R004 Malahide Viaduct Collapse on the Dublin to Belfast Line, on the 21 August 2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

R004 Malahide Viaduct Collapse on the Dublin to Belfast Line, on the 21 August 2009 Investigation Report No. 2010 – R004 August 2010 Malahide Viaduct Collapse on the Dublin to Belfast Line, on the 21st August 2009 Malahide Viaduct Collapse on the Dublin to Belfast Line, on the 21st August 2009 Document History Title Malahide Viaduct Collapse on the Dublin to Belfast Line on the 21st August 2009 Document type Investigation Report Document number R2010 – 004 Document issue date 16/08/2010 Revision Revision Summary of changes number date 1 17/08/2010 Photograph 3 caption change 2 20/10/2010 Report and footers renumbered. Typographical error correction in paragraph 5 of Section 11. Figure 19 is now Figure 22, Figures 20 – 22 renamed. Additional RAIU and RSC terms added to Section 46.1. RAIU ii Investigation Report 2010 – R004 Rev 2 Malahide Viaduct Collapse on the Dublin to Belfast Line, on the 21st August 2009 Role of the Railway Accident Investigation Unit The Railway Accident Investigation Unit (RAIU) is an independent investigation unit within the Railway Safety Commission (RSC). The RAIU conducts investigations into accidents and incidents. The purpose of an investigation by the RAIU is to improve railway safety by establishing, in so far as possible, the cause or causes of an accident or incident with a view to making safety recommendations for the avoidance of accidents in the future, or otherwise for the improvement of railway safety. It is not the purpose of an investigation to attribute blame or liability. The RAIU‟s investigations are carried out in accordance with the Railway Safety Act 2005 and European railway safety directive 2004/49/EC. Any enquiries about this report should be sent to: RAIU Trident House Blackrock County Dublin Ireland RAIU iii Investigation Report 2010 – R004 Rev 2 Malahide Viaduct Collapse on the Dublin to Belfast Line, on the 21st August 2009 Executive Summary On the 21st August 2009 as an Iarnród Éireann passenger service, travelling from Balbriggan to Pearse, passed over the Malahide Viaduct the driver witnessed a section of the viaduct beginning to collapse into Broadmeadow Estuary. The driver reported this to the controlling signalman who immediately set all relevant signals to danger ensuring no trains travelled over the viaduct. Within minutes of the report of the accident, by the driver, Pier 4 of the Malahide Viaduct had collapsed into the Broadmeadow Estuary. All post accident emergency procedures were properly employed by the operating staff resulting in no fatalities or injuries to any members of the public or staff. At the time of the accident, the Malahide Viaduct piers were formed on a grouted rock armour weir, with stones intermittently discharged along this weir to maintain its profile. The immediate cause of the collapse of Pier 4 was as a result of the undermining of the weir that surrounds and supports Pier 4 through the action of scouring. This was as a result of a combination of factors: An inspection carried out on the Malahide Viaduct three days before the accident did not identify the scouring defects visible at the time; A scour inspection undertaken in 2006 did not identify the Malahide Viaduct as a high-risk structure to the effects of scouring; Iarnród Éireanns likely failure to take any action after an independent inspection carried out on the Malahide Viaduct in 1997 identified that scouring had started at the base of Pier 4 and that the rock armour weir was “too light for the job”; The historic maintenance regime for the discharge of stones along the Malahide Viaduct appears to have ceased in 1996, resulting in the deterioration of the weir which was protecting the structure against scouring. The above factors were necessary for the accident to happen. Contributory to the accident happening were the following factors: Iarnród Éireann had not developed a flood/scour management plan at the time of the accident, despite the IRMS Implementation Review (2001) and the AD Little Review (2006) recommending that this plan be developed. Contributory to Iarnród Éireann not developing this flood/scour management plan was the fact that the Railway Safety Commission closed this recommendation in 2008; Engineers were not appropriately trained for inspection duties, in that the inspections training course they completed was an abridged version of the intended format, and there no formal mentoring programme, for Engineers on completion of this course; RAIU iv Investigation Report 2010 – R004 Rev 2 Malahide Viaduct Collapse on the Dublin to Belfast Line, on the 21st August 2009 There was a shortfall in Iarnród Éireann‟s suite of structural inspection standards in that a standard which provided guidance for inspectors in carrying out inspections was not formalised; There existed an unrealistic requirement for patrol gangers to carry out annual checks for scour, as they do not have access under the structure and in addition, they did not have the required specialist training/ skills to identify defects caused by scouring; A formal programme for Special Inspections for structures vulnerable to scour was not adopted, as per Iarnród Éireanns‟s Structural Inspections Standard, I-STR-6510, at the time of the accident. Underlying factors to the accident were: There was a loss of corporate memory when former Iarnród Éireann staff left the Division, which resulted in valuable information in the relation to the historic scouring and maintenance not being available to the staff in place at the time of the accident; There was a dearth of information in relation to the Malahide Viaduct due to Iarnród Éireanns failure to properly introduce their information asset management system; Iarnród Éireanns inadequate resourcing of Engineers for structural inspections to be carried out at the Malahide Viaduct; Iarnród Éireanns failure to meet all the requirements of their Structural Inspections Standard, I-STR-6510, in that: o Visual inspections were not carried out for all visible elements of structures; o Bridge Inspection Cards, for recording findings of inspections, were not completed to standard or approved by the relevant personnel; o A formal programme for systematic visual inspections of all elements of a structure, including hidden or submerged elements, despite an independent review recommending that Iarnród Éireann implement this programme in 2006. Immediately after the accident, Iarnród Éireann carried out inspections on over a hundred viaducts on the network. Iarnród Éireann have now reinstating the Malahide Viaduct, ensuring that the overall structure has been significantly strengthened, that the weir profile has been restored and improved. Iarnród Éireann are currently reviewing all the Civil Engineering technical standards in order to improve the content, readability and practicable implementation of these standards. Improved control mechanisms are being introduced to ensure compliance with these standards. A competency management system is also being implemented to ensure the appropriate training is received by Engineers. RAIU v Investigation Report 2010 – R004 Rev 2 Malahide Viaduct Collapse on the Dublin to Belfast Line, on the 21st August 2009 In relation to tracking recommendations made by independent organisation, the Railway Safety Commission has formalised their system for closing recommendations, and is now, in conjunction with Iarnród Éireann developing an action plan to close all outstanding recommendations. As a result of the findings of this RAIU investigation, the RAIU have made fifteen safety recommendations. Thirteen safety recommendations have been made to Iarnród Éireann, one safety recommendation has been made to the Railway Safety Commission, and one joint recommendation has been made to Iarnród Éireann and the Railway Safety Commission. Recommendation 1 Iarnród Éireann should put appropriate interface processes in place to ensure that when designated track patrolling staff (who report to two or more divisional areas) are absent from their patrolling duties, that appropriate relief track patrolling staff are assigned to perform these patrolling duties. Recommendation 2 Iarnród Éireann should amend the Track Patrolling Standard, I-PWY-1307, to remove the requirement for track patrollers to carry out annual checks for scour. Recommendation 3 Iarnród Éireann should formalise their „Civil Engineering and Earthworks Structures: Guidance Notes on Inspections Standard‟, I-STR-6515, which should include guidance for inspectors on conducting inspections and identifying structural defects. On formalising this document Iarnród Éireann should re- issue, in the appropriate format, to all relevant personnel. Recommendation 4 Iarnród Éireann should introduce a verification process to ensure that all requirements of their Structural Inspections Standard, I-STR-6510, are carried out in full. Recommendation 5 Iarnród Éireann should ensure that a system is put in place for effective implementation of existing standards and to manage the timely introduction of new and revised standards. Recommendation 6 Iarnród Éireann should ensure that a programme of structural inspections is started immediately in accordance with their Standard for Structural Inspection, I-STR-6510, and ensure that adequate resources are available to undertake these inspections. RAIU vi Investigation Report 2010 – R004 Rev 2 Malahide Viaduct Collapse on the Dublin to Belfast Line, on the 21st August 2009 Recommendation 7 Iarnród Éireann should carry out inspections for all bridges subject to the passage of water for their vulnerability to scour, and where possible identify the bridge
Recommended publications
  • Fingal County Council
    Fingal County Council Final Scoping Report for the Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study Report by Mott MacDonald Pettit Limited In association with ERM Limited Mr. A. Carthy Director of Services Water Services Department Fingal County Council PO Box 174 Main Street Swords County Dublin Mott MacDonald Pettit Ltd South Block Rockfield Dundrum Dublin 16 June 2007 Fingal County Council Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study – Strategic Environmental Assessment Final Scoping Report REVISION CONTROL TABLE User Is Responsible For Checking The Revision Status Of This Document Rev. Nr. Description of Prepared by Checked by Approved by Date Changes A Initial Issue* P.K./O.H. S. O’R. D.B. Feb. ‘07 B Final Issue* P.K./O.H. S. O’R. D.B. Mar. ‘07 C Initial Issue P.K./O.H. S. O’R. D.B. June ‘07 D Final Issue P.K./O.H. S. O’R. P.K. June ‘07 * : Draft SEA Scoping Report which was made available for public consultation No part of this document may be re-produced or transmitted in any form or stored in any retrieval system of any nature, without the written permission of Mott MacDonald Pettit Limited, as Copyright Holder, except as agreed for use on this specific project. Doc. Nr. 232351(P9680)-N-R-02-D ii of iii Fingal County Council Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study – Strategic Environmental Assessment Final Scoping Report Contents 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………....1 1.1 GENERAL 1.2 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) 1.3 PURPOSE OF THE DRAFT SEA SCOPING REPORT 1.4 STRUCTURE OF THIS
    [Show full text]
  • DART-Plus-Brochure-17-08-2020
    Contents 1. What is the DART+ Programme? 1 2. DART+ Programme - The Facts 2 3. Why DART? 3 4. The evolution of DART 4 5. Why do we need DART+ Programme? 5 6. What are the benefits of the project? 7 7. Core Elements of the Programme 9 7.1 DART+ West 9 7.2 DART+ South West 10 7.3 DART+ Coastal North 11 7.4 DART+ Coastal South 12 8. Next Steps 13 9. DART+ Programme Key Milestones 15 1. What is the DART+ Programme? 1 2. DART+ Programme - The Facts 2 3. Why DART? 3 4. The evolution of DART 4 5. Why do we need DART+ Programme? 5 6. What are the benefits of the project? 7 7. Core Elements of the Programme 9 7.1 DART+ West 9 7.2 DART+ South West 10 7.3 DART+ Coastal North 11 7.4 DART+ Coastal South 12 8. Next Steps 13 9. DART+ Programme Key Milestones 15 DART+ Programme Passenger capacity and train service frequency 1. What is the will be significantly increased as a result of the project. This will help to deliver a more efficient DART+ Programme? transport system, allowing more people to sustainably travel to more places than before. The DART+ Programme is a transformative DART+ Programme will provide a viable, programme of projects which aims to modernise sustainable alternative to private car use, therefore and improve existing rail services in the Greater helping users reduce their carbon footprint. Dublin Area (GDA). It will provide a sustainable, electrified, reliable and more frequent rail service DART+ Programme will provide frequent, modern, improving capacity on the rail corridors serving electrified services to Drogheda on the Northern Dublin.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Study of the Coastal Habitats in County Fingal Habitats Phase I & II Flora
    Ecological Study of the Coastal Habitats in County Fingal Habitats Phase I & II Flora Fingal County Council November 2004 Supported by Ecological Study of the Coastal Habitats in County Fingal Phase I & II Habitats & Flora Prepared by: Dr. D. Doogue, Ecological Consultant D. Tiernan, Fingal County Council, Parks Division H. Visser, Fingal County Council, Parks Division November 2004 Supported by Michael A. Lynch, Senior Parks Superintendent. Table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Objectives 2 1.2 The Study Area 3 1.3 Acknowledgements 4 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 The Habitat Mapping 6 2.2 The Vegetation Survey 6 2.3 The Rare Plant Survey 6 3 RESULTS 3.1 Habitat Classes 8 3.1.1 The Coastland 8 3.1.1.1 Rocky Sea Cliffs 8 3.1.2.2 Sea stacks and islets 9 3.1.1.3 Sedimentary sea cliffs 9 3.1.1.4 Shingle and Gravel banks 10 3.1.1.5 Embryonic dunes 10 3.1.1.6 Marram dunes 11 3.1.1.7 Fixed dunes 11 3.1.1.8 Dune scrub and woodland 12 3.1.1.9 Dune slacks 12 3.1.1.10 Coastal Constructions 12 3.1.2 Estuaries 12 3.1.2.1 Mud shores 13 3.1.2.2 Lower saltmarsh 13 3.1.2.3 Upper saltmarsh 14 3.1.3 Seashore 15 3.1.3.1 Sediment shores 15 3.1.3.2 Rocky seashores 15 3.2 Habitat Maps & Site Reports 16 3.2.1 Delvin 17 3.2.2 Cardy Point 19 3.2.3 Balbriggan 21 3.2.4 Isaac’s Bower 23 3.2.5 Hampton 26 3.2.6 Skerries – Barnageeragh 28 3.2.7 Red Island 31 3.2.8 Skerries Shore 31 3.2.9 Loughshinny 33 3.2.10 North Rush to Loughshinny 37 3.2.11 Rush Sandhills 38 3.2.12 Rogerstown Shore 41 3.2.13 Portrane Burrow 43 3.2.14 Corballis 46 3.2.15 Portmarnock 49 3.2.16 The Howth Peninsula 56 4.
    [Show full text]
  • UCD Commuting Guide
    University College Dublin An Coláiste Ollscoile, Baile Átha Cliath CAMPUS COMMUTING GUIDE Belfield 2015/16 Commuting Check your by Bus (see overleaf for Belfield bus map) UCD Real Time Passenger Information Displays Route to ArrivED • N11 bus stop • Internal campus bus stops • Outside UCD James Joyce Library Campus • In UCD O’Brien Centre for Science Arriving autumn ‘15 using • Outside UCD Student Centre Increased UCD Services Public ArrivED • UCD now designated a terminus for x route buses (direct buses at peak times) • Increased services on 17, 142 and 145 routes serving the campus Transport • UCD-DART shuttle bus to Sydney Parade during term time Arriving autumn ‘15 • UCD-LUAS shuttle bus to Windy Arbour on the LUAS Green Line during Transport for Ireland term time Transport for Ireland (www.transportforireland.ie) Dublin Bus Commuter App helps you plan journeys, door-to-door, anywhere in ArrivED Ireland, using public transport and/or walking. • Download Dublin Bus Live app for updates on arriving buses Hit the Road Don’t forget UCD operates a Taxsaver Travel Pass Scheme for staff commuting by Bus, Dart, LUAS and Rail. Hit the Road (www.hittheroad.ie) shows you how to get between any two points in Dublin City, using a smart Visit www.ucd.ie/hr for details. combination of Dublin Bus, LUAS and DART routes. Commuting Commuting by Bike/on Foot by Car Improvements to UCD Cycling & Walking Facilities Parking is limited on campus and available on a first come first served basis exclusively for persons with business in UCD. Arrived All car parks are designated either permit parking or hourly paid.
    [Show full text]
  • Lands at Richmond Cheshire House
    FOR SALE BY PRIVATE TREATY Lands at Richmond Cheshire House RICHMOND PARK, MONKSTOWN, CO. DUBLIN Lands at Richmond Cheshire House RICHMOND PARK, MONKSTOWN, CO. DUBLIN LOCATED IN ONE OF DUBLIN’S MOST SOUGHT AFTER AND PRESTIGIOUS RESIDENTIAL AREAS 0.948 HA (2.343 ACRES) APPROX. Superb Development Opportunity (S.P.P) 2 3 Summary Exceptional development site in one of Dublin’s most sought after and prestigious villages. Site extends to approximately 0.948 hectares (2.343 acres). Nestled away just off Monkstown Road, the lands are situated minutes from Monkstown Village and its bustling mix of coffee shops, bars, restaurants and boutiques. The location offers unparalleled access to both the DART and quality bus routes, with Monkstown/Salthill DART station just a five minute walk away, providing a direct link to the heart of Dublin city centre and beyond. Within close proximity to the site are a number of recreational activities including parks, the marina at Dun Laoghaire, many scenic walks along the sea front and a number of rugby, hockey & golf clubs. The property is currently occupied under a licence agreement which commenced on the 19th December 2014 for a period of 36 months, with early vacation anticipated before term end. 4 5 Location Dun Laoghaire Pier The subject site is located approximately 200 metres southeast of the centre of Monkstown village, one of the most sought after and prestigious residential address in Dublin. Monkstown is noted for its spectacular coastline that boasts a wide range of bars, cafés, DUN restaurants and boutique shops as well as an array of Georgian LAOGHAIRE and Edwardian houses.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitechurch Stream Flood Alleviation Scheme
    WHITECHURCH STREAM FLOOD ALLEVIATION SCHEME Environmental Report MDW0825 Environmental Report F01 06 Jul. 20 rpsgroup.com WHITECHURCH STREAM FAS-ER Document status Version Purpose of document Authored by Reviewed by Approved by Review date A01 For Approval HC PC MD 09/04/20 A02 For Approval HC PC MD 02/06/20 F01 For Issue HC PC MD 06/07/20 Approval for issue Mesfin Desta 6 July 2020 © Copyright RPS Group Limited. All rights reserved. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client and unless otherwise agreed in writing by RPS Group Limited no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of this report. The report has been compiled using the resources agreed with the client and in accordance with the scope of work agreed with the client. No liability is accepted by RPS Group Limited for any use of this report, other than the purpose for which it was prepared. RPS Group Limited accepts no responsibility for any documents or information supplied to RPS Group Limited by others and no legal liability arising from the use by others of opinions or data contained in this report. It is expressly stated that no independent verification of any documents or information supplied by others has been made. RPS Group Limited has used reasonable skill, care and diligence in compiling this report and no warranty is provided as to the report’s accuracy. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced, by any means, without the written permission of RPS Group Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Rail and Luas Ticketing
    Irish Rail and Luas Ticketing List of Valid and Not Valid Tickets on Luas November 2004 1. Single and Return Add-On Tickets Valid on Luas 2. Single and Return Add-On Tickets NOT Valid on Luas 3. Rail Season Add-On Tickets Valid on Luas 4. Rail Luas ‘Combi’ Tickets 5. Rail Tickets NOT valid on Luas 1 1. Single and Return Add-On Tickets Valid on Luas 1.1 Into Heuston Station – Valid all Luas stops to Connolly Station Only Cork etc. Has LUAS and INCL. FEEDER SERV. = Valid Cork etc. Has INCL. FEEDER SERV. = Valid 2 1.2 Into Connolly Station – Valid all Luas stops to Heuston Station Only Sutton etc. Has LUAS = Valid Sutton etc. Has LUAS = Valid Single and Return Add-On Tickets into Connolly or Heuston are only valid if they have either: - LUAS or - INCL. FEEDER SERV Printed. 3 2. Single and Return Add-On Tickets NOT Valid on Luas 2.1 Into Connolly Station Sutton etc. Has Heuston Bus Stop Only = Not Valid 2.2 Into Heuston Station Clondalkin etc. HAZELHATCH DUBLIN CITY CENTRE Has Dublin City Centre Only = Not Valid Single and Return Add-On Tickets into Connolly or Heuston are NOT valid if they do not have: - LUAS or - INCL. FEEDER SERV Printed. 4 3. Rail Season Add-On Tickets Valid on Luas 3.1 Existing into Connolly or Heuston Stations - Valid all Luas stops between Connolly and Heuston Stations Only – Daily, Weekly or Monthly Has LUAS and I.F.S. = Valid I.F.S. = Includes Feeder Services Has I.F.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Blanchardstown Urban Structure Plan Development Strategy and Implementation
    BLANCHARDSTOWN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY URBAN STRUCTURE PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION VISION, DEVELOPMENT THEMES AND OPPORTUNITIES PLANNING DEPARTMENT SPRING 2007 BLANCHARDSTOWN URBAN STRUCTURE PLAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION VISION, DEVELOPMENT THEMES AND OPPORTUNITIES PLANNING DEPARTMENT • SPRING 2007 David O’Connor, County Manager Gilbert Power, Director of Planning Joan Caffrey, Senior Planner BLANCHARDSTOWN URBAN STRUCTURE PLAN E DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION G A 01 SPRING 2007 P Contents Page INTRODUCTION . 2 SECTION 1: OBJECTIVES OF THE BLANCHARDSTOWN URBAN STRUCTURE PLAN – DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 3 BACKGROUND PLANNING TO DATE . 3 VISION STATEMENT AND KEY ISSUES . 5 SECTION 2: DEVELOPMENT THEMES 6 INTRODUCTION . 6 THEME: COMMERCE RETAIL AND SERVICES . 6 THEME: SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY . 8 THEME: TRANSPORT . 9 THEME: LEISURE, RECREATION & AMENITY . 11 THEME: CULTURE . 12 THEME: FAMILY AND COMMUNITY . 13 SECTION 3: DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES – ESSENTIAL INFRASTRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS 14 SECTION 4: DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY AREAS 15 Area 1: Blanchardstown Town Centre . 16 Area 2: Blanchardstown Village . 19 Area 3: New District Centre at Coolmine, Porterstown, Clonsilla . 21 Area 4: Blanchardstown Institute of Technology and Environs . 24 Area 5: Connolly Memorial Hospital and Environs . 25 Area 6: International Sports Campus at Abbotstown. (O.P.W.) . 26 Area 7: Existing and Proposed District & Neighbourhood Centres . 27 Area 8: Tyrrellstown & Environs Future Mixed Use Development . 28 Area 9: Hansfield SDZ Residential and Mixed Use Development . 29 Area 10: North Blanchardstown . 30 Area 11: Dunsink Lands . 31 SECTION 5: RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS 32 BLANCHARDSTOWN URBAN STRUCTURE PLAN E G DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION A 02 P SPRING 2007 Introduction Section 1 details the key issues and need for an Urban Structure Plan – Development Strategy as the planning vision for the future of Blanchardstown.
    [Show full text]
  • Flaws of Metro North Rail Gauge
    Flaws of Metro North Rail Gauge I have waited for a transport solution for over fifty years and now on the verge of a solution it’s about to be destroyed again on the width of a rail track or gauge. This problem has arisen be- cause planners in the nineties decided that Ireland should have a different gauge. In the past Ireland used different rail gauges and suffered as a result. Rail disappeared in all areas where they had narrow gauge. Rail gauge is very important. This mistake was made in many countries where governments decided on different gauges to protect their country. Here is a list of some of the problems by using a different rail gauge system for Metro North. 1. Metro serves a small area of Dublin. Most of Dublin and rest of Ireland loose out. 2. Delays transport solution to other areas by decades, even Swords, shorter Metro. 3. Extremely costly. Requires almost a 20 Euro subsidy for each usage. Ensures train fares remain extremely high. Requires costly underground and duplication. 4. All via the centre. Almost all users must go via the centre, unnecessary changing. Example users from Blanchardstown, North Dublin, Dundalk Line and Malahide Dart must go into Connolly Stn. take Luas to O Connell St. for Metro. Repeat for return trip. All other train routes use three rail modes to get to Airport. 5. Undermines the efficiency of bus routes and other rail lines by forcing users into centre to access Metro, using up scarce capacity at peak travel time. 6. Congestion.
    [Show full text]
  • Lands at Malahide Road, Kinsaley Village, Co. Dublin
    Lands at Malahide Road, Kinsaley Village, Co. Dublin Exceptional Residential Development Opportunity S.P.P. For Sale By Private Treaty on the instruction of Receiver Portmarnock DART Station Chapel Road Malahide Road Baskin Lane Lands at Kinsaley Village, Co. Dublin Howth Dublin City Centre Hilton Hotel Applegreen Malahide/ Portmarnock Educate Together Kinsealy Garden Centre & Cafe Baskin Lane Dublin Airport Portmarnock Chapel Road St Olave’s Business Centre Overview • Exceptional Development Opportunity S.P.P • Site extending to approx. 6.52 hectares (16.10 acres) • Excellent residential location approx. 4km south of Malahide Village Malahide Road • Located within Kinsaley Local Area Plan • Majority zoned ‘Rural Village’ which supports residential development of 8-9 units per acre Malahide For indicative purposes only Dun Na Si M2 Ardrums Swords D 5 2 Malahide A Rathrone M1 O R 2 E D Kilcloon M3 DUBLIN I Location N2 AIRPORT H Portmarnock A Dunboyne KINSALEY L Kinsaley Village is located approximately 11km north east of A Enfield 1 M4 4 M Dublin City Centre and approximately 4km south of Malahide Clonee 4 3 4 M50 Village. Kinsaley is an expanding suburban location that has 5 witnessed significant residential development in recent years. Johnstown N32 Bridge The property is located in the centre of the village directly Ongar Santry 2 Moyglare Hall 3 Finglas opposite the church and St Olave’s Business Centre on the 2 Beaumont Sutton Malahide Road. Maynooth Howth Kilshanroe 6 N2 M50 The village is mainly characterised by mature housing with Port Tunnel Clontarf amenities such as a school, church, petrol filling station and Drumcondra Fanagh M50 Castleknock a small business centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Accident Investigation Unit Annual Report
    Railway Accident Investigation Unit Ireland Annual Report i 2018 Foreword The purpose of the Railway Accident Investigation Unit (RAIU) is to independently investigate occurrences on Irish railways with a view to establishing their cause/s and make safety recommendations to prevent their reoccurrence or otherwise improve railway safety. It is not the purpose of an investigation to attribute blame or liability. In 2018, fifty-two preliminary examination reports (PERs) were completed by the RAIU based on reports of incidents and accidents from Transdev and Iarnród Éireann (IÉ); including reports of: rolling stock faults; Road Rail Vehicle (RRV) occurrences; self-harm occurrences; earthworks failures; energy faults; tram and heavy rail derailments in depots; cattle strikes; tram road traffic collisions; fire; buffer stop collisions and one user worked level crossing collision accident. Of the fifty-two PERs, three full investigations into individual incidents/accidents that occurred on the IÉ network, namely: • Collision of an InterCity Railcar with a buffer stop at Laois Train Care Depot, 17th July 2018; • Wrongside Door Failure at Ashtown Station, 12th August 2018; • Vehicle struck by train at Cartron level crossing, XM220, Co. Mayo, 17th August 2018. In addition, a trend investigation into RRV incidents and accidents on the IÉ network was commenced, which includes the review of RRV occurrences from 2015 to 2018, inclusive. One investigation report was published in 2018, ‘Derailment of DART passenger service, at Points DL115, Dun Laoghaire, 13th September 2017’ resulting in a total of seven new safety recommendations being issued. The new recommendations related to: the training and competency of staff in terms of performance of duties and safety critical communications; management of major customer disruptions; the design and fitment of points clips; and, the placement of detonator protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth and Sport Development Services
    Youth and Sport Development Services Socio-economic profile of area and an analysis of current provision 2018 A socio economic analysis of the six areas serviced by the DDLETB Youth Service and a detailed breakdown of the current provision. Contents Section 3: Socio-demographic Profile OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 7 General Health ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 Crime ......................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Deprivation Index ...................................................................................................................................................... 33 Educational attainment/Profile ................................................................................................................................. 38 Key findings from Socio Demographic Profile ........................................................................................................... 42 Socio-demographic Profile DDLETB by Areas an Overview ........................................................................................... 44 Demographic profile of young people ....................................................................................................................... 44 Pobal
    [Show full text]