DOCSLIB.ORG

Investigation of Depot Neuroleptic Injection Site Reactions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investigation of Depot Neuroleptic Injection Site Reactions ORIGINAL PAPERS Investigation of depot neuroleptic injection site reactions Julie C. Jones, Jennifer C. Day, John R. Taylor and Christophers. Thomas Aims and method A cross-sectional survey was ship between reactions and other related vari performed on 318 patients receiving depot ables such as dose, volume, concentration and medication. The presence or absence of a depot site frequency of injection, age, gender and body reaction was recorded by psychiatric nursing staff on a mass index. All patients prescribed depot standardised form. neuroleptic medication attending the depot clinic Results Seventeen per cent of patients were found to at Withington Hospital in south Manchester and have clinically significant depot site reactions. Such from a defined catchment area of south Liverpool reactions were associated with increased frequency of were included in the study. All patients who injection and increased total volume of depot participated gave informed consent, and the administered in the previous 12 months. The severity of study was approved by the local ethics commit a depot site reaction was unrelated to the tees. The following demographic and clinical concentration of depot preparation administered. details were recorded: age, gender, case note Clinical implications Depot site reactions may be diagnosis, date of first episode, dose and reduced by maximising the interval between frequency of depot and all other current medic injections and using low volume (highly concentrated) ation. Details relating to depot administration preparations of depot neuroleptic medication. were systematically collected on a standard form (available from the author upon request), includ ing the volume of depot administered at the time The use of depot neuroleptics in patients suffer of survey, total volume of depot administered in ing from schizophrenia has been associated with the previous year, total number of injections improved compliance and reduced rates of administered in the previous year and any relapse (Hirsch et al 1973; Gottfries & Green. difficulty with injection. 1974: Glazer & Kane, 1992). However, depot The nurses in Liverpool and Manchester who administration has been associated with a normally administered the depot injections were number of complications at the site of injection asked to participate in the study and were shown including nodules and indurations, muscle how to rate the presence or absence of a depot- granulomas, fibrosis, abscess formation and site reaction on the standardised form. They the accumulation of oil after repeated injections were asked to rate the site of the injection for (Starmark et al. 1980: McCreadie et al, 1979; skin thickening, infection/erythema, nodules/ Belanger-Annable. 1985: Hamann et al, 1990). lumps, bleeding, pain and tenderness experi Such adverse events are distressing to the enced as a result of the injection. All of these patient and may lead to non-compliance. items were rated on a four-point Likert scale Hay (1995) found that 19% of patients receiv from zero (none) to four (severe). Because of ing depots experienced significant problems at the distance between the two centres no the site of injection over a 22-week period. These formal assessment of interrater reliability was reactions were more likely to be associated with conducted. concentrated depot preparations, higher doses, In order to investigate the possible contribu larger volumes, weekly injections, prolonged tion of obesity to depot site complications, body treatment, older age and with the prescription mass and height were noted in Manchester only of haloperidol decanoate or zuclopenthixol (weight and height were not routinely recorded in decanoate. Liverpool) and the body mass index was calcu lated. Depot doses were converted to flupenthixol twice weekly equivalent doses using the equiv alence table in the British National Formulary The study (Number 31, March 1996). Chlorpromazine The present study aimed to determine the equivalents were then calculated using standard prevalence of depot reactions and the relation methods (Davis, 1974: Foster, 1989). Clinically Psychiatric Bulletin (1998), 22. 605-607 605 ORIGINAL PAPERS significant depot reactions were judged as any Relationship between depot site reactions and reaction which scored at least two on the Likert other variables scale. The data were entered into a database and analysed on SPSS for Windows. Clinically significant depot site reactions were associated with greater volumes of depot and greater numbers of injections administered dur ing the previous 12 months (Mantel-Haenszel (for linear association) /2=6.10. d.f.= l, P=0.01 Findings and 7.24, d.f.=l, P<0.01, respectively). There was Subject details a highly significant relationship between total volume of depot administered in the past 12 One hundred and fourteen (36%) patients from months and frequency of injection (Spearman Liverpool and 204 (64%) from south Manchester R=0.56. P<0.001). Ordinary concentrations of took part in the study. Two patients in south depot injection were less likely to be associated Manchester declined to take part. There were with depot site reactions when compared with 196 male and 122 female patients with a mean concentrated and low volume preparations age of 43 years (s.d.= 12. range=18 to 76 years). (Mantel-Haenszel (for linear association) Two hundred and sixty-two (83%) had a case X2=5.36, d.f.= l, P=0.02). However, patients pre note diagnosis of schizophrenia: 24 (7.5%) had scribed highly concentrated depot preparations an affective disorder; 20 (6.3%) had a schizo- were prescribed a significantly higher number of affective disorder; and a further eight (2.5%) had injections (ordinary concentration= 17.1, concen- diagnoses varying from organic psychosis, ob trated=20.8 and highly concentrated=29.7 injec sessive-compulsive disorder and temporal lobe tions per year) than the other two groups (ANOVA epilepsy. The diagnosis was not ascertained for F(2, 304)=22.9, P<0.001) and also received a four patients due to missing case notes. The significantly higher volume of depot preparation mean age at first episode of illness was 28 years in the previous year (ordinary concentration= (s.d.=9.1, range=12 to 68 years). 27.6, concentrated=24.4 and highly concen- trated=43.4 ml per year) than the other groups (ANOVAF(2. 308)=10.2. P<0.001). Prevalence of depot site reactions When the severity (sum of Likert scores) of a Side-effects such as bleeding and pain after depot site reaction was analysed after controlling injection, rated one on the Likert scale, were for the volume of depot received in the past 12 common and thus the following results refer only months, no significant difference was found to depot site reactions which scored at least two, between low and higher concentrations of depot. as this was viewed as a clinically significant As flupenthixol decanoate was the most fre depot site reaction. Table 1 shows the number of quently prescribed depot and was available in patients prescribed each depot who experienced three concentration types (20mg/ml. 100mg/ a clinically significant depot site reaction. ml, 200mg/ml) the analysis was repeated and Haloperidol decanoate was associated with the restricted to flupenthixol decanoate. As with the highest proportion of depot site reactions, but whole group there was a trend for more severe this proportion was not significantly different depot site reactions to occur with increasing from the other four depot preparations. The concentration of preparation (Mantel-Haenszel overall prevalence of clinically significant depot /2=3.2, P=0.07): however, when the volume of site reaction was 17%. depot received in the past 12 months was Clinically significant depot site reactions were controlled, there was no significant difference caused by pain (8.2%). bleeding (6.9%), nodules between the three preparations of flupenthixol (4.4%) and skin thickening (3.5%). Clinically decanoate. significant erythema was not present in any of There was no relationship between depot site the patients investigated. reactions, and the dosage of depot (as measured Table 1. Prevalence of clinically significant depot site reactions Clinically significant decanoate, decanoate, palmitate, decanoate, decanoate, reactionAbsent n(%)160(83) n(%)41 n(%)21 n(%)18(82) n(%)21 (85) (88) (75) Present 34(17) 7(15) 3(12) 4(18) 7(25) TotalFlupenthixol 194(100)Fluphanzine48(100)Pipothiazine24(100)Zuclopenthixol22(100)Haloperidol 28(100) 606 Jones et al ORIGINAL PAPERS by chlorpromazine equivalents), concurrent medi Acknowledgements cation, body mass index, gender or age of subject. Thanks are due to Professor A. Burns for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper and to Comment Mrs Julie Morris for statistical advice. Some care should be exercised in interpreting our results as the numbers of patients receiving depot preparations other than flupenthixol de- References canoate were small and the interrater reliability BELANGER-ANNABLE.M. (1985) Long acting neuroleptics: of the nursing staff who rated the presence or technique for intramuscular injection. Canadian Nurse. absence of a clinically significant depot site 81. 1-3. DAVIS.J. M. (1974) Dose equivalence of the anti-psychotic reaction was not formally assessed. There was drugs. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 11. 66-69. also some uncertainty about whether the sub FOSTER.P. (1989) Neuroleptic equivalence. Pharmaceutical jects from Manchester and Liverpool were repre Journal. 243. 431-432. sentative of patients
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lipid-Based Depots: Manufacturing, Administration and Interactions of Protein Drugs with Lipid Formulations
    Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Chemie und Pharmazie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Lipid-based depots: manufacturing, administration and interactions of protein drugs with lipid formulations Michaela Maria Breitsamer aus Starnberg, Deutschland 2019 II ERKLÄRUNG Diese Dissertation wurde im Sinne von § 7 der Promotionsordnung vom 28. November 2011 von Herrn Prof. Dr. Gerhard Winter betreut. EIDESSTATTLICHE VERSICHERUNG Diese Dissertation wurde eigenständig und ohne unerlaubte Hilfe erarbeitet. Wolfratshausen, den 20.05.2019 ________________________________ (Michaela Breitsamer) Dissertation eingereicht am: 20.05.2019 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Gerhard Winter 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Frieß Mündliche Prüfung am: 25.06.2019 III IV FOR MY FAMILY “The way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing” Walt Disney (1901 – 1966) V VI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The present thesis was prepared between March 2015 and December 2018 at the Department of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics at the Ludwig-Maximilians Universität (LMU) in Munich under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Gerhard Winter. First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Dr. Gerhard Winter for giving me the opportunity to join his research group and to work on this extremely interesting and interdisciplinary project. I really appreciated his scientific input throughout all phases of this work, his elaborate advice and his guidance, which also contributed to my personal development over the last years. Furthermore, I would like to thank him for the outstanding working and team atmosphere, which he created at the chair, for supporting my participation in scientific conferences and for initiating and motivating me to the numerous collaborations which contributed to a successful thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Food and Drugs Regulations
    LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO 22 Chap. 30:01 Food and Drugs SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION FOOD AND DRUGS REGULATIONS ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS REGULATION 1. Citation. 2. Requirements prescribed by regulation. 3. Interpretation. 4. Request to Director. 5. Functions, duties, responsibilities of Inspectors. 6. Certificate of appointment. 7. Taking of photographs. 8. Taking samples and detention pending further examination. 9. Violation of Act or Regulations and relabelling or recondition­ ing of food, drug, cosmetic or device. 10. Issue of certificate. 11. Taking a sample, notification of intention and division of sample. 12. Division an interference and objection to procedure by owner or person. 13. Certificate of Analysis. 14. Definition of terms in Part II. 15. Offence to sell unlabelled food. 16. Labelling of package. 17. Declaration of net contents not required on certain labels. 18. List of ingredients not required on certain labels. 19. Declaration not required. 20. Declaration not required to indicate presence of flavouring. 21. Dried or dehydrated products. 22. Food from vending machine. 23. Non application of regulation 16. 24. Standard for a food. 25. Name of designation given to standard, grade or definition. 26. Adulteration of food. 27. Non-adulteration. 28. Contents of package. 29. Display of information on label. 30. First Schedule. 31. Offence. 32. Definition of terms in Part III. 33. Labelling of drug. 34. Contents of label. 35. Label on bulk package. 36. Drug sold on prescription. 37. Packing cases. LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Food and Drugs Chap. 30:01 23 Food and Drugs Regulations [Subsidiary} REGULATION 38. Name and proportion of drug to be stated on label.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Monograph
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrFLUANXOL® Flupentixol Tablets (as flupentixol dihydrochloride) 0.5 mg, 3 mg, and 5 mg PrFLUANXOL® DEPOT Flupentixol Decanoate Intramuscular Injection 2% and 10% flupentixol decanoate Antipsychotic Agent Lundbeck Canada Inc. Date of Revision: 2600 Alfred-Nobel December 12th, 2017 Suite 400 St-Laurent, QC H4S 0A9 Submission Control No : 209135 Page 1 of 35 Table of Contents PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION .........................................................3 SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION ........................................................................3 INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE ..............................................................................3 CONTRAINDICATIONS ...................................................................................................4 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ..................................................................................4 ADVERSE REACTIONS ..................................................................................................10 DRUG INTERACTIONS ..................................................................................................13 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ..............................................................................15 OVERDOSAGE ................................................................................................................18 ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ............................................................19 STORAGE AND STABILITY ..........................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • FDA Approved Drugs with Broad Anti-Coronaviral Activity Inhibit SARS-Cov-2 in Vitro
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.25.008482; this version posted March 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. FDA approved drugs with broad anti-coronaviral activity inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro Stuart Weston1, Rob Haupt1, James Logue1, Krystal Matthews1 and Matthew B. Frieman*1 1 - Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 685 W. Baltimore St., Room 380, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Key words: SARS-CoV-2, nCoV-2019, COVID-19, drug repurposing, FDA approved drugs, antiviral therapeutics, pandemic, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine AbstraCt SARS-CoV-2 emerged in China at the end of 2019 and has rapidly become a pandemic with over 400,000 recorded COVID-19 cases and greater than 19,000 recorded deaths by March 24th, 2020 (www.WHO.org) (1). There are no FDA approved antivirals or vaccines for any coronavirus, including SARS-CoV-2 (2). Current treatments for COVID-19 are limited to supportive therapies and off-label use of FDA approved drugs (3). Rapid development and human testing of potential antivirals is greatly needed. A potentially quicker way to test compounds with antiviral activity is through drug re-purposing (2, 4). Numerous drugs are already approved for use in humans and subsequently there is a good understanding of their safety profiles and potential side effects, making them easier to test in COVID-19 patients.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Antipsychotic Treatment on Metabolic Function: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    The effects of antipsychotic treatment on metabolic function: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Toby Pillinger, Robert McCutcheon, Luke Vano, Katherine Beck, Guy Hindley, Atheeshaan Arumuham, Yuya Mizuno, Sridhar Natesan, Orestis Efthimiou, Andrea Cipriani, Oliver Howes ****PROTOCOL**** Review questions 1. What is the magnitude of metabolic dysregulation (defined as alterations in fasting glucose, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels) and alterations in body weight and body mass index associated with short-term (‘acute’) antipsychotic treatment in individuals with schizophrenia? 2. Does baseline physiology (e.g. body weight) and demographics (e.g. age) of patients predict magnitude of antipsychotic-associated metabolic dysregulation? 3. Are alterations in metabolic parameters over time associated with alterations in degree of psychopathology? 1 Searches We plan to search EMBASE, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from inception using the following terms: 1 (Acepromazine or Acetophenazine or Amisulpride or Aripiprazole or Asenapine or Benperidol or Blonanserin or Bromperidol or Butaperazine or Carpipramine or Chlorproethazine or Chlorpromazine or Chlorprothixene or Clocapramine or Clopenthixol or Clopentixol or Clothiapine or Clotiapine or Clozapine or Cyamemazine or Cyamepromazine or Dixyrazine or Droperidol or Fluanisone or Flupehenazine or Flupenthixol or Flupentixol or Fluphenazine or Fluspirilen or Fluspirilene or Haloperidol or Iloperidone
    [Show full text]
  • Depot Antipsychotic Injections
    Mental Health Services Good Practice Statement For The Use Of DEPOT & LONG ACTING ANTIPSYCHOTIC INJECTIONS Date of Revision: February 2020 Approved by: Mental Health Prescribing Management Group Review Date: CONSULTATION The document was sent to Community Mental Health teams, Pharmacy and the Psychiatric Advisory Committee for comments prior to completion. KEY DOCUMENTS When reading this policy please consult the NHS Consent Policy when considering any aspect of consent National Institute for Clinical Excellence CG178 (2014), Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: prevention and management NHS Lothian (2011), Depot Antipsychotic Guidance, Maudsley (2015), Prescribing Guidelines in Psychiatry 12th edition. UKPPG (2009) Guidance on the Administration to Adults of Oil based Depot and other Long Acting Intramuscular Antipsychotic Injections Summary of Product Characteristics for: Clopixol (Zuclopethixol Decanoate) Flupenthixol Decanoate Haldol (Haloperidol Decanoate) Risperdal Consta Xeplion (Paliperidone Palmitate) ZypAdhera (Olanzapine Embonate) Abilify Maintena (Aripiprazole) 1 CONTENTS REFERENCES/KEY DOCUMENTS …………………………………………………………… 1 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………………. 3 SCOPE …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 DEFINITIONS ……………………………………………………………………………………... 3 CHOICE OF DRUG AND DOSAGE SELECTION ……………………………………………. 3 SIDE EFFECTS ……………………………………………………………….………………….. 5 PRESCRIBING …………………………………………………………………………………… 5 ADMINISTRATION ………………………………………………………………………………. 7 RECORDING ADMINISTRATION ……………………………………………………………… 7
    [Show full text]
  • North of England Guidance for Long Acting Antipsychotic Injections July 17
    Guidance on the Use of Antipsychotic Long-acting Injections in North of England (TEWV version) This guidance aims to inform and support prescribers within the three mental health service providers in the north of England in the cost-effective use of antipsychotic long-acting injections. Long-acting or “depot” injections are a useful and well-established form of administering antipsychotics in the management of schizophrenia and other psychoses. The introduction of long-acting formulations of second-generation (atypical) antipsychotics has created an additional pressure on drug budgets in mental health services, which may be justified if their use results in reduced hospital admissions, shortened length of stay and improved quality of life compared with the first generation (typical) agents. Advantages of long-acting / depot injections Assured compliance with antipsychotic treatment Increased bioavailability (less first-pass metabolism) Steady plasma levels compared to oral medication Reduction in relapse rate, severity of relapse and rehospitalisation Stable therapeutic effects Better downward titration to minimise side-effects There is some evidence that long-acting injections cause less brain tissue loss and deterioration (CATIE study1) Disadvantages of long-acting / depot injections Treatment cannot be stopped quickly if severe side-effects develop (dystonia, EPSE, NMS) Perception by the patient of “being controlled”, losing control over their treatment, or possibly being punished. Pain at the site of injection, lasting possibly 10 days Tissue necrosis - over time hard plaques may form, which will reduce the ease of administration and the efficacy of the injection as well as causing discomfort. Loss of dignity with the gluteal route Over and above these factors, NICE2 recommend that consideration should be given to offering a depot / long-acting injectable antipsychotic to people with psychosis or schizophrenia who express a preference for such treatment after an acute episode.
    [Show full text]
  • Formulary Update
    PEI Drug Programs Formulary Update Issue 06-04 October, 2006 The following changes and additions to the July 2006 edition of the PEI Drug Programs Formulary will be effective October 16th, 2006 unless otherwise noted within this update. If there are any questions regarding the information presented in this update please call the Drug Program office at 368-4947 or toll free at 1-877-577-3737. 1.0 Changes and Additions To The Formulary & MAC Pricing ALMOTRIPTAN (new addition) EDS Criteria: For the treatment of migraine headaches where other standard therapies, such as analgesics and/or ergotamine products have failed. Eligibility is restricted to persons over the age of 18 and under 65 years of age. Coverage is limited to 6 tablets per 30 day period. Persons requiring more than 6 doses per 30 day period should be considered for migraine prophylaxis therapy if they are not already receiving such therapy. 6.25mg tablet 02248128 AXERT (EDS) JAN FW 12.5mg tablet 02248129 AXERT (EDS) JAN FW DILTIAZEM HYDROCHLORIDE (new addition) 120mg capsule 02231150 TIAZAC BVL FNSW 180mg capsule 02231151 TIAZAC BVL FNSW 240mg capsule 02231152 TIAZAC BVL FNSW 300mg capsule 02231154 TIAZAC BVL FNSW 360mg capsule 02231155 TIAZAC BVL FNSW PEI Drug Programs Formulary Update Issue 06-04 October 2006 Page 1 DILTIAZEM HYDROCHLORIDE (new addition) 120mg extended release tablet 02256738 TIAZAC XC BVL FNSW 180mg extended release tablet 02256746 TIAZAC XC BVL FNSW 240mg extended release tablet 02256754 TIAZAC XC BVL FNSW 300mg extended release tablet 02256762 TIAZAC XC BVL FNSW 360mg extended release tablet 02256770 TIAZAC XC BVL FNSW ETHINYL ESTRADIOL/DROSPIRENONE (new addition) 3.0mg/0.03mg tablets 02261723 YASMIN 21 DAY BEX FW 02261731 YASMIN 28 DAY BEX FW ESPROSARTAN MESYLATE & HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE (new addition) 600mg & 12.5mg tablet 02253631 TEVETEN PLUS SLV FNSW GABAPENTIN (change) There is no longer an EDS restriction on this drug.
    [Show full text]
  • Regencerx Preferred Medication List/Formulary Regencerx Preferred Effective February 1, 2008 ©2008
    RegenceRx Preferred Medication List/Formulary Help to stretch your prescription dollar February1, 2008 ©2008. RegenceRx. All Rights Reserved. ©2008. RegenceRx. Effective February 1,2008 Effective 2 Your Preferred Medication List/Formulary 3 Common Questions and Answers Preferred/Formulary Medications 4-11 • By Category • A to Z Listing 12-17 – Generics 18-22 – Preferred/Formulary Brands Non-Preferred/Non-Formulary Brands 23-27 • Generic and Preferred Brand Alternatives Table of Contents Table Effective February 1, 2008 ©2008. RegenceRx. All Rights Reserved. RegenceRx is dedicated to provide the tools you need to understand your options and be a more informed consumer. This preferred medication list/formulary will help—with the answers you need to access affordable prescription benefits. Determining Cost Newly-introduced How much you pay for a prescription generic medications depends on whether it’s a: When a generic is introduced to the • Generic marketplace, it immediately becomes • Preferred/formulary brand name available at the lowest copay. After a • Non-preferred/non-formulary generic is available, the brand name brand name (brand name medication will only be available at the medication not on the list) non-preferred/non-formulary copay. Your cost is lowest for generic Preferred/formulary medications and highest for non- brand name medications preferred/non-formulary brand name Brand name medications on the medications. You can find specific preferred medication list (PML) coverage and copay information in have been chosen because our your summary of benefits. professional review has shown each Generic medications of them to be high-quality, effective, Generics provide the same and affordable. Preferred/formulary therapeutic benefits of their brand brand name medications are either name counterparts, without the more effective or equally effective—at brand name price.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson's Disease
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Parkinson’s Disease Volume 2015, Article ID 609428, 71 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/609428 Review Article Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson’s Disease Philippe Huot,1,2,3 Susan H. Fox,1,2 and Jonathan M. Brotchie1 1 Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8 2Division of Neurology, Movement Disorder Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399BathurstStreet,Toronto,ON,CanadaM5T2S8 3Department of Pharmacology and Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, UniversitedeMontr´ eal´ and Centre Hospitalier de l’UniversitedeMontr´ eal,´ Montreal,´ QC, Canada Correspondence should be addressed to Jonathan M. Brotchie; [email protected] Received 19 September 2014; Accepted 26 December 2014 Academic Editor: Maral M. Mouradian Copyright © 2015 Philippe Huot et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The motor manifestations of Parkinson’s disease (PD) are secondary to a dopamine deficiency in the striatum. However, the degenerative process in PD is not limited to the dopaminergic system and also affects serotonergic and noradrenergic neurons. Because they can increase monoamine levels throughout the brain, monoamine reuptake inhibitors (MAUIs) represent potential therapeutic agents in PD. However, they are seldom used in clinical practice other than as antidepressants and wake-promoting agents. This review article summarises all of the available literature on use of 50 MAUIs in PD. The compounds are divided according to their relative potency for each of the monoamine transporters.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2003
    20EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.9.2003 Appendix referred to in Chapter 1 of Annex VII (*) List as provided by Cyprus in one language of pharmaceutical products for which a marketing authorisation issued under Cypriot law prior to the date of accession shall remain valid until it is renewed in compliance with the acquis or until 31 December 2005, whichever is the earlier. Mention on this list does not prejudge whether or not the pharmaceutical product in question has a marketing authorisation in compliance with the acquis. The attached lists A and B indicate the pharmaceutical products for human use and the veterinary medicinal products respectively, which are currently in circulation in Cyprus. These products were granted their initial marketing author- isation/licence based on the old, non-harmonised legislation. The marketing authorisations of all pharmaceutical products listed, will be renewed (if requested by the manufacturers and/or importers) during 2004 and 2005 in accordance with the provisions of the new, harmonised legislation and eventually, fully harmonised dossiers will be achieved by 31 December 2005. LIST A: MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE Code No Product 9900231 4-WAY NASAL FAST ACTING SPRAY 1% 9800571 5-FLUOROURACIL ‘EBEWE’ VIALS 50MG/ML, 10ML 9800570 5-FLUOROURACIL ‘EBEWE’ VIALS 50MG/ML, 5ML 9700037 -5-FLUOROURACIL INJECTION 50MG/ML 9800572 5-FLUOROURACIL‘EBEWE’ VIALS 50MG/ML, 20ML 20050619 99F0165 HAIR & NAILCARE CAPSULES 97F0150 ABC SPEKTRUM TABLETS 9800252 ABERNIL TABLETS 50MG 9800252 ABERNIL TABLETS
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Careoregon Advantage Plus Comprehensive Formulary
    2019 CareOregon Advantage Customer Service CALL: 503-416-4279 or toll-free 888-712-3258 Drug List (Formulary) TTY/TDD: 711 HOURS OF OPERATION: every day, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. CareOregon Advantage Plus (HMO-POS SNP) For Oregon counties: Clackamas, Columbia, Jackson, Multnomah, Tillamook and Washington facebook.com/careoregon twitter.com/careoregon careoregonadvantage.org H5859_PH2019_1085_C CMS ACCEPTED COA-18422.05-0820 CareOregon Advantage Plus HMO-POS SNP 2019 Formulary (List of Covered Drugs) PLEASE READ: THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION ABOUT THE DRUGS WE COVER IN THIS PLAN H5859_PH2019_1085_C FORMULARY ID 00019571, VERSION 27 This formulary was updated on December 1, 2019. For more recent information or other questions, please contact CareOregon Advantage Customer Service at 888-712-3258 or, for TTY/TDD users, 711, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., daily, or visit careoregonadvantage.org Note to existing members: This formulary has changed since last year. Please review this document to make sure that it still contains the drugs you take. When this drug list (formulary) refers to “we,” “us”, or “our,” it means Health Plan of CareOregon, Inc. When it refers to “plan” or “our plan,” it means CareOregon Advantage Plus. This document includes a list of the drugs (formulary) for our plan which is current as of December 1, 2019. For an updated formulary, please contact us. Our contact information, along with the date we last updated the formulary, appears on the front and back cover pages. You must generally use network pharmacies to use your prescription drug benefit. Benefits, formulary, pharmacy network, and/or copayments/coinsurance may change on January 1, 2020, and from time to time during the year.
    [Show full text]