INFORMATION MEMORANDUM

315 & 335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

For Sale by Private Treaty August 2019

INTRODUCTION

Sachii have been appointed by our clients to market the sale of 315 and 335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court which will be available for sale by Private Treaty.

This Information Memorandum provides preliminary information to assist interested parties with their assessment of the property.

This Information Memorandum is produced as a general guide only and does not constitute valuation advice nor an offer for sale or purchase. All plans and images are subject to confirmation via the Sales Contract. All parties should undertake and rely on their own independent due diligence investigations and not rely on the information contained in this document to make their purchasing decision.

Sales Process Sachii is proud to offer 315 and 335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court for sale by private treaty.

Contact Hawre Ahmad Director, Licensed Real Estate Agent M 0498 088 888 E [email protected]

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This property is the last remaining land of its size close to Willowdale and local amenities – this is a never to be repeated opportunity for developers, property groups and investors alike. Currently zoned Environmental Living - E4 and/or potential for rezoning proposal for R2 zoning or community title development – subject to council approval.

Address 315 and 335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court NSW 2565

Legal Lot 131 and 312 DP1137588

Site Area 3.834 hectares | 38,340sqm approx

Zoning Environmental Living - E4

Location The property is located directly beside the award winning Willowdale development, within 5 minutes’ drive to and Edmondson Park station. The site is serviced by a range of education options and lies within close proximity to restaurants, healthcare, public transport and amenities.

Description - 2 x residential homes presently onsite - The last remaining large land opportunity next to Willowdale - Surrounded by fast going residential markets - South West growth centre - Close proximity to Edmondson Town Centre - 3 property boundaries zoned R2 - Potential rezoning proposal (stca) - Potential higher density development under Community Title

THE OPPORTUNITY

Land Subdivision / Development Opportunity The last remaining large land parcel beside the award winning Willowdale development. Currently zoned Environmental Living - E4 zoned.

Potential for rezoning (subject to council approval) ► 3 boundaries on the site are along R2 zoned land; ► Denham Court has undergone dramatic development; ► Stockland’s Willowdale precinct is directly across from the site; ► water have provided sewer to the site; ► Biodiversity Certification which is particularly suitable where strategic land use planning is proposed or underway.

Buyer demand There is a consistent strong demand for housing and land within the Denham Court precinct, particularly with the increasing infrastructure and developments in the area and surrounds.

The upcoming Badgerys Creek airport and the surrounding aerotropolis is expected to be a significant job creator, Anna Porter, valuer, property commentator and CEO of Suburbanite has stated, with industrial, commercial and retail developments expected to funnel through population and income growth. Liverpool and Campbelltown-Macarthur areas are also expected to experience growth off the aerotropolis. Western Sydney hubs are seeing universities anchoring their presence and also partnering with local hospitals to facilitate health and education opportunities in these locations.

Location and proximity to amenities Primely situated on the highly sought-after Denham Court Road, the site offers broad exposure to a range of essential amenities. Directly opposite the award winning Willowdale development with amenities, parks, transport and within close proximity to schooling.

LOCATION

This property is ideally located in the suburb of Denham Court, on the highly sought-after Denham Court Road in South West Sydney. The property is positioned opposite the award winning Willowdale Development offering arrange of retail, amenities, parks and school options to the local community.

Leppington Station, Edmondson Park station and town centre all lie within a 5-minute drive from the site putting commuters within easy reach of amenities as well as major arterial roads allowing easy accessibility to Liverpool and Sydney CBDs. Camden Valley Way and Campbelltown Road provide road links to the Campbelltown, Liverpool and region, while the M7 Motorway provides access to the west and Hills District. The M5 motorway is situated in close proximity providing a direct link to the Sydney CBD as well as the Sydney International Airport and eastern suburbs.

Amenities within the area include an array of schools – Leppington and Bardia Public Schools, John Edmondson High School, Western Sydney University campuses at Campbelltown and Liverpool and the University of Wollongong campus at Liverpool. Amenities within the Willowdale development include medical amenities, parks as well as children’s playgrounds, bbq area and tracks.

The site is well placed to access essential services and necessary amenities, including hospitals, supermarkets and shopping centres.

DEMOGRAPHICS Household Structure

Type Percent Childless Couples 48.1 Couples with Children 44.8 Single Parents 5.6

Statistics are provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)

Household Structure

Household Occupancy

Type Percent Owns Outright 35.2 Purchaser 34.2 Renting 14.8 Other 12.1 Not Stated 3.9

Statistics are provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)

Household Occupancy

Household Income

Income Range Denham Court % Campbelltown % 0-15.6K 13.6 3.6 15.6-33.8K 8.6 12.6 33.8-52K 9.3 13.6 52-78K 8.8 16.5 78-130K 18.0 25.1 130-182K 10.7 11.4 182K+ 19.7 7.4

Statistics are provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)

Household Income

PHOTOS

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this Information Memorandum has been prepared in good faith with due care by Sachii Real Estate and the Vendor (including their related bodies corporate), solely for the information of potential purchasers to assist them in deciding whether they are interested in the premises offered for sale by acquiring an interest in the managed investment scheme; the information does not form part of any offer or contract and is intended as a guide only; you should not rely on any material contained herein but should make independent investigations to satisfy yourselves as to the correctness of any statements or representations; all calculations, including, but not limited to dimensions, area and rent, contained in the material are based on figures provided to Sachii Real Estate and the Vendor by outside sources and have not been independently verified by Sachii Real Estate and the Vendor and therefore may not be correct; and no representation or warranty is made by Sachii Real Estate or the Vendor as to the accuracy of the material, in whole or part. No liability for negligence or otherwise is assumed by Sachii Real Estate and the Vendor, for the material contained herein. Any liability on the part of Sachii Real Estate or the Vendor, their servants or agents for damages for any claim by a potential purchaser arising out of or in connection with this material, other than liability which is totally excluded by this clause, will not (whether or not such liability results from or involves negligence) exceed $1,000.00. The property will be traded or sold “as is” and “with all faults”, without any representation or warranty as to its condition, fitness for any particular purpose or compliance with any relevant law. The Vendor reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to postpone or cancel the proposed trade or sale of the property and to modify or add any terms and conditions to any proposed contract or other material associated with the proposed sale, which may be made available to a potential purchase.

ANNEXURE 1 – PROPOSED R2 LAYOUT – CONCEPT ONLY

ANNEXURE 2 – CURRENT ZONING MAP

ANNEXURE 3 – SYDNEY WATER RECORD

ANNEXURE 4 – DENHAM COURT ROAD WIDENING

ANNEXURE 5 – DENHAM COURT LEASE AREA

ANNEXURE 6 – EXISTING SURVEY REPORT

ANNEXURE 7 – DENHAM COURT ROAD WIDENING

ACQUISITION AREA

ANNEXURE 8 – STORM WATER EASEMENT

Note: - This is an above ground easement and the purpose of it was purely for stormwater from Willowdale. Stockland have a current DA which include the request for the removal of this easement.

ANNEXURE 9 – CONTAMINATION REPORT

Preliminary Site Investigation

315-335 Denham Court Road Denham Court, NSW 2565

Group Development Services Pty Ltd

DL3886_S005263

September, 2016

PROJECT NAME 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court, NSW 2565

PROJECT ID DL3886

DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER S005263

PREPARED FOR Group Development Services Pty Ltd

APPROVED FOR RELEASE BY Simon Spyrdz

DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This report is subject to the copyright statement located at www.pacific-environment.com © Pacific Environment Operations Pty Ltd ABN 86 127 101 642

DOCUMENT CONTROL

VERSION DATE COMMENT PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY

Version 1.0 06.09.16 Russell Jarman Sally King

DLA Environmental Services Pty Ltd: ABN 80 601 661 634

BRISBANE SYDNEY Level 1, 59 Melbourne Street, South Brisbane, Qld 4101 Suite 1, Level 1, 146 Arthur Street PO Box 3306, South Brisbane, Qld 4101 North Sydney, NSW 2060 Ph: +61 7 3004 6400 Ph: +61 2 9870 0900 Ph: +61 7 3004 6400 Fax: +61 2 9870 0999

Unit 1, 22 Varley Street DLA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Yeerongpilly, Qld 4105 Unit 3, 38 Leighton Place Ph: +61 7 3004 6460 Hornsby, NSW 2077 Ph: +61 2 9476 1765 ADELAIDE Fax: +61 2 9476 1557 35 Edward Street, Norwood SA 5067 PO Box 3187, Norwood, SA 5067 42B Church St Ph: +61 8 8332 0960 Maitland NSW 2320 Fax: +61 7 3844 5858 Ph: +61 2 4933 0001

PERTH MELBOURNE Level 1, Suite 3 Level 10, 224 Queen Street 34 Queen Street, Perth, WA 6000 Melbourne, Vic 3000 Ph: +61 8 9481 4961 Ph: +61 3 9036 2637 Fax: +61 2 9870 0999 Fax: +61 2 9870 0999

Project ID: DL3879 i 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

DISCLAIMER

DLA Environmental Services (DLA) acts in all professional matters as a faithful advisor to the Client and exercises all reasonable skill and care in the provision of its professional services. Reports are commissioned by and prepared for the exclusive use of the Client. They are subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between the Client and DLA. DLA is not responsible for any liability and accepts no responsibility whatsoever arising from the misapplication or misinterpretation by third parties of the contents of its reports. Reports cannot be copied or reproduced in whole or part for any purpose without the prior written agreement of DLA.

The conclusions presented in this report are relevant to the present condition of the Site and the state of legislation currently enacted as at the date of this report. DLA do not make any representation or warranty that the conclusions in this report will be applicable in the future as there may be changes in the condition of the Site, applicable legislation or other factors that would affect the conclusions contained in this report.

This report is limited to the scope defined herein. Sampling and chemical analysis of environmental media are based on representative samples, the intensity of those samples being in accordance with the usual levels of testing carried out for this type of investigation and appropriate for the objectives of this report. Due to the inherent variability in environmental media, DLA cannot warrant that the whole overall condition of the Site is identical or substantially similar to the representative samples.

Project ID: DL3879 ii 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

ABBREVIATIONS

ACM Asbestos Containing Material AHD Australian Height Datum ANZECC Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council ASS Acid Sulfate Soil B(a)P Benzo(a)Pyrene BGL Below Ground Level BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, Xylene COC Chain of Custody documentation CLM Contaminated Land Management DA Development Application DEC Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) DECC Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW) DECCW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (NSW) DLA DLA Environmental Services DP Deposited Plan DQO Data Quality Objective EC Electrical Conductivity EIL Ecological Investigation Level EMP Environmental Management Plan EPA Environment Protection Authority (NSW) ESL Ecological Screening Level HIL Health-Based Investigation Level LOR Limit of Reporting NATA National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia NEPC National Environment Protection Council NEPM National Environment Protection Measure NHMRC National Health and Medical Research Council NSW OCP Organochlorine Pesticides OEH Office of Environmental and Heritage OPP Organophosphorus Pesticides OH&S Occupational Health and Safety PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyls PID Photo-Ionisation Detector PQL Practical Quantification Limit QA/QC Quality Assurance and Quality Control RAP Remedial Action Plan RPD Relative Percentage Difference SAC Site Acceptance Criteria SAQP Sampling Analysis and Quality Plan SEPP State Environmental Planning Policy SWL Standing Water Level TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure TRH Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons UCL Upper Confidence Limit UST Underground Storage Tank VOC Volatile Organic Compounds WHS Work Health Safety

Project ID: DL3879 iii 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DLA Environmental Services (DLA) was engaged by Group Development Services Pty Ltd to conduct a Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) of the following area:

315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court, NSW 2565 (the Site).

The PSI was commissioned to serve as supporting documentation for the issue of a residential redevelopment Development Approval (DA) Consent. The conditions require a comprehensive environmental site assessment to be submitted to Council characterising potential contamination and the Site, drawing conclusions on the suitability of the Site for its proposed land use and making recommendations to enable such conclusions.

A historical Site land use and activity assessment was conducted on the Site. The surrounding land use and previous owners included graizers and dairy farmers. Due to the low scale of production activities that occurred on the Site contamination from previous site use was expected to be of relatively low risk.

The results of the laboratory analysis reported no evidence of contamination of the subsurface of the Site by asbestos, petroleum hydrocarbons, PAH, pesticides, PCBs or Heavy Metals Site. The onsite dam was assessed as suitable for dewatering via application to land (i.e. irrigation), and sediments contained within the dam are considered suitable for beneficial on-site reuse. A salinity assessment indicated that the soils on-site have negligible salinity effects, while the results of an aggressivity assessment indicated that the soils located on-site are expected to be non-aggressive towards steel, with possible localised mild aggressivity towards.

As the intended development on Site includes rezoning the Site to several residential properties, no irrigation or effluent disposal is likely to take place on Site. DLA is therefore of the opinion that a Salinity Management Plan is not required.

The dwelling and adjacent shed to the east of number 315 was identified as potentially constructed with asbestos containing materials. Building materials that are suspected to contain asbestos will require removal by a WorkCover approved licensed contractor with an asbestos clearance required after removal.

Project ID: DL3879 iv 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

It is therefore the opinion of DLA that the Site assessment objectives of this report have been achieved. The PSI concludes that the Site is considered suitable for the intended land use consistent with NEPM (NEPC, 2013) Residential A – Residential with Garden / Accessible soil. The structures identified as potentially containing asbestos will require removal by a WorkCover approved contractor, disposal of material at a licenced facility and an asbestos clearance at the completion of removal.

Project ID: DL3879 v 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1

1.1 General ...... 1

1.2 Objectives...... 1

1.3 Scope of Works ...... 1

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ...... 2

2.1 Site Identification ...... 2

2.2 Proposed Development ...... 2

2.3 Boundaries and Surrounding Land Use ...... 3

2.4 Site Geology and Soils ...... 3

2.5 Site Topography ...... 3

2.6 Acid Sulfate Soils ...... 3

2.7 Salinity and Aggressivity of Soils ...... 4

2.8 Hydrology and Hydrogeology ...... 4

2.9 Site Meteorology...... 5

3.0 DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS ...... 6

3.1 Section 149 Certificate ...... 6

3.2 WorkCover Dangerous Goods Search ...... 6

3.3 Contaminated Land Record Search ...... 6

4.0 SITE HISTORY ...... 8

4.1 Aerial Photograph Review...... 8

4.2 Historical Title Search ...... 8

4.3 Heritage / Archaeological Items ...... 10

4.4 Site History Summary ...... 10

5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN ...... 11

5.1 Field Investigation Procedure ...... 11

5.1.1 Soil Collection ...... 11

5.2 Analytical Strategy ...... 12

5.2.1 Inorganic ...... 12

5.2.2 Organic ...... 12

Project ID: DL3879 vi 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

5.3 Data Quality Objectives ...... 12

5.4 Assessment Criteria ...... 15

5.4.1 Soil Criteria ...... 15

5.5 Salinity Assessment ...... 17

6.0 FIELD OBSERVATIONS ...... 20

6.1 Site Inspection ...... 20

6.2 Dangerous Goods ...... 20

6.3 Flora and Fauna ...... 21

6.4 Fill Material ...... 21

6.5 Offsite Observations ...... 21

7.0 Results ...... 22

7.1 Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Volatile Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons and Semi Volatile Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons ...... 22

7.2 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons ...... 22

7.3 Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls ...... 22

7.4 Heavy Metals ...... 22

7.5 Soil Salinity ...... 23

7.6 Soil Sodicity ...... 23

7.7 Soil Aggressivity and pH ...... 24

7.8 Asbestos ...... 24

7.9 Water and Sediment Sampling Results ...... 25

7.10 QA/QC Comments ...... 26

8.0 DISCUSSION ...... 27

9.0 CONCLUSIONS ...... 29

10.0 REFERENCES ...... 30

Project ID: DL3879 vii 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Site Survey Figure 3 Development Layout Plan Figure 4 Site Layout and Sample Location

APPENDICES

Appendix A Data Summary Table Appendix B NATA Certified Analytical Results Appendix C Quality Assurance and Quality Control Appendix D Groundwater Works Database Search Appendix E Liverpool City Council Section 149 Certificate Appendix F Dangerous Goods Search Appendix G EPA Contaminated Lands Search Appendix H Historical Aerial Photographs

Appendix I Historical Title Search

Project ID: DL3879 viii 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 General

DLA Environmental Services (DLA) was engaged by Group Development Services Pty Ltd to conduct a Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) of the following area:

315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court, NSW 2565 (the Site).

The PSI was commissioned to serve as supporting documentation for the issue of a residential redevelopment Development Approval (DA) consent. The DA conditions require an environmental site assessment to be submitted to Liverpool City Council characterising potential contamination at the Site, drawing conclusions on the suitability of the Site for its proposed land use, and providing recommendations for further investigation or remediation, if required.

1.2 Objectives

The project objectives of this PSI are to satisfy the general requirements of State Environmental Planning Policy No.55 (SEPP 55) in accordance with Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites (NSW EPA, 2011). Specifically, this PSI will consider the potential for suspected historical activities to have caused contamination at the Site and assess the suitability of the land for future land use consistent with Residential A in the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Amendment Measure 2013 (No.1) (‘NEPM’, NEPC, 2013).

1.3 Scope of Works

To achieve these objectives, DLA carried out the following works:  Search and review of records and Site plans available locally and from State Regulatory Authorities, including WorkCover, Department of Lands and NSW EPA;  Review of historical aerial photographs available from the Land Information Centre;  Review of environmental Site conditions including the geology and hydrogeology;  Provide a comprehensive overview of the Site’s past and current land uses and potential contamination issues;  Limited and targeted soil sampling;  Provide a preliminary assessment of Site contamination (if any) and discuss the Site condition and suitability in consideration of the proposed development scenario;  Consideration of potential Site contamination management requirements, if any; and, Preparation of this PSI report in accordance with relevant EPA made or endorsed guidelines.

Project ID: DL3886 1 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.1 Site Identification

The Site identification details are summarised in Table 2a below:

Table 2a – Site Identification Summary

ITEMS DETAILS

Address 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court, NSW 2565

Local Government Authority Liverpool City Council

Lot and Deposited Plan Lot 131 and 312 DP1137588

Development Controls Liverpool City Council Development Control Plan

Site Zonings E4 – Environmental Living

Current Use Rural Residential

Proposed Use Residential with gardens / accessible soil

Site Area (approx.) 39,240 m2 (3.9 ha)

Locality Map Refer to Figure 1 – Site Location

Site Survey Refer to Figure 2 – Site Survey

2.2 Proposed Development

Based on the information provided, it is understood that the Site will be redeveloped to provide 12 residential lots ranging from 2003m2 to 5481m2 with the average size of 2653m2. The proposed development will include a public road on the eastern boundary and a cul-de-sac through the middle of the Site spanning 16 meters in width.

Refer to Figure 3 – Development Layout Plan.

This development scenario is consistent with the definition of ‘Residential with gardens and accessible soil’ provided in Schedule B7 of the NEPM (NEPC, 2013) for residential developed areas.

Project ID: DL3886 2 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

2.3 Boundaries and Surrounding Land Use

The boundary and surrounding landscape features of the Site are summarised in Table 2b below:

Table 2b – Boundaries and Surrounding Land Use

DIRECTION DETAILS

North The Sydney Water Supply Canal and Rural Residential properties. South Undisturbed bushland and open grasslands possibly used for grazing. The onsite dam links the Site with the neighbouring property east. Further east are similar East rural residential properties. West Residential redevelopment, with a road network and some vacant lots.

2.4 Site Geology and Soils

Review of the Geological Survey 1:100,000 map of Penrith Series 9030 indicates the underlying bedrock consists of Bringelly shale of the Wianamatta Group consisting of shale, carbonaceous claystone, claystone, laminate, fine to medium grained lithic sandstone, rare coal and tuff.

Review of the 1:100,000 Soil Landscape of Penrith map prepared by the Soil Conservation Services of NSW indicates the underlying soil consists of Residual soil of the Blacktown Landscape Group which is characterised by shallow to moderately deep hard setting clays with moderately reactive highly plastic subsoils with poor drainage.

2.5 Site Topography

The elevation of the Site ranges from approximately 91m Australian Height Datum (AHD) in the north east corner to 96m AHD in the south west corner with an overall gradient down towards the north east. Site drainage is also towards the north east with three separate large dams present on the property collecting surface runoff.

2.6 Acid Sulfate Soils

Review of the Acid Sulfate Soil Risk Map, Liverpool Environmental Plan 2008 indicated that there are no known occurrences of acid sulfate soils in the area. No visual indications of acid sulfate soils were observed during the investigation works.

Project ID: DL3886 3 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

2.7 Salinity and Aggressivity of Soils

The Salinity Potential in Western Sydney map (DIPNR, 2002) indicates the Site area generally is within a region of moderate salinity potential with high and known salinity potential also indicated.

2.8 Hydrology and Hydrogeology

Topography, surface cover and geology control the hydrogeology of the Site. Due to the relatively low permeability of the underlying subsurface, rainfall run-off infiltrating through the soil and bedrock profiles is expected to be minimal. It is anticipated that the majority of rainfall runoff will flow into the onsite dam and continue to the neighbouring dams to the north east.

Given the hydrology of the Site and surrounding area, groundwater underlying the Site is expected to flow in a north-east direction towards Bonds Creek.

Our search of the NSW Department Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources groundwater database for the region indicates there that are 11 registered groundwater bores within a 1.5km radius of the Site. Based on the NSW Office of Water Works Summary Reports, DLA expects the permanent groundwater table to be located at depth within the underlying bedrock (approximately 170 m below ground level (bgl); however, the Summary Reports also indicate that there is perched groundwater located at depths between 6.0m and 9.9m bgl, likely to be associated with the soil / shale interface. Table 2c – Regional Groundwater Summary Data

DISTANCE FROM STANDING SALINITY WELL ID PURPOSE DEPTH (m) SITE (m) WATER LEVEL (m) (µS/cm)

GW111854 400 E Monitoring No data No data No data

GW112661 400 E Monitoring No data No data No data

GW113114 500 SE Monitoring 9.93 No data No data

GW112433 1100 S Monitoring 8.90 No data No data

GW113117 600 SW Monitoring No data No data No data

GW113118 1100 SW Monitoring No data No data No data

GW113116 1400 NW Monitoring No data No data No data

GW112435 1500 NW Monitoring 9.0 8.5 No data

GW111852 1400 N Monitoring 6.0 1.5 No data

GW058735 1400 N Irrigation 173.7 91.4 No data

GW058734 1500 N Irrigation 191.4 91.4 No data

Project ID: DL3886 4 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

Groundwater is not considered to be at risk of contamination as a result of Site activities and, therefore, has not been investigated further in this assessment. Refer to Appendix D for Groundwater Works Summary Reports.

2.9 Site Meteorology

The Bureau of Meteorology NSW gives the average annual rainfall for the Liverpool area at 800.1mm, with an annual daytime temperature range of 16.5° to 28.5°C, and an annual average temperature of 24.1°C.

Project ID: DL3886 5 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

3.0 DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS

3.1 Section 149 Certificate

A Planning Certificate from City of Liverpool Council under Section 149 (2) and (5) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) was obtained for both Lot 1 and Lot 2 in DP518718, stating:

 The land is currently zoned as E4 – Environmental Living under SEPP (Sydney Regional Growth Centres) 2006;  The land is not land to which a property vegetation plan relates, as all land in the Liverpool Local Government Area is excluded from the Native Vegetation Act 2003;  The Site does not contain Aboriginal archaeological sites under the protection of the National Parks and Wildlife Service Act 1974 (NSW);  The Site is not affected by Local Road Widening or alignment under an environmental planning instrument;  No matters apply to this property under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 (NSW);  The land is not affected by the operation Sections 38 or 39 of the Coastal Protection Act 1979 (NSW).  The land has not been proclaimed to be within a mine subsidence district; and,  The land is affected by the Planning for Bushfire Protection 2006.

Refer to Appendix E – Liverpool City Council Section 149 Certificate.

3.2 WorkCover Dangerous Goods Search

A search of the WorkCover NSW Stored Chemical Information Database (SCID) indicated that Dangerous Goods Licenses have not been held for the Site.

Refer to Appendix F – Dangerous Goods Search.

3.3 Contaminated Land Record Search

A search was conducted of records pertaining to Section 58 of the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 (NSW).

The search indicated that the Site and surrounding properties are not encumbered by any notices from the NSW EPA with regard to contaminated land.

Project ID: DL3886 6 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

A search of the NSW EPA online Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) public register did not locate any records of licences, applications, notices, audits, or pollution studies/reduction programs for the Site.

Refer to Appendix G – EPA Contaminated Land Register Record.

Project ID: DL3886 7 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

4.0 SITE HISTORY

4.1 Aerial Photograph Review

Aerial photographs from 1947 to 2015, available from the NSW Lands Department and nearmaps.com, were reviewed by DLA with relevant observations summarised in Table 4a below:

Table 4a – Aerial Photograph Review

YEAR DETAILS

1947 The Site area is covered in grass and shrubby woodlands. There are no visible structures, tracks, fences or dams on the Site or within neighbouring properties. The Sydney Water Supply Canal is visible to the north of the Site, and Denham Court Road is visible to south and west. 1956 No visible significant changes occurring on-site. A single property is visible to the north of the canal. 1975 No visible significant changes occurring on-site. Residential premises to the north of the canal have been established. 1986 The house on number 315 is visible as well as the current dam. There is a visible horizontal line of disturbance through the Site to facilitate the installation of the gas main on the Site. 1994 No visible significant changes occurring on-site.

2004 No visible significant changes occurring on-site. 2009 No visible significant changes occurring on-site. 2016 A dwelling is visible at number 335. No other visible significant changes occurring to Site.

Refer to Appendix H – Historical Aerial Photographs

4.2 Historical Title Search

Title Search results from 1982 to date were reviewed by DLA with relevant observations summarised below in Tables 4b-4d:

Table 4b – Historical Title Search – Applies to both Lots

YEAR SITE OWNER LAND USE / OCCUPATION

1892 – 1911 Giovanni Ballista Modini Gunmaker Guilio Emilio Baldasare Gentleman 1911 – 1914 Peter Ciancia Builder

Project ID: DL3886 8 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

Charles Weston Perry Grazier 1914 – 1924 William Robert Dickinson Grazier 1924 – 1925 William Robert Dickinson Grazier 1925 – 1957 Minnie Eliza Albert No information 1957 – 1960 Michael Francois Albert Company Director 1960 – 1977 J. Albert & Son Pty Limited No information Cedric James Breasley & his 1977 – 2004 Farmer deceased estate 2004 – 2005 Kay Francis Breasley No information

Leases: -  13.5.1959 H223420 – Alfred Cyril Cooper (Dairy Farmer) – Expired 16.11.1962  18.10.19612 J190050 – Alfred Cyril Cooper (Dairy Farmer) – Expired 20.9.1967  5.6.1967 K739474 – Alfred Cyril Cooper (Dairy Farmer) – Expired 15.12.1972

Table 4c – Historical Title Search – Applies to Lot 131 DP 1137588

YEAR SITE OWNER LAND USE / OCCUPATION

2005- to date Brian Charles Hobson No information Michele Kerry Hobson

Easements: -  24.6.1976 P720206 – Easement for Pipeline 24.835 Metres (s) wide  7.11.1996 2375527 – Easement for Pipeline 6 Metres (s) wide  21.5.2009 DP1137588 – Easement to Drain Water 10 Metres (s) & Variable width

Table 4d – Historical Title Search – Applies to Lot 2 DP 518718

YEAR SITE OWNER LAND USE / OCCUPATION

2005 – 2009 Brian Charles Hobson No information Michele Kerry Hobson 2009-to date John Kevin Hawthorn No information Amanda Hawthorn

Easements: -  24.6.1976 P720206 – Easement for Pipeline 24.835 Metres (s) wide  7.11.1996 2375527 – Easement for Pipeline 6 Metres (s) wide  21.5.2009 DP1137588 – Easement to Drain Water 10 Metres (s) & Variable width

Refer to Appendix I – Historical Title Search.

Project ID: DL3886 9 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

4.3 Heritage / Archaeological Items

A search of the Australian Heritage Trust database, NSW Heritage Inventory and Archaeological maps provided Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No 45) did not reveal any heritage listed items at the Site.

4.4 Site History Summary

The earliest Site history records (1892) indicate the land has been privately owned, with graziers or dairy farmers owning and/or leasing the land from 1914. From 1986 number 315 has been occupied by a residence, with number 335 having a residence constructed in 2016.

The Site also has a significant easement for the gas main through the Site. The high pressure gas main on the Site would place significant restrictions on the ability of excavation or heavy machinery to be used onsite and make uncontrolled fill highly unlikely on the Site. There was also no historical evidence of any filling or subsurface storage on the Site.

Historical hazardous building materials such as lead based paint, galvanised zinc and asbestos containing materials (ACM) are likely to have been used within the construction of buildings on the Site within the last 50 years, including the shed and residential development on number 315. Therefore, heavy metals and asbestos are considered potentially to be present within near surface soils on-site. There is also a risk of hydrocarbons to be present in the surface soils due to the possible use of farm machinery during grazing practices.

Project ID: DL3886 10 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN

5.1 Field Investigation Procedure

The likelihood of contamination was assessed by comparison of assessment results against NSW EPA produced or endorsed criteria available at the time this report was published. Sampling was performed on a judgemental basis and targeted areas identified as potential high risk for contamination. The justification of the sampling point regime for the assessment was based on the investigator’s knowledge, operational requirements, experience and history of the Site. All historical investigations and anecdotal evidence supported the sampling approach adopted and provided for samples to be collected in an unbiased manner. Field investigation comprised the following:

 Inspection of the Site; and,  Collection of six targeted soil samples.

Refer to Figure 4 –Sampling Locations.

5.1.1 Soil Collection

Soil samples for chemical analyses were generally collected in accordance with the Sampling Design Guidelines (NSW EPA, 1995), NEPM (NEPC, 2013) and AS4482.1-2005. Collected soil samples were immediately transferred to sample containers of appropriate composition (glass jars for chemical analysis, plastic bags for asbestos). Job number; sample identification number; sampler’s initials and date of sampling were recorded on sample labels affixed to the sample containers.

Chemical samples were then placed immediately into a chilled esky to minimise the risk of loss of potential volatile components. The samples were transported under standard DLA chain-of-custody protocols to the NATA accredited laboratories – Envirolab Services Pty Ltd and Australian Safer Environment & Technology Pty Ltd. All chemical samples were stored and transported at temperatures below 4°C.

All samples were collected by DLA staff who are specifically trained in hazardous waste field investigation techniques and health and safety procedures. All techniques used are specified in DLA Field Manual for Contaminated Sites, which are based on methods specified by the United States Environment Protection Agency (US EPA) and NEPM (NEPC, 2013).

Project ID: DL3886 11 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

5.2 Analytical Strategy

Samples were analysed for listed chemicals based on potential contamination in the area and to allow for a preliminary assessment of all representative areas of the Site. Samples were analysed for the following parameters:

5.2.1 Inorganic

 Heavy metals: arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn);  Salinity, Chloride, Sulphate, CEC, EC, pH; and,  Asbestos.

5.2.2 Organic

 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRH);  Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (BTEX);  Volatile TRH (vTRH);  Organochlorine Pesticides (OCs);  Organophosphorus Pesticides (OPs);  Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs); and,  Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs).

No Photo Ionisation Detection (PID) assessments were undertaken as TRH analyses were performed on all samples.

5.3 Data Quality Objectives

The NEPM (NEPC, 2013) and Australian Standard (AS) 4482.1-2005 recommend that data quality objectives (DQOs) be implemented during the investigation of potentially contaminated sites. The DQO process described in AS 4482.1-2005 Guide to the Investigation and Sampling of Sites with Potentially Contaminated Soil Part 1: Non-Volatile and Semi-Volatile Compounds outlines seven distinct steps to outline the project goals, decisions, constraints and an assessment of the project uncertainties and how to address these when they arise. The DQOs have been summarised in the Table 5a.

Project ID: DL3886 12 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

Table 5a – Summary of DQOs

Have previous land uses affected the suitability of the Site for Residential A as defined by

1 NEPM (NEPC, 2013)?

Problem

State the

 Does historical information indicate a potential for contamination to be present at the Site?

 Do contaminant concentrations in the soil comply with the stated screening levels?

2  Do soils on the Site currently require any remedial action / risk management?

 Have the previous land uses affected the environmental quality of the land?

Identify theIdentify Decisions  Are there any identifiable risks to human health or the environment on Site?

 Undertake appropriate searches of the site to determine any recorded history of

detrimental effects on the site.

 Judgemental soil sampling across the Site.

3  Determination of the general concentrations of chemicals across the Site.

to Decisions

Identify InputsIdentify  Identifying current and future potential receptors and the likelihood of exposure to unacceptable levels of contamination both on and off the Site.

4 The physical study will focus on fill materials and natural soils within the Site boundaries.

efine Study

Boundaries

D

The Site will be considered suitable for its intended land use if soil concentrations comply with the screening levels provided in NEPM (NEPC, 2013), as determined by the following Site

Assessment Criteria (SAC) being applied to the data:

 The 95% Upper Confidence Limit (UCL) of the arithmetic mean for each Contaminant

5 of Concern must comply with the respective screening level;

Develop

Decision Rule  The individual contaminant concentration should not exceed the screening level by more than 250%, and;

 The standard deviation of individual contaminants should not exceed 50% of the HIL.

Field and laboratory quality controls are implemented to avoid error and to ensure the action

levels exceed the measurement detection limits. The performance of decision making inputs

6 will be enhanced through the application of Data Quality Indicators (DQI), defined in Table 5b

Decision Errors

Specify LimitsSpecify on below.

 Ensure access to all relevant and previous environmental data.

7  Identify the most resource-effective sampling and analysis design for general data that are expected to satisfy the DQOs.

Obtaining Data

Optimise Design for

Project ID: DL3886 13 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

Table 5b – Summary of DQIs

DATA PRECISION AND ACCURACY >10 x LOR: 30% inorganics; 50% organics (field) Acceptable Relative <10 x LOR: Assessed on individual basis (field) Percentage Difference (RPD) >5 x LOR: 50% (laboratory) <5 x LOR: No Limit (laboratory)

Based on acceptance criteria of laboratory as specified on certificate of analysis, includes: blank samples, matrix spikes, control samples, and

Adequate Laboratory surrogate spike samples.

Performance Use of analytical laboratories with adequately trained and experienced testing staff experienced in the analyses undertaken, with appropriate NATA certification.

DATA REPRESENTATIVENESS Sample and Analysis Selection Representativeness of all contaminants of concern. Trip Blanks No detection above LOR.

Trip Spikes Recoverable concentrations of volatiles between 60 – 140%.

Adequate laboratory internal quality control and quality assurance Laboratory Selection methods, complying with the NEPM (NEPC, 2013). DOCUMENTATION COMPLETENESS Laboratory sample receipt information received confirming receipt of samples intact and appropriate chain of custody. Chain of Custody Records NATA registered laboratory results certificates provided.

DATA COMPLETENESS Analysis for all contaminants of concern.

Field duplicate sample numbers complying with NEPM (NEPC, 2013) Trip spike samples prepared and sent with field samples regularly.

COMPARABILITY Use of NATA registered laboratories.

Detailed logs of all sample locations recorded.

Test methods comparable between primary and secondary laboratory

Acceptable RPD’s between original samples and field duplicates and inter- laboratory triplicate samples.

Project ID: DL3886 14 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

5.4 Assessment Criteria

The assessment criteria have been chosen in accordance with current Australian and NSW EPA guidelines. The criteria provided are the most current and widely accepted for Tier 1 assessment of land use suitability at present in Australia, and have generally been developed using a risk-based approach.

5.4.1 Soil Criteria

Criteria from the NEPM (NEPC, 2013) Schedule B1 were utilised for this assessment. Soil Health Screening Levels (HSLs) for vapour intrusion were used for volatile petroleum contaminants, whilst the US EPA Regional Screening levels were cited to extrapolate criteria for volatile halogenated compounds.

With regard to the vapour intrusion criteria, the NEPM (NEPC, 2013) provides Health Screening Levels (HSLs), Ecological Screening Levels (ESLs) and Management Limits (MLs) for TRH fractions in soil based on concerns regarding ecological impacts, inhalation of vapours and direct contact with contaminant sources. The material type of ‘sand’ has been used as it offers to most similar correlation to the condition of soils at the Site.

Table 5c –TRH Soil Criteria for Vapour Intrusion (mg/kg)

HSL-A1 (Sand) ANALYTES 0-1.0m

Benzene 0.5 Toluene 160 Ethylbenzene 55 Xylene 40 Naphthalene 3

F1: C6-C10 45

F2: C10-C16 110

F3: C16-C34 NA

F4: C34-C40 NA

NA = Not Applicable (i.e. NEPM (NEPC, 2013) does not provide HSLs for the F3 and F4 hydrocarbon fractions). 1 – NEPM (NEPC, 2013) Table 1A(3) – Soil HSLs for vapour intrusion – 0-1.0m, Column B.

Project ID: DL3886 15 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

Table 5d – Health Screening Levels for Direct Contact (mg/kg)

ANALYTES HSL-A1

Benzene 100 Toluene 14,000 Ethylbenzene 4,500 Xylenes 12,000 Naphthalene 1,400

F1: C6-C10 4,400

F2: C10-C16 3,300

F3: C16-C34 4,500

F4: C34-C40 6,300

1 – Friebel and Nadebaum 2011, Health Screening Levels for petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil and Groundwater, Part 1: Technical Development Document, Table A4 – Soil Health Screening Levels for Direct Contact, Column B.

Table 5e – Criteria for Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons ESL and ML (mg/kg)

ANALYTES ESL (Coarse)1 ML- (Coarse)2

Benzene 50 -- Toluene 85 --

Ethylbenzene 70 -- Xylenes 105 -- Benzo(a)Pyrene 0.7 --

OPEN SPACE F1: C6-C10 180 700

F2: C10-C16 120 1,000

F3: C16-C34 300 2,500

URBAN RESIDENITAL AND PUBLIC F4: C34-C40 2,800 10,000

1 – NEPM (NEPC, 2013) Table 1B(6) – ESLs for TPH fractions, BTEX and benzo(a)pyrene in soil. 2 – NEPM (NEPC, 2013) Table 1B(7) – Management Limits for TPH fractions F1-F4 in soil.

Project ID: DL3886 16 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

Table 5f – Site Assessment Criteria for Soils (mg/kg)

ANALYTES HIL-A1 Arsenic 100 Cadmium 20

Chromium 100 Copper 6,000 Lead 300 Mercury 40

HEAVY METALSHEAVY Nickel 400 Zinc 7,400

BaP TEQ 3

PAH Total PAHs 300

PCB 1

PCB

Aldrin/Dieldrin 6 Chlordane 50 DDT+DDE+DDD 240

PESTICIDES Heptachlor 6

Bonded ACM 0.01% Friable Asbestos/Asbestos Fines 0.001%

ASBESTOS Surface Asbestos (0.1m) No Visible

1 – Criteria adopted for proposed residential areas – NEPM (NEPC, 2013) Table 1A(1) and Table 7, Column A.

5.5 Salinity Assessment

The guidelines for the Salinity assessment are outlined in Department of Land and Water Conservation – ‘Site Investigation for Urban Salinity 2002’ and Department of Conservation and Land Management ‘A Guide for the Interpretation of Soil Test Results 1992’. The number of samples and analysis are based upon the guidelines in the Site Investigations for Urban Salinity (DLWC, 2002) and Western Sydney Salinity Code of Practice (WSROC, 2003).

The Salinity Potential in Western Sydney map (DIPNR, 2002) indicated the Site area is within a region of moderate salinity potential with high and known salinity potential also indicated. Initial Site Investigations for Open Space (1:25 000 scale) recommends six to eighteen samples per 1km2, determined by the variation of soil characteristics on site, the proposed future land use and the potential for development to disturb and mobilise any salt present in soils.

Project ID: DL3886 17 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

The Site is approximately 0.039km2 with little variation in the soil characteristics. Effluent disposal is currently will take place on Site. DLA considers four samples appropriate in accordance with the Site area, soil type and proposed land use.

The criteria for assessing soil salinity is based on Electrical Conductivity and is shown in Table 5g below:

Table 5g – Electrical Conductivity Criteria for Soils

CLASS ECe (ds/m) COMMENTS

Non-Saline <2 Salinity effects mostly negligible Slightly Saline 2-4 Yields of very sensitive crops may be affected Moderately Saline 4-8 Yields of many crops may be affected Very Saline 8-16 Only tolerant crops yield satisfactorily Highly Saline >16 Only a few very tolerant crops yield satisfactorily

Sodic soils are dispersible and are vulnerable to erosion and tunnelling. Sodicity is measured by Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) and Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC). As soil salinity is a function of soil stability and structure, parameters such as CEC, ESP and Sulphate must be considered to provide a holistic understanding of potential degradation.

In addition to the above, the presence of sulphate and moderately acidic soils has the potential to cause high soil aggressivity to concrete and steel structures, particularly if the structures are in direct contact with the soil. The following sulphate measure of soil aggressivity is based on the criteria outlined in the Australian Standard, AS 2159-2009 “Piling – Design and Installation” 2009 and are summarized in Table 5h, 5i and 5j.

Table 5h – Measure of Soil Sodicity and Cation Exchange Capacity

CLASS RATING

<5 Non-sodic 5-15 Sodic >15 Highly-sodic CEC (cmol+/kg) RATING <6 Very Low

6-12 Low

13-25 Moderate 26-40 High

Project ID: DL3886 18 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

>40 Very High

Table 5i – Measure of Aggressivity to Concrete

Sulfate expressed as SO3* Low Permeability Soils/ All Soils above pH (mg/kg) Groundwater

<5000 >5.5 Non-Aggressive 5000-10000 4.5-5.5 Mild 10,000-20000 4-4.5 Moderate >20000 <4 Severe

*Approximate 100mg/kg of SO4 = 80mg/kg of SO3

Table 5j – Measure of Aggressivity to Steel

Low Permeability Soils/ All Soils above Chlorides in Soil (mg/kg) pH Groundwater

<5000 >5 Non-Aggressive 5000-20000 4-5 Non-Aggressive 20000-50000 3-4 Mild >50000 <3 Moderate

Project ID: DL3886 19 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

6.0 FIELD OBSERVATIONS

6.1 Site Inspection

Site inspections were conducted on the 1st of July 2016.

Number 335 comprises of a large open space of maintained lawn with some large trees to the east. The dwelling on the Site is a recent addition and appears to be used as a display home. The property has a bitumen driveway, with a small stockpile of surplus bitumen and some cut soils located east of the dwelling.

The property on 315 has a driveway of recycled aggregate running through it with a storage area for steel, machinery and demountable buildings along the north west boundary. A large metal shed on a concrete slab is located in the middle of the property, with a small dwelling on the Site having an easterly aspect. The dwelling has potentially been renovated with suspected modern fibre cement cladding used rather than asbestos containing materials. It is unclear whether asbestos containing materials are underlying the cladding or if asbestos containing materials are still present within the house.

There is a small storage shed to the east of the dwelling which was observed to have asbestos containing materials in the eaves of the shed. A larger tin shed on a concrete slab is located to the west of the dwelling. Assess to the shed is via crushed aggregate with a path leading to a storage area on the northern boundary of the Site. Materials stored include tyres, demountable buildings, car bodies, trailers and truck bodies.

Along the north eastern boundary is a large dam spanning across the Site and into the neighbouring property. Water in the dam comes from surface runoff from the Site, road and neighbouring properties.

A large gas main dissects the properties in a south west to north east direction and is adjacent to the Sydney water supply canal.

The soil profile across the Site was observed comprise brown moist clay loam topsoil (200mm thick) overlying orange red medium plasticity residual clays.

6.2 Dangerous Goods

There were no dangerous goods or dangerous goods storage facilities observed on the Site.

Project ID: DL3886 20 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

6.3 Flora and Fauna

The majority of the Site is covered by established grasslands and some large trees. There are no crops or plants currently grown on-site.

No significant or endangered animal species were observed on the Site. All trees and grass lands appeared to be healthy and free of environmental stress.

6.4 Fill Material

Minor cut and fill activities are expected to have occurred over the Site to permit the level installation of the dwellings and access paths. The observed stockpile of surplus clay to the west of the driveway in number 315 was visually similar to the residual clays underlying the Site, indicating excavation of the Site is likely to have occurred.

A small stockpile of bitumen was also observed on number 335 and is expected to be surplus from the previously installed driveway. There was no identified fill material buried on the Site.

6.5 Offsite Observations

The neighbouring properties to the north and east are similar rural residential properties. Residential redevelopment is currently occurring to the east of the Site, with a large area of open space to the south. The Sydney Water supply canal is located adjacent to the north west boundary of the Site.

Project ID: DL3886 21 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

7.0 RESULTS

The sampling regime involved the collection of six representative primary surface samples. Two sediment samples were collected from the onsite dam for assessment for beneficial reuse on site as well as two water samples from the onsite dam for dewatering applications. The results of the assessments conducted at the Site are summarised below.

Refer to Appendix A – Data Summary Table and Appendix B – NATA Certified Analytical Results.

7.1 Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Volatile Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons and Semi Volatile Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons

All primary soil and sediment samples were analysed for Volatile Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (vTRH) and Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl benzene, Xylene and Naphthalene (BTEX). There were no concentrations of vTRH, BTEX or Naphthalene recorded above the laboratory Limit of Reporting (LOR).

All samples were also analysed for semi-volatile Total Recoverable Hydrocarbon (TRH) compounds. There were no concentrations of TRH reported above the laboratory LOR with the exception of TRH F3 in sample S3 with a concentration of 110mg/kg which is below the site acceptance criteria.

7.2 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

All primary soil and sediment samples were analysed for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) compounds. There were no reported detections of Benzo(a)Pyrene TEQ, however Total PAH was detected above the laboratory LOR in sample S4 (0.15mg/kg). All concentrations were below the adopted assessment criteria of 300mg/kg.

7.3 Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls

Three primary samples and the two dam sediment samples were analysed for Organochlorine (OC), Organophosphate (OP) pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). There were no concentrations of OC or OP pesticides or PCBs reported above the Laboratory LOR.

7.4 Heavy Metals

All soil samples from the Site were analysed for all eight heavy metals. Detections were reported for all heavy metals with the exception of mercury. All concentrations were below the HILs.

Project ID: DL3886 22 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

Refer to the summary of Heavy Metals in Soil in Table 7a.

Table 7a – Heavy Metals in Soil (mg/kg)

SAMPLE As Cd Cr Cu Pb Hg Ni Zn

S1 6 <0.4 14 17 12 <0.1 4 20 S2 6 <0.4 17 19 19 <0.1 9 39 S3 5 <0.4 23 11 18 <0.1 8 18 S4 6 <0.4 24 35 22 <0.1 20 59 S5 7 <0.4 24 14 21 <0.1 12 30 S6 6 0.5 19 37 56 <0.1 10 94 DS1 5 <0.4 10 20 10 <0.1 6 38 DS2 7 <0.4 23 14 16 <0.1 8 20

7.5 Soil Salinity

The Electrical Conductivity for all soil samples was found to be in the non-saline range, with salinity effects mostly negligible.

Table 7b – Electrical Conductivity Detection Results

EC ECe SAMPLE TEXTURE CLASS COMMENT (µS/cm) (dS/m)

S1 Light Clay Non-saline 670 <2 Salinity effects mostly negligible

S2 Light Clay Non-saline 350 <2 Salinity effects mostly negligible

S3 Light Clay Non-saline 160 <2 Salinity effects mostly negligible

S4 Light Clay Non-saline 140 <2 Salinity effects mostly negligible

S5 Light Clay Non-saline 130 <2 Salinity effects mostly negligible

S6 Light Clay Non-saline 31 <2 Salinity effects mostly negligible

7.6 Soil Sodicity

The Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) of the soil samples ranged between non-sodic and sodic. The Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) of the samples were in the low range, with a single sample (SAL- 3) found to be in the moderate CEC range, as summarised in Table 7c.

Project ID: DL3886 23 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

Table 7c – Results for Soil Sodicity and Cation Exchange Capacity

SAMPLE ESP (%) CEC (cmol+/kg) COMMENT

S1 19 13 Sodic and moderate CEC S2 5.92 13 Sodic and moderate CEC S3 3.26 8.3 Non-sodic and low CEC S4 7.69 16 Sodic and moderate CEC S5 4.58 10 Non-sodic and low CEC S6 1.46 12 Non-sodic and low CEC

7.7 Soil Aggressivity and pH

Table 7d demonstrates that all samples were non-aggressive towards steel, however two samples reporting mild aggressivity to concrete based on the pH results with very low sulphate and chloride concentrations. On average, the pH was mildly acidic.

Table 7d – Results for Soil Aggressivity

Chloride SAMPLE Sulphate (mg/kg) pH Comment (mg/kg) Mild Aggressivity to Concrete, S1 840 660 5.3 non-aggressive to steel

S2 140 300 5.8 Non-Aggressive Mild Aggressivity to Concrete, S3 120 100 5.4 non-aggressive to steel

S4 65 55 7.3 Non-Aggressive

S5 87 110 5.6 Non-Aggressive

S6 9 <10 6.0 Non-Aggressive

7.8 Asbestos

The dwelling and adjacent shed to the east of number 315 was identified as potentially constructed with asbestos containing materials. All buildings were in good condition and only pose a risk of asbestos exposure if they require demolition.

Analysis of asbestos in soils was undertaken for four samples. Asbestos fines/fibrous asbestos (AF/FA) was not detected in any of the samples collected from the Site.

Project ID: DL3886 24 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

7.9 Water and Sediment Sampling Results

The dam water and sediment were sampled by DLA on the 4th August 2016. The water samples were collected from a water depth estimated to be approximately 0.5m, while sediment samples were collected from the banks of the dam.

Results are summarised in Table 7e below:

Table 7e – Water Quality Results (µg/L)

IRRIGATION DISCHARGE PARAMETERS DAM 1 DAM 2 CRITERIA CRITERIA pH 7.1 6.8 6.5 – 8.5 6.5 – 8.5 Nitrogen – Total(mg/l) 2.0 1.8 0.8-12 0.35C Phosphorous – Total 0.1 0.2 25-125 0.25c (mg/l)

Ammonia (mg/L) 0.36 0.31 -- 0.9 BOD 12 7 -- <15b Arsenic <1 <1 -- 13 Cadmium <0.1 <0.1 -- 0.2 Chromium <1 <1 -- 1 Copper 2 2 -- 1.4 Lead <1 <1 -- 3.4 Mercury <0.05 <0.05 -- 0.6 Nickel 1 1 -- 11 Zinc 5 5 -- 8 Themotollerant 3 34 230 230 Coliforms (CFU/100mL)

a: based on concentrations that may result in blockages or operational issues in irrigation sprays. b: Protection of aquaculture species (ANZECC, 2000). c: NSW lowland river trigger values for slightly disturbed ecosystems (ANZECC, 2000). Bold denotes exceedance of reuse or discharge criteria.

The two water samples collected from the dam reported Total Nitrogen and copper exceeding the nominated offsite discharge criteria. All criteria met the required onsite reuse/irrigation requirements.

The two sediment samples collected from the dam reported contaminant concentrations less than the adopted soil guidelines, therefore indicating that the sediments within the dam would be suitable for onsite reuse.

Project ID: DL3886 25 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

7.10 QA/QC Comments

Field quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) included calculation of the relative percent difference (%RPD).

An intra-laboratory duplicate rate of 16.7% was achieved, greater than the 10% required by the Field Quality Plan. The calculated %RPD results were reported to comply with the criteria set for acceptable RPDs.

Refer to Appendix C – Quality Assurance and Quality Control.

Project ID: DL3886 26 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

8.0 DISCUSSION

The desktop study of the Site considered the available data on geology and groundwater, historical titles, Dangerous Goods licences, aerial photographs and heritage searches, which is in accordance with the Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites (NSW EPA, 2011).

A Site investigation was conducted and found no evidence of surface staining, odours or visible sources of contamination. The results of intrusive investigations carried out on-site reported contaminant concentrations below the adopted site acceptance criteria.

The dwelling and adjacent shed within number 315 was identified as potentially constructed with asbestos containing materials. Although all buildings were noted to be in good condition and were not considered to pose a risk of asbestos exposure, it is understood the structures will require demolition prior to redevelopment. Material that is suspected to contain asbestos will require removal by a WorkCover approved licensed contractor, and a subsequent asbestos clearance inspection.

The results of the salinity assessment undertaken on-site indicated salinity effects on the Site were mostly negligible. The results of the aggressivity assessment indicated that the soils located on-site are expected to be non-aggressive towards steel, with possible localised mild aggressivity towards concrete. On average, the pH from the Site soils was mildly acidic. The Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) of the soil samples ranged between non-sodic and sodic. The Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) of the samples were in the low range, with a single sample (SAL-3) found to be in the moderate CEC range. The Electrical Conductivity for all soil samples were found to be in the non- saline range, with salinity affects mostly negligible.

As the intended development on Site includes rezoning the Site to several residential properties, no irrigation or effluent disposal is likely to take place on Site. DLA is therefore of the opinion that a Salinity Management Plan is not required.

A dam water and sediment assessment was conducted to assess decommissioning options for the dam and whether sediments were suitable for onsite beneficial reuse. The two collected water samples from the Site identified concentrations of Total Nitrogen and copper exceeding the nominated offsite discharge criteria. All concentrations met the required onsite reuse/irrigation criteria. The two sediment samples collected from the Site complied with the onsite soil guidelines which indicated that the sediments within the dam would be suitable for onsite reuse.

Project ID: DL3886 27 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

The desktop assessment, visual historical investigation and onsite inspections indicated that the identified areas of environmental concern and potential sources of contamination have not resulted in adverse impact to the subsurface of the Site.

Project ID: DL3886 28 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

9.0 CONCLUSIONS

The sampling regime and subsequent assessment and reporting of the Site are considered adequate for the purpose of assessing the suitability of the Site for the proposed future land use in accordance with The Hills Shire Council, relevant Development Consent Conditions and the general requirements of State Environmental Planning Policy No.55 (SEPP 55). All reporting has been undertaken in accordance with the Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites (NSW EPA, 2011) and the Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (NSW EPA, 2nd ed., 2006).

A historical Site land use and activity assessment was conducted on the Site. The surrounding land use and previous owners included graziers and dairy farmers. Due to the low scale of production activities that occurred on the Site contamination from previous site use was expected to be of relatively low risk.

The results of the laboratory analysis reported no evidence of contamination of the subsurface of the Site by asbestos, petroleum hydrocarbons, PAH, pesticides, PCBs or Heavy Metals Site. The onsite dam was assessed as suitable for dewatering via application to land (i.e. irrigation), and sediments contained within the dam are considered suitable for beneficial on-site reuse. A salinity assessment indicated that the soils on-site have negligible salinity effects, while the results of an aggressivity assessment indicated that the soils located on-site are expected to be non-aggressive towards steel, with possible localised mild aggressivity towards.

As the intended development on Site includes rezoning the Site to several residential properties, no irrigation or effluent disposal is likely to take place on Site. DLA is therefore of the opinion that a Salinity Management Plan is not required.

The dwelling and adjacent shed to the east of number 315 was identified as potentially constructed with asbestos containing materials. Building materials that are suspected to contain asbestos will require removal by a WorkCover approved licensed contractor with an asbestos clearance required after removal.

It is the opinion of DLA that the assessment objectives of this report have been achieved. The PSI concludes that the Site is considered suitable for the intended land use consistent with NEPM (NEPC, 2013) Residential A – Residential with Garden / Accessible soil. The structures identified as potentially containing asbestos will require removal by a WorkCover approved contractor, disposal of material at a licenced facility and an asbestos clearance at the completion of removal.

Project ID: DL3886 29 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

10.0 REFERENCES

 Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the Management of Contaminated Sites (ANZECC/NHMRC 1992);  Code of Practice for the Safe Removal of Asbestos (NOHSC, 2nd eds, 2005);  Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 (NSW);  Contaminated Site: Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites (NSW EPA, 2011);  Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Groundwater Contamination (NSW DEC, 2007);  Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (NSW EPA, 2nd ed., 2006);  Contaminated Sites: Guidelines on Significant Risk of Harm from Contaminated Land and the Duty to Report (NSW EPA 1999);  Contaminated Sites: Sampling Design Guidelines (NSW EPA 1995);  Environmental Guidelines: Solid Waste Landfills (NSW EPA, 1996);  Guidelines for the Assessment of On-Site Containment of Contaminated Soil (ANZECC, 1999).  Health - Based Soil Investigation Levels, Imray, P & Langley, A, National Environmental Health Forum Monographs, Soil Series No. 2 (2nd Ed), South Australian Health Commission (NEHF 1998b);  How to Safely Remove Asbestos: Code of Practice (WorkCover, 2011);  National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (No.1) (NEPC, 2013);  Managing Land Contamination: Planning Guidelines, SEPP 55 - Remediation of Land (DUAP, 1998);  Storage and Handling of Dangerous Goods Code of Practice 2005; and,  Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) and associated regulations.

Project ID: DL3886 30 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

FIGURE 1 – SITE LOCATION

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court Site Location

DESIGNED: DLA SITE LOCATION COMPILED: DRAWING: CLIENT: Group Develoment Services Pty Ltd RJ 25.07.15 Unit 3/38 Leighton Place PROJ. No. 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court, NSW FIGURE: LOCATION: Hornsby, NSW 2077 DL3886 2565 1

FIGURE 2 – SITE SURVEY

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

FIGURE 3 –DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT PLAN

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court N I O I S I V D B FUTURE PUBLIC ROAD 16.0 WIDE U S

E R U T F U

(B)

3 2927.8Pò (B) 4 2117.1Pò Pò

788.4 5 2470.3 SP2 LANDS Pò

(B) 2 12 2007.71Pò 2137.26Pò

Cul-De-Sac 1 11 24Dia. 2003.15Pò 2864.05Pò 6 2003.53 (C) Pò 7 10 2001.72Pò 5581.40Pò R.O.W. Access 8.0 Wide8 2204.25 DENHAM COURT ROAD X.0 WIDE Pò

Pò (C) (B) (Road Constructed) 2627.77 9 DENHAM COURT ROAD X.0 WIDE 3523.10 (Road Constructed) Pò SP2 LANDS

MGA

0 5 10 15 20 25 50 1:1000

NOTE: Boundary Dimensions, Alignments & Areas are provisional and rounded to nearest decimal place. As such these Area are subject to final survey.

SITE DESCRIPTION PROJECT REF. PROJECT DATE DWG. STATUS DWG NUMBER SHEET No. REVISION DESCRIPTION BY ON Subdivision of Lot 131 & 132 DP1137588 Into 11 Torrens Title Lots & 1 Residue Lot. LEDC-4.0 13/05/16 DRAFT 101 1 335 Denham Court Rd Denham Court 2565 A1 SHEET DESCRIPTION COUNCIL REF. SCALE PLOT DATE DWG. REVISION OF SHEETS D e v e l o p m e n t P l a n n e r s Ɣ S u r v e y o r s Ɣ P l a n n e r s Ɣ E n g i n e e r s LGA Hor. Plan of Subdivision 1:1000 at A1 26/07/16 b 1 Liverpool SCALE: 1:2000 at A3 A FIRST ISSUE GDS 17/05/16 SCALE:

FIGURE 4 – SITE LAYOUT AND SAMPLE LOCATION

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court Project Title Legend PSI - 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court Sample ID 0 25 50 m Figure Title Client Site Boundary Sample Locaons Group Development Services Sydney Office Maitland Office Phone (02) 9476 1765 Phone (02) 4933 0001 Project No. Document No. Figure No. Date Compiled Revision No. Fax (02) 9476 1557 DL3886 S004975 2 08/07/16 RJ 1.0

APPENDIX A – DATA SUMMARY TABLE

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court * Depth relates to Depth Below Surface Level 95% UCL Procedure B Calculation Stdev Avg Max Min STATISTICAL ANALYSIS INTRA-LABORATORY DUPLICATES Sample ID DS2 DS1 S1a W2 W1 S6 S5 S4 S3 S2 S1 Depth Depth (m) 18/11/2015 4/07/2016 4/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Date -- Not Tested Chemical Report 137635 149503 149503 149503 149503 149503 149503 149503 149503 149503 149503 nd = Not Detected LOR Above Laboratory Soil Desciption NL =NL Not Limiting Comment NEPM (NEPC, 2013) Residential A Land Use Criteria (mg/kg) Bold = Detected LOR Above Laboratory

- - - - - Asbestos <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Benz 0.0 0.0 HSL: 0.5, ESL: 50 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Toluen BTEX soils- Sandy 0.0 0.0 HSL: 160, ESL: 85 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 EthylBe 0.0 0.0 HSL: 55, ESL: 70 Xylene 0.0 0.0 nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd HSL: 10, ESL: 105 RED <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 = Exceeds HIL Criteria Naph 0.0 0.0 3 <25 <25 <25 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 C6-C10 0.0 0.0 F1 HSL: 45, ESL: 180, ML: 700 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 >C10-C16 TRH TRH soils- Sandy 0.0 0.0 F2 HSL: 110, ESL: 120, ML: 1,000 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

110.0 110.0 >C16-C34 F3 110.00 HSL: NL, ESL: 300, ML: 2,500 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 >C34-C40 0.0 0.0 F4 HSL: NL, ESL: 2,800, ML: 10,000 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 BaP TEQ PAH 0.0 0.0 HIL: 3, ESL: 0.7 6 6 6

1

50 10 10 20 40

240 270 300

300 100 100 300 400

HCB

6,000 7,400

Endrin

Chlordane

Heptachlor

Endosulfan

Methoxychlor

Aldrin+Dieldrin

DDT+DDD+DDE

PAH Pesticides Heavy Metals Sample ID Depth (m) Date Chemical Report Total OC OP PCB As Cd Cr VI Cu Pb Hg Ni Zn

S1 1/07/2016 149503 nd nd nd nd nd <0.1 nd <0.1 <0.1 nd nd 6.00 <0.4 14.00 17.00 12.00 <0.1 4.00 20.00 S2 1/07/2016 149503 nd ------6.00 <0.4 17.00 19.00 19.00 <0.1 9.00 39.00 S3 1/07/2016 149503 nd nd nd nd nd <0.1 nd <0.1 <0.1 nd nd 5.00 <0.4 23.00 11.00 18.00 <0.1 8.00 18.00 S4 1/07/2016 149503 nd ------6.00 <0.4 24.00 35.00 22.00 <0.1 20.00 59.00 S5 1/07/2016 149503 nd nd nd nd nd <0.1 nd <0.1 <0.1 nd nd 7.00 <0.4 24.00 14.00 21.00 <0.1 12.00 30.00 S6 1/07/2016 149503 nd ------6.00 0.50 19.00 37.00 56.00 <0.1 10.00 94.00 DS1 1/07/2016 149503 nd nd nd nd nd - nd <0.1 - nd nd 5.00 <0.4 10.00 20.00 10.00 <0.1 6.00 38.00 DS2 1/07/2016 149503 nd nd nd nd nd <0.1 nd <0.1 <0.1 nd nd 7.00 <0.4 23.00 14.00 16.00 <0.1 8.00 20.00 W1 4/07/2016 149503 ------<1 <0.1 <1 2.00 <1 <0.05 1.00 5.00 W2 4/07/2016 149503 ------<1 <0.1 <1 2.00 <1 <0.05 1.00 5.00 INTRA-LABORATORY DUPLICATES S1a 18/11/2015 137635 nd ------4.00 <0.4 11.00 15.00 10.00 <0.1 3.00 16.00 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Min 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.5 10.0 2.0 10.0 0.0 1.0 5.0 Max 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.5 24.0 37.0 56.0 0.0 20.0 94.0 Avg #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 6.0 0.5 19.3 17.1 21.8 #DIV/0! 7.9 32.8 Stdev #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.8 #DIV/0! 5.2 11.7 14.4 #DIV/0! 5.6 27.1 Procedure B Calculation #DIV/0! 0.0 #DIV/0! 0.0 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! 0.0 0.0 95% UCL * Depth relates to Depth Below Surface Level -- Not Tested * Depth relates to Depth Below Surface Level -- Not Tested nd = Not Detected Above Laboratory LOR NL = Not Limiting Bold = Detected Above Laboratory LOR RED = Exceeds HIL Criteria

APPENDIX B – NATA CERTIFIED ANALYTICAL DATA

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 149503 Client: DLA Environmental Services Pty Ltd Unit 3, 38 Leighton Pl Hornsby NSW 2077

Attention: Russell

Sample log in details: Your Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886 No. of samples: 9 Soils 2 Waters Date samples received / completed instructions received 04/07/2016 / 04/07/2016

Analysis Details: Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data. Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received. Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices. Please refer to the last page of this report for any comments relating to the results.

Report Details: Date results requested by: / Issue Date: 11/07/16 / 11/07/16 Date of Preliminary Report: Not Issued NATA accreditation number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full. Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *.

Results Approved By:

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 1 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-1 149503-2 149503-3 149503-4 149503-5 Your Reference ------S1 S1a S2 S3 S4 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 06/07/2016

TRH C6 - C9 mg/kg <25 <25 <25 <25 <25

TRH C6 - C10 mg/kg <25 <25 <25 <25 <25

vTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX mg/kg <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 (F1) Benzene mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Toluene mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Ethylbenzene mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 m+p-xylene mg/kg <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 o-Xylene mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 naphthalene mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene % 80 71 85 77 90 vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-6 149503-7 149503-8 149503-9 Your Reference ------S5 S6 DS1 DS2 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 06/07/2016

TRH C6 - C9 mg/kg <25 <25 <25 <25

TRH C6 - C10 mg/kg <25 <25 <25 <25

vTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX mg/kg <25 <25 <25 <25 (F1) Benzene mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Toluene mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Ethylbenzene mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 m+p-xylene mg/kg <2 <2 <2 <2 o-Xylene mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 naphthalene mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene % 75 75 83 72

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 2 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886 svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-1 149503-2 149503-3 149503-4 149503-5 Your Reference ------S1 S1a S2 S3 S4 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016

TRH C10 - C14 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50

TRH C15 - C28 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

TRH C29 - C36 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

TRH >C10 -C 16 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50

TRH >C10 - C16 less mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 Naphthalene (F2)

TRH >C16 -C 34 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 110 <100

TRH >C34 -C 40 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 Surrogate o-Terphenyl % 75 77 80 83 83 svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-6 149503-7 149503-8 149503-9 Your Reference ------S5 S6 DS1 DS2 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016

TRH C10 - C14 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50

TRH C15 - C28 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100

TRH C29 - C36 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100

TRH >C10 -C 16 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50

TRH >C10 - C16 less mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 Naphthalene (F2)

TRH >C16 -C 34 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100

TRH >C34 -C 40 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 Surrogate o-Terphenyl % 83 86 85 84

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 3 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

PAHs in Soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-1 149503-2 149503-3 149503-4 149503-5 Your Reference ------S1 S1a S2 S3 S4 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Naphthalene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Acenaphthylene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Acenaphthene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Fluorene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Phenanthrene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Anthracene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Fluoranthene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Pyrene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Chrysene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Benzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero) mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half) mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL) mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Total Positive PAHs mg/kg NIL (+)VE NIL (+)VE NIL (+)VE NIL (+)VE NIL (+)VE Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14 % 104 99 103 106 106

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 4 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

PAHs in Soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-6 149503-7 149503-8 149503-9 Your Reference ------S5 S6 DS1 DS2 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Naphthalene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Acenaphthylene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Acenaphthene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Fluorene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Phenanthrene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Anthracene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Fluoranthene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Pyrene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Chrysene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Benzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero) mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half) mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL) mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Total Positive PAHs mg/kg NIL (+)VE NIL (+)VE NIL (+)VE NIL (+)VE Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14 % 103 104 105 104

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 5 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Organochlorine Pesticides in soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-1 149503-2 149503-4 149503-6 149503-8 Your Reference ------S1 S1a S3 S5 DS1 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 HCB mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 alpha-BHC mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 gamma-BHC mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 beta-BHC mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Heptachlor mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 delta-BHC mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Aldrin mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Heptachlor Epoxide mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 gamma-Chlordane mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 alpha-chlordane mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Endosulfan I mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 pp-DDE mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Dieldrin mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Endrin mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 pp-DDD mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Endosulfan II mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 pp-DDT mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Endosulfan Sulphate mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Methoxychlor mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Surrogate TCMX % 96 98 94 98 96

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 6 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Organochlorine Pesticides in soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-9 Your Reference ------DS2 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 HCB mg/kg <0.1 alpha-BHC mg/kg <0.1 gamma-BHC mg/kg <0.1 beta-BHC mg/kg <0.1 Heptachlor mg/kg <0.1 delta-BHC mg/kg <0.1 Aldrin mg/kg <0.1 Heptachlor Epoxide mg/kg <0.1 gamma-Chlordane mg/kg <0.1 alpha-chlordane mg/kg <0.1 Endosulfan I mg/kg <0.1 pp-DDE mg/kg <0.1 Dieldrin mg/kg <0.1 Endrin mg/kg <0.1 pp-DDD mg/kg <0.1 Endosulfan II mg/kg <0.1 pp-DDT mg/kg <0.1 Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg <0.1 Endosulfan Sulphate mg/kg <0.1 Methoxychlor mg/kg <0.1 Surrogate TCMX % 96

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 7 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Organophosphorus Pesticides Our Reference: UNITS 149503-1 149503-2 149503-4 149503-6 149503-8 Your Reference ------S1 S1a S3 S5 DS1 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Bromophos-ethyl mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Chlorpyriphos mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Chlorpyriphos-methyl mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Diazinon mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Dichlorvos mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Dimethoate mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Ethion mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Fenitrothion mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Malathion mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Parathion mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Ronnel mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Surrogate TCMX % 96 98 94 98 96

Organophosphorus Pesticides Our Reference: UNITS 149503-9 Your Reference ------DS2 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg <0.1 Bromophos-ethyl mg/kg <0.1 Chlorpyriphos mg/kg <0.1 Chlorpyriphos-methyl mg/kg <0.1 Diazinon mg/kg <0.1 Dichlorvos mg/kg <0.1 Dimethoate mg/kg <0.1 Ethion mg/kg <0.1 Fenitrothion mg/kg <0.1 Malathion mg/kg <0.1 Parathion mg/kg <0.1 Ronnel mg/kg <0.1 Surrogate TCMX % 96

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 8 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

PCBs in Soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-1 149503-2 149503-4 149503-6 149503-8 Your Reference ------S1 S1a S3 S5 DS1 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Aroclor 1016 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Aroclor 1221 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Aroclor 1232 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Aroclor 1242 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Aroclor 1248 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Aroclor 1254 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Aroclor 1260 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Surrogate TCLMX % 96 98 94 98 96

PCBs in Soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-9 Your Reference ------DS2 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 Aroclor 1016 mg/kg <0.1 Aroclor 1221 mg/kg <0.1 Aroclor 1232 mg/kg <0.1 Aroclor 1242 mg/kg <0.1 Aroclor 1248 mg/kg <0.1 Aroclor 1254 mg/kg <0.1 Aroclor 1260 mg/kg <0.1 Surrogate TCLMX % 96

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 9 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Acid Extractable metals in soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-1 149503-2 149503-3 149503-4 149503-5 Your Reference ------S1 S1a S2 S3 S4 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date prepared - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Arsenic mg/kg 6 4 6 5 6 Cadmium mg/kg <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 Chromium mg/kg 14 11 17 23 24 Copper mg/kg 17 15 19 11 35 Lead mg/kg 12 10 19 18 22 Mercury mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Nickel mg/kg 4 3 9 8 20 Zinc mg/kg 20 16 39 18 59

Acid Extractable metals in soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-6 149503-7 149503-8 149503-9 Your Reference ------S5 S6 DS1 DS2 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date prepared - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Arsenic mg/kg 7 6 5 7 Cadmium mg/kg <0.4 0.5 <0.4 <0.4 Chromium mg/kg 24 19 10 23 Copper mg/kg 14 37 20 14 Lead mg/kg 21 56 10 16 Mercury mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Nickel mg/kg 12 10 6 8 Zinc mg/kg 30 94 38 20

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 10 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Misc Inorg - Soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-1 149503-3 149503-4 149503-5 149503-6 Your Reference ------S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date prepared - 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 Date analysed - 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 06/07/2016 pH 1:5 soil:water pH Units 5.3 5.8 5.4 7.3 5.6 Chloride, Cl 1:5 soil:water mg/kg 660 300 100 55 110 Sulphate, SO4 mg/L 840 140 120 65 87 Electrical Conductivity µS/cm 670 350 160 140 130 Estimated Salinity* mg/kg 2,300 1,200 550 460 440

Misc Inorg - Soil Our Reference: UNITS 149503-7 Your Reference ------S6 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil

Date prepared - 06/07/2016 Date analysed - 06/07/2016 pH 1:5 soil:water pH Units 6.0 Chloride, Cl 1:5 soil:water mg/kg <10 Sulphate, SO4 mg/L 9 Electrical Conductivity µS/cm 31 Estimated Salinity* mg/kg 100

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 11 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

CEC Our Reference: UNITS 149503-1 149503-3 149503-4 149503-5 149503-6 Your Reference ------S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date prepared - 08/07/2016 08/07/2016 08/07/2016 08/07/2016 08/07/2016 Date analysed - 08/07/2016 08/07/2016 08/07/2016 08/07/2016 08/07/2016 Exchangeable Ca meq/100g 0.1 4.6 4.2 6.9 0.8 Exchangeable K meq/100g <0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 Exchangeable Mg meq/100g 10 6.9 3.4 7.2 8.6 Exchangeable Na meq/100g 2.4 0.75 0.27 1.2 0.47 Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g 13 13 8.3 16 10

CEC Our Reference: UNITS 149503-7 Your Reference ------S6 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil

Date prepared - 08/07/2016 Date analysed - 08/07/2016 Exchangeable Ca meq/100g 6.7 Exchangeable K meq/100g 0.4 Exchangeable Mg meq/100g 4.4 Exchangeable Na meq/100g 0.17 Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g 12

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 12 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Moisture Our Reference: UNITS 149503-1 149503-2 149503-3 149503-4 149503-5 Your Reference ------S1 S1a S2 S3 S4 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date prepared - 5/07/2016 5/07/2016 5/07/2016 5/07/2016 5/07/2016 Date analysed - 6/07/2016 6/07/2016 6/07/2016 6/07/2016 6/07/2016 Moisture % 21 19 14 11 13

Moisture Our Reference: UNITS 149503-6 149503-7 149503-8 149503-9 Your Reference ------S5 S6 DS1 DS2 - Date Sampled ------1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 1/07/2016 Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date prepared - 5/07/2016 5/07/2016 5/07/2016 5/07/2016 Date analysed - 6/07/2016 6/07/2016 6/07/2016 6/07/2016 Moisture % 16 19 26 24

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 13 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

HM in water - dissolved Our Reference: UNITS 149503-10 149503-11 Your Reference ------W1 W2 - Date Sampled ------4/07/2016 4/07/2016 Type of sample Water Water

Date prepared - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Date analysed - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 Arsenic-Dissolved µg/L <1 <1 Cadmium-Dissolved µg/L <0.1 <0.1 Chromium-Dissolved µg/L <1 <1 Copper-Dissolved µg/L 2 2 Lead-Dissolved µg/L <1 <1 Mercury-Dissolved µg/L <0.05 <0.05 Nickel-Dissolved µg/L 1 1 Zinc-Dissolved µg/L 5 5

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 14 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Metals in Waters - Acid extractable Our Reference: UNITS 149503-10 149503-11 Your Reference ------W1 W2 - Date Sampled ------4/07/2016 4/07/2016 Type of sample Water Water

Date prepared - 5/07/2016 5/07/2016 Date analysed - 5/07/2016 5/07/2016 Phosphorus - Total mg/L 0.1 0.2

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 15 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Miscellaneous Inorganics Our Reference: UNITS 149503-10 149503-11 Your Reference ------W1 W2 - Date Sampled ------4/07/2016 4/07/2016 Type of sample Water Water

Date prepared - 04/072016 04/072016 Date analysed - 04/07/2016 04/07/2016 pH pH Units 7.1 6.9 Salinity as NaCl* g/L 0.08 0.08 Total Nitrogen in water mg/L 2.0 1.8 Ammonia as N in water mg/L 0.36 0.31 Total Suspended Solids mg/L INS INS BOD mg/L 12 7

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 16 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Microbiologocal Testing Our Reference: UNITS 149503-10 149503-11 Your Reference ------W1 W2 - Date Sampled ------4/07/2016 4/07/2016 Type of sample Water Water

Date of testing - 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 E. Coli CFU/100m 3 A NBO 34 NBO L Faecal Coliforms CFU/100m 3 A NBO 34 NBO L

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 17 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Method ID Methodology Summary Org-016 Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS. Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS. F1 = (C6-C10)-BTEX as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater.

Org-014 Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS.

Org-003 Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-FID. F2 = (>C10-C16)-Naphthalene as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater (HSLs Tables 1A (3, 4)). Note Naphthalene is determined from the VOC analysis.

Org-012 Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-MS. Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater - 2013. For soil results:- 1. ‘TEQ PQL’ values are assuming all contributing PAHs reported as

Org-005 Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by GC with dual ECD's.

Org-008 Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by GC with dual ECD's.

Org-006 Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by GC-ECD.

Metals-020 Determination of various metals by ICP-AES.

Metals-021 Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS.

Inorg-001 pH - Measured using pH meter and electrode in accordance with APHA latest edition, 4500-H+. Please note that the results for water analyses are indicative only, as analysis outside of the APHA storage times.

Inorg-081 Anions - a range of Anions are determined by Ion Chromatography, in accordance with APHA latest edition, 4110-B. Alternatively determined by colourimetry/turbidity using Discrete Analyer.

Inorg-002 Conductivity and Salinity - measured using a conductivity cell at 25oC in accordance with APHA latest edition 2510 and Rayment & Lyons.

Inorg-034 Soil samples are extracted and measured using a conductivity cell and dedicated meter.

Metals-009 Determination of exchangeable cations and cation exchange capacity in soils using 1M Ammonium Chloride exchange and ICP-AES analytical finish.

Inorg-008 Moisture content determined by heating at 105+/-5 deg C for a minimum of 12 hours.

Metals-022 ICP-MS Determination of various metals by ICP-MS.

Inorg-055/062 Total Nitrogen - Calculation sum of TKN and oxidised Nitrogen.

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 18 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Method ID Methodology Summary Inorg-057 Ammonia - determined colourimetrically, based on APHA latest edition 4500-NH3 F. Soils are analysed following a KCl extraction.

Inorg-019 Suspended Solids - determined gravimetricially by filtration of the sample. The samples are dried at 104+/-5oC.

Inorg-091 BOD - Analysed in accordance with APHA latest edition 5210 D and in house INORG-091.

Ext-008 Subcontracted to Sonic Food & Water Testing. NATA Accreditation No. 4034.

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 19 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886 QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD Soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016 Date analysed - 06/07/2 149503-1 06/07/2016 || 06/07/2016 LCS-3 06/07/2016 016

TRH C6 - C9 mg/kg 25 Org-016 <25 149503-1 <25 || <25 LCS-3 104%

TRH C6 - C10 mg/kg 25 Org-016 <25 149503-1 <25 || <25 LCS-3 104% Benzene mg/kg 0.2 Org-016 <0.2 149503-1 <0.2 || <0.2 LCS-3 96% Toluene mg/kg 0.5 Org-016 <0.5 149503-1 <0.5 || <0.5 LCS-3 104% Ethylbenzene mg/kg 1 Org-016 <1 149503-1 <1 || <1 LCS-3 109% m+p-xylene mg/kg 2 Org-016 <2 149503-1 <2 || <2 LCS-3 105% o-Xylene mg/kg 1 Org-016 <1 149503-1 <1 || <1 LCS-3 103% naphthalene mg/kg 1 Org-014 <1 149503-1 <1 || <1 [NR] [NR] Surrogate aaa- % Org-016 84 149503-1 80 || 94 || RPD: 16 LCS-3 97% Trifluorotoluene QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD

Date extracted - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016 Date analysed - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016

TRH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 Org-003 <50 149503-1 <50 || <50 LCS-3 96%

TRH C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 Org-003 <100 149503-1 <100 || <100 LCS-3 101%

TRH C29 - C36 mg/kg 100 Org-003 <100 149503-1 <100 || <100 LCS-3 77%

TRH >C10 -C 16 mg/kg 50 Org-003 <50 149503-1 <50 || <50 LCS-3 96%

TRH >C16 -C 34 mg/kg 100 Org-003 <100 149503-1 <100 || <100 LCS-3 101%

TRH >C34 -C 40 mg/kg 100 Org-003 <100 149503-1 <100 || <100 LCS-3 77% Surrogate o-Terphenyl % Org-003 76 149503-1 75 || 81 || RPD: 8 LCS-3 84% QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery PAHs in Soil Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD

Date extracted - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016 Date analysed - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 87% Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 111% Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 101% Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 93% Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 87% Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 89% Benzo(b,j mg/kg 0.2 Org-012 <0.2 149503-1 <0.2 || <0.2 [NR] [NR] +k)fluoranthene

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 20 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886 QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery PAHs in Soil Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.05 Org-012 <0.05 149503-1 <0.05 || <0.05 LCS-3 89% Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.1 Org-012 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Surrogate p-Terphenyl- % Org-012 99 149503-1 104 || 99 || RPD: 5 LCS-3 116% d14 QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery Organochlorine Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD Pesticides in soil

Date extracted - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016 Date analysed - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016 HCB mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] alpha-BHC mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 81% gamma-BHC mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] beta-BHC mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 108% Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 77% delta-BHC mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 92% Heptachlor Epoxide mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 108% gamma-Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] alpha-chlordane mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Endosulfan I mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] pp-DDE mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 111% Dieldrin mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 108% Endrin mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 119% pp-DDD mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 96% Endosulfan II mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] pp-DDT mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Endosulfan Sulphate mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 125% Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Surrogate TCMX % Org-005 98 149503-1 96 || 98 || RPD: 2 LCS-3 84%

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 21 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886 QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery Organophosphorus Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD Pesticides

Date extracted - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016 Date analysed - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016 Azinphos-methyl mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] (Guthion) Bromophos-ethyl mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Chlorpyriphos mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 104% Chlorpyriphos-methyl mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Diazinon mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 96% Dimethoate mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Ethion mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 105% Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 99% Malathion mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 101% Parathion mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 107% Ronnel mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 127% Surrogate TCMX % Org-008 98 149503-1 96 || 98 || RPD: 2 LCS-3 84% QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery PCBs in Soil Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD

Date extracted - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016 Date analysed - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016 Aroclor 1016 mg/kg 0.1 Org-006 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Aroclor 1221 mg/kg 0.1 Org-006 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Aroclor 1232 mg/kg 0.1 Org-006 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Aroclor 1242 mg/kg 0.1 Org-006 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Aroclor 1248 mg/kg 0.1 Org-006 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Aroclor 1254 mg/kg 0.1 Org-006 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 105% Aroclor 1260 mg/kg 0.1 Org-006 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 [NR] [NR] Surrogate TCLMX % Org-006 98 149503-1 96 || 98 || RPD: 2 LCS-3 84%

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 22 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886 QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery Acid Extractable metals Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD in soil

Date prepared - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016 Date analysed - 05/07/2 149503-1 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-3 05/07/2016 016 Arsenic mg/kg 4 Metals-020 <4 149503-1 6 || 5 || RPD: 18 LCS-3 96% Cadmium mg/kg 0.4 Metals-020 <0.4 149503-1 <0.4 || <0.4 LCS-3 93% Chromium mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 149503-1 14 || 13 || RPD: 7 LCS-3 95% Copper mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 149503-1 17 || 16 || RPD: 6 LCS-3 96% Lead mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 149503-1 12 || 11 || RPD: 9 LCS-3 90% Mercury mg/kg 0.1 Metals-021 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-3 96% Nickel mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 149503-1 4 || 4 || RPD: 0 LCS-3 90% Zinc mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 149503-1 20 || 18 || RPD: 11 LCS-3 92% QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery Misc Inorg - Soil Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD

Date prepared - 06/07/2 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] 016 Date analysed - 06/07/2 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] 016 pH 1:5 soil:water pH Units Inorg-001 [NT] [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Chloride, Cl 1:5 mg/kg 10 Inorg-081 <10 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] soil:water Sulphate, SO4 mg/L 1 Inorg-081 <1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Electrical Conductivity µS/cm 1 Inorg-002 <1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Estimated Salinity* mg/kg 5 Inorg-034 <5 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery CEC Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD

Date prepared - 08/07/2 149503-1 08/07/2016 || 08/07/2016 LCS-1 08/07/2016 016 Date analysed - 08/07/2 149503-1 08/07/2016 || 08/07/2016 LCS-1 08/07/2016 016 Exchangeable Ca meq/100 0.1 Metals-009 <0.1 149503-1 0.1 || 0.1 || RPD: 0 LCS-1 120% g Exchangeable K meq/100 0.1 Metals-009 <0.1 149503-1 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-1 108% g Exchangeable Mg meq/100 0.1 Metals-009 <0.1 149503-1 10 || 12 || RPD: 18 LCS-1 116% g Exchangeable Na meq/100 0.1 Metals-009 <0.1 149503-1 2.4 || 2.8 || RPD: 15 LCS-1 116% g

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 23 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886 QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery HM in water - dissolved Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD

Date prepared - 05/07/2 149503-10 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-W1 05/07/2016 016 Date analysed - 05/07/2 149503-10 05/07/2016 || 05/07/2016 LCS-W1 05/07/2016 016 Arsenic-Dissolved µg/L 1 Metals-022 <1 149503-10 <1 || <1 LCS-W1 102% ICP-MS Cadmium-Dissolved µg/L 0.1 Metals-022 <0.1 149503-10 <0.1 || <0.1 LCS-W1 102% ICP-MS Chromium-Dissolved µg/L 1 Metals-022 <1 149503-10 <1 || <1 LCS-W1 98% ICP-MS Copper-Dissolved µg/L 1 Metals-022 <1 149503-10 2 || 2 || RPD: 0 LCS-W1 103% ICP-MS Lead-Dissolved µg/L 1 Metals-022 <1 149503-10 <1 || <1 LCS-W1 103% ICP-MS Mercury-Dissolved µg/L 0.05 Metals-021 <0.05 149503-10 <0.05 || [N/T] LCS-W1 110% Nickel-Dissolved µg/L 1 Metals-022 <1 149503-10 1 || 1 || RPD: 0 LCS-W1 103% ICP-MS Zinc-Dissolved µg/L 1 Metals-022 <1 149503-10 5 || 5 || RPD: 0 LCS-W1 102% ICP-MS QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery Metals in Waters - Acid Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD extractable

Date prepared - 5/07/20 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 5/07/2016 16 Date analysed - 5/07/20 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 5/07/2016 16 Phosphorus - Total mg/L 0.05 Metals-020 <0.05 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 115% QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Sm# Recovery Miscellaneous Inorganics Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD

Date prepared - 04/07/2 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 04/07/2016 016 Date analysed - 04/07/2 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 04/07/2016 016 pH pH Units Inorg-001 [NT] [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 102% Salinity as NaCl* g/L 0.0007 Inorg-002 <0.000 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] 7 Total Nitrogen in water mg/L 0.1 Inorg- <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 97% 055/062 Ammonia as N in water mg/L 0.005 Inorg-057 <0.005 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 100% Total Suspended Solids mg/L 5 Inorg-019 <5 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] BOD mg/L 5 Inorg-091 <5 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 93%

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 24 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886 QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Microbiologocal Testing

Date of testing - [NT] E. Coli CFU/100 1 Ext-008 <1 mL Faecal Coliforms CFU/100 1 Ext-008 <1 mL QUALITY CONTROL UNITS Dup. Sm# Duplicate Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Base + Duplicate + %RPD Soil

Date extracted - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016 Date analysed - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 06/07/2016

TRH C6 - C9 mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 97%

TRH C6 - C10 mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 97% Benzene mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 90% Toluene mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 97% Ethylbenzene mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 101% m+p-xylene mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 98% o-Xylene mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 96%

naphthalene mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Surrogate aaa- % [NT] [NT] 149503-2 89% Trifluorotoluene QUALITY CONTROL UNITS Dup. Sm# Duplicate Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil Base + Duplicate + %RPD

Date extracted - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016 Date analysed - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016

TRH C10 - C14 mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 101%

TRH C15 - C28 mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 110%

TRH C29 - C36 mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 83%

TRH >C10 -C 16 mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 101%

TRH >C16 -C 34 mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 110%

TRH >C34 -C 40 mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 83% Surrogate o-Terphenyl % [NT] [NT] 149503-2 77% QUALITY CONTROL UNITS Dup. Sm# Duplicate Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery PAHs in Soil Base + Duplicate + %RPD

Date extracted - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016 Date analysed - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016 Naphthalene mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 88% Acenaphthylene mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Acenaphthene mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Fluorene mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 111% Phenanthrene mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 104% Anthracene mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Fluoranthene mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 92% Pyrene mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 86%

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 25 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886 QUALITY CONTROL UNITS Dup. Sm# Duplicate Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery PAHs in Soil Base + Duplicate + %RPD

Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Chrysene mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 90% Benzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 85% Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14 % [NT] [NT] 149503-2 127% QUALITY CONTROL UNITS Dup. Sm# Duplicate Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery Organochlorine Pesticides Base + Duplicate + %RPD in soil

Date extracted - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016 Date analysed - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016 HCB mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] alpha-BHC mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 84% gamma-BHC mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

beta-BHC mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 111% Heptachlor mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 105% delta-BHC mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Aldrin mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 80% Heptachlor Epoxide mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 111% gamma-Chlordane mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] alpha-chlordane mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Endosulfan I mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] pp-DDE mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 105% Dieldrin mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 111% Endrin mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 120% pp-DDD mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 106% Endosulfan II mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] pp-DDT mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Endosulfan Sulphate mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 108% Methoxychlor mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Surrogate TCMX % [NT] [NT] 149503-2 97%

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 26 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886 QUALITY CONTROL UNITS Dup. Sm# Duplicate Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery Organophosphorus Base + Duplicate + %RPD Pesticides

Date extracted - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016 Date analysed - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016 Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Bromophos-ethyl mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Chlorpyriphos mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 96% Chlorpyriphos-methyl mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Diazinon mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Dichlorvos mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 94% Dimethoate mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Ethion mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 98% Fenitrothion mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 94% Malathion mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 96% Parathion mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 96% Ronnel mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 119%

Surrogate TCMX % [NT] [NT] 149503-2 97% QUALITY CONTROL UNITS Dup. Sm# Duplicate Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery PCBs in Soil Base + Duplicate + %RPD

Date extracted - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016 Date analysed - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016 Aroclor 1016 mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Aroclor 1221 mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Aroclor 1232 mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Aroclor 1242 mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Aroclor 1248 mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Aroclor 1254 mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 104% Aroclor 1260 mg/kg [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Surrogate TCLMX % [NT] [NT] 149503-2 119% QUALITY CONTROL UNITS Dup. Sm# Duplicate Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery Acid Extractable metals in Base + Duplicate + %RPD soil

Date prepared - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016 Date analysed - [NT] [NT] 149503-2 05/07/2016 Arsenic mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 76% Cadmium mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 82% Chromium mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 85% Copper mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 92% Lead mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 78% Mercury mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 92% Nickel mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 78%

Zinc mg/kg [NT] [NT] 149503-2 82%

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 27 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886 QUALITY CONTROL UNITS Dup. Sm# Duplicate Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery HM in water - dissolved Base + Duplicate + %RPD

Date prepared - [NT] [NT] 149503-11 05/07/2016 Date analysed - [NT] [NT] 149503-11 05/07/2016 Arsenic-Dissolved µg/L [NT] [NT] 149503-11 105% Cadmium-Dissolved µg/L [NT] [NT] 149503-11 107% Chromium-Dissolved µg/L [NT] [NT] 149503-11 96% Copper-Dissolved µg/L [NT] [NT] 149503-11 104% Lead-Dissolved µg/L [NT] [NT] 149503-11 105% Mercury-Dissolved µg/L [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR] Nickel-Dissolved µg/L [NT] [NT] 149503-11 100% Zinc-Dissolved µg/L [NT] [NT] 149503-11 106%

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 28 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Report Comments: Dissolved Metals: The preserved sample provided was not identified as either total or dissolved, therefore the unpreserved sample was filtered through 0.45um filter at the lab. Note: there is a possibility some elements may be underestimated.

Faecal Coliform & E.Coli analysed by Sonic Food & Water Testing. Report No. W1611395 A: Approximate NBO: The presence of competing background non-coliform organisms in the sample may have reduced the count obtained.

Total Suspended Solids: INS, Insufficient samples was provided for analysis.

Asbestos ID was analysed by Approved Identifier: Not applicable for this job Asbestos ID was authorised by Approved Signatory: Not applicable for this job

INS: Insufficient sample for this test PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit NT: Not tested NR: Test not required RPD: Relative Percent Difference NA: Test not required <: Less than >: Greater than LCS: Laboratory Control Sample

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 29 of 30 Revision No: R 00 Client Reference: Leppington PSI DL3886

Quality Control Definitions Blank: This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents, glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as for samples. Duplicate: This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample selected should be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable. Matrix Spike : A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix spike is to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferences exist. LCS (Laboratory Control Sample) : This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank sand or water) fortified with analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample. Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds which are similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.

Laboratory Acceptance Criteria Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency to meet or exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix spike recoveries for the batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria. Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is generally extracted during sample extraction. Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable. For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.

Duplicates: <5xPQL - any RPD is acceptable; >5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable. Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140% for organics (+/-50% surrogates) and 10-140% for labile SVOCs (including labile surrogates), ultra trace organics and speciated phenols is acceptable.

In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples respectively, the sample volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy laboratory QA/QC protocols.

When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of recommended technical holding times (THTs), the analysis has proceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs, every effort will be made to analyse within the THT or as soon as practicable.

Where sampling dates are not provided, Envirolab are not in a position to comment on the validity of the analysis where recommended technical holding times may have been breached.

Envirolab Reference: 149503 Page 30 of 30 Revision No: R 00

APPENDIX C – QUANLITY CONTROL / QUALITY ASSURANCE

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

APPENDIX C1 – FIELD QUALITY CONTROL

During the assessment of contaminated sites, the integrity of data collected is considered paramount. With the assessment of the Site, a number of measures were taken to ensure the quality of the data. These included:

Sample Containers Soil samples collected during the investigation were placed immediately into laboratory prepared glass jars with Teflon lid inserts. Standard identification labels were adhered to each individual container and labelled according to depth, date, sampling team and media collected.

Decontamination All equipment used in the sampling program which includes a hand auger, spades and mixing bowl was decontaminated prior to use and between samples to prevent cross contamination. Decontamination of equipment involved the following procedures:

 Cleaning equipment in potable water to remove gross contamination;  Cleaning in a solution of Decon 90; and,  Rinsing in clean demineralised water then wiping with clean lint free cloths.

Sample Tracking, Identification and Holding Times All samples were forwarded to Envirolab Services and SGS Australia under recognised chain of custodies with clear identification outlining the date, location, sampler and sample ID. All samples were recorded by the laboratory as meeting their respective holding times. The sample tracking system is considered adequate for the purposes of sample collection.

Sample Transport All samples were packed into an esky with ice from the time of collection. These were transported under chain of custody from the site to Envirolab Services Pty Ltd, NATA registered laboratories located in Chatswood and Alexandria respectively. During the project, the laboratory reported that all the samples arrived intact and were analysed within holding times for the respective analytes. Samples were kept below 4C at all times.

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

Field Duplicate Samples Field duplicate samples for soil were prepared in the field through the following process:

 A larger than normal quantity of soil is recovered from the sample location selected for duplication;  The sample is placed in a decontaminated stainless bowl and mixed as thoroughly as practicable before being divided into equal parts;  Two portions of the sub-sample are immediately transferred, one for an intra-laboratory duplicate and another as a sample; and,  Samples are placed into a labelled, laboratory supplied 250ml glass jar and sealed with an airtight, Teflon screw top lid. The fully filled jars are labelled as the sample and duplicate and immediately placed in a chilled esky.

Duplicate samples were prepared on the basis of sample numbers recovered during the field work. The duplicate sample frequency was computed using the total number of samples analysed as part of this assessment. The duplicate sample frequencies are shown below:

SOIL SAMPLES 6 Samples 1 intra-laboratory duplicate – 16.7%

An intra-laboratory duplicate rate of 16.7% was achieved, above the 10% required by the Field Quality Plan.

Comparisons were made of the laboratory test results for the duplicate samples with the original samples and the Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) calculated as difference / average in order to assess the accuracy of the sampling and laboratory test procedures. The comparisons between the duplicates and original samples indicate acceptable RPDs when they comply with criteria which are commonly set at:

 Less than 30% for inorganics and 50% for organics;  Less than five times the Laboratory LOR; and,  The difference between concentrations is less than 5% of the relevant HIL concentration.

Table C1 provides details of intra-laboratory chemical duplicates.

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

Table C1 – Calculated Intra-Laboratory RPDs for Heavy Metal Samples

HEAVY METALS DUPLICATE As Cd Cr Cu Pb Hg Ni Zn

S1 6.00 <0.4 14.00 17.00 12.00 <0.1 4.00 20.00

S1a 4.00 <0.4 11.00 15.00 10.00 <0.1 3.00 16.00 RPD 40% 0% 24% 13% 18% 0% 29% 22%

\Criteria 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 LORRPD% 4/3 0.5/0.3 1/0.3 1/0.5 1/1 0.1/0.05 1/0.5 1/0.5 (Envirolab/SG S) Field duplicates provide an indication of the whole validation process, including the sampling process, sample preparation and analysis. A single metal for the intra laboratory duplicate exceeded the DQO of 30%. The differences in concentration of arsenic in the intra-laboratory duplicate pair was reported as less than five times the LOR.

The results therefore meet the nominated DQOs.

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

APPENDIX C2 – LABORATORY ANALYTICAL AND QUALITY PLAN

The integrity of analytical data provides the second step in the QA/QC process for total data compliance. The data validation techniques adopted by DLA are based upon techniques published by the USEPA and in line with methods and guidelines adopted by the NSW EPA and outlined in the NEPM (NEPC, 2013). Descriptions are provided of the specific mechanisms used in the assessment of accuracy, precision and useability of analytical data within the project.

Blanks Blanks were used for the identification of false positive data. Laboratory blank samples were analysed. No cross contamination of samples is said to have occurred as a result of laboratory techniques provided all blanks show concentrations below the levels of detection. No results on blank samples were above the level of reporting for any determination during the project.

Spikes and Control Samples Control sample spikes were utilised for determination of matrix recovery analysis. This involves analysis of spiked control samples and their duplicates, spiked with a known concentration of relative analyte. Accuracy was assessed by calculation of the percent recovery (%R). The duplicate sample spikes were used to assess the precision of the methods used. The recoveries for all matrix spike analysis were within the acceptance criteria of 60-140%.

Duplicates Laboratory Duplicates are tested to ensure the results meet the requirements of QA/QC. The %RPD for the majority of the intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory duplicates had concentrations that complied with the criteria set for acceptable RPDs. Where deviation from the parameters set for RDPs were noted, the effects on the sampling methods and accuracy were not deemed significant.

Surrogates To assess the performance of individual organic analysis the laboratory used surrogates. Recoveries were calculated for each surrogate providing an indication of analytical accuracy. Surrogate recoveries for soil samples were all within recommended control limits, indicating that there was an acceptable degree of accuracy in analysing for organic compounds.

Laboratory Detection Limits Laboratory detection limits for soil and water analyses by Envirolab and SGS are outlined in Table C25 and Table C6 C3 below:

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

Table C5 C2 – Method of Soil Analysis: Envirolab

LEVEL OF REPORTING ANALYTE METHOD Soil mg/kg

PAH USEPA SW-846 Method 8270, 0.1 (Ind. Analyte)

Hg <0.10 USEPA 200.7 Metals As-Cd-Cr-Cu <0.10 USEPA 7471A Ni-Pb-Zn <0.5

USEPA SW-846 Method 8081 OCP 0.10 USEPA SW-846 Method 8140 Pesticides USEPA SW-846 Method 8080 OPP 0.10 USEPA SW-846 Method 8870

USEPA SW-846 Method 8080 PCB PCB 0.10 USEPA SW-846 Method 8081

Benzene 1.0 Toluene 1.0 BTEX USEPA SW-846 Method 8260 Ethylbenzene 1.0 Total Xylene 3.0 C6-C9 25 USEPA SW-846 Method 8260 C10-C14 50 TRH USEPA SW-846 Method 8000 C15-C28 100 C29-C36 100

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

APPENDIX D – GROUNDWATER WORKS DATABASE SEARCH

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court Page 1 of 2

NSW Office of Water Work Summary GW113117

Licence: 10BL605098 Licence Status: ACTIVE

Authorised Purpose MONITORING BORE (s): Intended Purpose(s): MONITORING BORE

Work Type: Bore Work Status: Equipped Construct.Method: Owner Type: Private

Commenced Date: Final Depth: Completion Date: 24/02/2012 Drilled Depth:

Contractor Name: ROCKWELL DRILLING Driller: Unkown Unknown Assistant Driller:

Property: LEPPINGTON PARK Standing Water Level: PASTORAL 1230 CAMDEN VALLEY WAY & 128 - 130 DENHAM COURT RD LEPPINGTON 2179 NSW GWMA: Salinity: GW Zone: Yield:

Site Details

Site Chosen By:

County Parish Cadastre Form A: CUMBE CUMBE.33 3//1185269 Licensed:

Region: 10 - Sydney South Coast CMA Map: River Basin: - Unknown Grid Zone: Scale: Area/District:

Elevation: 0.00 m (A.H.D.) Northing: 6238135.0 Latitude: 33°58'40.8"S Elevation Unknown Easting: 298285.0 Longitude: 150°48'59.3"E Source:

GS Map: - MGA Zone: 0 Coordinate Unknown Source:

Construction Negative depths indicate Above Ground Level; C-Cemented; SL-Slot Length; A-Aperture; GS-Grain Size; Q-Quantity; PL-Placement of Gravel Pack; PC-Pressure Cemented; S-Sump; CE-Centralisers Hole Pipe Component Type From To Outside Inside Interval Details (m) (m) Diameter Diameter (mm) (mm)

Water Bearing Zones From To Thickness WBZ Type S.W.L. D.D.L. Yield Hole Duration Salinity (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (L/s) Depth (hr) (mg/L) (m)

Geologists Log

http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/wgen/users/038879394//gw113117.wsr.htm 25/08/2016 Page 2 of 2

Drillers Log From To Thickness Drillers Description Geological Material Comments (m) (m) (m)

Remarks

29/07/2014: Nat Carling, 29-July-2014; Added status, drill method, depth & work name.

*** End of GW113117 ***

Warning To Clients: This raw data has been supplied to the NSW Office of Water by drillers, licensees and other sources. The NOW does not verify the accuracy of this data. The data is presented for use by you at your own risk. You should consider verifying this data before relying on it. Professional hydrogeological advice should be sought in interpreting and using this data.

http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/wgen/users/038879394//gw113117.wsr.htm 25/08/2016 Page 1 of 2

NSW Office of Water Work Summary GW113118

Licence: 10BL605098 Licence Status: ACTIVE

Authorised Purpose MONITORING BORE (s): Intended Purpose(s): MONITORING BORE

Work Type: Bore Work Status: Equipped Construct.Method: Owner Type: Private

Commenced Date: Final Depth: Completion Date: 22/02/2012 Drilled Depth:

Contractor Name: ROCKWELL DRILLING Driller: Unkown Unknown Assistant Driller:

Property: LEPPINGTON PARK Standing Water Level: PASTORAL 1230 CAMDEN VALLEY WAY & 128 - 130 DENHAM COURT RD LEPPINGTON 2179 NSW GWMA: Salinity: GW Zone: Yield:

Site Details

Site Chosen By:

County Parish Cadastre Form A: CUMBE CUMBE.33 1//1185269 Licensed:

Region: 10 - Sydney South Coast CMA Map: River Basin: - Unknown Grid Zone: Scale: Area/District:

Elevation: 0.00 m (A.H.D.) Northing: 6238066.0 Latitude: 33°58'42.7"S Elevation Unknown Easting: 297792.0 Longitude: 150°48'40.0"E Source:

GS Map: - MGA Zone: 0 Coordinate Unknown Source:

Construction Negative depths indicate Above Ground Level; C-Cemented; SL-Slot Length; A-Aperture; GS-Grain Size; Q-Quantity; PL-Placement of Gravel Pack; PC-Pressure Cemented; S-Sump; CE-Centralisers Hole Pipe Component Type From To Outside Inside Interval Details (m) (m) Diameter Diameter (mm) (mm)

Water Bearing Zones From To Thickness WBZ Type S.W.L. D.D.L. Yield Hole Duration Salinity (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (L/s) Depth (hr) (mg/L) (m)

Geologists Log

http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/wgen/users/038879394//gw113118.wsr.htm 25/08/2016 Page 2 of 2

Drillers Log From To Thickness Drillers Description Geological Material Comments (m) (m) (m)

Remarks

29/07/2014: Nat Carling, 29-July-2014; Added status, drill method, depth & work name.

*** End of GW113118 ***

Warning To Clients: This raw data has been supplied to the NSW Office of Water by drillers, licensees and other sources. The NOW does not verify the accuracy of this data. The data is presented for use by you at your own risk. You should consider verifying this data before relying on it. Professional hydrogeological advice should be sought in interpreting and using this data.

http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/wgen/users/038879394//gw113118.wsr.htm 25/08/2016 file:///C:/Users/Keri/AppData/Local/Temp/Temp1_gw058734.wsr.htm.zip/gw058734.wsr.htm NSW Office of Water Work Summary GW058734

Licence: Licence Status:

Authorised Purpose(s): Intended Purpose(s): IRRIGATION

Work Type: Bore Work Status: Construct.Method: Rotary Air Owner Type: Private

Commenced Date: Final Depth: Completion Date: 01/09/1981 Drilled Depth: 191.40 m

Contractor Name: Driller: Assistant Driller:

Property: Standing Water Level (m): GWMA: Salinity Description: Poor GW Zone: Yield (L/s):

Site Details

Site Chosen By:

County Parish Cadastre Form A: CUMBE CUMBE.033 6 Licensed:

Region: 10 - Sydney South Coast CMA Map: 9030-2S River Basin: 212 - HAWKESBURY RIVER Grid Zone: Scale: Area/District:

Elevation: 0.00 m (A.H.D.) Northing: 6239264.0 Latitude: 33°58'04.3"S Elevation Source: (Unknown) Easting: 298567.0 Longitude: 150°49'11.2"E

GS Map: - MGA Zone: 0 Coordinate Source: GD.,ACC.MAP

Construction 1 of 2 21/07/2015 1:59 PM file:///C:/Users/Keri/AppData/Local/Temp/Temp1_gw058734.wsr.htm.zip/gw058734.wsr.htm Negative depths indicate Above Ground Level; C-Cemented; SL-Slot Length; A-Aperture; GS-Grain Size; Q-Quantity; PL-Placement of Gravel Pack; PC-Pressure Cemented; S-Sump; CE-Centralisers Hole Pipe Component Type From To Outside Inside Interval Details (m) (m) Diameter Diameter (mm) (mm) 1 Backfill Backfill 0.00 191.40 1 1 Casing Withdrawn 0.00 1.20 203

Water Bearing Zones From To Thickness WBZ Type S.W.L. D.D.L. Yield Hole Duration Salinity (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (L/s) Depth (hr) (mg/L) (m) 160.00 167.60 7.60 Consolidated 91.40 0.32

Geologists Log Drillers Log From To Thickness Drillers Description Geological Material Comments (m) (m) (m) 0.00 6.10 6.10 Clay Clay 6.10 110.03 103.93 Shale Shale 110.03 118.57 8.54 Shale Sandstone Shale 118.57 191.41 72.84 Sandstone Some Fractured Water Supply Sandstone

Remarks

*** End of GW058734 ***

Warning To Clients: This raw data has been supplied to the NSW Office of Water by drillers, licensees and other sources. The NOW does not verify the accuracy of this data. The data is presented for use by you at your own risk. You should consider verifying this data before relying on it. Professional hydrogeological advice should be sought in interpreting and using this data.

2 of 2 21/07/2015 1:59 PM file:///C:/Users/Keri/AppData/Local/Temp/Temp1_gw058735.wsr.htm.zip/gw058735.wsr.htm NSW Office of Water Work Summary GW058735

Licence: Licence Status:

Authorised Purpose(s): Intended Purpose(s): IRRIGATION

Work Type: Bore Work Status: Construct.Method: Rotary Air Owner Type: Private

Commenced Date: Final Depth: Completion Date: 01/09/1981 Drilled Depth: 173.70 m

Contractor Name: Driller: Assistant Driller:

Property: Standing Water Level (m): GWMA: Salinity Description: Poor GW Zone: Yield (L/s):

Site Details

Site Chosen By:

County Parish Cadastre Form A: CUMBE CUMBE.033 6 Licensed:

Region: 10 - Sydney South Coast CMA Map: 9030-2S River Basin: 212 - HAWKESBURY RIVER Grid Zone: Scale: Area/District:

Elevation: 0.00 m (A.H.D.) Northing: 6239235.0 Latitude: 33°58'05.3"S Elevation Source: (Unknown) Easting: 298619.0 Longitude: 150°49'13.2"E

GS Map: - MGA Zone: 0 Coordinate Source: GD.,ACC.MAP

Construction 1 of 2 21/07/2015 2:00 PM file:///C:/Users/Keri/AppData/Local/Temp/Temp1_gw058735.wsr.htm.zip/gw058735.wsr.htm Negative depths indicate Above Ground Level; C-Cemented; SL-Slot Length; A-Aperture; GS-Grain Size; Q-Quantity; PL-Placement of Gravel Pack; PC-Pressure Cemented; S-Sump; CE-Centralisers Hole Pipe Component Type From To Outside Inside Interval Details (m) (m) Diameter Diameter (mm) (mm) 1 Backfill Backfill 0.00 173.70 1 1 Casing Withdrawn 0.00 14.00 165

Water Bearing Zones From To Thickness WBZ Type S.W.L. D.D.L. Yield Hole Duration Salinity (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (L/s) Depth (hr) (mg/L) (m) 152.70 158.50 5.80 Consolidated 91.40 0.32

Geologists Log Drillers Log From To Thickness Drillers Description Geological Material Comments (m) (m) (m) 0.00 4.27 4.27 Clay Clay 4.27 5.18 0.91 Shale Weathered Shale 5.18 117.35 112.17 Shale Black Shale 117.35 173.74 56.39 Sandstone Some Fractured Water Supply Sandstone

Remarks

*** End of GW058735 ***

Warning To Clients: This raw data has been supplied to the NSW Office of Water by drillers, licensees and other sources. The NOW does not verify the accuracy of this data. The data is presented for use by you at your own risk. You should consider verifying this data before relying on it. Professional hydrogeological advice should be sought in interpreting and using this data.

2 of 2 21/07/2015 2:00 PM file:///C:/Users/Keri/AppData/Local/Temp/Temp1_gw111852.wsr.htm.zip/gw111852.wsr.htm NSW Office of Water Work Summary GW111852

Licence: 10BL605091 Licence Status: ACTIVE

Authorised Purpose(s): MONITORING BORE Intended Purpose(s): MONITORING BORE

Work Type: Bore Work Status: Equipped Construct.Method: Auger - Solid Flight Owner Type: Private

Commenced Date: Final Depth: 6.00 m Completion Date: 22/02/2012 Drilled Depth: 6.00 m

Contractor Name: ROCKWELL DRILLING Driller: William Joseph Smith Assistant Driller: Carlo Antoniazzo

Property: SECCO 1322 CAMDEN VALLEY WAY Standing Water Level: 1.500 LEPPINGTON 2179 NSW GWMA: Salinity: GW Zone: Yield:

Site Details

Site Chosen By:

County Parish Cadastre Form A: CUMBE CUMBE.33 2//518718 Licensed:

Region: 10 - Sydney South Coast CMA Map: 9030-2S River Basin: 212 - HAWKESBURY RIVER Grid Zone: Scale: Area/District:

Elevation: 0.00 m (A.H.D.) Northing: 6239181.0 Latitude: 33°58'07.2"S Elevation Source: Unknown Easting: 298770.0 Longitude: 150°49'19.0"E

GS Map: - MGA Zone: 0 Coordinate Source: GPS - Global Positioning System

1 of 3 21/07/2015 1:59 PM file:///C:/Users/Keri/AppData/Local/Temp/Temp1_gw111852.wsr.htm.zip/gw111852.wsr.htm

Construction Negative depths indicate Above Ground Level; C-Cemented; SL-Slot Length; A-Aperture; GS-Grain Size; Q-Quantity; PL-Placement of Gravel Pack; PC-Pressure Cemented; S-Sump; CE-Centralisers Hole Pipe Component Type From To Outside Inside Interval Details (m) (m) Diameter Diameter (mm) (mm) 1 Hole Hole 0.00 6.00 110 Auger - Solid Flight 1 Annulus Drill Cuttings 0.00 1.50 110 50 PL:Poured/Shovelled 1 Annulus Bentonite 1.50 2.50 110 50 PL:Poured/Shovelled 1 Annulus Waterworn/Rounded 2.50 6.00 100 50 Graded, PL:Poured/Shovelled 1 1 Casing Pvc Class 18 -0.10 3.00 50 40 Seated on Bottom, Screwed 1 1 Opening Slots - Horizontal 3.00 6.00 50 1 Mechanically Slotted, PVC Class 18, Screwed, SL: 35.0mm, A: 4.00mm

Water Bearing Zones From To Thickness WBZ Type S.W.L. D.D.L. Yield Hole Duration Salinity (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (L/s) Depth (hr) (mg/L) (m) 2.00 6.00 4.00 Unknown 1.50

Geologists Log Drillers Log From To Thickness Drillers Description Geological Material Comments (m) (m) (m) 0.00 0.20 0.20 Fill; silty clay, orange brown, heterogenous, soft, Fill medium plasticity, damp 0.20 0.60 0.40 Fill; silty clay, grey brown, inclusions of fine gravels Fill & shale, heterogenous, soft, damp, medium plasticity 0.60 1.20 0.60 Fill; silty clay, light grey, inclusions of fine gravels & Fill shale, increasing gravel, heterogenous, soft, damp, medium pl 1.20 2.50 1.30 Fill; silty clay, as above, incusions of fine gravels & Fill shale, gravels increasing 2.50 2.80 0.30 Clay; dark grey, homogenous, soft, moist, Clay medium-high plasticity 2.80 3.00 0.20 Clay, silty; light grey with yellow, homogenous, firm, Clay wet, medium plasticity 3.00 4.50 1.50 Clay, silty; as above, saturated, Clay 4.50 6.00 1.50 Clay, silty; as above, stiff, inclusions of coarse shale Unknown gravel

Remarks

28/06/2013: Nat Carling, 28-June-2013; Updated details, as provided on the Form-A & consultant log.

2 of 3 21/07/2015 1:59 PM file:///C:/Users/Keri/AppData/Local/Temp/Temp1_gw111852.wsr.htm.zip/gw111852.wsr.htm

*** End of GW111852 ***

Warning To Clients: This raw data has been supplied to the NSW Office of Water by drillers, licensees and other sources. The NOW does not verify the accuracy of this data. The data is presented for use by you at your own risk. You should consider verifying this data before relying on it. Professional hydrogeological advice should be sought in interpreting and using this data.

3 of 3 21/07/2015 1:59 PM Page 1 of 2

NSW Office of Water Work Summary GW111854

Licence: 10BL605098 Licence Status: ACTIVE

Authorised Purpose MONITORING BORE (s): Intended Purpose(s): MONITORING BORE

Work Type: Bore Work Status: Equipped Construct.Method: Rotary - Percussion (Down Hole Hammer) Owner Type: Private

Commenced Date: Final Depth: 9.93 m Completion Date: 24/02/2012 Drilled Depth: 9.93 m

Contractor Name: ROCKWELL DRILLING Driller: William Joseph Smith Assistant Driller: Carlo Antoniazzo

Property: LEPPINGTON PARK Standing Water Level: PASTORAL 1230 CAMDEN VALLEY WAY & 128 - 130 DENHAM COURT RD LEPPINGTON 2179 NSW GWMA: Salinity: GW Zone: Yield:

Site Details

Site Chosen By:

County Parish Cadastre Form A: CUMBE CUMBE.33 33//1439 Licensed:

Region: 10 - Sydney South Coast CMA Map: 9030-2S River Basin: 212 - HAWKESBURY RIVER Grid Zone: Scale: Area/District:

Elevation: 0.00 m (A.H.D.) Northing: 6238258.0 Latitude: 33°58'37.4"S Elevation Unknown Easting: 299118.0 Longitude: 150°49'31.8"E Source:

GS Map: - MGA Zone: 0 Coordinate GPS - Global Source: Positioning System

Construction Negative depths indicate Above Ground Level; C-Cemented; SL-Slot Length; A-Aperture; GS-Grain Size; Q-Quantity; PL-Placement of Gravel Pack; PC-Pressure Cemented; S-Sump; CE-Centralisers Hole Pipe Component Type From To Outside Inside Interval Details (m) (m) Diameter Diameter (mm) (mm) 1 Hole Hole 0.00 9.93 110 Rotary - Percussion (Down Hole Hammer) 1 Annulus Drill Cuttings 0.00 5.50 110 50 PL:Poured/Shovelled 1 Annulus Bentonite 5.50 6.50 110 50 PL:Poured/Shovelled 1 Annulus Waterworn/Rounded 6.50 9.90 110 50 Graded, PL:Poured/Shovelled 1 1 Casing Pvc Class 18 -0.10 6.50 50 40 Seated on Bottom, Screwed 1 1 Opening Slots - Horizontal 6.50 9.90 50 1

http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/wgen/users/038879394//gw111854.wsr.htm 25/08/2016 Page 2 of 2

Casing - Machine Slotted, PVC Class 18, Screwed, SL: 35.0mm, A: 4.00mm

Water Bearing Zones From To Thickness WBZ Type S.W.L. D.D.L. Yield Hole Duration Salinity (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (L/s) Depth (hr) (mg/L) (m)

Geologists Log Drillers Log From To Thickness Drillers Description Geological Material Comments (m) (m) (m) 0.00 0.20 0.20 Fill; silty clay, brown, heterogenous, Fill soft to firm, medium plasticity, with inclusions of rubber & plastic 0.20 1.30 1.10 Clay, silty; orange brown, firm to stiff, Clay heterogenous, dry to damp, medium plasticity 1.30 2.00 0.70 Clay, silty; as above, orange brown Clay with grey mottling 2.00 2.50 0.50 Clay, silty; as above, grey, Clay homogenous 2.50 3.20 0.70 Shale/Silty Clay; weathered shale/silty Shale clay, grey, stiff, dry to damp, poorly sorted 3.20 9.93 6.73 Shale; grey, homogenous, dry to damp Shale

Remarks

28/06/2013: Nat Carling, 28-June-2013; Updated details, as provided on the Form-A & consultant log.

*** End of GW111854 ***

Warning To Clients: This raw data has been supplied to the NSW Office of Water by drillers, licensees and other sources. The NOW does not verify the accuracy of this data. The data is presented for use by you at your own risk. You should consider verifying this data before relying on it. Professional hydrogeological advice should be sought in interpreting and using this data.

http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/wgen/users/038879394//gw111854.wsr.htm 25/08/2016 file:///C:/Users/Keri/AppData/Local/Temp/Temp1_gw112435.wsr.htm.zip/gw112435.wsr.htm NSW Office of Water Work Summary GW112435

Licence: 10BL605098 Licence Status: ACTIVE

Authorised Purpose(s): MONITORING BORE Intended Purpose(s): MONITORING BORE

Work Type: Bore Work Status: Equipped Construct.Method: Down Hole Hammer Owner Type: Private

Commenced Date: Final Depth: 9.00 m Completion Date: 22/02/2012 Drilled Depth: 9.00 m

Contractor Name: ROCKWELL DRILLING Driller: William Joseph Smith Assistant Driller: Carlo Antoniazzo

Property: LEPPINGTON PARK PASTORAL 1230 Standing Water Level: 8.500 CAMDEN VALLEY WAY & 128 - 130 DENHAM COURT RD LEPPINGTON 2179 NSW GWMA: Salinity: GW Zone: Yield:

Site Details

Site Chosen By:

County Parish Cadastre Form A: CUMBE CUMBE.33 41//1174145 Licensed:

Region: 10 - Sydney South Coast CMA Map: 9030-2S River Basin: 212 - HAWKESBURY RIVER Grid Zone: Scale: Area/District:

Elevation: 0.00 m (A.H.D.) Northing: 6238823.0 Latitude: 33°58'18.3"S Elevation Source: Unknown Easting: 298016.0 Longitude: 150°48'49.4"E

1 of 3 21/07/2015 1:57 PM file:///C:/Users/Keri/AppData/Local/Temp/Temp1_gw112435.wsr.htm.zip/gw112435.wsr.htm GS Map: - MGA Zone: 0 Coordinate Source: GPS - Global Positioning System

Construction Negative depths indicate Above Ground Level; C-Cemented; SL-Slot Length; A-Aperture; GS-Grain Size; Q-Quantity; PL-Placement of Gravel Pack; PC-Pressure Cemented; S-Sump; CE-Centralisers Hole Pipe Component Type From To Outside Inside Interval Details (m) (m) Diameter Diameter (mm) (mm) 1 Hole Hole 0.00 9.00 110 Down Hole Hammer 1 Annulus Drill Cuttings 0.00 4.50 110 60 PL:Poured/Shovelled 1 Annulus Bentonite 4.50 5.50 110 60 PL:Poured/Shovelled 1 Annulus Waterworn/Rounded 5.50 9.00 110 60 Graded, PL:Poured/Shovelled 1 1 Casing Pvc Class 18 -0.10 6.00 50 40 Seated on Bottom, Screwed 1 1 Opening Slots - Horizontal 6.00 9.00 50 1 Mechanically Slotted, PVC Class 18, Screwed, SL: 35.0mm, A: 4.00mm

Water Bearing Zones From To Thickness WBZ Type S.W.L. D.D.L. Yield Hole Duration Salinity (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (L/s) Depth (hr) (mg/L) (m)

Geologists Log Drillers Log From To Thickness Drillers Description Geological Material Comments (m) (m) (m) 0.00 0.50 0.50 Clay, silty; brown, homogenous, moist, soft to firm, Clay medium plasticity 0.50 2.00 1.50 Clay, silty; as above, orange brown, damp, stiff Clay 2.00 2.50 0.50 Clay, silty; as above, grey Clay 2.50 4.50 2.00 Shale; grey, homogenous, dry, stiff Shale 4.50 9.00 4.50 Shale; as above, damp Shale

Remarks

22/02/2012: Form A Remarks: Nat Carling, 28-June-2013; GPS provided on consultants log.

*** End of GW112435 ***

2 of 3 21/07/2015 1:57 PM file:///C:/Users/Keri/AppData/Local/Temp/Temp1_gw112435.wsr.htm.zip/gw112435.wsr.htm

Warning To Clients: This raw data has been supplied to the NSW Office of Water by drillers, licensees and other sources. The NOW does not verify the accuracy of this data. The data is presented for use by you at your own risk. You should consider verifying this data before relying on it. Professional hydrogeological advice should be sought in interpreting and using this data.

3 of 3 21/07/2015 1:57 PM Page 1 of 2

NSW Office of Water Work Summary GW113116

Licence: 10BL605098 Licence Status: ACTIVE

Authorised Purpose MONITORING BORE (s): Intended Purpose(s): MONITORING BORE

Work Type: Bore Work Status: Equipped Construct.Method: Owner Type: Private

Commenced Date: Final Depth: Completion Date: 22/02/2012 Drilled Depth:

Contractor Name: ROCKWELL DRILLING Driller: Unkown Unknown Assistant Driller:

Property: LEPPINGTON PARK Standing Water Level: PASTORAL 1230 CAMDEN VALLEY WAY & 128 - 130 DENHAM COURT RD LEPPINGTON 2179 NSW GWMA: Salinity: GW Zone: Yield:

Site Details

Site Chosen By:

County Parish Cadastre Form A: CUMBE CUMBE.33 3//1185269 Licensed:

Region: 10 - Sydney South Coast CMA Map: River Basin: - Unknown Grid Zone: Scale: Area/District:

Elevation: 0.00 m (A.H.D.) Northing: 6238854.0 Latitude: 33°58'17.3"S Elevation Unknown Easting: 298055.0 Longitude: 150°48'50.9"E Source:

GS Map: - MGA Zone: 0 Coordinate Unknown Source:

Construction Negative depths indicate Above Ground Level; C-Cemented; SL-Slot Length; A-Aperture; GS-Grain Size; Q-Quantity; PL-Placement of Gravel Pack; PC-Pressure Cemented; S-Sump; CE-Centralisers Hole Pipe Component Type From To Outside Inside Interval Details (m) (m) Diameter Diameter (mm) (mm)

Water Bearing Zones From To Thickness WBZ Type S.W.L. D.D.L. Yield Hole Duration Salinity (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (L/s) Depth (hr) (mg/L) (m)

Geologists Log

http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/wgen/users/038879394//gw113116.wsr.htm 25/08/2016 Page 2 of 2

Drillers Log From To Thickness Drillers Description Geological Material Comments (m) (m) (m)

Remarks

29/07/2014: Nat Carling, 29-July-2014; Added status, drill method, depth & work name.

*** End of GW113116 ***

Warning To Clients: This raw data has been supplied to the NSW Office of Water by drillers, licensees and other sources. The NOW does not verify the accuracy of this data. The data is presented for use by you at your own risk. You should consider verifying this data before relying on it. Professional hydrogeological advice should be sought in interpreting and using this data.

http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/wgen/users/038879394//gw113116.wsr.htm 25/08/2016

APPENDIX E – LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL SECTION 149 CERTIFICATE

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

APPENDIX F – DANGEROUS GOODS SEARCH

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

APPENDIX G – EPA CONTAMINATED LANDS SEARCH

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court DECCW | Search results http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prclmapp/searchresults.aspx?&LGA=86&...

Healthy Environment, Healthy Community, Healthy Business

Home > Contaminated land > Record of notices

Search results Your search for:LGA: Liverpool City Council Matched 12 notices relating to 2 sites.

Suburb Address Site Name Notices related to this site CHIPPING 85-107 Alfred STREET Former ACR 3 current NORTON MOOREBANK1 Bapaume Road (a) ABB Australia Pty Ltd 1 current and OTHER 8 former

Page 1 of 1

21 July 2015

Connect Feedback Contact Government About

Web support Contact us NSW Government Accessibility Public consultation Offices jobs.nsw Disclaimer Report pollution Privacy Copyright

1 of 1 21/07/2015 3:44 PM

APPENDIX H – HISTORICAL TITLE SEARCH

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court

APPENDIX I – HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS

Project ID: DL3886 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court Project Title Legend PSI - 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court Approximate Site Boundary Figure Title Client Historical Aerial Photographs Group Development Services Sydney Office Maitland Office Phone (02) 9476 1765 Phone (02) 4933 0001 Project No. Document No. Year Date Compiled Revision No. Fax (02) 9476 1557 DL3886 S004761 1947 08/07/16 RJ 1.0 Project Title Legend PSI - 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court Approximate Site Boundary Figure Title Client Historical Aerial Photographs Group Development Services Sydney Office Maitland Office Phone (02) 9476 1765 Phone (02) 4933 0001 Project No. Document No. Year Date Compiled Revision No. Fax (02) 9476 1557 DL3886 S004761 1956 08/07/16 RJ 1.0 Project Title Legend PSI - 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court Approximate Site Boundary Figure Title Client Historical Aerial Photographs Group Development Services Sydney Office Maitland Office Phone (02) 9476 1765 Phone (02) 4933 0001 Project No. Document No. Year Date Compiled Revision No. Fax (02) 9476 1557 DL3886 S004761 1975 08/07/16 RJ 1.0 Project Title Legend PSI - 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court Approximate Site Boundary Figure Title Client Historical Aerial Photographs Group Development Services Sydney Office Maitland Office Phone (02) 9476 1765 Phone (02) 4933 0001 Project No. Document No. Year Date Compiled Revision No. Fax (02) 9476 1557 DL3886 S004761 1986 08/07/16 RJ 1.0 Project Title Legend PSI - 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court Approximate Site Boundary Figure Title Client Historical Aerial Photographs Group Development Services Sydney Office Maitland Office Phone (02) 9476 1765 Phone (02) 4933 0001 Project No. Document No. Year Date Compiled Revision No. Fax (02) 9476 1557 DL3886 S004761 1994 08/07/16 RJ 1.0 Project Title Legend PSI - 315-335 Denham Court Road, Denham Court Approximate Site Boundary Figure Title Client Historical Aerial Photographs Group Development Services Sydney Office Maitland Office Phone (02) 9476 1765 Phone (02) 4933 0001 Project No. Document No. Year Date Compiled Revision No. Fax (02) 9476 1557 DL3886 S004761 2004 08/07/16 RJ 1.0