DOCSLIB.ORG

Belgium Joost Verlinden

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Belgium Joost Verlinden Belgium Joost Verlinden Linklaters LLP Olivier van der Haegen 1 Arbitration Agreements 2 Governing Legislation 1.1 What, if any, are the legal requirements of an 2.1 What legislation governs the enforcement of arbitration agreement under the laws of Belgium? arbitration proceedings in Belgium? There are no formal requirements for an arbitration agreement to The provisions governing arbitration are incorporated in the Belgian be valid. Arbitration agreements can, for instance, result from an Code of Civil Procedure (Articles 1676–1722 CCP). exchange of faxes or letters. They can also be included in general conditions, but it must be clear from the circumstances that the 2.2 Does the same arbitration law govern both domestic general conditions were accepted by the other party. An oral and international arbitration proceedings? If not, how arbitration agreement is perfectly valid but if one of the parties do they differ? denies the existence of such an agreement, the other party will have to prove the intention of the parties to submit the dispute to Yes, the same provisions govern both domestic and international arbitration, which will usually require at least some sort of written arbitration proceedings. proof. However, in arbitrations in which all parties are non-Belgian, the Moreover, the arbitration agreement will only be binding if the parties can waive their right to initiate proceedings to set aside the substantial conditions for the validity of an agreement are met, award (Article 1718 CCP). such as the capacity of the parties and their valid consent to the Also, while the absence of reasoning in the award will be considered agreement. a ground to set aside or to refuse enforcement of the award rendered in Belgium (Articles 1713.4, 1717.3 and 1721.1 CCP), this ground 1.2 What other elements ought to be incorporated in an cannot be invoked to oppose enforcement of an award rendered in arbitration agreement? a foreign country where awards without reasoning are permitted (Article 1721.1 CCP). Although not required by law, it is a good idea to include the institution (if any), the method of appointment of the arbitrators, 2.3 Is the law governing international arbitration based the number of arbitrators, the language and seat of the arbitration, as on the UNCITRAL Model Law? Are there significant well as a choice of law clause. differences between the two? In the event that the parties did not incorporate these elements in their arbitration agreement, they can fall back on the Belgian Code The current Belgian arbitration law – adopted on 24 June 2013, of Civil Procedure (hereinafter, the “CCP”) which provides for which entered into force on 1 September 2013 and which is default rules on the conduct of the arbitration procedure. incorporated in the CPP – is largely based on and consistent with the UNCITRAL Model Law. The Belgian law transposed some of the 1.3 What has been the approach of the national courts to major improvements of the 2006 version of the UNCITRAL Model the enforcement of arbitration agreements? Law on interim and conservatory measures ordered by arbitral tribunals and the limited grounds for setting aside arbitral awards. As indicated under question 1.1, there are no formal requirements There are still some minor differences between the Belgian law for an arbitration agreement to be valid. and the UNCITRAL Model Law, the most important ones being The courts will, however, refuse the enforcement of an arbitration the exclusion of ex parte interim/conservatory measures, the agreement on limited grounds, e.g. if the arbitration agreement impossibility for the tribunal to amend, suspend or terminate such is invalid or terminated, was entered into by parties which had interim measures ex officio, the fact that parties in an arbitration no capacity to do so, relates to a type of dispute which is by sited in Belgium cannot agree that the award would not contain law considered to fall outside the scope of arbitration (“non- any reasoning, and the fact that both the absence of reasons and arbitrability”) or if the agreement would be contrary to public policy. the existence of fraud are additional grounds to set aside an award rendered in Belgium. 120 WWW.ICLG.CO.UK ICLG TO: INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION Linklaters LLP Belgium 2.4 To what extent are there mandatory rules governing 3.2 Is an arbitrator permitted to rule on the question of his international arbitration proceedings sited in or her own jurisdiction? Belgium? Yes, the arbitral tribunal can rule on the question of its own Although the Belgian arbitration law provides a flexible framework jurisdiction, which also includes the competence to rule on the for conducting arbitration in Belgium, there are nevertheless some validity of the arbitration agreement (Article 1690.1 CCP). A mandatory provisions with which the parties to an arbitration plea that the arbitral tribunal does not have jurisdiction must be procedure with seat in Belgium would have to abide. These include raised in the first written submission in the arbitration. A party is the following: not precluded from raising such a plea by the mere fact that it has ■ the arbitration agreement and the applicable procedural appointed an arbitrator (Article 1690.2 CCP). rules cannot breach the principle of equal treatment between Article 1690.1 CCP also stipulates that an arbitration agreement parties and adversarial proceedings (Article 1699 CCP); contained in a contract which is found null and void does not ■ arbitrators must be independent, impartial and uneven in automatically become null itself (severability). number; and ■ the arbitral award must be in writing, reasoned and signed 3.3 What is the approach of the national courts in by a majority of arbitrator(s), although only the absence of Belgium towards a party who commences court reasons can constitute a valid ground to set aside the award. proceedings in apparent breach of an arbitration agreement? 3 Jurisdiction The national courts will decline to hear a case brought in breach of an arbitration agreement, provided that the other party invokes the 3.1 Are there any subject matters that may not be referred existence of a valid arbitration agreement in limine litis, i.e. before to arbitration under the governing law of Belgium? asserting any other defence (Article 1682.1 CCP). What is the general approach used in determining Even if a party seizes a court to oppose the jurisdiction of an arbitral whether or not a dispute is “arbitrable”? tribunal, the arbitral tribunal can proceed and hear the case (Article 1682.2 CCP). In principle, all claims of a pecuniary nature can be submitted to arbitration, as well as non-pecuniary claims on which parties are allowed to enter into a settlement agreement (Article 1676.1 CCP). 3.4 Under what circumstances can a court address the issue of the jurisdiction and competence of the However, the following disputes cannot be subject to arbitration national arbitral tribunal? What is the standard of (despite the fact that they are of a pecuniary nature or can be the review in respect of a tribunal’s decision as to its own subject of a settlement agreement) or can only be under certain jurisdiction? conditions: ■ Certain matters that fall within the jurisdiction of the labour The general rule is that the arbitral tribunal has the power to decide courts, such as those relating to employment contracts, on its own jurisdiction. Therefore, if a party brings a dispute that is cannot be subject to an arbitration agreement entered into subject to a valid arbitration agreement before the courts, the courts prior to the dispute (Article 1676.5 CCP). The same is true will decline jurisdiction at the request of a party that invokes the for disputes relating to certain insurance contracts. In both arbitration agreement (see question 3.3). cases, the parties cannot agree to submit future disputes to arbitration. However, once a dispute has arisen, they may Yet, if the arbitral tribunal decides that it has jurisdiction, this validly decide to subject it to arbitration. decision can be challenged before the national courts in proceedings to set aside the arbitral award. This challenge can only be made ■ There is a long-standing controversy over the arbitrability of disputes relating to the termination of exclusive at the end of the arbitral proceedings. By contrast, if the arbitral distributorship agreements of an indefinite duration that tribunal decides that it does not have jurisdiction over the dispute, cover all or part of the Belgian territory. As a general rule, this decision can immediately be challenged before the national an arbitration clause in such agreement will only be valid and courts (Article 1690.4 CCP). enforced if the arbitrators are contractually bound to apply The national courts can also address the issue of jurisdiction of the Belgian law. arbitral tribunal in the framework of opposition proceedings against ■ There are some limited exceptions to the general rule of an exequatur order (Article 1721.1 CCP) arbitrability for certain intellectual property disputes. The national courts will exercise full jurisdiction when reviewing ■ In the field of consumer disputes, the European Court of the issue of the tribunal’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, courts are not Justice has decided that an arbitration agreement may be bound by the decision of the arbitral tribunal in that respect. considered abusive (see e.g. ECJ 26 October 2006, Case C-168/05, Elisa Maria Mostaza Claro v. Centro Movil Milenium SL). 3.5 Under what, if any, circumstances does the national ■ Public law entities may only enter into an arbitration law of Belgium allow an arbitral tribunal to assume agreement if the purpose thereof is to resolve disputes jurisdiction over individuals or entities which are not relating to an agreement that pertains to matters defined by themselves party to an agreement to arbitrate? law or royal decree (Article 1676.3 CCP).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Law on the Legal Status and Supervision of Credit Institutions and Stockbroking Firms
    06.2017 25 APRIL 2014. - Law on the legal status and supervision of credit institutions and stockbroking firms DISCLAIMER THIS TEXT IS AN UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION AND MAY NOT BE USED AS A BASIS FOR SOLVING ANY DISPUTE (Belgisch Staatsblad/Moniteur belge [Belgian Official Gazette], 7 September 2014) (Unofficial consolidated text) Last update: Law of 25 October 2016 (Belgian Official Gazette, 21 November 2016) and Law of 7 December 2016 (Belgian Official Gazette, 13 December 2016) BOOK I. - SCOPE - DEFINITIONS - GENERAL PROVISIONS TITLE I. - Scope Article 1. § 1. Articles 242, 15° to 19° and 296 to 310, 378 and 379 of the present Law regulate a matter referred to in Article 77 of the Constitution. The other provisions of the present Law, including the Annexes thereto, regulate a matter referred to in Article 78 of the Constitution. § 2. This Law regulates the establishment, activity and the supervision of credit institutions and investment firms which have the capacity of stockbroking firm operating in Belgium, and their potential resolution, to protect savers, investors and the robustness and proper functioning of the financial system. For this purpose, it determines the supervisory task of the National Bank of Belgium in its capacity of national competent authority, namely within the scope of the Single Supervisory Mechanism. Books I to XI and Annexes I to VI of the present Law provide for the partial transposition - which remains limited to the part relating to credit institutions, - of Directive 2013/36/EU; - of Directive 2011/89/EU of
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Court Judgment No. 237/2005, of September 26 (Unofficial Translation)
    Constitutional Court Judgment No. 237/2005, of September 26 (Unofficial translation) The Second Chamber of the Constitutional Court comprising Mr. Guillermo Jiménez Sánchez, President, Mr. Vicente Conde Martín de Hijas, Ms. Elisa Pérez Vera, Mr. Ramón Rodríguez Arribas and Mr. Pascual Sala Sánchez, Judges, has rendered IN THE NAME OF THE KING the following J U D G M E N T in the appeal for protection proceedings Nos. 1744-2003, 1755-2003 and 1773-2003, the first of which was filed by Ms. Rigoberta Menchú Tumn, Ms. Silvia Solórzano Foppa, Ms. Silvia Julieta Solórzano Foppa, Mr. Santiago Solórzano Ureta, Mr. Julio Alfonso Solórzano Foppa, Mr. Lorenzo Villanueva Villanueva, Ms. Juliana Villanueva Villanueva, Mr. Lorenzo Jesús Villanueva Imizocz, Ms. Ana María Gran Cirera, Ms. Montserrat Gibert Grant, Ms. Ana María Gibert Gran, Ms. Concepción Gran Cirera, Mr. José Narciso Picas Vila, Ms. Aura Elena Farfán, Ms. Rosario Pu Gómez, C. I. Est. Prom. Derechos Humanos, Mr. Arcadio Alonzo Fernández, Conavigua, Famdegua and Ms. Ana Lucrecia Molina Theissen, represented by Court Procurator Ms. Gloria Rincón Mayoral and defended by the attorney Mr. Carlos Vila Calvo, and by the Confederación Sindical de Comisiones Obreras, represented by Court Procurator Ms. Isabel Cañedo Vega and defended by the attorney Mr. Antonio García Martín; No. 1755-2003 by the Asociación de Derechos Humanos de España, represented by Court Procurator Ms. Irene Gutiérrez Carrillo and defended by the attorney Mr. Víctor Hortal Fernández; and No. 1773-2003 by Asociación libre de Abogados, Asociación contra la Tortura, Associació d’Amistat amb el Poble de Guatemala, Asociación Centro de Documentación y Solidaridad con América Latina y África and Comité Solidaridad Internacionalista de Zaragoza represented by Court Procurator Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Judgment of the Court, Defrenne/Sabena, Case 43/75 (8 April 1975)
    Judgment of the Court, Defrenne/Sabena, Case 43/75 (8 April 1975) Caption: According to the Court of Justice, in its judgment of 8 April 1976, in Case 43/75, Defrenne/Sabena, articles of the treaty which are mandatory apply not only to the action of public authorities but also extend to independent agreements concluded privately or in the sphere of industrial relations, such as individual contracts and collective labour agreements. Source: Reports of Cases before the Court. 1976. [s.l.]. Copyright: (c) Court of Justice of the European Union URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/judgment_of_the_court_defrenne_sabena_case_43_75_8_april_1975-en-4b9622eb-b750- 4eb2-827f-79f16be9aade.html Publication date: 04/09/2012 1 / 22 04/09/2012 Judgment of the Court 8 April 1976 (1) Gabrielle Defrenne v Société Anonyme Belge de Navigation Aérienne Sabena (preliminary ruling requested by the Cour du travail Brussels) ‘The principle that men and women should receive equal pay for equal work’ Case 43/75 Summary 1. Social policy — Men and women workers — Pay — Equality — Direct discrimination — Individual rights — Protection by national courts (EEC Treaty, Article 119) 2. Social policy — Men and women workers — Pay — Equality — Direct discrimination — Individual rights — Date of taking effect — Time-limit fixed by the Treaty — Resolution of Member States — Directive of Council — Ineffective to vary time-limit — Amendment of Treaty — Method of effecting (EEC Treaty, Articles 119 and 236) 3. Social policy — Men and women workers — Pay — Equality — Direct discrimination — Individual rights — Claims — Retroactivity — Legal certainty (EEC Treaty, Article 119) 4. Social policy — Men and women workers — Pay — Equality — Indirect discrimination — Elimination — Community powers and national powers (EEC Treaty, Article 119) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Federale Des Officiels Techniques
    COMMISSION FEDERALE DES OFFICIELS TECHNIQUES Nominations des arbitres français sur les compétitions internationales 2019, au 04 octobre 2019 Niveau Dates Tournoi Lieu Arbitre ou UM désigné Compétition 08-13 janv Thailand Masters Bangkok BWF Super 300 MESTON François 10-13 janv Estonian International Tallinn Int. Series LAPLACE Patrick 17-20 janv Swedish Open Lund Int. Series DAMANY Xavier 22-27 janv Indonesia Masters Jakarta BWF Super 500 VENET Stéphane 15-17 fév Spanish Junior Oviedo Junior Int. Series VIOLLETTE Gilles 15-17 fév France U17 Open Aire sur la Lys BEC-U17 voir liste 19-24 fév Spain Masters Barcelone BWF Super 300 RUCHMANN Emilie 22-24 fév Italian Junior Milan Junior Int. Series LOYER Julie 26 fév - 03 mars German Open Muelheim an der Ruhr BWF Super 300 BERTIN Véronique Junior Int. Grand 27 fév-03 mars Dutch Junior Haarlem DAMANY Xavier Prix 06-10 mars All England Open Birmingham BWF Super 1000 DITTOO Haidar 07-10 mars Portuguese International Caldas da Rainha Int. Series MATON Evelyne Junior Int. Grand 07-10 mars German Junior Berlin LAPLACE Patrick Prix 12-17 mars Swiss Open Bâle BWF Super 300 SAUVAGE Micheline 19-24 mars Orléans Masters Orléans BWF Super 100 voir liste 26-31 mars India Open New Delhi BWF Super 500 GOUTTE Michel 28-31 mars Polish Open Czestochowa Int. Challenge STRADY Jean-Pierre FAUVET Antoine 04-07 avril Finnish Open Vantaa Int. Challenge COUVAL Sébastien (Assessment) 11-14 avril Dutch International Wateringen Int. Series DELCROIX Claude 18-21 avril Croatian International Zagreb Future Series JOSSE Stéphane 09-12 mai Denmark Challenge Farum Int.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for Mobile European Workers
    GUIDE FOR MOBILE EUROPEAN WORKERS GUIDE FOR MOBILE EUROPEAN WORKERS Dr. Katrin Distler, DGB Ger Essers, FNV European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) 2011 With the financial support of the European Commission About the authors: Ger Essers was born and grew up on the Dutch-German Border (Kerkrade, 1946). He now lives on the Dutch-Belgian border (Maastricht). After a career in education, he has worked for the Dutch trade Union FNV as an adviser on cross-border working since 1993. He was a EURES adviser in the Euregio Rhine- Meuse-Waal, and advised Dutch, Belgian and German cross-border workers. He is co-author of all three editions of the “Guide for Mobile European Workers.” Katrin Distler (born in 1963) grew up on the German-Swiss border. After studying and earning a doctor- ate in Economics, various activities at the University of Freiburg (Germany) and as head of a model project in the State of Baden-Württemberg (Germany) on the promotion of women in industry, she has been active in the German Trade Union Federation (DGB) since 2000. As of 2004, she has been the DGB EURES adviser at the Franco-German-Swiss EURES border partnership and cooperated in the third edition of the “Guide for European Mobile Workers.” Thanks to Bart Vanpoucke of the socialist trade union federation in Belgium (ABVV/FGTB), who was active there until 2009 as EURES adviser for Belgian, French and British cross-border workers and who cooperated in the first two editions of the Guide for European Mobile Workers.” Thanks are also in order to Waldemar Lisowski, representative for foreign contacts and EURES adviser in the Jeleniogórski Region of the Polish trade union „Solidarność”, who contributed several additions to the third edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Statements in Belgium Marc Boes
    Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 10 Issue 3 Winter Winter 1990 Environmental Impact Statements in Belgium Marc Boes Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Marc Boes, Environmental Impact Statements in Belgium, 10 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 522 (1989-1990) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Environmental Impact Statements An Belgium* Marc Boes** I. JURISDICTION IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATErRS A. General Principles of Jurisdiction Until the constitutional amendments of December 24, 1970,1 Belgium was a centralized state, with legislative power vested in the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the King2, executive power vested in the King, and judicial power vested in the Courts3 . The constitutional amendments of 1970 initiated a process, not yet complete, whereby legislative and executive powers were devolved to three regions (Flanders, Wallonia, and Brussels) and to three Communi- * In the following Article, Professor Boes analyzes the statutory framework implementing the use of the environmental impact statement ("EIS'inBelgium. Authority for the EIS flows from the EEC Directive, but as yet, the national government in Belgium has erected no regulatory structure. Thus, the Article examines two of Belgium's regions which have established a regulatory system for EIS's. * Professor, Faculty of Law, Katholieke Universiteit of Leuven.
    [Show full text]
  • YONEX German Open 2017 GERMAN OPEN INSIDE Donnerstag, 2
    Event-Magazin der YONEX German Open 2017 GERMAN OPEN INSIDE Donnerstag, 2. März 2017 „Danke für sechs wunderschöne Jahre!“ Birgit Overzier und Michael Fuchs verabschiedeten sich am Mittwoch mit einem Klassematch von der internationalen Bühne und ihren Fans. GERMAN OPEN INSIDE - Donnerstag 3 Match of the Day 4 - 5 Höhepunkte am Donnerstag 129 - 13-13 Bericht XXXX Mittwoch 6 - 7 Turniergeschichten 14 -18 Ergebnisse 8 Foto des Tages 19 Spielplan Donnerstag Die innogy Sporthalle – seit 2005 werden die YONEX German Open in Mülheim an der Ruhr ausgetragen. Ergebnisse und Infos auf YONEX German Open german-open-badminton.de auf Facebook Impressum Herausgeber des Eventmagazins: Hinweise: Vermarktungsgesellschaft Der Herausgeber des Eventmaga- Badminton zins haftet nicht für den Inhalt der Deutschland mbH (VBD) veröffentlichten Anzeigen Südstraße 25a, D-45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr Team: Tel.: 0208/308 2717 Claudia Pauli (cp) E-Mail: janet.bourakkadi @ Sven Heise (sh) vbd-badminton.de Stephan Wilde (sw) Copyright: Papier & Druck: Nachdruck, auch auszugsweise, Konica Minolta Business nur mit ausdrücklicher Einwilli- Solutions Deutschland GmbH gung des Herausgebers und unter Alexanderstraße 38 voller Quellenangabe 45472 Mülheim an der Ruhr 2 German Open Inside | 2.3.2017 Match of the Day Achtelfinale Herreneinzel 19.55 Uhr auf Spielfeld 2 Fabian Roth – Takuma Ueda Fast ein Jahr musste Fabian Roth nach ei­ deutsche Team im Halbfinale gegen Däne­ ner Hüftoperation pausieren, dann legte er mark 1:3 und gewann Bronze. Den einzigen ein großartiges Comeback hin. Bei seinem Sieg steuerte Fabian bei – mit einer sensa­ ersten Turnier, den Belgian International im tionellen Leistung bezwang er den Europa­ September 2016 belegte er Platz drei.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. There Are Two Possible Solutions on This Matter, Belgium Or Germany Could Have Jurisdiction on the Divorce As Detailed Below
    1. There are two possible solutions on this matter, Belgium or Germany could have jurisdiction on the divorce as detailed below. Art. 3 (1) a) of the Council Regulation 2201/2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (hereinafter: Brussels II Regulation) deals with the general jurisdiction over proceedings concerning divorce, legal separation and marriage annulment. In our case the couple decided to divorce on 15 April in 2007. Before that time Franz moved to Germany on 15 March in 2007 for living and establishment. Because they do not have the same habitually residence – Franz moved to an other MS – that is why we can use Art 3. (1) a) ii: “the spouses were last habitually resident, insofar as one of them still resides there”. With regard to the fact that their last common habitual residence was Belgium and Roza still resides there that is why the jurisdiction could be Belgium. Neither the Brussels II Regulation, nor the Brussels IIA Regulation provides an explicit definition of habitual residence. According to the Borras Report habitual residence where the person had established, on a fix basis, his permanent of habitual centre of interest, with all the relevant facts being taken into account for the purpose of determining such residence. As a matter of fact that Franz Becker and Rosa Neeskens moved to Brussels with the children in 17 January 2007, therefore Belgium became their habitual residence. On the other hand jurisdiction can also be based on Art 3. (1) a) iii.: “the respondent is habitually resident”.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal of the European Union
    Official Journal C 87 of the European Union Volume 63 English edition Information and Notices 16 March 2020 Contents IV Notices NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES Court of Justice of the European Union 2020/C 87/01 Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union . 1 V Announcements COURT PROCEEDINGS Court of Justice 2020/C 87/02 Case C-569/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Potenza (Italy) lodged on 26 July 2019 — OM v Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca and Others . 2 2020/C 87/03 Case C-829/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 13 November 2019 — XY v KLM Cityhopper BV . 2 2020/C 87/04 Case C-836/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gera (Germany) lodged on 18 November 2019 — Toropet Ltd. v Landkreis Greiz . 3 2020/C 87/05 Case C-854/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 22 November 2019 — Vodafone GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany . 3 2020/C 87/06 Case C-869/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 28 November 2019 — L v Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria, S.A.U. 5 EN 2020/C 87/07 Case C-873/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 29 November 2019 — Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Plan for the Belgian International Cooperation 3) Communication of Information
    KINGDOM OF BELGIUM 2002 REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION (UNCCD) Ministry of Foreign Affairs Directorate General for International Cooperation Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1) Belgium and the UNCCD 2) Policy plan for the Belgian international cooperation 3) Communication of information CHAPTER I: AFRICA PART A (i) Summary (ii) Consultative processes and partnership agreements: - National level - International level (iii) Preparation and implementation of action programs at all levels PART B CHAPTER II: ASIA PART A (i) Summary (ii) Consultative processes and partnership agreements a) National level b) International level (iii) Preparation and implementation of action programs at all levels PART B CHAPTER III: LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN PART A (i) Summary (ii) Consultative processes and partnership agreements: a. National level b. International level (iii) Preparation and implementation of action programs at all levels PART B ANNEXES I, II AND III 2 Belgium 2002 Report to UNCCD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY After having participated in the INCD process from the very beginning in 1992, Belgium became a Party to the UNCCD on June 30, 1997. Belgium has a long-standing history of activities in combating desertification, particularly in Africa. Today, the UNCCD offers an international legal framework for renewed attention towards the range of desertification problems and Belgium stands ready to continue and improve its actions in this field. In accordance with the reporting obligations of the Convention and with Decisions 11/COP.1 and 1/COP.5, Belgium presents its report, as an update, on its desertification initiatives in the African region, the Asian region and the Latin American and Caribbean region.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Can Civil Law Countries Get Good Institutions? Creditor Rights and Bond Markets in Brazil, 1850-2003. Aldo Musacchio* Abstract Can we assume that the effect of early institutions is persistent over time? Work by La Porta, Lopez de Silanes, Shleifer, and Vishny, also known as the “law and finance” literature, implicitly argues that the legal tradition countries inherited or adopted in the far past has an important long-term effect on financial development. They argue financial development is related to the extent countries legally protect shareholders and creditors. Also, they find that countries that use the common law legal system have (on average) better investor protections than most civil law countries. I test three hypotheses that stem from the law and finance literature. First, I test if strong creditor rights are actually related to having larger bond markets once we look at a long time series. I look at the relationship between these two variables using data of creditor rights and bond market development in Brazil since 1850. I find support for this part of their argument. Second, I explore the supposed persistent relationship between legal origin and creditor rights. I argue that the variation in creditor rights is too large for us to believe that legal origin has a path-dependent and “stable” relationship with these rights. I provide a political economy explanation of the variation in creditor rights since 1850 in Brazil. Finally, I ask if the significant variation in creditor rights over time in Brazil is a case-specific phenomenon or if it in fact reflects a general trend in legal protections for creditors across countries.
    [Show full text]
  • SANTE/10623/2015-EN Rev. 1 ANNEX
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 3.7.2015 C(2015) 4460 final ANNEX 1 ANNEX to the COMMISSION DECISION establishing a model for agreements between the Commission and relevant organisations on the provision of product codes for use in the Single European Code EN EN ANNEX Model for agreements on the provision of product codes for use in the Single European Code Agreement between [insert full name of organisation] and the European Commission on the terms and conditions for the provision of [insert name of organisation] product codes for use in the Single European Code The European Commission, represented by the Director-General of the Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, having its seat at 200, Rue de la Loi, 1049 Brussels, Belgium, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Commission’, on the one part, and [insert full name of organisation], represented by the Chairperson, having its seat at [insert address of organisation], hereinafter referred to as [insert name of organisation], on the other part, hereinafter each individually referred to as ‘the Party’ and jointly referred to as ‘the Parties’ Whereas: (1) Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1 lays down the legal framework for traceability of human tissues and cells. In accordance with Article 25(2) of that Directive, the Commission in cooperation with the Member States is to design a single European coding system to provide information about the main characteristics and properties of tissues and cells. (2) Commission Directive 2006/86/EC2 lays down the structure and characteristics of the Single European Code (hereinafter ‘the SEC’) to be applied to human tissues and cells distributed in the European Union, as well as the requirements for use of the SEC.
    [Show full text]