Detrital Blue Sodic Amphibole in Recent Sediments, Southern Coast, Turkey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Detrital Blue Sodic Amphibole in Recent Sediments, Southern Coast, Turkey J. geol. Soc. London, Vol. 138, 1981, pp. 83-92, 4 figs, 3 tables. Printed in Northern Ireland. Detrital blue sodic amphibole in Recent sediments, southern coast, Turkey M. A. Mange-Rajetzky SUMMARY:Detrital blue sodic amphibole, sporadiclawsonite and pumpellyiteoccur in beach and river sediments between Gazipasa and Manavgaton the southern Turkish coast. This area lies S of the metamorphic Alanya massif, which contributes to the detritus, but blueschists havenot previously been recorded in the region.The blue amphiboles have a provincial variation related to differing conditions during their formation. In the eastern region, in the vicinity of Gazipasaand Demirtas, homogeneous glaucophanes, sometimes with remnant Ca-amphiboles,are characteristic. In thewestern region the grainsexhibit a considerable variation of optical and physical properties and are crossitic-glaucophane, crossite and occasion- ally magnesio-riebeckite. Theefficacy of sedimentary mineralogy in reconstructing a hinterland is demonstrated. The geology of southern Turkey has attracted resear- Studies of the composite nappe system of the nearby chers for a number of years. Of particular interest is Antalya region by agroup of Frenchresearchers the region bordered by the towns Anamur, Beysehir, focussed particularly on the mode of origin and em- Isparta and Finike (Fig. l), where various nappe com- placement of the nappes of the‘Taurus occidental’ plexesindicate acomplicated geological structure. (Brunn1974; van derKaaden 1971; Monod et al. During the last 15 years several groups of geologists. 1974;Juteau 1975; Marcoux 1976;Dumont et al. applying the plate tectonic theory, have attempted to 1972; Delaune-Mayere et al. 1977 and Ricou et al. unravel its evolution in terms of a collision process. 1974, 1975, 1979). Detrital blue sodic amphibole, lawsonite and pum- Investigation of the modern sedimentsof the south- pellyite occur in river and coastal sediments between ern Turkish coast began in 1969, when a team from Gazipasa and Manavgat, supplied by riversdraining the Department of Geology,Imperial College, Lon- the metamorphic Alanya massif and its northern bor- don, in co-operation with M.T.A. (Turkish Geological derland.Blueschists indicate collision tectonics with Survey) started a comprehensive reconnaissance sur- conditions of high-pressuremetamorphism, and evi- vey of the area between Karatas and Antalya (Evans dence of their existence in the Alanya massif, where 1971).I joined the team in 1976 to investigate the they have not been recorded, has significant tectonic mineralogyand provenance of the river and coastal implications. sediments.During the course of thisanalysis blue The Alanya massif occupies the coastal range from sodic amphibole was encountered in beach and river theeastern side of Anamurto Alanya and extends sediments from around Gazipasa and as faras westward behindTertiary formations as far as the Manavgat. Manavgatriver. Thearea has not beenstudied in detail, but it is known that metamorphic rocks of the Mineralogy greenschist facies constructing the schistose group are overlain by marbles and dolomites (Blumenthal 1951; Ageneral study of beach and river sediments was Peyronnet 1971; Brunn et al. 1971; Brinkmann 1976). based on material separated from the 53 to 350 pm Locally metamorphosedbauxite alsooccurs in the sandrange. The coarser fractions are dominated by massif. Papersdescribing regional and stratigraphic lithic fragments, composite and ferruginous grain, and details include Arni (1939), Altini (1944), Blumenthal the best mineral assemblages were obtained from the (1951),Erentoz (1956), Peyronnet (1967, 1971), 53 to 212 pm range. The followingminerals were Brunn et al. (1971,1975), Argyriadis (1974) and identified: Ricou et al. (1974). Amphiboles: Blue sodic amphibole, blue-green hornblende; The northern flank of the Alanya massif as far as smallamounts of brownhornblende, tremolite-actinolite Kopriilii is in contact with the Palaeozoic-Mesozoic and grunerite. formations of the Hadim nappe which contain radio- F‘yroxenes:Augite which includesdiopsidic, acmitic and titaniferous varieties; diopside, diallage, enstatite, hypers- larites and ophiolites. From Kopriilii to the Manavgat thene. The pyroxenes usually occur in small amounts but valley units of the Antalya nappe outcropin a narrow, becomedominant, together with someolivine, W of complex zone between the Mesozoic formations of the Avsallar. Taurus Mountains and the limestones and marbles of Garnet and various micas show important local concentra- the Alanya massif. tions. 0016-7649/81/0100-0083$02.00 @ 1981 The Geological Society Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/jgs/article-pdf/138/1/83/4886977/gsjgs.138.1.0083.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 84 M. A. Mange-Rajetzky LEGEND 0 25 %ll5 “km N Scak n t Metamorphic rocks of the Alanya massif Formations of Antalya nappe Mesozoic -Tertiary comprehensive series, main/y calcareous Massive peridotites Miocene Wasse Terfiary/Ouaternary “~ectonicwindow” with units of the Antalya and Hadirn nappe Lake lNnFX MAP BLACK SEA RC. 1. Schematic geological map showingthe structural units in the vicinity of the Alanya massif. After Brunn et al. (1973), Argyriadis (1974) and M.T.A. 1: 500,000 geological map of Turkey. Characteristic metamorphic minerals include kyanite, andalu- petrologicalprovince, characterized dominantly by site and chloritoid. metamorphic minerals. The epidote group is represented by clinozoisite; epidote is The minerals indicating high-pressurelrelatively low not common. temperature metamorphism include glaucophane and Accessories are abundantin the 53-63 @m fractionand other members of theglaucophane-riebeckite series, include tourmaline, zircon, apatite, rutile, sphene, lawso- nite and pumpellyite. together with sporadic lawsonite and pumpellyite. The Light fraction: Lithic fragments, micas and quartz make up abundance of blueamphiboles wasestimated by the mass of the sediments. The grains are often stained counts of 400-500 transparent minerals per sample, withiron-hydroxide. Radiolarian chert and fragments of but no attempt was madeto calculate the absolute volcanic matrix are common around Gazipasa and Manav- weight percentages of the individual mineral species, gat. Feldspars occur in minor quantities in all samples and since theabundant opaque minerals and composite are usually represented by sodic and intermediate plagio- grainswould have obscured theimportant ‘exotic’ clase. These grainsare poorly preserved. The sediments are mineral assemblages. Thepercentage data therefore rich in calcareous fragments, but during the preparation of indicate relative percentages (Table 1, Fig. 2). the samples for heavy mineral analysis these were removed by acid treatment. In a study of the mineralogy of the sediments of the Properties of the blue amphibole southernTurkish coast (Mange-Rajetzky 1979) the heavy mineraltechnique wasused and inferences Opticalanalyses weremade on the blueamphibole madeabout the petrography of thesource areas. from 4 samples containing large amounts of this min- Characteristicheavy mineral assemblages were dis- eral (Table 1). No attempt was made to determine the tinguished and their area1 distribution, in combination refractive indices because most of the coarser grains with light mineral data, enabled them to be mapped as showedslight encrustation or disintegration on the provinces, reflecting the petrographical nature of the surface. In the case of the finerclear and well pre- hinterland. servedgrains the small size made hand-picking and The present area constitutes part of a sedimentary observation difficult. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/jgs/article-pdf/138/1/83/4886977/gsjgs.138.1.0083.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 Detrital blue sodic amphibole, southern coast, Turkey 85 LEGEND I. , , , I ,, , . 2in 264 2l8212 k0 River samples 249 252278 257 258 265 271 239234214,204 221224 228 Coastal samples 240 226 FIG. 2. Generalizedgeological map showing sample locations and mineral units. After Argyriadis (1974) and M.T.A. 1:500,000 geological map of Turkey. Diagram below illustrates the distribution of blue sodic amphibole and associated minerals in the sediments. The grains in sample 224 from the vicinity of De- All grains have a very low birefringence displaying mirtasare generally (110) cleavageflakes andare pale-grey, blue or pale greyish-yellow interference characterizedby short prismatic habit. The pleo- colours. Most exhibit zoned or mottled extinction and chroism is well expressed: 8 brightlavender-blue, y this, as well asthe (110) orientation, limited the sky-blue. On a few thin specimens a,almost colourless measuring of themain extinctionangle; grains on to pale yellow, was observed by rolling the grains on (110) show almost parallel extinction.The interference the slide. figure is usually clear and visual inspection (using the Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/jgs/article-pdf/138/1/83/4886977/gsjgs.138.1.0083.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 86 M. A. Mange-Rajetzky TABLE1: Percentages of blue sodic amphibole in some beach and river sediments Mouth of Mouth of Mouth of Manaugat Ir. Locality Sedre Cay Afara Cay Karpuz Irmagi Riuer sand Sample No, 224 257 252 281 Size grade (pm) 53-63 25.1 17.0 13.3 12.5 63-125 15.3 3.0 12.2 7.9 125-210 14.7 6.1 10.2 3.4 210-300 2.3 11.1 12.3 1.7 0 0 0 1.0 0 0 300-350 0 Percentage of total grains counted in 53-300 15.9 12.3 10.7 5.9 data in Phillips 1971, p. 145) showed a range of the 2V varying within a
Recommended publications
  • SCHEDULE of DIVINE SERVICES- MAY 2021 in the CHURCH of Alanya
    SCHEDULE OF DIVINE SERVICES- MAY 2021 IN THE CHURCH OF Alanya 1 Sat Great Saturday. Venerable John, disciple of St. Gregory of Decapolis (820) 09.00 Vespers and Divine Liturgy of St. Basil the Great 2 Sun The Bright Resurrection of Christ, The Pascha of the Lord.. Easter/Pascha 22.00 (Saturday night) Beginning of the Paschal Service. 11.00 (Sunday morning) The Vespers of Love THE BLESSING OF PASCHAL PRODUCTS WILL BE CONDUCTED BY AGREEMENT Bright Week – Fast-free 3 Mon Venerable Theodore Trichinas (599), St. Nicholas (Velimirovich), bishop of Ochrid and Zhicha,Serbia (1956). St. George, Bishop of Antioch (in Pisidia) 4 Tue "Iveron" Icon of the Most Holy Theotokos. Hieromartyr Theodore of Perge in Pamphylia, his mother Philippa, and Martyrs Dioscorus, Socrates, and Dionysius. 5 Wed Venerable Theodore the Sykeote (613). Venerable Vitalis (609-620). 6 Thu Holy Glorious Great-martyr, Victory-bearer and Wonderworker George (303). Martyr Alexandra the Empress, wife of Diocletian (314). 09.00 Paschal Dicine Liturgy 7 Fri "Life- giving Spring" Icon of the Most Holy Theotokos. 8 Sat Holy Apostle and Evangelist Mark (63). Venerable Sylvester (1379). 09.00 Paschal Divine Liturgy 17.00 All-Nigh Vigil 9 Sun Antipascha, St. Thomas Sunday. Hieromartyr Basil, bishop of Amasea (ca. 322). St. Stephen, bishop of Perm (1396). 08.30 Hours, Confession 09.00 Divine Liturgy 10 Mon Hieromartyr Symeon the Kinsman of the Lord. St. Eulogius the Hospitable of Constantinople. Venerable Stephen, abbot of the Kiev Caves (1094). 1 11 Tue Radonitsa, the Commemoration of the Departed. Apostles Jason of the Seventy (I).
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Bölüm Antalya'nin Jeolojisi Ve Depremselliği
    TMMOB İNŞAAT MÜHENDİSLERİ ODASI ANTALYA ŞUBESİ 4. BÖLÜM ANTALYA’NIN JEOLOJİSİ VE DEPREMSELLİĞİ 4.1. ANTALYA’NIN COĞRAFİ ÖZELLİĞİ Antalya, Türkiye’nin güneyinde, Akdeniz kıyısında yer almaktadır. Antalya, Burdur ve Isparta illerinin oluşturduğu Batı Akdeniz Bölgesinin en büyük kenti ve merkezi konumundadır. Kıyı kenti ve turizm merkezi olan Antalya’nın körfezi, asimetrik olup güney doğuda Gazipaşa ile güney batıda Yardımcı Burnu arasındaki uzunluğu yaklaşık 280 km. dır. Türkiye topraklarının %2.6’sını oluşturan Antalya İlinde ülke nüfusunun %2.5’i yaşamaktadır. Antalya İli’nin; Merkezi İlçe, Akseki, Alanya, Elmalı, Finike, Gazipaşa, Gündoğmuş, İbradi, Kale, Kaş, Kemer, Korkuteli, Kumluca, Manavgat ve Serik olmak üzere 15 ilçe, 19 bucak ve 545 köyü bulunmaktadır. İlin toplam yüzölçümü 20.723 km2 dir.(4) 4.2. ANTALYA’NIN JEOLOJİSİ VE TEKTONİĞİ Antalya bölgesinde Prekambriye’den günümüze kadar oluşmuş kaya birimleri yüzeylenir. Oldukça farklı ortam koşullarında gelişmiş olan bu kaya birimlerinin bir kısmı otokton, bir kısmı ise allokton konumludur. Antalya bölgesinin batı ve kuzey batısında Beydağları otoktonu, kuzey doğusunda ise Anamas – Akseki otoktonu yeralır. Beydağları otoktonun yaşlı kaya birimleri üzerinde Paleosen ve Eosen çökelekleri bazı alanlarda sığ deniz ortamında çökelmiş karbonatlarla temsil edilirken, bazı alanlarda daha derin deniz ortamında çökelmiş kumtaşı, kiltaşı, kireçtaşı vb. kaya türleri ile temsil edilir. Beydağları otoktonu Daniyen’de Antalya naplarının, Langiyen’de de Likya naplarının yerleşimine sahne olmuştur. Anamas - Akseki otoktonun yaşlı kaya birimleri üzerinde Orta - Üst Triyas yaşlı kumtaşı, kireçtaşı ve şeyl’ler, bu şeyl’ler üzerinde de genellikle Jura - Kretase yaşlı kireçtaşları bulunur. Paleosen-Eosen, Anamas - Akseki otoktonunda kireçtaşı ve kırıntılı kayalarla temsil edilir. Anamas - Akseki otoktonunu güney kenarında Daniyen’de Antalya napları ve Alanya napı yerleşmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Tariffs for 2020
    TARIFFS FOR 2020 Tariff Name Page 1 Tariff For International Landing, Stopover, Lighting and Approaching 3 2 Tariff For Domestic Landing, Stopover, Lighting and Approaching 6 3 Tariff For Passenger Services 9 4 Tariff For Safety Precation 11 5 Tariff For Aircraft / Vehicles Marshalling 12 6 Tariff For Extension Of Airport Working Hours 14 7 Tariff For Passenger Boarding Bridge Services 15 8 Tariff For Ground Handling Services 17 9 Tariff For Refueling Concession 21 10 Tariff For Apron Vehicle Private Plate 22 11 Tariff For Entry Cards 25 12 Tariff For Communication Systems 28 13 Tariff For Communication System Allocation and Infrastructure Rights 30 14 Tariff For Power, Water, Sewerage, HVAC 32 15 Tariff For Tools, Equipment, Materials Allocation 36 16 Tariff For Terminal Area Allocation 39 17 Tariff For Land and Other Building Spaces Allocation 45 18 Tariff For Check-In, Transit Counters, Kiosk and Information Desks 47 19 Tariff For Flight Information Display System Usage 50 20 Tariff For Car Park 51 21 Tariff For Video and Photograph Shooting 55 22 Tariff For General Aviation Terminal 56 23 Tariff For Porter 58 24 Tariff For Medical Services 59 25 Tariff For Baggage Room Services 60 26 Tariff For Baggage Tracking Service 61 Activation : This tariff becomes valid upon the approval of General Directorate of State Airports Authority (DHMI) with effect from 1st January 2020 and it remains valid until the new tariff. Legal Disclaimer : These tariffs are valid for Airport/Terminal Operators. The official transcript of this text is in Turkish. The text in Turkish is applied in any legal dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-2022 Voleybol Sezonu 1. Lig Erkekler a Grubu Kura Çekimi
    11 AĞUSTOS 2021 - ANKARA 2021-2022 VOLEYBOL SEZONU 1. LİG ERKEKLER A GRUBU KURA ÇEKİMİ İL TAKIM ADI KURA NO 1. Hafta ANTALYA ALANYA BLD. 12 ALANYA BLD. SAİNT JOSEPH AYDIN AYDIN B.ŞEHİR BLD. 4 ÜRGÜP SPOR İSTANBUL BBSK BALIKESİR BİGADİÇ BLD. 3 MİLAS BLD. KÜTAHYA BLD. BURSA HEKİMOĞLU GCT BURSA VOL. İHT. 5 BİGADİÇ BLD. JEOPARK KULA BLD. İSTANBUL İSTANBUL BBSK 10 KONYA B.ŞEHİR BLD. AYDIN B.ŞEHİR BLD. İZMİR SAİNT JOSEPH 11 HEKİMOĞLU GCT BURSA VOL.KOCAELİ İHT. BŞB KAĞIT SPOR KOCAELİ KOCAELİ BŞB KAĞIT SPOR 6 KONYA KONYA B.ŞEHİR BLD. 7 1.DEVRE : 09 EKİM 2021 CMT-18 ARALIK 2021 CMT KÜTAHYA KÜTAHYA BLD. 2 2.DEVRE : 09 OCAK 2022 PZR-20 MART 2022 PZR MANİSA JEOPARK KULA BLD. 8 YARI FİNAL : MART/NİSAN 2022 MUĞLA MİLAS BLD. 9 FİNAL : NİSAN 2022 NEVŞEHİR ÜRGÜP SPOR 1 1. Hafta 9 Ekim 2021 Cumartesi 2. Hafta 16 Ekim 2021 Cumartesi 3. Hafta 23 Ekim 2021 Cumartesi ALANYA BLD. SAİNT JOSEPH İSTANBUL BBSK ALANYA BLD. ALANYA BLD. MİLAS BLD. ÜRGÜP SPOR İSTANBUL BBSK SAİNT JOSEPH MİLAS BLD. İSTANBUL BBSK JEOPARK KULA BLD. MİLAS BLD. KÜTAHYA BLD. JEOPARK KULA BLD. ÜRGÜP SPOR KONYA B.ŞEHİR BLD. SAİNT JOSEPH BİGADİÇ BLD. JEOPARK KULA BLD. KÜTAHYA BLD. KONYA B.ŞEHİR BLD. ÜRGÜP SPOR KOCAELİ BŞB KAĞIT SPOR KONYA B.ŞEHİR BLD. AYDIN B.ŞEHİR BLD. KOCAELİ BŞB KAĞIT SPOR BİGADİÇ BLD. HEKİMOĞLU GCT BURSA VOL.KÜTAHYA İHT. BLD. HEKİMOĞLU GCT BURSA VOL.KOCAELİ İHT. BŞB KAĞIT SPOR AYDIN B.ŞEHİR BLD. HEKİMOĞLU GCT BURSA VOL.BİGADİÇ İHT. BLD. AYDIN B.ŞEHİR BLD.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Dr. Orhan AYDIN Rektör DAĞITIM Üniversitemiz Uygulamalı
    Evrak Tarih ve Sayısı: 02.03.2021-9857 T.C. TARSUS ÜNİVERSİTESİ REKTÖRLÜĞÜ Genel Sekreterlik Sayı : E-66676008-051.01-84 02.03.2021 Konu : Kongre Duyurusu DAĞITIM Üniversitemiz Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi ev sahipliğinde, Mersin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi, Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi ve Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi işbirliği ile ortaklaşa düzenlenen 08-09 Ekim 2021 tarihleri arasında çevrimiçi olarak gerçekleştirilecek olan “ Uluslararası Dijital İşletme, Yönetim ve İktisat Kongresi (International Digital Business, Management And Economics Congress)’ne ilişkin afiş görseli ekte gönderilmekte olup kongre hakkındaki detaylı bilgilere icdbme2021.tarsus.edu.tr adresinden ulaşılabilecektir. Söz konusu kongrenin kurumunuz ilgili birimlerine ve akademik personeline duyurulması hususunda ; Bilgilerinizi ve gereğini arz ederim. Prof. Dr. Orhan AYDIN Rektör Ek : Afiş (2 Sayfa) Dağıtım : Abdullah Gül Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Adana Alparslan Türkeş Bilim ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Adıyaman Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Akdeniz Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Aksaray Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Alanya Hamdullah Emin Paşa Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Amasya Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Anadolu Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Anka
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical World
    MAPS of the PAUL’SBIBLICAL MISSIONARY JOURNEYS WORLD MILAN VENICE ZAGREB ROMANIA BOSNA & BELGRADE BUCHAREST HERZEGOVINA CROATIA SAARAJEVO PISA SERBIA ANCONA ITALY Adriatic SeaMONTENEGRO PRISTINA Black Sea PODGORICA BULGARIA PESCARA KOSOVA SOFIA ROME SINOP SKOPJE Sinope EDIRNE Amastris Three Taverns FOGGIA MACEDONIA PONTUS SAMSUN Forum of Appius TIRANA Philippi ISTANBUL Amisos Neapolis TEKIRDAG AMASYA NAPLES Amphipolis Byzantium Hattusa Tyrrhenian Sea Thessalonica Amaseia ORDU Puteoli TARANTO Nicomedia SORRENTO Pella Apollonia Marmara Sea ALBANIA Nicaea Tavium BRINDISI Beroea Kyzikos SAPRI CANAKKALE BITHYNIA ANKARA Troy BURSA Troas MYSIA Dorylaion Gordion Larissa Aegean Sea Hadrianuthera Assos Pessinous T U R K E Y Adramytteum Cotiaeum GALATIA GREECE Mytilene Pergamon Aizanoi CATANZARO Thyatira CAPPADOCIA IZMIR ASIA PHRYGIA Prymnessus Delphi Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Mazaka Sardis PALERMO Ionian Sea Athens Antioch Pisidia MESSINA Nysa Hierapolis Rhegium Corinth Ephesus Apamea KONYA COMMOGENE Laodicea TRAPANI Olympia Mycenae Samos Tralles Iconium Aphrodisias Arsameia Epidaurus Sounion Colossae CATANIA Miletus Lystra Patmos CARIA SICILY Derbe ADANA GAZIANTEP Siracuse Sparta Halicarnassus ANTALYA Perge Tarsus Cnidus Cos LYCIA Attalia Side CILICIA Soli Korakesion Korykos Antioch Patara Mira Seleucia Rhodes Seleucia Malta Anemurion Pieria CRETE MALTA Knosos CYPRUS Salamis TUNISIA Fair Haven Paphos Kition Amathous SYRIA Kourion BEIRUT LEBANON PAUL’S MISSIONARY JOURNEYS DAMASCUS Prepared by Mediterranean Sea Sidon FIRST JOURNEY : Nazareth SECOND
    [Show full text]
  • Mersin – Adana Planlama Bölgesi 1/100.000 Ölçekli Çevre Düzeni Plani Revizyonu (Mersin Ili)
    T.C. ÇEVRE ve ŞEHİRCİLİK BAKANLIĞI MEKANSAL PLANLAMA GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ MERSİN – ADANA PLANLAMA BÖLGESİ 1/100.000 ÖLÇEKLİ ÇEVRE DÜZENİ PLANI REVİZYONU (MERSİN İLİ) PLAN AÇIKLAMA RAPORU T.C. ÇEVRE VE ŞEHİRCİLİK BAKANLIĞI MEKÂNSAL PLANLAMA GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ MERSİN-ADANA PLANLAMA BÖLGESİ 1/100.000 ÖLÇEKLİ ÇEVRE DÜZENİ PLANI REVİZYONU (MERSİN İLİ) İÇİNDEKİLER 1. GİRİŞ .................................................................................................................................... 1 2. AMAÇ -KAPSAM .................................................................................................................... 2 2.1. Planın Amacı ............................................................................................................................ 2 2.2. Planın Kapsamı ........................................................................................................................ 2 3. PLANLAMA YAKLAŞIMI .......................................................................................................... 3 3.1. Vizyon ...................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2. Planlama İlkeleri ...................................................................................................................... 5 3.3. Planlama Hedefleri .................................................................................................................. 6 4. PLAN KARARLARI .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Groupe ADP Intends to Increase Its Stake in TAV Airports and to Sell Its Stake in TAV Construction
    9 June 2017 Aéroports de Paris SA Groupe ADP intends to increase its stake in TAV Airports and to sell its stake in TAV Construction Aéroports de Paris SA, mother company of Groupe ADP, though its subsidiary Tank ÖWA alpha GmbH, entered into a share purchase agreement, signed on 9 June 2017, with Akfen Holding A.Ş. ("Akfen Holding") for the acquisition of Akfen Holding’s whole stake in TAV Havalimanları Holding A.Ş. ("TAV Havalimanları Holding" or "TAV Airports"). Groupe ADP has been a 38% shareholder of TAV Airports since 2012. With this transaction, Groupe ADP will acquire an 8.12% stake in TAV Airports, for an amount of USD160 million. The transaction values TAV Havalimanları Holding's equity at around USD2.0 billion, equivalent to TRY19.2 per share. This project of acquisition will increase Groupe ADP’s commitment in the company, with a stake brought to 46.12% of TAV Airports' share capital. Tepe İnşaat Sanayi A.Ş. and Sera Yapi Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.Ş., the other two key founding shareholders of TAV Airports, have expressed their support in favour of this transaction and its prospects for TAV Airports. Meanwhile, Groupe ADP will sell its 49%-stake in TAV Investment, mother company of TAV Yatırım Holding A.Ş. ("TAV Construction"), to Sera Yapi Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.Ş. and Tepe İnşaat Sanayi A.Ş. for an amount of EUR9 million. Groupe ADP is thus deploying its international strategy, on the one hand, by increasing its commitment in the airport group TAV Airports as leading shareholder and, on the other hand, at refocusing its activities on its core business with the disposal of its stake in TAV Construction.
    [Show full text]
  • PAUL's LITTLE KNOWN MINISTRY in CILICIA May 25
    Tutku Travel Programs Endorsed by Biblical Archaeology Society PAUL’S LITTLE KNOWN MINISTRY IN CILICIA Tour Host: Dr. Mark R. Fairchild • May 25 - June 4, 2020 organized by Paul’s Little Known Ministry in Cilicia / May 25 - June 4, 2020 Seleucia Pieria PAUL’S LITTLE KNOWN MINISTRY IN CILICIA Dr. Mark R. Fairchild, Ph.D., Luke J. Peters Prof. of Biblical Studies Chair Dept. Bible & Religion Huntington University May 29 Fri Tarsus – Mersin The apostle Paul came from the ancient Turkish city of Tarsus and spent his See the newly renovated Adana Museum and the large Roman bridge crossing the early years there learning the Greek language and Greco-Roman culture. Ceyhan (Pyramus) River. Drive to Paul’s hometown of Tarsus and see the Roman He continued his education in Jerusalem, but Paul returned to Tarsus after he road through the Taurus Mts., the Roman street excavation, the Roman bridge, converted to Christianity (Acts 9:30). There, Paul spent the next seven to nine the Roman baths, the Donuktas and the waterfalls at the ancient necropolis. Hotel years sharing the Gospel with the people of Syria and Cilicia. This little known in Mersin. (B, D) ministry was unmentioned by Luke when he wrote Acts, but Paul briefly mentioned it in Galatians 1:21 and it is implied by a passage in Acts 15:41. Join us on a trip to Eloussia Sebaste Aqueduct Paul’s hometown and the places of Paul’s earliest ministry. See some of the earliest Jewish synagogues and the beauty of the Taurus Mountains. St. Peter Church, Antioch May 30 Sat Mersin – Ayas Drive to Mersin and see the ruins of ancient Solei (Pompeiopolis), continue southwest to the ancient city of Elaiussa Sebaste, with its marketplace, theater, harbor and necropolis.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Ilçe Nüfus Sayisi Mevcut Eczane Sayisi Max
    MEVCUT MAX. NÜFUS KONTENJAN İL İLÇE ECZANE AÇILABİLECEK KATSAYI SAYISI SAYISI SAYISI ECZANE SAYISI ADANA ALADAĞ 17221 3 4 1 5 ADANA CEYHAN 159243 49 45 -4 3 ADANA ÇUKUROVA 346505 103 99 -4 0 ADANA FEKE 18534 3 5 2 6 ADANA İMAMOĞLU 29748 11 8 -3 3 ADANA KARAİSALI 22230 7 6 -1 5 ADANA KARATAŞ 21862 4 6 2 3 ADANA KOZAN 128153 44 36 -8 3 ADANA POZANTI 20954 7 5 -2 3 ADANA SAİMBEYLİ 16572 3 4 1 5 ADANA SARIÇAM 138139 30 39 9 0 ADANA SEYHAN 771947 273 220 -53 1 ADANA TUFANBEYLİ 18234 3 5 2 5 ADANA YUMURTALIK 18463 2 5 3 3 ADANA YÜREĞİR 421455 112 120 8 1 ADIYAMAN BESNİ 77404 14 22 8 4 ADIYAMAN ÇELİKHAN 15387 2 4 2 4 ADIYAMAN GERGER 21458 2 6 4 6 ADIYAMAN GÖLBAŞI 47406 13 13 0 3 ADIYAMAN KAHTA 117865 25 33 8 5 ADIYAMAN MERKEZ 279037 79 79 0 3 ADIYAMAN SAMSAT 9180 1 2 1 4 ADIYAMAN SİNCİK 18750 1 5 4 6 ADIYAMAN TUT 10697 2 3 1 5 AFYONKARAHİSAR BAŞMAKÇI 10541 3 3 0 3 AFYONKARAHİSAR BAYAT 8280 2 2 0 4 AFYONKARAHİSAR BOLVADİN 45710 14 13 -1 3 AFYONKARAHİSAR ÇAY 33354 11 9 -2 3 AFYONKARAHİSAR ÇOBANLAR 14105 3 4 1 4 AFYONKARAHİSAR DAZKIRI 11193 3 3 0 3 AFYONKARAHİSAR DİNAR 48687 21 13 -8 3 AFYONKARAHİSAR EMİRDAĞ 38991 9 11 2 3 AFYONKARAHİSAR EVCİLER 7842 3 2 -1 3 AFYONKARAHİSAR HOCALAR 10520 1 3 2 5 AFYONKARAHİSAR İHSANİYE 28767 6 8 2 4 AFYONKARAHİSAR İSCEHİSAR 24363 4 6 2 3 AFYONKARAHİSAR KIZILÖREN 2643 1 0 -1 4 AFYONKARAHİSAR MERKEZ 268461 97 76 -21 2 AFYONKARAHİSAR SANDIKLI 57211 19 16 -3 3 AFYONKARAHİSAR SİNANPAŞA 41914 8 11 3 4 AFYONKARAHİSAR SULTANDAĞI 16480 9 4 -5 3 AFYONKARAHİSAR ŞUHUT 38061 7 10 3 4 AĞRI DİYADİN 45395 4 12 8 6 AĞRI DOĞUBAYAZIT
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    This PDF is a simplified version of the original article published in Internet Archaeology. All links also go to the online version. Please cite this as: Atalan Çayırezmez, N., Hacigüzeller, P. and Kalayci, T. 2021 Archaeological Digital Archiving in Turkey, Internet Archaeology 58. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.58.20 Archaeological Digital Archiving in Turkey Nurdan Atalan Çayırezmez, Piraye Hacıgüzeller and Tuna Kalayci Summary This article provides a brief overview of archaeological digital archiving in Turkey. It introduces the legal framework and the stakeholders involved in conducting archaeological excavations and surveys. The current situation in archiving born-digital and digitised documentation produced during archaeological fieldwork is then introduced. Existing repositories serving as hubs for archaeological and heritage archiving are listed and briefly discussed. Analysis of online publishing practices for archaeological digital resources points to an eclectic landscape that only minimally complies with the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles. We conclude that guidelines for best practice in metadata and semantic technologies, locally applicable standards (especially controlled vocabularies), technical know-how, and a larger acceptance of open data and scholarship remain much-needed assets for archaeological digital archiving in Turkey. We also conclude that the future promises progress towards more interoperable archaeological digital archives thanks to international training, network and knowledge transfer opportunities (e.g. SEADDA Project). 1. Archaeology in Turkey All immovable and movable cultural assets in the Republic of Turkey are state property whose protection is ensured by the Turkish State under the Constitution (Constitution of the Republic of Turkey, 1982, Article 63). Definitions of immovable and movable cultural assets are stipulated in the Law on the Conservation of Cultural and Natural Property (No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Multi-Sport Events on the Developmental Dynamics Of
    38 Planlama 2017;27(1):38–56 | doi: 10.14744/planlama.2016.43534 ARTICLE / ARAŞTIRMA The Impact of Multi-Sport Events on the Developmental Dynamics of Cities: the Case of Erzurum, Trabzon and Mersin in Turkey Türkiye’deki Çoklu Spor Organizasyonlarının Kentlerin Gelişimine Etkileri: Erzurum, Trabzon ve Mersin Örnekleri Servet Karaca, Burak Beyhan Department of City and Regional Planning, Mersin University Faculty of Architecture, Mersin, Turkey ABSTRACT ÖZ Nowadays, in Turkey as well as in other parts of the world the ten- Günümüzde, dünyanın başka bölgelerinde olduğu gibi Türkiye’de dency of hosting mega events has increased owing to the employ- de büyük ölçekli etkinliğe ev sahipliği yapma eğilimi, özellikle mar- ment of particularly branding promotion, marketing, and attracting kalaşma, tanıtım, pazarlama ve yatırım fonlarını, yerel ve bölgesel investment funds as a tool for the local and regional development. kalkınmanın bir aracı olarak kullanılmasıyla artmıştır. Bu strateji This strategy has become an important tool of urban and regional sanayisizleşme sorunu yaşayan ülkelerde kentsel ve bölgesel kal- development in the countries suffering from de-industrialization, kınmanın önemli bir aracı haline gelmiştir ve ilgili ülkelerde son and it has been widely used in the respective countries to trigger 30 yıldır ekonomik kalkınmayı tetiklemek için yaygın olarak kul- the economic development for the last 30 years. Some of the cit- lanılmaktadır. Türkiye’de kentlerin bazıları, 2000’li yılların orta- ies in Turkey have been hosting some of these international events sından itibaren bu uluslararası etkinliklere ev sahipliği yapmıştır. since the mid 2000s. Within this context, this study elaborates Bu kapsamda, bu çalışma Türkiye’de son yıllarda gerçekleştirilen the impacts of Erzurum, Trabzon and Mersin multi-sport events Erzurum, Trabzon ve Mersin çoklu-spor etkinliklerinin etkilerini recently hold in Turkey.
    [Show full text]