NOAA Pacific Charts Catalog Reference
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Northern Marianas
Northern Marianas Overview: The Marianas is an archipelago made up by the summits of 15 volcanic mountains in the north-western Pacific Ocean. The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) is in political union with the United States. Territory: Includes 14 islands, including Saipan, Rota, and Tinian which are inhabited; and Farallon de Pajaros, Maug Islands, Pagan Island, Guguan, Agrihan Island, Sarigan Island, Anatahan Island, Asuncion Island and Farallon de Medinilla which are currently uninhabited due to volcanic activity. The southern islands are limestone with level terraces and fringing coral reefs; the northern islands are volcanic. Land: 477 sq km; Water: 0 sq km; Total: 477 sq km; Coast line: 1,482 km; Highest point: unnamed location on Agrihan 965 m. Location: Oceania, islands in the North Pacific Ocean, about three-quarters of the way from Hawaii to the Philippines. Latitude and Longitude: 15 1' 2" N, 145 4' 5" E. Time Zone: GMT +10 Total Land Area: 477 EEZ: 200 Climate: tropical marine; moderated by northeast trade winds, little seasonal temperature variation; dry season December to June, rainy season July to October. Natural Resources: arable land, fish. All the islands except Farallon de Medinilla and Urracas or Mangs (in the northern group) are more or less densely wooded, and the vegetation is luxuriant, much resembling that of the Carolines, and also of the Philippines, whence many species of plants have been introduced. Owing to the humidity of the soil cryptogams are numerous, as also most kinds of grasses. Agriculture is neglected, in spite of the exceptional advantages offered by the climate and soil. -
COCONUT CRAB (Birgus Latro) SURVEYS on PAGAN, COMMONWEALTH of the NORTHERN MARIANAS ISLANDS
COCONUT CRAB (Birgus latro) SURVEYS ON PAGAN, COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANAS ISLANDS Prepared by: Scott Vogt Wildlife Biologist U.S. Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Far East Command Yokosuka, Japan December 2010 INTRODUCTION The coconut or robber crab (Birgus latro) has a wide distribution ranging from Eastern Africa, through the Indian Ocean islands to the Pacific Ocean islands (Fletcher and Amos, 1994). Due to its large size, ease of collection and palatable flesh, the coconut crab is often over-harvested when it occurs in the vicinity of human habitation. The Mariana Islands are no exception and this species is heavily harvested as a cultural resource. Surveys on Guam (USFWS, 2001), Saipan (Kessler, 2006) and Tinian (U.S. Navy, 2008) have documented over-harvested populations. Coconut crabs are a type of hermit crab; however they abandon the necessity of residing in a discarded snail shell at a small size and go through life with no added protection other than their own carapace. They are the largest land dwelling invertebrate in the world and can reach a weight in excess of 5kg. Coconut crabs breed on land but the female releases the eggs in the ocean where they immediately hatch. The oceanic larval stage lasts 2-3 weeks (Fletcher and Amos, 1994). Once on land the growth rate is slow and it is estimated to take 8-10 years to reach the CNMI legal size limit of 3 inches (76mm) across the back (Brown and Fielder, 1991). On the southern islands (Rota, Saipan Tinian and Aguiguan), the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands – Division of Fish & Wildlife has established a legal crab hunting season from September 15 - November 15. -
Structured Decision Making for Delta Smelt Demo Project
Structured Decision Making for Delta Smelt Demo Project Prepared for CSAMP/CAMT Project funded by State and Federal Water Contractors Prepared by Graham Long and Sally Rudd Compass Resource Management Ltd. 604.641.2875 Suite 210- 111 Water Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6B 1A7 www.compassrm.com Date May 4, 2018 April 13th – reviewed by TWG and comments incorporated Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... i Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... iii Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Approach .......................................................................................................................... 1 Problem Definition ........................................................................................................... 4 Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 5 Alternatives ...................................................................................................................... 9 Evaluation of Trade-offs ................................................................................................. 17 Discussion and Recommendations ................................................................................ -
Municipal Water Quality Investigations Program History and Studies 1983—2012
State of California The Resources Agency Department of Water Resources Municipal Water Quality Investigations Program History and Studies 1983—2012 November 2013 Edmund Brown Jr. John Laird Mark W. Cowin Governor Secretary for Resources Director State of California The Resources Agency Department of Water Resources State of California Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor California Natural Resources Agency John Laird, Secretary for Natural Resources Department of Water Resources Mark W. Cowin, Director Laura King Moon, Chief Deputy Director Office of the Chief Counsel Public Affairs Office Security Operations Cathy Crothers Nancy Vogel, Ass't Dir. Sonny Fong Gov't & Community Liaison Policy Advisor Legislative Affairs Office Kimberly Johnston~ Dodds Waiman Yip Kasey Schimke, Ass't Dir. Deputy Directors Paul Helliker Delta and Statewide Water Management Gary Bardini Integrated Water Management Carl Torgersen State Water Project John Pacheco California Energy Resources Scheduling Kathie Kishaba Business Operations Division of Environmental Services Dean F. Messer, Chief Office of Water Quality Stephani Spaar, Chief Municipal Water Quality Program Branch Municipal Water Quality Investigations Section Cindy Garcia, Chief Rachel Pisor, Chief Ofelia Bogdan, Staff Services Analyst Prepared By Sonia Miller, Project Leader Otome J. Lindsey Foreword The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) is a major source of drinking water for 25 million people of the State of California. Therefore, the quality of Delta water is an important consideration for its use as a drinking water source. However, Delta water quality may be degraded by a variety of sources and environmental factors. Close monitoring of Delta waters is necessary to ensure delivery of high quality source waters to urban water suppliers. -
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (Cnmi) Statewide Assessment and Resource Strategy 2010-2015+
COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS (CNMI) STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT AND RESOURCE STRATEGY 2010-2015+ June 2010 Developed by: CNMI SWARS Council Table of Contents Page What is SWARS?....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Farm Bill Sec.8002…………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 National Themes and Objectives………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Statewide Resource Assessment…………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Mission Statement……………………………………………………………………………………………… … 5 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 CNMI and its Government Structure……………………………………………………………….…… 5 CNMI Constitution……………………………………………………………………………………… 5 CNMI Islands Geographic Location…………………………………………………………………....... 5 History of the CNMI’s Forest Conditions……………………………………………………………… 6 CNMI Forest Resource…………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 Soil (Conditions and Trends) …………………………………………………………………………. 7 o Maps of Soil…………………………………………………………………………………. 8 o Units of Soil…………………………………………………………………………………. 8 Watershed (Sustainability, Conditions and Trends……………………………………………………... 9 Issues/Trends…………………………………………………………………………………………. 9 o Erosion / Maps of Highly Erodible Soil……………………………………………………… 9 o Soil and Nutrient Depletion...………………………………………………………………... 9 o Water Shortage……………..……………………………………………………………….... 9 o Flood………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 Priority Watershed (Map)……………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 THEME I (Conservation)……………………………………………………………………………………… -
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Economic Report October 2003 P ACIFIC OCEAN
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Economic Report October 2003 P ACIFIC OCEAN HAWAII •Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands/Saipan •Guam HAWAII Republic of Palau Kauai • Oahu Niihau Molokai Maui Lanai American Samoa • Kahoolawe Hawaii Locations (Maps not shown to scale.) BANK OF HAWAII BRANCHES ABOUT BANK OF HAWAII The Bank provides convenient & IN-STORE BRANCHES access to financial services through (as of December 31, 2002) Bank of Hawaii Corporation is a its network of branches, in-store regional financial services company branches and ATMs, and its 24- Hawaii 76 serving businesses, consumers and hour telephone and Internet governments in Hawaii, American banking services. American Samoa 3 Samoa and the West Pacific. The Commonwealth of company’s principal subsidiary, As a company, we are committed to Northern Mariana Bank of Hawaii, was founded in providing the highest level of Islands/Saipan 2 1897 and is the largest independent quality customer service. For more financial institution in Hawaii. information about Bank of Hawaii, Guam 9 please visit our website at Republic of Palau 1 Bank of Hawaii Corporation and its www.boh.com. subsidiaries offer a wide range of financial products and services, Total 91 including: deposit and lending services, investments, trust services, private banking, leasing, mortgage, insurance, cash management, employee benefits and retirement plan services. www.boh.com TO OUR READERS: We are pleased to present this 2003 edition of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) Economic Report under a regional research and study partnership between Bank of Hawaii and the East-West Center. CNMI is one of the West Pacific markets which Bank of Hawaii serves, and the Bank’s presence here goes back more than three decades. -
Delta Region Drinking Water Quality Management Plan
DELTA REGION DRINKING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT FINAL June 2005 Funding for this project was made possible by a CALFED Grant through the Drinking Water Quality Program This document was funded by the CALFED Water Quality Program as an initial effort to create Regional “Equivalent Level of Public Health Protection” Plans and to assist in establishing a uniform framework in such planning. It is not intended to be a final document. California Bay-Delta Authority and CALFED WQP Implementing Agency staff have not had the opportunity to review and comment on this document, and any opinions or interpretations of the CALFED program expressed within the document are solely those of its authors. The CALFED WQP is committed to working with these and other parties to continue development and refinement of Regional Plans. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2004, the CALFED Bay-Delta Program (CALFED) commissioned a pilot program for development of regional drinking water quality management plans (i) to identify the drinking water quality issues and needs of drinking water agencies in different regions of California and (ii) to develop solutions to address those needs. This Delta Region Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DRDWQMP) was developed jointly by Contra Costa Water District (CCWD), the city of Stockton (COS), and Solano County Water Agency (SCWA). Figure ES-1 shows the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) region, with an outline representing Delta boundaries as defined in California Water Code Section 12220, along with the service areas of the three participating agencies. These three agencies represent the largest urban water users within the Delta region. -
19 Aug Deployed Coral Reef Early Warning System (CREWS) Buoy in Managaha Reserve in Saipan Lagoon
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE/NOAA FISHERIES Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center 2570 Dole St. • Honolulu, Hawaii 96822-2396 (808) 983-5300 • Fax: (808) 983-2902 CRUISE REPORT1 VESSEL: Oscar Elton Sette, Cruise 03-07 (OES-08) PERIOD: 19 August – 30 September 2003 AREA OF OPERATION: Commonwealth of the Mariana Islands and Guam TYPE OF OPERATION: Personnel from the Coral Reef Ecosystem Division, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, and partner agencies conducted reef ecosystem assessment/monitoring in waters surrounding the Commonwealth of the Mariana Islands and Guam. This Mariana Archipelago Reef Assessment and Monitoring Program (MARAMP) cruise is part of NOAA’s Coral Reef Conservation Program (CRCP) to conduct biennial coral reef ecosystem monitoring at each of the U.S.-affiliated Pacific Islands. ITINERARY: 19 Aug Deployed Coral Reef Early Warning System (CREWS) buoy in Managaha Reserve in Saipan Lagoon. 20-21 Aug Conducted shipboard orientation, dive safety management drills, and fire and abandon ship drills. Conducted fish and benthic Rapid Ecological Assessment (REA) team and towed-diver protocol training dives off leeward Saipan. 22 Aug Departed Saipan Harbor to begin cruise. Conducted six towed-diver habitat/fish surveys, two towed snorkeler turtle surveys, three benthic and two fish REA surveys along the north and east sides of Saipan. Conducted 20 shallow water conductivity-temperature- depth (CTD) casts around Saipan. Deployed settlement plates around anchor for CREWS buoy. Conducted two Tethered Optical Assessment Device (TOAD) camera drop surveys, four acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) transects, and four deepwater (500 m) CTDs around Saipan. -
A Conceptual Model of Sedimentation in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta
Peer Reviewed Title: A Conceptual Model of Sedimentation in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta Journal Issue: San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 10(3) Author: Schoellhamer, David H., U.S. Geological Survey Wright, Scott A., U.S. Geological Survey Drexler, Judy, U.S. Geological Survey Publication Date: 2012 Publication Info: San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, John Muir Institute of the Environment, UC Davis Permalink: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2652z8sq Acknowledgements: We thank David Fryberg, Denise Reed, Stuart Siegel, Mark Stacey, the DRERIP review panel, and the other DRERIP model authors for their assistance in developing this model. Justin Ferris, Mick van der Wegen, and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on initial drafts of this manuscript. Keywords: Sediment, sediment transport, sedimentation, Sacramento – San Joaquin River Delta, conceptual model, feedback, open water, tidal marsh, watershed, vegetation, sea level rise, Central Valley Local Identifier: jmie_sfews_11152 Abstract: Sedimentation in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta builds the Delta landscape, creates benthic and pelagic habitat, and transports sediment-associated contaminants. Here we present a conceptual model of sedimentation that includes submodels for river supply from the watershed to the Delta, regional transport within the Delta and seaward exchange, and local sedimentation in open water and marsh habitats. The model demonstrates feedback loops that affect the Delta ecosystem. Submerged and emergent marsh vegetation act as ecosystem engineers that can create a positive feedback loop by decreasing suspended sediment, increasing water column eScholarship provides open access, scholarly publishing services to the University of California and delivers a dynamic research platform to scholars worldwide. -
Recent Population Trends for the US Island Areas
Recent Population Trends for the U.S. Island Areas: 2000 to 2010 Special Studies Current Population Reports By Justyna Goworowska and Steven Wilson Issued April 2015 P23-213 U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census.gov Acknowledgments This report was prepared by Justyna Goworowska and Steven Wilson of the U.S. Census Bureau. Direction for the report was provided by Marc Perry, Chief, Population Distribution Branch, Population Division. Victoria Velkoff, former Chief, Population Division, provided overall direction. Special thanks to Thomas Fischetti who contributed to an earlier draft of the report, Rachel Marks, Ethnicity and Ancestry Branch, Population Division, and April Avnayim, Geographic Standards and Criteria Branch, Geography Division, for topic area expertise, and to Karen Humes, former Assistant Division Chief for Special Population Statistics, Population Division, for subject matter guidance. Thanks to Joshua Comenetz and Frank Hobbs from the Census Bureau’s Population Division, James Fitzsimmons, Assistant Division Chief for Geographic Studies and Information Resources, Population Division, and Marjorie Hanson in the Office of the Associate Director of Demographic Programs for the thorough review of the report. James Farber with the Demographic Statistical Methods Division provided statistical review of the report. Amanda Perry of the Census Bureau’s Center for New Media and Promotions and Anthony Richards of the Public Information Office provided publication management, graphics design and composition, and editorial review for print and electronic media. Recent Population Trends for the U.S. Island Areas: 2000 to 2010 Issued April 2015 P23-213 U.S. Department of Commerce Penny Pritzker, Secretary Bruce H. -
Datum Errors for West Coast of the United States (California, Oregon, Washington)
Tidal Datum Errors for West Coast of the United States (California, Oregon, Washington) Standard deviation (or accuracy) of Tidal Datum Computations: The time period necessary to incorporate all of the major astronomical tide producing cycles into the computation of a tidal datum is 19-years. All tidal datums are referenced to specific 19-year National Tidal Datum Epochs (NTDE). First reduction tidal datums are determined directly by averaging values of the tidal parameters over a 19-year NDTE. Errors in determination of tidal datums using First Reduction for the 19-year NTDE are theoretically zero. NTDE datums for short-term subordinate stations are computed and adjusted to a 19-year NTDE equivalent using simultaneous comparison with an appropriate nearby control station (NOS, 2003, Swanson, 1974, and Marmer, 1951). See Gill and Fisher, 2008: http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/Technical_Memorandum_NOS_COOPS_0048.pdf for the areas of coverage for tidal datum computation for each National Water Level Observation Network (NWLON) control tide station. Errors in determination of tidal datums at short-term stations through the method of simultaneous comparison are known to be generally correlated with the length if the subordinate station observations, with geographic distance from the control station and with difference in range of tide and time of tide between control and subordinate stations. In applied research performed by Bodnar (1981), multiple curvilinear regression equations estimating the accuracy of computed 19-year equivalent tidal datums were developed. The formulas for Mean Low Water were adopted for use in estimating tidal datum errors because the low water differences express the effects of shallow water and bottom friction better than MHW. -
Flood Contingency Public Safety
PUBLIC SAFETY FLOOD CONTINGENCY N ' 121°39'W 121°38'30"W 121°38'W 121°37'30"W 121°37'W 121°36'30"W 121°36'W 121°35'30"W 121°35'W 121°34'30"W 121°34'W 121°33'30"W 121°33'W 2 N ' 121°39'W 121°38'30"W 121°38'W 121°37'30"W 121°37'W 121°36'30"W 121°36'W 121°35'30"W 121°35'W 121°34'30"W 121°34'W 121°33'30"W 121°33'W ° 2 8 ° N 3 ' 8 2 N 3 ' C ° 2 8 a C ° 3 n a 8 a Holland Tract n 3 l 1 a Holland Tract 8 l 1 0 8 + 0 R 0 RD 2025 + d Frank's Tract 0 R 0 RD 2025 d Frank's Tract 0 The symbology presented in the legend below is global to the The symbology presented in the legend below is global to the project area, some symbols may not be present on map project area, some symbols may not be present on map H5 d R d r R TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION r e H3 e QUIMBY ISLAND p N i " Gate p 0 Gate N i " 3 P ' 0 0 1 0 + 3 P ° 0 ' 16 N " 8 1 RD 2090 ° 0 3 N ROADS " 8 3 ' 0 ROADS 3 1 3 ° 2 ' 8 1 1 ° 0 3 2 1 8 BETHEL SL + QUIMBY ISLAND 3 I AND 0 0 0 BETHEL ISLAND + 0 H 0 Major Local Trail, 150+0 Major Local Trail, 0 0 Interstate Highway Trail MUNICIPAL ID 2 RD 2090 Interstate Highway Trail 150+0 Road Road Major 2 o Road Road Major 2 0 MUNICIPAL ID 2 + 0 0 l + H2 0 0 H h l 0 H Gate a way Rd g Ga o a ylo r u te way Rd PS T n o FFM ylo r l R l Ta l FLOOD CONTINGENCY OPTIONS d d S 2 LEVEE INFORMATION Rd a 4 A FFM C N ' d 0 A D D 1 + 0 N 0 ' n u ° n 30+ Flood Contingency Special Flood 0 1 1000-Foot Levee Stationing 1 8 00 ° + 0 t N 0 3 2 3 u ' 300+00 290+00 1 8 d 1 5 N 3 2 Option Consideration o ' 0 ° PS 5 1 8 Levee Centerline + 0 C ° d M 3 R 0 + H3 8 d 3 Effluent