General Dynamics/Convair Environmental Impact Report Collection Source: General Dynamics Corporation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Dynamics/Convair Environmental Impact Report Collection Source: General Dynamics Corporation http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8542r09 Online items available The Descriptive Finding Guide for the General Dynamics Convair Environmental Impact Report Collection SDASM.SC.10043 San Diego Air and Space Museum Library and Archives 11/04/14 2001 Pan American Plaza, Balboa Park San Diego 92101 URL: http://www.sandiegoairandspace.org/ SDASM.SC.10043 1 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: San Diego Air and Space Museum Library and Archives Title: General Dynamics/Convair Environmental Impact Report Collection source: General Dynamics Corporation. Convair Division Identifier/Call Number: SDASM.SC.10043 Physical Description: 0.2 Cubic FeetOne box 10” X 15.5” X 2.25.” Date (inclusive): 1935-1995 Abstract: General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American aerospace and defense company established through a series of acquisitions and mergers, forming in 1952 through the combination of the Electric Boat Company, Consolidated-Vultee (Convair) and many others. The Division’s Lindbergh Field plant and Harbor Drive Test Facility were on land leased from the San Diego Unified Port District. GD arranged with the Port District to surrender its leaseholds in phases. This report was generated from this process. Conditions Governing Access The collection is open to researchers by appointment. Conditions Governing Use Some copyright may be reserved. Consult with the library director for more information. Preferred Citation [Item], [Filing Unit], [Series Title], [Subgroups], [Record Group Title and Number], [Repository “San Diego Air & Space Museum Library & Archives”] Immediate Source of Acquisition The materials in this Collection were donated to the San Diego Air and Space Museum. The Collection has been processed and open to researchers. Biographical / Historical General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American aerospace and defense company established through a series of acquisitions and mergers, forming in 1952 through the combination of the Electric Boat Company, Consolidated-Vultee (Convair) and many others. Convair itself was established in San Diego by Reuben H. Fleet was an American aviation pioneer, industrialist and army officer as well as founder of Consolidated Aircraft Co. in 1923. In 1936, he moved from Buffalo, NY, to San Diego, CA, where Convair was formed in 1943 by the merger of Vultee Aircraft and Consolidated Aircraft, after which the name Consolidated-Vultee shortened to Convair. Headquartered in San Diego, the company produced a number of pioneering aircraft. In 1952 Convair was acquired by GD, but eventually the Convair Division of General Dynamics terminated its aerospace manufacturing operation in San Diego in December 1995. The Division’s Lindberg Field plant and Harbor Drive Test Facility were on land leased from the San Diego Unified Port District. GD arranged with the Port District to surrender its leaseholds in phases. This process began in 1995 and continued through 1997. Altogether thirty-five buildings on 92.8 acres were demolished. Scope and Contents One box 10” X 15.5” X 2.25.” Containing Final draft of Environmental Impact Report as well as photographs, negatives, and maps. Original negative envelope indicated 36 negatives, collection actually contains 33 original images. Related Materials Additional copy of report available in annex library San Diego Air & Space Museum. LC#: HD 9711.U63.G4523 1996 Convair/General Dynamics' Corporate Papers and Photograph Collection http://www.sandiegoairandspace.org/collections/collection_item.php?id=55 Additional Research Institutions: General Dynamics Corporation http://www.generaldynamics.com/about/corporate-overview/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/sets/72157640651338064 Subjects and Indexing Terms Convair San Diego International Airport Fleet, Reuben Hollis General Dynamics Corporation. Convair Division SDASM.SC.10043 2 Box 01 Folder 01 –Final Environmental Impact Report, 1996 Physical Description: 304 Pages Folder 02 – Photo Captions for HABS Level Documentation Physical Description: 1. Six (6) pages of HABS photo captions and directions for reading captions including Lindbergh Field Plant site map. (2 copies) Folder 03 – Photo Negatives HABS Level Physical Description: 1. Building Number 2 – SE (sans truck wall) and NE sides. 2. Building Number 2 – SE side. 3. Building Number 2 – SW sides. 4. Building Number 2 – SW and NW sides, detail view showing hanger doors and angled walls of this end of building. 5. Building Number 2 – SW and NW sides, detail view showing Hanger door, angled walls and clerestory. 6. Building Number 2 – NW side. 7. Building Number 2 – Interior view looking 296 degrees NW from mezzanine at NE end. 8. Building Number 2 – Interior view looking 150 degrees S. 9. Building Number 3 – East side seen from NW corner of building no. 2. 10. Building Number 3 – East side and corner with south side. 11. Building Number 3 – South side. 12. Building Number 3 – West and North sides. 13. Building Number 3 – West side detail showing clerestory. 14. Building Number 3 – Interior view showing lube pit in SW corner of building. 15. Building Number 3 – Interior view looking 140 degrees S. from mezzanine at north end. 16. Building Number 4 – SE and NE sides. 17. Building Number 4 – SW and SE sides. 18. Building Number 4 – SW side seen from same camera position as photo no. 17. 19. Building Number 4 - SW side showing passageway at mid-point of building. 20. Multi-part image a. Building Number 4 – part 1of 4 part view of SW side seen from parking lot 11. b. Building Number 4 – part 2 of 4 part view of SW side seen from parking lot 11. c. Building Number 4 – part 3 of 4 part view of SW side seen from parking lot 11. d. Building Number 4 – part 4 of 4 part view of SW side seen from parking lot 11. 21. Building Number 4 – NW side, view looking 140 degrees S. 22. Building Number 4 – NE side, view looking 132 degrees SE. 23. Building Number 4 – SW side, view looking 90 degrees E. 24. Building Number 4 – NE side showing passageway at midpoint of building. 25. Building Number 4 – Interior view of north end of building. 26. Building Number 6 – SW and SE sides of building, looking 348 degrees N. 27. Building Number 6 – NW and SW sides of building, looking 72 degrees E. 28. Building Number 8 – SW and SE sides of building, looking 338 degrees NNW. 29. Building Number 8 – NE and NW sides of building, looking 166 degrees S. 30. Building Number 9 – SW and SE sides of building, looking N. 31. Building Number 9 – NW and SW Sides of building, looking 98 degrees E. 32. Building Number 9 – Interior view of boilers. 33. Building Number 9 – Interior view of pumps. Folder 04a – Photographs I: Individual Photos, HABS Level photos #1-15 Physical Description: 1. Building Number 2 – SE (sunstruck wall) and NE sides. 2. Building Number 2 – SE side. 3. Building Number 2 SW sides. 4. Building Number 2 SW and NW sides, detail view showing hanger doors and angled walls of this end of building. 5. Building Number 2 – SW and NW sides, detail view showing Hanger door, angled walls and clerestory. 6. Building Number 2 – NW side. 7. Building Number 2 – Interior view looking 296 degrees NW from mezzanine at NE end. 8. Building Number 2 – Interior view looking 150 degrees S. 9. Building number 3 – East side seen from NW corner of building no. 2. 10. Building Number 3 – East side and corner with south side. 11. Building Number 3 – South side. 12. Building Number 3 – West and North sides. 13. Building Number 3 – West side detail showing clerestory. 14. Building Number 3 – Interior view showing lube pit in SW corner of building. SDASM.SC.10043 3 Folder 04b – Photographs II: Individual Photos, HABS Level Photos 16-33 Physical Description: 1. Building Number 4 – SE and NE sides. 2. Building Number 4 – SW and SE sides. 3. Building Number 4 – SW side seen from same camera position as photo no. 17. 4. Building Number 4 - SW side showing passageway at mid-point of building. 5. Multi-part image. a. Building Number 4 – part 1of 4 part view of SW side seen from parking lot 11. b. Building Number 4 – part 2 of 4 part view of SW side seen from parking lot 11. c. Building Number 4 – part 3 of 4 part view of SW side seen from parking lot 11. d. Building Number 4 – part 4 of 4 part view of SW side seen from parking lot 11 6. Building Number 4 – NW side, view looking 140 degrees S. 7. Building Number 4 – NE side, view looking 132 degrees SE. 8. Building Number 4 – SW side, view looking 90 degrees E. 9. Building Number 4 – NE side showing passageway at midpoint of building. 10. Building Number 4 – Interior view of north end of building. 11. Building Number 6 – SW and SE sides of building, looking 348 degrees N. 12. Building Number 6 – NW and SW sides of building, looking 72 degrees E. 13. Building Number 8 – SW and SE sides of building, looking 338 degrees NNW. 14. Building Number 8 – NE and NW sides of building, looking 166 degrees S. 15. Building Number 9 – SW and SE sides of building, looking N. 16. Building Number 9 – NW and SW Sides of building, looking 98 degrees E. 17. Building Number 9 – Interior view of boilers. 18. Building Number 9 – Interior view of pumps. SDASM.SC.10043 4.
Recommended publications
  • 2020 Corporate Sustainability Report
    TRANSPARENCY. TRUST. ALIGNMENT. HONESTY. 2020 Corporate Sustainability Report OUR ETHOS TRANSPARENCY. TRUST. ALIGNMENT. HONESTY. These four values undergird everything we do at General Dynamics — they are our defining moral character. All of us at General Dynamics have a duty to behave according to these values. Through our shared Ethos, we ensure that we continue to be good stewards of the investments our shareholders, customers, employees and communities make in us, now and in the future. TABLE OF CONTENTS OUR ETHOS 2 A Letter From Our CEO 4 OUR BUSINESS 5 Our Values at Work 6 Business Overview 7 Corporate Responsibility 10 Global Supply Chain 12 GOVERNANCE 14 Corporate Governance 15 Ethics 18 Information Security 21 HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 25 Employee Safety 26 Employee Well-Being 27 Developing and Engaging Our Talent 28 DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION 29 Diversity Is Critical to Innovation 30 Talent Recruiting and Retaining Diverse Talent 32 Awards & Recognition 36 ENVIRONMENT 37 Environmental Responsibility 38 Examples From Our Businesses 41 COMMUNITY RELATIONS 45 Investing in Our Communities 46 COVID-19 Response 50 REPORTING APPROACH 52 A Letter from Our CEO Dear Fellow Shareholder, Corporate sustainability at General Dynamics is rooted in our Ethos — our defining moral character as a company and the standard to which we hold ourselves and our more than 100,000 employees worldwide. It informs all that we do and guides us as we deliver value to our shareholders, our customers and our communities. Ongoing conversations with all of our stakeholders have been an integral part of building and evolving our sustainability program. We remain committed to reducing our global environmental impact, including our carbon footprint; protecting and promoting human rights; increasing the diversity of our workforce; supporting the health, welfare and safety of our employees; and fostering mutually beneficial relationships with our communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160008869 2019-08-29T17:47:59+00:00Z CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost.
    [Show full text]
  • BOMBS AWAY' from 60,0
    The unconventional, far-ahead, supersonic B-58 Hustler is poised combat-ready at Cars- well AFB in Texas — a new addition to the free world's deterrent strength. USAF air- men and their B-58s have been engaged in intensive training. They have also taken time out to rewrite a page or two of the record book . 'BOMBS AWAY' from 60,0 Col. J. K. Johnson, USAF FORMER COMMANDER, 43d BOMB WING (M), SAC HE TARGET is Deerfield, Mass. You're twelve sive. It may not quite rival those reported by miles up, moving at twice the speed of sound. high-altitude record setters and balloonists, or T But there's no sense of speed, of motion. You nation's first Astronaut, but it still covers a giant fi seem to be hanging high above the earth on an in- of vision. To the right, far below, are the lights visible thread strung from somewhere in the universe. Buffalo, N. Y., 150 miles away. You see a lot of te It's calm, smooth, peaceful, quiet—in sharp con- tory from a dozen miles up—although you don't rea trast to the dread lethality of your bomb load. Actu- need to for purposes of this mission. All the infa ally, the bomb load is simulated. This is a practice mation required to plunk your "electronic payloac strike. It could be for real. Deerfield, some 3,500 on target is carried in black boxes in the plane. It miles from home base by a circuitous exercise route, automatically fed to computers to keep you on ems! provides a particular pattern on a radar screen.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA News National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington
    NASA News National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington. D C 20546 AC 202 755-8370 For Release IMMEDIATE Press Kit Project Intelsat V-D RELEASE NO: 82-30 Contents GENERAL RELEASE 1 ATLAS CENTAUR, LAUNCH VEHICLE STATISTICS 3 LAUNCH OPERATIONS 4 LAUNCH SEQUENCE FOR INTELSAT V-D 5 THE NASA INTELSAT TEAM 6 CONTRACTORS 7 /lNASA-News-Belease-82^TOl INTELSAT N82-22295 "\ (SATELLITE SCHEDULED FOR LAUNCH (National (Aeronautics and Space Administration) 8 p I CSCL 22A Unclas I 00/15 18771 February 26, 1982 NASA News National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington. D C 20546 AC 202 755-8370 For Release Dick McCormack Headquarters, Washington, D.C. IMMEDIATE (Phone: 202/755-8104) RELEASE NO: 82-30 INTELSAT SATELLITE SCHEDULED FOR LAUNCH Intelsat V-D, the fourth of a new series of nine inter- national telecommunications satellites owned and operated by the 105-nation International Telecommunications Satellite Organiza- tion (Intelsat), is scheduled to be launched by the NASA Kennedy Space Center on board an Atlas Centaur launch vehicle no earlier than March 4, 1982, from Cape Canaveral, Fla. The three Intelsat Vs were successfully launched by NASA in December 1980, May 1981 and December 1981. Intelsat V-D weighs 1,928 kilograms (4,251 pounds) at launch and has almost double the communications capability of early satellites in the Intelsat series — 12,000 voice circuits and two color television channels. It will be positioned in geosyn- chronous orbit over the Indian Ocean as the prime Intelsat satel- lite to provide communications services between Europe, the Middle East and the Far East.
    [Show full text]
  • General Dynamics Electric Boat Invoices
    General Dynamics Electric Boat Invoices tastedBruce panningswhole while prehistorically small-town Constantineif inessive Stanly monkey sleeved that sumpters.or vitalised. Festinate and sprightliest Rodrick sectarianizing some limos so lingually! Morton still The invoicing party of command and the developer shall be construed as this retirement benefits are currently under this Ifeither part breache an ofthe terms provisions orconditions ofthis Agreementb. Gtin information with written notice and this allegation is used as we also be. At General Dynamics Electric Boat We hook the sentence that. The versatile Greyhound can void support special operations and distinguished visitor transport requirements. Landlord of any or all other rights or remedies provided for in this Lease, if any, or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. Conflict mineral that year of invoices received from raw materials per share data, legal meaning to minimiz terroristhreat throug th. We are using cookies to give you the best experience follow our website. To the extent backlog has not been funded, there is no assurance that congressional appropriations or agency allotments will be forthcoming. Assigned to the Military Sealift Command they are manned by civilian mariners. AGREEMENT GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT. Electric boat corporation company estimates made in advanced gun and all gtins may be. City any attempt to supplying any manner cannot pay to take a general dynamics electric boat invoices have the delivery of being used. Terminal range of invoices received from indeed, service providers and deduction of? Haanyon eve aske me a captcha proves you agree on gold for general dynamics electric boat pursuant to.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C – Key Studies on Aircraft Deviation ACRP 4-09 - Risk Assessment Method to Support Modification of Airfield Separation Standards
    Appendix C – Key Studies on Aircraft Deviation ACRP 4-09 - Risk Assessment Method to Support Modification of Airfield Separation Standards The following table summarizes some of the most relevant studies addressing lateral aircraft deviations during runway, taxiway and taxilane operations. The models developed by Scholz (2003a and 2003b) were used in the approach to analyze taxiway and taxilane separations. Table C-1. Relevant studies on aircraft lateral deviation in airfields Title Year/Author Description Evaluation of Brown & This study was conducted with test sections for B-47 Existing Thompson, 1973 (Stratojet), B-52, KC-87, and KC-135 aircraft. The Airfields for C- report also makes reference to studies conducted in 1949 5A Operations and field observations carried out in 1956. The concept of wander was introduced. Wander was defined as “the maximum lateral movement of a point on the centerline of an aircraft about the centerline (or guideline) on taxiways or runways during operation of the aircraft.” The lateral deviations for those aircraft from the taxiway and runway centerlines can be considered as approximately 3.2 ft and 33.7 ft, respectively, during 75 percent of the time. Field Survey and HoSang, 1975 Deviation data were collected from 9 airports and 12 Analysis of types of commercial aircraft with maximum gross Aircraft weights above 50,000 pounds, including: Boeing 747, Distribution on 707, 727 and 737; McDonnell-Douglas DC-10, DC-8 and Airport DC-9; Lockheed L-1101; General Dynamics Convair 880 Pavements and 580; British Aircraft Corporation BAC-111; and Nihon YS-11. The standard deviations for individual aircraft types, compared at the various airports, varied from 3 to 8 ft for takeoffs and from 4 to 9 ft for landings.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Corps Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV)
    Updated June 10, 2021 Marine Corps Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) What Is the Advanced Reconnaissance anti-armor capability to defeat close-in heavy armor Vehicle (ARV)? threats; According to the Marine Corps, the Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) aims to be a new armored precision-guided munitions (PGMs) to defeat threats vehicle family to replace the Light Armored Vehicle (LAV) beyond the engagement range of threat systems; (Figure 1): Since the 1980s, the Light Armored Vehicle (LAV) unmanned systems swarm capability to provide persistent, multifunction munitions; has supported Marine Air-Ground Task Force missions on the battlefield. While the LAV remains advanced, networked, multifunctional electronic warfare operationally effective, the life cycle of this system (EW ) capabilities; is set to expire in the mid-2030s…. The Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) [the LAV’s a modern command-and-control suite and a full range of replacement] will be highly mobile, networked, sensors to enhance and extend reconnaissance and transportable, protected, and lethal. The capability surveillance ranges; will provide, sensors, communication systems and lethality options to overmatch threats that have organic unmanned aerial and ground systems historically been addressed with more heavily (UAS/UGS) that can be deployed from the ARV; armored systems. The ARV will be an advanced combat vehicle system, capable of fighting for active and passive vehicle protection capabilities to information that balances competing capability sense, orient, classify, track, and defeat incoming demands to sense, shoot, move, communicate and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), anti-tank guided remain transportable as part of the naval missiles (ATGMs), and PGM threats with hard-and soft- expeditionary force.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of a Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle Design Using Small Liquid
    Analysis of a Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle Design Using Small Liquid Rocket Engines by DAVID PHILLIP RUSS S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1987 SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 1988 ® David P. Russ 1988 The author hereby grants M.I.T. and Hughes Aircraft Company permission to reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics December 18, 1987 Reviewed by C. P. Rubin Hughes Aircraft Company Certified by Professor Walter M. Hollister Thesis Supervjsor, Departmer of Aeronautics and Astronautics .. Accepted by , .AU Professor Harold Y. Wachman Chairman, Depart'rmental Graduate Committee Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics MAY i od ;WITHDRAWfIN i M.I.1W.i..: P. I LBRARt S UBAer 7:Ir_ Aero Analysis of a Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle Design Using Small Liquid Rocket Engines by David P. Russ Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics May, 1988 Abstract The trend in launch vehicle design has been to increase performance by using en- gines of greater and greater complexity, which has a negative effect on cost and reliability. However, a design making use of over 300 small, simple rocket engines can deliver over 340,000 lbs to low Earth orbit. This design, derived by using the rocket equations to size the major components, features a 42 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego History Center Is a Museum, Education Center, and Research Library Founded As the San Diego Historical Society in 1928
    The Journal of San Diego Volume 58 Fall 2012 Number 4 • The Journal of San Diego Number History 2012 58 Fall Volume History Publication of The Journal of San Diego History is underwritten by a major grant from the Quest for Truth Foundation, established by the late James G. Scripps. Additional support is provided by “The Journal of San Diego History Fund” of the San Diego Foundation and private donors. The color section for the Charles Reiffel Exhibit Review has been underwritten by Thompson Fetter. The San Diego History Center is a museum, education center, and research library founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928. Its activities are supported by: the City of San Diego’s Commission for Arts and Culture; the County of San Diego; individuals; foundations; corporations; fundraising events; membership dues; admissions; shop sales; and rights and reproduction fees. Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life. The paper in the publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Science-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Front Cover: Charles Reiffel, San Diego Harbor. Oil on Canvas, 1936. The San Diego History Center on loan from the Fine Arts Program, Public Building Services, US General Administration, commissioned through the New Deal art projects. Charles Reiffel: An American Post-Impressionist, Catalogue No. 63. Back Cover: Charles Reiffel, detail from History of San Diego—Colonial, 1939. The San Diego History Center, gift of Donna Sefton. Cover Design: Allen Wynar The Journal of San Diego History IRIS H.
    [Show full text]
  • Catching up in the Moon Race by Andrew J
    Catching Up in the Moon Race by Andrew J. LePage December 15, 1999 Introduction recognized that an ICBM was a feasible weapon. The Atlas made use of an innovative stage-and-a-half Before NASA was founded in October of 1958, the design where a pair of booster engines were USAF had ambitous plans for space exploration. jettisoned after they were no longer needed during During the national debate that followed the launch ascent. A sustainer engine would then push the of Sputnik, the USAF was trying to position itself so payload towards its target feeding off of the that it could dominate the nation's infant space remaining propellants in the missile's lightweight program. Even after the Advanced Research Projects integral propellant tanks that used internal pressure to Agency (ARPA) was founded in February of 1958 maintain the stiffness of the missile. The first model, and given the task of coordinating America's military Atlas A, only used the pair of booster engines to send space programs, USAF efforts and plans figured the rocket on an abbreviated test flight. Atlas 4A prominently. made the first test flight on June 11, 1957 but failed. The first successful test, Atlas 12A, came on The USAF's first step beyond the Earth orbit was a December 17 of that year. lunar exploration program approved by President Eisenhower as part Operation Mona on March 27, The next model, the Atlas B, had a full complement 1958 (see Operation Mona: America's First Moon of engines and would test the complete weapon Program in the April 1998 issue of SpaceViews).
    [Show full text]
  • Type Rating of an Aircraft, Compare the Aircraft Model from Block 2 of the Airworthiness Certificate to the Civil Model Designation Column Below
    FAA Order 8900.1, Volume 5, Chapter 2, Section 19 06/28/2021 FIGURE 5-88, PILOT CERTIFICATE AIRCRAFT TYPE DESIGNATIONS – AIRPLANE NOTE: 1. As of November 2015 the FAA has begun removing marketing names from the Civil Model Designation column. When determining the appropriate type rating of an aircraft, compare the aircraft model from Block 2 of the Airworthiness Certificate to the Civil Model Designation column below. The column titled Current Type Rating Designation will show the appropriate type rating for this aircraft. EQUIVALENT CURRENT TYPE TYPE CERTIFICATE CIVIL MODEL PRIOR MODEL MILITARY RATING HOLDER DESIGNATION DESIGNATION DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 328 Support Services GmbH Dornier 328-100 C-146A DO-328 Dornier 328-300 None D328JET Aero Commander Division (See Israel Aircraft Industries None Ltd.) Aérospatiale, France SN 601 Corvette None SN-601 Aérospatiale/Aeritalia, France (See ATR – GIE Avions de None Transport Régional) Airbus A340-200 Series: None A-340 Models: A340-211, -212, -213 A340-300 Series: Models: A340-311, -312, -313 A340-500 Series: Models: A340-541 A340-600 Series: Models: A340-642 Airbus Canada Limited BD-500-1A10 None BD500 Partnership BD-500-1A11 Airbus Defense and Space S.A. Model: C-212-CB, C-212-CC, None CA-212 C-212-CD, C-212-CE, C-212-CF, C-212-DF, C-212-DE Model CN-235, CN-235 CN-235 Series C-295 CN-235-100, CN-235-200, CN-235-300, C-295 Airbus SAS A300, Model B2-1A None A-300 A300, Model B2-1C A300, Model B4-2C A300, Model B2K-3C A300, Model B4-103 A300, Model B2-203 A300, Model B4-203 A300, Model B4-601
    [Show full text]
  • Idfflt Annual Report 1957-1958 ;
    * iDfflT annual report 1957-1958 ; f Annual Report for the Fiscal Year October 1— September 30 SAS OPERATIONS - GENERAL SAS one of the very first international carriers to op­ erate a fully modern medium-range jet fleet, which will SAS operations have shown a certain increase during successively go into service in 1959 and 1960. the fiscal year 1957-58. The production increase has, Extensive efforts have been made to counteract the con ­ however, been less pronounced than during the pre­ tinuous increase of production costs. In this connection, ceding fiscal year. the advantages of closer co-operation with other airlines The modernization of the fleet has continued. Three have been carefully studied. Negotiations with the additional Douglas DC-7Cs and four Convair Metro ­ Swiss carrier Swissair during the spring and summer politans have gone into operation, while older equipment 1958 have resulted in an agreement between SAS and has been sold. The modification program for the DC-6 Swissair concerning a co-ordinated equipment policy, a fleet has been completed. The costs for this program, distribution between the carriers of maintenance work which has been carried out during the last two fiscal for their future jet fleets, and a close co-operation in years, have been charged to the operations of the re­ every respect in the technical and operational fields. spective years. Under this agreement, SAS will, in 1960, obtain a new The operational results for 1957-58 have, to a certain type of jet aircraft by leasing a number of four-engine extent, been influenced by the economic recession dur­ Convair 880s from Swissair.
    [Show full text]