Dynamics of Arcades in the Netherlands: Developments in Legislation, Policy, and Practice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dynamics of Arcades in the Netherlands: Developments in Legislation, Policy, and Practice GAMING LAW REVIEW AND ECONOMICS Volume 14, Number 10, 2010 ©Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/glre.2010.141005 Dynamics of Arcades in the Netherlands: Developments in Legislation, Policy, and Practice Ad Schreijenberg and Bob van Waveren INCE 1986, THE DUTCH gambling policy, as laid investments in arcades; plans for new arcades have Sdown in the Dutch Gambling Act (WOK), en- sometimes been called off. ables the operation of gambling machines and ar- cades.1 The current gambling policy is based on the following keynotes: meeting the needs of the gen- LEGAL FRAMEWORK eral public, protection of vulnerable groups, prof- itable operation, and good enforcement opportuni- The Dutch Gambling Act, of 31 December 1964, ties. These keynotes are in line with the Dutch provides for a general ban on offering gambling polder model tradition: the interests of all parties games, unless a license has been granted. Skill ma- have been taken into consideration in the realization chines, which are gaming machines whose game re- of this policy. sults lead exclusively to extended game play or free Part of the policy—for example, the location of bonus games and whose playing success depends on arcades and the gambling addiction prevention pol- insight and skills, were permitted. Gambling ma- icy—is regulated locally instead of nationally. It is chines, described by the law as “gaming machines partly because of this that there is no clear overview which are not skill machines” were prohibited at the of the developments in the arcades industry at the time. In 1986, the WOK was amended to include a national level. Observing that arcades make up an separate provision for gaming machines, and pay- important part of the gambling industry—including out gambling machines were legalized under strict the corresponding addiction risks—the Netherlands conditions. In 2000, the most recent amendment of gaming control board ordered an investigative study the WOK concerning gaming machines was on the developments of the industry.2 This study adopted, which included the Gaming Machines De- shows that the arcade industry has further developed cision 2000 and the Gaming Machines Regulation itself in both a quantitative and a qualitative sense. 2000. The Gaming Machines Regulation 2000 stip- Due to scaling-up and upgrading, arcades more and ulates in particular the (technical) requirements with more resemble the casinos operated by the central regard to gaming machines. government. Over a decade, the number of opera- The explanation to the amendment of the law tors has halved, and different location choices are states that some keynotes carry more weight than being made. Compared to 2006, gross game pro- others. In particular, the protection of the player and ceeds have decreased. This results in a decrease in the prevention of—and fight against—problem 1 For readers unfamiliar with Dutch arcades, they are defined— and differentiated from casinos—in section 2, Concepts and Ad Schreijenberg and Bob van Waveren are researchers/advi- Context. sors at Regioplan Policy Research in Amsterdam (The Nether- 2 A. SCHREIJENBERG AND R.C. VAN WAVEREN, SPEELAUTO- lands). Translation was provided by Juliëtte van Dijk. The au- MATENHALLEN. EEN ONDERZOEK NAAR DE ONTWIKKELING VAN thors would like to thank Ger Homburg (Regioplan) and Peter SPEELAUTOMATENHALLEN IN NEDERLAND [ARCADES: STUDY ON Geertsen (Netherlands gaming control board) for their valuable THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARCADES IN THE NETHERLANDS] (Regio- comments. plan: Amsterdam 2009). 749 750 VAN WAVEREN AND SCHREIJENBERG gambling and gambling addiction played an impor- palities also provide a municipal operator’s license. tant part in this amendment of the law.3 This is also Normally, this license includes data on the managers emphasized in the Policy Letter Gaming Machines (including Certificates of Good Conduct of the op- of the Dutch Ministry of Justice. In this document, erators), the opening hours, and the minimum age the main objective of the gaming policy is described of the visitors. as follows: “to regulate and control gambling games, with special attention for the prevention of gambling addiction, the protection of consumers and the fight CONCEPTS AND CONTEXT against illegality and crime.”4 The main conse- quences for arcades of the amendment of 2000 were Arcades an increase in the lower age limit for patrons from Arcades are public places equipped with gaming sixteen to eighteen years of age, the introduction of 6 5 machines. A municipality in which an arcade has the legal evidence of gambling problem expertise, been established should determine the operation of and the introduction of gaming machines which of- the arcade by order. In this local act, the munici- fer space to more than one player, the so-called mul- pality can stipulate the number and kinds of gam- tiplayer machines. ing machines. The municipality also issues opera- Since the amendment of the Gambling Act in 1986, tor’s licenses for arcades. the power to decide on the number of arcades and With regard to arcades, a minimum customer age their locations was decentralized to the Dutch munic- of 18 years applies. Since 2000, arcades are required ipalities. Dutch municipalities that do not want ar- to have an entry control system. However, age cades can prevent their establishment by refraining checks are not necessary in arcades which have only from implementing a local act concerning arcades. skill machines or in which the spaces with gambling Municipalities that want to allow arcades within their machines are strictly separated from those with skill boundaries can specify the precise number of arcades, machines. In the latter cases, an age check is re- the locations where they may be established, and the quired only at the part of the arcade in which gam- number of gaming machines per arcade. bling machines are situated. To operate an arcade in the Netherlands, two li- censes are required: one license issued by the cen- Gaming machines tral government and one municipal license. These licenses can be described as follows: As mentioned above, a distinction is made be- tween skill machines and gambling machines. A • An operator’s license. This license regulates skill machine is “a gaming machine whose game re- who is allowed to operate gaming machines. sults may exclusively lead to extended game play Applicants need to apply for the license at or free bonus games and whose process, even after Verispect, the supervising organization, and it it has been put into action, can be influenced by the is issued by the Dutch Ministry of Justice. Each player. In addition, it should entirely or almost en- year, Verispect visits all the operators and checks their licenses, their accounts, and their workplace or service contract. 3 Dutch Lower Chamber documents II, meeting year • A municipal existence license. This license reg- 1997–1998, no 3. Amendment of the Dutch Gambling Act ulates where gaming machines may be placed. (gaming machines). Applicants need to apply for the license with 4 Dutch Lower Chamber documents II, meeting year 2004–2005, 24557, no 54. Letter of the Dutch minister of Jus- the local authorities and it is issued by the tice concerning gambling games. mayor. The license includes a statement on the 5 The legal evidence of gambling problem expertise is a piece number of machines (and in some cases, the re- of evidence which can be obtained by following a training course at one of the addiction treatment providers in the Nether- lation or proportion between gambling ma- lands. chines and skill machines). The license also in- 6 According to Article 30 of the Dutch Gambling Act, a gam- cludes data on the location of the arcade, the ing machine is: “an appliance, equipped to play games, which license owner, and the managers. consists of a mechanical, electrical or electronic process that can be put into action by the player, and whose result may lead to the indirect or direct payment of prizes or bonuses, includ- In addition to the existence license, some munici- ing the right to free bonus games.” ARCADES IN THE NETHERLANDS 751 tirely depend on the player’s insight and skills re- them has increased, while the number of skill ma- garding the means offered whether and to what de- chines has decreased. gree the duration of the game is extended or the right In order to put the development of the arcades in- to free bonus games is granted.”7 A gambling ma- dustry in perspective, it is interesting to compare it chine is described as “a gaming machine which is with the development of Holland Casino in the same not a skill machine.”8 In the case of gambling ma- period. Contrary to the number of arcades, the num- chines, the outcome of the game depends on chance, ber of Holland Casino establishments has increased and the player hopes to receive more money than over the years. Moreover, the number of gaming ma- the amount put into the machine. chines in Holland Casino establishments increased by more than 3,000 between 2001 and 2008. In Casinos versus arcades 2001, the casinos were equipped with 4,331 gam- ing machines; in 2008, this number had increased Holland Casino, which is owned by the Dutch to 7,385. This increase, as both an absolute num- government, offers its visitors both classical casino ber (3,054) and as a percentage (seventy percent, games (poker, roulette, blackjack) and (increas- or 70%), is significantly larger than the increase in ingly) gaming machines. Because of this, the dif- the number of gaming machines in arcades. (How- ference between Holland Casino and privately ever, it must be noted that in the Holland Casino es- owned arcades seems small, in as much as the ar- tablishments, it is the number of player’s seats cades also offer a mix of casino games and gaming which is counted, and not the number of actual ma- machines.
Recommended publications
  • Gambling 2017 3Rd Edition
    w ICLG The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Gambling 2017 3rd Edition A practical cross-border insight into gambling law Published by Global Legal Group, with contributions from: Arthur Cox Jones Walker LLP Brandl & Talos Attorneys at law Khaitan & Co Carallian Melchers Law Firm Cuatrecasas, Gonçalves Pereira Miller Thomson LLP DLA Piper UK LLP MME Legal | Tax | Compliance Gaming Legal Group Montgomery & Associados Hassans International Law Firm Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen Herzog Fox & Neeman Law Office Portilla, Ruy-Díaz y Aguilar, S.C. Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP Rato, Ling, Lei & Cortés – Advogados Horten Law Firm Sbordoni & Partners HWL Ebsworth Lawyers Sirius Legal International Masters of Gaming Law The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Gambling 2017 Editorial Chapter: 1 Shaping the Future of Gaming Law – Michael Zatezalo & Jamie Nettleton, International Masters of Gaming Law 1 General Chapters: 2 2016: Post-Brexit Upheaval and Raising the Compliance Bar – Hilary Stewart-Jones, Contributing Editor DLA Piper UK LLP 3 Hilary Stewart-Jones, DLA Piper UK LLP 3 Update on Fantasy Sports Contests in the United States – Changes Over the Past Year and What Sales Director May be Ahead in the Future – Mark Hichar, Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP 6 Florjan Osmani Account Directors Oliver Smith, Rory Smith Country Question and Answer Chapters: Sales Support Manager 4 Australia HWL Ebsworth Lawyers: Anthony Seyfort 16 Paul Mochalski 5 Austria Brandl & Talos Attorneys at law: Thomas Talos & Nicholas Aquilina 21 Editor Tom McDermott 6 Belgium Sirius Legal: Bart Van den Brande 27 Senior Editor 7 Brazil Montgomery & Associados: Neil Montgomery & Helena Penteado Rachel Williams Moraes Calderano 32 Chief Operating Officer Dror Levy 8 Canada Miller Thomson LLP: Danielle Bush 36 Group Consulting Editor 9 Denmark Horten Law Firm: Nina Henningsen 43 Alan Falach 10 Dutch Caribbean Gaming Legal Group & Carallian: Bas Jongmans & Dick Barmentlo 49 Group Publisher Richard Firth 11 Germany Melchers Law Firm: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA GAMING CONTROL BOARD IN RE: : : APPLICATION OF IOC PITTSBURGH, INC. : DOCKET NO. 1357 : APPLICATION OF PITG GAMING, LLC : DOCKET NO. 1361 : APPLICATION OF STATION SQUARE : GAMING, LP : DOCKET NO. 1363 : Applications for Category 2 : Slot Machine License in Pittsburgh, PA : A City of the Second Class : ORDER AND NOW this 1st day of February, 2007, based upon the full and careful consideration of the record evidence before it, the provisions of the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act (“Act”) (4 Pa.C.S. §§ 1101 – 1904, as amended) and the Act’s accompanying regulations, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) issues the following: IT IS ORDERED THAT, the application for licensure as a Category 2 licensee in the City of Pittsburgh of PITG Gaming, LLC is GRANTED and the license is approved for the reasons set forth in the Gaming Control Board’s Adjudication of the Applications for Category 2 Slot Machine Licenses in Pittsburgh, PA, a City of the Second Class, issued this date, and subject to satisfaction of the following conditions prior to the issuance of the Category 2 license: 1. The expiration of the thirty (30) day appeal period permitted by the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure; 2. The payment of any outstanding fees, other than the $50 million licensing fee, as determined by the PGCB pursuant to 4 Pa.C.S. § 1208; 3. The agreement to the Statement of Conditions of licensure to be imposed and issued by the Gaming Control Board, as evidenced by the signing of the agreement by PITG Gaming, LLC’s executive officer or designee within five business days of the receipt of the Statement of Conditions from the PGCB; and 4.
    [Show full text]
  • By Authority Conferred on the Michigan Gaming Control Board by Section 4 of the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act, 1996 IL 1, MCL 432.204)
    DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY MICHIGAN GAMING CONTROL BOARD CASINO GAMING (By authority conferred on the Michigan gaming control board by section 4 of the Michigan gaming control and revenue act, 1996 IL 1, MCL 432.204) PART 1. DEFINITIONS R 432.1101 Definitions; A to C. Rule 101. As used in these rules: (a) "Act" means the Michigan gaming control and revenue act, 1996 IL 1, MCL 432.201 to 432.226. (b) "Application" means all materials and information comprising the applicant's request for a casino license, supplier's license, or occupational license submitted by the applicant to the board, including, but not limited to, the instructions, forms, and other documents required by the board for purposes of application for a license under the act and these rules. (c) "Associated equipment" means any of the following: (i) Any equipment which is a mechanical, electromechanical, or electronic contrivance, component, or machine and which is used indirectly or directly in connection with gaming. (ii) Any equipment that would not otherwise be classified as a gaming device, including, but not limited to, links, modems, and dedicated telecommunication lines, that connects to progressive electronic gaming devices. (iii) Computerized systems that monitor electronic gaming devices, table games, and other gambling games approved by the board. (iv) Equipment that affects the proper reporting of gross receipts. (v) Devices for weighing and counting money. (vi) Any other equipment that the board determines requires approval as associated equipment to protect the integrity of gaming and ensure compliance with the act and these rules. (d) "Attributed interest" means any direct or indirect interest in a business entity deemed by the board to be held by an individual through holdings of the individual's immediate family or other persons and not through the individual's actual holdings.
    [Show full text]
  • PS 111: Rewards Clubs Live | West Virginia Slots in 2020 Opening
    Rewards Clubs Live | West Virginia Slots in 2020 PS 111: Rewards Clubs Live | West Virginia Slots in 2020 Opening Hello! Today’s episode #111 of the Professor Slots podcast discusses casino rewards clubs. Plus, in this episode I’ll be covering the current state of slot machine casino gambling in the great U.S. state of West Virginia. Thank you for joining me for the Professor Slots podcast show. I’m Jon Friedl and this is the podcast about slot machine casino gambling. It is where I provide knowledge, insights, and tools for helping you improve your slot machine gambling performance. On Last Week’s Episode… In case you missed it, on my last episode I went over casino safety from my weekly live stream Q&A session on YouTube. Further, I reviewed Washington slot machine casino gambling in 2020. I hope you enjoyed listening to my last episode as much as I enjoyed making it for you. Call to Action (add sound effect afterward) Remember to visit professorslots.com/subscribe to get my Free Report Revealing … The top 7 online resources for improving your gambling performance, including the one I’ve used as a top-tier slot machine casino gambler. YouTube Q&A Session from Saturday, October 2, 2020 Here’s the audio recording of my latest live stream Q&A session. Call to Action (add sound effect afterward) Remember to visit professorslots.com/subscribe to get my Free Report Revealing … The top 7 online resources for improving your gambling performance, including the one I’ve used as a top-tier slot machine casino gambler.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaming Regulatory Jurisdiction: the Dual Criteria of Location Acceptability and Applicant Suitability
    GAMING REGULATORY JURISDICTION: THE DUAL CRITERIA OF LOCATION ACCEPTABILITY AND APPLICANT SUITABILITY Sean McGuinness,∗ Laury Macauley,∗∗ Kade Miller∗∗∗ & Paul Bible∗∗∗∗ TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Overview .........................................................................................35 II. Authority ........................................................................................36 III. Location Acceptability Versus Applicant Suitability ...............37 A. Iowa Code ................................................................................37 B. Nevada Location Acceptability .............................................39 C. Mississippi Location Acceptability .......................................42 IV. Applicant Suitability .....................................................................43 V. Conditional Licenses .....................................................................44 ∗ Partner, Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP, Reno, Nevada; Licensed to practice law in Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, and Mississippi; J.D., Drake University Law School, 1989; M.A., Drake University, 1989; B.A., Drake University, 1986. This author practices gaming law before the Nevada State Gaming Control Board, the Nevada Gaming Commission, the Colorado Division of Gaming, the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission, the Iowa Racing & Gaming Commission, and the Mississippi Gaming Commission. ∗∗ Owner, Macauley Law Group, P.C., Reno, Nevada; J.D., University of San Francisco School of Law, 1986; B.A., University of California, Berkeley, 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Programme
    Programme 8th European Conference on Gambling Studies and Policy Issues “Crossroads and roundabouts; the right way forward” 14 – 17 September 2010 Radisson Blu Palais Vienna, Austria The conference language is English 1 Tuesday – 14 September 2010 13.00 – 17.00 Pre conference workshops Merging Compulsive Gambling Treatment and the Criminal Justice System Judge Mark Farrell. Gambling Treatment Court, State of New York Location: Blauer Salon Symptomatic and Causal Behavioral Treatments for Pathological Gambling Professor Dr. Iver Hand and Florentine Larbig, Verthaltenstherapie Falkenried (Behavioral Therapy Falkenried, Gambling Project) Location: Teesalon eN.B. Th registration for the workshop starts at 10.00 15.00 – 20.00 Registration of conference participants 18.00 – 20.00 Welcome cocktail & Writers corner Location: Festsaal I & II * Drinks and snacks * Welcome speech * Participants present reports and books The conference language is English 2 Wednesday – 15 September 2010 08.00 ‐ 17.00 Registration of participants 08.30 – 09.00 Welcome speech & official opening Location: Festaal I & II Mr. Eric van Vondelen, Chairman of the Executive Committee of EASG 09.00 – 10.30 Plenary session ‐ SETTING THE SCENE Location: Festsaal I & II Chair: Eric van Vondelen, Netherlands Gaming Control Board, the Netherlands Can Italy be the template of a Pan‐European regulation? Francesco Rodano, AAMS, Italy After the Great Recession: The Future of Casino Gaming in Europe and Elsewhere Bill Eadington, Institute for the study of gambling and commercial
    [Show full text]
  • Balancing Gaming Regulation and Marijuana
    actually be impacted by any potential overlap of gaming and marijuana. In Nevada, the declared public policy formally recognizes that “the gaming industry is vitally important to the economy of the State and the general welfare of the 7 inhabitants.” This is the cornerstone of Nevada’s public policy that requires the “strict regulation” of all persons, places, activities, and associations related to the operation 8 of licensed gaming establishments. Accordingly, to be licensed to operate a gaming establishment, a person must High Stakes: be of “good character, honesty and integrity” and “whose prior activities, criminal record, if any, reputation, habits and associations do not pose a threat to the public interest Balancing Gaming of the State or the effective regulation and control of 9 gaming … .” In recommending a person or entity to the Nevada Gaming Commission (“Commission”) for Regulation and licensure, the Board has “full and absolute power and authority to recommend the denial of any application … for any cause deemed reasonable by 10 Marijuana the Board.” However, if recommended for and granted a license, a gaming licensee must thereafter By Terry Johnson “continue to meet the applicable standards and qualifications” and “failure to continue to meet such standards and qualifications constitutes grounds for 11 disciplinary action.” A licensee may also be disciplined for, amongst other things, “failure to comply with or make provision for compliance with all federal, state and local laws … pertaining to the operations of a licensed
    [Show full text]
  • Gambling.Com Group Secures PA and WV Approval
    PRESS RELEASE 15 August 2019 Gambling.com Group Secures Go-Ahead for Business in Pennsylvania and West Virginia The U.S. subsidiary of Gambling.com Group Plc (“Gambling.com Group” or the “Group”), KAX Media America Inc, has completed the necessarily application processes and received approval from both the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board and the West Virginia Lottery to provide services to licensed gaming operators in the respective states. The approvals allow the Group to execute commercial agreements with online sports betting, online casino and online poker operators in Pennsylvania and West Virginia. The states are among the first movers, following New Jersey, to enable legal, regulated sports betting since the invalidation of the Professional Amateur and Professional Sports Protection Act (PASPA) in May of 2018. In both Pennsylvania and West Virginia, the Group can strike commercial agreements that include revenue share arrangements with licensed gaming operators. Although active in New Jersey since early 2017, the Group announced earlier this year that it secured approval to create revenue sharing arrangements in New Jersey. Charles Gillespie, Chief Executive of Gambling.com Group Plc, says, “We will seek the necessary licenses and approvals in all U.S. states that decide to properly regulate online gambling with a mobile offering and a competitive landscape. As the American market grows, it’s critical to have resources like Gambling.com and Bookies.com in the conversation to steer consumers toward the safe and regulated gaming environment. With a massive population of die-hard sports fans, Pennsylvania will surely become one of the largest sports betting markets in the U.S.” ### For further information, please contact: Derek Brookmeyer, Director of Communications Phone: +1 616-528-0882, Email: [email protected] Or see: www.gambling.com/corporate This information is information that Gambling.com Group Plc is obliged to make public pursuant to the EU Market Abuse Regulation 596/2014.
    [Show full text]
  • 11/03/15 Nevada Gaming Control Board Mslsr1 09:11
    11/03/15 NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD MSLSR1 09:11 AM Listing of Locations Sorted By PRIMARY NAME Pg 1 meeting all of the following criteria: Inter.Gaming Svc.Provider, Active 888 US INC. 888 US LIMITED 888 US SERVICES INC. C/O 888 US SERVICES-FINANCE DEPARTMENT C/O 888 US SERVICES-FINANCE DEPARTMENT ATTN: FINANCE DEPARTMENT 400 PLAZA DRIVE 400 PLAZA DRIVE 400 PLAZA DRIVE SECAUCUS, NJ 07096-1515 SECAUCUS, NJ 07096-1515 SECAUCUS, NJ 70961-515 AGN, LLC ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LI ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. C/O 888 US SERVICES-FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUILDING A, 85 EPPING RD ATTN: REGULATORY COMPLIANCE 400 PLAZA DRIVE NORTH RYDE, NEW SOUTH WALES 2113 7230 AMIGO ST SECAUCUS, NJ 07096-1515 AUSTRALIA, 2113 LAS VEGAS, NV 89119 BALLY GAMING, INC. EVERI PAYMENTS INC. GOLDEN PAHRUMP TOWN, LLC Dbas BALLY TECHNOLOGIES 7250 S TENAYA WY STE 100 Dbas GOLD TOWN CASINO 6601 S BERMUDA RD LAS VEGAS, NV 89113 771 S FRONTAGE RD LAS VEGAS, NV 89119 PAHRUMP, NV 89048 GOLDEN ROUTE OPERATIONS LLC GTECH (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED GTECH AUSTRIA GMBH ATTN: COMPLIANCE LIAISON C/O TODD GERBER - REGULATORY COMPLIANCE C/O TODD GERBER - REGULATORY COMPLIANCE 6595 S JONES BL 6757 SPENCER ST 6757 SPENCER ST LAS VEGAS, NV 89118 LAS VEGAS, NV 89119 LAS VEGAS, NV 89119 GTECH SWEDEN INTERACTIVE AB GTECH USA, LLC IGT C/O TODD GERBER - REGULATORY COMPLIANCE C/O TODD GERBER - REGULATORY COMPLIANCE ATT: MICHELLE A. CHATIGNY-VP COMPLIANCE 6757 SPENCER ST 6757 SPENCER ST 6355 S BUFFALO DR LAS VEGAS, NV 89119 LAS VEGAS, NV 89119 LAS VEGAS, NV 89113 IGT CANADA SOLUTIONS ULC GOLDEN PAHRUMP LAKESIDE, LLC GOLDEN PAHRUMP NUGGET, LLC C/O TODD GERBER - REGULATORY COMPLIANCE Dbas LAKESIDE CASINO AND RV PARK Dbas PAHRUMP NUGGET HOTEL & GAMBLING HAL 6757 SPENCER ST 5870 HOMESTEAD RD 681 S 160 HY LAS VEGAS, NV 89119 PAHRUMP, NV 89048 PAHRUMP, NV 89048 PEPPERMILL CASINOS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Disposition: Approved
    D I S P O S I T I O N * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A G E N D A * NEVADA GAMING COMMISSION MEETING **(STATE GAMING CONTROL BOARD) State Gaming Control Board Offices Conference Room 2450 555 East Washington Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada July 23, 2009 10:00 A.M. • Pledge of Allegiance • Nonrestricted Agenda Items • Restricted Agenda Items • Administrative Matters • Complaint(s) • Public Comments • Gaming Employee Registrations Pursuant to NRS 463.335(13) • Gaming Employee Registrations Pursuant to NGC Regulation 5.109 • Informational Items Nevada Gaming Commission July 23, 2009 Page 2 10:00 A.M. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 1. CONSIDERATION OF: Administrative Reports . Board Chairman . Pending Applications . Commission Chairman . Attorney General . Senior Research Specialist COMPLAINT(S) 2. CONSIDERATION OF: Settlement Agreement received Settling Complaint filed in the Matter of the STATE GAMING CONTROL BOARD vs. CONVENIENCE MART OF NEVADA, INC., dba ST. TROPEZ CONVENIENCE MART; CONVENIENCE MART OF NEVADA, INC., dba, ST. TROPEZ LIQUOR STORE; RICHARD CARL RITZO; JOELLEN DARLING RITZO; KIMBERLY ANN ANTONACCI; BERNICE E ANTONACCI TRUST; BERNICE ELIZABETH ANTONACCI, Case No. 08-15. STIPULATION ADOPTED AS THE ORDER OF THE NGC. 3. CONSIDERATION OF: Settlement Agreement received Settling Complaint filed in the Matter of the STATE GAMING CONTROL BOARD vs. OPBIZ, LLC, dba PLANET HOLLYWOOD RESORT & CASINO, Case No. 08-18. STIPULATION ADOPTED AS THE ORDER OF THE NGC. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: This public comment agenda item is provided in accordance with NRS 241.020(2)(c)(3) which requires an agenda provide for a period devoted to comments by the general public, if any, and discussion of those comments.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-21 St Annual Report
    Louisiana Gaming Control Board Control Gaming Louisiana 21st Annual Report to the Louisiana State Legislature 2017 MISSION STATEMENT OF THE LOUISIANA GAMING CONTROL BOARD To regulate all gaming activities under its jurisdiction in a manner which instills public confidence and trust that gaming activities are conducted honestly and free from criminal and corruptive elements; to ensure the integrity of individual gaming activities by the regulation of persons, practices, associations and activities within the gaming industry. i TABLE OF CONTENTS LOUISIANA GAMING CONTROL BOARD MISSION STATEMENT ........................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................ ii CHAIRMAN’S LETTER ........................................................................................................................................ 1 ATTORNEY GENERAL’S GAMING DIVISION AND LOUISIANA STATE POLICE PERSONNEL ...... 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 5 RIVERBOAT GAMING ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Riverboat Gaming Activity Summary ................................................................................................................ 7 Riverboat Gaming Licensees .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Holland Casino's Biggest Strength Is That
    CONTENTS ANNUAL REPORT 2016 GOVERNANCE 04 The year 2016 at a glance 68 Composition of the Supervisory Board 05 Key figures 70 Introduction from the Chairman 06 Message from the Chairman of the Board 71 Report of the Supervisory Board 73 Corporate governance ABOUT HOLLAND CASINO 77 Risk management 12 Company profile 14 Mission & strategy FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 16 Business model 84 Financial statements 2016 18 Our environment 130 Other information 25 Value creation 28 Stakeholders ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 33 Materiality matrix 2016 140 Locations casinos 142 Five-year summary 143 About this report REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD 144 Glossary of terms 40 Report of the Executive Board 146 Colophon 48 Our guests 56 Our people 62 Our society 65 In control statement CONTENT KEY FIGURES EB REPORT SB REPORT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS THE YEAR 2016 AT A GLANCE KEYFIGURES Amounts in millions of euros, unless stated otherwise STATEMENT OF INCOME €608.3 MLN €81.7 MLN 2016 2015* Revenue before gaming tax 608.3 576.2 Gaming tax 161.9 153.0 RESULT BEFORE TOTAL REVENUE Net revenue 446.4 423.2 CORPORATE INCOME TAX (+5.6%) Operating expenses -363.9 -351.0 (+15.4%) Operating result 82.5 72.2 Financial income and expenses -1.1 -1.7 Share of profit of equity-accounted investees, net of tax 0.3 0.3 Result before corporate income tax 81.7 70.8 Corporate income tax ** -7.6 0.0 Result after corporate income tax 74.1 70.8 1.1 MLN 5.9 MLN 2,519 FTES 3.5% Other comprehensive income, net of tax *** 0.0 -0.1 Total comprehensive income for the year 74.1 70.7 NUMBER OF GUESTS NUMBER
    [Show full text]