Office CSO018 3296 LEUNG Yiu-chung 142 (3) CSO-Administration Wing Reply Serial Question No. Serial No. Name of Member Head
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice
    1 CRIMINAL JUSTICE Arbitrary Detention Authorities continued to use various forms of arbitrary detention to deprive individuals of their liberty, contravening international human rights standards.1 The UN Working Group on Arbitrary De- tention classifies detention as ‘‘arbitrary’’ when there is no legal basis for the deprivation of liberty, when detention results from the exercise of certain fundamental rights, or when non-observance of international fair trial norms is particularly serious.2 Descriptions of selected forms of arbitrary detention follow. [For information on arbitrary detention in ‘‘political reeducation’’ centers, see Section IV—Xinjiang.] BLACK JAILS Authorities continued to hold individuals in ‘‘black jails,’’ extra- legal detention sites that operate outside of China’s judicial and ad- ministrative detention systems.3 In some cases, authorities held pe- titioners (those who use the petitioning system, or xinfang, to re- port grievances to authorities) in ‘‘black jails’’ in connection to ‘‘sta- bility maintenance’’ efforts during or near the 19th National Con- gress of the Chinese Communist Party in October 2017 and annual meetings of the National People’s Congress and Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference in March 2018.4 Examples in- clude petitioners Wei Qin, held in Chongming district, Shanghai municipality; 5 Cai Xiaomin,6 held in Pudong district, Shanghai;7 Liu Yu,8 held in Qionglai city, Chengdu municipality, Sichuan province; 9 and at least 14 petitioners in Wuhan municipality, Hubei province.10 Authorities
    [Show full text]