DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Resource Condition Assessment: Timpanogos Cave National Monument

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural Resource Condition Assessment: Timpanogos Cave National Monument National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Condition Assessment Timpanogos Cave National Monument Natural Resource Report NPS/TICA/NRR—2020/2188 The production of this document cost $59,933, including costs associated with data collection, processing, analysis, and subsequent authoring, editing, and publication. ON THIS PAGE American Fork Canyon in fall. (NPS). ON THE COVER The formation on the right side of this photo, called flowstone, was made over thousands of years by flowing water carrying dissolved mineral. The flow of the water caused this formation to look very much like a frozen waterfall. (NPS). Natural Resource Condition Assessment Timpanogos Cave National Monument Natural Resource Report NPS/TICA/NRR—2020/2188 Catherin A Schwemm1, Donna Shorrock2 1Institute for Wildlife Studies PO Box 1104 Arcata, CA 95518 2National Park Service Intermountain Region Office 12795 West Alameda Parkway Denver, CO 80228 November 2020 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review, which was provided by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. The level and extent of peer review was based on the importance of report content or its potentially controversial or precedent-setting nature. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available in digital format from the Natural Resource Condition Assessment Program website and the Natural Resource Publications Management website. If you have difficulty accessing information in this publication, particularly if using assistive technology, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Schwemm, C. A., and D. Shorrock. 2020. Natural resource condition assessment: Timpanogos Cave National Monument. Natural Resource Report NPS/TICA/NRR—2020/2188. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.36967/nrr-2279634. NPS 153/173822, November 2020 ii Contents Page Figures................................................................................................................................................... xi Tables ..................................................................................................................................................xiii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. xv Prologue ............................................................................................................................................. xvii Chapter 2. Park Resource Setting/Resource Stewardship Context ........................................................ 3 2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 2.1.1. Enabling Legislation/Administrative History .................................................................. 4 2.1.2. Geographic Location and Physical Setting ...................................................................... 5 2.1.3. Cultural History and Significance ................................................................................... 5 2.1.4. Visitation ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Physical Resources and Processes ........................................................................................... 6 2.2.1. Climate ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.2. Geology ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.3. Soils ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2.4. Hydrology and Water Quality ......................................................................................... 7 2.2.5. Fire ................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3. Natural Resources .................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.1. Vegetation Communities ................................................................................................. 8 2.3.2. Threatened/Endangered Species .................................................................................... 10 2.3.3. Species and Communities of Concern ........................................................................... 10 2.3.4. Non-biologic Resources of Concern ............................................................................. 11 2.4. Relevant Regional and Landscape-scale Information ........................................................... 13 2.5. Primary Threats to Natural Resources ................................................................................... 13 2.5.1. Climate Change ............................................................................................................. 13 2.5.2. Adjacent Land Use ........................................................................................................ 13 2.5.3. Visitor Use ..................................................................................................................... 13 iii Contents (continued) Page 2.5.4. Cave Lights .................................................................................................................... 13 2.5.5. Non-native/Invasive Species ......................................................................................... 13 2.6. Resource Stewardship ........................................................................................................... 14 2.6.1. Management Directives, Planning Guidance and Research .......................................... 14 2.6.2. Supporting Science ........................................................................................................ 15 2.7. Literature Cited ...................................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 3. Study Approach .................................................................................................................. 21 3.1. Preliminary Scoping .............................................................................................................. 21 3.1.1. Targeted Investigation Topic – Cave Watershed .......................................................... 21 3.2. Study Design ......................................................................................................................... 23 3.2.1. Indicator Framework, Study Resources and Indicators ................................................. 23 3.2.2. General Approach and Methods .................................................................................... 23 3.2.3. Components Included in Each Analysis ........................................................................ 23 3.2.4. Project Challenges ......................................................................................................... 24 3.2.4 Condition Reporting Symbols ........................................................................................ 24 3.2.5. Project Challenges ......................................................................................................... 25 3.3. References ............................................................................................................................. 26 Chapter 4. Natural Resource Conditions.............................................................................................. 27 4.1. Air Quality ............................................................................................................................. 27 4.1.1. Background...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Complete Meeting Packet
    PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE Nevada Land Management Task Force (Established Pursuant to Assembly Bill 227 enacted in the 2013 Legislative Session) August 16, 2013, 1:00 p.m. Eureka Opera House 31 S. Main St. Eureka, NV 89316 AGENDA Some Task Force members may attend via telephone from other locations. Items on the agenda may be taken out of order. The Task Force may combine two or more agenda items for consideration. The Task Force may remove an item from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item on the agenda at any time. Call to Order, Roll Call 1. Public Comment. Please Limit Comments to 3 Minutes 2. Approval of Agenda. For Possible Action. 3. Approval of the Minutes of the June 28, 2013 Meeting of the Nevada Land Management Task Force. For Possible Action. (Attachment) 4. Overview of Legislation in Other Western States Regarding the Transfer of Public Lands. 5. Presentation on Studies Commissioned by Eureka County in 1994 and 1996 on Public Lands Transfer Issues. 6. Initial Discussion on Potential Lands to be Included in a Transfer of Public Lands from the Federal Government to Nevada. (Attachment) 7. Initial Discussion of Cost and Revenue Implications of the Transfer of Public Lands to Nevada. (Attachment) 8. Initial Discussion on Transferring Multiple Uses, Including but not Limited to Outdoor Recreation, Mining and Prospecting, Timber, Grazing, and Fish and Wildlife Purposes, with the Transfer of Public Lands. 9. Initial Discussion on Which Public Lands, if Transferred to State Ownership, Should be Sold or Exchanged into the Private Sector and How Should the Sales Take Place? 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Uinta NF Ranger Stations
    United States Department of Agriculture The Enchantment of Forest Service Intermountain Region Ranger Life in the Hills UINTA NATIONAL FOREST JULY 2016 Administrative Facilities of the Uinta National Forest, 1905-1965 Historic Context & Evaluations Forest Service Report No. UWC-16-1328 Cover: Lake Creek Ranger Station, 1949 Pleasant Grove Ranger Station, 1965 “I had a carpenter hired and boarded up the house around the foundation. It was from 6 in. to 2 feet off the ground and skunks and animals frequently got under the house, which detracted some of the enchantment of Ranger Life in the Hills.” Aaron Parley Christiansen, April 26, 1919 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
    [Show full text]
  • January 19, 2018 Objection Reviewing Officer USDA-Forest
    Board of Directors January 19, 2018 Gary Macfarlane, ID Objection Reviewing Officer President USDA-Forest Service Intermountain Region Franz Camenzind, WY 324 25th Street Vice-President Ogden, UT 84401 Marty Almquist, MT Objection Submitted Electronically: objections-intermtn-regional- Secretary-Treasurer [email protected] Talasi Brooks, ID RE: Objection on Helicopter Landings in The Twin Peaks, Lone Peak, Louise Lasley, NM and Mount Timpanogos Wilderness Areas to Capture and Collar Mountain Cyndi Tuell, AZ Goats and Bighorn Sheep Project René Voss, CA Dear Objection Reviewing Officer, Please accept the below objection regarding the Forest Service’s Senior Advisor draft Decision Notice (“DN”) and Environmental Assessment (“EA”) for the Stewart M. Brandborg “Helicopter landings in the Twin Peaks, Lone Peak, and Mount Timpanogos wilderness areas to capture and collar mountain goats and bighorn sheep Executive Director project.” The responsible official for this project is David Whittekiend, George Nickas Forest Supervisor of the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Wilderness Watch is a national wilderness advocacy organization, Advisory Council headquartered in Missoula, Montana, dedicated to the protection and proper Magalen Bryant administration of the National Wilderness Preservation System. Wilderness Dr. Derek Craighead Watch members use and will continue to use the Twin Peaks, Lone Peak, Dr. M. Rupert Cutler and Mount Timpanogos Wildernesses for outdoor recreation and professional pursuits, including hiking, wildlife viewing, and wildlife study. Dr. Roderick Nash As more fully described below, the Forest Service’s proposed action would adversely affect Wilderness Watch’s organizational interests, as well as its Minneapolis, MN Office members’ use and enjoyment of these wildernesses. 2833 43rd Avenue South Western Wildlife Conservancy is a 501(c)3 organization founded in Minneapolis, MN 55406 Salt Lake City, Utah in 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Forest Insect and Disease Conditons Report 2002-2004
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Quinney Natural Resources Research Library, The Bark Beetles, Fuels, and Fire Bibliography S.J. and Jessie E. 2005 Utah Forest Insect and Disease Conditons Report 2002-2004 K Matthews V DeBlander L Pederson P Mocettini D Halsey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/barkbeetles Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, Forest Biology Commons, Forest Management Commons, and the Wood Science and Pulp, Paper Technology Commons Recommended Citation Matthews, K., DeBlander, V., Pederson, L., Mocettini, P. and Halsey, D. (2005). Utah forest insect and disease conditons report 2002-2004. USDA Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, Forest Health Protection, Intermountain Region, R4-OFO-TR-05012, 58 pp. This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Quinney Natural Resources Research Library, S.J. and Jessie E. at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Bark Beetles, Fuels, and Fire Bibliography by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Utah State and Private Forestry Forest Health Forest Insect and Disease Protection Intermountain Region Conditions Report R4-OFO-TR-05-12 2002 - 2004 State of Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands Butterfly Lake, Mirror Lake Highway Darren Blackford, USFS. FOREST HEALTH SPECIALISTS Forest Health Protection
    [Show full text]
  • Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Citation Information Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado School of Law 401 UCB Boulder, Colorado 80309-0401 2004 Table of Contents SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION ........................................................... 1 I. Overview ................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Specific Special Use Provisions............................................................................................. 1 A. Water Rights ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Utah Interagency Fire Center
    NORTHERN UTAH INTERAGENCY FIRE CENTER INITIAL ATTACK RUN CARDS 2020 Version: March 23, 2020 Northern Utah Interagency Run Cards, 2020 Effective June 1 through October 1. Notifications will occur at any time of year. The Interagency Run Cards are developed by a group of interagency representatives to provide guidance to the Northern Utah Interagency Fire Center (NUIFC) for initial attack dispatching of wildland fire suppression resources within a pre-identified geographic areas (run card zones). The run cards are used when there is a new smoke reported and doesn’t meet the discretionary smoke report criteria. When a NWCG qualified Incident Commander is on scene of the fire, they may adjust the pre- established initial attack response as identified on the run card by cancelling resources currently en-route (or about to be dispatched) or ordering additional resources. Discretionary Smoke Reports: If any of the following smoke reports are received, the appropriate Duty Officer will need to be contacted to determine the response. During periods of large/multiple fire activity, when there are not enough resources to fill the run cards, the Duty Officers from FF&SL, USFS and BLM will be available to NUIFC to assist in initial attack incident prioritization. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Report Abandoned Campfires, when clearly stated that it is still within the ring Duty Officers may only make an adjustment to the Run Card after gathering Situational Awareness/Intelligence from current responding resources. This should be a rare augmentation to the pre-established Run Card response. After Hours Dispatch Procedures: BLM: After resource duty hours, dispatchers will contact the BLM Duty Officer who will determine the level of response for BLM fires.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Areas on the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National
    Wilderness Areas On The Uinta‐Wasatch‐Cache National Forests “Wilderness is the land that was wild land beyond the frontier...land that shaped the growth of our nation and the character of its people. Wilderness is the land that is rare, wild places where one can retreat from civilization, reconnect with the Earth, and find healing, meaning and significance.” The United States was the first country to define and create designated wilderness areas. In 1964 the Wilderness Act was passed in congress. The Act describes wilderness as the following: "...lands designated for preservation and protection in their natural condition..." Section 2(a) "...an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man..." Section 2(c) "...an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its primeval character and influence, without permanent improvement or human habitation..." Section 2(c) "...generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man's work substantially unnoticeable..." Section 2(c) "...has outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation..." Section 2(c) "...shall be devoted to the public purposes of recreation, scenic, scientific, educational, conservation and historic use." Section 4(b) Within the Uinta‐Wasatch‐Cache National Forest there are 9 designated wilderness areas. These areas include: Mount Naomi Wilderness, Wellsville Mountain Wilderness, Mount Olympus Wilderness, Twin Peaks Wilderness, Lone Peak Wilderness, Mount Timpanogos Wilderness, Mount Nebo Wilderness, Deseret Peak Wilderness and the High Uinta Wilderness. Each of these areas offer unique wilderness opportunities and experiences. The Mount Naomi Wilderness was designated in 1984 and includes 44,523 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Is Where Civilization Meets the “Wild.” Metropolitan Areas and Get to Know Us
    inta-Wasatch-Cache NATIONAL FOREST U VISITOR GUIDE The Forest Next Door Logan River (© Mike Norton) Nebo Loop Road (© Willie Holdman) What’s Inside he Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest is where civilization meets the “wild.” Metropolitan areas and Get»to»Know»Us»......................... 2 Tcommunities bordering the forest make up some of the Special»Places»...........................3 fastest growing areas in the Intermountain West. Quick, Scenic»Byways»&»Backways»......4 convenient access is available to forest visitors year-round, Wilderness».................................6 Activities».................................... 8 making the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache an intensely used Hiking».......................................»10 destination spanning backyard to backcountry. Roads and Winter»Recreation....................»12 trails lead visitors to natural settings and spectacular vistas Flora»&»Fauna»..........................»14 with fresh water and clean air. Know»Before»You»Go.................16 Campgrounds»&»Picnic»Areas...18 In winter, the “Greatest Snow on Fast Forest Facts Maps»........................................»24 Earth” draws people from around Contact»Information»................»28 »» Size:»2.1»million»acres,»from» the world. desert»to»high»mountain»peaks.» »» The»oldest»exposed»rocks»in»Utah» can»be»seen»in»outcrops»near»the» mouth»of»Farmington»Canyon.» orest lands have sustained local communities »» The»Jardine»Juniper»tree»is»over» for thousands of years. We recognize our role in 1,500»years»old»and»is»one»of»the» F finding balance and maintaining relevance, while oldest»living»trees»in»the»Rocky» Mountains. providing sustainable recreation for a diverse and growing population. This Visitor Guide provides the information you need to make the most of your Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest experience. G et to Know Us History s “The Forest Next Door,” the Uinta-Wasatch- y the1890s many of the range and timber resources of ACache National Forest has long been sought after for its Bthe Uinta and Wasatch Mountains were seriously depleted.
    [Show full text]
  • Cottonwood Canyons Scenic Byways Corridor Management Plan Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan 2008
    Little Cottonwood Canyon Big Cottonwood Canyon Scenic Byway Scenic Byway Cottonwood Canyons Scenic Byways Corridor Management Plan Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan 2008 Project Team: Carol Majeske, US Forest Service Claire Runge, Town of Alta Barbara Cameron, Big Cottonwood Canyon Community Council Laura McIndoe Briefer, Salt Lake City Public Utilities Ritchie Taylor, Utah Department of Transportation Peter Jager, Utah Department of Transportation Prepared for: Cottonwood Canyons Scenic Byways Committee Prepared by: Fehr & Peers 2180 South 1300 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 p 801.463.7600 MGB+A 145 West 200 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 p 801.364.9696 HW Lochner 310 East 4500 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84107 p 801.262.8700 ADOPTED DECEMBER 2008 Page 2 Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Travel Conditions along the Byways 9 3 Intrinsic Qualities 19 4 Byway Issues 27 5 Vision 31 6 Goals and Strategies 33 7 Byway Specific Plans 37 8 Implementation 65 Cottonwood Canyons Interpretive Plan Page 3 Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan Page 3 x Page 4 Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan Chapter 1 : Introduction A Corridor Management Plan is a written plan developed by the communities and stakeholders in a byway area that outlines how to define and enhance the byway’s intrinsic qualities and character. Utah is a state of contrast, where red rock gorges meet snow capped peaks. Among the most scenic and visited locations in the state, the Wasatch Mountains in northern Utah are a collection of special places that draw residents and visitors in quantity.
    [Show full text]
  • CWNCRA 10-27-2020 Commission Review Draft
    10/27/2020 PUBLIC DISCUSSION DRAFT H.R. ____ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES XXX, 2021 Rep. introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources A BILL To create new lands designations, a new land management plan for those designations for lands in Utah, and for other purposes. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives 2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 4 (a) SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the “Central 5 Wasatch National Conservation and Recreation Area 6 Act”. 7 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of 8 this Act is as follows: 9 Sec. 1. Short Title; Table of Contents. 10 Sec. 2. Definitions. 11 Sec. 3. Central Wasatch National Conservation and Recreation Area. 12 Sec. 4. Wilderness. 13 Sec. 5. White Pine Watershed Protection Area. 14 Sec. 6. General Provisions. 15 . 1 10/27/2020 PUBLIC DISCUSSION DRAFT 16 Sec. 7. Authorization for Appropriations. 17 SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS. 18 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 19 (1) CONSERVATION AND RECREATION AREA.— 20 The term “Conservation and Recreation Area” means 21 the Central Wasatch National Conservation and 22 Recreation Area established by section 3(a). 23 (2) CONSERVATION AND RECREATION AREA 24 MAP.—The term “Conservation and Recreation Area 25 map” means the map entitled “Proposed Central 26 Wasatch National Conservation and Recreation Area 27 Map” and dated ___, 20__. 28 (3) FACILITY.—The term “Facility” includes 29 systems for water resources, flood control, electric 30 energy, telecommunications, pipelines, and 31 recreation, including parking areas, trailheads, and 32 restrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1480 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1113 (Pub
    § 1113 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1480 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 13, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation § 1113. Authorization of appropriations System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- There are hereby authorized to be appro- priations be available for additional personnel priated to the Department of the Interior with- stated as being required solely for the purpose of out fiscal year limitation such sums as may be managing or administering areas solely because necessary for the purposes of this chapter and they are included within the National Wilder- the agreement with the Government of Canada ness Preservation System. signed January 22, 1964, article 11 of which pro- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined vides that the Governments of the United States A wilderness, in contrast with those areas and Canada shall share equally the costs of de- where man and his own works dominate the veloping and the annual cost of operating and landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where maintaining the Roosevelt Campobello Inter- the earth and its community of life are un- national Park. trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- (Pub. L. 88–363, § 14, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness is further defined to mean in this chapter an CHAPTER 23—NATIONAL WILDERNESS area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its PRESERVATION SYSTEM primeval character and influence, without per- manent improvements or human habitation, Sec. which is protected and managed so as to pre- 1131.
    [Show full text]