Interlining and Codeshare Agreements Explained

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Interlining and Codeshare Agreements Explained Interlining and Codeshare Agreements Explained Before we can discuss Interlining and Code Share agreements, you must first understand a few common terms used: Plating Carrier: The term “plating” comes from the old days when paper tickets were used. First, Travel Agencies would be given a supply of paper tickets from each airline they were allowed to sell. As you can imagine, the larger agencies out there had safes filled with various airlines stock. The agencies would also have to do a sales report for each airline they did sales for. IATA later created the BSP – Bank Settlement Plan (Canada) and ARC – Airlines Reporting Corporation (USA) to bring some streamlining to the ticketing process. A standard and common set of paper tickets were created (2 part, 4 part, MCO, etc) which were issued to travel agencies. The travel agency would then receive a heavy metal plate with the airlines emblem, name and IATA 3 digit code embossed on it. It was the size of a credit card. The agency could sell a ticket on, airline YY; they would take a generic 2 or 4 part ticket, the YY “plate” and put it in one of the manual validators. The ticket would be zipped through and then the agency would have a valid YY Airlines ticket. So, today when we hear or read about the “plating” carrier, this is where the term comes from. Marketing Carrier: This is the airline who is selling the ticket. There can be more than one marketing carrier for any true operating flight. I will explain this later, see Code Share Partners. Operating Carrier: This is the airline that is responsible for operating the flights. Or, if you’d like to think of it as “what airlines’ tail can I see sitting on the gate”. The operating carrier is often the same as the marketing carrier, however if you have traveled internationally, you often could find yourself sitting on a partner’s aircraft since codeshare agreement are often the best way for an airline to extend their reaches outside their normal serviced routes. See below for details. Code Share partner: A code share partner is one of many carriers that have agreed to share a route and publicize the route as their own flight. In this day and age we are all too familiar with the 3 big alliances around the globe. Star Alliance, SkyTeam and OneWorld. Each is a group of airlines that share their airline code “codeshare” on each other. This is a very unique way to appear to have more route coverage to the public without really having to have more aircraft or crew. It should be noted here that it is a legal requirement in most countries that all codeshares be disclosed to the traveling public. The traveller must be advised that “Ms. Smith, your flight to Upper Rubber Boot is actually being operated by Rubber Boot International Airlines”, yet Ms. Smith is actually talking to the reservations agent at Air Lower Slobodia. Now that you have the basic understanding of some of the commonly used terms, I will now attempt to explain the difference between Interline and Codeshare agreements. Interline: Any sort of cooperation between airlines. That can take the form of an interline ticketing agreement, an interline baggage agreement or both. An interline ticketing agreement is simply an agreement between two airlines to sell their flights on a common ticket. The airlines work out a pricing agreement to collect one single fare for two connecting flights and the division of moneys between the two carriers, often called a “prorate”. The airlines can then decide on who the marketing carrier will be. If both carriers wish to be the marketing carrier, the agreement is considered a bilateral interline agreement. In this case, both carriers will be the “plating” carrier whenever each sells the interline ticket. The interlining carriers then file the interlining route and fare with the various filling authorities such as OAG, ATPCO, Innovata etc. The back end accounting becomes a challenge and it is not to be taken lightly. Since your BSP will be collecting the funds and distributing these funds to the marketing carrier, a backend accounting distributor is often used to properly distribute the correct funds between the interlining carriers. An interline baggage agreement is much simpler. An interline baggage agreement allows two airlines to accept and properly “through check” baggage onto the interlining airlines. The baggage information is collected at the passengers’ first check in point. The baggage tags are issued and communicated between the airlines and the airport authorities. This agreement is more convenient for the passengers as without the baggage interline agreement the passenger would be required to collect and re-check in their luggage at each connection point. Most carriers who have an interline ticketing agreement also have an interline baggage agreement; however it is not always the case. The interlining agreements can be negotiated separately. Finally, what is the basic difference between CodeShare and Interline? A codeshare partner simply means two or more carriers have agreed to be marketing carriers and sell a common route under their own flight number and name. The big buzzword around this is “One Stop Shop”. Go to one airline website or CRS or booking engine to complete and purchase the entire journey in one transaction. The operating carrier is often one of the marketing carriers. A very good example of this would be American Airlines flight AA051 from London Heathrow – LHR to Dallas Ft. Worth – DFW. The actual operating carrier is American however, because AA is part of a global alliance the flight has 8 (yes eight!) marketing carrier flight numbers attached to it. American flight AA051 is operated AND marketed as AA051 as well as BA1504; IB4193; QR4913; AY5753; GF6651; LY8029 and MH9395. I have seen some operating carriers that are not even a marketing carrier. When I first started traveling, I sometimes stopped at my published gate and saw that it was a completely different airline and flight number scheduled to depart. I would run back to the FIDS to recheck my gate, only to see the FIDS flipping from codeshare partner to codeshare partner to codeshare partner for the actual operating flight. A codeshare agreement usually requires an interline agreement and allows the marketing carrier to publish an operating carriers flights within their system and sales channels as their own. In case you are wondering, through boarding passes are separate from interline agreements and do not necessarily mean there is an interlining agreement between the airlines. This is a completely different IATA process called IATCI (Inter Airline Through Check-In). The transfer of baggage information between the carriers is an IATA process called BRS (Baggage Reconciliation System). Both of these processes involve messages shooting back and forth between systems allowing each airlines CRS to “talk” to the other airlines CRS. In the end, if the airline can make it easier for the customer to travel on their airline, they will indeed gain market share. A share in a large market is better than no share at all..
Recommended publications
  • JANUARY European Parliament Vote on Airport Charges (15 January)
    REVIEW www.airtransportnews.aero JANUARY European Parliament vote on airport charges (15 January) he European Parliament concluded its first reading on a proposed Directive on airport charges, initially the Directive will only incentivise conflicts between airlines and airports, resulting in uncertainty over infra - adopted by the European Commission a year ago. ACI EUROPE is appreciative of the European Parlia - structure investments and potentially delaying much needed capacity development. Olivier Jankovec added: T ment’s work to improve the proposal of the European Commission, but considers that serious concerns "That the Directive is silent on the need for airports to be incentivised to invest in time for the new facilities regarding fundamental issues remain. These include risking costly and damaging over-regulation as well as com - to match demand, is puzzling. It shows that the Directive not only remains imbalanced in favour of airlines but promising the ability of European airports to finance much needed infrastructure and capacity development. also fails to reflect that the interests of the airlines and that of the travelling public are not the same." Whilst the European Commission proposed to apply the Directive to all airports with more than 1 million pas - Responding to the vote of the European Parliament on Airport Charges, IACA is extremely disappointed that an sengers per year, the European Parliament increased this figure to 5 million, leaving States still free to apply opportunity to address the unbalanced relationship between the fully deregulated airline sector and their mo - the Directive to airports below this threshold. As most European airports now operate in a highly competitive nopolistic service provider (airports) has been missed.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis Analytics 2016 Quantifying the Economic Contribution Of
    Quantifying the Economic Contribution of Emirates to South Africa A report prepared by Genesis Analytics June 2016 © Genesis Analytics 2016 Document Reference: Quantifying the Economic Contribution of Emirates to South Africa, Final Date: June 2016 Contact Information Genesis Analytics (Pty) Ltd Office 3, 50 Sixth Road Hyde Park, 2196, Johannesburg South Africa Tel: +27 (0) 11 994 7000 Fax: +27 (0) 11 994 7099 www.genesis-analytics.com Authors Ryan Short Mbongeni Ndlovu Tshediso Matake Dirk van Seventer With thanks to Annabelle Ong and Chris Cuttle Contact Person Ryan Short [email protected] +27 (0) 11 994 7000 ii Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................. VI 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background and purpose ........................................................................ 1 1.2. Report structure ...................................................................................... 2 2. ABOUT EMIRATES ................................................................................. 3 3. OVERVIEW OF EMIRATES GROUP IN SOUTH AFRICA ..................... 4 4. A FRAMEWORK FOR MEASURING CONTRIBUTION ......................... 6 5. ENABLED CONTRIBUTION ................................................................... 9 5.1. The economic benefits of air connectivity ............................................... 9 5.2. The connectivity benefits of Emirates .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Before Alliances, there was Pan American World Airways . and Trans World Airlines. Before the mega- Alliances, there was interlining, facilitated by IATA Like dogs marking territory, airlines around the world are sniffing each other's tail fins looking for partners." Daniel Riordan “The hardest thing in working on an alliance is to coordinate the activities of people who have different instincts and a different language, and maybe worship slightly different travel gods, to get them to work together in a culture that allows them to respect each other’s habits and convictions, and yet work productively together in an environment in which you can’t specify everything in advance.” Michael E. Levine “Beware a pact with the devil.” Martin Shugrue Airline Motivations For Alliances • the desire to achieve greater economies of scale, scope, and density; • the desire to reduce costs by consolidating redundant operations; • the need to improve revenue by reducing the level of competition wherever possible as markets are liberalized; and • the desire to skirt around the nationality rules which prohibit multinational ownership and cabotage. Intercarrier Agreements · Ticketing-and-Baggage Agreements · Joint-Fare Agreements · Reciprocal Airport Agreements · Blocked Space Relationships · Computer Reservations Systems Joint Ventures · Joint Sales Offices and Telephone Centers · E-Commerce Joint Ventures · Frequent Flyer Program Alliances · Pooling Traffic & Revenue · Code-Sharing Code Sharing The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA carrier designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
    [Show full text]
  • Bula Travel Partners, Fiji Airways Joined the Oneworld Alliance As The
    From: Fiji Airways Sent: Friday, June 08, 2018 Subject: What's New at Fiji Airways Bula Travel Partners, Fiji Airways joined the oneworld alliance as the first oneworld connect partner We are thrilled and honoured to announce that Fiji Airways has joined the oneworld alliance as the very first oneworld connect partner globally. Fiji Airways joining the oneworld alliance, including 13 of the world’s biggest airlines, is a truly global partnership for the benefit of our and your passengers. oneworld connect is a new membership platform within the greater oneworld alliance for relatively smaller airlines to link up to the world’s premier airline alliance. What oneworld connect means for customers We’re saying Bula Britain with a new British Airways codeshare agreement We are also delighted to share that Fiji Airways has signed a codeshare agreement with British Airways - to open up the most convenient access for guests from the UK and Europe to Fiji and the South Pacific. This codeshare is the perfect foray into oneworld. New Fiji Airways Travel App Visit your app store and download the free Fiji Airways travel app. New Fiji Airways 3D art at Nadi Airport The second installation of the Fly Like A Fijian 3D art series at Nadi International Airport is now live. It is inspired by the natural beauty of Fiji, showcasing our flora and fauna. The piece is located to the far right of the international departures area towards Kokonui. Visit the 3D art with your family and friends and share your picture on social media and be sure to use #FlyLikeAFijian For more information, please visit our website at www.fijiairways.com.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 REVIEW • Ryanair Introduces Direct Flights from Larnaka to Brussels
    2016 REVIEW SPONSORED BY: 1 www.atn.aero 2015 REVIEW • Ryanair introduces direct flights from Larnaka to Brussels JANUARY 4/1/2016 14/1/2016 • Etihad Airways today launched fresh legal action in a bid to overturn a German court’s decision to revoke the approval for 29 of its • Genève Aéroport welcomed a total of nearly 15.8 million passengers codeshare flights with airberlin in 2015 • ALTA welcomes Enrique Cueto as new President of its Executive 5/1/2016 Committee • Spirit Airlines, Inc. today announced Robert L. Fornaro has been appointed President and Chief Executive Officer, effective immediately 6/1/2016 • FAA releases B4UFLY Smartphone App 7/1/2016 • The International Air Transport Association (IATA) announced it is expanding its activities to prevent payment fraud in the air travel industry • Boeing delivered 762 commercial airplanes in 2015, 39 more than the previous year and most ever for the company as it enters its centennial year • Rynair become the first airline to carry over 100m international Source: LATAM customers in one year • American Airlines and LATAM Airlines Group are applying for • BOC Aviation orders 30 A320 Family regulatory approval to enter into a joint business (JB) to better serve their customers • Bordeaux Airport 2015 review: Nearly 5,300,000 passengers in 2015: growth of +7.6% 15/1/2016 • Etihad Airways today welcomed the ruling by the higher administrative 8/1/2016 court in Luneburg reversing an earlier judgment and allowing it to • The European Commission has approved under the EU Merger continue operating
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary Washington, Dc
    BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, DC ) Application of ) ) EW DISCOVER GmbH ) ) Docket DOT-OST-2021-0081 for Blanket Statements of Authorization ) Under 14 C.F.R. Part 212 ) (Codesharing with Lufthansa, Austrian Airlines, ) Brussels Airlines, and ) Swiss International Air Lines) ) ) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AND REPLY OF EW DISCOVER GmbH Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: Arthur J. Molins General Counsel, The Americas The Lufthansa Group 1400 RXR Plaza West Tower Uniondale, NY 11556 (516) 296-9234 (phone) [email protected] August 4, 2021 BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, DC ) Application of ) ) EW DISCOVER GmbH ) ) Docket DOT-OST-2021-0081 for Blanket Statements of Authorization ) Under 14 C.F.R. Part 212 ) (Codesharing with Lufthansa, Austrian Airlines, ) Brussels Airlines, and ) and Swiss International Air Lines) ) ) DATED: August 4, 2021 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AND REPLY OF EW DISCOVER GmbH EW Discover GmbH (“EW Discover”) submits this reply to “Comments” filed by Condor Flugdienst GmbH (“Condor”) regarding the above-captioned application.1 Condor is asking the Department to intervene in a competitive dispute between two German carriers involving issues that are currently under review by the German competition authority. Condor specifically demands that the Department preempt the German competition authority’s review by initiating its own investigation and taking the extraordinary and unprecedented action of requiring Lufthansa (not EW Discover, the applicant) to interline with Condor. EW Discover asks that the Department disregard Condor’s spurious intervention in this docket and promptly approve EW Discover’s 1 Comments of Condor Flugdienst GmbH, July 26, 2021 (Docket DOT-OST-2021-0081) (“Condor Comments”).
    [Show full text]
  • CODESHARE AGREEMENT – a Way to Gain Market Power and Raise Airfares? an Investigation of the Effect of Codeshare Agreement on the European Airline Market
    Södertörn University | Institution for Social Science Bachelor Thesis 15 hp. |Economics | Fall Semester 2014 (Frivilligt: Programmet för xxx) CODESHARE AGREEMENT – A way to gain market power and raise airfares? An investigation of the effect of codeshare agreement on the European airline market By: Martin Servin Almkvist Mentor: Stig Blomskog ABSTRACT Over the last decades the airline industry has changed to a more competitive market as an effect of the deregulation in the European Union and United States. To keep and attract new customers partnerships between airlines have become a common scenario. Alliances have emerged and grown and created deeper incitement for a cooperative behavior between airlines. Codeshare agreement, which originated as a way to get more exposure, has now established as a strategic approach to gain larger market shares. Codeshare is a bilateral agreement between airlines that makes it possible for a passenger to travel on two different airlines on the same booking code. This study aims to investigate whether cooperative behavior like codeshare would eliminate or reduce competition on nonstop flights within Europe. Both economic theories and prior work is covered which gives an insight of the complexity behind antitrust behavior. Data was collected and regression analysis was made to detect certain patterns that could explain if codeshare agreements could lead to higher fares on nonstop traffic on intra-Europe flights. The empirical result showed that certain agreements, like parallel- and unilateral- codeshare, are resulting in higher fares on nonstop flights. This could be explained by underlying factors that prevent competition, like airport congestion and the fact that being a member of an alliance in some cases will prevent new airlines to enter a specific market.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Paper Airline Alliances And
    Citation: 45 Hous. L. Rev. 293 2008-2009 Provided by: William A. Wise Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Mon Jul 17 10:43:42 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information ARTICLE AIRLINE ALLIANCES AND SYSTEMS COMPETITION James Reitzes & DianaMoss* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODU CTION ..................................................................... 294 II. AIRLINE ALLIANCES AND SYSTEMS COMPETITION ................ 296 A. Alliances as System s ..................................................... 296 B. Systems and Competition.............................................. 299 C. Antitrust Immunity and Airline Alliances ................... 303 III. COMPETITIVE ISSUES SURROUNDING ALLIANCES ................. 305 A. Elimination of Horizontal Competition ........................ 306 1. Concerns Over Immunity ....................................... 306 2. Alliance Expansion and Implicationsfor InterallianceCompetition ...................................... 307 B. Vertical Issues-Discriminationand Foreclosure by Immunized Alliances .................................................... 309 * James Reitzes is a Principal of The Brattle Group (Washington, D.C.), and Diana Moss is Vice President and Senior Fellow
    [Show full text]
  • HAWAIIAN AIRLINES DOMESTIC CONTRACT of CARRIAGE (Revised September 18, 2019)
    HAWAIIAN AIRLINES DOMESTIC CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE (Revised September 18, 2019) RULE 1: DEFINITIONS As used in this Contract of Carriage, the following terms have the meanings ascribed to them below, unless otherwise defined herein: “Adult” means a person who has reached his/her eighteenth birthday as of the date of travel. “Alternate transportation” means air transportation with a confirmed reservation at no additional charge (by any scheduled airline licensed by the DOT), or other transportation accepted and used by you in the case of denied boarding. “Applicable adult fare” means the fare which would be applicable to an adult for the transportation, but, excluding any special fares applicable to a guest’s status, e.g., Military fares, adult standby, etc. “Baggage” means such reasonable articles, effects, and other personal property of a ticketed guest as are reasonably necessary or appropriate for the wear, use, comfort, or convenience of the guest in connection with the guest’s trip. Unless otherwise specified, it shall include both checked and carry-on-baggage and property of the guest. “Baggage Check Tag” mean those portions of the Ticket that identify your checked baggage and that are issued by the carrier as a receipt for your checked baggage. “Bicycle Case” means a sealed box, hard-sided, or soft-sided case containing a bicycle, and/or bicycle accessories, that has an Outside Linear Dimension greater than 62 inches (157 cm) and less than 115 inches (292 cm). “Board Item.” See Rule 18(D)(22). “Carriage” means transportation of guests and their baggage by air or ground, either gratuitously or for payment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conversation with
    A MAGAZinE FOR AIRLinE EXECUTIVES 2006 Issue No. 2 2006 Issue No. 2 T a k i n g y o u r a i r l i n e t o n e w h e i g h t s the globAl AdvocAte A Conversation With . Giovanni Bisignani director general and CEO International Air Transport Association page 38 www.sabreairlinesolutions.com I NSIDE Government regulations 6 affect globalization Latin American carriers 42 grow regionally AirAsia overcomes challenges 50 to its Thai-based subsidiary making contact To suggest a topic for a possible future article, change your address or add someone to the mailing list, please send an e-mail message to the Ascend staff at [email protected]. T aking your airline to new heights For more information about products 2006 Issue No. 2 and services featured in this issue Editors in Chief of Ascend, please visit our Web site Stephani Hawkins at www.sabreairlinesolutions.com B. Scott Hunt or contact one of the following 3150 Sabre Drive Sabre Airline Solutions regional Southlake, Texas 76092 representatives: www.sabreairlinesolutions.com Sabre Airline Solutions and the Sabre Airline Solutions logo are trademarks and/or service marks of an affiliate of Sabre Holdings Corporation. ©2005 Sabre Inc. All rights reserved. Art Direction/Design Asia/Pacific Shari Manning Andrew Powell Design Contributors Vice President Erin Jackson, Michelle Kennedy, Level No. 05-05 Tim St. Clair Technopark Block 750E Contributors Chai Chee Road Shaquiq Ahmed, Walter Avila, Jack Singapore 469005 Burkholder, Vinay Dube, Kim Farrow, Phone: +65 9127 6927 Kristen Fritschel, Glen Harvell, Vicki E-mail: [email protected] Hummel, Carla Jensen, Craig Lindsey, Marcela Lizárraga, Roman Lopatko, Deborah Magee, Yusuf Mauladad, Alan Europe, Middle East and Africa McWalters, Gary Millward, Andrew Murray Smyth Powell, Srikanth Raghunathan, Jessica Vice President Schneider, Jennifer Silvia, Murray Smyth, Somerville House Kevin Stupfel, Renzo Vaccari, Jung Yu.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Global Airline Alliances As a Strategy for International Network Development by Antonio Tugores-García
    Analysis of Global Airline Alliances as a Strategy for International Network Development by Antonio Tugores-García M.S., Civil Engineering, Enginyer de Camins, Canals i Ports Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2008 Submitted to the MIT Engineering Systems Division and the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Technology and Policy and Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2012 © 2012 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved Signature of Author__________________________________________________________________________________ Antonio Tugores-García Department of Engineering Systems Division Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics May 14, 2012 Certified by___________________________________________________________________________________________ Peter P. Belobaba Principal Research Scientist, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by__________________________________________________________________________________________ Joel P. Clark Professor of Material Systems and Engineering Systems Acting Director, Technology and Policy Program Accepted by___________________________________________________________________________________________ Eytan H. Modiano Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 2 Analysis of Global Airline Alliances as a Strategy for International Network Development by Antonio Tugores-García
    [Show full text]
  • Turbulence in the Skies
    C.D. Howe Institute Commentary www.cdhowe.org No. 181, April 2003 ISSN 8001-824 Turbulence in the Skies: Options for Making Canadian Airline Travel More Attractive Fred Lazar In this issue... Should it matter to Canadian travelers and Canadians in general whether any Canadian airline survives to provide domestic service? The unequivocal answer is: You bet it matters! The Study in Brief This Commentary focuses on recommendations set out by the Canada Transportation Act Review Panel on permitting foreign entry into the domestic airline market and on the competitive landscape in passenger aviation services in Canada. The paper concentrates on the scope for new entry into the Canadian market, the likelihood that new entrants might, in fact, occur if the Canadian market is opened to foreign airlines and investors and the potential market impact if that did happen. If the federal government succeeds in negotiating a more liberal agreement with the United States, the Commentary argues that there would be limited entry at best — there are a very small number of markets in Canada that provide entry opportunities — and the entry might end up displacing Canadian companies in terms of the routes they operate and the number of frequencies they provide on existing routes. Even limited entry would weaken the financial performance of Westjet Airlines Ltd., though it might actually benefit Air Canada because it could use modified existing rights to maximize the benefits of its Toronto hub within a North American market. While I fully support the recommendations of the Review Panel, I believe that the competitive consequences for the domestic Canadian market of a bilateral agreement with the United States are likely to be minimal.
    [Show full text]