External Evaluation of Phase I of the Pbf Showcase Project in Borena

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

External Evaluation of Phase I of the Pbf Showcase Project in Borena » EVALUATION REPORT MARCH 2019 EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF PHASE I OF THE PBF SHOWCASE PROJECT IN BORENA Workie Mitiku Eshete Yilma February 18, 2019 EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF PHASE 1 OF THE PBF SHOW CASE PROJECT IN BORENA ACKNOWLEDGemeNTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The evaluation team would like to acknowledge several colleagues from Cordaid Head Office and Cordaid Addis Ababa Office for their inputs, support and guidance throughout the evaluation process. In particular, the team is grateful to Inge and Maarten from Cordaid head Office and Fikremariam Gezahegn from Cordaid Addis Ababa Office for their valuable comments on the evaluation design, tools, and report preparation, all of which improved the quality of this evaluation report. We also acknowledge Nurky Ibrahim and Gelgelo Hallke from Cordaid Yabelo Borena Office. Without their support, vital appointments with key informants at zonal, woreda, facility and community levels and data collection would not have been successful. Finally, we are very grateful to all the key informants and focus group discussion participants at the federal, regional, zonal, woreda, facility, and community levels for their open and honest views on the performance of the project. 2 MARCH 2019 © CORDAID CONTENTS EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF PHASE 1 OF THE PBF SHOW CASE PROJECT IN BORENA CONTENTS acknowledgments ........................................................................................................2 acronyms. 5 executive summary ...................................................................................................... 6 1. introduction ........................................................................................................... 8 2. purpose and scope of evaluation ................................................................................. 9 3. methodology .........................................................................................................10 4. findings ................................................................................................................ 12 4.1 Qualitative findings (Evaluation Question No.1) ........................................................... 12 4.2 Quantitative Findings (Evaluation Question No.2). 16 5. conclusions and lessons learnt ..................................................................................23 6. recommendations ....................................................................................................25 annexes Annex A: Figures on quality scores by Health Facility ..............................................................26 Annex B: Tor for an external evaluation of phase I PBF showcase Project in Borena Zone ...................28 Annex C : Questionnaire for the evaluation ..........................................................................32 Annex D: List of people consulted .....................................................................................37 Annex E : References .................................................................................................... 41 MARCH 2019 © CORDAID 3 EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF PHASE 1 OF THE PBF SHOW CASE PROJECT IN BORENA CONTENTS list of tables Table 1: Evaluation Design Matrix .....................................................................................10 Table 2: List of Woreda Health offices and Health Facilities Visited ...............................................11 list of figures Figure 1: Outpatient consultations including under-five children for all 8 health centers, 2008-2010 ...... 17 Figure 2: Consultations including under-five children by health center, 2008-2010 ........................... 17 Figure 3: First ANC visit within 16 weeks of Pregnancy for all 8 health Centers, 2008-2010 ................. 17 Figure 4: First ANC visit within 16 weeks of Pregnancy by health Center, 2008-2010. 17 Figure 5: ANC Visits (4 times) for all 8 health centers, 2008-2010 ................................................ 18 Figure 6: ANC visits (4 times) by Health center, 2008-2010. 18 Figure 7: Skilled Deliveries excluding Caesarean section for all 8 Health Centers, 2008-2010 ............... 18 Figure 8: Skilled Deliveries excluding Caesarean section by health center, 2008-2010 ....................... 18 Figure 9: Postnatal care visit (1) for all 8 health centers, 2008-2010 ............................................ 19 Figure 10: Postnatal care visit (1) by health center, 2008-2010 ................................................... 19 Figure 11: Beneficiaries of long term Family Planning Methods for all 8 Health Centers, 2008-2010 ....... 19 Figure 12: Beneficiaries of Long term Family Planning Methods by Health Center, 2008-2010 .............. 19 Figure 13: Cases of Sexually Transmitted Infections treated for all 8 Health Centers, 2008-2010. 20 Figure 14: Cases of Sexually Transmitted Infections treated by health center, 2008-2010 ...................20 4 MARCH 2019 © CORDAID ACRONymS EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF PHASE 1 OF THE PBF SHOW CASE PROJECT IN BORENA ACRONYMS ANC: Antenatal Care CBO: Community Based Organizations CBHI: Community Based Health Insurance Cordaid: Catholic Organisation for Relief and Development Aid DHIS: District Health Information System FMOH: Federal ministry of Health FDG: Focus Group Discussion FGB: Facility Governance Board HEP: Health Extension Program HMIS: Health Management Information System HSTP: Health Sector Transformation Plan ORHB: Oromia Regional Health Bureau PBF: Performance Based Financing WHOs: Woreda Health Offices ZHO: Zonal Health Office MARCH 2019 © CORDAID 5 EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF PHASE 1 OF THE PBF SHOW CASE PROJECT IN BORENA EXecUTIVE SUmmary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background equity through remoteness bonus. The evaluation team is Cordaid has been financing and implementing Phase I of the impressed with the extraordinary achievements of the Performance Based Financing (PBF) showcase project in project and found out that the PBF approach was effective Borena, Ethiopia, starting on May 2015 running through June and game changing. Because of the dependency of more 2018 in 9 health facilities (Yabelo hospital and 8 health centers) payment to increased results in health outcomes, the in the four woredas of the Borena zone. The main objectives of financial incentives to the staff, the autonomy given to the PBF showcase project were improving the quantity (cover- health mangers to make decisions on the use of the subsidy age), quality of health services and the health information of the project significantly improved the behaviors of the system through the implementation of a new approach, and health workers and managers motivating them to achieve introducing output/performance-based financing, shifting more health outcomes. away from the conventional input-based financing. The project has also created effective health information Evaluation Purpose system through the establishment of an independent body The general objectives of the external evaluation was to for the verification of reported data, with the consequences document lessons from the implementation of the showcase of health facilities losing money for reporting incorrect data, project and generate evidences / findings for the scale-up of the creating an accurate health information system in the program to other zones and regions in Ethiopia. Specifically, project area. the evaluation assessed: b. Extent of progress on quantity and quality of health 1. the consistency and effectiveness of the PBF approach/six services/Quantitative Findings: elements and 2. to what extent Phase I of the PBF showcase project has Relevance: The evaluation found out that the PBF project and improved the quantity, quality, equity of health services its approach is highly relevant to the implementation of three and health information system. transformation agenda of the health sector transformation plan (HSTP): Transformation in equity and quality of health care since it Evaluation Methodology works in hard to reach area and enhances quality, Information Revolution The external evaluation used a mixed methodology including: by putting in place checks and balance system through its a. Review of existing project documents; sample of the independent verification process ,Caring, respectful and compas- monthly quantitative reports, verification reports, quarterly sionate health workforce through the promotion of autonomy and quality assessment reports, sample of contracts, sample of financial incentive mechanisms. health facility business plan, the Project Implementation Manual, baseline data and internal review reports and other Effectiveness: The project uses 21 indicators for health centers relevant PBF documents; and 18 indicators for the hospital to measure the progress b. Key informant interview (KII) with Cordaid Addis and Yabelo in quantity of preventive and curative services over time. Office, FMOH, Borena Zone Health Office, Oromia Regional The evidences show that at the health center level, significant Health Bureau, Federal Ministry of Health, four Woreda progress has been made in quantity of health services in Health Offices, Yabelo Hospital, seven health centers and all of the eight health centers covered under the program. CBOs; For example, in some of the health centers such as Did - Yabelo c. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with direct beneficiaries of and Dikale, health service utilization in outpatient consulta- the target population; and tion including children under five has increased seven-fold d. Quantitative data analysis
Recommended publications
  • Sero-Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Camel Brucellosis in Southern Lowland of Ethiopia
    Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research Research Article *Corresponding author Wubishet Z, Ministry of Agriculture Diseases Prevention and Control Directorate, Addis Ababa university, Sero-Prevalence and Associated Ethiopia, Tel: 251-912194164; Email: wubevet1921@ gmail.com Submitted: 23 January 2020 Risk Factors of Camel Brucellosis Accepted: 07 February 2020 Published: 13 February 2020 ISSN: 2379-948X in Southern lowland of Ethiopia Copyright © 2020 Jara et al. 1 2 2 2 1 Jara R , Alemayehu M , Wubishet Z *, Mesfin T , and Araya M OPEN ACCESS 1College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal science, University of Gondar, Ethiopia Keywords 2Ministry of Agriculture, Diseases Prevention and Control Directorate, Ethiopia • Camel Brucellosis; Borena; i-ELISA; RBPT; Risk factors; Sero-prevalence Abstract Brucellosis is a highly infectious bacterial disease of global significance, which affects a wide variety of animals as well as humans. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Yabello and Gomole districts of Borena Zone, Oromia Region, and Southern Ethiopia, to determine the seroprevalence of camel brucellosis and associated risk factors in the selected pastoralist area. The two study districts were purposively selected based on their potential camel population and their accessibility due to a lack of sufficient logistics. Totally 368 of camels from selected districts were included in the study. All serum samples were tested and screened serologically using Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) and confirmed using Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (i-ELISA) test. As a result, 46 (12.5%) were the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) reactors in which 11(3%) were confirmed to be positive by using Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (i-ELISA) test.
    [Show full text]
  • Sero-Prevalence and Associated Risk Factor of Bovine Brucellosis in Borena Zone, Southern Ethiopia
    ACTA SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL SCIENCES (ISSN: 2582-0931) Volume 3 Issue 11 November 2019 Research Article Sero-Prevalence and Associated Risk Factor of Bovine Brucellosis in Borena Zone, Southern Ethiopia Gelma D1, Iyob H1, Alemayehu M2 and Wubishet Z1,2* 1Wollega University College of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Nekemte, Ethiopia 2Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Diseases Control and Prevention Directorate, Ethiopia *Corresponding Author: Wubishet Z, Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Diseases Control and Prevention Directorate, Ethiopia. Received: October 18, 2019; Published: October 29, 2019 DOI: 10.31080/ASMS.2019.03.0453 Abstract Cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2017 to April 2018 to determine seroprevalence of Bovine brucellosis and associated risk factors in selected District of Borana Zone, Oromia Regional state. A total number of 339 blood samples were collected from extensively managed cattle of Indigenous Borana breed and tested for the presence of brucella antibodies using Rose Bengal 16 samples was positive with overall seroprevalence of 4.7% that was recorded in the area. Among the risk factors abortion history Plate Test (RBPT). The Rose Bengal plate test positive sample was subjected to ELISA for confirmation. From 20 RBPT sera samples and retain Fetal membrane were found significantly associated with seropositivity with p < 0.05. This study indicated that female positive with 1.4% prevalence. The study revealed study districts variation showed highest sero prevalence of 9.0% at Yabello dis- affected than male from sera prevalence of female 5.6%, in which among 265 females, (n = 15) was positive and 74 male, (n = 1) was trict, whereas the least (2.6%) at Elwayya district with significant difference of (P = 0.028, OR = 6.352).
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA IDP Situation Report May 2019
    ETHIOPIA IDP Situation Report May 2019 Highlights • Government return operations continue at full scale and sites are being dismantled. • Where security is assured and rehabilitation support provided, IDPs have opted to return to their areas of origin. IDPs who still feel insecure and have experienced trauma prefer to relocate elsewhere or integrate within the community. Management of IDP preferences differs in every IDP caseload. • There is minimal to no assistance in areas of return. Local authorities have requested international partner sup- port to address the gap. Meanwhile, public-private initiatives continue to fundraise for the rehabilitation of IDPs. • The living condition of the already vulnerable host communities has deteriorated having shared their limited resources with the IDPs for over a year. I. Displacement context Government IDP return operations have been implemented at full scale since early May 2019 following the 8 April 2019 announcement of the Federal Government’s Strategic Plan to Address Internal Displacement and a costed Re- covery/Rehabilitation Plan. By end May, most IDP sites/camps were dismantled, in particular in East/West Wollega and Gedeo/West Guji zones. Humanitarian partners have increased their engagement with Government at all levels aiming to improve the implementation of the Government return operation, in particular advocating for the returns to happen voluntarily, in safety, sustainably and with dignity. Overall, humanitarian needs remain high in both areas of displacement and of return. Most assistance in displace- ment areas is disrupted following the mass Government return operation and the dismantling of sites, while assis- tance in areas of return remain scant to non-existent, affecting the sustainability of the returns.
    [Show full text]
  • 191120 Agriculture Sector Part
    ETHIOPIA: AGRICULTURE SECTOR HRP PARTNERS OPERATIONAL PRESENCE - November 2019 TOTAL PARTNERS AND DONORS Dalol Partners with Ongoing and Kunneba AFAR Berahile 27 Completed activities Tigray VSF-G, FAO, Aba 'Ala Zone 2 PARD Abergele 6 19 1 1 20 Erebti Bidu NNGO INGO GOV UN DON Wag Megale Teru C_Gondar Zequala Sekota Hamra Yalo Afar Gonder Elidar Zuria Zone 4 Dubti N_Wello Awra Ewa Zone 1 Wadla Amhara Chifra Asayita OROMIA Adaa'r CACH, CST, GOAL, SOS Sahel, Telalak Zone 3 AMHARA Dewe (Gabi WVI, SCI, DCA, ICRC, SOSVE, Beneshangul Dalifage Rasu) LWF, MoA, AAH, CRS, LWF, MoA, AAH, ERCS, Gumu Zone 5 DCA Haro PIE, HCS, CA,HCS, CARE Arguba Limu Dire Chinaksen Special Gursum E_Wellega Dulecha Dawa Goro (Oromia) Sofi Guto Muti Fafan Fedis Gida Addis E_Hararge Harshin Midhaga Babile Tola Ababa (Oromia) Bilcil-bur Daror Yocale Jarar Fik Goljano Ziway Gashamo Tiro Lege Degehabur Dugda Erer Aware Gambela Kersa Afeta Arsi Hida Dig Galhamur (Jimma) Jimma Gunagado Bale Lagahida Nogob Shashemene Seweyna Garbo Doolo Legend Zuria West Goro Somali (Bale) Hararey Lasdhankayre Arsi Rayitu East Imi Region_Bounday Elwayne Danan Zala Abaya West Imi Bore Gura Korahe Daramalo Bule Oromia Aba-korow Berocano Gamo Damole Elale Debeweyin Gedeo Goro Elkare/Serer Zone_Boundary SNNPR Gofa Uraga Adola Godey Kemba Baqaqsa City Male Kercha Wadera SOMALI Bena Aga Wayu Gora Adadle W_Guji Charati/Weyib Hargele Kelafo No_Partners Tsemay Dola Filtu Ferfer IRE, VSF-S, ICRC, Dugda Guji Liben Deka Afder Shabelle Mustahil South Gomole Dawa ERCS, OXFAM, NRC, 1 Gumi suftu Liban Kohle/Qoxle Omo Elwaya Yabelo Arero Idalo God-god Dasenech FAO, SOSCVE Hudet Barey (Kuraz) Wachile 2 Borena Dubluk Dolobay SNNPR Dhas Dolo Odo Dilo Daawa 3 - 4 CST, WVI, SCI Dire Moyale Moyale (Somali) Miyo (Oromia) MCMDO, MoA, Qada GOV_PP CA, FAO, PiN Duma Creation date: 20th November 2019 Sources: Response target figures and funding data were colleceted and acompiled from the information submitted by Agriculture Sector partners as of 31 October 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Amhara Afar Oromia Somali Snnpr
    ETHIOPIA: AGRICULTURE SECTOR HRP PARTNERS OPERATIONAL PRESENCE - July 2019 LIVESTOCK INTERVENTION TOTAL PARTNERS AND DONORS Partners with Planned, Ongoing and AFAR Kunneba Completed activities VSF-G, FAO, 11 Tigray Berahile Zone 2 APARD Aba 'Ala 1 9 0 1 6 NNGO INGO GOV UN DON Erebti Bidu Teru Megale Yalo Elidar Zone 4 N_Wello Zone 1 Wadla Bale OROMIA Amhara Chifra Adaa'r Afar CACH, CST, GOAL, WVI Telalak Dewe AMHARA Beneshangul Dalifage Gumu Zone 5 LWF Dire Dawa Addis Ababa Daror Bilcil-bur Jarar Gashamo Degehabur Aware Gambela Galhamur Legend Gunagado Doolo Regional Boundary Oromia Zone Boundary Somali SNNPR Kercha Shabelle SOMALI Partners at Woreda Level Bule South Guji Hora Charati/Weyib Hargele Kelafo IRE, VSF-S, OXFAM Omo Yabelo Gumi Deka Ferfer 1 Arero Afder Gomole suftu Liban Elwaya Idalo Dasenech Yabelo Hudet Barey 2 (Kuraz) Borena Wachile SNNPR Dilo Dire Daawa 3 CST Government Creation date: 20th July 2019 Sources: Response target figures and funding data were colleceted and acompiled from the information submitted by Agriculture Sector partners as of 30 June 2019. Feedback: Espico Iga (Denis) & Hudad Ibrahima, Information Management Officers: [email protected]; [email protected] / Margarita Barcena, Sector Coordinator: [email protected] / https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ethiopia/agriculture-livestock Region Zones Woreda Organiza�on Implemen�ng Partner Donor Type of Ac�vity Afar Awsi_Rasu_One Adaa'r VSF-G EU/FAO Animal_health_support Afar Awsi_Rasu_One Adaa'r VSF-G OCHA EHF Animal_feed_provision
    [Show full text]
  • Local History of Ethiopia
    Local History of Ethiopia Gof - Gomu © Bernhard Lindahl (2005) HBL27 Gof (hill) 1322/1636 m, cf El Gof, Goff 03/39 [WO] JBS59 Gof 05°01'/43°19' 435 m 05/43 [n] HED99 Gof Gof 11°45'/38°23' 2994 m 11/38 [n] gofa (O) 1. chat plant, Catha edulis; 2. bad Gofa, Goffa, a sub-division of the main ethnic group Ometo (West Sidama, related to the Welayita) according to the 1994 census numbering about 241,530 of which one third Christians HBL27 Gofa 03°52'/39°04' 1109 m 03/39 [n] HCC75 Gofa 06°04'/37°04' 1229 m 06/37 [n] HCC80c Gofa (mission station about 3 km from Bulki) 06/37 [x] 1935?: "Gofa Peak still towered hundreds of feet above us but we had to climb no more. - - We dropped down the little green slope to the Andersons' thatch-roofed house. They had been alone for three months and they welcomed us joyfully. -- The station was like a saucer with one broken side. Three buildings - two homes and a clinic - were set in the sides of the saucer, halfway up. Clumps of high, flowering thorn trees were scattered around and up the far side. The broken side represented a ravine -- Strung along the edge of the saucer above our homes were the huts of our neighbors, half hidden by the broad leaves of the bananalike stalks surrounding them. -- Enid looked around and up but she kept walking toward the door, a sheet of corrugated iron nailed to a wooden frame." "Now Enid and I were moving into a house built by Walter Ohman and Laurie Davidson.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Bovine Mastitis Under Different Management in Pastoral and Agro-Pastoral Areas of Borana Zone, Southern Ethiopia
    Open Access Journal of Veterinary Science & Research ISSN: 2474-9222 MEDWIN PUBLISHERS Committed to Create Value for researchers Study on Bovine Mastitis under Different Management in Pastoral and Agro-Pastoral Areas of Borana Zone, Southern Ethiopia Kumbe A*, Bekele B, Hussien B, Onate A and Teshome D Research Article Institute of Oromia Agricultural Research, Yabello Pastoral and Dry land Agriculture Research Volume 5 Issue 1 Center, Ethiopia Received Date: December 29, 2019 Published Date: March 04, 2020 *Corresponding author: Adem Kumbe, Institute of Oromia Agricultural Research, Yabello DOI: 10.23880/oajvsr-16000192 Pastoral and Dry land Agriculture Research Center, P.O. Box 85, Yabello, Ethiopia, Email: [email protected] Abstract A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the prevalence of bovine mastitis, associated potential risk factors and major etiological agents of clinical and sub clinical mastitis under different management condition of pastoral, agro-pastoral, ranch and farm by using California mastitis test and bacteriology. A total of 384 lactating Borana cows in Did-tuyura ranch, Yabello Pastoral and dryland agriculture research center (YPDARC) dairy farm and three districts namely Gomole, Moyale and Yabello of Borana zone were included in the study. The study revealed that overall prevalence of mastitis were 47.4 % (182/384); out of which 12 % (46/384) clinical and 35.4 % (136/384) sub-clinical mastitis whereas prevalence at quarter level was 21.48% (330/1536) of which 3% (46/1536) and 18.48% (284/1536) were clinical and sub-clinical form respectively. From the total examined quarter, 3.5% (53) of quarters had blind quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Access Snapshot - Guji Zone (Oromia Region) As of 30 June 2020
    Ethiopia Access Snapshot - Guji zone (Oromia region) As of 30 June 2020 The humanitarian situation in Guji zone continues The aid community in Ethiopia has called for a cessation to deteriorate due to the compounded effects of of violence to allow for full resumption of humanitarian BonaSNNP Zuria WEST ARSI multiple crises, in particular ongoing security S N N P SIDAMA operations especially in light of COVID-19 pandemic and Hulla WEST ETHIOPIAMena (Bale) Chirone operations by security forces against Unidenti- Dara ChabeSIDAMA Gambeltu ARSI remain concerned by the continued violations of human Bore fied Armed Groups (UAGs) and the triple threat of Bore rights by all parties to the conflict. Bore Aroresa Harena Buluk COVID-19, floods, and desert locust. The nature of Bule Afele Kola GEDEO Afele Kola BALE The humanitarian response has been hampered by the conflict is continuously evolving particularly in Gumi Eldelo Ana Sora Hokko Haro Ana Sora insecurity as well as COVID-19. Despite these, authori- and Liban woredas, prompting the confinement of entire commu- HaroWalabu Walabu Girja BALE Solomo Girja (Harenfema) ties dispatched food to 69,400 IDPs. However, 11,400 nities and internally displaced persons (IDPs), loss of lives and O R O M I A UragaUraga Adola Meda Welabu IDPs have not received food assistance since October livelihoods. Reports indicate continued displacements as a result Adola OROMIA 2019(5,000 in Saba Boru, 3,200 in Goro Dola, 1,900 in of security operations. In June, near 800 people were displaced Hambela Adola Town Wadera Wamena Wadera Agawayu, 1,300 in Liban).
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Camel Mastitis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Isolation of Major Bacterial Pathogens in Gomole District of Borena Zone, Southern Ethiopia
    Hindawi Veterinary Medicine International Volume 2021, Article ID 9993571, 11 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9993571 Research Article Camel Mastitis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Isolation of Major Bacterial Pathogens in Gomole District of Borena Zone, Southern Ethiopia Minda Asfaw Geresu ,1 Shubisa Abera Leliso ,2 and Galma Wako Liben3 1Department of Veterinary Science, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia 2National Animal Health Diagnostics and Investigation Center (NAHDIC), Sebeta, Ethiopia 3Gomole District Pastoral Office, Borena Zone, Ethiopia Correspondence should be addressed to Minda Asfaw Geresu; [email protected] Received 22 March 2021; Revised 19 July 2021; Accepted 16 August 2021; Published 31 August 2021 Academic Editor: Antonio Ortega-Pacheco Copyright © 2021 Minda Asfaw Geresu et al. *is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. As of other dairy animals, dromedary camel could be affected by mastitis, a complex disease occurring worldwide among dairy animals, with heavy economic losses largely due to clinical and subclinical mastitis. Yet, little is known about the occurrence and potential risk factors exposing to lactating camel mastitis in Ethiopia. Consequently, a cross-sectional study was carried out from November 2018 to April 2019 so as to determine the prevalence, associated risk factors, and major bacterial pathogens causing mastitis in traditionally managed lactating camels in Gomole district of Borena Zone. Consequently, 348 lactating camels were examined for clinical and subclinical mastitis, using California Mastitis Test (CMT). *e overall prevalence of mastitis was 22.4% (78/ 348), including clinical 4.3% (15/348) and subclinical 18.1% (63/348) cases, respectively, whereas the quarter level prevalence of mastitis was 16.6% (232/1,392).
    [Show full text]
  • Project Implementation Manual Final Draft
    THE NATIONAL REGIONAL GOVERNMENT OF OROMIA OROMIA ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHNAGE AUTHORITY Oromia National Regional State Forested Landscape Program (Project ID P156475) Project Implementation Manual Final Draft (2017-2022) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia April 25, 2017 i Abbreviations and Acronyms A/R Afforestation/Reforestation AD Activity Data AF Additional Finance AGP Agricultural Growth Program AWP&B Annual Work Plan and Budget BioCF BioCarbon Fund BMERP Bale Mountains Eco-region REDD+ Project BoANR Bureau of Agriculture and Natural Resource BoFEC Bureaus of Finance and Economic Cooperation BoLFD Bureau of Livetsock and Fishery Development BoRLAU Bureau of Rural Land Adminsitration and Use BoWME Bureau of Water, Minerals and Energy BSM Benefit Sharing Mechanism CBO Community Based Organization CPO Cooperative Promotion Office CQS Selection Based Consultants’ Qualifications CRGE Climate Resilient Green Economy DA Development Agent EIO Ethiopian Institute of Ombudsman EMA Ethiopian Mapping Agency ER Emissions Reductions ERPA Emissions Reductions Purchase Agreement ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework FA Force Account FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FREL Forest Reference Emission Level FRL Forest Reference Level GHG Greenhouse GIS Geographic Information System GoE Government of Ethiopia GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism ii GTP Growth and Transformation Plan IBRD International Bank of Reconstruction and Development ICB International Competitive Bidding ICS Improved Cook Stoves IDA International Development
    [Show full text]
  • THE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of ETHIOPIA MINISTRY of AGRICULTURE (Moa)
    Public Disclosure Authorized THE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE (MoA) Public Disclosure Authorized Ethiopia Emergency Locust Response Project (EELRP) Integrated Pest Management Plan (IPMP) Public Disclosure Authorized October 2020 ADDIS ABABA Public Disclosure Authorized Acronyms BoA Bureau of Agriculture Das Development Agents DL Desert Locust DLC Desert Locust Control DLCO-EA Desert Locust Control Office- East Africa EELRP Ethiopia Emergency Locust Response Project EFCCC Environment Forest and Climate Change Commission EHSGs Environment, Health and Safety Guidelines EMPRES Emergency Prevention System for Transboundary Animal and Plant EMPRES Transboundary Animal and Plant Pests and Diseases ESF Environmental and Social Framework of the WB ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESSs Environmental and Social Standards GAP Good Agricultural Practice GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism IPM Integrated Pest Management IPMP Integrated Pest Management Plan MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoH Ministry of Health MoLSA Ministry of Labour and Social Affair PIM Project Implementation Manual PMP Pest Management Plan SA Social Assessment SEP Stakeholders Engagement Plan UN FAO United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization WB The World Bank 1 Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Pmr Jan-Jun 2017.Pdf (English)
    Periodic Monitoring Report DRMTechnical Working 2017 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group Covering 1 Jan to 30 Jun 2017 Prepared by Clusters and NDRMC Introduction While Ethiopia continues to battle residual needs from the 2015-2016 El Niño-induced drought, eastern and southern Ethiopia are in the grip of a new drought, which is the result of failed 2016 spring1 and autumn rains exacerbated by weak 2017 spring rains. The Government of Ethiopia and humanitarian partners issued a joint 2017 Humanitarian Requirements Document (HRD) in January 2017 requesting US$948.6 million for food and non-food assistance. In addition to 5.6 million people requiring emergency food assistance, 2.2 million people were included during March as late frosts reduced harvests in some spring rain receiving areas. In addition, some 2.7 million children and pregnant and lactating mothers with moderate acute malnutrition were identified for supplementary feeding (TSF), some 9.2 million people for WaSH support and some 1.9 million households were targeted for livestock support. The Government and partners also estimated that 303,000 children would become severely acutely malnourished and some 2 million school children would require support in school feeding and school WaSH during the year. However, Ethiopia’s humanitarian context is quickly changing and the gravity of the situation today has already surpassed the needs identified in the 2017 HRD. A further increase in need is expected in the coming months given the poor performance of the spring rains in lowland southern and eastern areas – the third consecutive weak or failed rains in these areas.
    [Show full text]