DOCSLIB.ORG

02 Msc 1965 0100 Ocr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
02 Msc 1965 0100 Ocr EMERGENCY NUMBERS FIRE . CLEAR LAKE EMERGENCY (To Report Fires Only) ............................ 3211 ADMINISTRATIVE .............................................................. 4658 FIRE. ELLINGTON AFB .......................................................... 7229 SECURITY GUARD· CLEAR LAKE ........................................ 2691 MEDICAL EMERGENCY NUMBERS NORMAL DUTY HOURS DISPENSARY· CLEAR LAKE, BUILDING 8 MAJOR INJURIES, DISASTER ........................................ 3815 MINOR INJURIES, ILLNESSES ........................................ 4111 NASA AMBULANCE .......................................................... 4111 DISPENSARY ANNEX· ELLINGTON AFB, BUILDING 339 EMERGENCY ...................................................................... 7715 OTHER THAM NORMAL DUTY HOURS To reach the MEDICAL DUTY OFFICER or NASA AMBULANCE call the: TELECOMMUNICATIONS BRANCH DUTY OFFICER .. 3911 FIRE DEPARTMENT (Oxygen or Resuscitator) ............ 3211 THIS DIRECTORY IS GOVERNMENT PROPERTY AND IS PUBLISHED FOR NASA USE. IT WILL MOT BE DISTRIBUTED INDISCRIMINATELY, HOR TO NOH-NASA ACTIVITIES EXCEPT WHEN SUCH DISTRIBUTION CAM BE JUSTIFIED AS BEING BENEFICIAL TO NASA. MANNED SPACECRAFT CENTER TELEPHONE DIRECTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS General Information . • • • ii Long Distance Calls . iii Federal T elccommunicotions System (FTS) iii Leased Lines . iii Collstoothercities .......................... xi Definitions of Abbreviations . xii Site Mop . xiii Official MSC Routing Symbols . .. xiv Official Addresses . xxi Organizational Directory , . • . • . 1 Alphabetical Directory . .. 21 MSC - Houston . 21 MSC - Bethpoge . 93 Contractor Representatives . 94 Contractor Alphabetical Directory . 97 Closs ified Section . , ..... , . 109 TO DIAL You If Kemah Are NASA NASA NASA Houston Friendswood Dickinson FTS League City CI ear Lake Ellington Numbers Seabrook La Porte Located Operator Nassau Bay At NASA 87+ 9+ 9+ 8+ Ext. No. Ext. No. 0 Clear Lake 0 Listed No. Listed No. Listed No. Listed No, NASA 3+ 387+ 9+ 9+ 38+ Ext. No. 30 30 El I ington Ext. No. Listed No. Listed No. Listed No. Listed No. Friendswood Consult Consult Consult Consult Kemah HU3-+ HU3-+ Not Telephone Telephone Telephone Telephone Nassau Bay HU3-0123 Ext. Ext. Authorized Company Company Company Company League City D 1rectory Directory Directory Directory Seabrook Consult Consult Consult Consult Not Telephone Telephone Telephone Telephone Dickinson 932-4534 932-4534 932-4534 Authorized Company Company Company Company Directory Directory Directory Directory Consult Consult Consult Consult Not Telephone Telephone Telephone Telephone La Porte 421-0990 421-0990 421-0990 Authorized Company Company Company Company Directory Directory Directory D ireqtory HOW TO TRANSFER CALLS AT NASA-CENTRX 1. Depress switch hook one time to count of two. 2. T cl I sw!,d. opr. new station to which call is to be transferred. SWITCHBOARD HOURS OF OPERATION Monday - Friday 7:30 am - 8:00 pm Dial 'Operator' 8:00 pm - 7:30 om Dial 3911 or 3111 Saturday 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Dial 'Operator' 5:00 pm - Monday - 7:30 am Dial 3911 or3lll Chief Operator Dial 3885 OPERATION OF SWITCHBOARDS BY OTHER THAN AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. TELEPHONE SECURITY The telephone i..s....rul1.a secure means of communication. Do not discuss classified material over the telephone. LOCAL OUTSIDE CALLS - For Official Use Only To call a number in the Houston Exchange from the MSC dial system, dial '9', wait for the dial tone, and then dial the number. INTEROFFICE CALLS - See inside front cover. TRANSFERRING CALLS Direct in-dial cal Is can be transferred to another extension by depressing the button in the telephone receiver cradle ONE I IMF The MSC operator wi 11 transfer the call. Direct out-dial or interoffice calls cannot be transferred. In this instance it will be necessary to hang up and re-dial the desired extension or number. CONFERENCE CALLS Conference calls on incoming and outgoing calls will be established by the MSC operator. a. Direct In-Dial Calls - Flash the operator and tell her the extension number of other people you want on the I ine. b. Out-Going or Interoffice Calls - Dial the operator and tell her the extension and/or telephone numbers of the people you want on the I ine. CHANGES IN TELEPHONE SERVICE OR EQUIPMENT Requests for installation or modification of telephone equipment will be submitted on MSC Form 516 to Office Services Division, Telecommunications Branch. ATTACHMENTS TO TELEPHONES The telephone company furnishes oil equipment necessary to provide telephone service. In the interests of safety and good service, no equipment, apparatus or device not furnished by the telephone co"1pany may be attached to, or used or con­ nected with its foci I ities, except as otherwise provided in the telephone company's tariffs. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL ANY PERSONNEL MOVE, ADD ADDI­ TIONAL EQUIPMENT, ALTER, OR REPAIR A TELEPHONE OR ITS ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. TELEPHONE REPAIR SERVICE Call extension 3885. VISITORS' CALLS Visitors may place long distance Collect calls with the MSC operators. If they want to pay for the call, they must use a pay station. ii CHANGES IN TELEPHONE DIRECTORY LISTING Any changes or corrections in the telephone directory listings should be submitted on MSC Form 149 to Office Services Division, TelecommL·nications Branch. LONG DISTANCE CALLS - For Official Use Only em ICY REGARDING OFFICIAi I ONG DISTANCE CALLS It is essential that official calls be restricted to the conduct of official business of such urgency that no other means of communication will suffice. When telephone calls to other cities are necessary every effort must be made to utilize the NASA leased lines and/or the FTS rather than cocr,mercial cables. l. LEASED LINES - The following leased lines are available and should be uti Ii zed to the fu 11 est extent. TO TERMINATION POINT DIAL Bethpage, N. Y. RASPO 3776 Cape Kennedy, Fla. Florida Operations Manager 2226 Cape Kennedy, Fla. Apollo AMR Test Office 2227 Cape Kennedy, Flo. Switchboard (Ask for extension) 3246 Downey, Cal if. NAA Switchboard (Ask for extension) 4985 Downey, Cal if. RASPO 3277 Downey, Ca I if. RASPO - Engineering Division 3276 Huntsvi I le, Ala. Redstone Arsenal Switchboard (Ask for extension) 3278 White Sands, N. M. PSDF Dial 84 plus Ext. 2. FEDERAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM - In order to receive full benefit of the FTS, it is essential that the following instructions be followed when making calls. To avoid unnecessary calls to the FTS operator for informa­ tion, each user should maintain a comprehensive list of frequently called numbers. HQW ID IISE To reach a telephone in a distant city - a. Check to see if the City you are calling is listed. b. Dial the FTS access code. '87' from Clear Lake - '387' from Ellington. c. Wait for second dial tone, then dial the area code, and continue dialing the number as listed. d. It will be necessary to reach the FTS operator in the distant city for informa­ tion, assistance or to call non-Government numbers. FTS operator numbers are listed below for your convenience. To call Government agencies served by the FTS - use the FTS Telephone Users Guide dated July 1964. If the party you are calling is not available and you want to be called back, leave your name, area code, and telephone number. Do not give your access code. IQ REPORT TRQI !RI E. Dial your MSC operator and inform her of your telephone trouble. iii THE EDI I OWING CITIES ARE AVAIi ARI E ON THE EIS NETWORK CITY AREA CODE FTS OPERA TOR Aberdeen, S. Dok. 605 225-0250 Aiken, S. C. 803 253-8371 Akron, Ohio 216 535-1851 Albany, Calif. 415 556-9000 Albany, Ga. 912 226-1761 Albany, N. Y. 518 472-4411 Albany, Oreg. 503 926-5811 Albuquerque, N. Mex. 505 247-0311 Alexandria, La. 318 445-6511 Alexandria, Va. (See Washington, D. C.) Allentown, Pa. 215 597-3311 Altoona, Pa. 814 944-4501 Amari Ilo, Tex. 806 376-5151 Ames, Iowa 515 232-0011 Ann Arbor, Mich. 313 663-8541 Anniston, Ala. 205 325-3011 Appleton, Wisc. 414 272-8600 Argonne, Ill. (AEC Only) 312 739-7711 Arlington, Va. (See Washington, D. C.) Ashevi I le, N. C 704 254-0961 Athens, Ga. 404 548-5641 Atlanta, Ga. 404 526-0111 Atlantic City, N. J. 609 344-4011 Auburn, Ala. 205 263-7521 Auburn, N. Y.. 315 473-3350 Auburn, Wash. 206 833-6500 Augusta, Maine 207 622-6171 Austin, Texas 512 476-6411 Bakersfield, Cal if. 805 963-3611 Baltimore, Md. 301 752-8460 Bangor, Maine 207 942-8271 Baton Rouge, La. 504 348-7181 Battle Creek, Mich. 616 962-6511 Bay St. Louis, Miss. (NASA Only) 601 467-7511 Beaumont, Tex. 713 835-3911 Bellingham, Wash. 206 734-5454 Beltsville, Md. (See Washington, D. C.) Berkeley, Cal if. 415 841-5121 Bethesda, Md. (See Washington, D. C.) Bethpage, N. Y. (NASA-Grumman Aircraft Only) 516 575-0574 Bi 11 ings, Mont. 406 245-6623 Biloxi, Miss. 601 354-3881 Binghamton, N. Y. 607 772-0150 Birmingham, Ala. 205 325-3011 Bismarck, N. Dok. 701 255-4011 Bohemia, N. Y. (MacArthur Airport (FAA Only)) 516 588-1000 Boise, Idaho 208 342-2711 Boston, Mass. 617 223-2100 Boulder, Colo. 303 442-2161 Boulder City, Nev. (Bureau of Reclamation Only) 702 293-2161 Bridgeport, Conn. 203 367-3681 Brockton, Mass. 617 583-4500 Brookhaven, N. Y. (AEC Only) 516 924-6262 Brooklyn, N. Y. (See New York, N. Y. ) Brownsville, Tex. 512 225-5511 iv CITY AREA CODE FTS OPERATOR Bruceton, Po. (Bureau of Mines Only) 412 892-2400 Buffalo, N. Y. 716 842-3311 Burlingame, Calif. (See Son Francisco, Calif.) Burlington, Iowa 319 366-2011 Burlington, Vt. 802 862-6501 Butler, Po. 412 287-4781 Butte, Mont. 406 442-9040 Cambridge, Mass. 617 223-2100 Camden, N. J. 609 963-2541 Canoga Pork, Calif. (AEC Only) 213 341-1120 Canton, Ohio 216 455-8971 Cosper, Wyo. 307 265-3330 Cedar Rapids, Iowa 319 366-2011 Champaign, 111. 217 525-4011 Charleston, S. C. 803 253-8371 Charleston, W. Vo. 304 343-6181 Charlotte, N. C. 704 372-0711 Chorlottesvi I le, Vo. 703 296-5171 Chattanooga, Tenn. 615 266-3151 Cheyenne, Wyo.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mr. Harold Finger NETS-2011 Honorary General Chair
    Mr. Harold Finger NETS-2011 Honorary General Chair Harold B. Finger has been working as an independent consultant since his retirement in May 1991 from the U.S. Council for Energy Awareness, where he served as President and CEO since January 1983. He is consulting in energy policy and programs, space systems and programs, urban development and housing issues, and government management working with government, industry, and non- profit organizations. Mr. Finger received a BS Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the City College of New York in 1944 and an MS in Aeronautical Engineering from the Case Institute of Technology in 1950. In 1957-1958, he also had special training in Nuclear Engineering at NASA’s predecessor, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) Lewis Flight Propulsion Laboratory in Cleveland, Ohio. After graduating from the City College in 1944, Mr. Finger joined the NACA as an Aeronautical Research Scientist responsible for aircraft engine and compressor and turbine research. He held increasingly responsible positions and in October 1958, when the National Aeronautics and Space Administration was established, he was asked to come to Washington to lead NASA’s space power and nuclear energy programs. From 1960-67, he managed the newly established Space Nuclear Propulsion Office, a joint office of the Atomic Energy Commission and NASA, responsible for nuclear rocket propulsion development while also serving as Director of NASA’s Space Power and Nuclear Systems. (He’ll be discussing the accomplishments of those programs in providing a capability for deep space exploration in the opening session of the 2011 NETS Program.) In 1965, he was also appointed Director of the AEC’s Space Nuclear Systems Division including responsibility for radioisotope and reactor power systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Housing
    Joint Center for Housing Studies Harvard University History Lessons for Today’s Housing Policy The Political Processes of Making Low-Income Housing Policy Alexander von Hoffman August 2012 Wl2-5 The research for this paper was conducted with the support of the Rockefeller Foundation. © by Alexander von Hoffman. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Any opinions expressed are those of the author and not those of the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University or of any of the persons or organizations providing support to the Joint Center for Housing Studies. This is a preprint of an article whose final and definitive form has been published in Housing Policy Debate © 2012 copyright Taylor & Francis: Table of Contents I. Introduction………………………….………………………………...............1 II. Housing Policy in the Great Economic Crisis………………………...............2 III. The Postwar Housing Crisis…………………………………………………..10 IV. Housing Remedies for the Urban Crisis………………………………………17 V. Policy Crisis and the Long Winding Road to a New Approach………………27 VI. Some Lessons from History for Promoting a New Rental Housing Policy.….41 I. INTRODUCTION History offers valuable lessons to policy makers. Among other lessons, it teaches us the reasons that the government adopted the programs that constitute the current housing policy landscape. The political strategies that succeeded in the past illuminate the possibilities for winning approval for and enacting new policies today. In recent American history, four crises related to housing led the United States government to initiate large-scale housing programs for low-and moderate-income Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear & Emerging Technologies for Space (NETS-2011)
    Program and Abstract Book Nuclear & Emerging Technologies for Space (NETS-2011) February 7-10, 2011 Albuquerque, New Mexico Sponsored by The American Nuclear Society (Trinity Section and Aerospace Nuclear Science and Technology Division) and The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics About the Meeting The 2011 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space (NETS-2011) meeting is the first stand-alone topical meeting organized by the Aerospace Nuclear Science and Technology Division (ANSTD), a professional division of the American Nuclear Society (ANS). Sponsored by the ANSTD, the ANS Trinity Section, and co-sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), NETS-2011 is the premier conference covering advanced power and propulsion systems for landed and in-space applications in 2011. The conference hosts three plenary sessions, invited panels, and numerous technical sessions organized into five technical track areas: [1] Missions and Architectures [2] Fission Power and Propulsion [3] Radioisotope Power Systems [4] Nuclear Thermal Propulsion [5] Advanced Concepts With authors hailing from universities, national laboratories, NASA facilities and industry, NETS-2011 will provide an excellent communications network and forum for information exchange. The unique NETS venue attracts papers and presentations from a wide range of experiences and expertise. NETS attendees range from engineers designing space power and propulsion systems, to those completing mission planning and analysis for proposed space missions and scientists who are designing payloads for those missions. NETS-2011 will allow nuclear professionals to learn about missions that require high power or advanced propulsion systems – and, conversely, it will allow mission designers opportunity to learn more about what advanced power and propulsion systems are available or could be developed to meet the needs of those missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Ground Test History the Rover/NERVA Program
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140008805 2019-08-31T20:21:52+00:00Z Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Ground Test History The Rover/NERVA Program Harold P. Gerrish Jr NASA Marshall Space Flight Center February 25, 2014 1 Agenda • Rover/NERVA Program • Nuclear Rocket Development Station • Rover/NERVA Engine Ground Tests • Final Rover/NERVA Engine Designs 2 How Did Nuclear Propulsion Start? • Many nuclear programs were under way in the early 1950’s • The Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) was before Department Of Energy (DOE) • 1955 AEC assigned Lawrence Livermore labs Project Pluto (code name Tory) for nuclear ramjets and Los Alamos Project Rover for nuclear rockets • Project Orion (external thermonuclear blast push propulsion) was developed in parallel • The Nevada test site was selected in 1956 since it was close to both LLNL and LANL. Facility Construction began in 1957. [1] Rover Orion Pluto-Tory IIC 3 Nuclear Rocket Program Organization [2] ----Line Authority ----Program Direction August 31, 1960 the AEC-NASA office was formed and Harold Finger named Director 4 Early Program Actions Rover/NERVA [2] NERVA-Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Application 5 Project Rover/NERVA Funding [1] The total would be $7.6B in FY13 6 Kennedy Strongly Supports NTP President John F. Kennedy Special Address to Congress On The Importance of Space, 25 May 1961 “… I therefore ask the Congress, above and beyond the increases I have earlier requested for space activities, to provide the funds which are needed to meet the following national goals: “First, I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth… “Secondly … accelerate development of the Rover nuclear rocket.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Power in Space, Dr
    ,:,,, .,..., ,+ . :, DOE/NE/32117-Hl ,.., ,,,., ‘..’ . ..1.1 .3 ,:.. .;. ,. ,7.. ./. .;, Atomic Power ,., In Space ,,,.,. .,,,’., ; ,?, ,,... A History ,.,,, .,, ~,,;,,, ‘, ,,r .,.v . ,’*,; : ,- ,,,,,. , ,;..,. ,,;-,,,. ‘/., - :., ,, ~,/, ... , March 1987 ,’ .,’ J ,. ,1, , ,.,’ ,.,’.., ‘r, . DOE/NE/32117--Hl DE87 010618 ., . Prepared by: ,; Planning G Human Systems, Inc. Washington, DC $3 Under Contract No. DE-AC01;NE32117 ,: ,. ,,., Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy ,. : Deputy Assistant Secretary for Reactor Systems ,,, ,, Development and Technology .,,, Washington, DC 20545 ., MASTER f, .;. DISTRIBUTIONOf THIS @3WMfi4T IS UiJLirfilTED ,,, 9-J ., ,’ ..,;,. .$, . ,!, , (: ,.” CONTENTS .,’ . ~, ,: Forward ... ‘ Preface iv Chapter I Introduction . .*..*.*.. **.*..*.. 1 Chapter 11 The Beginnings ● *****O**. ● *O***.**. ● *.**. 4 .,, ! -, ,, .J, ,,, , ‘:., Chapter 111 .;, , .; ., ,. 1: Recognition of Potential . 14 , -:’ ,., ,,, .;. .,‘. Chapter IV ,,.- .~, ,, .,:’ Golden Days atthe AEC... .. 28 ,../ ,, ,,,, : .,,,. Chapter V , .- ,, “ ., ,! : ,’ Momentum from the Lunar Race . ...56 i .’:, .,’ ,., , ,,<,, Cliapter VI ,,>,;. i“,,’, ,!.,, A Maturing Program . 72 .;,, . ,, )., ,: Chapter VII ,,,,.. ,.,.-, ,,,,....:, Persistence Amid Change . 83 ‘f. , ., .(’ ,: Chapter VIII .,,. .. .,- .> Past Lessons and Future Challenges . 99 ,, ..- ./:,. ,-,.. ,,,.. ,,,., ,! Foreword FOREWORD On December 8, 1953 President Dwight D. Eisenhower, in his famous “Atoms-for-Peace” address, proposed that the United Nations
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on Information Sources
    106 BIBLIOGRAPHY A Note on Information Sources Various types of materials were used in preparing this history. At the outset, an extensive computer search of the Department of Energy (DOE) library, including the data base at the Oak Ridge Laboratory, revealed that the type of technical reports there would not be helpful in developing this history. Pri­ marily, three other sources of information were relied upon: materials from DOE Archives, which were identified and assembled by Roger Anders of DOE's History Division; the data bases of the Library of Congress, which led to a review of newspapers, periodicals, technical journals, and books; and inter­ views. Three classes of information were used: technical events and developments, institutional developments, and related events in the milieu. The five categories of materials used are discussed below. Printed reports and government documents were used to identify particular facts about the RTGs and the program. Some of the materials provided relevant facts covering broad time periods; other sources pinpointed narrow time periods and revealed program status at a time, or presented important decisions or statements relevant to the program. A few of the materials focused on particular aspects of the program. Books and pamphlets provided a breadth and depth of understanding. Several stand out for an understanding of the technology and the broad and changing issues of the time period covered: the historical documents about the AEC, ERDA, and the DOE, and the energy chronology produced by the history staff of DOE (Buck, Dean, and Holl) were invaluable in succinctly presenting relevant events in the institutional environment.
    [Show full text]
  • There Are Only Three Possible Sources of Energy Which Can Be Used to Generate Electricity in Space – Chemical, Nuclear, Or Solar
    “ There are only three possible sources of energy which can be used to generate electricity in space – chemical, nuclear, or solar. Each energy source, . has its own intrinsic characteristics, and their differences determine which source is uniquely the best for a specific mission.” Systems for Nuclear Auxiliary Power…A Report by the Commission – 1964 viii The Early Years Space Nuclear Power 1 Systems Take Flight nly a few years separate the operation of mankind’s first nuclear reactor at the University of Chicago in 19421 and the first U.S. research on the use of nuclear power in space. Shortly after the Oend of World War II, control of atomic energy was transferred from military to civilian hands when Congress enacted the Atomic Energy Act of 1946.2 e Act created the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), which began operation on January 1, 1947. Although responsibility for atomic energy development was now under the new civilian agency, its development continued to remain tied to military purposes. By the late 1940s and early 1950s, studies by the AEC and the Department of Defense (DoD) began to show that the energy generated from the decay of radioisotopes and the process of nuclear fission held much promise for uses other than atomic weapons. Performed against the backdrop of the early days of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, in which each country sought military and technological prowess over the other, those studies envisioned radioisotope and reactor power for military reconnaissance satellites and a nuclear reactor propulsion system for intercontinental ballistic missiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Momentum from the Lunar Race
    56 Chapter V Momentum from the Lunar Race Memorable Achievements in Tumultuous Years harp contrasts in events marked the last half of the decade of the 1960s. Fantastic space achievements—the astronauts of Apollo 8 orbited the Moon and sent back spectacular pictures,' lunar landings tested many assumptions, the near-disaster of Apollo 13 demonstrated the effectiveness of fall-back support systems—shared the spotlight with recurring national tragedies and growing civil unrest. The RTG program, although it gathered momentum from its association with space triumphs, could not remain completely unaffected by the civil strife and the growing dissension over the nation's entanglements in the war in Vietnam. The war began to dominate not only coverage in the print media and television, but also the allocation of federal funding. The space program suffered as a result. In 1966 AuiatJon Week, commenting on yet another lull in the fighting in Vietnam, saw it as a pause "that hopefully might lead to meaningful negotiations but more likely [it] is simply a prelude to greater escalation of that conflict."^ This proved to be the case, and the government's apportionment of funds reflected a shift in priorities. NASA budgets began a steady decline even as technical developments, although slowed by the Apollo fire at Cape Kennedy in January 1967, progressed towards a manned lunar landing. AEC budgets for space nuclear applications came under ever closer scrutiny as well. Eventually, it was the more highly touted nuclear propulsion effort, followed by the space power reactor program, that felt the budget crunch most strongly.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa's Nuclear Frontier
    iv NASA’s Nuclear Frontier: The Plum Brook Reactor Facility NASA’s Nuclear Frontier The Plum Brook Reactor Facility, 1941—2002 by Mark D. Bowles and Robert S. Arrighi NASA History Division Office of External Relations NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546 Monographs in Aerospace History Series Number 33 August 2004 Introduction Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bowles, Mark D. NASA’s Nuclear Frontier: the Plum Brook Reactor Facility / Mark D. Bowles and Robert S. Arrighi. p. cm. — (Monographs in aerospace history; no. 33) (NASA SP ; 2004-4533) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. NASA Glenn Research Center. Plum Brook Station—History. 2. Nuclear energy—Research—United States— History. 3. Nuclear reactors—Ohio—Sandusky—Experiments. I. Arrighi, Robert S., 1969- II. Title. III. Series. IV. NASA SP ; 4533. QC786.43.U5B68 2003 621.48’3’0977122—dc22 2003044298 Image 1 (cover): Plum Brook reactor control room as engineers prepare to “take it critical” for the first time in 1961. (NASA C1961–55813) NASA’s Nuclear Frontier: The Plum Brook Reactor Facility Contents List of Images ................................................................................................................................. v Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Obtaining the Land ....................................................................................................................... 9 The Dream of a Flying Reactor
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Gary Bleeker 16
    NASA Conference Publication 10116 NuclearPropulsion TechnicalInterchange Meeting Volume II Proceedings of a meeting held at NASA Lewis Research Center Plum Brook Station Sandusky, OH October 20-23, 1992 (NASA-CP-IOIIG-Vo|-2) NUCLEAR N93-26951 m PROPULSION TECHNICAL INTERCHANGE --THRU-- MEETING, VOLUME 2 (NASA) 581 p N93-26990 Unclas N/_A G3/20 0157840 m NASA Conference Publication 10116 NuclearPropulsionTechnical Interchange Meeting VolumeII Proceedings of a meeting sponsored and hosted by NASA Lewis Research Center Plum Brook Station October 20-23, 1992 NI_A National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Management Scientific and Technical Information Program 1993 NUCLEAR PROPULSION TECHNICAL INTERCHANGE MEETING Table of Contents Volume I Title of Presentation Au or Preface vi INTRODUCTION Mars Exploration Program Dwayne Weary 2 Requirements for Space Nuclear Electric Propulsion Douglas Stetson 10 DoD Requirements for Space Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Gary Bleeker 16 EXEcITrlVE SI TMMARY NASA Program Overview Thomas J. Miller 21 Overview of DOE Space Nuclear Propulsion Programs Alan Newhouse 24 DoD Space Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (SNTP) Program c,ary Bleem 34 NUCLEAR THERMAL PROPULSION SYSTEM CONCEPTS Systems Overview Robert Corban 42 Requirements/Control Management Red Robbins 48 Public Acceptance Harold Finger 53 ROVERJNERVA-Derived Near-Term Nuclear Propulsion Dick Johnson 67 Advanced Propulsion Engine Assessment Based on Cermet Reactor Randy Parsley 150 NTRE Exlended Life Feasibility Assessment (Particle-Bed/aS) Mel Mcllwain
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspectives: the Role of the NASA Lewis Research Center in the National Space Nuclear Power Programs
    ZI!I_' NASA Technical Memorandum 105196 ..... AIAA-91-3462 Historical Perspectives: The Role of the NASA Lewis Research Center in the National Space Nuclear Power Programs H.S. Bloomfield and R.J. Sovie Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio _iii__ Prepared for the Conference on Advanced Space Exploration initiative Technologies cosponsored by the AIAA, NASA, and OAI Cleveland, Ohio, September 4-6, 1991 ,r_i_, _-_ -,, HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES: THE ROLE OF THE NASA LEWIS RESEARCH CENTER IN THE NATIONAL SPACE NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMS H.S. Bloomfield & R.J. Sovie NASA Lewis Research Center Abstract emphasis of NACA to the space emphasis of NASA. This transition was hastened by the Soviet launch of Sputnik in NASA Lewis Research Center's role in space nuclear October 1957, which changed forever the nation's outlook on power dates back prior to the establishment of NASA by an space. Act of Congress in October 1958 and even before the launch of the first man-made satellite (Sputnik} in 1957. As early as NASA Lewis' current role and involvement in space 1945, as an outgrowth of turbojet propulsion research, Lewis power and propulsion is an outgrowth of it's early commit- initiated work in rocket propellants and engines and by 1949 ment to advanced research and development. A typical ex- recognized the potential of rocket powered missiles for mili- ample of this commitment in the propulsion arena was the tary weapons and space missions. By the mid-1950's, Lewis pioneering development of liquid hydrogen rocket fuel initia- researchers were conducting feasibility studies of nuclear ted at Lewis in 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • Humans to Mars
    Humans to Mars Fifty Years of Mission Planning, 1950—2000 David S. F. Portree NASA History Division Office of Policy and Plans NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546 Monographs in Aerospace History #21 February 2001 NASA SP-2001-4521 NASA SP-2000-4521 Humans to Mars Fifty Years of Mission Planning, 1950–2000 by David S. F. Portree NASA History Division Office of Policy and Plans NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546 Monographs in Aerospace History Series Number 21 February 2001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Portree, David S. F. Humans to Mars: fifty years of mission planning, 1950–2000/by David S. F. Portree. p. cm.–(Monographs in aerospace history; no. 21) (NASA publication SP) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Space flight to Mars–Planning. 2. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. I. Title. II. Series. III. NASA SP ; no. 4521. TL799.M3 P67 2000 629.45’53–dc21 00—062218 Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................v Preface ..............................................................................................................................................................vii Chapter 1: On the Grand Scale ............................................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Earliest NASA Concepts......................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]