Infection in Mice: a Model of the Pathogenesis of Severe Orthomyxovirus Infection
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Antiviral Bioactive Compounds of Mushrooms and Their Antiviral Mechanisms: a Review
viruses Review Antiviral Bioactive Compounds of Mushrooms and Their Antiviral Mechanisms: A Review Dong Joo Seo 1 and Changsun Choi 2,* 1 Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Health and Welfare and Education, Gwangju University 277 Hyodeok-ro, Nam-gu, Gwangju 61743, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Food and Nutrition, School of Food Science and Technology, College of Biotechnology and Natural Resources, Chung-Ang University, 4726 Seodongdaero, Daeduck-myun, Anseong-si, Gyeonggi-do 17546, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-670-4589; Fax: +82-31-676-8741 Abstract: Mushrooms are used in their natural form as a food supplement and food additive. In addition, several bioactive compounds beneficial for human health have been derived from mushrooms. Among them, polysaccharides, carbohydrate-binding protein, peptides, proteins, enzymes, polyphenols, triterpenes, triterpenoids, and several other compounds exert antiviral activity against DNA and RNA viruses. Their antiviral targets were mostly virus entry, viral genome replication, viral proteins, and cellular proteins and influenced immune modulation, which was evaluated through pre-, simultaneous-, co-, and post-treatment in vitro and in vivo studies. In particular, they treated and relieved the viral diseases caused by herpes simplex virus, influenza virus, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Some mushroom compounds that act against HIV, influenza A virus, and hepatitis C virus showed antiviral effects comparable to those of antiviral drugs. Therefore, bioactive compounds from mushrooms could be candidates for treating viral infections. Citation: Seo, D.J.; Choi, C. Antiviral Bioactive Compounds of Mushrooms Keywords: mushroom; bioactive compound; virus; infection; antiviral mechanism and Their Antiviral Mechanisms: A Review. -
Detection of Respiratory Viruses and Subtype Identification of Inffuenza a Viruses by Greenechipresp Oligonucleotide Microarray
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Aug. 2007, p. 2359–2364 Vol. 45, No. 8 0095-1137/07/$08.00ϩ0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00737-07 Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Detection of Respiratory Viruses and Subtype Identification of Influenza A Viruses by GreeneChipResp Oligonucleotide Microarrayᰔ† Phenix-Lan Quan,1‡ Gustavo Palacios,1‡ Omar J. Jabado,1 Sean Conlan,1 David L. Hirschberg,2 Francisco Pozo,3 Philippa J. M. Jack,4 Daniel Cisterna,5 Neil Renwick,1 Jeffrey Hui,1 Andrew Drysdale,1 Rachel Amos-Ritchie,4 Elsa Baumeister,5 Vilma Savy,5 Kelly M. Lager,6 Ju¨rgen A. Richt,6 David B. Boyle,4 Adolfo Garcı´a-Sastre,7 Inmaculada Casas,3 Pilar Perez-Bren˜a,3 Thomas Briese,1 and W. Ian Lipkin1* Jerome L. and Dawn Greene Infectious Disease Laboratory, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York1; Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California2; Centro Nacional de Microbiologia, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain3; CSIRO Livestock Industries, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Victoria, Australia4; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas, ANLIS Dr. Carlos G. Malbra´n, Buenos Aires, Argentina5; National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Ames, Iowa6; and Department of Microbiology and Emerging Pathogens Institute, 7 Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York Downloaded from Received 4 April 2007/Returned for modification 15 May 2007/Accepted 21 May 2007 Acute respiratory infections are significant causes of morbidity, mortality, and economic burden worldwide. An accurate, early differential diagnosis may alter individual clinical management as well as facilitate the recognition of outbreaks that have implications for public health. -
Studies on Interspecies and Intraspecies Transmission of Influenza a Viruses
STUDIES ON INTERSPECIES AND INTRASPECIES TRANSMISSION OF INFLUENZA A VIRUSES DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Hadi M. Yassine, M.Sc. ***** The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Professor Y.M. Saif, Adviser Professor D.J. Jackwood Approved by Professor J. Lejeune Assistant Professor C.W. Lee ______________________ Adviser Graduate Program in Veterinary Preventive Medicine i Copyright HAdi M. Yassine 2009 ii ABSTRACT Influenza A viruses are enveloped viruses belonging to the family Orthomyxoviradae that encompasses four more genera: Influenza B, Influenza C, Isavirus and Thogotovirus. Type A is the only genus that is highly infectious to variety of animal species, including human, pigs, wild and domestic birds, horses, cats, dogs, ferrets, seals, whales, and others. Avian viruses are generally thought to preferentially bind the N-acetylneuraminic acid- α2,3-galactose (NeuAcα2,3Gal) form of sialic acid receptors and human viruses preferentially bind to NeuAcα2,6Gal sialic acid receptors. Pigs express substantial amount of both forms of sialic acids on their upper respiratory epithelial cells, and it is believed that both avian and human influenza viruses can attach to the appropriate receptors and infect pigs. Hence, pigs have been postulated to serve as a “mixing vessels” in which two or more influenza viruses can co-infect and undergo reassortment with potential for development of new viruses that can transmit to and infect other species. An H1N1 influenza A virus, A/swine/Ohio/24366/07, was isolated from pigs in an Ohio County fair. -
How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways During Uncoating
cells Review How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways during Uncoating Etori Aguiar Moreira 1 , Yohei Yamauchi 2 and Patrick Matthias 1,3,* 1 Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, 4058 Basel, Switzerland; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Sciences, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Influenza is a zoonotic respiratory disease of major public health interest due to its pan- demic potential, and a threat to animals and the human population. The influenza A virus genome consists of eight single-stranded RNA segments sequestered within a protein capsid and a lipid bilayer envelope. During host cell entry, cellular cues contribute to viral conformational changes that promote critical events such as fusion with late endosomes, capsid uncoating and viral genome release into the cytosol. In this focused review, we concisely describe the virus infection cycle and highlight the recent findings of host cell pathways and cytosolic proteins that assist influenza uncoating during host cell entry. Keywords: influenza; capsid uncoating; HDAC6; ubiquitin; EPS8; TNPO1; pandemic; M1; virus– host interaction Citation: Moreira, E.A.; Yamauchi, Y.; Matthias, P. How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways during 1. Introduction Uncoating. Cells 2021, 10, 1722. Viruses are microscopic parasites that, unable to self-replicate, subvert a host cell https://doi.org/10.3390/ for their replication and propagation. Despite their apparent simplicity, they can cause cells10071722 severe diseases and even pose pandemic threats [1–3]. -
Module1: General Concepts
NPTEL – Biotechnology – General Virology Module1: General Concepts Lecture 1: Virus history The history of virology goes back to the late 19th century, when German anatomist Dr Jacob Henle (discoverer of Henle’s loop) hypothesized the existence of infectious agent that were too small to be observed under light microscope. This idea fails to be accepted by the present scientific community in the absence of any direct evidence. At the same time three landmark discoveries came together that formed the founding stone of what we call today as medical science. The first discovery came from Louis Pasture (1822-1895) who gave the spontaneous generation theory from his famous swan-neck flask experiment. The second discovery came from Robert Koch (1843-1910), a student of Jacob Henle, who showed for first time that the anthrax and tuberculosis is caused by a bacillus, and finally Joseph Lister (1827-1912) gave the concept of sterility during the surgery and isolation of new organism. The history of viruses and the field of virology are broadly divided into three phases, namely discovery, early and modern. The discovery phase (1886-1913) In 1879, Adolf Mayer, a German scientist first observed the dark and light spot on infected leaves of tobacco plant and named it tobacco mosaic disease. Although he failed to describe the disease, he showed the infectious nature of the disease after inoculating the juice extract of diseased plant to a healthy one. The next step was taken by a Russian scientist Dimitri Ivanovsky in 1890, who demonstrated that sap of the leaves infected with tobacco mosaic disease retains its infectious property even after its filtration through a Chamberland filter. -
Transport of Viral Specimens F
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, Apr. 1990, p. 120-131 Vol. 3, No. 2 0893-8512/90/020120-12$02.00/0 Copyright C) 1990, American Society for Microbiology Transport of Viral Specimens F. BRENT JOHNSON Department of Microbiology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 120 TRANSPORT SYSTEMS.......................................................................... 120 Swabs ........................................................................... 121 Swab-Tube Combinations ........................................................................... 121 Liquid Media .......................................................................... 122 Cell culture medium .......................................................................... 122 BSS and charcoal .......................................................................... 122 Broth-based media ........................................................................... 124 Bentonite-containing media .......................................................................... 124 Buffered sorbitol and sucrose-based solutions ........................................................................ 124 Transporters .......................................................................... 125 Viruses Adsorbed onto Filters .......................................................................... 125 Virus Stability in Transport Media: a Comparison ................................................................... -
Risk Groups: Viruses (C) 1988, American Biological Safety Association
Rev.: 1.0 Risk Groups: Viruses (c) 1988, American Biological Safety Association BL RG RG RG RG RG LCDC-96 Belgium-97 ID Name Viral group Comments BMBL-93 CDC NIH rDNA-97 EU-96 Australia-95 HP AP (Canada) Annex VIII Flaviviridae/ Flavivirus (Grp 2 Absettarov, TBE 4 4 4 implied 3 3 4 + B Arbovirus) Acute haemorrhagic taxonomy 2, Enterovirus 3 conjunctivitis virus Picornaviridae 2 + different 70 (AHC) Adenovirus 4 Adenoviridae 2 2 (incl animal) 2 2 + (human,all types) 5 Aino X-Arboviruses 6 Akabane X-Arboviruses 7 Alastrim Poxviridae Restricted 4 4, Foot-and- 8 Aphthovirus Picornaviridae 2 mouth disease + viruses 9 Araguari X-Arboviruses (feces of children 10 Astroviridae Astroviridae 2 2 + + and lambs) Avian leukosis virus 11 Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 3 (wild strain) + (ALV) 3, (Rous 12 Avian sarcoma virus Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 sarcoma virus, + RSV wild strain) 13 Baculovirus Viral vector/Animal virus 1 + Togaviridae/ Alphavirus (Grp 14 Barmah Forest 2 A Arbovirus) 15 Batama X-Arboviruses 16 Batken X-Arboviruses Togaviridae/ Alphavirus (Grp 17 Bebaru virus 2 2 2 2 + A Arbovirus) 18 Bhanja X-Arboviruses 19 Bimbo X-Arboviruses Blood-borne hepatitis 20 viruses not yet Unclassified viruses 2 implied 2 implied 3 (**)D 3 + identified 21 Bluetongue X-Arboviruses 22 Bobaya X-Arboviruses 23 Bobia X-Arboviruses Bovine 24 immunodeficiency Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 3 (wild strain) + virus (BIV) 3, Bovine Bovine leukemia 25 Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 lymphosarcoma + virus (BLV) virus wild strain Bovine papilloma Papovavirus/ -
Reverse Genetics of Rotavirus COMMENTARY Ulrich Desselbergera,1
COMMENTARY Reverse genetics of rotavirus COMMENTARY Ulrich Desselbergera,1 The genetics of viruses are determined by mutations clarify structure/function relationships of viral genes of their nucleic acid. Mutations can occur spontane- and their protein products and also elucidate complex ously or be produced by physical or chemical means: phenotypes, such as host restriction, pathogenicity, for example, the application of different temperatures and immunogenicity. or mutagens (such as hydroxylamine, nitrous acid, or Kanai et al. (1) have now developed a reverse ge- alkylating agents) that alter the nucleic acid. The clas- netics system for rotaviruses (RVs), which are a major sic way to study virus mutants is to identify a change in cause of acute gastroenteritis in infants and young chil- phenotype compared with the wild-type and to corre- dren and in many mammalian and avian species. World- late this with the mutant genotype (“forward genet- wide RV-associated disease still leads to the death of ics”). Mutants can be studied by complementation, over 200,000 children of <5 y of age per annum (2) recombination, or reassortment analyses. These ap- and thus represents a major public health problem. proaches, although very useful, are cumbersome and The work by Kanai et al. (1) is the most recent ad- prone to problems by often finding several mutations dition to a long list of plasmid-only–based reverse ge- in a genome that are difficult to correlate with a change netics systems of RNA viruses, a selection of which is in phenotype. With the availability of the nucleotide presented in Table 1 (3–13). -
Tick-Borne “Bourbon” Virus: Current Situation JEZS 2016; 4(3): 362-364 © 2016 JEZS and Future Implications Received: 15-03-2016
Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2016; 4(3): 362-364 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Tick-borne “Bourbon” Virus: Current situation JEZS 2016; 4(3): 362-364 © 2016 JEZS and future implications Received: 15-03-2016 Accepted: 16-04-2016 Asim Shamim and Muhammad Sohail Sajid Asim Shamim Department of Parasitology, Abstract Faculty of Veterinary Science, Ticks transmit wide range of virus to human and animals all over the globe. Bourbon virus is new tick University of Agriculture transmitted virus from bourbon county of United States of America. This is first reported case from Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. western hemisphere. The objective of this review is to share information regarding present situation of Muhammad Sohail Sajid this newly emerged virus and future challenges. Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Keywords: Global scenario, tick, bourbon virus University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. Introduction Ticks (Arthropoda: Acari), an obligate blood imbibing ecto-parasite of vertebrates [1] spreads mass of pathogens to humans and animals globally [2]. Ticks have been divided into two broad families on the base of their anatomical structure i.e. Ixodidae and Argasidae commonly called as hard and soft ticks respectively [3]. Approximately 900 species of ticks are on the record [4-6] [7] and 10% of these known tick species , communicate several types of pathogens to human and animals of both domestic and wild types. Ticks ranked next to mosquitos as vectors of human [8], and animal diseases. During the past few decades, it has been noticed that the number of reports on eco-epidemiology of tick-borne diseases increased [2]. -
Viral Strategies of Immune Function Impairment (Viral Evolution/Mathemadcal Models) SEBASTIAN BONHOEFFER and MARTIN A
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 8062-8066, August 1994 Evolution Intra-host versus inter-host selection: Viral strategies of immune function impairment (viral evolution/mathemadcal models) SEBASTIAN BONHOEFFER AND MARTIN A. NOWAK Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, OX1 3PS, Oxford, United Kingdom Communicated by Baruch S. Blumberg, April 14, 1994 ABSTRACT We investigate the evolution of viral strate- virus-infected cells. Vaccinia virus inhibits the classical path- gies to counteract immunological attack. These strategies can way ofcomplement activation (3). Both cowpox and vaccinia be divided into two classes: those that impair the immune virus developed proteins that interfere with interleukin 1 response inside or at the surface of a virus-infected cell and (4-6), a cytokine involved in a variety of inflammatory and those that impair the immune response outside an infected cell. immunological responses. Shope fibroma virus produces a The former strategies confer a "selfish" individual selective soluble TNF receptor, which acts as a decoy, binding TNF advantage for intra-host competition among viruses. The latter before it reaches the infected target cell (7). Similarly, strategies confer an "unselfish" selective advantage to the virus myxoma virus secrets IFN-y receptors (8). population as a group. A mutant, defective in the gene coding All these viral defense strategies seem advantageous for for the extracellular immune function-impairment strategy, the defense against the immune responses, but there is an may be protected from immune attack because the wild-type important difference between the adenovirus and the poxvi- virus in the same host successfully impairs the host's immune rus strategies listed above. -
Evolution of Influenza a Virus by Mutation and Re-Assortment
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Evolution of Influenza A Virus by Mutation and Re-Assortment Wenhan Shao 1, Xinxin Li 1, Mohsan Ullah Goraya 1, Song Wang 1,* and Ji-Long Chen 1,2,* 1 Key Laboratory of Fujian-Taiwan Animal Pathogen Biology, College of Animal Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China; [email protected] (W.S.); [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] (M.U.G.) 2 CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.W.); [email protected] (J.-L.C.); Tel.: +86-591-8375-8852 (S.W.); +86-591-8378-9159 (J.-L.C.) Received: 25 June 2017; Accepted: 24 July 2017; Published: 7 August 2017 Abstract: Influenza A virus (IAV), a highly infectious respiratory pathogen, has continued to be a significant threat to global public health. To complete their life cycle, influenza viruses have evolved multiple strategies to interact with a host. A large number of studies have revealed that the evolution of influenza A virus is mainly mediated through the mutation of the virus itself and the re-assortment of viral genomes derived from various strains. The evolution of influenza A virus through these mechanisms causes worldwide annual epidemics and occasional pandemics. Importantly, influenza A virus can evolve from an animal infected pathogen to a human infected pathogen. The highly pathogenic influenza virus has resulted in stupendous economic losses due to its morbidity and mortality both in human and animals. Influenza viruses fall into a category of viruses that can cause zoonotic infection with stable adaptation to human, leading to sustained horizontal transmission. -
By Virus Screening in DNA Samples
Figure S1. Research of endogeneous viral element (EVE) by virus screening in DNA samples: comparison of Cp values results obtained when detecting the viruses in DNA samples (Light gray) versus Cp values results obtained in the corresponding RNA samples (Dark gray). *: significative difference with p-value < 0.05 (T-test). The S segment of the LTV were found in only one DNA sample and in the corresponding RNA sample. KTV has been detected in one DNA sample but not in the corresponding RNA sample. Figure S2. Luciferase activity (in LU/mL) distribution of measures after LIPS performed in tick/cattle interface for the screening of antibodies specific to Lihan tick virus (LTV), Karukera tick virus (KTV) and Wuhan tick virus 2 (WhTV2). Positivity threshold is indicated for each antigen construct with a dashed line. Table S1. List of tick-borne viruses targeted by the microfluidic PCR system (Gondard et al., 2018) Family Genus Species Asfarviridae Asfivirus African swine fever virus (ASFV) Orthomyxoviridae Thogotovirus Thogoto virus (THOV) Dhori virus (DHOV) Reoviridae Orbivirus Kemerovo virus (KEMV) Coltivirus Colorado tick fever virus (CTFV) Eyach virus (EYAV) Bunyaviridae Nairovirus Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHF) Dugbe virus (DUGV) Nairobi sheep disease virus (NSDV) Phlebovirus Uukuniemi virus (UUKV) Orthobunyavirus Schmallenberg (SBV) Flaviviridae Flavivirus Tick-borne encephalitis virus European subtype (TBE) Tick-borne encephalitis virus Far-Eastern subtype (TBE) Tick-borne encephalitis virus Siberian subtype (TBE) Louping ill virus (LIV) Langat virus (LGTV) Deer tick virus (DTV) Powassan virus (POWV) West Nile virus (WN) Meaban virus (MEAV) Omsk Hemorrhagic fever virus (OHFV) Kyasanur forest disease virus (KFDV).