DOCSLIB.ORG

LA-IFP-001, Revision A, "International Isotopes, Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LA-IFP-001, Revision A, International Isotopes Fluorine Products, Inc. (IIFP) A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of International Isotopes, Inc. Fluorine Extraction Process & Depleted Uranium De-conversion (FEP/DUP) Plant License Application Revision A December 23, 2009 LA-IFP-001 Revision A TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 General Information ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Facility and Process Description ............................................................................................ 1-2 1.1.1 Facility Location, Site Layout and Surrounding Characteristics ............................... 1-4 1.1.2 Facility Description ................................................................................................... 1-6 1.1.2.1 Process Buildings and Process Areas .................................................... 1-8 1.1.2.2 Other Major Buildings ......................................................................... 1-10 1.1.3 Process Description ................................................................................................. 1-12 1.1.3.1 Process Chemistry ............................................................................... 1-12 1.1.3.2 De-conversion of DUF6 to DUF4 Process ............................................ 1-12 1.1.3.3 SiF4 Production Process ....................................................................... 1-14 1.1.3.4 BF3 Production Process ....................................................................... 1-16 1.1.3.5 Process Off-gas Emissions Treatment (Plant KOH Scrubbing System) .. 1- 18 1.1.3.6 Environmental Protection Process (EPP) ............................................ 1-20 1.1.3.7 AHF Staging Containment Building and Fluoride Products Trailer Loading Building ..................................................................................................... 1-22 1.1.4 Utilities Requirements ............................................................................................. 1-23 1.1.4.1 Electrical .............................................................................................. 1-24 1.1.4.2 Steam ................................................................................................... 1-24 1.1.4.3 Compressed Air ................................................................................... 1-24 1.1.4.4 Nitrogen ............................................................................................... 1-24 1.1.4.5 Water Supply ....................................................................................... 1-25 1.1.4.6 Heat, Ventilation and Air Conditioning ............................................... 1-25 1.1.4.7 Ground-Thermal System...................................................................... 1-25 1.1.4.8 Solar Power Supplement ...................................................................... 1-25 1.1.5 Supporting Infrastructure ........................................................................................ 1-25 1.1.5.1 Equipment Support Pads and Spill Containment ................................. 1-26 1.1.5.2 Water Treatment .................................................................................. 1-26 1.1.5.3 Sewer Systems and Collection Basins ................................................. 1-27 1.1.5.4 Fire Protection ..................................................................................... 1-28 1.1.6 Waste Management ................................................................................................. 1-28 1.1.6.1 Solid Wastes ........................................................................................ 1-28 1.1.6.2 Liquid Wastes ...................................................................................... 1-29 1.1.6.3 Liquid and Air Effluents ...................................................................... 1-29 1.1.7 Raw Materials, By-Products, Wastes, and Finished Products ................................. 1-31 1.2 Institutional Information ....................................................................................................... 1-31 LA-IFP-001 Revision A - FEP/DUP Plant License Application December 23, 2009 Page ii 1.2.1 Corporate Identity ................................................................................................... 1-31 1.2.1.1 Applicant Name and Address .............................................................. 1-31 1.2.1.2 Organization and Management of Applicant ....................................... 1-31 1.2.1.3 Address of Facility and Site Location Description .............................. 1-32 1.2.2 Financial Qualifications .......................................................................................... 1-32 1.3 Type, Quantity, and Form of Licensed Material .................................................................. 1-32 1.4 Requested Licenses and Authorized Uses ............................................................................ 1-33 1.5 Security of Classified Information ....................................................................................... 1-33 1.6 Site Description .................................................................................................................... 1-33 1.6.1 Site Geography ........................................................................................................ 1-33 1.6.1.1 Site Location Specifics ........................................................................ 1-33 1.6.1.2 Features of Potential Impact to Accident Analysis .............................. 1-34 1.6.2 Demographics .......................................................................................................... 1-34 1.6.2.1 Latest Census Results .......................................................................... 1-34 1.6.2.2 Description, Distance, and Direction to Nearby Population Area ....... 1-35 1.6.2.3 Proximity to Public Facilities .............................................................. 1-35 1.6.2.4 Near-by Industrial Facilities ................................................................ 1-35 1.6.2.5 Land Use within a Five Mile Radius ................................................... 1-36 1.6.2.6 Land Use within One Mile of the Facility ........................................... 1-36 1.6.2.7 Uses of Nearby Bodies of Water ......................................................... 1-36 1.6.3 Meteorology ............................................................................................................ 1-36 1.6.3.1 Primary Wind Directions and Average Wind Speeds .......................... 1-36 1.6.3.2 Annual Precipitation – Amounts and Forms ........................................ 1-36 1.6.3.3 Severe Weather .................................................................................... 1-39 1.6.3.4 Characteristics of Nearby Rivers, Streams, and Other Bodies of Water . 1- 40 1.6.3.5 Depth to the Groundwater Table ......................................................... 1-41 1.6.3.6 Groundwater Hydrology ...................................................................... 1-41 1.6.3.7 Characteristics of the Uppermost Aquifer ........................................... 1-41 1.6.3.8 Design Basis Flood Events Used for Accident Analysis ..................... 1-42 1.6.4 Geology and Seismology......................................................................................... 1-42 1.6.4.1 Characteristics of Soil Types and Bedrock .......................................... 1-42 1.6.4.2 Earthquake Magnitudes and Return Periods ........................................ 1-42 1.6.4.3 Other Geologic Hazards....................................................................... 1-44 1.7 References ............................................................................................................................ 1-45 2 Organization and Administration ........................................................................................................ 2-1 LA-IFP-001 Revision A - FEP/DUP Plant License Application December 23, 2009 Page iii 2.1 Organizational Structure ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Corporate Background .............................................................................................. 2-2 2.1.2 IIFP Design and Construction Organizational Structure ........................................... 2-2 2.1.3 Transition from Design and Construction to Plant Operations ................................. 2-4 2.1.4 IIFP Operations Organizational Structure ................................................................. 2-5 2.2 Key Management Positions, Responsibilities, and Qualifications ......................................... 2-6 2.2.1 INIS/IIFP President and Chief Executive Officer ..................................................... 2-6 2.2.2 INIS/IIFP Chief Financial Officer ............................................................................. 2-6 2.2.3 INIS/IIFP Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance Director ................................ 2-7 2.2.4 Chief Operations Officer and Commercial Facility Project Director ........................ 2-7 2.2.5 Project Integrated Safety Analysis Lead ................................................................... 2-7 2.2.6 Project Environmental Assessment Lead .................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Extensive Interest in Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies
    Institute for Science and International Security ISIS REPORT March 19, 2012 Department 70 and the Physics Research Center: Extensive Interest in Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies By David Albright, Paul Brannan, Mark Gorwitz, and Andrew Ortendahl On February 23, 2012, ISIS released the report, The Physics Research Center and Iran’s Parallel Military Nuclear Program, in which ISIS evaluated a set of 1,600 telexes outlining a set of departments or buying centers of the former Physics Research Center (PHRC). These departments appeared to be purchasing a variety of goods for specific nuclear technologies, including gas centrifuges, uranium conversion, uranium exploration and perhaps mining, and heavy water production. Figure 1 is a list of the purposes of these departments. The telexes are evaluated in more depth in the February 23, 2012 ISIS report and support that, contrary to Iran’s statements to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the PHRC ran a parallel military nuclear program in the 1990s. In the telexes, ISIS identified a department called Department 70 that is linked to the PHRC. This department tried to procure or obtained technical publications and reports from a document center, relevant know-how from suppliers, catalogues from suppliers about particular goods, and a mini- computer from the Digital Equipment Corporation. Department 70 appears to have had personnel highly knowledgeable about the existing literature on a variety of fuel cycle technologies, particularly gas centrifuges. Orders to a British document center reveal many technical publications about gas centrifuges, atomic laser isotope enrichment, the production of uranium compounds including uranium tetrafluoride and uranium hexafluoride (and precursors such as hydrofluoric acid), nuclear grade graphite, and the production of heavy water.
    [Show full text]
  • Depleted Uranium Technical Brief
    Disclaimer - For assistance accessing this document or additional information,please contact [email protected]. Depleted Uranium Technical Brief United States Office of Air and Radiation EPA-402-R-06-011 Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 December 2006 Depleted Uranium Technical Brief EPA 402-R-06-011 December 2006 Project Officer Brian Littleton U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Radiation and Indoor Air Radiation Protection Division ii iii FOREWARD The Depleted Uranium Technical Brief is designed to convey available information and knowledge about depleted uranium to EPA Remedial Project Managers, On-Scene Coordinators, contractors, and other Agency managers involved with the remediation of sites contaminated with this material. It addresses relative questions regarding the chemical and radiological health concerns involved with depleted uranium in the environment. This technical brief was developed to address the common misconception that depleted uranium represents only a radiological health hazard. It provides accepted data and references to additional sources for both the radiological and chemical characteristics, health risk as well as references for both the monitoring and measurement and applicable treatment techniques for depleted uranium. Please Note: This document has been changed from the original publication dated December 2006. This version corrects references in Appendix 1 that improperly identified the content of Appendix 3 and Appendix 4. The document also clarifies the content of Appendix 4. iv Acknowledgments This technical bulletin is based, in part, on an engineering bulletin that was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA), with the assistance of Trinity Engineering Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Calculations for Depleted Uranium Disposed of As
    ANL/EAD/TM-111 Groundwater Calculations for Depleted Uranium Disposed of as Uranium Tetrafluoride (UF4) Environmental Assessment Division Argonne National Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago, under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38, for the United States Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory, with facilities in the states of Illinois and Idaho, is owned by the United States Government and operated by The University of Chicago under the provisions of a contract with the Department of Energy. This technical memorandum is a product of Argonne’s Environmental Assessment Division (EAD). For information on the division's scientific and engineering activities, contact: Director, Environmental Assessment Division Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Illinois 60439-4832 Telephone (630) 252-3107 Presented in this technical memorandum are preliminary results of ongoing work or work that is more limited in scope and depth than that described in formal reports issued by the EAD. Publishing support services were provided by Argonne’s Information and Publishing Division (for more information, see IPD’s home page: http://www.ipd.anl.gov/). Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The University of Chicago, nor any of their employees or officers, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Fuel Cycle
    Quality and Standards for your converted material Hex Business at Springfields • Westinghouse will deliver on its promise of providing quality assurance for your company. • We pride ourselves on our engineering expertise and technical ability working to international standards including ISO 9001, 14001 and 18001. • Springfields has a long and successful history in the fuel cycle with over 40 years expertise in Hex conversion. Natural Mining Enrichment Fuel Fabrication Milling Nuclear Conversion Fuel Cycle Power Plant Reprocessing Electricity High Level Waste Storage Spent Fuel Storage www.westinghousenuclear.com Hex Business Rotary Kiln Plant Hex Plant Modern nuclear reactor designs such as Pressurised Water and Light Water Reactors To Atmosphere Uranium Trioxide UO – UF Conversion UF – UF Conversion UO 3 4 4 6 need nuclear fuel, made from Uranium Dioxide. 3 UO3 is transported to Kiln Plant in drums where it Uranium Hexafluoride is produced by the reaction UO To Atmosphere 3 is transferred onto a conveyor system. From here of UF with elemental gaseous fluorine in a Uranium Hexafluoride (UF6 ) is an essential intermediate product used in the Feed Hopper 4 Run Off Discharge the drums are delivered into the process via a fluidised bed reactor at 475°C. The fluorine manufacture of Uranium Dioxide fuels. Water UF6 mechanised tipping system. is produced by the electrolysis of anhydrous Condensers Hydration is the first stage in the treatment of hydrofluoric acid (AHF) in a potassium bi-fluoride Vac Back Air UO for the production of UF . electrolyte. 3 4 Secondary Meeting World Demands Advanced Technology Water Glycol Hydrator Heating & Cooling UO2 Transfer AHF Primary The Springfields Hex facilities are capable of Both plants demonstrate proven and state- To Scrubbers Hopper To Scrubbers H2 Transport Rotary Off-Gas Cylinder producing up to 5,500 tU of (UF6) annually, of-the-art technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Effects of Internal Contamination with Uranium Asaf Durakoviæ Department of Nuclear Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington D.C., USA
    COMMENT THIS ARTICLE SEE COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE CONTACT AUTHOR March 1999 (Volume 40, Number 1) Medical Effects of Internal Contamination with Uranium Asaf Durakoviæ Department of Nuclear Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington D.C., USA The purpose of this work is to present an outline of the metabolic pathways of uranium isotopes and compounds, medical consequences of uranium poisoning, and an evaluation of the therapeutic alternatives in uranium internal contamination. The chemical toxicity of uranium has been recognized for more than two centuries. Animal experiments and human studies are conclusive about metabolic adverse affects and nephro- toxicity of uranium compounds. Radiation toxicity of uranium isotopes has been recognized since the beginning of the nuclear era, with well documented evidence of reproductive and developmental toxicity, as well as mutagenic and carcinogenic consequences of uranium internal contamination. Natural uranium (238U), an alpha emitter with a half-life of 4.5x109 years, is one of the primordial substances of the universe. It is found in the earth's crust, combined with 235U and 234U, alpha, beta, and gamma emitters with respective half-lives of 7.1x108 and 2.5x105 years. A special emphasis of this paper concerns depleted uranium. The legacy of radioactive waste, environmental and health hazards in the nuclear industry, and, more recently, the military use of depleted uranium in the tactical battlefield necessitates further insight into the toxicology of depleted uranium. The present controversy over the radiological and chemical toxicity of depleted uranium used in the Gulf War warrants further experimental and clinical investigations of its effects on the biosphere and human organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • 122-- 2A-74---- Artz 3,012,849 United States Patent Office Patented Dec
    Dec. 12, 1961 F. L. HORN 3,012,849 DISSOLUTION OF ZIRCONIUM-CONTAINING FUEL ELEMENTS Filed April 6, 1959 ZRCONIUM CLAD - URANUM, CORED SPENT FUEL ELEMENT (ACD FLUORDE) HF HYDROGEN, VOLATILE DSSOLUTION FSSON PRODUCTS (COMPLEXING AGENT) NO2 AND DECAY PRODUCTS LIQUID PHASE: URANUM DISSOLVED IN HF-NO2. SOLVENT SOLID PHASE: ZRCONUM HF AND NO FLUORIDE COMPLEX RECYCLE F LTRATON SOLDS (ZIRCONUM PLUS FSSION PRODUCTS) EVAPORATION (FLUORINATING AGENT) J BrF FLUORNATION RECYCLED BrF. UFe, EXCESS BrF, VOLATLE FISSIO PRODUCT FLUOR DES SOLIDS (ZIRCONIUM PLUS FSSION PRODUCTS) DST LLATION VOLATLE FSSION PRODUCTS UFs INVENTOR. FREDER!CK L. HORN BY 122-- 2a-74---- artz 3,012,849 United States Patent Office Patented Dec. 12, 1961 2 novel and simple process for the recovery of uranium 3,012,849 from spent fuel elements in which the uranium is mixed DSSOLUTION OF ZIRCONUM-CONTANN FUEL ELEMENTS with, clad with or alloyed with zirconium metal or its Frederick L. Horn, Sayville, N.Y., assignor to the United alloys. A further object of this invention is to provide a States of America as represented by the United States process which effects dissolution of spent fuel elements Atomic Energy Commission of the type described at relatively low temperatures and Filed Apr. 6, 1959, Ser. No. 804,553 pressures and under relatively controllable conditions. 7 Claims. (CI. 23-14.5) Another object of this invention is to provide a process which can use inexpensive, readily available materials r The present invention relates to a method of separat 10. for the construction of process vessels. A still further ing and recovering uranium from spent nuclear reactor object of this invention is to provide a process for re fuel elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Actinide Separation Chemistry in Nuclear Waste Streams and Materials, December 1997
    NEA/NSC/DOC(97)19 NEA NUCLEAR SCIENCE COMMITTEE ACTINIDE SEPARATION CHEMISTRY IN NUCLEAR WASTE STREAMS AND MATERIALS December 1997 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT FOREWORD The separation of actinide elements from various waste materials is a significant problem facing developed countries. The issue arises primarily because of the potential long-term hazard of many of the actinides, but is also due to the regulatory requirements associated with actinide waste disposal, which are different from those associated with other radioactive wastes. The different regulations are in turn related to the different health hazards and generally longer half lives of the actinides. This issue is of continuing interest to the OECD/NEA Member countries primarily in relation to waste produced within power station fuel recycle. Similar problems exist for waste produced in the past as a result of nuclear weapons production programmes and wastes likely to be produced in the future emerging from operations required for waste disposal. The Nuclear Science Committee, representing the interests of the basic R&D in the OECD/NEA Member countries, has established a task force of experts in actinide chemistry to review the current and developing separation techniques and chemical processes of interest in separating actinides. This task force was commissioned with the preparation of a report on the subject. The task force members are listed in Annex 1. This report is intended to provide a timely and representative guide to technical journals and other sources of separation chemistry information on the actinide elements. An important objective is to provide information that may be used to conserve energy and protect humans and the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Design Study of a Continuous Fluorination-Vacuum-Distillation System for Regenerating Fuel and Fertile Streams in a Molten-Salt Breeder Reactor
    Preliminary Design Study of a Continuous Fluorination-Vacuum-Distillation System for Regenerating Fuel and Fertile Streams in a Molten-Salt Breeder Reactor C.D. Scott, W.L. Carter January 1966 Abstract The purpose of this study was to make a preliminary design and an engineering evaluation of a conceptual plant for treating the fuel and fertile streams of a molten-salt breeder reactor. 233 The primary requirements of the process are to recover the unburned fuel ( UF4) and fuel- 233 stream carrier salts (LiF-BeF2) from the fuel stream, and the LiF-ThF4 plus the bred U from the fertile stream. Both streams must be sufficiently decontaminated for attractive breeding performance of the reactor. The plant was designed to operate continuously as an integral part of the reactor system, fitting into two relatively small cells adjacent to the reactor cell. In this study, the plant capacity is based upon treating 15 ft3/day of fuel salt and 105 ft3/day of fertile salt removed as side streams. These capacities are adequate for a 1000-MWe power reactor. As to the fuel stream, basically it is purified by fluorination and vacuum distillation. The first step removes uranium as volatile UF6; the second recovers the LiF-BeF2 by simultaneously volatilizing these two components from the less volatile fission products. Fortunately, the fission products so separated are primarily the rare earths, which are the most serious neutron poisons. The UF6 from the fluorinator is accompanied by some volatile fission product fluorides, primarily those of Mo, Te, Ru, Zr, and Nb, which are removed by sorption on granular NaF and MgF2.
    [Show full text]
  • NUMBER 1 of 2 Actinide Research Quarterly
    NUMBER 1 OF 2 Actinide Research Quarterly Foreword “Plutonium Futures—The Science 2018” was the tenth in a series of inter- national conferences focused on the scientific research and technological uses of plutonium and other actinides. The global actinide research and technology community takes great pride in this series as its origins lie in the United Nations “Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy” conference series initiated in 1958. Co-organized by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), and the American Nuclear Society, and supported by the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Plutonium Futures—The Science 2018 was held at the Wyndham San Diego Bayside, September 9–14, 2018. A total of 218 attendees from around the world participated in talks and discussions—many of these topics presented at Plutonium Futures resonate with those found in the early days of international cooperation. This conference facilitates dialogue among scientists and engineers of diverse scientific disciplines on the science of plutonium and its technological, environmental, health, and socio- economic consequences. This issue of the LANL Actinide Research Quarterly is the first of two issues celebrating the breadth of topics presented at last year’s conference, including: environmental chemistry, metallurgy and materials science, surface science and corrosion, coordination chemistry, nuclear fuel-cycle, detection and speciation analysis, and condensed matter physics. The articles here represent many of the stimulating pieces of research conducted by the global actinide research and technology community. In the tradition of the Plutonium Futures conferences, we recognize here the best student posters (p25).
    [Show full text]
  • Fluoride Salt Coolant Properties for Nuclear Reactor Applications: a Review
    Fluoride salt coolant properties for nuclear reactor applications: A review The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Romatoski, R. R. and L.W. HU. "Fluoride salt coolant properties for nuclear reactor applications: A review." Annals of Nuclear Energy 109 (November 2017): 635-647 As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.05.036 Publisher Elsevier BV Version Author's final manuscript Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123988 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Fluoride salt coolant properties for nuclear reactor applications: A review R.R. Romatoskia and L.W. Hua,* a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, NW12-220, 77 MASSACHUSETTS AVE., CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139 * Corresponding author E-mail addresses: [email protected] (R.R. Romatoski), [email protected] (L.W. Hu) ABSTRACT Fluoride salts are crucial to achieving the benefits of Fluoride-salt-cooled High-temperature Reactors (FHRs). Intensive studies and modeling are being performed in different countries aimed at FHR technology development. Better understanding of liquid fluoride salt coolant properties and their uncertainties are needed for design and analysis of nuclear facilities. The main objective of the present study is to perform a literature survey of the experimental data, numerical studies, reports, and other review compilations for the main thermophysical properties of liquid fluoride salts. The review recommends density, heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and viscosity properties for potential primary coolants LiF-BeF2 (flibe) and NaF-ZrF4 (nafzirf) and secondary coolant LiF-NaF-KF (flinak).
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Studies of Actinides in Molten Salts
    LA-10340 UC-4 Issued: June 1985 LA—10340 DE85 015368 Experimental Studies of Actinides in Molten Salts James G. Reavis DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility fcr the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents 'hat its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- ence herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom- mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 !IT"ISUnOS OF THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLIMfTW t> EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF ACTINIDES IN MOLTEN SALTS by J. G. Reavis ABSTRACT This review stresses techniques used in studies of molten salts containing multigram amounts of actinides exhibiting intense alpha activity but little or no penetrating gamma radiation. The preponderance of studies have used halides because oxygen- containing actinide compounds (other than oxides) are generally unstable at high temperatures. Topics discussed here include special enclosures, materials problems, preparation and purification of acticide elements and compounds, and measurements of various properties of the molten volts. Property measurements discussed are phase relationships, vapor pressure, density, viscosity, absorption spectra, electromotive force, and conductance.
    [Show full text]
  • Flibe Molten Salt Processing
    Flibe Molten Salt Processing Flibe Energy, Inc., Huntsville, Alabama Randall Scheele, principal investigator Andrew Casella, co-principal investigator Nuclear reactors that use molten salts as a fuel medium, particularly liquid-fluoride fuel salts, can operate without concern about radiation damage to their fuel form. They can also refuel while operating. Only the buildup of fission products limits their operational lifetime, and techniques have been proposed that can address this constraint as well. The most attractive technique for the removal of fission products is called reductive extraction and tends to remove the uranium fuel before the fission products. Therefore it is very desirable to chemically remove uranium from the fuel salt prior to the removal of fission products. Fluorination of soluble uranium tetrafluoride to gaseous uranium hexafluoride has been proposed and demonstrated in the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment. The fluorine gas that was used for fluorination of fluoride salt in the past is very reactive and exceptionally corrosive. We propose using nitrogen trifluoride as a safer, less aggressive, and more tunable fluorination agent to accomplish the same goal. In our proposed work, we would utilize a laboratory at PNNL’s Radiochemical Processing Laboratory to conduct development work on NF3 fluorination of a lithium fluoride, beryllium fluoride (LiF-BeF2) salt mixture that also contains small amounts of UF4. Various experimental stations would be set up and the materials would be procured to undertake this experiment. Advanced sensors and instrumentation that have been developed at PNNL would also be employed for exceptional experimental precision. The project would take two years and would demonstrate NF3 fluorination under a variety of uranium concentrations and salt conditions.
    [Show full text]