DOCSLIB.ORG

The Role of Welfare State in Norway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Role of Welfare State in Norway ساعت: امضاء صفحه آرا: ساعت: امضاء مسئول صفحه: ساعت: امضاء ادیتور:ADVERTISEMENTS ساعت: امضاء سردبیر: I N T E R N A T I O N A L D A I L Y APRILAPRIL 28, 2019 ANALYSISADVERTISEMENT & INTERVIEW 7 The role of welfare state in Norway sixth largest import partner and its total imports References By Hanif Ghaffari to Norway in 2015 amounted to $ 4.4 billion or 5.7 1)Carlgren, Fredrik. (28 September 2012). TEHRAN — Norway is located in Northern Europe percent of Norway’s total imports. South Korea “Snabba fakta om svensk export”, available at: and is one of the Nordic countries and a member of was seventh import partner for Norway in 2015, http: //www. ekonomifakta.se/Artiklar/2012/ NATO. The country has long borders with Sweden which accounted for 4.2% of Europe’s imports. September/Snabba-fakta-om-svensk-export/ and in other sides with Finland.30% of the work- After South Korea, the Netherlands is the eighth (Retrieved on 2015-01- 29) forces in Norway are working in the public sector, import partner and 3.6 percent of the country’s 2)Carlgren, Fredrik. (30 May 2016). “BNP per which rate is highest among the Organization for imports are made from Netherlands. capita”, Available at: http://www. ekonomifak- Economic Cooperation and Development (Statis- France and Poland are the ninth and tenth ta. se/Fakta/Ekonomi/Tillvaxt/BNP-per-capita/ tics Norway, 2014: 24). The Norwegian govern- import partners of Norway, accounting for 3.3 (Retrieved at: 27 July 2016). ment is large owners in key industries such as the and 3 percent of total imports in 2015 respective- 3)Ipsen, Erik. (20 November 1992). “Krona’s strategic petroleum sector (Statoil), hydroelectric ly (World’s Richest Countries, 22 March 2016). Fall Threatens a New Currency Crisis in Europe”, power generation (Statkraft), aluminum produc- Table 7. Ten import partners of Norway in 2015 Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/1992/11/20/ tion (Norsk Hydro), the largest Norwegian bank (World’s Richest Countries, 22 May 2016) No. news/20iht-swed_2.html (Retrieved on 2015-05- 15) (DNB), and telecommunications service provider Country Imports (%) No. Country Imports (%) 4)Nyheter, Dagens. (26 May 2010). “Miljöpartiet round (Telenor). Through these big companies, 1 Sweden 11.5 6 Denmark 5.7 2 Germany 11.3 7 chattade om kärnkraften: Riksdagsledamoten Per government controls about 30% of the shares in South Korea 4.2 3 China 10.4 8 Norway 3.6 4 Eng- Bolund (MP) svarade på läsarnas frågor”, Available the Oslo Stock Exchange. land 6.4 9 France 3.3 5 The US 6.3 10 Poland 3 at: http://www.dn.se/nyheter/chattarkiv/miljop- Although in the two referenda in 1972 and Conclusion The Political Economy of Sweden and artietchattade-om-karnkraften/(Retrived at: 27 1994, Norwegian citizens have rejected joining Norway each is a kind of unique political economy Deember 2016). the EU, Norway, along with Liechtenstein and Ice- in the world. Such uniqueness is on the one hand 5)Persson, Mats. (14 September 2013). “Ten land are actively involved in Europe Free Trade the product of special geographic situation and years on, what Britain can learn from the Swed- Association (EØS-loven, 27 October 1992). As national income and wealth and small population ish euro referendum”, Available at: https://www. mentioned, Norway has a population of about 5 of the two countries. theguardian. com/commentisfree/2013/sep/14/ million. This is despite the fact that the country However, the main variables, namely the ex- swedish-euroreferendum-britain-learn (Retrived has abundant natural resources of oil and gas. istence of the welfare state in Sweden and Norway on 2016-02-01) 6)Static Sweden. (2016). “Exports Norway’s revenue from these sources (in proportion cannot ignore. Any interpretation of foreign policy, and imports of goods and services (1993- )”, Avail- to its population) is very high. Revenues from oil domestic politics and the economy of Sweden and able at: http://www.scb.se/sv_/Hitta-statistik/ Norway should be based on what the government and gas exports is half of total exports and over ports. Belgium where Europe Union’s headquarters cent of total imports in 2015 respectively (World’s Statistik-efter-amne/Nationalrakenskaper/Na- has done relative to the welfare state. Here, “welfare 20 percent of Norway’s gross domestic product. are located accounted for 4.9 percent of Norway’s Richest Countries, 22 March 2016). tionalrakenskaper/Nationalrakenskaper-kvar- state” should be considered as an independent Norway’s fifth largest oil exporter and third largest exports and placed sixth. Also 4.4 percent of total The Political Economy of Sweden and Norway tals- -och-arsberakningar/Aktuell-Pong/22918/ variable in the economic, political and security gas producer in the world; However, Norway is exports is made to the United States of America. each is a kind of unique political economy in the Diagram/219327/, (Retrieved on 2016-01-15) equations of the two countries of Sweden and Nor- not an OPEC member. Denmark, the other Nordic Cooperation Council’s world. Such uniqueness is on the one hand the 7)Statistika Centralbyran. (2016). “Svensk way. Membership in Scandinavia and the Nordic As a result, the country’s oil policies are not member, is eighth partner of Norway in exports product of special geographic situation and na- ekonomi är beroende av exporten”, Available at: countries strengthens the role of the welfare state OPEC-compliant (Statistics Norway, 2009: 40). and 3.7% of Norway’s total exports are made to tional income and wealth and small population of http://www. sverigeisiffror. scb. se/hitta-statis- in this regard. Promoting social democracy in the Norway follows model of prosperous countries that country. China and South Korea are the ninth the two countries. However, the main variables, tik/sverige-i-siffror/ samhallets-ekonomi/ex- 19th and 20th centuries has been productive of a of Northern Europe (Sweden). These countries and tenth export partners of Norway and Norway namely the existence of the welfare state in Sweden port-och-import-av-varor-ochtjanster/ (Retrieved structure that is called the Scandinavian welfare provide in return for tax-heavy universal health respectively account for 2.8 and 1.9 percent of and Norway cannot ignore. Any interpretation of at: 19 January 2016). state (the three countries, Sweden, Norway and insurance, welfare and education subsidies to their each of these countries’ exports (World’s Richest foreign policy, domestic politics and the economy 8)Acher, John. (6 September 2007). “Update Denmark) today. Political and economic structur- citizens. In Norway as well as Sweden there is a Countries, 30 May 2016). of Sweden and Norway should be based on what the 1-Statistics Norway Raises ‘07 GDP Outlook, Cuts al adjustment of Norway and Sweden with new comprehensive system of social security. Norway Condition of import in Norway In 2015, Nor- government has done relative to the welfare state. ‘08”, Available at: http://uk.reuters.com/article/nor- theories in the field of political economy and in- has one of the highest human development indica- way’s imports from different countries were $ Here, “welfare state” should be considered wayeconomy-forecasts-idUKL0674675920070906 ternational relations occur in favor of concepts tors in the world (United Nations, 2011). Another 76.3 billion. As seen, Norway’s import is lower as an independent variable in the economic, (Retrieved at: 8 March 2015). and elements associated with the welfare state point is related to oil economy of Norway. Norway’s than exports by about $ 30 billion less. This issue political and security equations of the two 9)Dwyer, Liz. (3 November 2015). “This Is in these two countries. revenues from crude oil sales are not spend as shows concerns of the Norwegian government to countries of Sweden and Norway. Member- the World’s Most Prosperous Nation (Hint: It’s The factors of establishment of the welfare state current spending but are reserved in a separate create balance between exports and imports is in ship in Scandinavia and the Nordic countries Not the U.S.)”, Available at: http://www.takepart. in Sweden and Norway can be divided into three fund. The value of the fund is estimated at $ 900 line with the emphasis on export-led economy. strengthens the role of the welfare state in this com/ article/2015/11/02/this-is-most-prosper- categories: 1- The factors underlying the welfare billion and is the largest fund in the world (Reed, Machinery, electronic equipment, ships and boats, regard. Promoting social democracy in the ous-nation-in-world-hint-not-us (Retrieved at: 5 state 2- Causing factors of the welfare state 3- Sta- 24 June 2014). metal products, pharmaceutical products, phar- 19th and 20th centuries has been productive November 2015). bilizers of the welfare state When it comes to the Norway is now considered one of the richest macy-set equipment, petroleum and gas products, of a structure that is called the Scandinavian 10)Grytten, Ola Honningdal. (2004a). “A underlying factors of the welfare state, we mean countries in the world, both in terms of per capita plastics and furniture and decorative products are welfare state (the three countries, Sweden, Consumer Price Index for Norway, 1516-2003.” the factors that strengthen a country’s ability to gross domestic product and in terms of capital items imported from other countries to Norway. Norway and Denmark) today. Political and (Working Paper), Norges Bank: Norwegian School create and deploy the welfare state. Two factors turnover. In terms of human development indi- Sweden has the most import to Norway. economic structural adjustment of Norway of Economics and Business Administration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Integration and the Location of Knowledge Intensive Multinational Firms
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Braunerhjelm, Pontus Working Paper Regional Integration and the Location of Knowledge-Intensive Multinational Firms: Implications for Comparative Advantage and Welfare of Outsiders and Insiders IUI Working Paper, No. 404 Provided in Cooperation with: Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm Suggested Citation: Braunerhjelm, Pontus (1993) : Regional Integration and the Location of Knowledge-Intensive Multinational Firms: Implications for Comparative Advantage and Welfare of Outsiders and Insiders, IUI Working Paper, No. 404, The Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IUI), Stockholm This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/94695 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung
    [Show full text]
  • The Keeping and Milking of Sheep in the Old Subsistence Economy of Scandinavia, Iceland and Northern Europe
    THE KEEPING AND MILKING OF SHEEP IN THE OLD SUBSISTENCE ECONOMY OF SCANDINAVIA, ICELAND AND NORTHERN EUROPE Jon Bergsftker SHEEP IN EARLY SOCIETIES Archaeologists believe that sheep are associated with the pioneer cultivators in Northern European hunting cultures, and·that as domestic animals they may be considered part of the Northern European farm from earliest times (Brondsted 195 7. I. 262). At Neolithic dwelling sites in Western Norway, sheep bones are identified with refuse from meals (Hagen 1962. 35; Myhre 1967. 33-34), whilst the use of wool for clothes is confirmed from Bronze Age finds in Scandinavia (Brondsted 1958. II. 119-120). There is also reason to believe that the milk-giving qualities of domestic animals have been known from early times. Perforated pottery vessels from both Bronze Age and Iron Age Scandinavia are thought to have been used in the production of cheese (Rank 1966. 44-47). But there is no real evidence to suggest a development from general sheep­ keeping to selective sheep-breeding in prehistoric times in Northern Europe - whether for wool or for meat. The prehistoric sheep - descendants of which, in historic times, were found in e.g. Iceland and the Farnes, in the Norwegian spael.sau or short-tailed sheep, and in the Swedish tantras (country breed)-were kept equally for their milk, wool and mutton. Non-specialised use of the sheep belongs primarily to a subsistence economy where sheep-keeping is based on an individual's personal needs rather than on a concept of produce for sale. Only gradually, as a community becomes more stratified and sections of the population find themselves without sheep, does a more deliberate policy of sheep-keeping appear, linked to commerical and economic factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Cluster in Norway
    Microeconomics of Competitiveness May 2012 Olivia Leskinen | Paul Klouman Bekken | Haja Razafinjatovo | Manuel García Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 2 1. Overview of Norway ..................................................................................................................... 3 2. Norway’s economic performance ............................................................................................ 4 Why has Norway done so well over the last twenty years? .............................................................. 5 3. Competitiveness Analysis of Norway ..................................................................................... 6 Endowments ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Competitiveness Profile and the National Diamond ........................................................................... 6 Factor Conditions: Education ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Factor Conditions: Research & Development .................................................................................................. 10 Context for Firm Strategy and Rivalry: Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) ........................................... 12 Company Operations and Strategy: The Role of
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish Business Review Vol
    Finnish Business Review Vol. 6 (2019), pp. 28-40 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Finnish Business Review . Journal homepage: www.fbr.fi . ___________________________________________________________________ Case The competitiveness of Norway and its challenges Nazar Kokaurov, corresponding author, international business student, JAMK University of Applied Sciences, School of Business, Rajakatu 35, 40200, Jyväskylä, Finland, kokaurovn99 (at) gmail.com Murat Akpinar, JAMK University of Applied Sciences, School of Business, Rajakatu 35, 40200, Jyväskylä, Finland, murat.akpinar (at) jamk.fi _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract This case addresses the competitiveness of Norway and its challenges. Thanks to the discovery of oil & gas on the Norwegian continental shelf in 1969, Norway’s economy prospered to become the sixth richest in the world in terms of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Different than other oil & gas rich countries in the world, Norway achieved to improve the societal welfare of its citizens and led the world in social progress. Despite the prosperity and the high level of social welfare, dependence on the oil & gas industry, the climate crisis, and poor transport infrastructure continued to challenge Norway, and the country lagged behind its Scandinavian neighbours in competitiveness. Keywords: competitiveness, Norway _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Norway was a developing economy at the beginning of the 20th century, but the discovery of oil & gas in the Norwegian continental shelf in 1969 changed the country’s fate, making it the sixth richest in the world in 2018 with a purchasing power parity (PPP) adjusted gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of USD 65,6031. Different than other oil & gas rich countries, but similar to other Scandinavian countries, Norway was also a leading nation in social progress with an index of 90.952 out of 100.
    [Show full text]
  • Is a Strong Indigenous Industrial Base a Necessary Condition For
    Responding to the crisis: Are policies aimed at a strong indigenous industrial base a necessary condition for sustainable economic growth? Bernadette Andreosso-O’Callaghan and Helena Lenihan1 Abstract We examine whether a strong indigenous manufacturing base is a necessary condition for sustainable economic growth in the case of two small, open economies, Ireland and Sweden. Sweden has been impacted by the economic crisis to a lesser degree than Ireland; we explore (through a manufacturing activity lens) the reasons for the asymmetric impacts and ask if the nature of the shock is related to ‘Economic Sovereignty’ and to the type of industrial policy. We argue Sweden was less affected given that its indigenous firms control the highly export-focussed and technology- based engineering sector whereas in Ireland high-technology sectors are controlled by foreign firms. In terms of policy implications, we suggest that industrial policy should aim for sustainable economic activity and growth such that industrial activity within the economy should be able to minimise the impact of asymmetric shocks such as the current global economic recession. keywords: manufacturing base; economic vulnerability; shock; economic crisis; industrial policy. 1 Department of Economics, Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, Ireland. Corresponding author. Email; [email protected] 1 Introduction High-profile Multinational Enterprise (MNE) job losses have featured regularly in the Irish news of late contributing significantly to Ireland’s unemployment rate (13.4 per cent in December 2010; CSO 2010). Such developments have put into question the sustainability of Ireland’s industrial policy which, we argue, has focused most of its efforts on FDI/MNEs to the detriment of an indigenous (largely SME) sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Swedish Approach Regarding COVID-19 Successful in the Term of Economics?
    Was Swedish approach regarding COVID-19 successful in the term of economics? 1 Abstract On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization declared that Covid-19 is a pandemic. At that time the total number of cases were 118,000 and virus was spread over 110 countries. After that a lot of European countries imposed draconian restrictions. Italy, Spain, France, the United Kingdom and other European countries believed that “Great Lockdown” and strict measures would help to prevent the spread of the virus, but unlike all these countries Sweden chose another way in response to Covid-19. Swedish authorities primarily relied on their citizens' responsibility and didn’t decide to close restaurants, schools, bars, shops and other places of peoples gathering, like the other European countries did. In this paper I can't prove or disprove was this approach successful because it is still an ongoing process and the paper is not about “how successful was Swedish strategy”, in this paper i want to examine the notion “was Swedish approach successful in terms of economics”. To do it, in the first part, I am going to discuss Swedish approach to COVID-19 and its health outcomes, in order to see the whole picture we have to analyse what really this approach means and how it has been different from other European countries approaches. Health outcomes are also very interesting factor, because a lot of scholars believe that Sweden approach failed because country has seen high mortality rate and the cost of it was “saved economics”, but we have examples of countries with draconian restrictions and at the same time with the mortality rate much more higher than Sweden has and finally with help of data, diagram and comparison with other European countries I want to check if this model has been really effective regarding economics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nordic Model and the Oil Nation Roberto Iacono
    The Nordic Model and the Oil Nation Roberto Iacono To cite this version: Roberto Iacono. The Nordic Model and the Oil Nation. 2016. hal-01402143 HAL Id: hal-01402143 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01402143 Preprint submitted on 24 Nov 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Nordic Model and the Oil Nation Roberto Iaconoy September 1, 2016 This paper investigates the long-run economic effects of large natural resource endowments, through a comparative quantitative case study. Focusing on three economic features of the so-called Nordic model, namely low income inequality, high labour productivity growth, and high welfare spending, this study estimates the shocks to these key features in Norway after the country became one of the world’slargest oil exporters. A synthetic control unit constructed by weighting Nordic countries that resemble the economy of Norway without being oil producers provides the most reliable comparison unit to estimate the causal effects constituting the paper’s threefold contribution. First, results show that the resource windfall contributed to relatively higher top income shares, adding natural resources to the set of drivers of income inequality in Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing the Efficiency of the Cooperation Between Business and Science – Moving Away from Silos Through a Mission-Orientated STI Policy
    Enhancing the efficiency of the cooperation between business and science – Moving away from silos through a mission-orientated STI policy Final Report Project funded under the call for tenders No SRSS/C2019/065 Dr Jelena Angelis Dr Lisa Cowey Dr Agnė Paliokaitė Elžbieta Jašinskaitė Alasdair Reid Kimmo Halme 17 December 2020 The project was funded by the European Union via the Structural Reform Support Programme and implemented i by EFIS Centre and Visionary Analytics in cooperation with the European Commission's Directorate General for Structural Reform Support. Table of content 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 2 Bottlenecks and drivers for business-science cooperation in Lithuania ................. 4 2.1 Strategic business-science collaboration context in Lithuania ...................................... 4 2.2 Health technologies and Biotechnologies (Life sciences) ............................................. 7 2.3 Information and Communication Technology ............................................................. 15 2.4 Engineering (focus on photonics and laser technologies) .......................................... 21 2.5 Agro-innovation and Food technologies ..................................................................... 27 2.6 Drivers and barriers for business-science collaboration in STI ................................... 33 3 Review of international experience from Ireland, Sweden and the Netherlands .. 37 3.1 Economic and innovative
    [Show full text]
  • The Swedish Innovation Strategy
    The Swedish Innovation Strategy Produced by: the Swedish Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications Illustrations: Johan Hallnäs/Svenska Grafikbyrån Photos: Elliot Elliot/Johnér, cover, Morgan Karlsson/Johnér, page 4, Kari Kohvakka/Johnér, page 8, Plattform/Johnér, page 12, Mats Hallgren/Johnér, page 18, Lina Karna Kippel/Johnér, page 20, Susanne Kronholm/Johnér, page 50 Printed by: Åtta 45 Art. no.: N2012.33 Foreword Innovation begins with the human being. Human beings have ideas and develop know- ledge. Human beings use their knowledge, skills and experience in new solutions in their businesses, in their workplaces, in their spare time or as consumers. Sweden’s innovation capacity is essential to meet the challenges and opportunities of the global economy. Policy must therefore be based on a holistic view of how Sweden’s innova- tion capacity can be maintained and strengthened over time. This is the starting point for the Government’s national innovation strategy. The world today is undergoing fundamental changes. Many countries in the EU and the OECD, as well as emerging countries such as China, India, Russia and Brazil, have an increased focus on developing the innovation climate of their countries. Sweden stands relatively strong in most international comparisons of countries’ innovation capacities and competitiveness. However, global competition is increasing between companies and nations. The rising pressure on the earth’s resources also requires new solutions that combine ecological, social and economic sustainability. In Sweden, we need to be more innovative to meet the global societal challenges, to increase the competitiveness and to renew the future welfare and public services.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Institutions and Policy in Knowledge Sector Development: an Assessment of the Danish and Norwegian Information Communication Technology Sectors
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2015 The Role of Institutions and Policy in Knowledge Sector Development: An Assessment of the Danish and Norwegian Information Communication Technology Sectors Keith M. Gehring University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Gehring, Keith M., "The Role of Institutions and Policy in Knowledge Sector Development: An Assessment of the Danish and Norwegian Information Communication Technology Sectors" (2015). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1086. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/1086 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS AND POLICY IN KNOWLEDGE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE DANISH AND NORWEGIAN INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY SECTORS __________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy __________ by Keith M. Gehring November 2015 Advisor: Professor Martin Rhodes Author: Keith M. Gehring Title: THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS AND POLICY IN KNOWLEDGE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE DANISH AND NORWEGIAN INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY SECTORS Advisor: Professor Martin Rhodes Degree Date: November 2015 ABSTRACT The Nordic economies of Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden outperform on average nearly ever OECD country in the share of value added stemming from the information and communication technology (ICT) sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation of the Polish Economy in Comparison with the EU Member States
    www.ees.uni.opole.pl ISSN paper version 1642-2597 ISSN electronic version 2081-8319 Economic and Environmental Studies Vol. 18, No 2 (46/2018), 971-993, June 2018 Innovation of the Polish economy in comparison with the EU member states Magdalena WĘGLARZ Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland Abstract: In the paper, the change in the innovation level of the Polish economy over the years 2007-2016 will be presented and a comparison of the innovation level between the Polish economy and those of the EU member states over the years 2010-2016 will be made. The aim of the paper is to find the answer to the question what the reason of the relatively low innovation level of the Polish economy is in comparison with other countries. In 2016, the Polish economy took the fourth place from the last among all the EU member states, reaching the innovation level of less than 55% relative to that of the EU in 2010. In the first part, a measurement of innovation of the Polish economy will be presented. The measurement will use indicators that were described in three different reports of the Central Statistical Office. In the next part, the innovation level of all the EU member states will be described and the innovation level of the Polish economy will be compared with the innovation level of the EU member states’ economies, such as: Sweden (SE), the Czech republic (CZ), Slovenia (SI) Lithuania (LT) and the European Union. The analysis will be made on the basis of data from European Innovation Scoreboard 2017 (EIS).
    [Show full text]
  • Internationalization of Innovative Activities in Norway US Patents Involving Norwegian Inventors and Assignees
    ARBEIDSNOTAT 01/18 WORKING PAPER In this working paper we aim to investigate the international pattern of innovation in Norway as it is revealed in patent data from the United States Patent and Trademark Internationalization of innovative Office (USPTO). The empirical section consists of four parts. We start by considering innovative activities in Norway in an international perspective, and continue by focusing activities in Norway on the growth in patents and their international connectedness as far as US patents involving actors residing in Norway are concerned. Then we investigate the development US patents involving Norwegian concerning the international dispersion of co-inventors in these patents and the distri- bution of co-inventors across countries. Finally, focus is on the top patenting firms in inventors and assignees Norway and the international dispersion of co-inventors in their US patents. Xinlu Qiu Per Heum Xiaomei Cheng Samfunns- og næringslivsforskning AS Centre for Applied Research at NHH Helleveien 30 NO-5045 Bergen Norway P +47 55 95 95 00 E [email protected] W snf.no Samfunns- og næringslivsforskning AS Centre for Applied Research at NHH Trykk: Allkopi Bergen SNF SAMFUNNS- OG NÆRINGSLIVSFORSKNING AS - er et selskap i NHH-miljøet med oppgave å initiere, organisere og utføre ekstern- finansiert forskning. Norges Handelshøyskole og Stiftelsen SNF er aksjonærer. Virksomheten drives med basis i egen stab og fagmiljøene ved NHH. SNF er ett av Norges ledende forskningsmiljø innen anvendt økonomisk-administrativ forskning, og har gode samarbeidsrelasjoner til andre forskningsmiljøer i Norge og utlandet. SNF utfører forskning og forsknings baserte utredninger for sentrale beslutningstakere i privat og offentlig sektor.
    [Show full text]