DOCSLIB.ORG

United States District Court District of Massachusetts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States District Court District of Massachusetts Case 1:21-cv-10102-ADB Document 21 Filed 07/21/21 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC. * * Plaintiff, * * v. * Civil Action No. 21-cv-10102-ADB * CITY OF BOSTON, MA * * Defendant. * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS BURROUGHS, D.J. Plaintiff The Satanic Temple, Inc. (“TST”) asserts four federal and state constitutional claims against Defendant City of Boston (“Defendant”): violation of the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution (Count I); violation of the Free Speech Clause and the Free Exercise Clause of the United States Constitution (Count II); violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution (Count III); and violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the Massachusetts Constitution (Count IV). [ECF No. 16 (“Am. Compl.”)]. Currently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss TST’s entire complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 12(b)(1) based on lack of standing and to dismiss Counts I–III of TST’s complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. [ECF No. 17]. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The following facts are drawn from the amended complaint and taken as true for the purposes of evaluating the motion to dismiss. See Ruivo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 766 F.3d Case 1:21-cv-10102-ADB Document 21 Filed 07/21/21 Page 2 of 16 87, 90 (1st Cir. 2014). As it may on a motion to dismiss, the Court has also considered “documents incorporated by reference in [the complaint], matters of public record, and other matters susceptible to judicial notice.” Giragosian v. Ryan, 547 F.3d 59, 65 (1st Cir. 2008) (alteration in original) (quoting In re Colonial Mortg. Bankers Corp., 324 F.3d 12, 20 (1st Cir. 2003)). TST is a religious organization headquartered in Salem, MA. [Am. Compl. ¶ 20]. Its Boston metropolitan Chapter has 2,449 members. [Id. ¶ 21]. In 2016, 2017, and 2018, TST reached out to the Boston City Council, which opens each of its meetings with a prayer, asking to give the invocation. [Id. ¶¶ 12, 23; ECF No. 16-1]. Defendant denied those requests, explaining that City Councilors choose speakers from their communities for their assigned weeks, and that TST could not lead the prayer without an invitation from a City Councilor. [Am. Compl. ¶¶ 13, 24; ECF No. 16-2]. Those denials were made after members of the Boston public objected to the possibility of TST opening a City Council session with a prayer and in the wake of a public outcry and 2,000-person protest after TST attempted to stage a “Black Mass” at Harvard. [Id. ¶¶ 30–33, 37]. Over 233 City Council meetings from 2011 to mid-2017, 78.5% of the prayer-givers were Christian, 4.7% were Muslim, and 4.3% were Jewish. [Id. ¶¶ 59, 62–64]. There was also one Hindu and one secular prayer offered. [Id. ¶¶ 67-68].1 B. Procedural Background On October 17, 2018, TST brought a claim of discrimination in a place of public accommodation under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 151B to the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination. [Am. Compl. ¶¶ 43–45]. Although the Commission ruled 1 The cited instances add up to only 88.5% of the prayer opportunities. The Amended Complaint does not specify the prayer-givers or the content of the remaining 11.5%. 2 Case 1:21-cv-10102-ADB Document 21 Filed 07/21/21 Page 3 of 16 that the City Council session was not a “place of public accommodation,” as defined by the statute, it did not rule on the constitutionality of Defendant’s selection scheme for legislative prayer-givers. [Id. ¶¶ 55–56]. On January 24, 2021, TST commenced the present action, [ECF No. 2], and on April 26, 2021, filed its amended complaint, alleging that the City unconstitutionally grants invitations to “preferred” religions while refusing to invite TST because of its “undesirable” status, [Am. Compl. ¶¶ 52, 58]. TST asks the court to declare that Defendant’s legislative prayer selection process violates the federal and state constitutions as it results in invitations to give an invocation being extended to representatives of some religious groups but not others and to enjoin that process. [Id. at 20]. II. LEGAL STANDARD A motion to dismiss for lack of constitutional standing is properly brought as a challenge to the court’s subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1). See Katz v. Pershing, LLC, 672 F.3d 64, 70 (1st Cir. 2012). The party asserting federal jurisdiction has the burden of demonstrating its existence. Viqueira v. First Bank, 140 F.3d 12, 16 (1st Cir. 1998). Dismissal is appropriate only when the facts alleged in the complaint, taken as true and given all reasonable inferences, do not support a finding of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Fothergill v. United States, 566 F.3d 248, 251 (1st Cir. 2009). A challenge to the court’s subject matter jurisdiction must be addressed before addressing the merits of a case. See Acosta-Ramirez v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, 712 F.3d 14, 18 (1st Cir. 2013) (citing Donahue v. City of Boston, 304 F.3d 110, 117 (1st Cir. 2002)) (“Federal courts are obliged to resolve questions pertaining to subject-matter jurisdiction before addressing the merits of a case”). In reviewing a motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6), the Court must accept all well- pleaded facts as true, analyze those facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and draw all 3 Case 1:21-cv-10102-ADB Document 21 Filed 07/21/21 Page 4 of 16 reasonable factual inferences in favor of the plaintiff. See Gilbert v. City of Chicopee, 915 F.3d 74, 76, 80 (1st Cir. 2019). “[D]etailed factual allegations” are not required, but the complaint must set forth “more than labels and conclusions,” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007), and must contain “factual allegations, either direct or inferential, respecting each material element necessary to sustain recovery under some actionable legal theory,” Gagliardi v. Sullivan, 513 F.3d 301, 305 (1st Cir. 2008) (internal quotations omitted) (citing Centro Médico del Turabo, Inc. v. Feliciano de Melecio, 406 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir. 2005)). The alleged facts must be sufficient to “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570. “To cross the plausibility threshold a claim does not need to be probable, but it must give rise to more than a mere possibility of liability.” Grajales v. P.R. Ports Auth., 682 F.3d 40, 44–45 (1st Cir. 2012) (citing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). “A determination of plausibility is ‘a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense.’” Id. at 44 (quoting Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 679). III. DISCUSSION Defendant moves to dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety under FRCP 12(b)(1), asserting that TST lacks standing for its Free Speech/Free Exercise Claim because it has not been injured by Defendant, and that, more broadly, its harms could not be redressed by a favorable decision. [ECF No. 17]. See Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992). It also argues that, pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), TST’s claims under the Establishment Clause are barred by Supreme Court precedent and that TST has not plausibly stated claims for relief under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. [ECF No. 17]. 4 Case 1:21-cv-10102-ADB Document 21 Filed 07/21/21 Page 5 of 16 A. Standing The doctrine of standing is rooted in Article III of the Constitution, which confines federal courts to the adjudication of actual “cases” and “controversies.” See U.S. Const. Art. III, § 2, cl. 1; Lujan, 504 U.S. at 560–61. Standing consists of three elements: “[t]he plaintiff must have (1) suffered an injury in fact, (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the defendant, and (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1547, as revised (May 24, 2016) (quoting Lujan, 504 U.S. at 560–61). Where, as here, the question of standing is based on the pleadings, TST “bears the burden of establishing sufficient factual matter to plausibly demonstrate [its] standing to bring the action,” Hochendoner v. Genzyme Corp., 823 F.3d 724, 731 (1st Cir. 2016), taking all of the facts (and any inferences that follow) in the plaintiff’s favor, Gustavsen v. Alcon Lab’ys., Inc., 903 F.3d 1, 7 (1st Cir. 2018) (quoting Katz, 672 F.3d at 70–71). To establish injury in fact, a plaintiff must demonstrate “an invasion of a legally protected interest” that is “concrete and particularized” and “actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.” Lujan, 504 U.S. at 560. “The particularization element of the injury-in-fact inquiry reflects the commonsense notion that the party asserting standing must not only allege injurious conduct attributable to the defendant but also must allege that he, himself, is among the persons injured by that conduct.” Hochendoner, 823 F.3d at 731–32. To establish redressability, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the alleged injury “is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision.” Valley Forge Christian Coll. v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Inc., 454 U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Religion and the New Politics
    Religion and the New Politics Edited by Ronald A. Simkins and Zachary B. Smith 6. The New Politics of Religious Freedom Humanitarian Aid and Sanctuary as Religious Mandates Laura E. Alexander, University of Nebraska at Omaha Abstract Interreligious organizations that provide aid to immigrants are changing the way scholars and the public understand religious freedom in the United States. Members of these organizations draw on laws and ideals of free exercise of religion to challenge policies that limit humanitarian aid to immigrants. At the same time, they create networks across religious difference. In so doing, these groups enter a global debate over the value of borders and boundaries, making a religiously grounded case for building bonds of fellowship across both national borders and the boundary lines that separate people based on identity. The work of these groups provides a window both into legal debates over religious freedom, and postcolonial challenges to modern-era categories of difference. Keywords: religious freedom, interreligious cooperation, immigration, borders 81 Religion and the New Politics Introduction The First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees freedom of religious exercise. How to balance this freedom against other constitutional rights and government interests has, of course, been a matter of debate since the Bill of Rights was ratified. With the passage of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (Pub. L. 103–41, 107 Stat. 1488) (RFRA) of 1993, as well as increased deference in United States courts to legal arguments based on religious freedom, it has become much more common for individuals and groups to successfully claim, on religious grounds, exemptions from laws that are neutral on their face but impact religious practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satanic Temple, Scott Walker, and Contraception: a Partial Account of Hobby Lobby’S Implications for State Law
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLP\9-1\HLP104.txt unknown Seq: 1 18-MAR-15 13:55 The Satanic Temple, Scott Walker, and Contraception: A Partial Account of Hobby Lobby’s Implications for State Law Kara Loewentheil* INTRODUCTION Reaction to the Supreme Court’s opinion in Hobby Lobby1 was swift and extreme from almost all quarters. Beyond the predictable legal blogs, newspaper articles, and talking heads on TV, there were more unusual re- sponses from across the political spectrum. Members of The Satanic Temple, a religious group2 focused on “personal autonomy, individual freedom, and ethical action,” announced that they would henceforth be objecting to so- called “informed consent” statutes in the abortion services context.3 To make good on that promise, they made available an online form for anyone, Satanist or otherwise, who wanted to claim a religious exemption from being required to comply with such statutes.4 Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s Administration, on the other hand, announced that it would no longer be enforcing Wisconsin’s contraceptive equity law because it was “preempted” by the Supreme Court’s decision.5 But as is so often the case with extremes, neither interpretation of the case comes close to the mark. The confusion about the reach and scope of Hobby Lobby is of tremendous significance as state legislatures, courts, ad- ministrative agencies, and citizens begin to grapple with its consequences, * Research Fellow, Columbia Law School & Director, Public Rights / Private Conscience Project, Columbia Law School. The author is entirely indebted to Nicole Taykhman for her invaluable research assistance, without which this article would quite literally not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satanic Bible Anton Szandor Lavey
    Called “The Black Pope” by many of his followers, Anton LaVey began the road to High Priesthood of the Church of Satan when he was only 16 years old and an organ player in a carnival: “On Saturday night I would see men lusting after half‐naked girls dancing at the carnival, and on Sunday morning when I was playing the organ for tent‐show evangelists at the other end of the carnival lot, I would see these same men sitting in the pews with their wives and children, asking God to forgive them and purge them of carnal desires. And the next Saturday night they’d be back at the carnival or some other place of indulgence. “I knew then that the Christian Church thrives on hypocrisy, and that man’s carnal nature will out!” From that time early in his life his path was clear. Finally, on the last night of April, 1966– Walpurgisnacht, the most important festival of the believers in witchcraft–LaVey shaved his head in the tradition of ancient executioners and announced the formation of The Church Of Satan. He had seen the need for a church that would recapture man’s body and his carnal desires as objects of celebration. “Since worship of fleshly things produces pleasure,” he said, “there would then be a temple of glorious indulgence. .” The Satanic Bible Anton Szandor LaVey For Diane Dedications To: Bernadino Logara, who knew the value of money Karl Haushofer, a teacher without a classroom Rasputin, who knew the magic of a child Sir Basil Zaharoff, a gentleman Cagliostro, a rogue Barnabas Saul, the link with Mount Lalesh Ragnar Redbeard, whose might is right William Mortensen, who looked .
    [Show full text]
  • After School Satan: Mimicry and Counteridentity As Strategies for Religious Resistance Lacey Corey Brown Southern Illinois University Carbondale
    Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitative Communication Research Volume 17 Article 6 2018 After School Satan: Mimicry and Counteridentity as Strategies for Religious Resistance Lacey Corey Brown Southern Illinois University Carbondale Follow this and additional works at: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/kaleidoscope Recommended Citation Brown, Lacey Corey (2018) "After School Satan: Mimicry and Counteridentity as Strategies for Religious Resistance," Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitative Communication Research: Vol. 17 , Article 6. Available at: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/kaleidoscope/vol17/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitative Communication Research by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. After School Satan: Mimicry and Counteridentity as Strategies for Religious Resistance Cover Page Footnote Lacey Corey Brown is currently a PhD candidate in the Communication Studies Department at Southern Illinois University. This paper was previously present at the 2017 National Communication Association convention, Dallas, TX. The uthora would like to thank Michael Forst, and the reviewers for their critiques and recommendations. This article is available in Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitative Communication Research: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ kaleidoscope/vol17/iss1/6 After School Satan: Mimicry and Counteridentity as Strategies for Religious Resistance Lacey Corey Brown Southern Illinois University Carbondale The Satanic Temple strategically constructs their identity using counteridentifying symbols, such as Satan, to metaphorically resist Christian dogma in the context of U.S. American law and popular opinion. Through mimicry, they use faith as a tool of resistance to challenge the presence of The Good News Club, an Evangelical student program, in public schools.
    [Show full text]
  • The Devil's Music
    religions Article The Devil’s Music: Satanism and Christian Rhetoric in the Lyrics of the Swedish Heavy Metal Band Ghost P.C.J.M. (Jarell) Paulissen Department of Biblical Sciences and Church History, Tilburg School of Catholic Theology, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands; [email protected] Abstract: This paper is an inquiry into a contemporary heavy metal band from Sweden called Ghost. Ghost released its first studio album in 2010 and, while there is some discussion as to what their genre is exactly, they immediately became a rising star in the metal scene. Yet what is of particular interest from a storytelling point of view, especially with regard to theological answers to philosophical questions in popular culture, is that the band presents itself as a satanic version of the Catholic Church through their stage act and lyrics. This made me curious whether they are trying to convey a message and, if yes, what that message might be. For the present paper, I have focused on the latter by performing a non-exhaustive textual analysis of the lyrics in a selection of songs from each of the four studio albums released so far. Ghost turns Christian liturgy on its head by utilizing devout language that is normally reserved for God and Christ to describe Satan and the Antichrist, a strategy I have called the ”satanification” of Christian doctrine, and in doing so their songs evoke imagery of a satanic faith community at prayer. The band then uses this radical inversion of traditional Christian themes to criticize certain elements of society, especially those aspects they associate with organized religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Wells's Thesis
    Confronting the Constitutional Order: Reconciling Satan and the Free Exercise of Religion Julia Wells Honors Defense Date: May 8, 2020 Thesis Advisor: Professor Jenna Reinbold Defense Committee: Professor Christopher Vecsey Professor Benjamin Stahlberg 1 In defending the separation of church and state, James Madison wrote, “The Religion…of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man; and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate.”1 The crux of Madison’s argument was that if the government were allowed to interfere in people’s religious choices, the government would be able to choose or remove people’s religious practices at will. In Madison's conception, one's freedom of conscience precedes one's commitment to the government, and therefore shouldn't be within the power of government to regulate. Since the founding of the United States, religious freedom has been one of the most venerated values, but determining which religions are afforded religious freedom has historically been very contentious. This principle of freedom of conscience was translated into the U.S. Constitution in the form of the very first words of the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”2 The establishment clause prevents the government from creating a state church, while the free exercise clause limits the government’s ability to force people to act in violation of their religion. Limiting government engagement with religion is difficult everywhere, but it is especially difficult for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Doe Ex Rel. Satan?: Parody, Religious Liberty, & Reproductive Rights
    46 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF GENDER AND LAW 40.1 MARY DOE EX REL. SATAN?: PARODY, RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, & REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS CHRISTEN E. HAMMOCK* Abstract In 2015, a woman known as “Mary Doe” challenged a Missouri abortion restriction requiring her to wait seventy-two hours after receiving certain “informed consent” materials before she could obtain an abortion. Mary Doe challenged the restrictions in federal and state court on religious grounds as a member of the Satanic Temple. This paper examines the Satanic Temple’s litigation through the lens of parody—a literary technique that involves repeating another text’s form or content in order to critique it. Mary Doe’s litigation mirrored that of Hobby Lobby v. Burwell, in which a for-profit corporation claimed a religious accommodation from the ACA’s contraceptive mandate. The litigation forces two comparisons—between mainstream religious beliefs and other strongly held matters of conscience, and between abortion and other constitutional claims—and illuminates the “distortions” that often appear in reproductive rights litigation. INTRODUCTION In 2015, a woman known as Mary Doe challenged an amendment to Missouri’s statute governing informed consent for abortion. The amendment instituted a seventy- two-hour waiting period and required providers to distribute printed materials stating that “the life of each human being begins at conception. Abortion will terminate the life of a separate, unique, living human being.”1 Doe’s lawsuit took a unique approach to challenging Missouri’s abortion restrictions. Instead of alleging that the law violated Equal Protection or constituted an “undue burden” under Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Agenda Wednesday, April 14, 2021 5:00 PM Via Teleconference
    CITY OF OAKLAND REDISTRICTING COMMISSION (REGULAR MEETING) Meeting Agenda Wednesday, April 14, 2021 5:00 PM Via Teleconference Redistricting Commissioners: Benjie Achtenberg, Amber Blackwell, Daniel Chesmore (Alternate), Gloria Crowell, Lilibeth Gangas, Shirley Gee, Stephanie Goode, Masoud Hamidi, Paul Marshall, Tracy Richmond McKnight, Diana Miller, Tejal Shah, Jan Stevens, and Mary Velasco. Commission website: www.oaklandca.gov/redistricting Pursuant to the Governor's Executive Order N-29-20, Redistricting Commissioners, as well as City staff, will participate via phone/video conference, and no physical teleconference locations are required. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The Oakland Redistricting Commission encourages public participation in the online board meetings. The public may observe and/or participate in this meeting in several ways. OBSERVE: • To observe the meeting by video conference, please click on this link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86125067929 at the noticed meeting time. Instructions on how to join a meeting by video conference are available at: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/201362193, which is a webpage entitled “Joining a Meeting” • To listen to the meeting by phone, please call the numbers below at the noticed meeting time: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): +1 669 900 9128 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799. For each number, please be patient and when requested, dial the following Webinar ID: 861 2506 7929. After calling any of these phone numbers, if you are asked for a participant ID or code, press #.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Today, Satan: Re-Examining Viewpoint Discrimination in the Limited Public Forum
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 26 (2017-2018) Issue 4 Article 9 May 2018 Not Today, Satan: Re-examining Viewpoint Discrimination in the Limited Public Forum Daniel Cutler Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Repository Citation Daniel Cutler, Not Today, Satan: Re-examining Viewpoint Discrimination in the Limited Public Forum, 26 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1241 (2018), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol26/ iss4/9 Copyright c 2018 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj NOT TODAY, SATAN: RE-EXAMINING VIEWPOINT DISCRIMINATION IN THE LIMITED PUBLIC FORUM Daniel Cutler* INTRODUCTION ................................................1241 I. SATANISM .................................................1245 A. The Satanic Temple ......................................1246 B. After School Satan .......................................1248 II. LEGAL BACKGROUND ........................................1250 A. Viewpoint Discrimination in Limited Public Forums.............1250 B. Good News Club v. Milford Central School...................1252 III. THE FIRST AMENDMENT AS APPLIED TO AFTER SCHOOL SATAN .......1255 A. Prohibiting After School Satan in Public Schools Is Unconstitutional Based on the Good News Club Precedent .....................1255 B. After School Satan as an Opportunity to Re-examine Viewpoint Discrimination in Limited Public Forums .....................1259 1. Abandoning Public Forum Analysis for Public Schools .......1262 2. Public Schools as Limited Public Forums with Added Deference Granted to Public School Administrators ..................1263 CONCLUSION ..................................................1265 INTRODUCTION In 2016, the Satanic Temple (the “Temple”) announced an after-school program1 that was sure to disturb the parents of public school students across the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred & Profane Season 3, Episode 3 the Devil's Advocates
    Sacred & Profane Season 3, Episode 3 The Devil’s Advocates [00:00:01] Kurtis Schaeffer I'm Kurtis Schaeffer, [00:00:02] Martien Halvorson-Taylor and I'm Martien Halvorson-Taylor, and this is sacred and profane, a show where we explore how religions shape us and how we shape religions. [00:00:14] Kurtis Schaeffer And our story today, like so many other unexpected headlines, starts in Florida. [00:00:22] News tape An ironic twist of support for Florida Governor Rick Scott. [00:00:28] In 2013, Scott championed a law that many saw as an end run against long standing Supreme Court rulings that banned prayer in public schools. [00:00:39] Joseph Laycock Of course, the Supreme Court has said that you cannot have compulsory prayer in schools. [00:00:44] Martien Halvorson-Taylor That's Joseph Laycock. [00:00:46] Joseph Laycock I am Joseph Laycock and I'm an associate professor of religious studies at Texas State University. [00:00:51] Martien Halvorson-Taylor Back in 2013, he was covering religion as a reporter for Religion Dispatches. [00:00:58] Joseph Laycock So Gov. Rick Scott in Florida passed a law basically running an angle around this and saying, well, the teachers cannot lead prayer, but students can lead other students in prayer and they can use the resources of the school to do that. And clearly, they had Christian prayers in mind. This is how we're going to get the Christian God back into public schools. [00:01:19] Kurtis Schaeffer Florida Scott's bill drew support from Christian conservatives, but it also drew the attention of a group few people had heard of.
    [Show full text]
  • The Devils Creamerie
    THE DEVILS CREAMERIE REVOLT OF THE ANGELS EDUCATIONAL ASSET — OREGON — LA RÉVOLTE DES ANGES MATÉRIEL PÉDAGOGIQUE — OREGON — Copyright © 2020 Friends of the Satanic Temple Oregon Front Cover by Lor Ipsum Back cover art by Luke Fomley Layout by Lor Ipsum Excerpt from Revolt of the Angels by Anatole France All rights reserved. This project was originally imagined to satisfy a requirement to become an official chapter in The Satanic Temple. However, it quickly grew into more than that for those involved. In these pages, you will find a wide spectrum of topics, perspectives, and even mediums. The only thing we asked of our members was that they allowed themselves to become inspired by the book – other than that, anything goes. It is our hope that because of this approach, there is at least one thing within these pages that will resonate with every TST Satanist. It is also our hope that our project will inspire those who have not yet read Revolt, to finally read it. We do not speak for The Satanic Temple. These are only the thoughts, reflections, and creative endeavors of our “Friends of” group, Friends of TST Oregon. INFERNAL THANKS Siri Sanguine, Dex Desjardins, Damion Luciano, Brady Bonney, Lauren “LURN” Appel, Jesse Bee, Lilith Starr, and Viktor LaMent. We wouldn’t be here without your help and inspiration. CONTENTS France’s Revolving Revolutions Timeline – Alse Libertas ������������������� 2 Angelic Hierarchy – Elysa Elmore ������������������������������������������������������� 7 Family Tree – Elysa Elmore ���������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    No. IN THE Supreme Court of the United States PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Printed with FinePrint trial version - purchase at www.fineprint.com i QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is the Establishment Clause violated by the proclamation in an abortion statute that “The life of each human being begins at conception. Abortion will terminate the life of a separate, unique, living human being?” 2. Can a State constitutionally compel a woman seeking an abortion to acknowledge receipt of the proclamation “The life of each human being begins at conception. Abortion will terminate the life of a separate, unique, living human being” as a condition for getting an abortion when her religious belief is the non- viable fetus is not a human being but rather part of her body that can, in good conscience, be removed on demand without regard to its current or future condition? 3. Can a State can constitutionally compel a woman seeking an abortion to submit to a three day waiting period whose only purpose is to promote her consideration of the State’s proclamation that “The life of each human being begins at conception. Abortion will terminate the life of a separate, unique, living human being” when her religious belief is the non-viable fetus is not a human being but rather part of her body that can, in good conscience, be removed on demand without regard to its current or future condition? 4. Does the undue burden analysis of Planned Parenthood of Se. Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) (“Casey”) or the rational basis analysis of Employment Div., Dep't of Human Res.
    [Show full text]