Prosthodontics. Periodontics. Endodontics. Research. Laboratory Considerations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prosthodontics. Periodontics. Endodontics. Research. Laboratory Considerations Prosthodontics. Periodontics. Endodontics. Research. Laboratory Considerations VOLUME 4 No 2 MARCH 2002 .Aesthetic RestorativeOptions and Implant Site Enhancement Using Orthodontic Extrusion .Immediate Implant PlacementWith Immediate Provisional Crown Placement \ .Multidisciplinary Approach for Achieving Aesthetics in a Cleft lip and Palate Patient ,~,~..i":~"~ A Montage'Media, Publication MONTAGE MEDIA CORPORATION IS AN ADA CERP RECOGNIZED PROVIDER Practical Procedures & AESTHETICDENTISTRY Figure 2. The metal try-in of multiple single units. It is difficult to distinguish between implants and natural tooth abutments. Figure 1. The implant site consists of the surrounding socket walls of an extracted tooth, the shape of the root, and the continuity of form emerging from the implant leading to the proposed restoration. W hile the treatment of hopeless, fractured, or miss- ing teeth has traditionally presented difficulties within the anterior region, one of the primary consid- Figure 3. Size 30 endodontic files with rubber erations in deciding on tooth replacement procedures stops were used to measure the interproximal has been a lack of predictability in constructing an aes- peak of bone on the adjacent sites and their distance from the final contact points. thetic restoration, particularly following implant therapy. Most clinicians have limited guidance in the evaluation and then selection of the appropriate restorative options in the "aesthetic zone." Recent investigations have focused on the diagnostic evaluation of a site prior to selecting a particular restorative option for tooth replace- ment (Tablel. This selection criteria is based upon a thorough evaluation of the alveolar bone surrounding the site, particularly the interproximal bone, which sig- Figure 4. Radiographic measurements display the impor- nifiCantly influences individual tooth form and aesthet- tance of the measurement of the adjacent sites in predicting ics (Figures 1 through 41. anticipated soft tissue position interproximally between implants, natural teeth, and pontics. One of the primary reasons for failure in this region has been ineffective or missing "diagnostic indicators" that cause aesthetic tooth replacement sele<;;tion of a sounding .of the interproximal peaks must be performed, site to be unpredictable. If) an attempt to simplify the and the laI:Jial plate must be located prior to selection of diagnostic process, the authors defined future restora- the appropriate restoration (Figures 5 and 6). As described tive sites as: 1) existing edentulous spans (ie, delayed by Tarnow and Kois, as well as Salama et al, the loca- sites), and 2) hopeless teeth prior to planned extrac- tion of the interproximal peak of bone will allow deter- tions (eg, immediate sites). During the treatment of a mination of the an!icipated quality of the interproximal previously extracted tooth in an edentulous ,5pan, bone soft tissues around the restorations."3 The interproximal \ 126 Vol. 14, No.2 Salama Figure 5. An ovate pontic preparation was Figure 6. Labial plate and interproximal bone performed prior to delayed implant placement. sounding is required prior to implant placement. Figure 7. The fractured left central incisor was Figure 8. Bone sounding was performed prior radiographically observed and a poor prognosis to extraction on the mesial and distal aspects of was determined. the hopeless tooth. Adequate bone support for interdental soft tissue response was indicated. peak of bone has been indirectly utilized in the middle of bone on the adjacent teeth, implants, or pontic areas of the contact area to suggest the predictability of papilla should, therefore, facilitate appropriate selection of a around dental implants.4 Probing of the site adjacent to proposed restoration. Based upon a variety of clinical the proposed implant has also demonstrated efficacy in data (Table!, the preoperative bone sounding measure- predicting the postoperative location of the interproxi- ments should facilitate the selection of an optimal restora- mal soft tissue levels.3 Probing of the interproximal peaks tive option that corresponds to the surrounding bony PPAD 127 Practical Procedures & AESTHETiC DENTISTRY Figure 9. Preoperative facial view Figure 10. Orthodontic extrusion and Figure II. Immediate implant place- demonstrates the presence of a sub- occlusal adjustment was performed ment was performed following atrau- gingival fracture on the maxillary left to enhance the bone and soft tissue matic extraction utilizing a tapered central incisor within the lip perimeter dimensions 8 to 12 weeks prior to implant, approximately 5.5 mm in and the oesthetic zone. extraction. diameter, to replace the extracted central incisor. Figure 12. A healing abutment was Figure 13. Postoperative facial view Figure 14. Periotomes are ideal for used for vertical support of the soft demonstrates enhanced aesthetics atraumatic extraction following ortho- tissues. Note the added dimension and surrounding soft tissue health. dontic extrusion, as they place no of soft tissue provided by the ortho- added pressure on the surrounding dontic treatment. bony walls. anatomy of the individual patient.5 Since many post- a vertical direction and thereby relocate the bone and operative complications are developed due to poor soft tissues coronally to extraction (Figure 10). This tech- diagnosis and not from lack of technical expertise, this nique generally requires approximately 8 to 1 2 weeks of information will significantly influence the development orthodontic extrusion followed by 4 to 6 weeks of stabili- of an aesthetic result. zation. The levels of orthodontic forces applied are light Bone sounding is an important aspect of the diagnos- tic phase during the treatment of teeth that are scheduled for extraction (eg, immediate sites) (Figures 7 and 8). The site can then be evaluated and orthodontically altered if it is determined to be inadequate:6 Orthodontic tooth movement will allow for a simplified nonsurgical approach to enhancing areas with poor soft tissue levels, recession, or missing papillae with inadequate interproximal peaks of bone prior to extraction and immediate implant place- ment (Figure 9). The orthodontic augmentation technique utilizes the remaining attachment apparatus around the hopeless Figure 15. Selection of the implont diameters is based tooth by providing orthodontic tension on the periodon- upon the anticipated location of the head of the fixture in tal ligament to manipulate the attachment apparatus in relqtion to the mesial distal diameter of the root anatomy. 128 Vol. 14, No.2 Solomo Figure 16. Following extraction with Figure 17. Utilizing a temporary Figure 18. Five months postoperative the periotomes, the implant site is cylinder, a healing abutment was healing and maturotion of the soft internally and externally reevaluated customized to reestablish the proper tissue. Note the health and contour of with a probe. subgingival contours and support the soft tissue that was formed utiliz- the interdental papillae and labial ing a customized healing abutment. gingiva. Figure ]9. A permanent abutment Figure 20. The all-ceramic cerabase Figure 21. The all-ceramic abutment sleeve was placed to facilitate the use abutment was placed on the labora- was placed on the soft tissue model of an all-ceramic (cerabase) abutment. tory model. prior to preparation of the final Screw access was palatal to the adja- abutment chamfer line. cent incisal edges. (approximately 80g to 120g 1and the teeth should demon- cases without the need for raising a flap -and avoids strate no sign of inflammation or periodontal or periapical stripping of the periosteum and compromising the vas- pathology. Following stabilization, extraction and imme- cularity of the buccal plate. Utilization of this technique diate implant placement are suggested (Figure 111.7 can provide the practitioner with a shorter, simplified, To account for potential recession and shrinkage of and more efficient approach to management of tooth the hard and soft tissues following surgery, the authors replacement procedures in the anterior region. Clinicians recommend approximately 20% to 25% overcorrec- have been utilizing this technique since 1996 with the tion of the site prior to extraction and immediate implant results comparable to traditional single-stage implant tech- placement (Figure 121. Following atraumatic extraction, niques (Figure 13). it is necessary to once again reevaluate the site utilizing Once orthodontic treatment has optimized the site the aforementioned bone sounding techniques. Selection and overcorrected the hard and soft tissue dimensions of the appropriate implant diameters, shape, and thread vertically, the teeth are extracted with periotdmes in an design then becomes paramount in managing the implant atraumati~ method. The periodontal ligament spaces site. A tapered implant system with different anatomic should be engaged in an apical direction to slowly tear diameters may allow for a true anatomic reconstruction those fibers and release the tooth without destruction or beginning at the neck of the implant and may allow for pressure of standard elevators to the surrounding socket an enhanced engagement of the tapered implant to the and bony walls (Figure 14). Once the tooth is extracted, tapered extraction site. As with other implant systems, the extraction site is internally and externally evaluated this allows for atraumatic surgical placement- in many via bone sounding (Figures 15 and 16). In the absence
Recommended publications
  • The Evolution of Surgical Endodontics: Never and Always Prof. Marwan Abou-Rass DDS, MDS, Ph.D
    The Evolution of Surgical Endodontics: Never and Always Prof. Marwan Abou-Rass DDS, MDS, Ph.D Introduction This paper came out of discussions with Hu-Friedy as we were developing new materials describing the Marwan Abou-Rass, or “MAR” microsurgical endodontic instrument line. Since I have been teaching, conducting research and performing microsurgical endodontics for many years, Hu-Friedy was interested in my perspective on the evolution of the specialty, and what the future might hold. I tried to fit it all in the sales brochure we were working on, but how can one compress decades of change into a few short paragraphs? Hence, we decided to make it a separate venture. Since graduating from dental school and completing my endodontic training, I have been immersed in university environments where dialog regarding best practices in endodontics can be collaborative, and sometimes heated -- because my academic and clinical peers are passionate about what we do. Throughout my career I have collaborated with many global peers who have combined innovation and critical thinking with willingness to risk being “wrong”. As a result, the profession has made significant advances for which we have all benefited. It is for them that I dedicate this paper. This paper outlines my perspective on how microsurgical endodontics has progressed over several decades, from its infancy in the 1940s, through developments which have shaped the practice today. I conclude with “educated guesses” regarding what the future may hold. I. The Influence of Oral Surgery Period In the 1940s, endodontic surgery was often performed by oral surgeons, adapting their methods and instruments used for oral surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical SHOWCASE Unintentional Replantation: a Technique to Avoid
    Clinical SHOWCASE Unintentional Replantation: A Technique to Avoid Robert S. Roda, DDS, MS any times in a dentist’s career, he the greatest contour of the alveolar or she will make a decision that swelling was over the upper left cuspid. Mhas unintended consequences. In Both teeth had been prepared as bridge the case reported here, some quick abutments, but the temporary bridge was thinking was required to resolve the out- not present. There was an open come of an unexpected series of events. endodontic access in the premolar with Because clinical learning is best achieved no pulp exposure and a small composite by retrospective analysis, a list of lessons resin restoration in the cuspid. Both the to be learned from this case is also pro- cuspid and the second premolar were vided, in the hope that it helps readers to tender to percussion. The cuspid was also avoid this particular situation. very tender to bite (determined with a Tooth Slooth instrument, Professional Case Report Results Inc, Laguna Niguel, Calif.) and to A 63-year-old woman presented with buccal alveolar palpation. The premolar severe pain and extraoral facial swelling in The articles for this was not tender to bite or palpation. The the upper left quadrant, which had begun month’s “Clinical cuspid did not respond to cold tests, the day before the visit and was wors- Showcase” section were whereas the premolar was hyperrespon- ening. Her medical history was noncon- written by speakers sive but with nonlingering pain consistent at the 2006 CDA Annual tributory except for mitral valve prolapse with reversible pulpitis.
    [Show full text]
  • CODA.Org: Accreditation Standards for Prosthodontics Programs
    Commission on Dental Accreditation Accreditation Standards for Advanced Dental Education Programs in Prosthodontics Accreditation Standards for Advanced Dental Education Programs in Prosthodontics Commission on Dental Accreditation 211 East Chicago Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60611-2678 (312) 440-4653 www.ada.org/coda Copyright© 2020 Commission on Dental Accreditation All rights reserved. Reproduction is strictly prohibited without prior written permission. Prosthodontics Standards -2- Accreditation Standards for Advanced Dental Education Programs in Prosthodontics Document Revision History Date Item Action August 7, 2015 Accreditation Standards for Advanced Adopted Specialty Education Programs in Prosthodontics August 7, 2015 Revision to Policy on Reporting Program Adopted and Implemented Changes in Accredited Programs Adopted and Implemented August 7, 2015 Revised Policy on Enrollment Increases in Adopted and Implemented Advanced Dental Specialty Program Adopted and Implemented February 5, 2016 Revised Accreditation Status Definition Adopted and Implemented Implemented February 5, 2016 Revised Policy on Program Changes Revised Policy on Enrollment Increases in February 5, 2016 Advanced Dental Specialty Programs Accreditation Standards for Advanced July 1, 2016 Specialty Education Programs in Prosthodontics August 5, 2016 Revised Policy on Program Changes Adopted and Implemented August 5, 2016 Revised Policy n Enrollment Increases in Adopted and Advanced Dental Specialty Programs Implemented August 5, 2016 Revised Standard 6, Research Adopted
    [Show full text]
  • ADEX DENTAL EXAM SERIES: Fixed Prosthodontics and Endodontics
    Developed by: Administered by: The American Board of The Commission on Dental Dental Examiners Competency Assessments ADEX DENTAL EXAM SERIES: Fixed Prosthodontics and Endodontics 2019 CANDIDATE MANUAL Please read all pertinent manuals in detail prior to attending the examination Copyright © 2018 American Board of Dental Examiners Copyright © 2018 The Commission on Dental Competency Assessments Ver 1.1- 2019 Exam Cycle Table of Contents Examination and Manual Overview 2 I. Examination Overview A. Manikin Exam Available Formats 4 B. Manikin Exam Parts 4 C. Endodontic and Prosthodontic Typodonts and Instruments 5 D. Examination Schedule Guidelines 6 1. Dates & Sites 6 2. Timely Arrival 6 E. General Manikin-Based Exam Administration Flow 7 1. Before the Exam: Candidate Orientation 7 2. Exam Day: Sample Schedule 7 3. Exam Day: Candidate Flow 8 F. Scoring Overview and Scoring Content 11 1. Section II. Endodontics Content 12 2. Section III. Fixed Prosthodontics Content 12 G. Penalties 13 II. Standards of Conduct and Infection Control A. Standards of Conduct 15 B. Infection Control Requirements 16 III. Examination Content and Criteria A. Endodontics Examination Procedures 19 B. Prosthodontics Examination Procedures 20 C. Endodontics Criteria 1. Anterior Endodontics Criteria 23 2. Posterior Endodontics Criteria 25 D. Prosthodontics Criteria 1. PFM Crown Preparation 27 2. Cast Metal Crown Preparation 29 3. Ceramic Crown Preparation 31 IV. Examination Forms A. Progress Form 34 See the Registration and DSE OSCE Manual for: • Candidate profile creation and registration • Online exam application process • DSE OSCE registration process and examination information / Prometric scheduling processes • ADEX Dental Examination Rules, Scoring, and Re-test processes 1 EXAMINATION AND MANUAL OVERVIEW The CDCA administers the ADEX dental licensure examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of a Periodontic-Endodontic Lesion in a Patient with Aggressive Periodontitis
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Case Reports in Dentistry Volume 2016, Article ID 7080781, 9 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7080781 Case Report Treatment of a Periodontic-Endodontic Lesion in a Patient with Aggressive Periodontitis Mina D. Fahmy,1 Paul G. Luepke,1 Mohamed S. Ibrahim,1,2 and Arndt Guentsch1,3 1 Department of Surgical Sciences, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA 2Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt 3Center of Dental Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, An der Alten Post 4, 07743 Jena, Germany Correspondence should be addressed to Arndt Guentsch; [email protected] Received 7 March 2016; Revised 14 May 2016; Accepted 23 May 2016 Academic Editor: Stefan-Ioan Stratul Copyright © 2016 Mina D. Fahmy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Case Description. This case report describes the successful management of a left mandibular first molar with acombined periodontic-endodontic lesion in a 35-year-old Caucasian woman with aggressive periodontitis using a concerted approach including endodontic treatment, periodontal therapy, and a periodontal regenerative procedure using an enamel matrix derivate. In spite of anticipated poor prognosis, the tooth lesion healed. This seca report also discusses the rationale behind different treatment interventions. Practical Implication. Periodontic-endodontic lesions can be successfully treated if dental professionals follow a concerted treatment protocol that integrates endodontic and periodontic specialties. General dentists can be the gatekeepers in managing these cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Statement – Implants
    Distribution Information AAE members may reprint this position statement for distribution to patients or referring dentists. Implants AAE Position Statement About This Document The following statement was Introduction prepared by the AAE Special The American Association of Endodontists has as its mission the fostering of Committee on Implants. excellence in endodontics and the highest standard of patient care. Our vision is to be a global resource in endodontic knowledge for the profession and the public. ©2007 Dentists and their patients have many alternative treatments available to preserve or replace diseased teeth. In the case of teeth with irreversible pulpal disease, endodontic therapy is a highly predictable method to retain teeth that otherwise would have been extracted. Many large studies show retention rates of more than 90 percent [1, 2]. Alternatively, extracted teeth may be replaced with implants [3-6]. Considerable progress has been made in restoring oral function for patients, but considerably less progress has been made in identifying the best strategies for selecting one treatment approach over another [7, 8], and accordingly, no guidelines set forth by the dental profession regarding endodontic versus implant therapy currently exist. This statement is intended to offer the AAE’s position on this issue. Treatment Planning Based on the Best Evidence Produces Ethical and Effective Results Although there is a lack of clinical trials that directly compare one treatment approach to another [7, 8], there are generally accepted guidelines for the ethical consideration of treatment planning and informed consent. These ethical guidelines provide a framework for all clinical decisions. Quality dental care can only be provided when treatment planning decisions are made by both the dentist and the patient, based on the patient’s general health status and specific oral health needs [9, 10].
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Implants Placement of Dental Implants Is a Procedure, Not an American Dental Association (ADA) Recognized Dental Specialty
    Dental Implants Placement of dental implants is a procedure, not an American Dental Association (ADA) recognized Dental Specialty. Dental implants like all dental procedures require dental education and training. Implant therapy is a prosthodontic procedure with radiographic and surgical components. Using a dental implant to replace missing teeth is dictated by individual patient needs as determined by their dentist. An implant is a device approved and regulated by the FDA, which can provide support for a single missing tooth, multiple missing teeth, or all teeth in the mouth. The prosthodontic and the surgical part of implant care can each range from straightforward to complex. A General Dentist who is trained to place and restore implants may be the appropriate practitioner to provide care for dental implant procedures. This will vary depending on an individual clinician’s amount of training and experience. However, the General Dentist should know when care should be referred to a specialist (a Prosthodontist, a Periodontist or an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon). Practitioners should not try to provide care beyond their level of competence. Orthodontists may place and use implants to enable enhanced tooth movement. Some Endodontists may place an implant when a tooth can’t be successfully treated using endodontic therapy. Maxillofacial Prosthodontists may place special implants or refer for placement when facial tissues are missing and implants are needed to retain a prosthesis. General Dentists are experienced in restorative procedures, and many have been trained and know requirements for the dental implant restorations they provide. However, if a patient’s implant surgical procedure is beyond the usual practice of a dentist, this part of the care should be referred to another dentist that is competent in placement of implants.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of Crowns and Bridges, Pan South London – Practical Study Day 11Th June 2015 EBD
    Peter Briggs BDS(Hons) MSc MRD FDS RCS (Eng) Consultant in Restorative and Implant Dentistry, QMUL and Specialist Practitioner, Hodsoll House Dentistry. Performance of Crowns and Bridges, Pan South London – Practical Study Day 11th June 2015 EBD Experience Patient Evidence Needs Has the recent focus on direct and indirect adhesive dentistry and Dahl concept compounded our indecision when planning conventional crowns and bridges and being confident to prepare teeth well? Aesthetic restorations looking good comes at a biological price DBC prep = 63% off tooth PFM prep = 72% off tooth PFM prep 20% > FGC prep PFM prep x5 > Porcelain veneer (feathered) x3 > Porcelain veneer (butt joint) Edelhoff & Sorensen (2002). Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent; 87: 503-9 Edelhoff & Sorensen (2002). Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 22: 241–249 The problem is if you do something rarely – unless you have got ‘god-given’ talent or are lucky – when you need to do it you will not be able to execute it well Different types of failure Direct survives less well than indirect It’s about what options we have on failure and failure cycling It is being able to identify: • Do I need conventional luting or can I utilise resin bonding • What material will work best: aesthetically, functionally & cost? • What do I need to do to make it work well? I will struggle here with moisture control – conventional cementation
    [Show full text]
  • Asepsis in Operative Dentistry and Endodontics
    International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS) Vol.3, No.1, March 2014, pp. 1~6 ISSN: 2252-8806 1 Asepsis in Operative Dentistry and Endodontics Priyanka Sriraman, Prasanna Neelakantan Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University, Chennai, India Article Info ABSTRACT Article history: Operative (conservative) dentistry and endodontics are specialties of dentistry where the operator is exposed to various infectious agents either via Received Dec 6, 2013 contact with infected tissues, fluids or aerosol. The potential for cross Revised Jan 20, 2014 infection to happen at the dental office is great and every dentist must have a Accepted Feb 26, 2014 thorough knowledge of the concepts of sterilization and disinfection. Disposables should be used wherever possible. Furthermore, the water supply to the dental chair units and water outlets can house biofilms of Keyword: microbes and should be considered as possible sources of infection. This review discusses the importance of following strict aseptic protocols from the Disinfection perspective of operative dentistry and endodontics. Sterilization Cross infection Prions Barrier Copyright © 2014 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. Biofilms All rights reserved. Infection control Corresponding Author: Prasanna Neelakantan, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha University, 162 Poonamallee High Road, Velappanchavadi, Chennai - 600077, Tamil Nadu, India. Email; [email protected] 1. INTRODUCTION Dental professionals are exposed to a variety of micro-organisms present in the blood and saliva of patients, making infection control an issue of utmost importance. Asepsis is the state of being free from disease causing contaminants such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, parasites in addition to preventing contact with micro-organisms. The main goal of infection control is either to reduce or eliminate the chances of microbes getting transferred between the patients, doctors and the dental auxiliaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Apicoectomy of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Through a Piezoelectric Bony-Window Osteotomy: Two Case Reports Introducing a New Technique to Preserve Cortical Bone
    Case report ISSN 2234-7658 (print) / ISSN 2234-7666 (online) https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.4.310 Apicoectomy of maxillary anterior teeth through a piezoelectric bony-window osteotomy: two case reports introducing a new technique to preserve cortical bone Viola Hirsch1,2, Meetu Two case reports describing a new technique of creating a repositionable piezoelectric R. Kohli1*, Syngcuk bony window osteotomy during apicoectomy in order to preserve bone and act as an 1 autologous graft for the surgical site are described. Endodontic microsurgery of anterior Kim teeth with an intact cortical plate and large periapical lesion generally involves removal of a significant amount of healthy bone in order to enucleate the diseased 1 Department of Endodontics, tissue and manage root ends. In the reported cases, apicoectomy was performed on the University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, lateral incisors of two patients. A piezoelectric device was used to create and elevate PA, USA a bony window at the surgical site, instead of drilling and destroying bone while 2Private Practice, Munich, Germany making an osteotomy with conventional burs. Routine microsurgical procedures - lesion enucleation, root-end resection, and filling - were carried out through this window preparation. The bony window was repositioned to the original site and the soft tissue sutured. The cases were re-evaluated clinically and radiographically after a period of 12 - 24 months. At follow-up, radiographic healing was observed. No additional grafting material was needed despite the extent of the lesions. The indication for this procedure is when teeth present with an intact or near-intact buccal cortical plate and a large apical lesion to preserve the bone and use it as an autologous graft.
    [Show full text]
  • Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics
    UPFRONT Experts set top priorities for oral health research Dental health professionals, members of the public, patients, and carers • How can access to dental services be improved for people with have for the first time worked together to identify the most pressing additional needs? unanswered research questions on how to improve oral and dental • How can dental health professionals work with other health health for individual patients, communities and the population. professionals to help improve oral health? In 2017, a partnership between the National Institute for Health • How can basic oral hygiene be achieved for people with Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network Oral and Dental additional care needs? Health Specialty Group in collaboration with the Dental Schools • How to improve communication between dental teams and Council and Public Health England (PHE) was launched to identify patients/carers? unanswered questions relating to oral and dental health research • Is there a role for dental health professionals in treating oral from a patient, public and clinical perspective. health problems to improve general health? The work has taken 18 months to complete and identified gaps in • What is the best way to prevent gum disease, and reduce oral knowledge about oral and dental care using a method tested by the health inequalities at a community or population level? James Lind Alliance, the non-profit making initiative established • What role do digital technologies play in the provision of dental to bring patients, carers and clinicians
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Osseointegration: a Review
    IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry 2021;7(1):29–36 Content available at: https://www.ipinnovative.com/open-access-journals IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Journal homepage: https://www.ipinnovative.com/journals/APRD Review Article A brief history of osseointegration: A review Myla Ramakrishna1,*, Sudheer Arunachalam1, Y Ramesh Babu1, Lalitha Srivalli2, L Srikanth1, Sudeepti Soni3 1Dept. of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sree Sai Dental College & Research Institute, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India 2National Institute for Mentally Handicapped, NIEPID, Secunderbad, Telangana, India 3Dept. of Prosthodontic, Crown and Bridge, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India ARTICLEINFO ABSTRACT Article history: Background: osseointegration of dental implants refers to direct structural and functional link between Received 11-01-2021 living bone and the surface of non-natural implants. It follows bonding up of an implant into jaw bone Accepted 22-02-2021 when bone cells fasten themselves directly onto the titanium surface.it is the most investigated area in Available online 26-02-2021 implantology in recent times. Evidence based data revels that osseointegrated implants are predictable and highly successful. This process is relatively complex and is influenced by various factors in formation of bone neighbouring implant surface. Keywords: Osseointegration © This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Implant License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and Bone reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 1. Introduction 1.1. History Missing teeth and there various attempts to replace them has An investigational work was carried out in Sweden by presented a treatment challenge throughout human history.
    [Show full text]