DOCSLIB.ORG

Ihfr00p28-488

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ihfr00p28-488 Turkey IHF FOCUS: Freedom of expression and Freedom of Expression and the media; freedom of association and the Media peaceful assembly; judicial system, the in- dependence of the judiciary and fair trial; Freedom of Expression torture, ill-treatment and misconduct by law enforcement officials; conditions in There was a general awareness on behalf prisons and detentions facilities; death of the government that legislation and penalty; protection of ethnic minorities; practice both restricted the expression of human rights defenders. opinions or criticism that was seen as of- fending certain state policies. Public de- bate – particularly on issues touching The human rights situation in Turkey saw upon the Kurdish minority, Islam or the se- no major changes in 1999. Freedom of ex- curity forces – was suppressed as “terrorist pression was seriously restricted, and it re- propaganda” or as an attempt to “insult mained dangerous to write on issues such and weaken the state organs” (article 159 as the situation of the Kurdish minority, the of the penal code). Criticism of the gov- armed forces and Islam. Journalists were ernment’s policies on the Kurds or other harassed and prosecuted on dubious minorities was not officially acknowl- charges. Freedom of association was limit- edged, and teaching and publishing in the ed, although the spectrum of NGOs and minority languages, or writing on Islam or political parties was diverse. any other religion, was deemed to “incite hatred among people” (article 312 of the There continued to be violations of the penal code), or more directly, to “dissemi- right to a fair trial. The State Security nate separatist propaganda” (article 8 of Courts continued to operate and hand the anti-terror law).1 down heavy sentences for questionable “crimes.” Torture and ill-treatment re- A ruling by the General Penal Board of the mained amongst the most serious human Supreme Court of Appeal in May 1999 in- rights problems. The capture of the Kur- creased the sentences regarding freedom dish Workers’ Party leader, Abdullah of opinion, commuting an accusation of Öcalan, triggered an intense debate on the “disseminating the propaganda of illegal death penalty, which remained in Turkish organizations through the media” into legislation. The government did not take “aiding or abetting terrorist organizations.” any systematic measures to improve the This decision also stipulated that those situation of the Kurds, and continued to journalists and writers tried under article violate the rights of other minorities, in- 7(2) of the anti-terror law could now be cluding the Greeks and the Armenians. tried under article 169 of the penal code, Human rights monitors, as well as lawyers which provided for heavier prison sen- and doctors involved in human rights tences of up to five years. work, continued to be harassed for their legitimate activities. Turkey, a country which recognizes the ju- risdiction of the European Court of Human Rights, lost all 18 cases to which it was a party in 1999, and was fined nearly U.S.$ 3 million. Most of the cases per- tained to free expression crimes that had occurred in the early 1990’s. 1 Human Rights Association (HRA) and Human Rights Foundation of Turkey (HRFT), Briefing on Human Rights in Turkey, OSCE Review Conference Istanbul, November 9, 1999. 359 Turkey In March, the President of the Constitu- in January, and the pro-Kurdish Özgür tional Court, Ahmet Necdet Sezer, called Bakis was banned in April. Other publica- for the lifting of restrictions on freedom of tions were also banned.5 expression, including language rights – thus stimulating a lively debate on human ■ In June, journalist Nadire Mater’s book – rights and government policies. In Septem- entitled “Mehmet’s Book: Soldiers Who ber, at the official opening of the judicial Have Fought in the Southeast Speak Out” year and in the presence of the president – was banned and confiscated for “insult- and the prime minister, the President of ing and weakening the army.” The book the Appeal Court, Dr. Sami Selcuk, said contained statements by recruited soldiers that the constitution enjoyed “almost zero” on their experiences in fighting in south- legitimacy and should be replaced. He ex- eastern Turkey. In September, the govern- pressed the hope that Turkey would not ment began proceedings against Mater enter the 21st century under a regime that and her publisher. She faces a six-year continued to “crush minds and stifle voic- prison sentence if convicted.6 es”.2 ■ In May, the Istanbul State Security Court Freedom of the Media sentenced Cumhuriyet columnist Oral Calislar to 13 months imprisonment for Domestic and foreign periodicals that pro- disseminating separatist propaganda in a vided a broad spectrum of views and opin- book he wrote that was based on previ- ions, including intense criticism of the ously published interviews with Abdullah government, were widely available. Most Öcalan, the leader of the Kurdish Workers’ of the largest TV stations and newspapers Party (PKK) and Kemal Burkay, head of the were monopolized despite legal provi- Socialist Party of Kurdistan.7 He had sions against monopolization.3 planned to appeal the decision, but his sentence was suspended under a new law. According to the Human Rights Founda- tion of Turkey (HRFT), the Turkish media ■ Istanbul Mayor Recep Tayyip Erdogan frequently applied self-censorship and it was released from prison in July after hav- was nearly impossible to report on human ing served a four-and-a-half-month sen- rights violations and situations regarding tence for a speech he made in 1997 that the Kurdish issue in an objective and inde- was deemed to have “incited ethnic, pendent manner.4 One important restraint racial, and religious enmity”, based on ar- in that respect was the banning of journal- ticle 312 of the penal code. His sentence, ists from a large number of towns and vil- which was reduced from ten months, in- lages. cluded a lifetime ban from politics.8 ■ In the state of emergency region, the The High Board of Radio and Television left-wing newspaper Evrensel was banned (RTÜK), which was created in 1994 to reg- 2 Human Rights Watch, World Report 2000; HRFT, Human Rights Yesterday & Today, 7 September 1999. 3 HRFT, Human Rights Situation in Turkey: New Trends, 17 February 2000. 4 Ibid. 5 Human Rights Watch, World Report 2000. 6 Ibid., HRFT, Human Rights Yesterday & Today, 25 June 1999; International Press Institute (IPI), 1999 World Press Freedom Review. 7 HRFT, Human Rights Yesterday & Today, 19 May 1999. 8 HRFT, Human Rights Yesterday & Today, 26 July 1999. 360 Turkey ulate private television and radio frequen- ■ During the November OSCE Review cies, suspended the broadcasting of a Conference in Istanbul, several journalists number of radio stations for periods rang- working at leftist or pro-Kurdish publica- ing from one day to one year, usually be- tions were detained. Some of them were cause they had allegedly violated laws allegedly ill-treated at the hands of po- prohibiting the broadcast of “separatist lice.12 propaganda.” Law on Suspending Sentences ■ The Istanbul radio station FOREKS was banned from broadcasting for 30 days as In September, the government passed leg- of October 30 for having rebroadcast a islation suspending for three years the sen- program of the BBC’s Turkish-language tences of those convicted of freedom of service on Kurdish issues.9 expression crimes in the media – including journalists, writers, and party officials who ■ During its October 6 meeting, the RTÜK published articles. The Islamic Fazilet suspended five television stations and four party challenged the constitutionality of radio stations for a total of 225 days. Dur- the law because it did not apply to those ing an October 13 meeting, four television who had committed similar crimes stations and four radio stations were sus- through speech. For example, lawyer and pended for 311 days.10 human rights activist Esber Yagmurdereli remained in prison because his 1998 con- Journalists, including those from main- viction was based on a speech he gave at stream and Western media, were periodi- a 1991 HRA meeting13. Hasan Celal cally harassed and subjected to police Güzel, head of the small Rebirth Party abuse while covering stories, particularly (YDP) and a former Education Minister, in the Southeast. began serving a one-year sentence for a speech he gave in 1997. Moreover, ■ On February 23, two journalists from charges were only dropped if the journal- Diyarbakir; cameraman Ibrahim Atesoglu ists or writers agreed not to commit the from the private TV channel NTV; and re- same crime again within a three-year peri- porter Adnan Simsek from the Ihlas (IHA) od. This decision amounted to compulso- press agency were severely beaten by ry self-censorship. In addition, the law did eight police officers on their way to the not provide for acquittals, i.e. the writers scene of confrontations between striking had no opportunity to clear their names or shopkeepers and law enforcement officers. to fight bans imposed on their written They were violently hit with rifles. The po- work.14 lice then ran over Atesoglu, who had been lying on the ground. He suffered serious The law led to the release of over 25 per- head injuries, and his colleague needed sons, and the suspension of hundreds of stitches.11 trials. 9 HRFT, Human Rights Yesterday & Today, 1 November 1999; International Press Institute (IPI), 1999 World Press Freedom Review. 10 International Press Institute (IPI), 1999 World Press Freedom Review. 11 Ibid. 12 HRFT, Human Rights Yesterday & Today, 11 November 1999. 13 See also IHF Annual Report 1999. 14 Human Rights Watch, op.cit. 361 Turkey ■ Author Ismail Besikci, imprisoned since over 3 years to protest the disappearances 1993, was released in September under of their relatives, ceased their gatherings in the law suspending the sentences of jour- March in the face of ongoing police ha- nalists.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reconciling Statism with Freedom: Turkey's Kurdish Opening
    Reconciling Statism with Freedom Turkey’s Kurdish Opening Halil M. Karaveli SILK ROAD PAPER October 2010 Reconciling Statism with Freedom Turkey’s Kurdish Opening Halil M. Karaveli © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodav. 2, Stockholm-Nacka 13130, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Reconciling Statism with Freedom: Turkey’s Kurdish Opening” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, and ad- dresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse commu- nity of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lec- tures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public dis- cussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study are those of the authors only, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Joint Center or its sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity, Interest, and Politics
    INTERNATIONAL MAX PLANCK RESEARCH SCHOOL on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy Köln, Germany Azer Kiliç Identity, Interest, and Politics The Rise of Kurdish Associational Activism and the Contestation of the State in Turkey Studies on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy Azer Kiliç Identity, Interest, and Politics The Rise of Kurdish Associational Activism and the Contestation of the State in Turkey © Azer Kiliç, 2013 Published by IMPRS-SPCE International Max Planck Research School on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy, Cologne http://imprs.mpifg.de ISBN: 978-3-946416-03-6 DOI: 10.17617/2.1857884 Studies on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy are published online on http://imprs.mpifg.de. Go to Dissertation Series. Studies on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy Abstract This dissertation investigates associational behaviour in a context of eth- nic conflict and contestation of the state. With a case study of the Kurd- ish issue in Turkey, it examines the position of interest associations in the major Kurdish province of Diyarbakır in relation to political struggles be- tween different models of social integration by exploring the relative weight of economic interests and collective identity politics in influencing associational strategies. This examination draws on the theoretical litera- ture on interest associations and their impact on social order and democ- racy. In particular, the analysis adopts the framework of Streeck and Schmitter to understand the logic of associational action by looking at the environments of membership and influence. The analysis, however, modifies this framework by emphasizing the duality seen within both en- vironments, as well as the transitional context that the contestation of the state and socio-economic changes contribute to.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kurdish Issue in June 2011 Elections: Continuity Or Change in Turkey's Democratization?
    Turkish Studies ISSN: 1468-3849 (Print) 1743-9663 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ftur20 The Kurdish Issue in June 2011 Elections: Continuity or Change in Turkey's Democratization? Nil S. Satana To cite this article: Nil S. Satana (2012) The Kurdish Issue in June 2011 Elections: Continuity or Change in Turkey's Democratization?, Turkish Studies, 13:2, 169-189, DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2012.686575 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2012.686575 Published online: 06 Jun 2012. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 695 View related articles Citing articles: 3 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ftur20 Download by: [Bilkent University] Date: 29 August 2017, At: 02:17 Turkish Studies Vol. 13, No. 2, 169–189, June 2012 The Kurdish Issue in June 2011 Elections: Continuity or Change in Turkey’s Democratization? NIL S. SATANA Department of International Relations, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey ABSTRACT This article analyzes the Kurdish issue in various aspects before the June 2011 elections. The main research questions include what constitutes the major grievances of the Kurds; how the ongoing conflict is framed as “Kurdish issue” versus a “terrorism problem” and how major political parties in Turkey approach the issue and its solution in their 2011 election manifestos and rallies. This article contributes the literature on the Kurdish issue in particular and Turkey’s democratic consolidation in general by identifying the problems and political views of all relevant sides.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who in Politics in Turkey
    WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY Sarıdemir Mah. Ragıp Gümüşpala Cad. No: 10 34134 Eminönü/İstanbul Tel: (0212) 522 02 02 - Faks: (0212) 513 54 00 www.tarihvakfi.org.tr - [email protected] © Tarih Vakfı Yayınları, 2019 WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY PROJECT Project Coordinators İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Editors İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Authors Süreyya Algül, Aslı Aydemir, Gökhan Demir, Ali Yalçın Göymen, Erhan Keleşoğlu, Canan Özbey, Baran Alp Uncu Translation Bilge Güler Proofreading in English Mark David Wyers Book Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Cover Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Printing Yıkılmazlar Basın Yayın Prom. ve Kağıt San. Tic. Ltd. Şti. Evren Mahallesi, Gülbahar Cd. 62/C, 34212 Bağcılar/İstanbull Tel: (0212) 630 64 73 Registered Publisher: 12102 Registered Printer: 11965 First Edition: İstanbul, 2019 ISBN Who’s Who in Politics in Turkey Project has been carried out with the coordination by the History Foundation and the contribution of Heinrich Böll Foundation Turkey Representation. WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY —EDITORS İSMET AKÇA - BARIŞ ALP ÖZDEN AUTHORS SÜREYYA ALGÜL - ASLI AYDEMİR - GÖKHAN DEMİR ALİ YALÇIN GÖYMEN - ERHAN KELEŞOĞLU CANAN ÖZBEY - BARAN ALP UNCU TARİH VAKFI YAYINLARI Table of Contents i Foreword 1 Abdi İpekçi 3 Abdülkadir Aksu 6 Abdullah Çatlı 8 Abdullah Gül 11 Abdullah Öcalan 14 Abdüllatif Şener 16 Adnan Menderes 19 Ahmet Altan 21 Ahmet Davutoğlu 24 Ahmet Necdet Sezer 26 Ahmet Şık 28 Ahmet Taner Kışlalı 30 Ahmet Türk 32 Akın Birdal 34 Alaattin Çakıcı 36 Ali Babacan 38 Alparslan Türkeş 41 Arzu Çerkezoğlu
    [Show full text]
  • Final 06/11/2002
    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FOURTH SECTION CASE OF SADAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (No. 2) (Applications nos. 25144/94, 26149/95 to 26154/95, 27100/95 and 27101/95) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 11 June 2002 FINAL 06/11/2002 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. SADAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (No. 2) JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Sadak and Others v. Turkey (no. 2), The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Sir Nicolas BRATZA, President, Mr M. PELLONPÄÄ, Mr A. PASTOR RIDRUEJO, Mr J. MAKARCZYK, Mr R. TÜRMEN, Mrs V. STRÁŽNICKÁ, Mr S. PAVLOVSCHI, judges, and Mr M. O'BOYLE, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 21 May 2002, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in nine applications (nos. 25144/94, 26149/95 to 26154/95, 27100/95 and 27101/95) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by thirteen Turkish nationals, Mr Selim Sadak, Mr Sedat Yurttaş, Mr Mehmet Hatip Dicle, Mr Sırrı Sakık, Mr Orhan Doğan, Mrs Leyla Zana, Mr Ahmet Türk, Mr Nizamettin Toguç, Mr Naif Güneş, Mr Mahmut Kılınç, Mr Zübeyir Aydar, Mr Ali Yiğit, and Mr Remzi Kartal (“the applicants”), on 23 August 1994 (no. 25144/94) and 16 December 1994 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Evacuations and Destruction of Villages in Dersim (Tunceli), and Western Bingöl, Turkish Kurdistan September-November 1994
    FORCED EVACUATIONS AND DESTRUCTION OF VILLAGES IN DERSIM (TUNCELI), AND WESTERN BINGÖL, TURKISH KURDISTAN SEPTEMBER-NOVEMBER 1994 INTRODUCTION This report details the wave of village evacuations and demolitions, as well as the forest fires that swept across the Dersim region in Turkey, i.e., the province of Tunceli and neighbouring districts, during the autumn of 1994.1 Over a period of two months, around a third of the villages in that province (but in some subdistricts as many as 80 to 100 percent) were evacuated under severe military pressure, and many of them were destroyed and burned down by the army. Thousands of families lost their houses. Moreover large stretches of forest, that only recently had been designated as a nature reserve, were deliberately burnt down. The rationale for all this destruction was the presence of guerrillas of the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party), believed to be hiding out in the forests of this province. The inhabitants of the destroyed villages were suspected of giving food and shelter to these guerrillas. Tunceli was not the first province to fall victim to large-scale village evacuations orchestrated by Turkish security forces. The first instances of forced village evacuations in recent years took place in the 1980s, and since 1992 evacuations followed by demolition have been standard practice in sensitive zones of Turkey's Kurdish-inhabited provinces. The Human Rights Associations of Turkey have repeatedly published lists of villages that had been evacuated and destroyed, adding up to well over 2000 names of villages and hamlets. The present report concentrates on the events in Tunceli.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Resolution: an Assessment of Possibilities, Opportunities and Problems
    TURKEY PEACE ASSEMBLY TOWARDS A RESOLUTION: AN ASSESSMENT OF POSSIBILITIES, OPPORTUNITIES AND PROBLEMS Assoc. Dr. Ayşe Betül Çelik Sabancı University, Department Member Murat Çelikkan Journalist-Centre for Truth Justice Memory Assoc.Prof. Evren Balta Yıldız Technical University, Department Member Assist.Prof. Nil Mutluer Nişantaşı University, Department Member Assoc. Prof. Levent Korkut Medipol University, Department Member Turkey Peace Assembly NOVEMBER 2015 [email protected] | [email protected] +90 (212) 249 2654 www.turkiyebarismeclisi.com /Baris_Meclisi 1 TOWARDS A RESOLUTION AN ASSESSMENT OF POSSIBILITIES, OPPORTUNITIES AND PROBLEMS This report covers the resolution/peace process that took place between the years of 2013 and 2015 in Turkey. It was the first time that the Turkish army and the PKK experienced bilateral ceasefire. This work aimed to contribute to the peace process in the transformation of the ceasefire into a negotiation process. After this report had been written, in President Erdoğan’s words the peace process has been put into deep freeze. And now, peace process had changed into a violent process in Turkey. There have been street clashes, deaths, bombings and all-out massacres. Local mayors and politicians were arrested by the state. More then hundred people were killed in Ankara and Suruç blasts. Diyarbakır Bar President Tahir Elçi was killed while he was making a press statement asking an end to violence. This violent atmosphere under- mined the efforts of democratic powers, NGOs, and peace groups. The report which was written before the start of the violence tried to draw the attention of the actors to the shortcomings and dangers in the peace process.
    [Show full text]
  • Leyla Zana, Prisoner of Conscience
    Leyla Zana European Parliament's Sakharov Prize Winner of 1995 Background Note Leyla Zana has been honoured with many international peace prizes - nominated as well for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1995 and again in 1998 - but she had been unable to accept them in person. When the European Parliament awarded her its Sakharov Prize in 1995 for her courageous defence of human rights and commitment to forging a peaceful, democratic resolution to conflicts between the Turkish government and its minority Kurdish population, she had been jailed for one year of a 15-year sentence. Zana's personal history shows that she developed her political consciousness the hard way. Born in 1961 in the small village of Bache in Eastern Turkey, Leyla Zana married as a 15-year-old with no formal schooling, the former mayor of Diyarbakir, Mehdi Zana. In 1984, Leyla Zana started school, in three years she earned her primary and secondary diplomas, and she took a job with the then newly established Human Rights Association in Diyarbakir. Her husband, Mehdi Zana, was jailed during military rule in the 1980s having been charged with "separatism". After being released in 1992, he was sentenced once more in 1994 to four years' imprisonment, notably because he had voiced his opinion on the situation of Turkish citizens of Kurdish origin before the European Parliament's Subcommittee on Human Rights in December 1992. Leyla became involved in the plight of women whose husbands were imprisoned by the military regime. In the course of defending the rights of her imprisoned husband and other detainees, Zana herself fell victim to official brutality.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Years of Struggle for Freedom to Publish In
    20 YEARS OF STRUGGLE FOR FREEDOM TO PUBLISH IN TURKEY 1994- 2014 20 YEARS OF STRUGGLE 20 YEARS OF STRUGGLE FOR FREEDOM TO PUBLISH IN TURKEY Freedom of Thought and Expression Awards and Freedom to Publish Reports FOR FREEDOM TO PUBLISH 1994 - 2014 IN TURKEY 1. EDITION İSTANBUL, SEPTEMBER 2014 ISBN 978-975-365-017-5 Freedom of Thought and Expression Awards All rights reserved. @TURKIYE YAYINCILAR VE YAYIN DAGITIMCILARI BIRLIGI DERNEGI and Freedom to Publish Reports Inonu Caddesi Opera Palas Apt. No: 55 D:2 34437 Gumussuyu, Beyoglu / ISTANBUL 1994 - 2014 T: 0 212 512 56 02 F: 0 212 511 77 94 E: [email protected] TRANSLATION Ali Ottoman, Funda Soysal, Deniz İnal EDITING Yonca Cingöz PROOF READING Sara Whyatt GRAPHIC DESIGN Elif Rifat TYPESETTING Nevruz Kıran Öksüz PRINTED AND BOUND IN Umut Matbaası 3 CONTENTS Foreword.........................................................................................................................................5 FOREWORD Freedom to Publish Report 1994.....................................................................................................8 Every year since 1995, the Turkish Publishers Association prepares Freedom Freedom of Thought and Expression Awards 1995........................................................................16 to Publish Report and hands out an award to a writer, a publisher and a booksell- er. This year the writer’s award goes to Tonguç Ok, an exceptionally productive Freedom of Thought and Expression Awards 1996........................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Iraqi Kurdistan and the PKK
    Deconstructing Ethnic Conflict and Sovereignty in Explanatory International Relations: The Case of Iraqi Kurdistan and the PKK Submitted by Johannes Černy to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy in Ethno-Political Studies in September 2014 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: _____Johannes Cerny_____________________ 1 2 Abstract: This study is essentially a critique of how the three dominant paradigms of explanatory international relations theory – (neo-)realism, liberalism, and systemic constructivism – conceive of, analytically deal with, and explain ethnic conflict and sovereignty. By deconstructing their approaches to ethnic identity formation in general and ethnic conflict in particular it argues that all three paradigms, in their epistemologies, ontologies and methodologies through reification and by analytically equating ethnic groups with states, tend to essentialise and substantialise the ethnic lines of division and strategic essentialisms of ethnic and ethno-nationalist elites they set out to describe, and, all too often, even write them into existence. Particular attention, both at the theoretical and empirical level, will be given to the three explanatory frameworks explanatory IR has contributed to the study of ethnic conflict: the ‘ethnic security dilemma’, the ‘ethnic alliance model’, and, drawing on other disciplines, instrumentalist approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Turkey-Pkk Conflict
    WHY DO PEACE PROCESSES FAIL: THE CASE OF TURKEY-PKK CONFLICT A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES OF İSTANBUL ŞEHİR UNIVERSITY BY HACER SOLAK IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AUGUST 2019 ABSTRACT WHY DO PEACE PROCESSES FAIL: THE CASE OF TURKEY Solak, Hacer MA in Political Science and International Relations Thesis Advisor: Assist. Prof. Hüseyin Alptekin July 2019, 101 Pages The conflict between Turkey and the Kurdistan Worker’s Party(PKK) has been the long-running problem in the Turkish history. Turkey experienced a Resolution Process at the end of 2012 in order to end this bloody conflict but it came to the end soon, and a new round in the conflict began in 2015. This thesis aims to explain failure of the peace process in Turkey with the actor-oriented perspective and discusses how spoilers pose threat to peace processes in the case of Turkey. First, I make an analysis of Spoiler Theory in the Peace literature by referring the questions that ask what are the factors that motivate spoilers to destroy peace? What are the tactics used by spoilers to destroy peace processes? Second, I focus on the Turkish case between 2012 and 2015, with the aim of examining how spoilers play a key role in the collapse of peace process in Turkey. I support my arguments with a content analysis of the PKK leaders’ discourse used during the peace talks in Turkey. Finally, I offer inferences in terms of if the concept of spoiler can be applied to the Turkey-PKK case in addition to recommendations for peace processes involving spoiler threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Issn: 2278-6236 Twenty-First Century Progress
    International Journal of Advanced Research in ISSN: 2278-6236 Management and Social Sciences Impact Factor: 4.400 TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY PROGRESS – THE NATIONALISTIC MOVEMENTS OF THE KURDS TOWARDS INDEPENDENCE Mahnaz Deihim* Abstract: Ethno-nationalism is nationalism connected to ethnicity. Nationalism can be based on geographical boundaries, or a community. An ethno-nationalism is based on connecting a community to their common origins as one ethnic group, and includes a common language, race, faith and cultural inheritance. Ethnicity combines tribe, occupation, ideology, class and region. An inclination towards tribal supremacy is a classic feature of ethno-nationalism. Twenty-first century nationalisms and ethno-nationalisms are present in many continents. One political movement in the Middle East is Kurdish nationalism, a nation deserving of a sovereign homeland and the largest ethnic stateless group. This could be why though many Kurdish national parties’ agenda is bringing forth a land of Kurds - Kurdistan - tribal thinking, and internal squabbles are limiting factors. This article explores political aspects of Kurds for autonomy in the twenty-first century. *Research Scholar, DOS in Political Science University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore Vol. 3 | No. 7 | July 2014 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 248 International Journal of Advanced Research in ISSN: 2278-6236 Management and Social Sciences Impact Factor: 4.400 INTRODUCTION The name ‘Kurd’ dates back to the seventh century AD and ‘Kurdistan’, means ‘land of the Kurds’. Kurd territory is located in the geographic heart of the Middle East, and, covers parts of Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Syria, and Azerbaijan. Kurd territory has been at the cusp of regional political and economic interests.
    [Show full text]