Finnish Flies of the Family Therevidae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Finnish Flies of the Family Therevidae © Entomologica Fennica. 3 March 2006 Finnish flies of the family Therevidae Antti Haarto & Kaj Winqvist Haarto, A. & Winqvist, K. 2006: Finnish flies of the family Therevidae. — Ento- mol. Fennica 17: 46–55. An illustrated key for the 17 Finnish species of Therevidae is presented that in- cludes six species recorded from neighbouring areas. Distributions of the Finnish species are discussed and presented in maps; evaluations concerning the threatenedness status of Finnish species are included. Antti Haarto, Zoological Museum, Section of Biodiversity and Environmental Science, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland; E-mail: antti.haarto @turkuamk.fi Kaj Winqvist, Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Fin- land; E-mail: [email protected] Received 31 January 2005, accepted 13 July 2005 1. Introduction book on lower Brachycera (Stubbs & Drake 2001) lacks many Finnish species. The most ac- Flies of the family Therevidae belong to the sub- curate key for determining Finnish Therevidae order Brachycera and are relatively large Diptera. was presented by Lyneborg and Spitzer (1974); Unlike Asilidae, a morphologically and biologi- this key covers the Czech Republic fauna. cally close family, adults of Therevidae are not The purpose of this article is to provide an up- predatory and lack the deep groove between the dated key for the Finnish Therevidae and some eyes characteristic of Asilidae. species found in the neighbouring countries. The In Finland, there has been very little informa- distribution and habitat associations for each spe- tion published on Therevidae. Frey (1911) listed cies are briefly discussed based on the few avail- some of the oldest records for the lower able distributional and ecological data. Aprelimi- Brachyceran flies. In their exchange-score cata- nary understanding of the Finnish Therevidae logue, Frey et al. (1941) recorded 13 species of fauna was obtained during the autumn 2003, the Therevidae as being Finnish but using names that Finnish museum material of Therevidae was are currently invalid. Hackman’s (1980) checklist checked for a Brachycera checklist (Kahanpää & included 20 species of Therevidae. Winqvist 2005). Three species listed by Hack- After the turn of the new millennium, a new man (1980) appeared not to belong to the Finnish wave of dipterological interest has begun in Fin- fauna: both European Cliorismia species had land. As large and conspicuous flies, Therevidae been recorded In Russian Karelia, and Thereva can be considered a suitable group for research, circumscripta (Loew) is a more southern Euro- but there has been a lack of updated taxonomic in- pean species. Now there are 17 species of There- formation. For example, the Therevidae key for vidae known from Finland. the European part of Russia (Zaitsev 1988) leads There remains a lot to be discovered about this to unreliable or inadequate identifications of elusive fly family. New studies are needed to ob- Finnish Therevidae. Furthermore, a recent British tain a more profound understanding of the distri- ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 17 • Finnish Therevidae 47 Fig. 2. The middle Fig. 1. (A) The antennae of Dialineura anilis and (B) Acrosathe femora in anterior view annulata. of Acrosathe annulata male. Fig. 3. The head of (A) Dichoglena nigripennis and (B) Psilocephala imberbis males. Fig. 4. The tip of aedeagus in lat- eral view. (A) Cliorismia ardea and (B) Cliorismia rustica males. butions, ecological associations, and conserva- Female: Frons with a continuous or divided tion status of Therevidae species in Finland. shiny black callus (frontal callus) Thereva 4a Knob of halteres light 5 4b Knob of halteres dark Spiriverpa lunulata 2. Key to the Finnish species 5a Male: Middle femora with usually 2 of Therevidae anteroventral bristles (Fig. 2) Female: Erect hairs on tergites 5–8 black The following key covers all the 17 Finnish Acrosathe annulata Therevidae species and six additional species 5b Male: Middle femora usually without (listed within brackets) that have been found from anteroventral bristles Scandinavia, Russia or Baltic countries. This key Female: Erect hairs on tergites 5–8 white is based on our studies and literature (Lyneborg & [Acrosathe baltica] Spitzer 1974, Stubbs & Drake 2001, Zaitsev 6a Males 7 1988). 6b Females 11 7a Frons broader than anterior ocellus (Fig. 1a First segment of antennae thicker than the 3A). Abdomen silvery pollinose or black pedicel and flagellum (Fig. 1A) with silvery pattern 8 Dialineura anilis 7b Frons narrower than anterior ocellus (Fig. 1b All segments of antennae equally thick (Fig. 3B). Abdomen silvery pollinose 9 1B) 2 8a Halteres black. Abdomen silvery pollinose 2a Face hairy 3 Dichoglena nigripennis 2b Face bare 6 8b Halteres yellow. Abdomen black, tergites 3a Male: Tergites silvery pollinose and the hairs with weak silvery triangles on abdomen silvery white Pandivirilia eximia Female: Frons without callus 4 9a Femora completely black from base to apex 3b Male: Tergites without pollen to fully dusted Psilocephala imberbis with dirty yellow or grey pollen (usually 9b Femora with yellow apex 10 with a dark anterior and lighter posterior re- 10a Tip of aedeagus straight (Fig. 4A) gion), hairs on abdomen mixed dark (black [Cliorismia ardea] to brownish black) and light (yellow to 10b Tip of aedeagus S-shaped (Fig. 4B) white) [Cliorismia rustica] 48 Haarto & Winqvist • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 17 Fig. 6. The hind femora in posterior view of Thereva inornata male. Fig. 5. The tip of aedeagus in lateral view. (A) Thereva cinifera,(B)T. fulva,(C)T. inornata,(D)T. plebeja and (E) T. strigata males. Fig. 8. The hind femora in anterior view of (A) Thereva inornata and (B) T. nobilitata males. Fig. 7. The mesonotum of Thereva. 11a Femora completely black from base to apex 5b The basal part of hind femora without 12 posteroventral bristles 10 11b Femora with yellow apex 6a 2 pairs of dorsocentral bristles (Fig. 6). The [C. ardea and C. rustica] basal part of hind femora with 3–4 12a Tibiae and tarsi as dark as femora. Wing posteroventral bristles (Fig. 7). The antero- membrane with brownish border adjacent to ventral bristles of the hind femora usually wing veins Dichoglena nigripennis uniserial (Fig. 8A). Tip of aedeagus long 12b Tibiae and tarsi yellowish, lighter in contrast curved (Fig. 5C) T. inornata to femora. Wing membrane without brown- 6b 1 pair of dorsocentral bristles. The basal part ish border adjacent to wing veins 13 of hind femora with 1–3 posteroventral bris- 13a Wing membrane yellow basally. Large spe- tles. Hind femora with additional bristles cies (12–18 mm) Pandivirilia eximia outside the normal anteroventral row (as in 13b Wing membrane completely transparent. Fig. 8B) 7 Small species (8–10 mm) 7a Anterior part of tergites 4–5 with narrow Psilocephala imberbis dark band (more than half the lateral part of tergites 4–5 dusted with grey pollen) 8 Genus Thereva 7b Anterior part of tergites 4–5 with broad dark band (only half the lateral part of tergites 4–5 1a Males 2 dusted with grey pollen) 9 1b Females 14 8a Tergite 6 fully dusted with greyish pollen 2a All tergites light anteriorly, tergites com- (dark anterior transverse band absent). Wing pletely dusted with dirty yellow or grey pol- membrane greyish, veins light brown and len 3 crossveins weakly darkened. Hairs on the 2b Anterior region of at least tergites 2–5 dark 4 lower part of the occiput and parafacial 3a Knob of halteres brownish black. Tip of mixed with white and black T. unica aedeagus short (Fig. 5A) T. cinifera 8b Tergite 6 incompletely dusted with greyish 3b Knob of halteres yellowish brown. Tip of pollen (dark anterior transverse band pres- aedeagus long (Fig. 5B) [T. fulva] ent). Wing membrane whitish, veins dark 4a All tergites glossy black [T. atripes] brown and crossveins intensively darkened. 4b At least part of the tergites matt 5 Hairs on the lower part of the occiput and 5a At least one posteroventral bristle in the parafacial white [T. marginula] basal part of the hind femora (Fig. 6) 6 9a Mesonotum greyish brown and usually with ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 17 • Finnish Therevidae 49 a clear dark brown central line. Hairs on ter- row transverse band or divided into two sep- gite 1 completely black or dark brown. Tip of arate calli 15 aedeagus short (Fig. 5D) T. plebeja 14b One wide, usually large, shiny black frontal 9b Mesonotum bluish gray and at most with a callus 16 diffuse dark central line. Hairs on tergite 1 15a Frontal callus a narrow transverse band that grey or yellowish medially. Tip of aedeagus is sometimes divided medially (Fig. 9A). long (Fig. 5E) T. strigata Anteroventral bristles of the hind femora 10a Hairs on scutellum sparse and completely uniserial (as in Fig. 8A) T. valida black. Hairs on abdomen predominantly 15b Frontal callus clearly separated on two parts black. Usually 1 dorsocentral bristle. Front (Fig. 9B). Anteroventral bristles of the hind femora anteroventrally usually without bris- femora nearly uniserial, but irregularly ar- tles T. valida ranged towards base (as in Fig. 8B) 10b Hairs on scutellum mixed yellow and black. T. unica Hairs on abdomen yellow laterally and black 16a All tergites light anteriorly, tergites com- dorsally 11 pletely dusted with dirty yellow or grey pol- 10c Hairs on scutellum and abdomen almost len 17 completely white 12 16b Anterior region of at least tergites 2–5 dark 11a Anteroventral bristles of the hind femora 18 multiserial (some bristles outside the normal 17a Knob of halteres blackish. Tergite 7 dusted anteroventral row) (Fig. 8B). Hairs on with grey pollen. The frontal callus sepa- scutellum not exceptionally dense and rated from the anterior ocellus (Fig. 9C) mixed yellowish and black. Usually 1 T. cinifera dorsocentral bristle. Front femora with 1–4 17b Knob of halteres yellowish.
Recommended publications
  • Pohoria Burda Na Dostupných Historických Mapách Je Aj Cieľom Tohto Príspevku
    OCHRANA PRÍRODY NATURE CONSERVATION 27 / 2016 OCHRANA PRÍRODY NATURE CONSERVATION 27 / 2016 Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky Banská Bystrica Redakčná rada: prof. Dr. Ing. Viliam Pichler doc. RNDr. Ingrid Turisová, PhD. Mgr. Michal Adamec RNDr. Ján Kadlečík Ing. Marta Mútňanová RNDr. Katarína Králiková Recenzenti čísla: RNDr. Michal Ambros, PhD. Mgr. Peter Puchala, PhD. Ing. Jerguš Tesák doc. RNDr. Ingrid Turisová, PhD. Zostavil: RNDr. Katarína Králiková Jayzková korektúra: Mgr. Olga Majerová Grafická úprava: Ing. Viktória Ihringová Vydala: Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky Banská Bystrica v roku 2016 Vydávané v elektronickej verzii Adresa redakcie: ŠOP SR, Tajovského 28B, 974 01 Banská Bystrica tel.: 048/413 66 61, e-mail: [email protected] ISSN: 2453-8183 Uzávierka predkladania príspevkov do nasledujúceho čísla (28): 30.9.2016. 2 \ Ochrana prírody, 27/2016 OCHRANA PRÍRODY INŠTRUKCIE PRE AUTOROV Vedecký časopis je zameraný najmä na publikovanie pôvodných vedeckých a odborných prác, recenzií a krátkych správ z ochrany prírody a krajiny, resp. z ochranárskej biológie, prioritne na Slovensku. Príspevky sú publikované v slovenskom, príp. českom jazyku s anglickým súhrnom, príp. v anglickom jazyku so slovenským (českým) súhrnom. Členenie príspevku 1) názov príspevku 2) neskrátené meno autora, adresa autora (vrátane adresy elektronickej pošty) 3) názov príspevku, abstrakt a kľúčové slová v anglickom jazyku 4) úvod, metodika, výsledky, diskusia, záver, literatúra Ilustrácie (obrázky, tabuľky, náčrty, mapky, mapy, grafy, fotografie) • minimálne rozlíšenie 1200 x 800 pixelov, rozlíšenie 300 dpi (digitálna fotografia má väčšinou 72 dpi) • každá ilustrácia bude uložená v samostatnom súbore (jpg, tif, bmp…) • používajte kilometrovú mierku, nie číselnú • mapy vytvorené v ArcView je nutné vyexportovať do formátov tif, jpg,..
    [Show full text]
  • QQR 7 Information Pack
    7th Quinquennial Review of Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981) Information Pack (version 2.21) 14 May 2021 1 Version 2.2: Four reptiles and two seals removed from the EPS list (Annex 1); one EPS amphibian and two EPS reptiles that are all Endangered removed from Annex 2 – these species were included in Version 2 and/or 2.1 in error. See Annex 1 and Annex 2 for further information. 1. Introduction Every five years, the country nature conservation bodies (Natural England, Natural Resources Wales and NatureScot), working jointly through the UK Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), review Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (WCA) 1981. The review will provide recommendations to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and to Ministers for the Environment in the Scottish Government and Welsh Government for changes to these schedules2. This is known as the Quinquennial Review (QQR). As part of the QQR, stakeholders are provided with the opportunity to propose changes to the species on the schedules. This Information Pack has been produced for the 7th QQR (QQR 7). It is important to note that this QQR differs from previous ones. The Information Pack explains the new selection criteria, provides a timetable, and explains the process to be used by stakeholders. Contact details of the QQR Inter-agency Group who are managing QQR 7, are listed in Section 5. In addition, the Information Pack provides details of how to complete the online survey through which stakeholders propose new species for inclusion on, or removal of existing species from Schedules 5 and 8, or propose a change to how species are protected on the schedules.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta, Diptera): Proposed Conservation of Usage by Designation of Musca Plebeja Linnaeus, 1758 As the Type Species of Thereva
    198 Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 60(3) September 2003 Case 3251 Thereva Latreille, 1797 and Phasia Latreille, 1804 (Insecta, Diptera): proposed conservation of usage by designation of Musca plebeja Linnaeus, 1758 as the type species of Thereva Kevin C. Holston Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) Michael E. Irwin Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) F. Christian Thompson Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, BARC, ARS, USDA, do Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. The purpose of this application, in relation to Article 67.2 of the Code, is to conserve the usage of the name Thereva Latreille, 1797 for a cosmopolitan genus of stiletto flies (family THEREVIDAE) that currently includes 201 species, and also the usage of Phasia Latreille, 1804 and PHASIINAE for a group of tachinid flies (family TACHINIDAE), some of which are economically important as parasites of plant bugs (Heteroptera). It is proposed that Musca plebeja Linnaeus, 1758 should be designated as the type species of the therevid genus Thereva. M. plebeja was not one of the nominal species that were first associated with the name Thereva by Fabricius (1798). Fabricius used Thereva for a group of tachinid flies that are now referred to by the name Phasia Latreille, 1804. Keywords. Nomenclature; taxonomy; Diptera; THEREVIDAE; TACHINIDAE; Thereva; Phasia; Thereva plebeja; stiletto flies; tachinids. 1. Latreille (1797, p. 168) described a genus of stiletto fries (now in the family THEREVIDAE) and named it Thereva.
    [Show full text]
  • 76 ©Kreis Nürnberger Entomologen; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Galathea, Berichte des Kreises Nürnberger Entomologen e.V. Jahr/Year: 1997 Band/Volume: 13 Autor(en)/Author(s): Dunk Klaus von der Artikel/Article: Ecological studies on Pipunculidae (Diptera) 61-76 ©Kreis Nürnberger Entomologen; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at galathea 13/2 Berichte des Kreises Nürnberger Entomologen1997 • S. 61 -76 Ecological studies on Pipunculidae (Diptera) K laus von der D unk Zusammenfassung: Es wird über Freilandbeobachtungen an Augenfliegen berich­ tet. Räumlich begrenzte Vorkommen erwiesen sich als erstaunlich artenreich. Sie werden im einzelnen vorgestellt, sowie eine bemerkenswerte Begleitfauna genannt. Betrachtungen von Verhaltensweisen runden das Bild ab, zeigen aber gleichzeitig die Notwendigkeit für weitere Studien. Abstract: Studies on Pipunculid flies in their natural environment are presented. Certain places are described, which proved to be astonishingly rieh in species. Some remarkable associating insect species are listed. As far as investigated comments on the behaviour of the adult flies are added. Key words: Diptera, Pipunculidae, behaviour, ecology Introduction Pipunculid flies are rather small mostly black insects, developing as parasitoids inside leafhoppers, with the ability of hovering (relationship to Syrphidae) and with enormous compound eyes, useful for males in search for females, and for females in search for a potential victim, a cicad larva. Most specimen of Pipunculidae studied so far were collected by Malaise traps. This material allows to describe the existing species, to secure their systematical stand, and to mark their distribution. Many questions in this chapter are still open. On the other hand the development as parasitoids in leafhoppers show fascinating aspects of adaptations to this life and even has an ecological/economical content regarding pest control.
    [Show full text]
  • JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 11 The Western Approaches: Falmouth Bay to Kenfig edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1996 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group and supported by WWF-UK. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, J.C. Brooksbank, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance C.A. Smith, R. Keddie, J. Plaza, S. Palasiuk, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice came from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group Prof. S.J. Lockwood MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names
    Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus-group names. Part V Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart Evenhuis, Neal L.; Pape, Thomas; Pont, Adrian C. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Evenhuis, N. L., Pape, T., & Pont, A. C. (2016). Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus- group names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart. Magnolia Press. Zootaxa Vol. 4172 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Zootaxa 4172 (1): 001–211 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22128906-32FA-4A80-85D6-10F114E81A7B ZOOTAXA 4172 Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart NEAL L. EVENHUIS1, THOMAS PAPE2 & ADRIAN C. PONT3 1 J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Entomological Research, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-2704, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by D. Whitmore: 15 Aug. 2016; published: 30 Sept. 2016 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 NEAL L.
    [Show full text]
  • Answers to the Comments by Reviewer RC2
    Answers to the comments by reviewer RC2: General comments: 1) My main issue with this manuscript has to do with its readability. There are numerous grammatical errors throughout, some of which are pointed out below. A native English speaker should edit the paper before resubmission. This is now done. The authors are grateful for the thorough review also concerning the language. 2) The authors tend to make some broad sweeping conclusions based on trends that are only significant across a small fraction of the total study region. I would like to see more discussion of the full picture (like Figure 9). Pg 10 L2 and Pg11 L5 are two instances where the discussion is too narrow in focus. The authors have now extended the mentioned discussions (sections 3.1.1, 3.1.3 and 3.3.) as requested. The systematic signal of change is not as dramatic in Finland as in some areas, because of the large variation of winter weather. Especially the sea ice extent of Baltic Sea affects largely the Finnish winter weather. If the Gulf of Finland and Gulf of Bothnia freeze completely the Finnish climate is almost continental in winter even on the coast. We added a comment about the hemispherical study published recently, where we studied the effect of weather parameters on the observed changes in larger areas. Section 3.1.1 main addition: Especially variable melt onset timing is in the coastal regions (Southwestern Finland and Southern Ostrobothnia) and in the Lake district. For those regions the standard deviation values of the melt onset day are 14.3, 14.7 and 14.6, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Icos23 665.Pdf (420.2Kb)
    Antti Leino, Finland 665 Multilingual Names on the Finnish Basic Map Antti Leino Finland Abstract The Finnish Basic Map and the computerised Place Name Register maintained by the National Land Survey for map-making purposes have place names in five different languages: the official Finnish and Swedish, and three semi-official Sámi languages. As one would expect, distributions of the various languages overlap, and roughly one percent of the named places have names in more than one language. All five naming systems are similar enough that semantically transparent toponyms can be translated from one language to another. The three Sámi languages are also similar enough that virtually all common multilingual names are also common in each of their respective languages. This is also true for Finnish and Swedish, but the names common to Finnish and the Sámi languages often involve elements that have a more limited geographic distribution in Finnish. All this gives some insight into the underlying cultural interplay, and also into the role of semantic transparency in name use. *** Introduction The Republic of Finland has two official and five semi-official languages, as shown in Table 1. Of these the Sámi languages, Finnish, and Swedish have the longest history of being spoken in the region, reaching further back than historical records. Pitkänen (2001) outlines how originally Finnish toponyms along the southern coast have been loaned to a new, Swedish-speaking population in the early Middle Ages, and also dates (1990) some of them to as early as the end of the last millennium B.C. Loan words in the Finnic languages also make it clear that contacts with Germanic languages have been constant since prehistoric times, and it has been argued (Itkonen 1983) that contacts with Indo-Europeans, both Baltic and Germanic, were the original cause for the differentiation of Finnic and Sámi languages.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Status of Larger Brachycera Flies of Great Britain
    Natural England Commissioned Report NECR192 A review of the status of Larger Brachycera flies of Great Britain Acroceridae, Asilidae, Athericidae Bombyliidae, Rhagionidae, Scenopinidae, Stratiomyidae, Tabanidae, Therevidae, Xylomyidae. Species Status No.29 First published 30th August 2017 www.gov.uk/natural -england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background Making good decisions to conserve species This report should be cited as: should primarily be based upon an objective process of determining the degree of threat to DRAKE, C.M. 2017. A review of the status of the survival of a species. The recognised Larger Brachycera flies of Great Britain - international approach to undertaking this is by Species Status No.29. Natural England assigning the species to one of the IUCN threat Commissioned Reports, Number192. categories. This report was commissioned to update the threat status of Larger Brachycera flies last undertaken in 1991, using a more modern IUCN methodology for assessing threat. Reviews for other invertebrate groups will follow. Natural England Project Manager - David Heaver, Senior Invertebrate Specialist [email protected] Contractor - C.M Drake Keywords - Larger Brachycera flies, invertebrates, red list, IUCN, status reviews, IUCN threat categories, GB rarity status Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/natural-england. For information on Natural England publications contact the Natural England Enquiry Service on 0300 060 3900 or e-mail [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Insect Fauna of a Deteriorating Riverine Sand Dune
    ., CHANGES IN THE INSECT FAUNA OF A DETERIORATING RIVERINE SAND DUNE COMMUNITY DURING 50 YEARS OF HUMAN EXPLOITATION J. A. Powell Department of Entomological Sciences University of California, Berkeley May , 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORY OF EXPLOITATION 4 HISTORY OF ENTOMOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS 7 INSECT FAUNA 10 Methods 10 ErRs s~lected for compar"ltive "lnBlysis 13 Bio1o~ica1 isl!lnd si~e 14 Inventory of sp~cies 14 Endemism 18 Extinctions 19 Species restricted to one of the two refu~e parcels 25 Possible recently colonized species 27 INSECT ASSOCIATES OF ERYSIMUM AND OENOTHERA 29 Poll i n!ltor<'l 29 Predqt,.n·s 32 SUMMARY 35 RECOm1ENDATIONS FOR RECOVERY ~4NAGEMENT 37 ACKNOWT.. EDGMENTS 42 LITERATURE CITED 44 APPENDICES 1. T'lbles 1-8 49 2. St::ttns of 15 Antioch Insects Listed in Notice of 75 Review by the U.S. Fish "l.nd Wildlife Service INTRODUCTION The sand dune formation east of Antioch, Contra Costa County, California, comprised the largest riverine dune system in California. Biogeographically, this formation was unique because it supported a northern extension of plants and animals of desert, rather than coastal, affinities. Geologists believe that the dunes were relicts of the most recent glaciation of the Sierra Nevada, probably originating 10,000 to 25,000 years ago, with the sand derived from the supratidal floodplain of the combined Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers. The ice age climate in the area is thought to have been cold but arid. Presumably summertime winds sweeping through the Carquinez Strait across the glacial-age floodplains would have picked up the fine-grained sand and redeposited it to the east and southeast, thus creating the dune fields of eastern Contra Costa County.
    [Show full text]
  • Answers to the Comments by Reviewer RC1: This Is an Interesting
    Answers to the comments by reviewer RC1: This is an interesting and thorough study, but some of the methods are hard to follow. In particular, I recommend some effort on simplifying and clarifying the descriptions of sigmoid fits in sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2; figures of example fits might help. The authors are grateful for the encouraging comment. The sigmoid fitting is described now in more detail and related images are included. The method sounds complicated, because one has to take into account also rare, but possible complications (such as marked snowfall after melt onset). However, the main complication really to take into account is the greening up of vegetation. This is demonstrated in the added Figure 2, where we also now include examples of temporary pits before melt onset and temporary peaks after snow melt. Minor comments: page 1, line 26. Forest cover having a significant influence on albedo does not follow from it being an important component of the carbon budget. This sentence is now edited according to the comment. page 2, line 11. “by in” – delete one “in” is deleted as requested. page 2, line 24 “since 200” is sufficient “Year” is removed as suggested. page 3, line 3 I think that standalone forcing of land models with climate model outputs is being dis- cussed here, but it is not clear. The text is edited (page 3, line 6). page 4, line 6 Delete “only” “Only” is deleted as requested. page 5, line 21 “using in-situ FSC observations” Is FSC %-units simply %? Yes, the FSC units is %.
    [Show full text]
  • Create by Pagemanager
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists • CkAdrDTI jIm kit filiated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society NO 39MARCH 1995 ISSN 1358-5029 DIPTERISTS FORUM UPDATE The Dipterists Forum was launched at Dipterists Day on 12 November 1994 at the Natural History Museum, London. We now have a fully fledged society. How the Forum develops from now is up to the membership. The committee members are: Roy Crossley (Chairman), Alan Stubbs (Secretary), Jon Cole (Treasurer, coopted after the AGM), Liz Howe (Membership Secretary), Martin Drake (Bulletin Editor, a change of post title made at the first General Committee meeting), Patrick Roper (Publicity Officer), Stuart Ball, Steve Falk, Roger Morris, Chris Spilling (elected Ordinary Members), Brian Pitkin (co-opted Ordinary Member), Peter Chandler (BENHS Representative), Graham Rotheray (Dipterists Digest Editor). We held the first general committee meeting on 21 January at the BENHS rooms at Dinton Pastures, Reading. Some items we discussed are covered elsewhere in this Bulletin (Dipterists Digest, new GB Check List, changes to the newsletters), and Alan Stubbs covered many other issues in his report of the Interim Committee in the last Bulletin. Other "highlights" of the General Committee meeting were: Bank account There is a healthy balance, sufficient for foreseen commitments. BENHS have kindly agreed since this meeting that their honorary auditors will inspect our accounts when doing their own, for no charge. Constitution. We refined the draft that was circulated with the last Bulletin. A final draft will be circulated in the August Bulletin for approval at the next AGM. BENHS kindly have added the Dipterists Forum to their insurance policy at no cost to us.
    [Show full text]