Evolutionary and Ecological Aspects of Some Antarctic and Sub-Antarctic Penguin Distributions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolutionary and Ecological Aspects of Some Antarctic and Sub-Antarctic Penguin Distributions Oecologia (2002) 130:485–495 DOI 10.1007/s00442-001-0836-x REVIEW Gerald L. Kooyman Evolutionary and ecological aspects of some Antarctic and sub-Antarctic penguin distributions Received: 24 May 2001 / Accepted: 27 September 2001 / Published online: 13 November 2001 © Springer-Verlag 2001 Abstract Penguins probably originated in the core of edge. Less is known about penguins during the pelagic Gondwanaland when South America, Africa, and Ant- phase between breeding cycles. What we do know is sur- arctica were just beginning to separate. As the continents prising in regard to their dispersal, which ranges from drifted apart, the division filled with what became the hundreds to thousands of kilometers from the breeding southern ocean. One of the remaining land masses colonies. moved south and was caught at the pole by the Earth’s rotation. It became incrusted with ice and is now known Keywords Aptenodytes · Eudyptes · Platform transmitter as East Antarctica. Linking it to South America was a terminal · Pygoscelis · Time-depth recorder series of submerged mountain ranges that formed a neck- lace of islands. The northern portion of the necklace, called the Scotia Arc, is now the “fertile crescent” of the Introduction Southern Ocean. The greatest numbers and biomass of penguins are found here as well as that of krill, the pri- Penguins are one of the oldest, most aquatic, and argu- mary prey species of most penguins, and many other ably most mystifying groups of birds. Their adaptation to marine predators. Today penguins are found throughout the sea was most likely a conversion from a procellariid the sub-Antarctic islands and around the entire Antarctic type of flying bird, such as a diving petrel (Simpson continent. Using satellite transmitters and time-depth re- 1976), to flying underwater, as modern penguins do. corders, while taking advantage of the parental dedica- There is no cladogram for penguins at the present time tion of breeding birds, numerous investigators have de- (Fordyce and Jones 1990). Most classification schemes scribed foraging habits of several species of penguins. are based on morphological characters. The exception is The information obtained is labor intensive and costly so the DNA-hybridization study used for the biochemical that studies are restricted to certain species, areas and classification of birds by Sibley and Ahlquist (1990). seasons. Here I review the patterns evident among six of Biochemical evidence indicates a much more detailed the most abundant and completely studied of the pen- classification with the addition of infraclasses, parvclass- guins. The variation in behavior is considerable from es and so on. The major difference from the classifica- those species that seldom dive deeper than 20 m in tion of other authors (Mayr and Amadon 1951; Cracraft search of prey to those that will dive to depths >500 m to 1981) is the placement of penguins in the order Ciconii- catch mesopelagic fish and squid. Foraging trips from formes rather than Sphenisciformes (Sibley and Ahlquist breeding colonies vary among species and with the sea- 1990). In the Sibley/Ahlquist classification, the order son. Often the birds travel no more than 30 km and at Ciconiiformes includes 1,027 species of birds. other times the trips may exceed 600 km. Sub-Antarctic Fossil evidence places the origin of penguins at least species often reach more productive waters near or with- in the Eocene (Fordyce and Jones 1990), and Simpson in the Antarctic Polar Front zone, where the mixing of suggests the origin was likely as early as the Cretaceous Antarctic and sub-Antarctic waters provide rich resourc- (Simpson 1976). The hybridization evidence agrees with es for their prey. Antarctic species usually remain close a divergence from procellarids about 47 million years to shore, along the continental slope, or near the sea ice ago (mya) (Sibley and Ahlquist 1990). All fossil locali- ties are in the present range of penguins, but conditions G.L. Kooyman (✉) have changed considerably. Over the past 50 million Scholander Hall, 0204, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA years the continental land masses have shifted and frag- e-mail: [email protected] mented (Fig. 1). Presumably the birds evolved on the Fax: +1-858-5641305 edge of the continental land mass of Gondwanaland, but 486 tinent and adjacent waters became colder. The ultimate conclusion of this drift occurred when Antarctica reached its present position, South America and Austra- lia assumed their separation from Antarctica and the cir- cumpolar Southern Ocean formed and cooled (Eastman 1993; Knox 1994). Penguin diving ability enables some of them to forage at depths unavailable to other sea birds, but it is with some sacrifice. Their flightlessness has placed important restrictions on their distribution. Awkward on land, and relatively defenseless against even moderately sized terrestrial predators, their breeding habitat is restricted, with few exceptions, to cold temperate islands or isolated shorelines of the island continents of Australia and Ant- arctica. Only the Emperor Penguin, by breeding on sea ice, has separated itself completely from the terrestrial habitat. As the southern seas cooled, only two species evolved in ways to cope with high latitude conditions: the Emperor Penguin and Adélie Penguin. In large part, the other 15 species of penguins are associated with New Zealand, South Africa, Australia, southern South America, and islands of the sub-Antarctic region. This review will address penguin foraging behavior during the critical time when constrained by the need to provide food to rapidly growing chicks. During incuba- tion of the egg and nurturing of the chick, penguins share duties, which change from long periods at sea during in- cubation to shorter periods as the chick matures and its Fig. 1 Distribution of the continents about 100 million years ago food requirements increase. If the foraging trip of the (mya) when Gondwanaland was separating (top), and at about 60 mya (bottom), shortly before the earliest known fossil penguin partner is too long, the mate will abandon the egg or of 50 mya. The hatched area represents the central region where brooded chick. Even when the chick no longer needs its penguins probably evolved parent’s physical protection, an exceptionally long fast because of a delayed return by the adults will result in the weakening of the chick. If it does not starve, it may there is no evidence of the location of their origin be killed by nearby colony predators such as skuas (Fordyce and Jones 1990). Most likely penguins fre- (Catharacta spp.) or giant petrels (Macronectes spp.). To quented near-shore islands which gave them protection maintain the chick’s condition it is vital that the parents’ from any continental predators that may have existed. foraging trips to sea become increasingly successful as With few exceptions they continue to enjoy (and require) the chick matures. High food intake is necessary to this isolation. Over the course of tens of millions of maintain body condition adequate to discourage preda- years penguins differentiated into many more species tors, to enhance overall growth and feather development, than exist today. There are 17 extant species, and 32 and therefore encourage the molt of the down and ulti- known extinct species (Simpson 1976). Incidentally, this mately the chick’s independent departure to sea. ratio is similar to that of the great avian diversity loss apparent in the Pleistocene. Over the course of 2 million years of great climatic changes, the number of species Tracking penguin foraging patterns declined by half to the present-day number of more than 9,600 species (Brodkorb 1971, as cited in Proctor and Perhaps the most significant technical advance in the Lynch 1993). Some of the earlier penguin species study of the behavior of marine birds and mammals at were probably substantially larger than the present-day sea has been the ability to track their movements with giant, the Emperor Penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri), which platform transmitting terminals (PTT). These transmit- is twice the mass of its congener the King Penguin ters are tuned to a nominal frequency of 401.650 MHz. (A. patagonicus) and 30 times the mass of the smallest They range in mass from about 150 to 400 g. Much of present-day penguin, the Little Penguin (Eudyptula this mass results from the thick casting necessary to minor). withstand pressures that occur when aquatic animals Penguins spread to many islands of the southern seas, dive to depth. The linear dimensions also vary with the as well as the southern continental coastlines of South size and number of batteries needed. A typical size is America, Africa and Australia. During this time the con- about 5 cm wide by 4 cm thick and 15 cm long. These 487 Table 1 Summary of the annual cycle and foraging range during conservative. Phase durations are the underlined values that are each phase of the cycle. Body mass is the average for the male and first in columns 3–7. Distances in kilometers are the bold last val- female parent during the crèche stage if reported. Unknown dis- ues of columns 3–8. References are cited by number in column 9, tances are indicated with a question mark. Dispersal patterns are and defined in the note below the table. The time and duration of just being determined by various means and the data presented are the cycles are from Williams (1995) Species; Breeding Incubation Guard Creche Fledging Molt Winter Referencesa mass (kg) dispersal Macaroni, Oct/Nov 35/Nov– 25/Dec– 35/Jan/ 60/Feb/? 25/Mar/ Apr–Sep/? (1) Eudyptes Dec/400 Jan/30 50 Colony chrysolophus; 4.6, 3.9 Royal, Sep/Oct 35/Oct– 21/Dec/ 43/Jan– 65/Feb/? 26/Feb–Mar/ Apr–Sep/? (2) E.
Recommended publications
  • A Global Population Assessment of the Chinstrap Penguin (Pygoscelis
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A global population assessment of the Chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica) Noah Strycker1*, Michael Wethington2, Alex Borowicz2, Steve Forrest2, Chandi Witharana3, Tom Hart4 & Heather J. Lynch2,5 Using satellite imagery, drone imagery, and ground counts, we have assembled the frst comprehensive global population assessment of Chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) at 3.42 (95th-percentile CI: [2.98, 4.00]) million breeding pairs across 375 extant colonies. Twenty-three previously known Chinstrap penguin colonies are found to be absent or extirpated. We identify fve new colonies, and 21 additional colonies previously unreported and likely missed by previous surveys. Limited or imprecise historical data prohibit our assessment of population change at 35% of all Chinstrap penguin colonies. Of colonies for which a comparison can be made to historical counts in the 1980s, 45% have probably or certainly declined and 18% have probably or certainly increased. Several large colonies in the South Sandwich Islands, where conditions apparently remain favorable for Chinstrap penguins, cannot be assessed against a historical benchmark. Our population assessment provides a detailed baseline for quantifying future changes in Chinstrap penguin abundance, sheds new light on the environmental drivers of Chinstrap penguin population dynamics in Antarctica, and contributes to ongoing monitoring and conservation eforts at a time of climate change and concerns over declining krill abundance in the Southern Ocean. Chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) are abundant in Antarctica, with past estimates ranging from 3–8 million breeding pairs, and are considered a species of “least concern” by BirdLife International1, but the popula- tion dynamics of this species are not well understood and several studies have highlighted signifcant declines at monitored sites2–6.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing UAV Monitoring of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands’ Iconic Land-Based Marine Predators
    fmars-08-654215 May 26, 2021 Time: 18:32 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 01 June 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.654215 Developing UAV Monitoring of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands’ Iconic Land-Based Marine Predators John Dickens1*, Philip R. Hollyman1, Tom Hart2, Gemma V. Clucas3, Eugene J. Murphy1, Sally Poncet4, Philip N. Trathan1 and Martin A. Collins1 1 British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 3 Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States, 4 South Georgia Survey, Stanley, Falkland Islands Many remote islands present barriers to effective wildlife monitoring in terms of Edited by: challenging terrain and frequency of visits. The sub-Antarctic islands of South Georgia Wen-Cheng Wang, National Taiwan Normal University, and the South Sandwich Islands are home to globally significant populations of seabirds Taiwan and marine mammals. South Georgia hosts the largest breeding populations of Antarctic Reviewed by: fur seals, southern elephant seals and king penguins as well as significant populations of Gisele Dantas, wandering, black-browed and grey-headed albatross. The island also holds important Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Brazil populations of macaroni and gentoo penguins. The South Sandwich Islands host the Sofie Pollin, world’s largest colony of chinstrap penguins in addition to major populations of Adélie KU Leuven Research & Development, Belgium and macaroni penguins. A marine protected area was created around these islands in *Correspondence: 2012 but monitoring populations of marine predators remains a challenge, particularly John Dickens as these species breed over large areas in remote and often inaccessible locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Playful Penguins by Melissa Michael
    Playful Penguins By Melissa Michael www.teachertreasurehunter.blogspot.com •Emperor Penguin •King Penguin •Gentoo Penguin •Macaroni Penguin •Adélie Penguin •Little Penguin Emperor Penguin HABITAT: The emperor penguin lives in the Antarctic. It will spend its entire life in the Antarctic waters and on the ice. They are never on land. FOOD: They mostly eat Antarctic silverfish. They may also eat krill or squid. PREDATORS: Their main enemies are orcas and leopard seals. The chicks are also prey for sea birds. COOL FACTS: *The females lay one large egg and then the males take care of it. The males keep the egg on their feet and cover it with their brooding pouch. The brooding pouch is Credit: Photo by Lin Padgham; Creative Commons license loose skin covered with feathers that can APPEARANCE: The emperor penguin has cover the egg. The males will not eat black feathers on its back. The feathers in anything for the 2 months when they care front are white. They have a black head for the egg. and black beak with an orange stripe. *They are the largest penguin in the world. There are yellow patches on each side of its They are about 44 inches tall. head. The chicks have gray feathers with a *They can dive deeper than any other black and white face patch. bird. © 2013 © 2013 Michael Melissa King Penguin HABITAT: They live on islands of the sub- Antarctic and ice-free ocean waters. They never live on pack ice like their close relative the Emperor penguin. FOOD: They eat small fish and some squid.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Behavior of Gentoo and Chinstrap Penguins As Determined by New Radiotelemetry Techniques
    FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF GENTOO AND CHINSTRAP PENGUINS AS DETERMINED BY NEW RADIOTELEMETRY TECHNIQUES WAYNE Z. TRIVELPIECE,JOHN L. BENGTSON,1 SUSAN G. TRIVELPIECE, AND NICHOLAS J. VOLKMAN PointReyes Bird Observatory, 4990 Shoreline Highway, Stinson Beach, California 94970 USA ASSTRACT.--Analysisof radio signalsfrom transmittersaffixed to 7 Gentoo(Pygoscelis papua) and 6 Chinstrap (P. antarctica)penguins allowed us to track penguins at sea. Signal charac- teristics allowed us to distinguish among 5 foraging behaviors: porpoising, underwater swimming, horizontal diving, vertical diving, and restingor bathing. GentooPenguins spent a significantly greater portion of their foraging trips engaged in feeding behaviors than Chinstraps,which spent significantly more time traveling. Gentooshad significantly longer feeding dives than Chinstraps(128 s vs. 91 s) and significantlyhigher dive-pauseratios (3.4 vs. 2.6). These differencesin foraging behavior suggestGentoo and Chinstrappenguins may have different diving abilities and may forage at different depths. Received3 June 1985, accepted24 April 1986. THE trophic relationships among Pygoscelis among behaviors during foraging trips. This penguins,the Ad61ie(P. adeliae),Chinstrap (P. method improved our understanding of pen- antarctica),and Gentoo (P. papua),have been a guin feeding efficiencies,ranges, and traveling major focal point of researchin recent years, speeds,and permitted preliminary compari- particularlywith respectto the ecologyof their sons of Gentoo and Chinstrap penguin forag- major prey species,krill (Euphausiasuperba). To ing behaviors. date, however, our knowledge of the birds' METHODS feeding ecologyis largely derived from stom- ach samples obtained ashore (Emison 1968; This studywas conductedat a breedingrookery at Croxall and Furse 1980; Croxall and Prince Point Thomas, King George Island, South Shetland 1980a;Volkman et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Penguins: up Close and Personal
    Penguins: Up Close and Personal Penguins: Up Close and Personal by ReadWorks A penguin is a type of bird that lives in water and on land. The black-and-white appearance of penguins is known as countershading, which is a form of camouflage that helps keep them safe in the water. Wild penguins are found only in the Southern Hemisphere. Most live within the polar region in very cold climates around Antarctica; however, some species of penguins live in warmer climates in South Africa, New Zealand, and some countries in South America. While there are over 17 different types of penguins, this passage will focus on only three: the emperor penguin, the king penguin, and the little blue penguin. The biggest of all penguins, the emperor penguin, is almost three-and-a-half feet tall-that is almost as tall as the average first grader! And they can weigh up to 88 pounds. Incredibly, emperor penguins breed on the ice in Antarctica during winter. They face temperatures of -22 ReadWorks.org · © 2013 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved. Penguins: Up Close and Personal degrees Fahrenheit and below. After the female lays an egg, the male keeps the egg warm and protects it for a period of two months-during which time he doesn't eat at all! The female makes a hunting trip for those two months, sometimes traveling up to 50 miles to reach the ocean. When she returns, she regurgitates food for the chick, and then the male goes and finds food for himself. In the wild, emperor penguins live 15 to 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Sentinels of the Ocean the Science of the World’S Penguins
    A scientific report from The Pew Charitable Trusts April 2015 Sentinels Of the Ocean The science of the world’s penguins Contents 1 Overview 1 Status of penguin populations 1 Penguin biology Species 3 22 The Southern Ocean 24 Threats to penguins Fisheries 24 Increasing forage fisheries 24 Bycatch 24 Mismatch 24 Climate change 25 Habitat degradation and changes in land use 25 Petroleum pollution 25 Guano harvest 26 Erosion and loss of native plants 26 Tourism 26 Predation 26 Invasive predators 26 Native predators 27 Disease and toxins 27 27 Protecting penguins Marine protected areas 27 Ecosystem-based management 29 Ocean zoning 29 Habitat protections on land 30 31 Conclusion 32 References This report was written for Pew by: Pablo García Borboroglu, Ph.D., president, Global Penguin Society P. Dee Boersma, Ph.D., director, Center for Penguins as Ocean Sentinels, University of Washington Caroline Cappello, Center for Penguins as Ocean Sentinels, University of Washington Pew’s environmental initiative Joshua S. Reichert, executive vice president Tom Wathen, vice president Environmental science division Becky Goldburg, Ph.D., director, environmental science Rachel Brittin, officer, communications Polita Glynn, director, Pew Marine Fellows Program Ben Shouse, senior associate Charlotte Hudson, director, Lenfest Ocean Program Anthony Rogers, senior associate Katie Matthews, Ph.D., manager Katy Sater, senior associate Angela Bednarek, Ph.D., manager Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank the many contributors to Penguins: Natural History and Conservation (University of Washington Press, 2013), upon whose scholarship this report is based. Used by permission of the University of Washington Press The environmental science team would like to thank Dee Boersma, Pablo “Popi” Borboroglu, and Caroline Cappello for sharing their knowledge of penguins by writing and preparing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Behaviour of the Chinstrap Penguin 85
    1999 Wilson & Peters: Foraging behaviour of the Chinstrap Penguin 85 FORAGING BEHAVIOUR OF THE CHINSTRAP PENGUIN PYGOSCELIS ANTARCTICA AT ARDLEY ISLAND, ANTARCTICA RORY P. WILSON & GERRIT PETERS Institut für Meereskunde an der Universität Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, D-24105 Kiel, Germany ([email protected]) SUMMARY WILSON, R.P. & PETERS, G. 1999. Foraging behaviour of the Chinstrap Penguin Pygoscelis antarctica at Ardley Island, Antarctica. Marine Ornithology 27: 85–95. The foraging behaviour of 20 Chinstrap Penguins Pygoscelis antarctica breeding at Ardley Island, King George Island, Antarctica was studied during the austral summers of 1991/2 and 1995/6 using stomach tem- perature loggers (to determine feeding patterns), depth recorders and multiple channel loggers. The multi- ple channel loggers recorded dive depth, swim speed and swim heading which could be integrated using vectors to determine the foraging tracks. Half the birds left the island to forage between 02h00 and 10h00. Mean time at sea was 10.6 h. Birds generally executed a looping type course with most individuals foraging within 20 km of the island. Maximum foraging range was 33.5 km. Maximum dive depth was 100.7 m although 80% of all dives had depth maxima less than 30 m. The following dive parameters were positively related to maximum depth reached during the dive: total dive duration, descent duration, duration at the bottom of the dive, ascent duration, descent angle, ascent angle, rate of change of depth during descent and rate of change of depth during ascent. Swim speed was unrelated to maximum dive depth and had mean values of 2.6, 2.5 and 2.2 m/s for the descent, bottom and ascent phases of the dive.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Research 39:293
    Vol. 39: 293–302, 2019 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published August 22 https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00970 Endang Species Res OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Sexual and geographic dimorphism in northern rockhopper penguins breeding in the South Atlantic Ocean Antje Steinfurth1,2,*,**, Jenny M. Booth3,**, Jeff White4, Alexander L. Bond5,6, Christopher D. McQuaid3 1FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa 2RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, David Attenborough Building, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 3QZ, UK 3Coastal Research Group, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, PO Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa 4Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755, USA 5RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire SG19 2DL, UK 6Bird Group, Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Tring, Hertfordshire HP23 6AP, UK ABSTRACT: The Endangered northern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes moseleyi, like all pen- guins, is monomorphic, making sex determination of individuals in the field challenging. We examined the degree of sexual size dimorphism of adult birds across the species’ breeding range in the Atlantic Ocean and developed discriminant functions (DF) to predict individuals’ sex using morphometric measurements. We found significant site-specific differences in both bill length and bill depth, with males being the larger sex on each island. Across all islands, bill length contri - buted 78% to dissimilarity between sexes. Penguins on Gough Island had significantly longer bills, whilst those from Tristan da Cunha had the deepest. Island-specific DFs correctly classified 82−94% of individuals, and all functions performed significantly better than chance.
    [Show full text]
  • SG and Antarctica Oct2023 Updatedjul2021
    E CHE SEM A N CHEESEMANS’ ECOLOGY SAFARIS E S C 2059 Camden Ave. #419 ’ O San Jose, CA 95124 USA L (800) 527-5330 (408) 741-5330 O G [email protected] Y S cheesemans.com A FA RIS South Georgia and Antarctic Peninsula Earth’s Greatest Wildlife Destination October 19 to November 10, 2023 King Penguin Colony © Hugh Rose SAFARI OVERVIEW Experience the vibrant spring of South Georgia Island and the early season of the Antarctic Peninsula. Beneath the towering, snow-blanketed mountains of South Georgia Island, observe and photograph special wildlife behaviors seldom seen. This time of year is the only time you can find southern elephant seal bulls fight for territories while females nurse young, distinctly marked gray-headed albatross attending to their cliffside nests, and awkward wandering albatross young attempting first flight. You’ll stand amongst vast colonies of king penguins and watch macaroni penguins launching into the ocean. This time of year, the Antarctic Peninsula is in the beginnings of its spring season when the ice in the Weddell Sea can open up, allowing opportunities for lone emperor penguins to wander on ice floes. At penguin colonies, you’ll find penguins courting, setting up nests, and perhaps laying eggs. Through over twenty-five years of experience in the Antarctic, we offer the most in-depth exploration of one of the densest wildlife spectacles found anywhere in the world, and with only 100 passengers, you’ll have ample opportunities to experience this spectacle during every landing and Zodiac cruise. Cheesemans’ Ecology Safaris Page 1 of 19 Updated: July 2021 HIGHLIGHTS • Spend six full days on South Georgia Island and six full days in the Antarctic Peninsula and South Shetland Islands with maximum shore time and Zodiac cruising.
    [Show full text]
  • MARINE ORNITHOLOGY 1999 Proceedings of the Third International Penguin Conference
    Vol. 27MARINE ORNITHOLOGY 1999 Proceedings of the Third International Penguin Conference Contents PREFACE.................................................................................................................................................................................. ii J.P. CROXALL & L.S. DAVIS. Penguins: paradoxes and patterns.................................................................................... 1–12 A.F. CHIARADIA & K.R. KERRY. Daily nest attendance and breeding performance in the Little Penguin Eudyptula minor at Phillip Island, Australia ..............................................................................................................13–20 M. FORTESCUE. Temporal and spatial variation in breeding success of the Little Penguin Eudyptula minor on the east coast of Australia ..........................................................................................................21–28 R. McKAY, C. LALAS, D. McKAY & S. McCONKEY. Nest-site selection by Yellow-eyed Penguins Megadyptes antipodes on grazed farmland .................................................................................................29–35 C.C. ST CLAIR, I.G. McLEAN, J.O. MURIE, S.M. PHILLIPSON & B.J.S. STUDHOLME. Fidelity to nest site and mate in Fiordland Crested Penguins Eudyptes pachyrhynchus .............................................................37–41 J.-B. CHARRASSIN, C.-A. BOST, K. PÜTZ, J. LAGE, T. DAHIER & Y. LE MAHO. Changes in depth utilization in relation to the breeding stage: a case study with the King
    [Show full text]
  • Serengeti of the Southern Ocean
    SOUTH GEORGIA & THE FALKLANDS SERENGETI OF THE SOUTHERN OCEAN ABOARD NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC EXPLORER | 2018-2020 TM If the astonishing sight of some 100,000+ king penguins in one rookery alone were all this expedition offered; if at the end of our time among the kings—observing, listening, photographing, walking among and communing with them—our team said “Show’s over, Folks,” and everyone were to head back home—it’s likely no one would complain, according to all our expedition leaders. It’s that profound and rewarding an experience. BUT THERE’S MORE: THE GREATEST WILDLIFE SPECTACLE ON EARTH. There’s life in such profusion that it boggles your mind as it sends your spirit soaring. Dense colonies of king penguins, fur seals, elephant seals, macaroni and gentoo penguins. Slopes of stunning windward cliffs teeming with grey-headed, black-browed and wandering albatross— nearly a third of all the birds of this species nest here. Plus, there are the rare endemics: the mighty South Georgia pipit, the only songbird in the Antarctic region and South Georgia’s only passerine; and the Falkland’s Johnny rook. (Life-listers take note.) Once a killing ground for whalers, South Georgia is now a sanctuary, an extravagant celebration of wildlife and pristine wildness. We travel with some of the best wildlife photographers on Earth, and even their best photos can’t do this spectacle justice. So, we offer images on the following pages as an invitation—to see it all yourself. TM Cover photo: A pair of adult king penguins amid fuzzy chicks with their dark brown down.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiences at the Volunteer Point Penguin Colony in the Falkland Islands
    Otley: Experiences in nature-based tourism 181 NATURE-BASED TOURISM: EXPERIENCES AT THE VOLUNTEER POINT PENGUIN COLONY IN THE FALKLAND ISLANDS Helen M. Otley Falklands Conservation, PO Box 26, Stanley, Falkland Islands FIQQ 1ZZ, UK ([email protected]) Received 29 March 2005, accepted 30 November 2005 SUMMARY OTLEY, H.M. 2005. Nature-based tourism: experiences at the Volunteer Point penguin colony in the Falkland Islands. Marine Ornithology 33: 181–187. A study was conducted of nature-based tourism, including visitor numbers and use of six visitor attractions, at Volunteer Point, the site of the largest King Penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus colony in the Falkland Islands, from November 2001 to March 2002. Of the 1070 visitors to Volunteer Point, 57% were overseas tourists, 24% were local residents of the islands and 19% were from the British military base, suggesting that Volunteer Point is one of the key land-based sites in the archipelago. Overseas tourists generally stayed for more than three hours at Volunteer Point; island residents and military personnel remained for less than two hours. All visitors spent time at the King Penguin colony, with a mean visit duration of 63 minutes, as compared to the Gentoo Penguin Pygoscelis papua colony, with 50% of visitors and a mean duration of only 19 minutes. The penguin colonies at Volunteer Point received less visitor exposure in terms of visitor person–hours than did a penguin colony on the Antarctic Peninsula. Volunteer Beach was the second most popular attraction at Volunteer Point. The popularity of non-wildlife attractions highlights the need for visitor management to incorporate the entire site and not just wildlife colonies.
    [Show full text]