DOCSLIB.ORG

Future Requirements and Applications for Orbital Transfer Vehicles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Future Requirements and Applications for Orbital Transfer Vehicles The Space Congress® Proceedings 1983 (20th) Space: The Next Twenty Years Apr 1st, 8:00 AM Future Requirements and Applications for Orbital Transfer Vehicles D. E. Charhut General Dynamics Convair Division, San Diego, California W. J. Ketchum General Dynamics Convair Division, San Diego, California Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Charhut, D. E. and Ketchum, W. J., "Future Requirements and Applications for Orbital Transfer Vehicles" (1983). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 1. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1983-20th/session-iic/1 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FUTURE REQUIREMENTS AND APPLICATIONS FOR ORBITAL TRANSFER VEHICLES By: D.E. Charhut* W.J. Ketchum** General Dynamics Convair Division San Diego, California ABSTRACT — Storage/reconstitution — Threat avoidance/defense The capability of the Space Shuttle will be enhanced by use of the high-energy Centaur to provide payload High OTV performance (through high I Sp and low transfer to higher orbits (geosynchronous, etc.) and vehicle weight) minimizes propellants and maximizes for planetary escape missions. Future orbital transfer payload. Hydrogen-oxygen is currently the highest vehicles (OTV) requirements for NASA, military, and performing chemical combustion rocket propulsion commercial exploitation of space will require system (50% higher ISp than solids or storables). Cen­ taur (Figure 1) is being incorporated improvements and technological developments into the Space such Transportation System (STS) to take advantage of as increased performance, increased reliability, and this in the near future at affordable cost, and methods increased mission versatility. Eventual OTV space to further improve performance and versatility are basing should offer further cost reductions through being considered. As part of the STS, Centaur mis­ vehicle reuse, freedom from Shuttle constraints, and sion assignments include Galileo, ISPM, and two for possible STS propellant recovery. DoD (Figure 2). Under a joint NASA/Air Force pro­ gram, NASA and the Air Force are sharing develop­ This paper summarizes Centaur characteristics, per­ ment costs of the Centaur G (short version). NASA is formance, and program status and presents future funding Centaur G ' (long version). considerations for orbital transfer vehicles into the Space Station era, including their capabilities, opera­ Hydrogen-oxygen OTV are expected to improve and tional requirements, and the technology develop­ endure for many years until noncombustion propul­ ments required to make them a reality. sion (chemical-electric) becomes available to effec­ tively remove Isp limits. INTRODUCTION CENTAUR The goal of space transportation is to provide in­ Centaur is the world's first liquid-hydrogen-powered creased launch opportunity at lower cost. This paper space vehicle. Today, it is the United States' premier addresses orbital transfer vehicles (from low earth upper stage for launching large geosynchronous com­ orbit to higher orbits) and how improvements to this munications satellites, solar exploration spacecraft, segment of the space transportation system can and observatories to study the farthest reaches of contribute to this goal for a number of applications: space. • Commercial programs — Satellite placement The flight-proven Centaur system has been launched — Satellite servicing 67 times on Atlas and Titan boosters. It has per­ • NASA programs formed flawlessly during the last decade of operation, — Planetary missions due in part to the improved guidance, navigation, and — Satellite placement electronics systems incorporated in the early 1970s. It —- Manned orbital operations is currently undergoing performance improvements • DoD programs for INTELSAT that will enhance its capabilities for the — Satellite placement 1980s. • Director, Advanced Space Programs Integrating a modified Centaur high-energy stage •* Project Manager, Orbital Transfer Vehicles with the Space Shuttle offers a significant increase in IIC-26 the high earth orbit and earth-escape performance craft. With on-orbit rendezvous and assembly of the capabilities of the STS. Centaur is the only affordable Centaur and spacecraft payload weights of more than near-term solution for attaining this capability. 20,000 pounds can be placed in geosynchronous Figure 3 shows Centaur performance for planetary equatorial orbit. and geosynchronous earth orbit missions, indicating its capability to perform the Galileo "direct" mission This approach allows the spacecraft to use the full as well as placement of heavy payloads at GEO for 60-foot length of the cargo bay; however, it uses only DoD and other users. about one-third of the lift capability of the Orbiter carrying the spacecraft. Adding a propulsion stage to Studies were begun in 1979 to integrate Centaur into the spacecraft would use some of this excess capabil­ the Space Shuttle using the current D-l configuration ity, and Centaur could thus place even greater with 30,000 pounds of propellant and cylindrical 10- spacecraft weights into geosynchronous orbit. foot-diameter tanks. Delay of the Galileo mission, however, increased energy requirements to the extent FUTURE REQUIREMENTS that additional propellant is required to perform the mission. A decision was made to increase the LH2 The basic drivers for increased capability tank diameter to the maximum orbit allowed within the transfer vehicles (OTV) include cargo bay (14.2 feet), and to lengthen the existing performance, opera­ LO2 tank by 2.5 feet (Figure 4). These modifications tions, and cost-effectiveness. Spacecraft growth from increase the usable propellant weight to 45,000 the current 5,000-pound range to 10,000 pounds and pounds and use the Shuttle cargo bay more efficient­ more is already beginning to happen. High velocities ly. The resulting configuration — Centaur G' — has are needed for planetary and maneuvering spacecraft. a vehicle length of 29.1 feet, with 30 feet of the Orbi- In the 1990s, missions are contemplated with round- ter cargo bay available to the spacecraft. trip capability to service satellites at GEO and others for manned sortie. For this, OTV must fulfill the By maintaining the Centaur D-l LO2 tank diameter, following requirements: the basic vehicle proplusion system remains un­ • Very high performance: 15,000 to 30,000-pound changed, although the larger LH2 tank does require payloads, servicing and round trip. an increased-diameter forward stub adapter and equipment module. • Low acceleration: maximize size of large space structures. For longer spacecraft, a shorter Centaur version uses • Reusability: reduce operating costs and return only 29,500 pounds of propellant at a slightly higher payloads. engine mixture ratio of 6:1 (the standard ratio is 5:1). • Aerobraking: double round-trip payload (versus This configuration, called Centaur G, is only 19.5 feet all propulsive). long and allows spacecraft up to 40 feet long in the • Manrating: Orbit transfer and sortie for crew Orbiter. modules. • Spacebasing: free from Shuttle constraints. Shuttle/Centaur G will have the geosynchronous capability to deliver large communications satellites Operations in space require quick reaction, restart for weighing 10,600 pounds with lengths up to 40 feet. orbit relocation, or low acceleration to transfer very This is more than double the IUS capability, with large, delicate spacecraft. Future space only five percent less spacecraft transportation length. For heavier systems (Figure 5), including spacecraft, Centaur J, with propellant tanks resized growth versions of ex­ to hold 35,000 pounds, will be capable of launching a isting or new vehicles, should be more cost effective. 14,000-pound spacecraft up to 37.6 feet long into Increased capability tends to lower the cost per pound geostationary orbits. of payload delivered to high orbit. These capabilities will dramatically enhance the ENGINES United States' ability to launch large communication satellites. Without Shuttle/Centaur, the size of com­ Design studies and tests by the major engine contrac­ munication spacecraft would be limited until further tors indicated the feasibility of increasing hydrogen- performance improvements can be realized with oxygen Isp to 480 seconds (compared with 450 Ariane or the IUS, or until the United States can seconds currently). Figure 6 indicates several can­ afford to develop a new cryogenic OTV. didate engines. The limiting factor for Shuttle/Centaur geosyn­ Relatively small increases are not without great conse­ chronous payload capability is the maximum lift quence for such future missions as GEO round trips. capability of the Orbiter: 65,000 pounds. One way to For example, a 20-second Isp increase could double increase this capability is to use one Orbiter to launch the round trip payload of a shuttle-launched, all- Centaur and a second Orbiter to launch the space­ propulsive, reusable (ground-based) OTV. IIC-27 LOW THRUST Studies performed for the Air Force and NASA have concluded that the use of a toroidal liquid oxygen Spacecraft that are much larger and more complex tank with the main propulsion engine mounted in the are being proposed (large geostationary communica­ central void space provides the minimum
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160008869 2019-08-29T17:47:59+00:00Z CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA News National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington
    NASA News National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington. D C 20546 AC 202 755-8370 For Release IMMEDIATE Press Kit Project Intelsat V-D RELEASE NO: 82-30 Contents GENERAL RELEASE 1 ATLAS CENTAUR, LAUNCH VEHICLE STATISTICS 3 LAUNCH OPERATIONS 4 LAUNCH SEQUENCE FOR INTELSAT V-D 5 THE NASA INTELSAT TEAM 6 CONTRACTORS 7 /lNASA-News-Belease-82^TOl INTELSAT N82-22295 "\ (SATELLITE SCHEDULED FOR LAUNCH (National (Aeronautics and Space Administration) 8 p I CSCL 22A Unclas I 00/15 18771 February 26, 1982 NASA News National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington. D C 20546 AC 202 755-8370 For Release Dick McCormack Headquarters, Washington, D.C. IMMEDIATE (Phone: 202/755-8104) RELEASE NO: 82-30 INTELSAT SATELLITE SCHEDULED FOR LAUNCH Intelsat V-D, the fourth of a new series of nine inter- national telecommunications satellites owned and operated by the 105-nation International Telecommunications Satellite Organiza- tion (Intelsat), is scheduled to be launched by the NASA Kennedy Space Center on board an Atlas Centaur launch vehicle no earlier than March 4, 1982, from Cape Canaveral, Fla. The three Intelsat Vs were successfully launched by NASA in December 1980, May 1981 and December 1981. Intelsat V-D weighs 1,928 kilograms (4,251 pounds) at launch and has almost double the communications capability of early satellites in the Intelsat series — 12,000 voice circuits and two color television channels. It will be positioned in geosyn- chronous orbit over the Indian Ocean as the prime Intelsat satel- lite to provide communications services between Europe, the Middle East and the Far East.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of a Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle Design Using Small Liquid
    Analysis of a Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle Design Using Small Liquid Rocket Engines by DAVID PHILLIP RUSS S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1987 SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 1988 ® David P. Russ 1988 The author hereby grants M.I.T. and Hughes Aircraft Company permission to reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics December 18, 1987 Reviewed by C. P. Rubin Hughes Aircraft Company Certified by Professor Walter M. Hollister Thesis Supervjsor, Departmer of Aeronautics and Astronautics .. Accepted by , .AU Professor Harold Y. Wachman Chairman, Depart'rmental Graduate Committee Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics MAY i od ;WITHDRAWfIN i M.I.1W.i..: P. I LBRARt S UBAer 7:Ir_ Aero Analysis of a Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle Design Using Small Liquid Rocket Engines by David P. Russ Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics May, 1988 Abstract The trend in launch vehicle design has been to increase performance by using en- gines of greater and greater complexity, which has a negative effect on cost and reliability. However, a design making use of over 300 small, simple rocket engines can deliver over 340,000 lbs to low Earth orbit. This design, derived by using the rocket equations to size the major components, features a 42 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego History Center Is a Museum, Education Center, and Research Library Founded As the San Diego Historical Society in 1928
    The Journal of San Diego Volume 58 Fall 2012 Number 4 • The Journal of San Diego Number History 2012 58 Fall Volume History Publication of The Journal of San Diego History is underwritten by a major grant from the Quest for Truth Foundation, established by the late James G. Scripps. Additional support is provided by “The Journal of San Diego History Fund” of the San Diego Foundation and private donors. The color section for the Charles Reiffel Exhibit Review has been underwritten by Thompson Fetter. The San Diego History Center is a museum, education center, and research library founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928. Its activities are supported by: the City of San Diego’s Commission for Arts and Culture; the County of San Diego; individuals; foundations; corporations; fundraising events; membership dues; admissions; shop sales; and rights and reproduction fees. Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life. The paper in the publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Science-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Front Cover: Charles Reiffel, San Diego Harbor. Oil on Canvas, 1936. The San Diego History Center on loan from the Fine Arts Program, Public Building Services, US General Administration, commissioned through the New Deal art projects. Charles Reiffel: An American Post-Impressionist, Catalogue No. 63. Back Cover: Charles Reiffel, detail from History of San Diego—Colonial, 1939. The San Diego History Center, gift of Donna Sefton. Cover Design: Allen Wynar The Journal of San Diego History IRIS H.
    [Show full text]
  • Catching up in the Moon Race by Andrew J
    Catching Up in the Moon Race by Andrew J. LePage December 15, 1999 Introduction recognized that an ICBM was a feasible weapon. The Atlas made use of an innovative stage-and-a-half Before NASA was founded in October of 1958, the design where a pair of booster engines were USAF had ambitous plans for space exploration. jettisoned after they were no longer needed during During the national debate that followed the launch ascent. A sustainer engine would then push the of Sputnik, the USAF was trying to position itself so payload towards its target feeding off of the that it could dominate the nation's infant space remaining propellants in the missile's lightweight program. Even after the Advanced Research Projects integral propellant tanks that used internal pressure to Agency (ARPA) was founded in February of 1958 maintain the stiffness of the missile. The first model, and given the task of coordinating America's military Atlas A, only used the pair of booster engines to send space programs, USAF efforts and plans figured the rocket on an abbreviated test flight. Atlas 4A prominently. made the first test flight on June 11, 1957 but failed. The first successful test, Atlas 12A, came on The USAF's first step beyond the Earth orbit was a December 17 of that year. lunar exploration program approved by President Eisenhower as part Operation Mona on March 27, The next model, the Atlas B, had a full complement 1958 (see Operation Mona: America's First Moon of engines and would test the complete weapon Program in the April 1998 issue of SpaceViews).
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Designations and Popular Names
    Chapter 1 Aircraft Designations and Popular Names Background on the Evolution of Aircraft Designations Aircraft model designation history is very complex. To fully understand the designations, it is important to know the factors that played a role in developing the different missions that aircraft have been called upon to perform. Technological changes affecting aircraft capabilities have resulted in corresponding changes in the operational capabilities and techniques employed by the aircraft. Prior to WWI, the Navy tried various schemes for designating aircraft. In the early period of naval aviation a system was developed to designate an aircraft’s mission. Different aircraft class designations evolved for the various types of missions performed by naval aircraft. This became known as the Aircraft Class Designation System. Numerous changes have been made to this system since the inception of naval aviation in 1911. While reading this section, various references will be made to the Aircraft Class Designation System, Designation of Aircraft, Model Designation of Naval Aircraft, Aircraft Designation System, and Model Designation of Military Aircraft. All of these references refer to the same system involved in designating aircraft classes. This system is then used to develop the specific designations assigned to each type of aircraft operated by the Navy. The F3F-4, TBF-1, AD-3, PBY-5A, A-4, A-6E, and F/A-18C are all examples of specific types of naval aircraft designations, which were developed from the Aircraft Class Designation System. Aircraft Class Designation System Early Period of Naval Aviation up to 1920 The uncertainties during the early period of naval aviation were reflected by the problems encountered in settling on a functional system for designating naval aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT: CENTAUR (AC-8) (To Be Launched No Earlier Than March 29, 1966)
    ~~ ~~ NATIONAL AERC)NAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATI?”1 TELS W‘: ?-4IF,5 WASHINGTON, D C 20546 &q {-‘,9?5 FOR RELEASE: THURSL’.jY P.M. MARCH 24, 1966 RELEASE NO: 66-58 PROJECT: CENTAUR (AC-8) (To be launched no earlier than March 29, 1966) . ._ CONTENTS -End- r (ACCESSION NUMBER CTHRUI - z0 T (NASA CR OR TUX OR AD NUMBER) ICATEGORYj I ~~ NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WO 2-41 55 WASHINGTON. D.C. 20546 TELS. wo 3-6915 NEWS ~~~~ FOR RELEASE: THURSDAY Poi% MARCH 24, 1966 RELEASE NO: 66-58 CENTAUR DEVELOPMENT FLIGHT SCHEDULED FOR LAUNCH MARCH 29 The seventh Atlas-Centaur launch vehicle is scheduled for a development flight from Cape Kennedy no earlier that March 29. Centaur is a hydrogen-fueled upper-stage combined with an Atlas booster, designed for high-energy lunar and planetary missions. The AC-6,launched Aug. 11, 1965, completed the first phase of its development effort and the vehicle. Centaur is now operational for direct-ascent Surveyor missions to the Moon. Purpose of this mission, designated Atlas-Centaur 8 (AC-8), is to demonstrate Centaur's capability to restart its high-energy engines in the space environment following a coast period in Earth orbit, or an indirect ascent. If the coning test is successful, NASA's first operational mission using the Centaur is aimed at placing a Surveyor ;pace- craft on the Moon. The first Surveyor is scheduled for tk;e second quarter of this year. -more- 3/18/66 -2 - Atlas-Centaur vehicles also have been selected to launch Mariner spacecraft on Mars flybys during the 1969 launch opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    THE CAPE Military Space Operations 1971-1992 by Mark C. Cleary 45th Space Wing History Office Table of Contents Preface Chapter I -USAF Space Organizations and Programs Table of Contents Section 1 - Air Force Systems Command and Subordinate Space Agencies at Cape Canaveral Section 2 - The Creation of Air Force Space Command and Transfer of Air Force Space Resources Section 3 - Defense Department Involvement in the Space Shuttle Section 4 - Air Force Space Launch Vehicles: SCOUT, THOR, ATLAS and TITAN Section 5 - Early Space Shuttle Flights Section 6 - Origins of the TITAN IV Program Section 7 - Development of the ATLAS II and DELTA II Launch Vehicles and the TITAN IV/CENTAUR Upper Stage Section 8 - Space Shuttle Support of Military Payloads Section 9 - U.S. and Soviet Military Space Competition in the 1970s and 1980s Chapter II - TITAN and Shuttle Military Space Operations Section 1 - 6555th Aerospace Test Group Responsibilities Section 2 - Launch Squadron Supervision of Military Space Operations in the 1990s Section 3 - TITAN IV Launch Contractors and Eastern Range Support Contractors Section 4 - Quality Assurance and Payload Processing Agencies Section 5 - TITAN IIIC Military Space Missions after 1970 Section 6 - TITAN 34D Military Space Operations and Facilities at the Cape Section 7 - TITAN IV Program Activation and Completion of the TITAN 34D Program Section 8 - TITAN IV Operations after First Launch Section 9 - Space Shuttle Military Missions Chapter III - Medium and Light Military Space Operations Section 1 - Medium Launch Vehicle and Payload Operations Section 2 - Evolution of the NAVSTAR Global Positioning System and Development of the DELTA II Section 3 - DELTA II Processing and Flight Features Section 4 - NAVSTAR II Global Positioning System Missions Section 5 - Strategic Defense Initiative Missions and the NATO IVA Mission Section 6 - ATLAS/CENTAUR Missions at the Cape Section 7 - Modification of Cape Facilities for ATLAS II/CENTAUR Operations Section 8 - ATLAS II/CENTAUR Missions Section 9 - STARBIRD and RED TIGRESS Operations Section 10 - U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the C. Roger Cripliver Papers (1918
    Guide to the C. Roger Cripliver Papers (1918 - 2007) 194.5 linear feet Accession Number: 54-06 Collection Number: H54-06 Collection Dates: 1921 - 2007 Bulk Dates: 1930 - 1996 Prepared by Thomas J. Allen CITATION: The C. Roger Cripliver Papers, Document Name or Type, Series Number Box number, Folder number, History of Aviation Collection, Special Collections Department, McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas. Special Collections Department McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas Contents Biographical Sketch: ........................................................................................................... 3 Sources: ............................................................................................................................... 4 Additional Sources: ............................................................................................................. 4 Series Description ............................................................................................................... 4 Scope and Content Note.................................................................................................... 10 Provenance Statement ....................................................................................................... 17 Literary Rights Statement ................................................................................................. 17 Note to Researcher ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Centaur for the 1980'S
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 1981 (18th) The Year of the Shuttle Apr 1st, 8:00 AM Centaur for the 1980's John E. Niesley Advanced Systems Project Engineer, Advanced Centaur Programs, General Dynamics Convair Division Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Niesley, John E., "Centaur for the 1980's" (1981). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 4. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1981-18th/session-6/4 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CENTAUR FOR THE 1980s JOHN E. NIESLEY Advanced Systems Project Engineer Advanced Centaur Programs General Dynamics Convair Division San Diego, California ABSTRACT Currently, Centaur is undergoing additional per­ Centaur is currently the world's only operational high- formance improvements for Intelsat, which will energy upper stage, and is the United States primary enhance its capabilities for the 1980s. NASA has also upper stage for launching solar system probes, large recently decided to integrate Centaur with the Space geosynchronous communication satellites, and obser­ Shuttle for solar exploration missions, large future vatories to study the farthest limits of space. Centaur is geosynchronous commercial satellites, and potential currently launched on Atlas, but has also flown with Department of Defense (DoD) missions. These appli­ the larger Titan booster. NASA recently decided to in­ cations will ensure continued use of Centaur through tegrate Centaur with the Space Shuttle for future solar the remainder of the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveyor a Press Kit 66-127 May 26 1966
    I NAIIONAL aeronautics and space administration rr. c;-' WA S H I N G T O N , D C . 2 0 ' i 4 6 ras"• - . ^ FOP. RELEASES THURSDAY P.M. May 26, 1966' RELEASE NO: 66-12? PROJECT: SURVEYOR A (To be launched no earlier than May 30, 1966) COr^ENTS GENERAL RELEASE ^-l-i SURVEYOR A SPACECRAFT 5-17 F r a m e , M e c h a n i s m s a n d T h e r m a l C o n t r o l 5 - 8 P o w e r S u b s y s t e m 8 - 1 0 T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s — • l l r - 1 2 F l i g h t C o n t r o l S u b s y s t e m - 1 3 - 1 4 Television 15-l6 E n g i n e e r i n g I n s t r u m e n t a t i o n — I 6 - I 7 AT L A S - C E N TA U R ( A C - I O ) L A U N C H V E H I C L E 1 8 - 2 2 P r e - f l i g h t C h e c k o u t — — - — — — 2 0 - 2 1 C e n t a u r F l i g h t H i s t o r y — — 2 1 - 2 2 ATLAS-CENTAUR FACT SHEET 23 ' .
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas F Entry Aerothermic Study
    NASA CR- 132 4 0 9 REPORT NO. GDCA-BGJ72-017 CONTRACT F04701-72-C-0054 ((NASA-CR-132409) ATLAS F ENTRY N74-17566) !AEROTHERMIC STUDY Final Report (General Dynamics Corp.) 6-7-p HC $11.50 CSCL 22B /4 Unclas G3/31 30140 ATLAS F ENTRY AEROTHERMIC STUDY FINAL REPORT •1,974 PV. S'1,9A,4C "/T -" " L .r GENERAL DYNAMICS Convair Aerospace Division NASA CR- 13 24 0 9 REPORT NO. GDCA-BGJ72-017 ATLAS F ENTRY AEROTHERMIC STUDY FINAL REPORT December 1972 Prepared Under TCP 2491 to Contract F04701-72-C-0054 Prepared by CONVAIR AEROSPACE DIVISION OF GENERAL DYNAMICS San Diego, California / FOREWORD This study was initiated at the request of NASA Langley Research Center (LRC) and accomplished under TCP 2491 to Contract F04701-72-C-0054 by arrangement between SAVISO and NASA-LRC. The study was conducted under the direction of J. Dunavant, the NASA-LRC Technical Monitor, and R. Romero of the Atlas E/F Project Office. Listed below are the personnel who participated in the study and their areas of cognizance: R.S. Wentink Study Manager A. Arcidiacono R. Norell Aeroballistics D.R. Lukens sR.L. Watson Control Dynamics W. McDonald Electrical Systems G. B. Wood Instrumentation R. R. Henry R F System E. W. Schwartz Space Thermodynamics J. E. Dyer Structural Analysis R. J. Conway Thermodynamics-Launch Vehicle iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION . 1-1 2 STUDY RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. 2-1 2.1 Mission and Trajectory Evaluation . 2-1 2.1.1 Mission Evaluation. 2-1 2.1.2 Aerodynamics Coefficients .
    [Show full text]