28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
K&L Defendants. AFTG-TG LLC;andPHILLIPM.ADAMS, ASSOCIATES, LLC; PHILLIP M.ADAMS& Plaintiffs, INCORPORATED; AMERICA andAOPEN INCORPORATED AOPEN (AMERICA) CORPORATION; TECHNOLOGY INFOCOMM WISTRON and (TEXAS)CORPORATION; INFOCOMM WISTRON CORPORATION; WISTRON AMERICAINCORPORATED AOPEN AND INCORPORATED AOPEN (AMERICA) CORPORATION, TECHNOLOGY INFOCOMM WISTRON (TEXAS)CORPORATION, INFOCOMM WISTRON CORPORATION, WISTRON Attorneys for Plaintiffs Facsimile: (650)798-6701 Telephone: (650)798-6700 Palo Alto,CA 94304 630 HansenWay LLP K&L GATES [email protected] Jeffrey M.Ratinoff(SBN197241) Facsimile: 415.882.8220 Telephone: 415.882.8200 San Francisco,California94111 Four Embarcadero Center,Suite1200 [email protected] Rachel Davidson(SBN215517) [email protected] Harold H.Davis,Jr.(SBN235552) [email protected] Howard Chen(SBN257393)
GATES Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page1of13 vs. Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju LLP
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OFCALIFORNIA DISTRICT NORTHERN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICTCOURT UNITED STATES SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SAN FRANCISCO Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC
dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity 7,366,804; AND7,653,766 6,691,181; 7,249,203;7,472,207;6,842,802; 6,687,858; 7,251,752;7,069,475;7,409,601; U.S. PATENTNOS.5,983,002;6,401,222; INFRINGEMENT ANDINVALIDITYOF DECLARATORY JUDGMENTOFNON- FOR COMPLAINT SECOND AMENDED Case No.3:10-CV-04458-EMC
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
subsidiary of AOpen Inc. andisa leading manufac subsidiary ofAOpenInc. business at2890Zanker Road,Suite101SanJose, equipment. manufacturing andsellingcomputer productssuch No.68, RuiguangRd.,NeihuDistrict,Taipei,Taiwa subsidiary ofWistron Corp.andprovidesWistron 800 ParkerSquare,Suite285A,FlowerMound,Texa which Wistron Corp.wastheoriginalmanufacturer. Corp.andprovidesaf owned subsidiaryofWistron place ofbusinessat4051 FreeportParkway,Suite Infocomm Corporation(“SMS”or“Wistron Texas”) products aresoldinthisDistrict. other electronicproductsforcustomers tosell manufacturing computer productssuchasnotebo technology (“ICT”)products.Wistron Corp.is of theworld’slargest original 21F, 88,Sec.1,HsinTaiWu. Rd.,Hs America”) (collectively “AOpen”);byandth (“AOpen INCORPORATED AMERICA (“AOpenInc.”),andAOPEN INCORPORATED CORPORATION (“Wistron Ameri andWIST (TEXAS) CORPORATION; Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page2of13 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.
Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju Plaintiff AOpenAmerica is aCalifornia Plaintiff AOpenInc.isaTaiwancorporat Plaintiff Wistron America isa Plaintiff Wistron Infocomm (Texas)Cor Plaintiff Wistron Corp.isa Plaintiffs WISTRON CORPORATION (“ Plaintiffs WISTRONCORPORATION designmanufacturers ca”) (collectively“Wistron”); andPlaintiffs AOPEN ichih, TaipeiHsien221,Taiwan, Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC RON INFOCOMM TECHNOLOGY (AMERICA) (AMERICA) RON INFOCOMMTECHNOLOGY THE PARTIES Taiwan corporationwithitsprincipal place of businessat rough theirattorneys allegeasfollows: Texas corporation withitspr under theirown brandnames.Wistron Corp.’s in thebusinessofdesigning,developingand ok computers, computer peripheralequipment and 200,Grapevine,Texas76051.SMSisawholly- 2 asnotebookcomputers andcomputer peripheral customers inNorthAmeric turer ofultrasmall-form-factor (uSFF) computer ter-sales repairandse CA 95134.AOpenAmerica isawhollyowned n, ROC.AOpenInc.isinthebusinessof (“ODM”) forinformation andcommunication dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity and isaTexascorporat s 75028.Wistron America isawholly-owned poration haschangeditsname toSMS corporation with its ion withitsprincipalplaceofbusinessat Wistron Corp.”),WISTRON INFOCOMM
R.O.C. Wistron Corp.isone rvicing ofproductsfor incipal placeofbusinessat principal placeof ion withitsprincipal a withsalessupport.
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
same claimed devices,systems, methods andtechnologies. the PMAApatentsandAFTG arefrom thesame patentfamily orfamilies and/or relate to the aforementioned patentstoAFTG(“thepatents”). informed andbelieve,basedthereonallege patent”); 7,366,804(“the‘804and7,653,766(“ ‘181 patent”);7,249,203(“the‘203 patents toPMAA (“thePMAApatents”). and believe,basedthereonallege,thatDr. 7,069,475 (“the‘475patent”);and7, patent”); 6,401,222(“the‘2226,687,858(“th alter egosof Dr. Adams. both PMAAandAFTG,thatAFTG andPMAAfunc informed andbelieve,basedthereonallege,that Defendant PhillipM.Adams (“Dr.Adams”) isaNe at 325NFederalHeightsCircle,Sa “D and AFTG(collectively Defendant AFTG-TGL.L.C.(“AFTG has analternativeaddressat liability company withanaddressat325Federal components andcustomizable platforms a Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page3of13 12. 11. 10. 9. 13. 8. 7.
Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju Wistron andAOpenfurtherareinformed a Dr. Adams isalsolistedastheinventor Dr. Adams islistedas the inventorof Wistron andAOpenareinformed andbe Wistron andAOpenfilethis SecondAme Wistron andAOpenareinformed andbe Defendant PhillipM.Adams &Associates efendants”) pursuanttothe patentla P.O. Box1207,Bountiful,Utah84011. JURISDICTION ANDVENUE JURISDICTION lt LakeCity,Utah84103. 409,601 (“the‘601patent”).Wistron andAOpenareinformed ”) isnowaWyoming limited liab Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC nd adigitalsignagesolutionprovider. 7,472,207 (“the‘207patent”);6,842,802‘802 Adams hasassignedownershipoftheaforementioned that Dr.Adamshasassi Heights Circle,SaltLa 3 vada resident.Wistron andAOpenarefurther Dr.Adams istheprincipalownerandheadof dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity United StatesPatentNos.5,983,002(“the‘002 ofUnitedStatesPatentNos.6,691,181(“the e ‘858patent”);7,251,752(“the‘752 lieve, andbasedthereonallege,that lieve, andbasedthereonallege,that nded Complaint againstDr.Adams, PMAA the ‘766patent”).Wistron andAOpenare tion aspatentholdingcompanies and arethe nd believe,andbasedthereonallege,that , L.L.C.(“PMAA”)isaUtahlimited
ws oftheUnitedStates, Title 35of
gned ownershipofthe ility company withanaddress ke City,Utah84103.PMAA
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
California because Wistron, AOpenand Defendants declaratory judgment inthefederalcourts the UnitedStates Code,withaspecificremedy s AOpen productsinfringe oneormore claims ofth bearing licenseforthePMAA andAFTGpatents. States. of disruptingthesaleWistron andAOpenproduc baseless patentinfringement lawsuitagainst Wist Defendants embarked uponanimproper campaign ofthreatsagainstWistron andAOpentofilea §§ 2201and2202. the patents-in-suit inand directedatcompan alleged infringersasrequiredbysuchlicenseag companies basedinCaliforniaand thisDistrict,as services, negotiatingandente transacted andcontinuetotransa give risetothisactionoccurre Wistron andAOpenresideand/ordobusinessinthis §§ 1391and1400(b).Uponinformation andbelief, Declaratory Judgment Act,28U.S.C.§§2201and2202. patent lawsoftheUnitedStat Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page4of13 16. 17. 14. 19. 18. 15.
Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju This actionisproperlyfiledintheSanFran There isanactualcontrovers This Courthassubjectmatte Defendants haverepeatedly demanded that On oraroundJune21,2010,inletterssenttoWistron andAOpen, respectively, Personal jurisdictionandvenueareproperin EXISTENCE OFANACTUALCONTROVERSY EXISTENCE ring into licensingagreements forsome es, pursuantto28U.S.C.§§1331,1338(a),andundertheFederal d inthisDistrict.Upon inform INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT INTRADISTRICT ct business inCalifornia and this Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC oftheUnitedStates,28U.S.C.§§2201and2202. r jurisdictionover y withinthejurisdictionof ies basedinCaliforniaandthisDistrict. reements, andparticipatinginlitigationconcerning ought baseduponthelawsauthorizingactionsfor ron andAOpen forthepurpose,andintendedeffect, 4 e PMAA and AFTG patents, and havetoldWistron e PMAAandAFTGpatents, serting some orallofth Defendants areclaiming th ts, includingnotebookcomputers, intheUnited Defendants conductbusinessinthisDistrict, Defendants do business withinthe SanFranciscoDivision. dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity District, andasubstantialpartoftheeventsthat Wistron andAOpenenterintoaroyalty- cisco DivisionoftheNo thisDistrictpursuantto28U.S.C. ation and belief, Defendants have andbelief,Defendants ation this action,whicharisesunderthe District byprovidi
or allof thepatents-in-suit with thisCourtunder28U.S.C. e patents-in-suit against
at certainWistron and rthern Districtof ng consulting
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Exhibit A. See including butnotlimited totestingof Defendants’ computer chips,motherboards, computers andot through, among otheractivities,the purportedly “infringed various claimsofeachthe computer systems. as wellapparatuses,systems andmethodsforprev that detectandaddresstherandom de collectivelydisclose the PMAAandAFTGpatents AFTG patents. Action”). A trueandcorrectcopyoftheComplain AOpen America, intheUnitedStat thirty-five defendants,includingWistron Corp.,Wi declaratory judgment ofnon-in and AOpenwereindependentlyliableforthe respectively, allegingthatWistron andAOpenma companies suchasLenovo, Dell,Asus,Fujitsuandthelike. several ofthepatents-in-suitwereallegedagains previously-filed may besubject tosubstantialliabilities. and AOpenthatiftheydonottakelicensesto ExhibitAat¶52. Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page5of13 24. 25. 23. 22. 21. 20.
Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju In theWyoming Action,Defendantsasserted In theWyoming Action,Defendantsalso On October18,2010,DefendantsfiledaCompla On October1,2010,Wistron Corp. andAOpen sentletters toWistronOn oraroundAugust20,2010,Defendants andAOpen, As partofitsimproper campaign, referred Defendants Wistron andAOpentothe See Lenovo ExhibitAat¶¶1-2,52.Thecomplaint f See ExhibitAat¶¶3-6. case, Case No. 1:05-cv-64 TX-DN (D. case, CaseNo.1:05-cv-64TX-DN(D. fringement andinvalidityof, es DistrictCourtforthe ofWyoming (“theWyoming manufacture, use,importation, saleand/orofferforof struction orcorruptionofdatain Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC infringement ofthePMAAandAFTGpatents. thePMAAandAFTGpate t othercomputer manufacturers andcomputer brand her products,aswellusing infringingmethods 5 nufactured infringingproduc products asapartofth t intheWyoming Actionis stron Texas,Wistron America, AOpenInc.and computer hardwareandsoftwaretechnologies patents-in-suit inviola dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity enting datacorruptionduetotime-gap defectsin allege thatthenamed defendantshave all of thePMAApate inter alia, iled intheWyoming Actionallegesthat filed theinstantactionseekinga filed Utah), inwhichinfringement of int forPatentInfringement against diskdrivesusedbycomputers, the‘002and‘222patents. nts, Wistron andAOpen e manufacturing process.” tion of35U.S.C.§271 attachedheretoas ts andthatWistron nts andallofthe
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
/ alia is invalidbecauseitfails tosa Hewlett-Packard G70notebookcomputer. imported, offeredforsale,and/orsoldby Wistro enforceable claim ofthe ‘002patent isinfringed hereto asExhibitB. Controller Detection Apparatusand 1 through30andincorporatethem byreference. notice.” and/or constructivenoticeofthei jurisdiction ofthisCourtunder28U.S.C.§§2201and2202. controversy betweentheparties. shopping andtowrongfullydivestthisCourtof Defendants filedtheWyoming Actioninresponseto invalid and/orunenforceable. have infringedthePMAApatentsandAFTG , inSections101,102,103, and/or112ofTi Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page6of13 31. 34. 33. 32. 26. 27. 30. 29. 28. See
ExhibitAat¶53; Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju DECLARATORY JUDGMENTREGARDINGTHE‘002PATENT Wistron andAOpenherebyrestatereallege Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Dr. Adams istheinventor ofthe‘002pa Defendants furtherallegeintheWyoming Ac Wistron andAOpencategoricallydenyDefendant Based upontheabovefacts,thereisanactua Wistron andAOpenareinformed andbe Wistron andAOpenfurthercontendthat tisfy theconditionsandrequirement see also r infringement ofthepatents-in-s Method.” A trueandcorrectcopy Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC ¶¶16,54. FIRST CLAIM patents, willfullyorotherwise. patents, jurisdictiontohear tle 35oftheUnitedStates Code. n orAOpen,includingtheWistron-manufactured by Wistron or AOpen;byproductsmanufactured, 6 dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity the instantactionasameans forum ofimproper tent, entitled“DefectiveFloppyDiskette lieve, andbasedthereonallegethat, the PMAApatentsandAFTGare
ation anddeclaration ation anddeclarationthatnovalid l andjusticiablecont tion that“allDefendants havehadactual theallegationsset s’ allegationsthattheyinfringeor s for patentability assetforth, s forpatentability uit, includingactualprecomplaint the complete caseand of the‘002patentisattached roversy withinthe that the‘002patent forth inparagraphs
inter
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
alia is invalidbecauseitfailstosa Hewlett-Packard G70notebookcomputer. imported, offeredforsale,and/orsoldbyWistro enforceable claim ofthe‘222patent isinfringed hereto asExhibitC. Controller Detection Apparatusand 1 through34andincorporatethem byreference. / alia is invalidbecauseitfails tosa Hewlett-Packard G70notebookcomputer. imported, offeredforsale,and/orsoldby Wistro enforceable claim ofthe‘858 System.” Atrueandcorrectcopyofthe‘858 1 through38andincorporatethem byreference.
, inSections101,102,103,and/or112ofTi , inSections101,102,103, and/or112ofTi Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page7of13 38. 37. 35. 39. 36. 42. 41. 40.
Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju DECLARATORY JUDGMENTREGARDINGTHE‘222PATENT DECLARATORY JUDGMENTREGARDINGTHE‘858PATENT Wistron andAOpenseekajudicial determin Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Wistron andAOpenherebyrestatereallege Wistron andAOpenherebyrestatereallege Dr. Adams istheinventorof‘222pa Wistron andAOpenseek ajudicialdete Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Dr. Adams istheinventorof‘858
tisfy theconditionsandrequirement tisfy theconditionsandrequirement patent isinfringedbyWistron or Method.” A trueandcorrectcopy Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC SECOND CLAIM THIRD CLAIM
patent isattachedhere tle 35oftheUnitedStatesCode. tle 35oftheUnitedStates Code. n orAOpen,includingtheWistron-manufactured n orAOpen,includingtheWistron-manufactured by Wistron orAOpen;byproductsmanufactured, 7
dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity patent, entitled“Softw rmination anddeclar tent, entitled“DefectiveFloppyDiskette ation anddeclaration ation anddeclarationthatnovalid ation anddeclarationthatnovalid
theallegationsset theallegationsset AOpen;orbyproductsmanufactured, s for patentability assetforth, s forpatentability s for patentability assetforth, s forpatentability to asExhibitD. of the‘222patentisattached ation thatthe ‘858 are-Hardware Welding that the‘222patent forth inparagraphs forth inparagraphs
patent inter inter
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
alia is invalidbecauseitfailstosa Hewlett-Packard G70notebookcomputer. imported, offeredforsale,and/orsoldbyWistro enforceable claim ofthe‘752patent isinfringed as ExhibitE. Improvement ApparatusandMethod.”Atruecorre 1 through42andincorporatethem byreference. / alia is invalidbecauseitfails tosa Hewlett-Packard G70notebookcomputer. imported, offeredforsale,and/orsoldby Wistro enforceable claim ofthe ‘475patent isinfringed System.” Atrueandcorrectcopyofthe‘475 1 through46andincorporatethem byreference.
, inSections101,102,103,and/or112ofTi , inSections101,102,103, and/or112ofTi Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page8of13 46. 45. 43. 47. 44. 50. 49. 48.
Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju DECLARATORY JUDGMENTREGARDINGTHE‘752 DECLARATORY JUDGMENTREGARDINGTHE‘475PATENT Wistron andAOpenseekajudicial determin Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Wistron andAOpenherebyrestatereallege Wistron andAOpenherebyrestatereallege Dr. Adams istheinventorof‘752 Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Dr. Adams istheinventor ofthe‘475pa tisfy theconditionsandrequirement tisfy theconditionsandrequirement Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC FOURTH CLAIM FIFTH CLAIM patent isattachedheretoasExhibitF. tle 35oftheUnitedStatesCode. tle 35oftheUnitedStates Code. n orAOpen,includingtheWistron-manufactured n orAOpen,includingtheWistron-manufactured by Wistron orAOpen;byproductsmanufactured, by Wistron or AOpen;byproductsmanufactured, 8 dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity patent, entitled“Computerized Product tent, entitled“Software-HardwareWelding ct copyofthe‘752patent
ation anddeclaration ation anddeclarationthatnovalid ation anddeclaration ation anddeclarationthatnovalid
theallegationsset theallegationsset s for patentability assetforth, s forpatentability s for patentability assetforth, s forpatentability
PATENT that the‘752patent that the‘475patent forth inparagraphs forth inparagraphs isattachedhereto
inter inter
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
alia is invalidbecauseitfailstosa Hewlett-Packard G70notebookcomputer. imported, offeredforsale,and/orsoldbyWistro enforceable claim ofthe‘601patent isinfringed Exhibit G. Separation ApparatusandMethod.”A 1 through50andincorporatethem byreference. alia is invalidbecauseitfails tosa Hewlett-Packard G70notebookcomputer. imported, offeredforsale,and/orsoldby Wistro enforceable claim ofthe ‘181patent isinfringed hereto asExhibitH. Defect DetectionApparatusandMethod.”Atrue 1 through54andincorporatethem byreference.
, inSections101,102,103,and/or112ofTi , inSections101,102,103, and/or112ofTi Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page9of13 51. 55. 54. 53. 52. 58. 57. 56.
Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju DECLARATORY JUDGMENTREGARDINGTHE‘181PATENT DECLARATORY JUDGMENTREGARDINGTHE‘601 Wistron andAOpenherebyrestatereallege Wistron andAOpenherebyrestatereallege Wistron andAOpenseekajudicial determin Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Dr. Adams istheinventorof‘601 Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Dr. Adams istheinventor ofthe‘181 tisfy theconditionsandrequirement tisfy theconditionsandrequirement Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC true andcorrectcopyofthe‘601 SEVENTH CLAIM SEVENTH SIXTH CLAIM tle 35oftheUnitedStatesCode. tle 35oftheUnitedStates Code. n orAOpen,includingtheWistron-manufactured n orAOpen,includingtheWistron-manufactured by Wistron orAOpen;byproductsmanufactured, by Wistron or AOpen;byproductsmanufactured, 9 and correctcopyofthe‘181patentisattached patent,entitled“Read-Write Function dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity patent, entitled“ProgrammaticTime-Gap
ation anddeclaration ation anddeclarationthatnovalid ation anddeclaration ation anddeclarationthatnovalid
theallegationsset theallegationsset s for patentability assetforth, s forpatentability s for patentability assetforth, s forpatentability patent isattachedheretoas
PATENT that the‘601patent that the‘181patent forth inparagraphs forth inparagraphs
inter inter
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
alia is invalidbecauseitfailstosa Hewlett-Packard G70notebookcomputer. imported, offeredforsale,and/orsoldbyWistro enforceable claim ofthe‘203patent isinfringed Exhibit I. Detection ApparatusandMethod.”A 1 through58andincorporatethem byreference. alia is invalidbecauseitfails tosa Hewlett-Packard G70notebookcomputer. imported, offeredforsale,and/orsoldby Wistro enforceable claim ofthe ‘207patent isinfringed hereto asExhibitJ. Gap DefectDetectionApparatusand 1 through62andincorporatethem byreference.
, inSections101,102,103,and/or112ofTi , inSections101,102,103, and/or112of Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page10of13 59. 63. 62. 61. 60. 66. 65. 64.
Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju DECLARATORY JUDGMENTREGARDINGTHE‘203 DECLARATORY JUDGMENTREGARDINGTHE‘207 Wistron andAOpenherebyrestatereallege Wistron andAOpenherebyrestatereallege Wistron andAOpenseekajudicial determin Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Dr. Adams istheinventorof‘203 Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Dr. Adams istheinventor ofthe‘207pa tisfy theconditionsandrequirement tisfy theconditionsandrequirement Method.” Atrueandcorrectcopy Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC true andcorrectcopyofthe‘203 EIGHTH CLAIM NINTH CLAIM Title 35oftheUnitedStates Code. tle 35oftheUnitedStatesCode. n orAOpen,includingtheWistron-manufactured n orAOpen,includingtheWistron-manufactured by Wistron orAOpen; by Wistron or AOpen; 10 dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity patent, “Programmatic Time-Gap Defect tent, entitled“Optimized-Incrementing, Time- ation anddeclaration ation anddeclarationthatnovalid ation anddeclaration ation anddeclarationthatnovalid
theallegationsset theallegationsset s for patentability assetforth, s forpatentability s for patentability assetforth, s forpatentability patent isattachedheretoas of the‘207patentisattached by productsmanufactured, by productsmanufactured,
PATENT PATENT that the‘203patent that the‘207patent forth inparagraphs forth inparagraphs
inter inter
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
alia is invalidbecauseitfailstosa Hewlett-Packard G70notebookcomputer. imported, offeredforsale,and/orsoldbyWistro enforceable claim ofthe‘802patent isinfringed hereto asExhibitK. Defect CorrectionApparatusandMethod.”Atrue 1 through66andincorporatethem byreference. alia is invalidbecauseitfails tosa notebook computer. sale, and/orsoldbyWistron orAOpen,includi enforceable claim ofthe‘804patent isinfringe Exhibit L. Correction ApparatusandMethod.”A 1 through70andincorporatethem byreference.
, inSections101,102,103,and/or112ofTi , inSections101,102,103, and/or112ofTi Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page11of13 67. 71. 70. 69. 68. 74. 73. 72.
Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju DECLARATORY JUDGMENTREGARDINGTHE‘802 DECLARATORY JUDGMENTREGARDINGTHE‘804 Wistron andAOpenherebyrestatereallege Wistron andAOpenherebyrestatereallege Wistron andAOpenseekajudicial determin Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Dr. Adams istheinventorof‘802 Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Dr. Adams istheinventor ofthe‘804 tisfy theconditionsandrequirement tisfy theconditionsandrequirement Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC ELEVENTH CLAIM ELEVENTH true andcorrectcopyofthe‘804 TENTH CLAIM ng theWistron-manufactur d by productsmanufactured, imported, offered for tle 35oftheUnitedStatesCode. tle 35oftheUnitedStates Code. n orAOpen,includingtheWistron-manufactured by Wistron orAOpen;byproductsmanufactured, 11 and correctcopyofthe‘802patentisattached dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity patent, entitled“ProgrammaticTime-Gap patent, “Programmatic ation anddeclaration ation anddeclarationthatnovalid ation anddeclaration ation anddeclarationthatnovalid
theallegationsset theallegationsset
s for patentability assetforth, s forpatentability s for patentability assetforth, s forpatentability patent isattachedheretoas ed Hewlett-Packard G70 Time-Gap Defect
PATENT PATENT that the‘802patent that the‘804patent forth inparagraphs forth inparagraphs
inter inter
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
alia is invalidbecauseitfailstosa Hewlett-Packard G70notebookcomputer. imported, offeredforsale,and/orsoldbyWistro enforceable claim ofthe‘766patent isinfringed Apparatus andMethod.”Atrue 1 through74andincorporatethem byreference. / / / / Wistron andAOpentheirattorneys’ feesa Wistron andAOpeninfringethePMAAAFTGpatents; patents arevalid,enforceable,or prosecuting orinstituting and anypersonsinactiveconcertor infringed byWistron andAOpen or , inSections101,102,103,and/or112ofTi Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page12of13 75. 78. 77. 76. . Ajudgment declaringthiscaseexcep 3. DeclaringthatDefendantsa 2. Declaringthatnovalidandenforceable 1. WHEREFORE, Wistron andAOpenpr
Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju DECLARATORY JUDGMENTREGARDINGTHE‘766 Wistron andAOpenherebyrestatereallege Wistron andAOpenseekajudicial determin Wistron andAOpenseekajudicialdetermin Dr. Adams istheinventorof‘766pa any action against Wistron andAOpenclaimingany actionagainstWistron thatthePMAA andAFTG tisfy theconditionsandrequirement infringed, orfromrepresentingth bytheirproductsorservices; participation withthem berest correct copyofthe‘766patentis PRAYER FOR RELIEF PRAYER FOR Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC TWELFTH CLAIM TWELFTH nd costsinconnection nd their officers,employees,ag ay for judgment asfollows: tle 35oftheUnitedStatesCode. n orAOpen,includingtheWistron-manufactured by Wistron orAOpen;byproductsmanufactured, 12 tional under35U.S.C.§285andawarding dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity claim is ofthePMAAandAFTGpatents tent, entitled“Time-Gap DefectDetection ation anddeclaration ation anddeclarationthatnovalid
theallegationsset
with this case;and s for patentability assetforth, s forpatentability at theproductsorservicesof rained andenjoined from further attachedhereto ents, alteregos, attorneys,
PATENT that the‘766patent forth inparagraphs asExhibitM.
inter
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
JeffreyM.Ratinoff(SBN197241) By: and proper. ae: a 7 01 K&LGATES Dated: May27,2011 Case3:10-cv-04458-EMC Document36Filed05/27/11Page13of13 . AwardingWistron andAOpensuchothera 4. Second Amended Complaint forDeclaratory Ju Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC 13 AMERICAINCORPORATED AOPEN AND INCORPORATED AOPEN (AMERICA) CORPORATION, TECHNOLOGY INFOCOMM WISTRON (TEXAS)CORPORATION, INFOCOMM WISTRON CORPORATION, WISTRON Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/Jeffrey M.Ratinoff dgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity nd further relief asth LLP
e Courtdeems just