Tire Stewardship
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
the road to rubber recyygcling: product stewardship for tires an expert panel discussion via web conference . february 19, 2014 1 the issue’s been around for years. 2 advanced disposal fees 3 top 5 waste management problems 4 multi‐stakeholder meeting: tire stewardship 5 TDF plant closure 6 michael kimberly blumenthal del castillo rubber city of del rio manuftfacturers texas association jennifer andrew holliday horsman chittenden solid ontario tire waste district stewardship 7 webinar logistics! 8 DO NOT use the ‘raise hand’ function! got a question? here’s how to ask it. DO use the ‘questions’ box! 9 10 a note to our friends in the media: contact information for follow‐up interviews will be available at the end of the webinar. 11 12 please welcome our 1st guest speaker: mihichael blumenth al vice president | rubber manufacturers association (RMA) 13 Shdhared Product Responsiblbility: A Case Study of the U.S. Tire Industry’s Efforts Michael Blumenthal PSI Webinar February 19, 2014 14 RMA Tire Company Members 15 RMA Key Activities Tire safety and performance Scrap tire management Policy and advocacy Industry technical standards Industry statistics 16 RMA Perspective on Product Stewardship Committed to shared responsibility – through free‐market approach Development of sustainable markets Creation of effective state laws to address stockpile abatement, regulations and enforcement Information clearinghouse – technical data in support of markets Coordination among EPA, states, scrap tire processors and end‐ users 17 Quick History of U.S. Scrap Tire Management Today • Congressional interest 1990 has long since waned •48 states had scrap tire •RMA recognized as laws or regulations of leading source of some kind information on all scrap 1988‐1989 • 1990: 11% of scrap tires tire issues went to end‐use market • Scrap tire markets have •National focus on (TDF) increased to over 80% of recycling –Congress •EPA stated there were 2‐3 scrap tires generated considering laws on billion tires in stockpiles in •Over 90% of all stockpiles secondary materials the US have been abated 1985 ildiincluding tires •RMA formed Scrap Tire •RMA leadership Management Counsel to continues Minnesota was the promote scrap tire first state to enact markets scrap tire legislation and regulations 18 RMA Leadership Technical publications Standards Development Public Cooperation •Air emissions report on •ASTM standards for •Actively engaged in TDF ground rubber Border 2012/2020 •Reports on lhleachate •ASTM standddards for TDF •Working with FHWA on from scrap tires in civil & TDA TDA & rubber modified engineering applications •ASTM standards for asphalt markets •Reports characterizing playground cover, mulch • Working the scrap tire & infill material w/Transportation marketplace Research Board (TRB) to •Report on the advance use of prevention and fighting sustainable materials of tire fires ((yrecycled materials) in • Compendium of scrap highway and road tire terms construction 19 U.S. Scrap Tire Disposition 2011 Thousands of Market of Disposition Millions of Tires % change 2009‐2011 Tons Tire‐DidDerived FlFuel 1427.03 87.08 ‐31.5% Ground Rubber 928.50 56.66 ‐20.2% Civil Engineering 294.99 18.00 3.5% Exported 302.48 18.46 196.3% Electric Arc Furnace 65.55 4.00 141.9% Reclamation Projects 54.29 3.31 ‐58.2% Agricultural 7.10 0.43 0.0% Baled Tires/market 1.92 0.12 0.0% Punched/ Stamped 1.90 0.12 0.0% Total to Market 3235.89 197.45 ‐17.4% Generated 3781.03 230.72 ‐17.7% % to Market/Utilized 81.6% 81.6% N/A Land Disposed 491.65 30.00 ‐24.8% Baled/no market 32.78 2.00 110.5% % Managed (includes Markets, 95.4% 95.4% N/A Baled and Landfill) Processor Inventory/Unknown 4.6% 4.6% N/A 20 U.S. Scrap Tire Trends 2005 ‐ 2011 6000.0 100.0% 89.3% 85.3% 82.0% 81.6% 5000.0 4595.7 4595.5 80.0% 4410.7 4105.8 ss 3917.7 4000.0 3781.0 3616.1 Ton 60.0% of 3083.8 Utilized 3000.0 nds nt aa ee 40.0% 2000.0 Perc Thous 20.0% 1000. 0 0.0 0.0% 2005 2007 2009 2011 Total to Market Total Generated Market % 21 U.S. Stockpiled Scrap Tires 1990 ‐ 2011 1200.00 1100.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 900.00 800.00 685.39 700.00 Tires of 600.00 s nn 509.98 500.00 Millio 400.00 308.45 300.00 271.79 180.36 142.27 200.00 127.60 125.04 100.00 76.73 0000.00 22 U.S. Scrap Tire Stockpiles 2013 23 RMA Resources Guidance on key components of successful laws and regulations for scrap tires Educational and technical information on key markets •TDF • Ground rubber • Civil engineering Participation in and leadership on stakeholders groups Extensive RMA library available on RMA website 24 Keys to Success Building a Successful Scrap Tire Program Industry Effective state Supportive involvement in regulations government public policy and agencies development enforcement 25 Scrap Tire Realities Effective state programs, Factors that hdhinder successful systems progress 26 Conclusions U.S. approach to scrap tires works •Increase in markets and decrease in stockpile since 1990 •U.S. based tire manufacturers have been actively since 1990 Effectiveness of State Programs Impacts Success • Should focus on market development, stockpile abatement, and developing and enforcing regulations • Subsidizing scrap tire hauling or processing will inhibit development of stable, sustainable markets Scrap tire solutions as varied as markets •Focus must be on developing, expanding and protecting the major markets for scrap tires •Tire manufacturers remain committed to working with all stakeholders 27 Thank you! Michael Blumenthal Vice President Rubber Manufacturers Association [email protected] 28 please welcome our 2nd guest speaker: kimb erl y dldel castillo recycling coordinator| city of del rio, texas 29 CITY OF DEL RIO PSI Tire Stewardship Presentation Kimberly del Castillo 2/19/2014 30 31 • Education • Partnerships • Maintenance 32 Tire Disposal Fees $2.28 ‐ Small Tires: 16” and Smaller $5.70 –Truck Tires: 16”‐24.5” When Problems Occur 1. Verbal Notification (if possible) 2. Written Notification 3. Letters 4. Citation 5. Bill of Charges 33 Education A focused approach in bringing services to one section of our community at a time, working with our citizens to enhance their quality of life in their own neighborhoods. This project brings together elected officials, county and city staff, the local business community, law enforcement and fire protection, the school district and higher learning institutions, and the health care community to prov ide in forma tion tha t w ill en hance the quality of life for our community, focusing on one neighborhood at a time. 34 Education The Green City Initiative was created out of a need to build environmental awareness and cooperation among citizens and leaders in our community. The Green City Initiative is driven by City Council Members, businesses and Del Rio citizens who are inspired to keep Del Rio clean and beautiful. 35 PARTNERSHIPS • On a regular basis the City of Del Rio and Val Verde County work with property owners to clean up and eradicate dump sites and tire removal. • The City of Del Rio will host and sponsor community events that bring services to citizens to help them with their clean up efforts. • Working with the Solid Waste Advisory Committee to provide solutions for the region. • With the help of Bridgestone the City of Del Rio was able to remove 802 abandoned tires during the City of Del Rio One‐Community Event in 2013. We will be working with them again for a Tire Sweep in April 2014. 36 THANK YOU 37 please welcome our 3rd guest speaker: jifjennifer hollid ay product stewardship manager| chittenden solid waste district president, board of directors | psi 38 39 THE ROAD TO RUBBER RECYCLING: PRODUCT STEWARDSHIP FOR TIRES Jen Holliday Chittenden Solid Waste District (CSWD) Vermont Pro duc t Stewar ds hip Counc il (VTPSC) Product Stewardship Institute (PSI) Webinar 2/2014 40 Chittenden Solid Waste District • 18 member cities and towns • Population 156,000 • Annual operating budget ~ $9,000,000 41 Vermont Product Stewardship Council VTPSC Members About VTPSC • Addison County Solid Waste Management Distr ict • October 2008 • Chittenden Solid Waste District • Voting Members - Local • Mad River Resource Management Alliance • Greater Upper Valley Solid Waste District Government • Lamoille Solid Waste District • Membership represents 85% • Northwest Solid Waste District • Central Vermont Solid Waste District of Vermont Population • Northeast Kingdom Solid Waste District • Solid Waste Alliance Communities • Partners – VT Agency of • Southern Windsor/Windham Counties Solid Natural Resources Waste District • Rutland Solid Waste District • Londonderry Solid Waste Group • Bennington Regional Planning Commission 42 VT EPR Laws • 2008 Mercury-Containing Thermostats • 2010 Electronic Waste • 2011 Mercury-Containing Lamps • 2013 Paint • 2014 Primary Batteries (bill not law) 43 VTPSC Product Evaluation Tool • #1 Household Hazardous Waste • #2 Tires • #3 Primary Batteries • #4 Pesticides 44 VTPSC Product Evaluation Tool • Cost • Environmental/Human Health • Resource Consumption/Market • Public, Producer and /or Political Interest 45 Tire Management in Vermont • Estimated 625,000 scrap tires generated annually • Landfill ban • Most managed through tire dealers or Solid Waste Districts/municipalities • Cost bb$etween $2-$4 each for p assen ger car 46 VT Scrap Tire Pile Inventory In 2012 the Legislature required the DEC to inventory the number of scrap tire piles in the state, estimate the number of total tires in the piles, and the cost to remediate the piles. 62 tire piles that had over 100 tires each were reported or were known to exist. 19 of these were field verified. Because the piles’ sizes were reporte d within ranges, the to ta l number was estimated between 417,000 and 458,000 tires.