DOCSLIB.ORG

Eastern Washington Partnership Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eastern Washington Partnership Plan EASTERN WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP REGIONAL/LOCAL WORKFORCE PLAN PROGRAM YEARS 2016-2020 For the implementation of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Adopted May 31, 2016 By the Workforce Development Council Workforce Development Area 10 1 Contents PROLOGUE / INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 4 Board Structure ........................................................................................................................... 5 PLAN GUIDELINES SECTION I ............................................................................................. 6 REGIONAL DESIGNATION .................................................................................................... 6 PLAN GUIDELINES SECTION II .............................................................................................. 7 VISION AND GOALS ............................................................................................................... 7 REGIONAL ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 12 Economy ............................................................................................................................... 13 Demographics and the Workforce ........................................................................................ 16 Employment and Unemployment ......................................................................................... 24 Education of the Workforce .................................................................................................. 27 Knowledge and skills needed to meet employment needs .................................................... 31 Workforce Development Activities ...................................................................................... 31 Services, Service Providers and Partnerships ....................................................................... 33 Primary WIOA Service Providers ........................................................................................ 36 Coordination of Transportation and/or Other Support Services, as Appropriate. ................ 37 Cross-Regional Cost Arrangements, as Appropriate. ........................................................... 37 Regional performance negotiation and evaluation ............................................................... 38 CROSS REGIONAL PARTNERS ........................................................................................... 38 Performance .......................................................................................................................... 40 Cross-Regional Strategies ..................................................................................................... 40 Cross-Regional Goals, Achievements and Course Corrections ............................................ 40 Funding ................................................................................................................................. 41 Evaluation of Partnership ...................................................................................................... 41 PLAN GUIDELINES SECTION III ......................................................................................... 42 LWDB COMPONENT OF PLAN ........................................................................................... 42 Board Performance ............................................................................................................... 42 Board Resource Strategy....................................................................................................... 42 Core Programs ...................................................................................................................... 44 Program Outreach ................................................................................................................. 44 Coordination of Workforce Investment and Education ........................................................ 45 Career Pathways.................................................................................................................... 46 Employer Services ................................................................................................................ 46 Quality Improvement ............................................................................................................ 46 2 Technology ........................................................................................................................... 47 Equal Opportunity and ADA ................................................................................................ 47 Type and availability of adult and dislocated worker employment and training activities .. 47 Rapid Response ..................................................................................................................... 47 Transportation ....................................................................................................................... 48 Coordination of Services....................................................................................................... 48 Individuals with Disabilities ................................................................................................. 49 Sub-grants and Contracts ...................................................................................................... 50 Technology-enabled intake and Case Management ............................................................. 51 PLAN GUIDELINES SECTION IV ......................................................................................... 53 Performance Accountability ..................................................................................................... 53 Attachments .................................................................................................................................. 55 County Profiles ............................................................................................................................. 70 Asotin County ........................................................................................................................... 71 Columbia County ...................................................................................................................... 73 Ferry County ............................................................................................................................. 74 Garfield County ........................................................................................................................ 76 Lincoln County ......................................................................................................................... 77 Pend Oreille County .................................................................................................................. 79 Stevens County ......................................................................................................................... 81 Walla Walla County .................................................................................................................. 83 Whitman County ....................................................................................................................... 85 County and WDC Summary ......................................................................................................... 87 Planning Process ........................................................................................................................... 91 3 PROLOGUE / INTRODUCTION The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014 amends and reauthorizes the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, supporting the nation’s and local employment services, workforce development, adult education, and vocational rehabilitation activities. The bill also reauthorizes and enhances the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act and amends the Wagner-Peyser Act of 1933. Activities within the workforce development system will be guided by and responsive to local economic and employment needs. The Workforce Development Council is given authority and responsibility to provide direction to service providers and partners that assist customers in obtaining training and employment. This plan will provide a roadmap for the Eastern Washington Partnership Workforce Development Council to craft policies and inform funding decisions affecting workforce development activities. Workforce Development Area 10 is comprised of nine counties in Washington, including Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Garfield, Lincoln, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Walla Walla and Whitman. These counties are located on the extreme eastern border of the state, reaching from Canada to Oregon along the Idaho border. The northern counties are mountainous and timbered. The central and southern counties are primarily agricultural. The area is over 14,000 square miles in size, approximately 21% of the state, yet only 3% of the state’s population resides there. The WDA’s diversity, in terms of its geography, resources and demographics make it unique among other workforce areas in the country. Within the area there are sub-regions with distinctly individual identities, different natural resources and singular economies. Each sub- region has some of its own key industries with discrete workforce training needs. Labor markets vary within the area and are determined by resources
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Power System
    HISTORY AND CURRENT STATUS OF THE ELECTRICITY INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Kevin Schneider Ph.D., P.E. Chair, Seattle Chapter of the IEEE PES IEEE PES SCHOLARSHIP PLUS INITIATIVE 2 Washington State PES Scholars • Patrick Berg, Seattle University • Parichehr Karimi, University of • Zachary Burrows, Eastern Washington Washington UiUnivers ity • TiTravis Kinney, WhitWashington Sta te UiUnivers ity • Erin Clement, University of Washington • Allan Koski, Eastern Washington University • Anastasia Corman, University of • Kyle Lindgren, University of Washington, Washington • John Martinsen, Washington State • Gwendolyn Crabtree, Washington State University University • Melissa Martinsen, University of • David Dearing, Washington State Washington University • JthJonathan NhiNyhuis, SttlSeattle PifiPacific UiUnivers ity • Terra Donley, Gonzaga University Derek Jared Pisinger, Washington State Gowrylow, Seattle University University • Sanel Hirkic, Washington State University • Douglas Rapier, Washington State • Nathan Hirsch, Eastern Washington University University • Chris Rusnak, Washington State University • John Hofman, Washington State • Kaiwen Sun, University of Washington University • Joshua Wu, Seattle University • • Tracy Yuan, University of Washington 3 OVERVIEW Part 1: The Current Status of the Electricity Infrastructure in the Pacific North west Part 2: How the Current System Evolved Over Time Part 3: Current Challenges and the Path Forward Part 4: Concluding Comments PART 1:: THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE ELECTRICITY INFRASTRUCTURE
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Grain Train
    How does the Washington Grain Train generate revenues? Washington Usage fees for grain cars are generated on the BNSF Railroad based on a combination of mileage traveled and number of days on that railroad (time and mileage). The further the car travels Grain Train and the longer it is on a particular railroad, the more money the car earns. The shuttle service between grain elevators and the barge terminal in Wallula use a different system. A car use fee per trip was June 2011 established for the shuttle service based on estimates of time and mileage. One car use fee was established for shipments on the PV Hooper rail line, and another for the BLMR. These fees are deposited directly into accounts managed by each of the three Grain Train Revolving Fund (Washington State-Owned Cars) port districts. These funds are used for grain car maintenance, car tracking, and Dollars in millions eventual car replacement (based on a 20- $1.4 year depreciation schedule). A portion of $1.2 these fees are also set aside and used as $1.0 a “reserve” fund that is periodically tapped for fleet expansion. $0.8 Once the reserve fund has grown large $0.6 enough to purchase rail cars and there is $0.4 a demonstrated need for additional cars, WSDOT can instruct the port districts to $0.2 send funds to a rail car sales firm selected $0 by WSDOT. This firm then delivers the cars 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 to Washington for rehabilitation and then Twenty nine additional grain hopper rail cars were purchased in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 26 Trails in Grant County 2020
    and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units For more information, please contact: Grant County Tourism Commission P.O. Box 37, Ephrata, WA 98823 509.765.7888 • 800.992.6234 In Grant County, Washington TourGrantCounty.com TOP TRAILS Grant County has some of the most scenic and pristine vistas, hiking trails and outdoor 26 recreational opportunities in Washington State. and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units Grant County is known for its varied landscapes on a high desert plateau with coulees, lakes, in Grant County Washington reservoirs, sand dunes, canals, rivers, creeks, and other waterways. These diverse ecosystems Grant County Tourism Commission For Additional copies please contact: support a remarkable variety of fish and PO Box 37 Jerry T. Gingrich wildlife species that contribute to the economic, Ephrata, Washington 98837 Grant County Tourism Commission recreational and cultural life of the County. www.tourgrantcounty.com Grant County Courthouse PO Box 37 Ephrata, WA 98837 No part of this book may be reproduced in (509) 754-2011, Ext. 2931 any form, or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, without permission in For more information on writing from the Grant County Tourism Grant County accommodations Commission. www.tourgrantcounty.com © 2019, Grant County Tourism Commission Second printing, 10m Trails copy and photographs Book, map and cover design by: provided by: Denise Adam Graphic Design Cameron Smith, Lisa Laughlin, J. Kemble, Veradale, WA 99037 Shawn Cardwell, Mark Amara, (509) 891-0873 Emry Dinman, Harley Price, [email protected] Sebastian Moraga and Madison White Printed by: Rewriting and editing by: Mark Amara Pressworks 2717 N. Perry Street Watchable Wildlife copy and Spokane, Washington 99207 photographs provided by: (509) 462-7627 Washington Department of [email protected] Fish and Wildlife Photograph by Lisa Laughlin CONTENTS CONTENTS Grant County Trails and Hiking Grant County Watchable Wildlife Viewing Upper Grand Coulee Area 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Data Compilation
    APPENDIX A DATA COMPILATION Table of Contents A-1 Bibliography A-2 Non-GIS Data Directory A-3 GIS Data Directory APPENDIX A-1 BIBLIOGRAPHY Spokane Watershed Bibliography Appendix A1 1. Adema, G. W. Bedrock Depth and Morphology of the Rathdrum Prairie, Idaho: University of Idaho; c1999. 67 pages. Notes: Master of Science Thesis 2. Adema, G. W.; K.F.Sprenke., and R.M. Breckenridge. Bed Morphology of the Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer from a Detailed Gravity Survey [abstract]. Geological Society of America. 1998; 30(6). 3. Ader, M. J. Hydrogeology of the Green Bluff Plateau Spokane County. Washington State Department of Ecology, Shorelands and Water Resources Program; 1996; Open File Technical Information Report 96-03. 27 pages. 4. Allen, D. R. Latah Creek, Washington, Watershed: 1995-1996 Water Year Water Quality Assessment [abstract]. Inland Northwest Water Resources Conference, Program and Abstracts; 1997. 5. Amerigian, C.; J. Toth, and S.P. Reidel. Paleomagnetism of the Columbia River Basalt Group [abstract]. Geological Society of America Abstracts With Programs. 1987; 19(6):354. 6. Ames, K. C.; N.P. Matson.; D.M. Suzuki., and P.B. Sak. Inventory, Characterization, and Water Quality of Springs, Seeps, and Streams near Midnite Mine, Stevens County, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey; 1996; U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-115. 53 pages. 7. Anderson, A. M.; K. Bloudek.; P.O. Hyde; O. O'Connor, and N. Ogren. Evaluation of Urban Runoff Treatment in Swales. Spokane, Washington: Gonzaga University, School of Engineering, Center for Engineering Design; 1996; Senior Design Project 95-5. 44 pages. 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Resource Statistics for Eastern Washington
    EDITORS FILE COPY Agriculture Timber Resource Forest Setvice Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Statistics for Eastern Experiment Station Resource Bulletin PNW-104 washington September 1983 Patricia M. Bassett and Daniel D. Oswald Authors PATRICIA M. BASSEll is a computer programer analyst and DANIEL D. OSWALD is a resource analyst at the Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, P.O. Box 3890, Portland, Oregon 97208. Abstract Summary Preface Bassett, Patricia M.; Oswald, Daniel D. The eastern Washington resource area Forest Inventory and Analysis (formerly Timber resource statistics for eastern totals 26,966,000 acres (10 913 000 ha), Forest Survey) is a nationwide project of Washington. Resour. Bull. PNW-104. of which an estimated 9,216,000 acres the USDA Forest Service authorized by Portland, OR: U.S. Department of (3 730 000 ha) are forested. An estimated the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific 7,145,000 acres (2 891 000 ha) are Resources Research Act of 1978. Work Northwest Forest and Range Experi- classified as timberland. The area has an units of the project, located at Forest ment Station; 1983.32 p. estimated 17.3 billion cubic feet Service Experiment Stations, conduct (491 million m3) of standing timber with forest resource inventories throughout This report summarizes a 1980 timber 72 percent of this volume in public the 50 States. The Pacific Northwest resource inventory of the 16 forested ownership. Forest and Range Experiment Station at counties in Washington east of the crest Portland, Oregon, is responsible for of the Cascade Range. Detailed tables of inventories in Alaska, California, Hawaii, forest area, timber volume, growth, Oregon, and Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting the Vision for Gorge Future Public, Governors, Senators, Voice Support for Funding Gorge Protection at Gorge Forum
    FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE Setting the Vision for Gorge Future Public, Governors, Senators, Voice Support for Funding Gorge Protection at Gorge Forum On April21, Congressman Earl Blumenauer sponsored the Columbia River Gorge Forum, hosted by McMenamins Edgefield. A standing­ room-only crowd heard panels discuss issues and opportunities for economic development and recreation in the Gorge. Representatives from the offices of Governor Kitzhaber, Governor Locke, Senator Ron Wyden, and Senator Patty Murray spoke in support of funding Gorge protection through the Columbia Gorge Commission. Repre­ sentative Marc Boldt from Washington, who has led the attack on the Gorge protection budget, spoke briefly. Representatives Val Ogden from Washington and Chris Beck from Oregon spoke in support of full funding for Gorge protection. More than 20 people testified during public comment. The overwhelming majority of people supported Gorge protection, and several people raised "Those who seek to slash funding for concerns that the Act is not strong the Gorge Commission and reduce its enough. Two representatives of effectiveness have severely misjudged Skamania continued on page 5 the mood of the public. The passion This 1994 photo (left) shows urban growth in and commitment to prated and Troutdale, Oregon, outside the western enhance the Gorge was clearly evident boundary of the National Scenic Area, and rural-scale development and farmlands within at the April 21 forum. I intend to build the Scenic Area east of the Sandy River. on that support and enthusiasm in the Cutting Gorge protection in this time of explosive population growth and develop­ months ahead." Congressman Earl Blumenauer ment will put the Gorge at great risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Colleges & Universities
    WASHINGTON STATE COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES • Links to Washington State Colleges & Universities WASHINGTON STATE COLLEGES UNIVERSITIES WEBSITE LINK ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY-SEATTLE . www.antiochseattle.edu BASTYR UNIVERSITY-KENMORE . www.bastyr.edu CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY . www.cwu.edu CITY UNIVERSITY . www.cityu.edu EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY . www.ewu.edu EVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE. www.evergreen.edu GONZAGA UNIVERSITY . www.gonzaga.edu PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY. www.plu.edu ST. MARTIN COLLEGE . www.stmartin.edu SEATTLE CENTRAL COLLEGE . www.seattlecentral.edu SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY . www.spu.edu SEATTLE UNIVERSITY . www.seattleu.edu UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON . www.washington.edu UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND. www.pugetsound.edu WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY . www.wallawalla.edu WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY . www.wsu.edu WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY . www.wgu.edu WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY-TRI-CITIES . www.tricity.wsu.edu WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY-VANCOUVER . www.vancouver.wsu.edu WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY . www.wwu.edu WHITMAN COLLEGE . www.whitman.edu WHITWORTH COLLEGE . www.whitworth.edu COMMUNITY COLLEGES & TECHNICAL SCHOOLS BATES TECHNICAL . www.bates.ctc.edu BELLEVUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE . www.bellevuecollege.edu BELLINGHAM TECHNICAL COLLEGE . www.btc.ctc.edu BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE . www.bigbend.edu CASCADIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE . www.cascadia.edu CENTRAL SEATTLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE . www.seattlecentral.edu CENTRALIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE . www.centralia.edu CLARK COMMUNITY COLLEGE . www.clark.edu CLOVER PARK TECHNICAL . www.cptc.edu COMMUNITY COLLEGES & TECHNICAL SCHOOLS (cont.) COLUMBIA COLLEGE . www.ccis.edu COLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE . www.columbiabasin.edu EDMONDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE. www.edcc.edu EVERETT COMMUNITY COLLEGE . www.everettcc.edu GRAYS HARBOR COLLEGE . www.ghc.edu GREEN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE . www.greenriver.edu HIGHLINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE . www.highline.edu LAKE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY .
    [Show full text]
  • The Columbia River Gorge: Its Geologic History Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway by IRA A
    VOLUMB 2 NUMBBI3 NOVBMBBR, 1916 . THE .MINERAL · RESOURCES OF OREGON ' PuLhaLed Monthly By The Oregon Bureau of Mines and Geology Mitchell Point tunnel and viaduct, Columbia River Hi~hway The .. Asenstrasse'' of America The Columbia River Gorge: its Geologic History Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway By IRA A. WILLIAMS 130 Pages 77 Illustrations Entered aa oeoond cl,... matter at Corvallis, Ore., on Feb. 10, l9lt, accordintt to tbe Act or Auc. :U, 1912. .,.,._ ;t ' OREGON BUREAU OF MINES AND GEOLOGY COMMISSION On1cm or THm Co><M188ION AND ExmBIT OREGON BUILDING, PORTLAND, OREGON Orncm or TBm DtBIICTOR CORVALLIS, OREGON .,~ 1 AMDJ WITHY COMBE, Governor HENDY M. PABKB, Director C OMMISSION ABTBUB M. SWARTLEY, Mining Engineer H. N. LAWRill:, Port.land IRA A. WILLIAMS, Geologist W. C. FELLOWS, Sumpter 1. F . REDDY, Grants Pass 1. L. WooD. Albany R. M. BIITT8, Cornucopia P. L. CAI<PBELL, Eugene W 1. KEBR. Corvallis ........ Volume 2 Number 3 ~f. November Issue {...j .· -~ of the MINERAL RESOURCES OF OREGON Published by The Oregon Bureau of Mines and Geology ~•, ;: · CONTAINING The Columbia River Gorge: its Geologic History l Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway t. By IRA A. WILLIAMS 130 Pages 77 Illustrations 1916 ILLUSTRATIONS Mitchell Point t unnel and v iaduct Beacon Rock from Columbia River (photo by Gifford & Prentiss) front cover Highway .. 72 Geologic map of Columbia river gorge. 3 Beacon Rock, near view . ....... 73 East P ortland and Mt. Hood . 1 3 Mt. Hamilton and Table mountain .. 75 Inclined volcanic ejecta, Mt. Tabor. 19 Eagle creek tuff-conglomerate west of Lava cliff along Sandy river.
    [Show full text]
  • Beacon Community of the Inland Northwest (Spokane, WA)
    Beacon Community of the Inland Northwest (Spokane, WA) Overview and Goals The Beacon Community of the Inland Northwest (BCIN) is one of 17 Beacon Communities building and strengthening local health IT infrastructure and testing innovative approaches to make measurable improvements in health, care and cost. Meaningful Use of electronic health records (EHR) is the foundation of the exciting work in each community. Funded by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, BCIN focuses on clinical practice transformation through a robust technology framework, clinical decision support tools, and care coordination to improve care for patients with type 2 diabetes in eastern Washington and north Idaho, the hospital referral region around Spokane, Washington. Patients in this largely rural region receive care at many different locations and from many different providers. BCIN is focused on: Improving regional outcomes for the type 2 diabetes population by integrating and coordinating care across clinical settings Implementing a comprehensive, regional approach to disease management, with standardized metrics and evidence-based clinical decision support tools Achieving optimal outcomes by leveraging IT applications that support information exchange, patient referrals, and coordinated care for patients with type 2 diabetes across a large geographical area Implementing a sustainable reimbursement model, linked in part to programs that reward community-level performance Partners BCIN’s major partners include: Community Choice, Eastern Washington Critical Access Hospital Network, Washington State Department of Health, and the Washington Academy of Family Physicians. Last Update: October 25, 2012 1 Beacon Community of the Inland Northwest Background “Beacon Community of Inland Northwest has provided us the ability to keep our Total grant award $15,702,479 over 3 years primary care physicians involved in the Lead grantee Inland Northwest Health overall care, and that provides better Services care-more coordinated care.
    [Show full text]
  • The "Palouse Soil" Problem with an Account of Elephant Remains in Wind-Borne Soil on the Columbia Plateau of Washington
    THE "PALOUSE SOIL" PROBLEM WITH AN ACCOUNT OF ELEPHANT REMAINS IN WIND-BORNE SOIL ON THE COLUMBIA PLATEAU OF WASHINGTON By KIRK BRYAN INTRODUCTION Wheat is the great crop of eastern Washington. Grown on an extensive scale with all the ingenuity of modern labor-saving devices, it forms the basis for the stable prosperity of the " Inland Empire " which has its commercial center at Spokane. Deep, rich soil is the controlling factor in the growth of wheat in this area, for the rain­ fall is light, though advantageously concentrated in the winter sea­ son. The system of summer fallow is necessary to conserve the mois­ ture of one season into the next, but thereby one-half the land lies plowed and idle. The wheat region, therefore, is a checkerboard of bare brown rectangles of plowed land alternating with rectangles of wheat that are green, gold, or buff according to the season. The great Columbia Plateau, underlain except in a few small areas by basalt flows several hundred feet thick, has nearly every­ where a mantle of so-called soil, deep and retentive of moisture, the basis of this great wheat growing industry. This " soil" * is a fine­ grained mass that is intimately dissected into hills and valleys. (PI. 4, A and B.) The little valleys are usually cut to or just below the level of the underlying basalt, so that the height of the hills, from 100 to 150 feet, measures the thickness of this " soil." This material is locally known as " Palouse soil," from the rich wheat-growing area along Palouse Kiver south of Spokane, which is popularly known as the " Palouse country." The Bureau of Soils, as shown in the summary of the history of the subject, on pages 22-26, recognizes in the region a number of soil series, only, one of which bears the name Palouse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Landscape of the Columbia River Gorge
    The Evolving Landscape of the Columbia River Gorge Jim E. O’Connor Carleton Watkins, photographer, OHS neg., OrHi A reprint from the Oregon Historical Quarterly Special Issue Dissecting the Columbia: Lewis and Clark West of the Divide William L. Lang, guest editor Volume , Number Fall the journal of record for oregon history Jim E. O’Connor The Evolving Landscape of the Columbia River Gorge Lewis and Clark and Cataclysms on the Columbia ravelers retracing lewis and clark’s journey to the Pacific over the past two hundred years have witnessed tre- mendous change to the Columbia River Gorge and its pri- mary feature, the Columbia River. Dams, reservoirs, timber Tharvest, altered fisheries, transportation infrastructure, and growth and shrinkage of communities have transformed the river and valley. This radically different geography of human use and habitation is commonly contrasted with the sometimes romantic view of a prior time provided both by early nineteenth-century chroniclers and present-day critics of the modern condition — an ecotopia of plentiful and perpetual resources sustaining a stable culture from time immemorial. Reality is more com- plicated. Certainly the human-caused changes to the Columbia River and the gorge since Lewis and Clark have been profound; but the geologic his- tory of immense floods, landslides, and volcanic eruptions that occurred before their journey had equally, if not more, acute effects on landscapes and societies of the gorge. In many ways, the Lewis and Clark Expedi- tion can be viewed as a hinge point for the Columbia River, the changes engineered to the river and its valley in the two hundred years since their visit mirrored by tremendous changes geologically engendered in the thousands of years before.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Community Vulnerability Profile May 2020
    Regional Community Vulnerability Profile May 2020 1. OVERVIEW During disasters, populations with higher levels of vulnerability are more likely to be impacted. Understanding a community’s demographic and socioeconomic profile can help emergency managers better prepare for and respond to hazard events by identifying areas with higher vulnerabilities and higher rates of access and functional needs. Examples of using this information include identifying areas with marginalized and underserved population groups in the region; identifying areas in need of emergency shelters and resources; understanding the disproportionate impacts a community may be faced with; identifying communities that will need continued support to recover after an emergency or natural disaster; and helping allocate emergency preparedness funding based on community need. This analysis can also deepen the understanding of health and social inequities in the community. It can help address equity implications that may arise during an emergency or disaster to better serve the needs of those most marginalized. This profile provides an overview of the regional community vulnerabilities for the 19 counties and four Tribes that make up the Washington State Regional Emergency Disaster Healthcare Coalition (REDi HCC). It utilizes five-year estimates provided by the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2014-2018 American Community Survey. The profile focuses on at-risk populations and vulnerability indicators. Data is provided for the Eastern Washington region, with county specific data at the end of the document. A list of additional resources is also included. Social Vulnerability Indicators To help identify vulnerable populations and at- risk individuals, the Center for Disease Control developed the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI).
    [Show full text]