Reconnaissance Geology of Admiralty Island Alaska

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reconnaissance Geology of Admiralty Island Alaska Reconnaissance Geology of Admiralty Island Alaska LI By E. H. LATHRAM, J. S. POMEROY, H. C. BERG, and R. A. LONEY ^CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN 1181-R ^ A reconnaissance study of a geologically -t complex* area in southeast-..--.. Alaska.... UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary X1 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director Y. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract_____________________---_-__-_-__--__-_ _..___.__ Rl Introduction... _______ __-_____-_---_-_ __________ ______ 2 M Geography______________---__---___-_-__--_-_---_ ________ 2 ;._. Previous investigations---..-. ________________________________ 4 Present investigations..-______-_--__ _ ____________________ 6 ^ Tectonic aspects of the geology__-_-__--_--__-_-_______._____.____ 7 Stratigraphy...... _____-___-__--_^---^---^ ----------------------- 10 "-< Silurian(?) rocks_________ . _ 10 Devonian and Devonian(?) rocks--___________-___-______________ 10 J Retreat Group and Gambier Bay Formation___-____-_._ __ 10 ^ Hood Bay Formation..... ............'............ 13 Permian rocks..___-----------------------------------------_-- 14 4 Cannery Formation...__________ _________________________ 14 Pybus Dolomite____---_-_-_-_---_---_---_--__ __________ 16 '>* Undifferentiated Permian and Triassic rocks._____________________ 17 Triassic rocks.__-______________---_---_-_-_---_-----_-________ 18 Hyd Formation._________-__---__-_---_-_-___-__-__-_-____ 18 ; Jurassic and Cretaceous rocks_-__---_---_--__-_--_____--_____._- 22 N Stephens Passage Group__________________________________ 22 Seymour Canal Formation_________-_-_---_-_-____________ 24 Douglas Island Volcanics----------------------------------- 27 y Brothers Volcanics _______________-_-__--_-_-__-.___-____ 28 Tertiary rocks___.._.___.___._-.-___.___._.-__________.______ 28 > Kootznahoo Formation...___-___-___-________-___-__--___-_ 28 Admiralty Island Volcanics------------------------ ____-. 31 Quaternary sedimentary depositS-_____-_-_-___---_-___-_-_-_____ 33 Undifferentiated metamorphic rocks__---____--____-___-______- 33 ,"*' Migmatite, gneiss, and feldspathic schist_________________________ 34 Plutonic rocks_________________-____-_____-___-___-___-_-_-. 35 Felsic plutonic rocks-___-------------_------_-------.---_-- 35 ,-y Intermediate plutonic rocks..____-_-__-___-__-____-________. 35 Mafic and ultramafic plutonic rocks__--_--__--_-_-_-__-___. 36 4 Structural geology._____________-___--______-------_-_-__---___---. 37 Admiralty anticlinorium_____ ___________________________________ 37 Juneau synclinorium.___________----_______-_-___-__--___-_-_-. 38 Tertiary basins.-____________-__-_____--_-_-_---_-_-_---_-_____ 38 ^ Faults .._____.____.___._________________. 39 Age of folding, faulting, and plutonism--_____________________________ 40 Glaciation and changes in sea level-_-_---_-___---------------------- 42 j Economic geology__-__-_-___-_-_-_-_-_--_--_--_------------_---__- 43 Selected references.._______________-____.---_-___-___--___--_---___ 46 * ni A H t IV CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates are In pocket] PLATE 1. Geologic maps of Admiralty Island and Kootznahoo Inlet area, Alaska. 2. Map and chart of mineral and fossil occurrences on Admiralty Island, Alaska. Page FIGTJBE 1. Index map showing location of Admiralty Island, Alaska. __ _. R5 2. Distribution of formations of the Stephens Passage Group.___ 22 TABLES Page j». TABLE 1. Summary of stratigraphic units on Admiralty Island.__ _ R9 2. Results of X-ray spectroscopic examination of sulfide, oxide, and 7 rare earth mineral-bearing samples.__-____--..____.______ 44 x V- v y- X CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY By E. H. LATHRAM, J. S. POMEROY, H. C. BERG, and R. A. LONEY ABSTRACT Admiralty Island, one of the major islands of the Alexander Archipelago, lies adjacent to the Alaskan mainland south of Juneau. Silurian (?) to Quaternary sedimentary, metamorphic and igneous rocks crop out in the largely uninhabited, moderately rugged area. The layered rocks of Admiralty Island comprise six depositional sequences, five of marine (eugeosynclinal) and one of nonmarine origin, each separated .by unconformities. Graywacke, slate, and limestone of Silurian (?) age are the oldest sequence. Schist and marble, representing metamorphosed graywacke, siltstone, limestone, and volcanic rocks, form the Retreat Group and the Gambier Bay Formation. These rocks, together with the apparently coeval unmetamor- phosed black argillite and chert of the Hood Bay Formation, make up the next younger sequence (Devonian and Devonian(?)), which is of unknown thickness. The Cannery Formation, consisting of more than 2,000 feet of graywacke, agril- lite, chert, and conglomerate, and the overlying Pybus Dolomite, as much as 1,000 feet thick, form the next younger sequence (Permian). The Hyd Formation (Triassic), composed of thin-bedded impure limestone, black chert, and black slate interflngering with and overlain by basalt and andesite pillow flows, forma the fourth sequence. The fifth sequence, the Stephens Passage Group (Jurassic and Cretaceous) is more than 5,000 feet thick; it comprises the Seymour Canal Formation, composed of slate, graywacke, and conglomerate, the Douglas Island Volcanics, which includes augite-bearing andesitic and basaltic flow breccia, and the Brothers Volcanics flow breccia. The formations of the fifth sequence are equivalent in age and intertongue along Seymour Canal and Stephens Passage. The youngest sequence is nonmarine, late Paleocene through Miocene in age, and includes the Kootznahoo Formation, composed of about 5,000 feet of con­ glomerate, sandstone, siltstone, shale, and coal, and the overlying Admiralty Island Volcanics, which consists of basaltic andesite flows more than 10,000 feet thick. A major orogeny, post-earliest Early Cretaceous to pre-Paleocene in age, prob­ ably culminated in middle-Cretaceous time and formed the major structural fea­ tures of the Island. These are the Admiralty anticlinorium, which forms the central and western part of the island and is a part of the Prince of Wales geanticline, and the adjoining Juneau synclinorium to the east. Folding of at least two stages resulted in superposition of the folds. Most of the folds are overturned those in the anticlinorium largely to the northeast and those in the El R2 CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY synclinorium to the southwest. Earlier deformation may be the reason for dif­ ferences in folding and metamorphic grade observed in the older depositional sequences, but lack of critical exposures has prevented recognition of earlier orogeny. The emplacement of felsic to ultramafic plutonic rocks may have been largely posttectonic, although one pluton, that at Point Retreat, is clearly pre- or syntectonic. Large bodies of contact-metamorphic rocks and migmatite border some of the plutonic masses. Low-grade regional metamorphism accom­ panied the orogeny and affected most of the island, particularly the central and western parts. Faulting along northwest trends, with both vertical and hori­ zontal movement, accompanied and followed the folding. The Tertiary sedi­ mentary rocks were deposited in two unconnected intermontane basins. Al­ though there is no evidence of post-Miocene folding or plutonism, post-Miocene faulting, largely with vertical movement, occurred along north and northeast trends. The area was glaciated to an elevation of about 3,000 feet during Pleistocene time. No glaciers remain at present. Fossiliferous marine beaches at eleva­ tions of 475 feet attest to a higher sea level or a lower elevation of the land surface during Pleistocene time. Metamorphic rocks west of Hasselborg Lake and around Slide Lake contain local concentrations of sulflde and oxide minerals. Aside from intermittent exploration at the Funter Bay nickel-copper deposit, there is currently (1963) little mining activity on the island, although some of the now inactive mines have produced modest amounts of gold and silver. INTRODUCTION GEOGRAPHY Admiralty Island, one of the major islands of the Alexander Archi­ pelago of southeastern Alaska, lies between lat. 57° N. and 58°25' N. and long. 133°50' W. and 135° W. (fig. 1). It trends in a northerly direction, is approximately 96 miles in length, and ranges in width from less than a mile to 30 miles. The northern shore, along Stephens Passage, is 10 miles south of Juneau, the State capital. The island is bounded by Stephens Passage, Frederick Sound, Chatham Strait, and Lynn Canal, all inland waterways. Admiralty Island is shown on parts of three 1:250,000-scale U.S. Geological Survey reconnais­ sance topographic maps the Sitka, Juneau, and Sumdum quadrangles. The population is small, and the few settlements are located on the west coast. The only permanent village is Angoon with a population of about 300. Seasonal settlements are located adjacent to the can­ neries at Hood Bay and Hawk Inlet. As a rule the canneries are closed during the winter. The villages of Funter, Killisnoo, Neltushkin, and Tyee have been abandoned. Admiralty Island is accessible only by airplane or boat. Alaska Coastal-Ellis Airline flights from Juneau or Sitka make daily stops at Hood Bay, Angoon, and Hawk Inlet during the summer. Charter service is needed for other areas. Most of the inlets and bays provide good anchorages for boats; however, utmost care is needed when RECONNAISSANCE GEOLOGY
Recommended publications
  • A Week in Angoon and a Month of Reflection on Xutsnoowú Aaní
    A WEEK IN ANGOON AND A MONTH OF REFLECTION ON XUTSNOOWÚ AANÍ Richard Carstensen Discovery Southeast, Juneau for: Angoon Community Association & USFS Summer, 2012 2 • A week in Angoon CONTENTS Navigating this NAVIGATING THIS DIGITAL JOURNAL ..................................................................... 2 digital journal PLACE-NAME REVOLUTION ......................................................................................3 Try reading this journal on the couch with your iPad in INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................4 Goodreader, or an Android tablet DAILY JOURNAL ..................................................................................5 in ezPDF reader. Colors are spectacular. Beats paper (>$100 20120814 JUNEAU TO ANGOON ................................................................................5 to print in color!), or sitting at a ALASKA SHOREZONE ...........................................................................................19 computer for 6 hours. Annotate your copy with yellow stickies 20120815 EEY TLIEN—XUNYÉI (KOOTZNAHOO‑MITCHELL) ............................ 21 using voice recognition. PLACE NAMES: ANGOON TIDAL LABYRINTH ..................................................... 21 • This pdf is “bookmarked.” On your tablet/smartphone, tap 20120816 KANALKU LAKE ........................................................................................33 any of the chapters in Contents INGNS (IMPORTANT NATIVE GUY NAMES) ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness in Southeastern Alaska: a History
    Wilderness in Southeastern Alaska: A History John Sisk Today, Southeastern Alaska (Southeast) is well known remoteness make it wild in the most definitive sense. as a place of great scenic beauty, abundant wildlife and The Tongass encompasses 109 inventoried roadless fisheries, and coastal wilderness. Vast expanses of areas covering 9.6 million acres (3.9 million hectares), wild, generally undeveloped rainforest and productive and Congress has designated 5.8 million acres (2.3 coastal ecosystems are the foundation of the region’s million hectares) of wilderness in the nation’s largest abundance (Fig 1). To many Southeast Alaskans, (16.8 million acre [6.8 million hectare]) national forest wilderness means undisturbed fish and wildlife habitat, (U.S. Forest Service [USFS] 2003). which in turn translates into food, employment, and The Wilderness Act of 1964 provides a legal business. These wilderness values are realized in definition for wilderness. As an indicator of wild subsistence, sport and commercial fisheries, and many character, the act has ensured the preservation of facets of tourism and outdoor recreation. To Americans federal lands displaying wilderness qualities important more broadly, wilderness takes on a less utilitarian to recreation, science, ecosystem integrity, spiritual value and is often described in terms of its aesthetic or values, opportunities for solitude, and wildlife needs. spiritual significance. Section 2(c) of the Wilderness Act captures the essence of wilderness by identifying specific qualities that make it unique. The provisions suggest wilderness is an area or region characterized by the following conditions (USFS 2002): Section 2(c)(1) …generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man’s work substantially unnoticeable; Section 2(c)(2) …has outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation; Section 2(c)(3) …has at least five thousand acres of land or is of sufficient FIG 1.
    [Show full text]
  • North Pacific Research Board Project Final Report
    NORTH PACIFIC RESEARCH BOARD PROJECT FINAL REPORT Synthesis of Marine Biology and Oceanography of Southeast Alaska NPRB Project 406 Final Report Ginny L. Eckert1, Tom Weingartner2, Lisa Eisner3, Jan Straley4, Gordon Kruse5, and John Piatt6 1 Biology Program, University of Alaska Southeast, and School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 11120 Glacier Hwy., Juneau, AK 99801, (907) 796-6450, [email protected] 2 Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska Fairbanks, P.O. Box 757220, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220, (907) 474-7993, [email protected] 3 Auke Bay Lab, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 17109 Pt. Lena Loop Rd., Juneau, AK 99801, (907) 789-6602, [email protected] 4 University of Alaska Southeast, 1332 Seward Ave., Sitka, AK 99835, (907) 774-7779, [email protected] 5 School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 11120 Glacier Hwy., Juneau, AK 99801, (907) 796-2052, [email protected] 6 Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK, 360-774-0516, [email protected] August 2007 ABSTRACT This project directly responds to NPRB specific project needs, “Bring Southeast Alaska scientific background up to the status of other Alaskan waters by completing a synthesis of biological and oceanographic information”. This project successfully convened a workshop on March 30-31, 2005 at the University of Alaska Southeast to bring together representatives from different marine science disciplines and organizations to synthesize information on the marine biology and oceanography of Southeast Alaska. Thirty-eight individuals participated, including representatives of the University of Alaska and state and national agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Pamphlet to Accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131
    Bedrock Geologic Map of the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, and Accompanying Conodont Data By Alison B. Till, Julie A. Dumoulin, Melanie B. Werdon, and Heather A. Bleick Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131 View of Salmon Lake and the eastern Kigluaik Mountains, central Seward Peninsula 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Sources of data ....................................................................................................................................1 Components of the map and accompanying materials .................................................................1 Geologic Summary ........................................................................................................................................1 Major geologic components ..............................................................................................................1 York terrane ..................................................................................................................................2 Grantley Harbor Fault Zone and contact between the York terrane and the Nome Complex ..........................................................................................................................3 Nome Complex ............................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission
    SALMON-TAGGING EXPERIMENTS IN ALASKA, 1924 AND 1925 1 .:I- By WILLIS H. RICH, Ph. D. Director, U. S. Biological Station, Seattle, Wash; .:I­ CONTENTS Page Introduction _ 109 Experiments in southeastern Alaska__hhu u __nn_h__u u u _ 116 Tagging record _ 116 Returns from experiments in Icy Strait__ n h_u u_..u u _ 119 Returns from experiments in Frederick Sound u huh _ 123 Returns from experiments in Chatham Strait; h u • _ 123 Returns from experiments in Sumner Strait, u_uuu .. u _ 128 Returns from experiments at Cape Muzon and Kaigani Point, ~ _ 135 Returns from experiments at Cape Chacon u n u h _ 137 Returns from experiments near Cape Fox and Duke Islandu _ 141 Variations in returns of tagged fish; h _u u n n h n __ h u_ 143 Conelusions _ 144 Experiments at Port Moller, 1925un__h_uu uu __ 145 INTRODUCTION The extensive salmon-tagging experiments conducted during 1922 and 1923 2 in the region of the Alaska Peninsula proved so productive of information, both of scientific interest and of practical application in the care of these fisheries, that it was considered desirable to undertake similar investigations in other districts; Accordingly, experiments were carried on in southeastern Alaska in 1924 and again in 1925. In 1925, also, at the request of one of the companies engaged in packing salmon in the Port Moller district, along the northern shore of the Alaska Penin­ sula, the work done there in 1922 was repeated. The results of these experiments form the basis for the following report.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Bear (Ursus Arctos) John Schoen and Scott Gende Images by John Schoen
    Brown Bear (Ursus arctos) John Schoen and Scott Gende images by John Schoen Two hundred years ago, brown (also known as grizzly) bears were abundant and widely distributed across western North America from the Mississippi River to the Pacific and from northern Mexico to the Arctic (Trevino and Jonkel 1986). Following settlement of the west, brown bear populations south of Canada declined significantly and now occupy only a fraction of their original range, where the brown bear has been listed as threatened since 1975 (Servheen 1989, 1990). Today, Alaska remains the last stronghold in North America for this adaptable, large omnivore (Miller and Schoen 1999) (Fig 1). Brown bears are indigenous to Southeastern Alaska (Southeast), and on the northern islands they occur in some of the highest-density FIG 1. Brown bears occur throughout much of southern populations on earth (Schoen and Beier 1990, Miller et coastal Alaska where they are closely associated with salmon spawning streams. Although brown bears and grizzly bears al. 1997). are the same species, northern and interior populations are The brown bear in Southeast is highly valued by commonly called grizzlies while southern coastal populations big game hunters, bear viewers, and general wildlife are referred to as brown bears. Because of the availability of abundant, high-quality food (e.g. salmon), brown bears enthusiasts. Hiking up a fish stream on the northern are generally much larger, occur at high densities, and have islands of Admiralty, Baranof, or Chichagof during late smaller home ranges than grizzly bears. summer reveals a network of deeply rutted bear trails winding through tunnels of devil’s club (Oplopanx (Klein 1965, MacDonald and Cook 1999) (Fig 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Fish and Wildlife by Residents of Angoon, Admirality Island, Alaska
    Use of Fish and Wildlife by Residents of Angoon, Admiralty Island, Alaska by Gabriel D. George and Robert G. Bosworth Technical Paper No. 159 Part Four in a Study of Relationships between Timber Harvest and Fish and Wildlife Utilization in Selected Southeast Alaska Communities Division of Subsistcncc Alaska Department of Fish and Game Juneau, Alaska April 1988 This research was partially supported by ANlLCA Federal Aid Funds administcrcd through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, SG-5, SG-I-6, and SC-l-7. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables.. ...............................................................................................................................iii List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements.. ....................................................................................................................vii CHAPTER 1. Study Background .. 1 Introduction.. ..........................................................................................................................1 Study Objectives and Methodology.. ...........................................................................3 Objectives.. ......................................................................................................................3 Methodology.. .................................................................................................................4 Literature Review.. .....................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • East Baranof Island
    East Baranof Province as the highest peaks on Admiralty Island, but they intercept more moisture and are more heavily glaciated. They also appear more jagged, because regional ice levels were somewhat lower during the Great Ice Age, and therefore a greater proportion of their summits stood free of the rounding effects of ice. The unnamed 5,328-ft (1,625 m) mountain at the head of Baranof River is the tallest peak on any Southeast island, and overlooks an icefield of about 5 mi2 (12 km2), the largest such expanse on the archipelago. Catherine Island is a giant “tombolo;” only during extreme high tides is it actually separated from Baranof Island by salt water. The largest streams and rivers draining the interior glaciated highlands are braided and aggrading where they reach the lowlands. Most deliver their silt burden into lakes before reaching the ocean. Only Glacial River, terminating in the south arm of Kelp Bay, carries glacial silt all the way into estuarine salt marshes, and is unique among all archipelago streams in this regard. The Clear River also enters these marshes, forming an instructive contrast. East Baranof Province is one of the wettest regions of Southeast. Little Port Walter on southeastern Baranof receives FIG 1. East Baranof Province. 221 in (561 cm) of precipitation annually. Over most of the province, precipitous terrain During the Great Ice Age, the tall mountain massif of precludes the growth of large expanses of hemlock- northern Baranof became a center from which glaciers spruce forest, particularly in the southern portion of the radiated, flowing east into Chatham Strait and west to province.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the Lieutenant Governor Memorandum
    Byron Mallott Lieutenant Governor 530 West 7th Ave, Suite 1700 State Capitol Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Juneau, Alaska 99811 907.269.7460 907.465.3520 [email protected] WWW.L TGOV.ALASKA.GOV OFFICE OF THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR ALASKA MEMORANDUM TO: Shellene Hutter Department of Fish and Game FROM: Scott Meriwether, Office of the Lieutenant Governor Cfr' 465.4081 DATE: May 18, 2018 RE: Filed Permanent Regulations: Board of Fisheries Board of Fisheries Regulations re: Jan 15 - 23, 2018 Sitka Meeting: Southeast and Yakutat Finfish Fisheries (5 AAC 01.670 - 5 AAC 77.683) Attorney General File: JU201720512(Part1) Regulation Filed: 5/18/2018 Effective Date: 6/17/2018 Print: 226,July 2018 cc with enclosures: Linda Miller, Department of Law Judy Herndon, LexisNexis ORDER CERTIFYING THE CHANGES TO REGULATIONS OF THE ALASKA BOARD OF FISHERIES The attached 30 pages of regulations, dealing with finfish fisheries in southeast Alaska are certified to be a correct copy of the regulation changes that the Alaska Board of Fisheries adopted at its January 15-23 meeting in Sitka, Alaska, under the authority of AS 16.05.251 and after compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act (AS 44.62), specifically including notice under AS 44.62.190 and 44.62.200 and opportunity for public comment under AS 44.62.210. This action is not expected to require an increased appropriation. On the record, in considering public comments, the Alaska Board of Fisheries paid special attention to the cost to private persons of the regulatory action being taken. The regulation changes described in this order take effect on the 30th day after they have been filed by the lieutenant governor, as provided in AS 44.62.180.
    [Show full text]
  • Admiralty Island National Monument
    ADMIRALTY ISLAND NATIONAL MONUMENT DESCRIPTION At a glance: Admiralty Island National Monument (NM) is located on Admiralty Island NM quick facts Admiralty Island, 15 miles southwest of Juneau in south- east Alaska, and is accessible only by water or air. The Date established: Dec. 1, 1978; Dec. 2, 1980 island is characterized by rugged coastline, remote old growth rainforest, towering mountains, and alpine tundra Established by: Presidential proclamation, President with permanent icefields. It hosts the largest concentration Jimmy Carter (1978); Congressional designation, Public of brown bears and nesting bald eagles in the world, as Law 96-487 (1980) well as harbor seals, porpoises and sea lions, humpback Forest Service region: 10, Alaska Region whales, and all five species of Pacific salmon in its waters. More than 90 percent of the monument is designated as State: Alaska the Kootznoowoo Wilderness, nearly 1 million acres. Ad- Associated national forest: Tongass miralty Island has been the home to the Tlingít people for approximately 10,000 years. The monument area continues Total Forest Service acres: 997,226 to provide subsistence for these Alaskan Natives. Angoon, Reasons designated: “archaeological, cultural, and Admiralty Island’s only permanent community, continues historical resources, ecological and scientific value” to be an important cultural base. (Presidential Proclamation, 1978) BACKGROUND The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANSCA) of 1971 honored the rights of Alaska Natives to select approxi- People and visitors mately 44 million acres of Federal land in Alaska and au- thorized the Secretary of the Interior to withdraw 80 mil- Nearest metropolitan area: no metro areas within lion acres of land to be studied for possible additions to 500 miles the National Park, Wildlife Refuge, Wild and Scenic Rivers, and National Forest systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of West-Central Alaska
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY OF WEST-CENTRAL ALASKA W.W. Patton, Jr., S.E. Box, E.J. Moll-Stalcup, and T.P. Miller Opcn-File Report OF 89-554 This reporz is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survcy editorial standards. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. CONTENTS Introduction Pre-mid-Cretaceous lithotectonic terranes Minchumina terrane Definition and distribution Description Telida subterrane East Fork subterrane Interpretation and correlation Nixon Fork terrane Definition and djstrib~ltion Descriptioa P~ecambrian metamorphic rocks Lower Paleozoic carbonate rocks Upper Paleozoic and Mesozoic clastic rocks Interpretation and correlation Innoko terrane Definition and distribution Description Interpretation and correlation Ruby terrane Definition and distribution Description Protolith age Agc of metamorphism Interpretations and correlations Angayucham-Tozitna terrane Definition and distribution Description Thc Slate Creek thrust pancl The Narvak thrust pancl The Kanuti thrust panel Interpretation and correlation Koyukuk terranc Definition and distribution Description Interpretation Overlap assemblages Mid- and Upper Cretaceous terrigenous sedimentary rocks Distribution Graywackc and rnudstonc turbidilcs Fluvial and shallow marine conglomerate, sandstone, and shale Marginal conglomerates Fluvial and shallow marine sandstone and shale Interpretation Mid- and Late Cretaceous
    [Show full text]
  • Food Habits of Brown Bears on Northern Admiralty Island In
    FOOD HABITS OF BROWN BEARS ON NORTHERN ADMl,RALTY · I SLANP. , SOUTHEAST.~LASKA ·A THESIS. Presented -to ~he Faculty of the University of Alaska in Partial Fulfillment o·f the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENGE By Thomas M. McCarthy,· }).S. F.iirbanks; Alaska December-1989 FOOD HAB~TS OF BROWN BEARS ON NORTHERN ADMIRALTY ISLAND, SOUTHEAST ALASKA By Thomas Michael McCarthy RECOMMENDED: APPROVED: FOOD HAB.rrs ()F B~QWN BEARS ON NORTHERN A1)~~llAL'J:'Y ··IS.LANl;);. SOtrrliEA&T .'~S~· ·A THESIS Presented ·tro 'the Faculty of the University of Alaska in Partial Fulfillment o£ the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENGE By Thomas.M. McCarthy,· ~.s. Fairbanks, ·Alaska · D~cember·1989 ABSTRACT The food habits of brown bears on northern Admiralty Island in Southeast Alaska were studied through analysis of fecal samples collected in 1984 and 1985. The diets of two groups of bears were examined, those that used low elevation habitats and anadromous fish streams, and those that remained at higher elevations throughout the year. Selected forage items observed in the diets were analyzed for nutrient content. While most bears used the protein-rich salmon resource, bears at high elevations substituted deer, small mammals, and plant species and parts high in nitrogen. Both groups of bears appeared to seek a high energy diet during the fall pre-denning period. In the second phase of the study, captive brown bears were used in feeding trials to determine the digestibilities of 4 natural forages; sedge (Garex lyngbyaei), skunk cabbage (Lysichitum americanum), devil's club berries (Oplopanax horridus), and salmon (Oncorhynchus sp.).
    [Show full text]