Note on Spelling and the Use of Terms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Note on Spelling and the Use of Terms In general, I have followed the practice of the Hudson's Bay Company's Archives. 'Timiskaming,' however, is the modern spelling. The original French 'Te1niscamingue' later became 'Temiscaming' or 'Temiskaming,' but I have considered it preferable to use the modern spelling through out. Similarly, I have continued to refer to the post as 'Fort Timiskaming,' although after the coalition of 1821 it was often called 'Timiskaming House,' in line with the English practice for the inland posts. Again, for the sake of uniformity, I have used 'Moose Fort' in stead of 'Moose Factory.· The term 'voyagers' is employed in the Hudson's Bay Archives for the Company's canoemen, usually Orkneymen or Indians, and I have adopted it in order t.o distinguish them from the French 'voyageurs' of the North West Company. Moreover, the Archives always refer to 'Orkneymen,' never the more correct 'Orcadians.' The English form for modern Lac des Deux Montagnes, Quebec, 'Lake of Two Mountains,' appears consistently in the Archives both for the lake and the post and I have accordingly used it throughout, except for one reference to the modern lake. Surnames and other names were often spelled the way they sounded, not always correctly. William Polson's name, for instance, appears thus both in the Hudson-'s Bay Company's records and on his tombstone, although the correct spelling 'Paulson' was used in the case of his father, William Paulson, a surgeon at Moose Fort. Modern Paul son Bay at the head of Lake Timiskaming is named after William Pol son and his family. Finally, in transcribing quotations from the original documents I have followed the practice of lowering the upper case end ings for abbreviations, for example, 'Mr' instead of 'Mr', 'Inds' instead of 'Ind•', and so on. This page intentionally left blank Chief Factor Robert Hamilton, commander of the Timiskaming district, 1865-8 The Cameron family at Niagara Falls, 1858: (from left to right) James Cameron (aged twelve), Chief Factor Angus Cameron's son and after wards Dr James Cameron of Firhall; Angus Cameron, the Chief Factor's nephew and later second president of the Bank of Toronto; his wife, FranoesSimpson Cameron, Sir George Simpson's daughter; Chief Factor Angus Cameron; Grace Cameron, sister of the younger Angus Cameron and niece of the Chief Factor Chief Factor Angus Cameron in old age (Public Archives of Ontario) Chief Trader Charles Stuart, commander of the Timiskaming district, 1868-72 (?) (Public Archives of Ontario) Side view of Fort Tirniskamingabout 1875, taken fromthe Ontario side of the narrows Front view of Fort Timiskaming from the south, no date (Public Archivesof Ontario) Hudson's Ba y Post, Bear Island, Lake Timagami, no date (Public Archivesof Ontario) Indians at Fort Mattagami (Matawagamingue), July 1906 (Public Archivesof Ontario) Louis MacDougall, sign er of th e James Bay Indian Treaty at Fort Abitibi, 7 June 1906, and probably Alexander McDougall's grandson (Public Archives of Ontario) Hudson's Bay canoe on Lac des Quinze (Ottawa River), 1907 (Public Archivesof Ontario) AEneas Cameron's Beaver Club medal, obverse and reverse .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Picture Yourself Here: an Economic Snapshot of Temiskaming Shores
Picture Yourself Here: An Economic Snapshot of Temiskaming Shores Commentary No. 45 | November 2020 By: Mercedes Labelle Who We Are President & CEO Land acknowledgement Charles Cirtwill Northern Policy Institute (NPI) would like to acknowledge the First Peoples on whose traditional Board of Directors territories we live and work. NPI is grateful for the opportunity to have our offices located on these lands Pierre Bélanger (Chair) Charles Cirtwill (President and thank all the generations of people who have Florence MacLean (Vice-Chair & CEO) taken care of this land. Northwest) Suzanne Bélanger- Asima Vezina (Vice-Chair Fontaine Our main offices: Northeast) Dave Canfield Dr. Brian Tucker (Treasurer) Kevin Eshkawkogan • Thunder Bay on Robinson-Superior Treaty territory Dwayne Nashkawa Alan Spacek and the land is the traditional territory of the (Secretary) Anishnaabeg and Fort William First Nation • Sudbury is on the Robinson-Huron Treaty Advisory Council territory and the land is the traditional territory Jean Pierre Chabot (Chair, Peter Goring of the Atikameksheng Anishnaabeg as well as NPI Advisory Council) Cheryl Kennelly Wahnapitae First Nation Michael Atkins Winter Dawn Lipscombe Kim Jo Bliss Dr. George C. Macey • Both are home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit Adam Castonguay Ogimaa Duke Peltier and Métis peoples. Katie Elliot Danielle Perras Shane Fugere Bill Spinney We recognize and appreciate the historic connection George Graham that Indigenous people have to these territories. We recognize the contributions that they have made in shaping and strengthening these communities, the Research Advisory Board province and the country as a whole. Dr. Heather Hall (Chair, Dr. Peter Hollings NPI Research Advisory Board) Brittany Paat Dr.
[Show full text]
Consolidated Municipal Services Managers and Areas Served
CONSOLIDATED MUNICIPAL SERVICES MANAGERS AND AREAS SERVED Consolidated Municipal Services Managers (CMSMs) in Southern Ontario provide a similar range of programs and services and also provide land ambulance and public health services with the approval of the Minister of Health. The role of the delivery agent in the provision of social services has progressed over time. The Local Services Realignment announced by the government in January 1997, outlined new directions for the delivery of social assistance, child care and social housing. These changes have created the opportunity to implement a more integrated system of social and community health services under municipal leadership. An integrated system is one in which policies; programs and services are coordinated and complementary and serve common goals that address the well being of individuals, families and communities. Consolidation of municipal service management has resulted in the management of the delivery of social assistance, child care, and social housing by 36 municipalities in Southern Ontario and by 10 District Social Services Administration Boards as well as the Regional Municipality of Sudbury in Northern Ontario. Authority to require consolidation of municipal service management is provided by the Services Improvement Act and the Social Assistance Reform Act. In Northern Ontario, ten District Social Services Administration Boards (DSSABs) and the Regional Municipality of Sudbury were approved as CMSMs. DSSABs are responsible for serving both municipalities and territories without municipal organization. The nine southern Ontario regional municipalities plus the City of Toronto are, by legislation, boards of health for their region, as well as CMSMs. [Please refer to attached chart outlining Consolidated Municipal Service Managers - Ontario Works, Child Care and Social Housing -- area served in Southern and Northern Ontario] 1 Consolidated Municipal Service Managers Ontario Works, Child Care and Social Housing Service Manager Area Served SOUTHERN ONTARIO 1.
[Show full text]
Rank of Pops
Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
[Show full text]
Looking for a Boiler Supply & Servicing Company with The
Service Area Volume 49 • June 2017 South West tel: 519 884 0600 505 Dotzert Court, fax: 519 884 0213 Unit 1 toll free: 1 800 265 8809 Waterloo, ON N2L 6A7 www.waterloomanufacturing.ca East tel: 613 228 3597 19 Grenfell Crescent, Bay 1 fax: 613 225 0116 Ottawa (Nepean) ON toll free: 1 800 265 8809 K2G 0G3 www.waterloomanufacturing.ca Looking For A Boiler Supply & Servicing Company With The Knowledge & Experience To Get It Right? We are that company and we want to help you optimize your boiler room. Established in 1850, Waterloo Manufacturing Ltd. has a long history of growth and evolution that continues to this day. In our early days we began as a manufacturer of farm machinery equipment, steam engines, pulp and paper rolls, and in 1947, became an authorized Cleaver Brooks Representative for South West Ontario. In 1984, we streamlined the company to further focus on solely providing boiler room equipment solutions in South West Ontario. In 2015, a unique opportunity arose to expand our company to include the Eastern Ontario region formerly covered by John M. Schermerhorn Ltd. In 2017, a further opportunity arose to expand our company to include the territory formerly represented by Johnson Paterson, Inc. to be the sole representative for Cleaver Brooks in the province of Ontario. *Refer to Map on Page 4. Ontario West Central Ontario Ontario East • Brant County • Algoma District • Carleton County • Bruce County • Cochrane District • Dundas County • Dufferin County • Durham County • Frontenac County • Elgin County • Haliburton County • Glengarry
[Show full text]
The Riverwatch Handbook a Field Guide for Ottawa Riverkeeper’S Riverwatchers
The Riverwatch Handbook A field guide for Ottawa Riverkeeper’s Riverwatchers Ottawa Riverkeeper - Published 2015 613.321.1120 • 1-888-9KEEPER www.ottawariverkeeper.ca • @ottriverkeeper www.facebook.com/ottawa.riverkeeper This field guide is designed to help riverwatchers 1) identify aquatic phenomena and environmental concerns, 2) collect the information needed to report their observations, and 3) connect with the proper agencies and organizations with these questions and concerns. Riverwatchers should consider potential sources and causes of observed phenomena. In a river system, causes can come from activities on land (e.g. deforestation, development/construction), areas upstream, and be the result of events that have happened recently (e.g. water releases from dams, heavy rains and wind). 1. Aquatic Phenomena 1.1 Water Colour Brown Tea Colour: dissolved organic matter (i.e. decaying plant matter), algae growth, and minerals such as iron. Just as tea leaves alter the colour of the water in your tea cup, the plant material adds Red: Suspended sediment from run-off, organic matter and color to the water. and minerals such as iron. Ottawa River at Rocher Fendu. Photo: Wilderness Tours Ottawa River at Hudson, QC. Photo: Sue McLennan Brown/Cloudy Colour: Suspended Grey: Suspended sediment from runoff sediment from runoff or erosion. (typically in urban areas from streams and storm drains) Ottawa River at Hawkesbury, ON. Photo: Meaghan Murphy Gatineau River tributary, QC. Photo: Rita Jain Yellow: Some algae or tree pollen. Green/Blue-Green: Algae bloom Private lake in South Ottawa. Photo: Larry Pegg Ottawa River at Lake Timiskaming. Photo: OBVT 1.2 What’s that ﬂoating in the water? Foam: The majority of foam that we see is natural.
[Show full text]
Ontario Ontario 2001 Census Agricultural Regions Régions Agricoles De Recensement and Census Divisions Et Divisions De Recensement, 2001
MAP 1 CARTE 1 Ontario Ontario 2001 Census Agricultural Regions Régions agricoles de recensement and Census Divisions et Divisions de recensement, 2001 LEGEND LÉGENDE Census Régions agricoles Agricultural Region de recensement Census Division Division de recensement Urban Centre Centre urbain 60 Kenora 58 5 56 59 Thunder Bay 58 Timmins 57 49 52 54 3 43 44 Sault Ste. Marie 53 16 Sudbury 42 43 51 41 57 51 49 48 2 22 47 Ottawa 19 18 46 4 2 40 23 21 6 1 20 3 9 31 12 10 30 24 Toronto 15 7 16 25 Hamilton 2 11 39 14 1 32 29 18 13 38 London 26 11 10 34 28 Toronto Windsor 36 London 1 37 Windsor 37 Inset Médaillon A A Source: 2001 Census of Agriculture, Agriculture Division, Statistics Canada Source: Recensement de l'agriculture de 2001, Division de l'agriculture, Statistique Canada Map produced by Spatial Analysis and Geomatics Applications (SAGA), Agriculture Division, Statistics Canada, 2002 Carte créée par Analyse spatiale et applications géomatiques (ASAG), Division de l'agriculture, Statistique Canada, 2002 Ontario Map 1 / Carte 1 2001 Census Agricultural Regions and Census Divisions Régions agricoles de recensement et divisions de recensement, 2001 1 Southern Ontario Region 4 Eastern Ontario Region Région du Sud de l'Ontario Région de l'Est de l'Ontario 25 Hamilton Division 1 Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry United Counties 26 Niagara Regional Municipality 2 Prescott and Russell United Counties 28 Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 6 Ottawa Division 29 Brant County 7 Leeds and Grenville United Counties 32 Oxford County 9 Lanark County 34
[Show full text]
SUMMARY – Project Description Under the Canadian Environmental
SUMMARY – Project Description Under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act TIMISKAMING DAM-BRIDGE OF QUEBEC REPLACEMENT PROJECT PSPC Reference: R.073116 Tetra Tech Reference: 32760TT (60ET) rev 1b - May 2018 GENERAL 1. PROJECT CONTEXT The replacement of the Quebec Dam (bridge), which is part of the Timiskaming Dam Complex, crosses the Ottawa River at the border between the provinces of Quebec and Ontario, on Route 101 in the city of Témiscaming, which becomes Highway 63 in Ontario. The project consists in building a new structure approximately 25 meters downstream of the existing dam (bridge) and then to demolish the old structure. The characteristics of the new dam/bridge will be identical to that of the current structure. Project name: Replacement of the Quebec Dam 2. PROPONENT’S CONTACT INFORMATION Public Services and Procurement Canada 11 rue Laurier, Phase III, Place du Portage Gatineau, Québec K1A 0S5 Telephone: 1-800-926-9105 Email: [email protected] Person in charge of the project: Shawn Bhatia, P.Eng, M.Eng, Project Manager Telephone: 613-220-0805 Email: [email protected] The commission for the evaluation of environmental effects of the project was awarded to Tetra Tech: Jacques Richard, Eng. M. Sc., Project Manager 4665 Wilfrid-Hamel Boulevard Quebec City (Quebec) G1P 2J7 Telephone: 418-871-3414, poste 7305537 Email: [email protected] 3. CONSULTATIONS WITH THE PUBLIC AND OTHER GROUPS Consultations with the Public and Other Public Bodies The proponents of the project spoke with various local stakeholders, such as the Municipality of Témiscaming, the Regional County Municipality and the management of the Rayonier Advanced Materials Pulp and paper Mill, to inform them of the project, planning and schedules.
[Show full text]
HISTORIC FLOOD RISK on the OTTAWA RIVER Abitibi-Timiskaming Region and Mattawa Down to Lac Deschenes
Ottawa River Commission de planification Regulation de la régularisation Planning Board de la rivière des Outaouais HISTORIC FLOOD RISK ON THE OTTAWA RIVER Abitibi-Timiskaming region and Mattawa down to Lac Deschenes OTTAWA/GATINEAU, Thursday May 9, 2019 — The Ottawa River Regulating Committee warns that most reservoirs in the Abitibi-Timiskaming region are now filled and that excess waters from these areas are now flowing through the downstream river system. With significant rainfall of 25 to 45 mm forecast to begin today over much of the watershed, water levels on the Ottawa River between Mattawa and Lac Deschenes are expected to continue to increase over the next few days and reach a peak that may exceed previous historic record levels. Based on the current forecast the following conditions are expected along the Ottawa River: • MATTAWA : levels could exceed the historic high of 1960; • PEMBROKE : levels could exceed the historic high of 1960; • LAC COULONGE : levels could exceed the previous historic high of April 29, 2019; • CHATS LAKE : levels could exceed the previous historic high of April 30, 2019; • LAC DESCHENES : levels could exceed the previous historic high of April 30, 2019; • GATINEAU (HULL) TO THE MONTREAL REGION : levels are expected to increase but should remain below the May 1, 2019 peak levels; • ABITIBI-TIMISKAMING REGION: elevated water levels and flows with flooding are expected • Lac des Quinze and Kipawa Reservoir – contact the Centre des opérations gouvernementales du gouvernement du Québec at 1-866-650-1666, [email protected], for information; • Lake Timiskaming – refer to the following press release: https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/water-level-warning-for-lake-timiskaming- second-notice-818291296.html .
[Show full text]
Office of the Chief Coroner/Ontario Forensic Pathology Service Maid Data
Office of the Chief Coroner/Ontario Forensic Pathology Service MAiD Data Statistics as of September 30, 2019: • Total number of cases completed in Ontario: 3,822 • Sex: – Female: 50% – Male: 50% • Type: – Clinician-administered: 3,821 • Age: – Patient-administered: 1 – Average Age: 75 – Youngest: 22 – Oldest: 106 • Setting of death: – Hospital: 47% • Underlying conditions: – Private Residence: 44% – Cancer-Related: 63% – Retirement Home/Seniors Residence/Other: 5% – Circulatory/Respiratory: 17% – LTC Facility/Nursing Home: 4% – Neurodegenerative: 11% – Other: 9% • Number of Unique MAiD Providers: • Total number of cases with organ donation: 30 – Clinicians: 470 – Physicians: 438 – Nurse Practitioners: 32 – Hospitals: 130 Office of the Chief Coroner/Ontario Forensic Pathology Service MAiD Data Statistics as of September 30, 2019: • Clinician Specialty: – Family Medicine: 61% – Internal Medicine: 10% – General Practitioner: 9% – Anesthesiology: 7% – Emergency/Critical Care Medicine: 7% – Surgery: 2% – Other: 2% – Oncology: 2% • Reflection Period – % Cases with < 10 clear days: 24% – Rationale: – Imminent Loss of Capacity: 14% – Imminent Death: 3% – Both: 7% Office of the Chief Coroner/Ontario Forensic Pathology Service MAiD Data County MAiD Cases County MAiD Cases Algoma District 34 Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 32 Brant County 29 Haliburton County 10 Bruce County 38 Halton Regional Municipality 160 Chatham - Kent Division 36 Hamilton Division 131 Cochrane District 27 Hastings County 61 Dufferin County 16 Huron County 22 Durham
[Show full text]
Read the Release
For Immediate Release Human Capital Series part 2/3: Hey you in the Northeast! 25 July, 2019 – The next four reports from the UPDATED Northern Projections: Human Capital Series have been released. These reports explore demographic and labour market trends as well as projections into the future of Northeastern Ontario, specifically in the districts of Cochrane, Timiskaming, Nipissing, and Parry Sound. Below are some key recommendations found in the reports: 1. Leverage industrial clusters while identifying new opportunities From 2001-2016 the mining,oil and gas extraction industries grew by 46 per cent in the Cochrane district. This district should continue to build on the natural resource clusters in their area but also recognize the importance of diversification. Developing other industries that show growth into long-term and self-sufficient industries could aid in smoothing out the cyclical nature of natural resource industries. The Timiskaming District has 1,210 more mining sector jobs in 2016 than in 2001. Timiskaming has a comparative advantage due to its easy access to natural resources and it should harness this advantage. Along with Cochrane, the Timiskaming district should also establish supporting industries that could diversify the economy and benefit the mining sector. 2. Engage the Indigenous population Indigenous people are projected to have a larger share of the working age population over the next 10 years. Improving access to education for the Indigenous population should be a key objective as those with a university degree in the Timiskaming district perform extremely well in Timiskaming District’s labour market. “Improving access to education for the Indigenous populations can encourage more workforce participation which is needed to lower the unemployment rate and to combat the projected demographic shift facing our districts in the coming years,” said Julie Joncas, the Executive Director for the Far Northeast Training Board.
[Show full text]
1 Specific Claims Tribunal Between: Timiskaming First
SCT File No.: SCT - - SPECIFIC CLAIMS TRIBUNAL B E T W E E N: TIMISKAMING FIRST NATION AND WOLF LAKE FIRST NATION Claimants v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA As represented by the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations Respondent DECLARATION OF CLAIM Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Specific Claims Tribunal Rules of Practice and Procedure This Declaration of Claim is filed under the provisions of the Specific Claims Tribunal Act and the Specific Claims Tribunal Rules of Practice and Procedure. DATE: July 3, 2020 (Registry Officer) TO: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA, As represented by the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations, Assistant Deputy Attorney General, Litigation, Justice Canada Bank of Canada Building, 234 Wellington Street East Tower Ottawa, ON K1A 0H8 Fax: (613) 954‐1920 1 SCT File No.: SCT - - I. Claimants (R. 41(a)) 1. The location of the lands which form the subject of this claim are depicted on the Map at Schedule “A” (“1849 Claim Area”). 2. The Claimants, Timiskaming First Nation (“TFN”) and Wolf Lake First Nation (“WLFN”), who file this Claim jointly, confirm that they are First Nations within the meaning of s. 2 (a) of the Specific Claims Tribunal Act (“Act”), in the Province of Quebec. 3. TFN and WLFN are part of the Algonquin Nation, whose traditional territory includes the Ottawa River valley on both sides of the current Ontario-Quebec border, which encompasses the 1849 Claim Area. Historically, the Algonquins, or groups making up the Algonquin Nation, were referred to by a variety of names including “Timiskamings” and “Tetes de Boule”, and were closely connected with the Nipissings.
[Show full text]
The Métis on the Two Banks of the Ottawa River
Journal de la Société des américanistes 106-2 | 2020 106-2 A river cuts through it: the Métis on the two banks of the Ottawa River Cette rivière qui divise au Canada : les Métis de part et d’autre de l’Outaouais Este río que divide en Canadá: el pueblo mestizo de un lado y otro del Outaouais Michel Bouchard, Sébastien Malette and Guillaume Marcotte Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/jsa/19246 DOI: 10.4000/jsa.19246 ISSN: 1957-7842 Publisher Société des américanistes Printed version Date of publication: 15 December 2020 ISSN: 0037-9174 Electronic reference Michel Bouchard, Sébastien Malette and Guillaume Marcotte, “A river cuts through it: the Métis on the two banks of the Ottawa River”, Journal de la Société des américanistes [Online], 106-2 | 2020, Online since 30 December 2020, connection on 13 March 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/jsa/ 19246 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/jsa.19246 © Société des Américanistes A river cuts through it: the Métis on the two banks of the Ottawa River Michel BOUCHARD, Sébastien MALETTE, and Guillaume MARCOTTE The Métis of Canada were included as an Aboriginal people in the Constitution Act of 1982, but in the intervening decades we have observed a great disparity in the political and legal treatment of the various Métis communities by the federal and provincial governments. The Métis of the Ottawa River are a telling case, reflective of the disparities entrenched by the provincial border separating Ontario and Quebec. In chronicling the history of this particular Métis community, primarily through unpublished sources, we demonstrate that there is a shared Métis experience and identity in Canada, but that a contiguous community has been arbitrarily divided by a provincial boundary whereby the community is recognized on one side of the divide but not the other.
[Show full text]