DOCSLIB.ORG

ICTR NEWSLETTER November 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ICTR NEWSLETTER November 2004 Published by the External Relations and Strategic Planning Section – Immediate Office of the Registrar United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda SPECIALSPECIAL EDITIONEDITION International Criminal Tribunal Prosecutors Conclude Conference in Arusha On 27 November, 2004, the Prosecutors also calls upon national and international In This Issue: from the International Criminal Tribunal authorities to assist the tribunals by Joint Statement of the Prosecutors ..................2 for Rwanda (ICTR), the International arresting and transferring indicted fugitives Prosecutor Jallow’s Welcome Address ........2 Criminal Tribunal for the former such as Radovan Karadzic, Ratko Mladic, Challenges of International Criminal Justice .4 Yugoslavia (ICTY), the Special Court for Ante Gotovina, Félicien Kabuga and Challenges of Conducting Investigations of International Crimes ................................................6 Sierra Leone (SCSL) and from the Charles Taylor for trial. General Considerations on the Transfer of International Criminal Court (ICC) Cases and Legal transplants ...............................9 concluded three days of discussions During the three days of meetings in Challenges of International Criminal Justice10 about how to better prepare themselves Arusha, the prosecutors discussed a wide Challenges of the Administration of for meeting the challenges of delivering range of issues they face in bringing to International Criminal Tribunals .......................15 international criminal justice. The justice those most responsible for Note of Thanks from Chief, ERSPS ..............17 prosecutors issued a joint statement genocide, war crimes and crimes against ICTR Special Thanks to the Sponsors, FF and from Arusha, Tanzania, the headquarters humanity in the conflict regions of the OSI ..............................................................................17 of the International Crim inal Tribunal for world. President & Prosecutor Update Security Rwanda (ICTR) where the conference Council on Completion Strategy .....................18 was held. The prosecutors exchanged views on Setako Transferred to Arusha and Pleads Not successful strategies for conducting Guilty ..........................................................................19 The statement was signed by investigations, protecting witnesses and UN Fun Day ............................................................20 prosecutors Hassan Bubacar Jallow, of enforcing sentences against convicts of the A Tribute to Judge Gunawardana ..................21 the ICTR, Carla Del Ponte, of the international tribunals. They also assessed International Criminal Tribunal for the how best to administer tribunals and to Editor-in-chief: Roland Amoussouga former Yugoslavia (ICTY), Luis Moreno complete their work in the time limits Senior Editor: Bocar Sy Ocampo of the ICC and David Crane of prescribed by the United Nations. Executive Editor: Timothy Gallimore the Special Court for Sierra Leone. Layout/Design: Rani Dogra and Serena The prosecutors have formed a task force Simonson The prosecutors reaffirmed their to gather and exchange strategies and Contributions: President Eric Møse, Prosecutor Hassan B. Jallow, Danford commitment to ending impunity, best practices for the prosecution of Mpumilwa, Staff Association deterring crimes against humanity, international crimes. They agreed to meet E-Mail: [email protected] instituting a culture of accountability and again in six months in Sierra Leone. bringing about peace and reconciliation in post-conflict societies. Their statement ICTR NEWSLETTER November 2004 National legal systems have a vital role in the Other presenters at the conference included: Adama prosecution of these grave crimes. International Dieng, ICTR Registrar; Navanethem Pillay, Appeals institutions need step in only when national systems Judge at the ICC and former President of the ICTR; lack the strength or impartiality to hold the most Lovemore Munlo, Deputy Registrar at ICTR, Gavin serious offenders to account. Combined national and Ruxton, Chief of prosecutions at the ICTY; Martin international efforts will be a guarantee of impartial Ngoga, Deputy Prosecutor General of Rwanda; justice. Bernard Muna, former Deputy Prosecutor of the ICTR; We reaffirm our commitment to the task that has been Michael Bohlander from the University of Durham and entrusted to us. We call upon all national and Binaifer Nowrojee of Human Rights Watch and international authorities to strengthen their dedication Harvard Law School. to justice. The colloquium was funded by grants to the ICTR from We believe that the people of the world are entitled to the Ford Foundation and the Open Society Institute. a system that will deter grave international crimes and hold to account those who bear the greatest responsibility. Only when a culture of accountability has replaced the culture of impunity can the diverse Joint Statement of the Prosecutors people of the world live and prosper together in peace. Signed on this 27th day of November 2004. As international prosecutors, we have been entrusted with the responsibility of bringing to justice individuals Signed by: accused of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. Luis Moreno Ocampo Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court We represent all the regions of the world. Our institutions were variously founded by treaty, by the Carla Del Ponte United Nations Security Council, or by agreement Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the between the United Nations and national governments. former Yugoslavia Having reviewed the challenges of international Hassan Bubacar Jallow criminal justice, we have concluded that the ideal Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for behind the establishment of each of our institutions is Rwanda the same: to end impunity for the most serious crimes that plague humankind, and to contribute to peace and David Crane the prevention of future crimes. Prosecutor of the Special Court for Sierra Leone These tribunals have made great progress. Heads of state or government have been brought to justice. Other major perpetrators have been indicted, Welcome Address by Prosecutor arrested and tried; many have been convicted; trials are ongoing. These institutions have recognized that Jallow to the Colloquium of genocide can be committed through acts of sexual Prosecutors of the International violence; they have found that the use of child soldiers Criminal Tribunals is a crime against humanity, they have brought the weight of law to bear on the evils of ethnic Your Honour Mr. cleansing. But because many people continue to President of the suffer from these crimes throughout the world, we ICTR, affirm that only a sustained commitment to Honourable accountability will deter these atrocities. Judges, Mr. Registrar, The ultimate success of these tribunals depends on Distinguished the continued political support of the international Guests, community. Resources, cooperation, and assistance Members of staff, are essential to enforce the principle of accountability and the rule of law. Prosecutor Jallow addresses the It is my singular Prosecutors’ Colloquium honour and The resolve of the international community will also be pleasure to measured by its willingness to deliver indictees for trial, welcome you all to this Colloquium of the even if politically difficult. International criminal justice Prosecutors of the international criminal tribunals. A must apply to indicted fugitives such as Radovan special welcome is extended to my honourable Karadzic, Ratko Mladic, Ante Gotovina, Félicien colleagues, Louis Moreno O’Campo, the Prosecutor Kabuga, and Charles Taylor. To permit individuals of the International Criminal Court (ICC), as well as accused of the gravest of crimes to evade justice the two Deputy Prosecutors of the ICC, Mr. David would reinforce the culture of impunity that fuels Crane, the Prosecutor of the Special Court for conflict and atrocities. 2 ICTR NEWSLETTER November 2004 Sierra Leone (SCSL), Mr. Longuino Monteiro, the decade since the establishment of the tribunals it is fair Prosecutor General of East Timor, Mr. Martin Ngoga, to conclude that, measured against their objectives Deputy Prosecutor General of Rwanda, the and the expectations of the founders, these institutions Representative of the government of Mali, together have had a reasonable level of success: despite many with their delegations, the Chief of Prosecutions at the considerable constraints –novelty, of resources, of OTP-ICTY who is deputising for the Prosecutor, as logistics and of a jurisprudential clean slate on the well as the distinguished independent experts who most important issues they were required to resolve. have been invited to participate. I also recognize the presence of Judge Navanethem Pillay, former In the decade of their existence, the Ad Hoc tribunals President of the ICTR and now a Judge of the Appeals have made a significant contribution in filling in the Chamber of the ICC and Dr. Bernard Muna, former jurisprudential vacuum by developing and enriching the Deputy Prosecutor of the ICTR. jurisprudence of international criminal law and in elaborating upon the rules of practice, procedure and This colloquium, which for the first time brings together evidence as well as setting out international standards the Prosecutors of the Tribunals, has been for long in of fair trial. Substantial experience and expertise has the pipeline. A combination
Recommended publications
  • Mr. Luis Moreno-Ocampo Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court

    Mr. Luis Moreno-Ocampo Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court

    Le Bureau du Procureur The Office of the Prosecutor Mr. Luis Moreno‐Ocampo Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Seventeenth Diplomatic Briefing Statement The Hague, 4 November 2009 English Version Check upon Delivery Maanweg 174, 2516 AB The Hague, The Netherlands – Maanweg 174, 2516 AB La Haye, Pays-Bas www.icc-cpi.int Telephone – Téléphone +31(0)70 515 85 15 / Facsimile – Télécopie +31(0)70 515 87 77 Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, As the President said, States have the opportunity to transform the Kampala Review Conference into a major milestone. The next Assembly will be a great moment for you to finalize your plans and exercise your collective responsibilities. How to do it is of course the responsibility of States. As the President said, it would be improper for the Court to take any position on amendments to be decided by States. As the Prosecutor, my Office’s contribution is a public Prosecutorial Strategy and a report on the activities of the last three years that you will receive before the end of the year, taking in consideration the consultation process conducted, including meetings in New York, The Hague and yesterday in Geneva. The Prosecution is presenting its own plans in order to increase predictability and to help stakeholders to produce their own plans. Our Prosecutorial Strategy is our independent contribution to the Court Strategic plan. It focuses on our activities but also present areas where we can work together. Let me now quickly update you on the Prosecution activities: The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) In DRC 1, Prosecutor versus Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, we concluded the presentation of our evidence and we are now waiting for the Appeal Chamber to make a decision.
  • Principle of the Rome Statute of the Icc Within the African Union: Opportunities and Challenges

    Principle of the Rome Statute of the Icc Within the African Union: Opportunities and Challenges

    Brooklyn Journal of International Law Volume 43 | Issue 2 Article 10 6-1-2018 Pull and Push'- Implementing the Complementarity Principle of the Rome Statute of the ICC within the AU: Opportunities and Challenges Sascha Dominik Dov Bachmann Eda Luke Nwibo Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, and the Transnational Law Commons Recommended Citation Sascha Dominik D. Bachmann & Eda L. Nwibo, Pull and Push'- Implementing the Complementarity Principle of the Rome Statute of the ICC within the AU: Opportunities and Challenges, 43 Brook. J. Int'l L. 457 (2018). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol43/iss2/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. PULL AND PUSH—IMPLEMENTING THE COMPLEMENTARITY PRINCIPLE OF THE ROME STATUTE OF THE ICC WITHIN THE AFRICAN UNION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES Sascha Dominik Dov Bachmann* & Eda Luke Nwibo< INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 459 I. THE ROME STATUTE’S COMPLEMENTARITY PRINCIPLE UNDER ARTICLE 17 AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND NATIONAL LEGAL ORDERS................ 467 A. The Relationship Between International and National Systems of Criminal Justice and the ICC .......................... 468 B. The Rationale Behind Primacy and Complementarity Regimes ............................................................................... 472 1. The Primacy Relationship of the ICTY and the ICTR 475 2. The Complementarity Relationship of the ICC .......... 477 C. Models of Complementarity...........................................
  • Bensouda, Fatou (The Gambia)

    Bensouda, Fatou (The Gambia)

    Fatou BENSOUDA Current contact details: Deputy Prosecutor for Prosecution Prosecutions Division, Office of the Prosecutor International Criminal Court Maanweg 174 2516 AB, Den Haag The Netherlands Statement of Qualifications Date of Birth: 31 January 1961 Place of Birth: Banjul, The Gambia Nationality: Gambian Status: Married with children Education 1990-1991: Master of Laws, International Maritime Law, UN/IMO International Maritime Law Institute. 1986-1987: Barrister-at-Law, Nigeria Law School, Lagos, Nigeria. 1983-1986: Bachelor of Laws (Honours), University of IFE (Now OAU University), Ife, Nigeria. Language knowledge Wollof, English, French: Good knowledge. Professional Experience 2002- Oct. 04: Senior Legal Adviser/Trial Attorney, ICTR, Kigali, Rwanda. 2002: General Manager, International Bank for Commerce Limited, Banjul, The Gambia. 2000-2002: Private Legal Practitioner, Ya Sadi Chambers, Bensouda and Co. Leman St. Banjul, The Gambia 1998-2000: Attorney General and Secretary of State for (Minister of) Justice of the Republic of The Gambia. 1997-1998: Solicitor General and Legal Secretary of the Republic of The Gambia. 1993-1997: Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions, Republic of The Gambia. 1992-1993: Principal State Counsel. 1990-1992: Senior State Counsel. 1988-1990: State Counsel. 1987-1988: Public Prosecutor. 1980-1982: Clerk of the Court, Judicial Department. Other Professional Training 2001: Diploma: Volunteerism, International Olympic Committee, New York, USA. 1998: Certificate: Computer and Information Technology, Management Development Institute, The Gambia. 1994: Certificate: Oxford Conference on Mutual Legal Assistance, Oxford, England. 1993: Certificate: Conference on Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability, The Gambia. 1989: Certificate: Human Rights Training for Commonwealth Public Officials, Banjul, The Gambia. 1988: Certificate: International Law Programme, International Court of Justice, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • A Prosecutor Falls, Time for the Court to Rise by Morten Bergsmo, Wolfgang Kaleck, Sam Muller and William H

    A Prosecutor Falls, Time for the Court to Rise by Morten Bergsmo, Wolfgang Kaleck, Sam Muller and William H

    POLICY BRIEF SERIES A Prosecutor Falls, Time for the Court to Rise By Morten Bergsmo, Wolfgang Kaleck, Sam Muller and William H. Wiley FICHL Policy Brief Series No. 86 (2017) 1. The Promise of the International Criminal Court only proposing that it “will not be disappointed thanks to the Let us step back in time, to Saturday 18 July 1998. There was farsightedness shown by all of you and the countries you rep- intense sunlight over the Capitoline Hill – ‘Collis Capitōlīnus’, resent”, the Florentine also invoked “the pressure of civil soci- one of the Seven Hills of Rome – where some of the delegates ety”, making the success possible as they “passionately backed 5 who had negotiated the Statute of the International Criminal the work of governments”. He linked the United Nations’ own Court (‘ICC’) during the preceding five weeks were gradually credibility – which “has now been further enhanced” – to the 6 assembling. They looked tired but contented, as if surprised that Statute. He crowned his language describing the commitment they had just managed to complete a marathon. Some sported of the moment by stating that “it will mark not only a political 7 sunglasses, while formally dressed for the imminent ceremony but a moral stride forward by international society”. to mark the successful conclusion of the United Nations Diplo- In hindsight, Dini’s statement stands out for its prescient, matic Conference. veiled warning that States Parties and the ICC should heed in- Of the present co-authors, Morten Bergsmo was there, hav- ternational expectations, retain the support of civil society, and ing represented the ex-Yugoslavia and Rwanda Tribunals at the show foresight in preserving the credibility of international or- Conference.
  • The United States, the International Criminal Court, and the Situation in Afghanistan

    The United States, the International Criminal Court, and the Situation in Afghanistan

    Notre Dame Law Review Reflection Volume 95 Issue 2 Article 1 12-2019 The United States, the International Criminal Court, and the Situation in Afghanistan Sara L. Ochs Elon University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr_online Part of the Criminal Law Commons, International Law Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Notre Dame L. Rev. Reflection 89 (2019). This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Law Review at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review Reflection by an authorized editor of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UNITED STATES, THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, AND THE SITUATION IN AFGHANISTAN Sara L. Ochs* INTRODUCTION The United States has always had a very complicated and tense relationship with the International Criminal Court (ICC) and with international criminal law generally.1 Yet, under the Trump administration, the U.S.–ICC relationship has deteriorated to an unprecedented level. Within the last few years, the U.S. government has launched a full-scale attack on the ICC—denouncing its legitimacy, authority, and achievements, blocking investigations, and loudly withdrawing all once-existing support for the court. These hostilities bubbled over following the November 2017 request by the ICC Chief Prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, for the court to open an investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Afghanistan since 2003, including those perpetrated by the U.S. military.2 The U.S. government has always viewed the ICC as an entity designed to infringe on state sovereignty, and Prosecutor Bensouda’s request immediately invited harsh retaliation from the Trump administration.
  • Ms Fatou Bensouda Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court the Hague (By Email) 23 February 2021

    Ms Fatou Bensouda Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court the Hague (By Email) 23 February 2021

    www.parliament.uk Ms Fatou Bensouda Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court The Hague (By email) 23 February 2021 Dear Ms Bensouda, As you may be aware, the Government introduced the Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill to the UK Parliament last year and Parliament is currently debating this Bill. The Joint Committee on Human Rights, which I chair, has considered the human rights implications of this Bill in its Report, “Legislative Scrutiny: Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill”.1 In our scrutiny of the Bill, and in subsequent debates on the Bill in both Houses of Parliament, mention has been made of the role of the International Criminal Court and whether the Bill would increase the risk of the Office of the Prosecutor needing to consider cases relating the UK Armed Forces personnel. Following the Prosecutor’s determination on the preliminary examination of the situation in Iraq/UK issued by your office on 9 December 2020, we would welcome any observations you may have on the possible relationship between the Bill and the ICC’s jurisdiction. A reply by 5 March 2021 would be most welcome. Yours sincerely Rt Hon Harriet Harman QC MP Chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights Copied to: OTP Information Desk Rod Rastan 1 https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/3191/documents/39059/default/ Rt Hon Harriet Harman QC MP Chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights Committee Office House of Commons London SW1A 0AA Ref.: OTP2021/003488 Date: 5 March 2021 Dear Ms Harman, I write further to your letter of 23 February 2021, concerning the current consideration by the Joint Committee on Human Rights of the human rights implications of the Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill currently before Parliament.
  • Öffentliche Anhörung Des Bundestags-Ausschusses Für Menschenrechte Und Humanitäre Hilfe Zum Thema „Straflosigkeit“

    Öffentliche Anhörung Des Bundestags-Ausschusses Für Menschenrechte Und Humanitäre Hilfe Zum Thema „Straflosigkeit“

    Öffentliche Anhörung des Bundestags-Ausschusses für Menschenrechte und humanitäre Hilfe zum Thema „Straflosigkeit“ Schriftliche Stellungnahme zum Fragenkatalog von Prof. Carsten Stahn (Leiden/Belfast) I. Vorbemerkungen 1. Das gegenwärtige Völkerstrafrecht ist ein wesentlicher Bestandteil zur Durchsetzung des internationalen Menschenrechtsschutzes. Internationale und nationale Strafgerichtsgerichtsbarkeit haben dabei eine entscheidende Funktion. Dennoch sollte ihre Rolle nicht überspannt werden. Der Begriff der Straflosigkeit, der vorwiegend im Zusammenhang im Zusammenhang mit der Aufarbeitung von Militärdiktaturen in Mittel-und Lateinamerika entstanden ist (impunidad)1, muß in einem umfassenden Sinne verstanden werden. Er bezeichnet die Unmöglichkeit Straftäter de jure oder de facto zur Rechenschaft zu ziehen.2 Strafrecht ist nur eines von vielen Mitteln, um schwerwiegende Menschenrechtsverletzungen zu ahnden. Strafe als solche ist kein Selbstzweck. Es geht nicht nur per se um strafrechtliche Sanktion, sondern umfassender um Faktenermittlung, die Begründung von Verantwortlichkeitsstrukturen, rechtstaatliche Verfahren sowie Wiedergutmachung für Opfer. Strafe muss gerade im Bereich von Makrokriminalität und Systemverbrechen in umfassender Weise verstanden werden. Beispiele wie Ruanda oder der Friedensprozess in Kolumbien haben vor Augen geführt, daß Wahrheitsfindung, Suche und Identifizierung verschwundener Personen, Wiedergutmachung, Strafmilderung und alternativer Strafvollzug oder berufsrechtliche Beschränkungen (‘vetting‘) wichtige
  • Case 4:21-Cv-00416 Document 1 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 34

    Case 4:21-Cv-00416 Document 1 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 34

    Case 4:21-cv-00416 Document 1 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 34 1 Abigail P. Barnes (Bar No. 313809) Scarlet Kim* COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Dror Ladin* 2 Salesforce Tower Hina Shamsi* 415 Mission Street, Suite 5400 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 3 San Francisco, California 94105-2533 FOUNDATION Telephone: +1 (415) 591-6000 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor 4 Facsimile: +1 (415) 591-6091 New York, NY 10004 Email: [email protected] Telephone: +1 (212) 549-2660 5 Email: [email protected], [email protected], Trisha B. Anderson* [email protected] 6 David M. Zionts* Alexander N. Ely* *Application for admission pro hac vice 7 Diana Lee* forthcoming COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 8 One CityCenter Attorneys for Plaintiffs 850 Tenth Street, NW 9 Washington, DC 20001-4956 Telephone: +1 (202) 662-6000 10 Facsimile: +1 (202) 662-6291 Email: [email protected], [email protected], 11 [email protected], [email protected] 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 LEILA N. SADAT; K. ALEXA KOENIG; NAOMI Civil Case No.: ROHT-ARRIAZA; and STEVEN M. WATT, 15 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND Plaintiffs, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 16 v. 17 DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as 18 President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; MICHAEL R. 19 POMPEO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; 20 STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury; U.S. DEPARTMENT 21 OF JUSTICE; JEFFREY A. ROSEN, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General; OFFICE OF 22 FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL; and ANDREA M.
  • Othering Across Borders

    Othering Across Borders

    Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers 5-1-2021 Othering Across Borders Steven Arrigg Koh Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, International Law Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Duke Law Journal Online VOLUME 70 MAY 2021 OTHERING ACROSS BORDERS STEVEN ARRIGG KOH† ABSTRACT Our contemporary moment of reckoning presents an opportunity to evaluate racial subordination and structural inequality throughout our three-tiered domestic, transnational, and international criminal law system. In particular, this Essay exposes a pernicious racial dynamic in contemporary U.S. global criminal justice policy, which I call othering across borders. First, this othering may occur when race emboldens political and prosecutorial actors to prosecute foreign defendants. Second, racial animus may undermine U.S. engagement with international criminal legal institutions, specifically the International Criminal Court. This Essay concludes with measures to mitigate such othering. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................. 161 I. The Reckoning: New Fronts in Race and Criminal Justice ................... 165 A. Two Case Examples ............................................................... 167 B. Othering Across Borders ........................................................ 171 II. The Reformation .................................................................................
  • Africa and the International Criminal Court: Behind the Backlash and Toward Future Solutions

    Africa and the International Criminal Court: Behind the Backlash and Toward Future Solutions

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bowdoin College Bowdoin College Bowdoin Digital Commons Honors Projects Student Scholarship and Creative Work 2017 Africa and the International Criminal Court: Behind the Backlash and Toward Future Solutions Marisa O'Toole Bowdoin College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects Part of the African Studies Commons, International Law Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation O'Toole, Marisa, "Africa and the International Criminal Court: Behind the Backlash and Toward Future Solutions" (2017). Honors Projects. 64. https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects/64 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship and Creative Work at Bowdoin Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Bowdoin Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AFRICA AND THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT Behind the Backlash and Toward Future Solutions An Honors Paper for the Department of Government and Legal Studies By Marisa O’Toole Bowdoin College, 2017 ©2017 Marisa O’Toole Introduction Marisa O’Toole Introduction Following the end of World War II, members of international society acknowledged its obligation to address international crimes of mass barbarity. Determined to prevent the recurrence of such atrocities, members took action to create a system of international individual criminal legal accountability. Beginning with the Nuremberg and Tokyo War Crimes trials in 19451 and continuing with the establishment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in 19932 and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in 19943, the international community commenced its ad hoc prosecution of individuals for the commission of international crimes.
  • The Biden Administration Must Defend Americans Targeted by the International Criminal Court Steven Groves

    The Biden Administration Must Defend Americans Targeted by the International Criminal Court Steven Groves

    BACKGROUNDER No. 3622 | MAY 17, 2021 MARGARET THATCHER CENTER FOR FREEDOM The Biden Administration Must Defend Americans Targeted by the International Criminal Court Steven Groves he Declaration of Independence cataloged the KEY TAKEAWAYS ways in which King George III infringed upon American liberties. Among King George’s Since its founding, the United States has T offenses listed in the Declaration was “Transporting tried to protect its citizens from legal us beyond the Seas to be tried for pretended Offences.” harassment and persecution by foreign courts. The king claimed the authority to seize American col- onists and force them to stand trial in Great Britain for criminal offenses allegedly committed in America. The Prosecutor of the International Almost 250 years later, another foreign tribunal— Criminal Court has compiled a secret annex listing American citizens to be the International Criminal Court (ICC), located in targeted for prosecution for alleged war The Hague in the Netherlands—is working toward crimes. issuing arrest warrants for American citizens for allegedly abusing detainees in Afghanistan. The court The Biden Administration should stop the is pursuing this course despite the fact that the United ICC from persisting in its misguided pros- States is not a party to the Rome Statute of the Inter- ecution of American citizens that have national Criminal Court and therefore not subject to already been investigated by the U.S. the ICC’s jurisdiction. This paper, in its entirety, can be found at http://report.heritage.org/bg3622 The Heritage Foundation | 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 546-4400 | heritage.org Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress.
  • Annexure C ICC-02/05-03/09-188-Anxc 05-08-2011 2/14 RH T OA

    Annexure C ICC-02/05-03/09-188-Anxc 05-08-2011 2/14 RH T OA

    ICC-02/05-03/09-188-AnxC 05-08-2011 1/14 RH T OA Annexure C ICC-02/05-03/09-188-AnxC 05-08-2011 2/14 RH T OA International Criminal Court ICC-ASP/3/8 Distr.: General Assembly of States Parties 21 July 2004 Original: English Languages: All Third session The Hague 6-10 September 2004 Election of the Deputy Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Note by the Secretariat 1. Under the terms of article 42, paragraph 4, of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and paragraph 32 of Assembly of States Parties resolution ICC-ASP/1/Res.2 on the procedure for the nomination and election of judges, the Prosecutor and Deputy Prosecutors of the Court, the Prosecutor shall nominate three candidates for each position of Deputy Prosecutor to be filled. 2. In a letter dated 15 July 2004, the Prosecutor of the Court transmitted to the President of the Assembly of States Parties his nomination of the following three candidates for the position of Deputy Prosecutor of the Court (see annex): Ms. Fatou Bensouda (The Gambia) Ms. Nicola Crutchley (New Zealand) Mr. Josaia Naigulevu (Fiji) 3. In addition, the letter included a description of the procedures followed for the selection of candidates (see annex, appendix I), as well as a compilation of statements of qualifications (see annex, appendix II), submitted in accordance with paragraph 33 of the above-mentioned resolution. 4. Under the terms of paragraph 37 of the same resolution, the procedures for the election of the Prosecutor in section E of that resolution shall apply mutatis mutandis to the election of any Deputy Prosecutor.