War Dept. Document No. 2042, American Coast

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

War Dept. Document No. 2042, American Coast Ordnance Department Document No. 2042 AMERICAN COAST ARTILLERY MATERIEL PREPARED IN TilE OFFICE OF TilE CHIEF OF ORDNANCE June, 1922 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ORDNANCE DEPARTMENT Document No. 2042 Office of the Chief of Ordnance l. ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT $1.00 PER COpy PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COpy FOR PROFlf.-PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAY Il, 1922 ,VAR DEP ART!IENT, 'VASHINGTON, June, 19;813. The following publication, entitled "American Coast Artillery l\lateriel," is published for the information and guidance of all students of the Ordnance. training schools, and other similar edu- cational organizations. The contents should not be republished without authority of the Chief of Ordnance, 'Var Department, 'Vash- ington, D. C. By ORDEROF THE SECRETA~Y OF tV AR. JOHN J. PERSHING, General of the Armies, Ohief of Staff. OFFICIAL: ROBERT C. DAVIS, . Acting The Adjutant General. (III) PREFACE. This treatise on coast artillery is supposed to deal primarily with American artillery and to include such data, description, etc., as can be given in one volume of reasonaole size and ~till cover the hjstory of development, the design and manufacture of a modern great seacoast gun and carriage, and detailed descriptions of existing seacoast weapons to the satisfaction of the casual student of the subject. Since America is relatively a new country, it is of course necessary to deal with artillery of any and every country in attempting to trace the history of the development of ammunition, guns, and carriages. Careful survey of Part I will reveal that the history of the devel- opment of artillery in the years 1400 to 1850 is not a history. of the development of the science or art of artillery, but simply a history of the development of the craftman's ability to cast or forge objects of greater and greater weight or more complicated design as to shape. The gun of 1850 is merely the gun -of 1400 multiplied one hundred times or more in weight .. The real development in artillery has taken place since 1850 and is coincident with the great and rapid development in every line of mechanical invention. A discussion of America1l; coast artillery hence .does gi ve a fair idea of the steps in the development 'of such artillery of all nations, because coast artillery has acquired its pronounced individual char- acteristics during this short period of rapid development. Before 1850 the same gun, carriage, and ammunition might be and were used indiscriminately on ships of war, in coast fortifications, or in the field- for siege purposes. The o~ject of this treatise is to present to the student of coast artillery both a mental picture of the development of artillery in general from the thirteenth century, when it seems to have made its first appearance, through the various centuries as simply artillery, und through the past century when it has become sufficiently distinct to be termed seacoast artillery. In addition, it is desired to present as complete as practicable a description or outline of the procedure in determining the requirements of a modern high-power seacoast weapon, the various steps in design, and the important p~oblems)in- volved in the manufacture. A third part is devoted to a detailed description of each distinct type of mechanism found on all of the (IVi v seacoast weapons now in 'u.se in our various fortifications. It is the policy in discussing guns, carriages, and mechanisms to discuss each type in detail but once; that is, if a certain type of elevating mecha- nism is used on a number of carriages it will be discussed in detail but once. Thereafter merely a refel'encewill be given to the detailed discussion. There is no type of manufacture in America that involves the same . severity of requirements as that required in the development, design, and manufacture of our modern seacoast weapons. It is to be hoped that the.day will come when the Ordnance Departments of the Army and Navy will be recognized and will take their place as the pace makers in the art of machine design and will set the standards for the mechanical engineering world. In no other industry is it re- quired to machine parts weighing as much as 100 tons to a degr~e of accuracy represented by a tolerance of only a few thousandths of an inch; nor is there an industry which deals with problems involv- ing pressures so great as 40,000 pounds per square inch; or with the equally difficult problem of providing for the transmission during a very small fraction of a second of millions of foot-pounds of energy through parts which must continue to operate day after day with absolute accuracy into foundations embedded in the earth. 'Vhen it is remembered that the modern high-power seacoast weapon will weigh a total of 1,000,000.pounds, must operate with such a speed as to permit the firing of one projectile weighing 2,400 pounds or more to a distance of 35 miles with such a degree of accuracy as to strike with telling effect a modern battleship, some littleapprecia- . tion of the problems of design and manufacture can be secured. It is hoped that this presentation on the basis of the general devel- opment and history of artillery, the determination of requirements, the design and manufacture of a modern seacoast weapon, and the detailed description of all distinct types of mechanisms will serve the purpose of giving to the early as well as the advanced student such a comprehension of the problems of development, design, and manufacture of seacoast artillery as will enable him to render more efficient service in any branch of the Army having to do with any type of artillery. ' The information contained herein has been secured from the sources listed in the bibliography, from inspection of the material discussed, and from consultation with engineers responsible for vari- ous requirements and designs or familiar with them. Paragraphs 37 to GO were prepared by Doctor (Colonel) Storm, of the Ammuni- tion Division, and have been previously published in No. 10, Volume II, of Army Ordnance. II. 'V. :MILLER, Lieuterwnt Oolonel, O. R. O. TABLE OF CONTENTS. PART I. Page. History of the development of artillery '____ 1 PART II. The design and manufacture of a great seacoast 'veapon_______________ 144, PART III. Detailed descriptions of American seacoast guns and mounts__________ 221 PART IV. Table of miscellaneous data ..;._________________________________ 488 (VII) PART 1. - HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPl\fENT OF ARTILLERY. GENERAL INTRODUCTION. 1. It is intended in this history of the development of artil- lery and ammunition to point out, at least briefly, the various steps that have led from the invention of discovery of gunpowder to the present state of perfection in ammunition, guns, and carriages. It may.be well to mention in advance a conclusion to which one seems certain to come in the extended study of this development. All indi- cations are that practically each step in the development was forced by circumstances and actually became a recognized advance in the art many. years, sometimes centuries, after the time when it might have been adopted to the advantage of all ~oncerned. For example, hand rifles had been perfected to the point of rather efficient use for sporting purposes as early as 1800. No soldier nor those responsible for i~suing them to soldiers would have thought of using an Army musket for hunting game if he could secure a rifle. In spite of the known fact that only one in each 450 bullets fired from an Army musket would find its mark in war, it was used in our wars of 1812, 1845, and even in the great Civil 'Val' of 1860-1864. The rifle had been introduced into the French ArmY' in 1800, but Napoleon with- drew it, probably because of the great amount of time required for loading, and it was not again used by them until 1870. The British . • did not adopt it until about 1860. And during all of this time it was the weapon par excellence for sporting purposes. Since this is an example of the general tendency in the development of the Rrt or science of artillery one should not he surprised at' even the present backwardness of it in any particular respect. These comments are entered as illustrations of. tendencies and not as a criticism of any organization or jndividuals. It is probable that we will always have our spurts of development just after a great conflict which points out tragically our backwardness in any branch of the science. This , is certainly true at the end of the 'Vorld 'Val'. 2. It has been particularly difficult to trace the earliest develop- ment in ammunition and likewise the corresponding development in artillery. There are numerous reference in many more or less (1) 2 modern books to apparent records of the invention or discovery of gunpowder in the fourth to the sixth centuries A. D., and to the use of this substance in some sort of guns, pots, or mortars in the sieges of such cities' as ~fecca, Constantinople, etc., during these same centuries. The' first siege of I~feccaoccurred in 683 A. D., and at that time the sacred Black Stone was broken by fire. References can be found to the fact that in this siege the mixture familiarly known as "'Vildfire" was' used by the besiegers and that these balls of pitch, naphtha, and sulphur were hurled over the walls by some sort of mechanical projecting engine.
Recommended publications
  • Materializing the Military
    MATERIALIZING THE MILITARY Edited by Bernard Finn Barton C Hacker Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC Associate Editors Robert Bud Science Museum, London Helmuth Trischler Deutsches Museum, Munich . sCience museum Published 2005 by NMSI Trading Ltd, Science Museum, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2DD All rights reserved © 2005 Board ofTrustees of the Science Museum, except for contributions from employees of US national museums Designed by Jerry Fowler Printed in England by the Cromwell Press ISBN 1 90074760 X ISSN 1029-3353 Website http://www.nmsi.ac.uk Artefacts series: studies in the history of science and technology In growing numbers, historians are using technological artefacts in the study and interpretation of the recent past. Their work is still largely pioneering, as they investigate approaches and modes of presentation. But the consequences are already richly rewarding. To encourage this enterprise, three of the world's greatest repositories of the material heritage of science and technology: the Deutsches Museum, the Science Museum and the Smithsonian Institution, are collaborating on this book series. Each volume treats a particular subject area, using objects to explore a wide range of issues related to science, technology and medicine and their place in society. Edited by Robert Bud, Science Museum, London Bernard Finn, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC Helmuth Trischler, Deutsches Museum, Munich Volume 1 Manifesting Medicine Principal Editor Robert Bud Volume 2 Exposing Electronics Principal Editor Bernard Finn Volume 3 Tackling Transport Principal Editors Helmuth Trischler and Stefan Zeilinger Volume 4 Presenting Pictures Principal Editor Bernard Finn Volume 5 Materializing the Military Principal Editors Bernard Finn and Barton C Hacker Volume.
    [Show full text]
  • A Late Medieval Or Early Modern Light Gun Barrel from the Castle Museum in Malbork—Typology, Technology of Manufacture and Identification of the Smelting Process
    Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences (2019) 11:2007–2026 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-018-0653-3 ORIGINAL PAPER A late medieval or early modern light gun barrel from the Castle Museum in Malbork—typology, technology of manufacture and identification of the smelting process Grzegorz Żabiński1 & Mateusz Biborski2 & Ewelina A. Miśta-Jakubowska3 Received: 9 February 2018 /Accepted: 3 May 2018 /Published online: 18 May 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract The paper discusses a gun barrel of a possibly late 15th-early 16th c. date from the collection of the Castle Museum in Malbork (Marienburg), Poland (MZM/468/MT). The barrel was originally part of a hand-held gun (a hackbut?) and was later converted into a light cannon. The barrel was made from unevenly carburised soft steel (c. 0.1–0.2% C). Both metallographic examinations and the analysis of slag inclusions with the use of multivariate statistics suggest that the metal in the barrel was manufactured using the direct (bloomery) smelting process. Keywords 15th–16th c. Military . Light artillery . Hand-held firearms . Hackbut . Castle Museum in Malbork . Archaeometallurgy . Archaeometry . Slag inclusion analysis . Multivariate statistics Introduction It is generally assumed that iron barrels of hand-held firearms were made by forge-welding one or several iron pieces on an iron The aim of this paper is to discuss an iron light cannon barrel core. The barrel was then stopped in the rear (breech) part with a from the collection of the Castle Museum in Malbork cylindrical peg. Hooks, if present, were then separately forge- (Marienburg), Poland (inv. No. MZM/468/MT).
    [Show full text]
  • Prices of Weapons and Munitions in Early Sixteenth Century Holland During the Guelders War1
    James P. Ward Prices of Weapons and Munitions in Early Sixteenth Century Holland during the Guelders War1 1. Introduction The adage that to have peace one has to prepare for war may not be of Classical antiquity but the principle was known to Livy and the Ancients,2 and so the influence of the weapons industry on world peace and economy hardly needs to be emphasized now. The purpose of this article is both to present data on retail prices of individual weapons and munitions of war in the first decades of the sixteenth century in Holland, and to show how the magistrates there prepared to defend their cities against an aggressor by purchasing weapons to arm the citizens. Prices quoted here for strategic commodities of war in the early sixteenth century complement those given by Posthumus in his survey of prices for the later sixteenth century and beyond.3 Kuypers published inventories of weapons maintained in castles and elsewhere in Holland and the Netherlands in the first half of the sixteenth century, but the cities of Holland were not included in his descriptions.4 A recent study by De Jong reveals the growth of the early modern weapons industry in the Republic of the United Netherlands in the period 1585-1621 as part of a process of state formation based on entrepreneurship, economic growth and military reform.5 As sources for the present investigation accounts of the Treasurer for North-Holland at The Hague, and of the city treasurers of Haarlem, Leiden, Dordrecht and Gouda were examined for expenditures on weapons and munitions.
    [Show full text]
  • GURPS Low-Tech Companion 2: Weapons and Warriors Is Copyright © 2010 by Steve Jackson Games Incorporated
    Written by PETER V. DELL’ORTO, DAN HOWARD, and WILLIAM H. STODDARD Edited by SEAN PUNCH Illustrated by ROD REIS An e23 Sourcebook for GURP S® STEVE JACKSON GAMES ® Stock #37-1662 Version 1.0 – December 2010 CONTENTS I NTRODUCTION . 3 The Modern Army . 11 Stakes/Pickets . 26 About the Authors . 3 Naval Warfare . 11 Trench . 26 About GURPS . 3 Roman Field Camp . 26 2. WEAPONS CITY DEFENSES . 27 1. HISTORICAL EVOLUTION AND ARMOR . 12 Ditch and Rampart (TL0) . 27 OF COMBAT GEAR . 4 WEAPON DESIGN . 12 Dry Stone (TL0) . 27 HUNTERS AND GATHERERS . 4 Realistic Weapons . 12 Hard Earth (TL0) . 27 Axes (TL0) . 4 Armor-Piercing Weapons . 12 Hedge (TL0) . 27 Spears (TL0) . 4 Training Weapons . 13 Wooden Palisade (TL0) . 27 Throwing Sticks (TL0) . 4 Combination Weapons . 15 Brick (TL1) . 27 Bolas (TL0) . 4 Determining Weapon ST . 15 Cribwork (TL1) . 28 THE FIRST CIVILIZATIONS . 5 Cinematic Weapons . 16 Mortared Stone (TL1) . 28 Early Warfare . 5 Cool Ethnic Weapons Piled Turf (TL1) . 28 Clubs and Maces (TL0) . 5 and Armor . 16 Concrete (TL2) . 28 Microlithic Edges (TL0) . 5 Throwing the Unthrowable . 17 Embossing (TL2) . 28 Slings (TL0) . 5 Spiky Bits . 18 FORTRESSES . 28 Blades (TL0) . 5 SHIELD OPTIONS . 18 Causewayed Enclosure (TL0) . 28 Circumvallation . 5 Fighting With Shields . 18 Hill Fort (TL1) . 28 Massed Combat . 6 Shield Damage . 19 Terramara (TL1) . 28 The Bow . 6 Customizing Shields . 19 Motte and Bailey (TL2) . 29 The Rise of the Chariot (TL1) . 6 SCALING WEAPONS Castles (TL2) . 29 THE ANCIENT WORLD . 7 AND ARMOR . 20 Guards and Watchers . 29 The Iron Age (TL2) .
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Castle: Mons Meg
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC 222 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90130) Taken into State care: 1906 (Ownership) Last reviewed: 2012 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE EDINBURGH CASTLE: MONS MEG We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH EDINBURGH CASTLE: MONS MEG Note: this statement is one of a series providing a more detailed individual assessment of the significance of particular components of the Edinburgh Castle property in care. Like the others, it should be read in conjunction with the Edinburgh Castle Overview Statement of Significance which provides its wider context and sketches the relationships between various parts of the Castle site. BRIEF DESCRIPTION Mons Meg is one of the oldest surviving pieces of gun-powdered artillery in the world, and probably the most famous example in the United Kingdom. The iron cannon, a form of medieval siege gun known as a bombard, was forged in Mons (modern Belgium) in 1449 and presented by Duke Philip of Burgundy to James II in 1457. Known then simply as 'Mons', the 6-tonne gun was at the leading edge of artillery technology of its day, firing huge gun-stones a distance of almost two miles. By the mid-16th century, however, Mons Meg was obsolete as a field gun and had become a ceremonial gun, firing 'feux de joie' on important national occasions; recorded salutes included celebrating Queen Mary's marriage to the French dauphin in 1558.
    [Show full text]
  • Guns for the Sultan: Military Power and the Weapons Industry in the Ottoman Empire Gabor Agoston Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521843138 - Guns for the Sultan: Military Power and the Weapons Industry in the Ottoman Empire Gabor Agoston Index More information Index Abbreviations: A. Albanian, Ar. Arabic, B. Bulgarian, G. German, Gr. Greek, H. Hungarian, It. Italian, O. Ottoman, P. Polish, R. Russian, S. Southern Slav/general Slavonic, Sl. Slovak, T. Turkish Abbas I (Safavid Shah 1587–1629) 58, 149 Ali Kulu 194 Abd¨ulkadªrEfendi 85, 147 Ali Raik Efendi, Tevkii 161 Abd¨ulkerim (muderris¨ and entrepreneur) Ali Reis (renegade from L¨ubeck) 55 107 ammunition 48 Abyssinia 194 amphibious warfare, see warfare acemi oglan˘ 30 Anadolu, province of 113 admirals, see kapudan Anatolia 27, 137, 172 Adriatic Sea 49, 55, 200 Angiolello, Giovan-Maria 66 map of 43 Antakya, kaza of 99 Afghanistan 15 Arabia, Arab provinces 95, 96, 99, 146, agribar˘ (grippa, small Ottoman vessel) 49, 53, 200 85 Arabic chroniclers, on firearms 15 Agricola, Georgius 100 arabaciyan-i top, see top arabacªlarª Agustos˘ (S. Njegus)ˇ 98 Arakil (Erakil) Efendi 162 kaza of 120 Archipelago 55 Ahmed C¸ avus¸ 106–07, 112 province of 52 Ahmed Efendi 141 archives, Ottoman 13–14 Ahmed Pasha, see Humbaracª Ahmed Pasha armaments industry 1–3, 96 Ahmed Pasha, K¨opr¨ul¨uzadeFazil 201 in Spain 125 Ahmed Pasha, Gedik 49, 67 see also weapons industry Ahmed Pasha, Hain 146 Armenia, Armenians, resettlement Ahtamar, kaza of 99 of 44 Ahtar 150 sappers 40, 42, 48 Akdag,˘ kaza of 116 armies, Ottoman 21–42 Akkirman (S. Bielgorod) 77 Habsburg 23 Akkoyunlu 58 Spanish in Flanders 25 Aksaray, sancak of 98 armorers 29–30, see also cebeci Aksehir,¸ sancak of 98 armory, see Cebehane Alacahisar (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nieuw Historisch Onderzoek Van De Dulle Griet Bombarde in Gent
    NIEUW HISTORISCH ONDERZOEK VAN DE DULLE GRIET BOMBARDE IN GENT Door Marc Beyaert 1. Betekenis Hoewel het Groot Kanon deel uitmaakt van het vertrouwde Gentse straatbeeld en heel wat stadsgenoten bezorgd waren toen ze voor restauratie tijdelijk ver­ wijderd werd, was en is deze bombarde voor het grote publiek een volslagen onbe~ende. Zelfs eminente historici bleken van ons militair-technisch verle­ den vaak een foute voorstelling te hebben. Ze hebben deze met hun gezag­ hebbende publicaties generaties lang verder doorgegeven : had Henri Pirenne het, in een legende bij een foto van het Groot Kanon, niet over een gegoten donderbus van meer dan 6 m lang, die behalve met stenen, ook met ijzer­ schroot en glas werd geladen 1 ? Samen met een bepaalde antimilitaristische vooringenomenheid- nog versterkt sinds mei 1968 -, zorgde de onwetendheid op dit terrein voor een blijvende verwaarlozing van het militair-technisch patrimonium2. Geleidelijk groeide echter het besef dat het militaire gebeuren een zeer belangrijk aandeel had, niet enkel in de algemeen historische, maar vooral ook in de economische, sociale, technologische en zelfs filosofische evolutie. Over de volledige evolutie van de buskruitartillerie3 beschouwd - van haar prilste begin in Europa bij de aanvang van de 14e eeuw tot de grote innova­ ties halverwege de 19e eeuw - is het smeedijzeren Groot Kanon of de Dulle Griet, met haar to tale lengte4 van 5, 031 mm, haar actueel nettogewicht van 12.250 kg en haar «kaliber»S van 640 mm, de grootste vuurmond van wester­ se makelij, die uit deze lange periode bewaard is gebleven. De Russische giet- PIRENNE H., Geschiedenis van Belgie, dl.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletters CONTENTS NEW Sheet 129-1
    CONTENTS by ISSUE NEWSLETTER Newsletter No. 129 (April 2020) From the Editor Whittington, G Lots more on the 3.7”AA Gun Robins, Morgan, Machin, Parker Query: Guns to identify [at Swinemund post-WW2] Kurzawa, P Trophy guns in Lincoln Fyfe, A Whale hunting gun used like a swivel-gun Cholet, C More on the plough-gun (and other interesting ideas)(OSNL-126) Walton, S New RA Museum at Avon Camp, Netheravon Hatton, R Query: Is this a 2pdr? [Chapel Bay Fort] Morgan, R OS Board Meeting, February 2020: Minutes Hall, N List of OS Visits Grant, N 3.7” QF-AA Gun on a Canadian Ram tank chassis (WWII) Newsletter No. 128 (January 2020) Book for Sale: Artillery Survey in the First World War Gander, T From the Editor Whittington, G Big Cannon Project Reed, N Report: NAS/OS Joint Conference, November 2019 Whittington, G National Shell Filling Factory No.6, Chilwell Lyons, M Small ads in the OS Newsletter Morgan, R Query: Information on the rise and fall of Napalm Gladwell, M Musarra Cannon in Georgia [Sicilian, bronze, 1554] Brinck, N Query: MG34...or MG42? Morgan, R Query: 3.7in Gun in WWII [in the A39 Tortoise tank] Morgan, R Re: Artillery: Bastille Day 1917 postcard (OSNL-127) Gander, T Review: The Medieval Cannon, 1326-1494 Morgan, R OS AGM 2019: Minutes Hall, N Image: Halifax Bell Tower Memorial Plaque Whittington, G Newsletter No. 127 (October 2019) From the Editor Whittington, G OS AGM 2019 date NAS/OS Conference Schedule (Provisional) For sale: Flak 88 [in Spain] Martinez, J Re: Lockhart Leith's History of British Minefields (OSNL-126) Ewin, T Re:
    [Show full text]
  • Piotr Strzyż Artyleria W Działaniach Zbrojnych Pod Wieluniem I Bolesławcem Nad Prosną W Latach 1391-1396
    Piotr Strzyż Artyleria w działaniach zbrojnych pod Wieluniem i Bolesławcem nad Prosną w latach 1391-1396 Rocznik Wieluński 12, 89-106 2012 Rocznik Wieluński Tom 12 (2012) Piotr Strzyż (Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN Ośrodek Badań nad Dawnymi Technologiami Łódź) Artyleria W DZIAŁANIACH ZBROJNYCH POD WIELUNIEM I BOLESŁAWCEM NAD PROSNą W LATACH 1391–1396 Dla terenu Królestwa Polskiego pierwsza wzmianka o zastosowaniu artylerii pocho- dzi, jak wiadomo, z Kroniki Janka z Czarnkowa. W opisie oblężenia Pyzdr w 1383 r. za- notowano: lapidem aero de pixide1, czyli ze spiżowej puszki wystrzelono kamienny po- cisk. Przebił on bramę miejską zabijając stojącego za nią plebana Mikołaja z Biechowa. Ten incydent zapoczątkował nowy rozdział w historii polskich sił zbrojnych. Artyleria, a wkrótce i ręczna broń palna, pomimo swojej początkowej niedoskonałości, szybko zaczęła odgrywać znaczącą rolę w działaniach oblężniczych. Już w niespełna dekadę po wspomnianym pierwszym zastosowaniu, w trakcie wojny Władysława Jagiełły z księ- ciem Władysławem Opolczykiem o jego posiadłości (lata 1391–1396), szczególną uwa- gę zwrócono właśnie w stronę artylerii i za jej pomocą próbowano uzyskać decydujące rozstrzygnięcie, jako że działania zbrojne nie toczyły się w polu, a raczej pod murami obleganych miast i zamków. Władysław Opolczyk, już w okresie rządów Ludwika Wielkiego, odgrywał zna- czącą rolę w węgierskiej polityce, zarówno krajowej jak i zagranicznej, by w 1367 r. otrzymać tytuł palatyna Węgier. Po śmierci Kazimierza Wielkiego był orędownikiem przejęcia władzy w Polsce przez króla Ludwika. Po jego koronacji na króla Polski, w uznaniu zasług na tym polu, otrzymał w 1370 r. w lenno ziemię wieluńską (Wieluń, Bolesławiec, Wieruszów, Kępno) wraz z północno-zachodnią częścią ziemi krakow- skiej (Żarki, Mstów, Częstochowa, Kłobuck, Olsztyn, Bobolice i Krzepice), część ziemi sieradzkiej (z Brzeźnicą).
    [Show full text]
  • A Unique Example of Medieval Artillery (Against the Background of Development of Firearms in the Teutonic Order’S State in Prussia)
    STUDIA I MATERIAŁY – STUDIES AND MATERIALS Acta Militaria Mediaevalia IX Kraków – Rzeszów – Sanok 2013, s. 155-201 Janusz Stępiński Grzegorz Żabiński Piotr Strzyż THE LIGHT FIELD CANNON FROM KURZĘTNIK – A UNIQUE EXAMPLE OF MEDIEVAL ARTILLERY (AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF DEVELOPMENT OF FIREARMS IN THE TEUTONIC ORDER’S STATE IN PRUSSIA) Abstract: J. Stępiński, G. Żabiński, P. Strzyż, The light field cannon from Kurzętnik – a unique example of medieval artillery (against the background of development of firearms in the Teutonic Order’s state in Prussia), AMM IX: 155-201 The paper deals with the find of an early 15th c. light field cannon from the castle of Kurzętnik in the territory of the former state of the Teutonic Order in Prussia. The find is discussed against the background of development of firearms in the Order’s state, including gun types, organisation of manufacture, prices etc. Based on technological examinations, the cannon was cast of copper, which matches data on such guns from contemporary Teutonic records. Key words: Teutonic Order, Middle Ages, 14th-15th c., military, artillery, archaeometallurgy, copper guns Introduction cross the river, as both the castle and the fords’ The cannon in question (Fig. 1) was discovered defences were additionally reinforced by the Order. in 1941 during archaeological excavations in the This implies that the artillery at the castle may have ruins of the castle in Kurzętnik (then Kauernick) in been composed both of cannons belonging to the Western Prussia (now in north-eastern Poland). It chapter and the Order. After the battle of Grunwald was found in the castle’s cellar.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Medieval Wrought Iron Firearms from the Museum in Biecz1
    FASCICULI ARCHAEOLOGIAE HISTORICAE FASC. XXVI, PL ISSN 0860-0007 LESZEK KLIMEK, JANUSZ STĘPIŃSKI, PIOTR STRZYŻ, GRZEGORZ ŻABIŃSKI LATE MEDIEVAL WROUGHT IRON FIREARMS FROM THE MUSEUM IN BIECZ1 From1the very beginning of existence of firearms, there mould and with processing this clay. This stage lasted until were two competitive manufacturing techniques – casting 11 May but already during the casting the mould broke and and forging. These resulted from the use of two raw materi- the metal spilt into the ground. On the next day (12 May), als – copper and its alloys as well as iron. A good exam- the works were resumed and the process was completed ple of co-occurrence of weapons manufactured from these within a month. On 9 June the cannon was ready and it two raw materials are the earliest mentions of the use of underwent finishing works. Unfortunately, the barrel burst firearms in the territory of Poland. The first record comes in the course of firing tests on 7 July. Master gunners were from the Chronicle of Janko of Czarnków and concerns the not discouraged with this failure and they commenced their siege of Pyzdry in 1383. While describing this siege, there works again in Autumn, on 12 September. On 1 October is a mention of a stone projectile fired from a red brass gun a new mould was filled with alloy. Some complications (lapidem aero de pixide)2. Some years thereafter, in 1391 occurred again, but those were less significant than previ- it was recorded in municipal accounts of Kraków that the ously. In all probability, the mould suffered no major dam- town bought 6 cannons upon the request of King Władysław age, as after some days (on 6 October), the process was Jagiełło.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Traces of Use of Firearms During Sieges. Selected Examples from the Territory of Poland
    FASCICULI ARCHAEOLOGIAE HISTORICAE FASC. XXVIII, PL ISSN 0860-0007 Piotr Strzyż ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRACES OF USE OF FIREARMS DURING SIEGES. SELECTED EXAMPLES FROM THE TERRITORY OF POLAND Abstract: This paper is in attempt at correlating chronologically well-defined assemblages of projectiles and historical events which accompanied their deposition. In order for the relics to be of maximum use such an analysis, it is necessary for them to heave precisely defined find places and cultural context. These are discoveries related to well-datable military activities (sieges) and finds acquired in the course of examinations of masonry objects. We did a comparison with regard to military conflicts which are well-depicted in sources: Bolesławiec and Wieluń 1396, Puck 1464, Muszyna 1474 and Gniewoszów 1428. Keywords: firearms, medieval siege, Poland, hand held firearms One of components of military activities in the late which provided cause for a military conflict. The war was Middle Ages was a more and more widespread use of waged between the years 1391 and 13962. a new type of weapons – firearms. For the territory of Po- The main attack was made after September 15th, 1391. land, the first mention is related to the siege of Pyzdry in Polish troops gathered near Rabsztyn in Lesser Poland and 13831, and since then the new weapons appear more and attacked the castle in Olsztyn near Częstochowa, which more often on the pages of chronicles describing military they won after three days of siege. during further mili- activities. In this paper we will deal with finds which are tary proceedings the royal army seized Brzeźnica, Wieluń, related to the use of firearms during sieges.
    [Show full text]