INTRODUCTION 1. I Refer to Both the 'National State' and the 'Nation-State' Simply As the 'Nation-State'. Strictly S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INTRODUCTION 1. I Refer to Both the 'National State' and the 'Nation-State' Simply As the 'Nation-State'. Strictly S Notes INTRODUCTION 1. I refer to both the ‘national state’ and the ‘nation-state’ simply as the ‘nation-state’. Strictly speaking, the state is a ‘national state’ when its centralized, autonomous and differentiated structures uphold legitimate authority within a boundary which contains multiple regions. However, a nation-state exists only where the citizenry share a common code of national identity expressed in language, religion, myth and custom. The majority of modern European states are quintessentially national states, while only a small minority, ostensibly the Republic of Ireland and Sweden, could satisfactorily qualify as nation-states (Tilly, 1990, pp. 2–3). 2. A proliferation of smaller parties emerged to stand, with modest suc- cess, in the 1996 election to the Northern Ireland Forum. These par- ties recorded the following percentage share of the vote in this election: the UK Unionist Party (UKU), 3.69 per cent; the Progressive Unionist Party (PUP), 3.47 per cent; the Ulster Democratic Party (UDP), 2.22 per cent; the Women’s Coalition, 1.03 per cent; and, Labour, 0.85 per cent (Irish Times, 1 June 1996). It is appreciated that the fringe parties represent distinct positions in the spectrum of Northern Ireland poli- tics. However, limited space prevents a detailed consideration of these positions. 3. In the 1994 election to the European Parliament the percentage of the vote secured by these five main political parties in Northern Ire- land was as follows: DUP, 29.15 per cent; UUP, 23.83 per cent; APNI, 4.13 per cent; SDLP, 28.93 per cent; Sinn Féin, 9.86 per cent – giving a combined total of 95.9 per cent. In the 1997 Westminster General Election, the percentage of the vote secured by the five main political parties in Northern Ireland was as follows: DUP, 13.6 per cent; UUP, 32.7 per cent; APNI, 8 per cent; SDLP, 24.1 per cent; Sinn Féin, 16.1 per cent – giving a combined total of 94.5 per cent. 4. The use of words to signify communal allegiance in Northern Ireland is a subtle art form. Referring to Northern Ireland as either ‘Northern Ireland’, ‘Ulster’, ‘the North of Ireland’, or ‘the occupied six counties’ can convey communal allegiance. The use of terms in this book are not intended as a personal expression of communal allegiance. How- ever, I am aware that the use of some words for technical reasons, for example ‘sub-state’ (to denote the federal nature of Northern Ireland between 1921 and 1972), may be interpreted in some quarters as being politically motivated. 207 208 Notes 1 A POSTMODERNIST APPROACH TO COMMUNAL IDENTITIES IN NORTHERN IRELAND? 1. Agreement between the governments of the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom on the content of the Downing Street Declara- tion (1993) only came after at least 18 drafts had been circulated be- tween officials and ministers of the two governments (Aughey and Morrow, 1996, p. 213). 2. Despite the Commission’s wide-ranging consultation, Garvin notes an under-representation of voices from ‘hardline east Belfast and Border unionists on the one hand, and hardline nationalists from west Belfast on the other’ in the report (Garvin, 1994, p. 123). 3. A subsequent forum called ‘Democratic Dialogue’ has attempted to emmulate the Commission’s achievements in inducing communal self- reflexivity in Northern Ireland. To this end, it holds conferences and publishes reports on a variety of issues related to the Northern Ireland conflict (Democratic Dialogue, 1995; 1996). 2 INTERPRETING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATION, IRISH NATIONALISM AND ULSTER UNIONISM 1. As evidence of this, Unionists have cited what they referred to as the Republic of Ireland’s ‘illegal, immoral and criminal’ constitutional claim on Northern Ireland in Articles 2 and 3 of Bunreacht Na hÉireann/ Constitution of Ireland (Dr Ian Paisley in the Belfast Telegraph, 3 July 1996) and the violent campaigns of militant republican groups. 2. John Armstrong is another leading exponent of contextualizing the devel- opment of nations within the range of ethnicity. For Armstrong, the devel- opment of nations should be seen in terms of the longue durée whereby the seeds of ethnic identity, such as symbols and myths of descent, are continually revitalized and reinterpreted in a changing communal identity (Armstrong, 1982, pp. 4–11). Historians such as Hugh Seton-Watson and Suzan Reynolds offer their own contributions to the ethnicist approach. Seton-Watson distinguishes between ‘old’ and ‘new’ nations: ‘The old are those which had acquired national identity or national consciousness before the formation of the doctrine of nationalism. The new are those for whom two processes developed simultaneously: the formation of national con- sciousness and the creation of national movements’ (Seton-Watson, 1977, p. 6). Suzan Reynolds draws parallels between the features of customs, laws, and myths found in medieval kingdoms in Western Europe and those same features found in modern nations (Reynolds, 1984, pp. 251–6). 3. As well as reformation Protestantism, the settlers brought with them entrepreneurial and industrial skills that corresponded to modern re- quirements and made Belfast the industrial centre of the island (Ruane and Todd, 1996, p. 27). 4. Joyce had already left Ireland before beginning work on Ulysses. Anderson’s concept of ‘imagining’ (and re-imagining) communal ident- ity would, therefore, have been especially poignant in his case. Notes 209 5. Hobsbawm defines this invention of tradition as: ‘a set of practices, normally governed by overtly or tacitly accepted rules and of a ritual or symbolic nature, which seek to inculcate certain values and norms of behaviour by repetition, which automatically implies continuity with the past’ (Hobsbawm, 1983, p. 1). 6. The nationalism of O’Connell focused on Catholic emancipation and the establishment of an Irish parliament ruled by the Catholic majority (Hutchinson, 1994, p. 58). 7. The Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) is the largest ‘nationalist’ party in Northern Ireland. 8. By John Hume, SDLP, Leader, (Hume, 1996, pp. 118–33); and by Mark Durkan, SDLP, Chairperson (1990–5) and Denis Haughey, SDLP rep- resentative in the EU Committee of the Regions, in the dialogues. 3 THE GOVERNANCE OF NORTHERN IRELAND: FROM MODERNITY TO POSTMODERNITY? 1. The Irish Free State government became the ‘Government of the Re- public of Ireland’ after the Government of Ireland Act, 1948. 2. These features are normally associated with the modern state in West- ern democratic society. 3. The Unionist communal truth continues to repudiate the commonly held perception of widespread discrimination against Catholics during this period. 4. While he was Tánaiste in 1947, Seán Lemass began to consider aloud the idea of a European Customs Union despite the prevailing protec- tionist ethos of the Irish Free State (Bew and Patterson, 1982, pp. 34–6). This fledgling step signalled the beginning of an extraterritorial context for the economic resource of the Irish Nationalist identity (Bew, 1994, p. 159). 5. Theoretically, non-consociational options for a modern state structure for Northern Ireland include: Assimilation into the UK; assimilation into the Republic of Ireland; joint authority; a UK federation/confed- eration; Irish federation/confederation; repartition of the island; inde- pendence; and majority-rule devolution. Each option would appear to suffer from serious drawbacks when theoretically applied to the politi- cal context of Northern Ireland (see McGarry and O’Leary, 1990, for details). 6. A co-signatory of the AIA with Mrs Margaret Thatcher. 7. Although Mrs Thatcher was initially frustrated by the level of security co-operation secured by the AIA (Bew, Gibbon, Patterson, 1995, p. 214). 8. Where the gains made by one community are perceived by the other to have been made at its expense. 9. The right to national self-determination is ‘understood as the right of . members of a nation to preserve their distinct essence, and man- age communal life in accordance with their particular way of life’ (Tamir, 1993, p. 69). 210 Notes 4 INTIMATIONS OF POSTMODERNITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 1. DG-16, which is responsible for the regional fund, has a staff of 500 managers and field officers (Marks, 1993, p. 397). 2. It must be remembered that representatives coming from nation-states with a strong regional structure, such as Germany and Belgium, al- ready have much more power than MEPs. 5 THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE RESOURCES OF COMMUNAL IDENTITIES IN NORTHERN IRELAND 1. The Special Support Programme for Peace and Reconciliation was announced in December 1994 from the EU budget for cross-border initiatives. 2. As well as the formation of other regional élites based on policy ar- eas creating maritime, underdeveloped or agricultural regions (Finan- cial Times, 6 September 1995). 3. Such as Lisnaskea and Clones Enterprise Development and the Strabane- Lifford Development Commission. 4. With the help of their Conservative allies at Westminster and the abstentionist policy of Sinn Féin. 5. Reaffirmed by David Trimble (UUP, Leader) in the Financial Times, 11 September 1995. However, this aspiration appears to have been ditched in the aftermath of devolution for Scotland and Wales. 6. James Anderson and James Goodman have criticized the unionist econ- omist Graham Gudgin of the Cadogan Group for citing British subvention as a ‘trump card’ against a ‘united Ireland’. They argue that this precarious reliance on the British taxpayer, as well as the peripheral location of the island in the EU, actually necessitates the development of economic strategies that includes the creation of North- South institutions (in Fortnight, no. 350, May 1996). 7. For Unionists, the preoccupation of Prime Minister Edward Heath with the accession of the UK to the EEC in 1972 was responsible for an ill-considered decision to prorogue the Stormont Assembly in that year.
Recommended publications
  • John F. Morrison Phd Thesis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository 'THE AFFIRMATION OF BEHAN?' AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE POLITICISATION PROCESS OF THE PROVISIONAL IRISH REPUBLICAN MOVEMENT THROUGH AN ORGANISATIONAL ANALYSIS OF SPLITS FROM 1969 TO 1997 John F. Morrison A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2010 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3158 This item is protected by original copyright ‘The Affirmation of Behan?’ An Understanding of the Politicisation Process of the Provisional Irish Republican Movement Through an Organisational Analysis of Splits from 1969 to 1997. John F. Morrison School of International Relations Ph.D. 2010 SUBMISSION OF PHD AND MPHIL THESES REQUIRED DECLARATIONS 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, John F. Morrison, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 82,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2005 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph.D. in May, 2007; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2005 and 2010. Date 25-Aug-10 Signature of candidate 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminological Policy Mobilities and Sex Work: Understanding the Movement of the ‘Swedish Model’ to Northern Ireland
    Northumbria Research Link Citation: McMenzie, Laura, Cook, Ian and Laing, Mary (2019) Criminological policy mobilities and sex work: Understanding the movement of the ‘Swedish model’ to Northern Ireland. British Journal of Criminology, 59 (5). pp. 1199-1216. ISSN 0007-0955 Published by: Oxford University Press URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy058 <https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy058> This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/36688/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/pol i cies.html This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies. To read and/or cite from the published version of the research, please visit the publisher’s website (a subscription may be required.) doi:10.1093/bjc/azy058 BRIT.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland and South Africa: "Hope and History at a Crossroads" Padraig O'malley University of Massachusetts Boston, [email protected]
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston John M. McCormack Graduate School of Policy and McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Global Studies Publications Studies 3-2000 Northern Ireland and South Africa: "Hope and History at a Crossroads" Padraig O'Malley University of Massachusetts Boston, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/mccormack_pubs Part of the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation O'Malley, Padraig, "Northern Ireland and South Africa: "Hope and History at a Crossroads"" (2000). John M. McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies Publications. Paper 27. http://scholarworks.umb.edu/mccormack_pubs/27 This Occasional Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in John M. McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. .The John W McCormack Institute of Public Affairs Northern Ireland and South Africa: "Hope and History at a Crossroads" - •••••••••••••••••••• ) 'by Padraig O'Malley - . March2000 Northern Ireland and South Africa: "Hope and History at a Crossroads" by Padraig O'Malley March 2000 Northern Ireland and South Africa: "Hope and History at a Crossroads" Padraig O'Malley Your truth that lacks the warmth of lies, the ability to compromise. John Hewitt Whenever things threatened to fall apart during our negotiations - and they did on many occasions - we would stand back and remind ourselves that if negotiations broke down the outcome would be a blood bath of unimaginable proportions, and that after the blood bath we would have to sit down again and negotiate with each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Government Institutions in Northern Ireland—Strand One Negotiations
    BUILDING GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS IN NORTHERN IRELAND —STRAND ONE NEGOTIATIONS Deaglán de Bréadún —IMPLEMENTING STRAND ONE Steven King IBIS working paper no. 11 BUILDING GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS IN NORTHERN IRELAND —STRAND ONE NEGOTIATIONS Deaglán de Bréadún —IMPLEMENTING STRAND ONE Steven King No. 1 in the lecture series “Institution building and the peace process: the challenge of implementation” organised in association with the Conference of University Rectors in Ireland Working Papers in British-Irish Studies No. 11, 2001 Institute for British-Irish Studies University College Dublin Working Papers in British-Irish Studies No. 11, 2001 © the authors, 2001 ISSN 1649-0304 ABSTRACTS BUILDING GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS IN NORTHERN IRELAND —STRAND ONE NEGOTIATIONS The Good Friday Agreement was the culmination of almost two years of multi-party negotiations designed to resolve difficult relationships between the two main com- munities within Northern Ireland, between North and South and between Ireland and Great Britain. The three-stranded approach had already been in use for some time as a format for discussion. The multi-party negotiations in 1997-98 secured Sinn Féin’s reluctant acceptance of a Northern Ireland Assembly, which the party had earlier rejected, as a quid pro quo for significant North-South bodies. Despite the traditional nationalist and republican slogan of “No return to Stormont”, in the negotiations the nationalists needed as much devolution of power as possible if their ministers were to meet counterparts from the Republic on more or less equal terms on the proposed North-South Ministerial Council. Notwithstanding historic tensions between constitutional nationalists and republicans, the SDLP’s success in negotiating a cabinet-style executive, rather than the loose committee structure favoured by unionists, helped ensure there would be a substantial North-South Min- isterial Council, as sought by both wings of nationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of POSTERS Page 1 of 30
    LIST OF POSTERS Page 1 of 30 A hot August night’ feauturing Brush Shiels ‘Oh no, not Drumcree again!’ ‘Sinn Féin women demand their place at Irish peace talks’ ‘We will not be kept down easy, we will not be still’ ‘Why won’t you let my daddy come home?’ 100 years of Trade Unionism - what gains for the working class? 100th anniversary of Eleanor Marx in Derry 11th annual hunger strike commemoration 15 festival de cinema 15th anniversary of hunger strike 15th anniversary of the great Long Kesh escape 1690. Educate not celebrate 1969 - Nationalist rights did not exist 1969, RUC help Orange mob rule 1970s Falls Curfew, March and Rally 1980 Hunger Strike anniversary talk 1980 Hunger-Strikers, 1990 political hostages 1981 - 1991, H-block martyrs 1981 H-block hunger-strike 1981 hunger strikes, 1991 political hostages 1995 Green Ink Irish Book Fair 1996 - the Nationalist nightmare continues 20 years of death squads. Disband the murderers 200,000 votes for Sinn Féin is a mandate 21st annual volunteer Tom Smith commemoration 22 years in English jails 25 years - time to go! Ireland - a bright new dawn of hope and peace 25 years too long 25th anniversary of internment dividedsociety.org LIST OF POSTERS Page 2 of 30 25th anniversary of the introduction of British troops 27th anniversary of internment march and rally 5 reasons to ban plastic bullets 5 years for possessing a poster 50th anniversary - Vol. Tom Williams 6 Chontae 6 Counties = Orange state 75th anniversary of Easter Rising 75th anniversary of the first Dáil Éireann A guide to Irish history
    [Show full text]
  • Leverhulme-Funded Monitoring Programme
    Leverhulme-funded monitoring programme Northern Ireland report 5 November 2000 Contents Summary Robin Wilson 3 Storm clouds gather Robin Wilson 4 Devolved government Robin Wilson Liz Fawcett 10 The assembly Rick Wilford 17 The media Greg McLaughlin 28 Public attitudes and identity (Nil return) Intergovernmental relations John Coakley Graham Walker 32 Relations with the EU Elizabeth Meehan 43 Relations with local government (Nil return) Finance Robin Wilson 47 Devolution disputes (Nil return) Political parties and elections Duncan Morrow Rick Wilford 49 Public policies Duncan Morrow 55 2 Summary It was the best, but also the worst, of times in Northern Ireland during this quarter. The four-party executive finally agreed in October what it would substantively do after 30 months of high- (or, perhaps, low-) political manoeuvring between the ethno- nationalist protagonists. Here, at last, was a draft Programme for Government. One, indeed, with a confidence-building message of ‘making a difference’; one, too, with some ‘joined-up’ sophistication and the capacity thus to cement the partisan ministerial fiefdoms. Here, also, was a draft budget, for the first time reflecting regional priorities. Meanwhile, there was patient work in the assembly—if criticism of its lack of transparency—and the Civic Forum met. But a poll showed confidence in the agreement falling—sharply amongst Catholics, to rock-bottom amongst Protestants. And the institutions of the agreement—their interdependence meaning shocks destabilise the whole baroque architecture—came under increasing strain. The failure of the policing commission to generate a consensual report led to a Police Bill both unionists and nationalists opposed. Ethnic hurt mobilised (or, perhaps, exploited) in the Protestant community over the loss of the Royal Ulster Constabulary name (symbolising its 302 victims) struck a body-blow to David Trimble as Ulster Unionist Party leader and first minister, as the Democratic Unionists—undermining the executive by their absence—won a hitherto safe UUP seat.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties in the Northern Ireland Assembly – the Ulster Unionist Party KEY
    Political Parties in the Northern Ireland Assembly – The Ulster Unionist Party KEY: SO: Sandra Overend SO: I'm Sandra Overend, I am a member of the Ulster Unionist Party, and I represent the constituency of Mid Ulster. What does your Party stand for? Well, the Ulster Unionist Party is a Party of the Union. We believe in… that Northern Ireland is an integral part of the United Kingdom. We're a Party of law and order. And we're very proud of the history of the Ulster Unionist Party and the integral part that, the leading role, that it played in bringing forward the Peace Process back in 1998. How has your Party changed in the last 20 years? Well, Northern Ireland has changed a lot over the past 20 years. And the Party internally has changed a lot. And we have a new generation of elected representatives now. But our principles remain the same, and that Northern Ireland remains a part of the United Kingdom. We want Northern Ireland to flourish. Do you think the Assembly and Executive are effective? The current Assembly and Executive is really very dysfunctional. Back in ‘98, whenever we … we've helped to bring forward the Belfast Agreement..it was built in a certain way to build trust. And, unfortunately, I don't think that trust has been built. And the current dysfunctionality of the Assembly and how Welfare Reform threatens the future of this place, it really isn't where we wanted to see the Assembly to go. What challenges face your Party moving forward? We're moving forward, but we also face the challenges of increasing female representation and getting young people involved in politics.
    [Show full text]
  • William Guillermo Morales Free in Cuba!
    THE INSURGENT Newsletter of the Committee to Fight Repression Vol. 4 No.2 Summer 1988 William Guillermo Morales Free in Cuba! In This Issue: Lexington HSU Ruled Unconstitutional by Federal Judge 7 Anti-Imperialists Indicted in Washington, D.C. Communique from Puerto Rico Mutulu Shakur & Marilyn Buck Convicted· THE INSURGENT 2 Table of Contents Anti-imperialists Indicte~ • 2 Victory in Lexington lawsuit 9 On page 10 there appears a drawing sent to Puerto Rican patriot jailed • • • • II us by Laurie Kilgore, a prisoner at the Communique • . • • • • • •• •••• .13 Maine Correctional Center. The drawing ac­ Mutulu Shakurand Marilyn Buck. • . • .14 companied a beautiful letter about our In­ Dhoruba fights COIN.TELPRO ·15 ternational Women's Day issue. We want to IRA freedom fighter • . • • 16 thank Laurie for her appreciation, and for Pat Gros-Levasseur free on bail 18 her contribution to The lnsurgent. Fight for Mexican- land :. -: •.. .•• . • l~ Committee to Fight Repression: Who We Are The Committee to Fight Repression is an ting out the Insurgent. We believe that sup­ anti-imperialist organization that analyzes, port for political prisoners and pOW's -­ exposes, and confronts political repre~sion. from the national liberation movements, the We believe that in order to build effective northamerican anti-imperialist movement, resistance movements we need to understand the Plowshares, Sanctuary and peace move­ the u.s. imperialist state and the dialectic ments -- is a critical aspect of all current between REPRESSION and RESISTANCE. _ People. activities for human rights and social jus­ don't automatically resist government tice in this country. repression. We need to learn what we're up against and learn how to resist--from each The over 100 political/social activists and other and from movements allover the world revolutionaries in u.s.
    [Show full text]
  • A Democratic Design? the Political Style of the Northern Ireland Assembly
    A Democratic Design? The political style of the Northern Ireland Assembly Rick Wilford Robin Wilson May 2001 FOREWORD....................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................4 Background.........................................................................................................................................7 Representing the People.....................................................................................................................9 Table 1 Parties Elected to the Assembly ........................................................................................10 Public communication......................................................................................................................15 Table 2 Written and Oral Questions 7 February 2000-12 March 2001*........................................17 Assembly committees .......................................................................................................................20 Table 3 Statutory Committee Meetings..........................................................................................21 Table 4 Standing Committee Meetings ..........................................................................................22 Access to information.......................................................................................................................26 Table 5 Assembly Staffing
    [Show full text]
  • Record Sdlp Annual Conference Ps
    l!.I 'tvhf 'I~ , , ,:. (" ® PO L. ~1 i 1( i ( \. li'1. ,:;0 Tk-1\>. , \ cc : PS/Secretary of State (B and L) PAB/1861/DE PS/r1inisters (B) PS/PUS (B an9-L) PS/l'lr ,Bel 1 t./' l"lr Blelloch Mr Marshall (L) l'1r Wyatt I'lr Angel (L) Mr Blatherwick Mr Chesterton (L) Miss MacGlashan Mr .Harringt on (L) l'1r I Orr (Dublin) NOTE FOR Th~ RECORD SDLP ANNUAL CONFERENCE 1. The SDLP held their eleventh Annual Conference in Newcastle on 13-15 November; I attended as an observer. Although the proceedings ,,,,ere overshadowed by the shock of Robert, Bradford t s murder (""hich John. Hume, summing up .the feelings of delegates, described as !tan outright attack on the democratic process ••• &nsfl an overt attempt to provoke this community into civil conflict"), the underlying mood of the Conference was optimisti,c. There were clearly some solid grounds for this confidence: under "very unpromising circumstances the party held its ground in the Nay local elections and maintained its cohesiveness despite the severe pressures of the hunger strik~. Hembership figures were 16% up on the 1980 total (itself a record), and with one or tvlO exceptions delegates showed little inclination to pursue divisive post-mortems on the Fermanagh and South Tyrone by-elections, although some scars remain from thi s episode e (A resolution condemning the failure to field a candidate vIas rejected in private session.) Nonetheless it was evident that the part y has paid a price for survival: preoccupied with copper-fastening its support in the Catholic, community in the face of the extreme republican challenge, the SDLP now shows less sign th&~ ever of understanding the reality of the unionist uosition or in North~rn Irel~~d~ ~ the tru.e scope of the, politically POSSl.Dle; Apart lrom some cautionary words from John Hume, the party leadership did little to lessen many delegates'unrealistic expectations about the imminence of major change in the North's constitutional position iSE,3uing from the Anglo-Irish process.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Robinson DUP Reg Empey UUP Robin Newton DUP David Walter Ervine PUP Naomi Rachel Long Alliance Michael Stewart Copeland UUP
    CANDIDATES ELECTED TO THE NORTHERN IRELAND ASSEMBLY 26 NOVEMBER 2003 Belfast East: Peter Robinson DUP Reg Empey UUP Robin Newton DUP David Walter Ervine PUP Naomi Rachel Long Alliance Michael Stewart Copeland UUP Belfast North: Nigel Alexander Dodds DUP Gerry Kelly Sinn Fein Nelson McCausland DUP Fred Cobain UUP Alban Maginness SDLP Kathy Stanton Sinn Fein Belfast South: Michael McGimpsey UUP Simon Mark Peter Robinson DUP John Esmond Birnie UUP Carmel Hanna SDLP Alex Maskey Sinn Fein Alasdair McDonnell SDLP Belfast West: Gerry Adams Sinn Fein Alex Atwood SDLP Bairbre de Brún Sinn Fein Fra McCann Sinn Fein Michael Ferguson Sinn Fein Diane Dodds DUP East Antrim: Roy Beggs UUP Sammy Wilson DUP Ken Robinson UUP Sean Neeson Alliance David William Hilditch DUP Thomas George Dawson DUP East Londonderry: Gregory Campbell DUP David McClarty UUP Francis Brolly Sinn Fein George Robinson DUP Norman Hillis UUP John Dallat SDLP Fermanagh and South Tyrone: Thomas Beatty (Tom) Elliott UUP Arlene Isobel Foster DUP* Tommy Gallagher SDLP Michelle Gildernew Sinn Fein Maurice Morrow DUP Hugh Thomas O’Reilly Sinn Fein * Elected as UUP candidate, became a member of the DUP with effect from 15 January 2004 Foyle: John Mark Durkan SDLP William Hay DUP Mitchel McLaughlin Sinn Fein Mary Bradley SDLP Pat Ramsey SDLP Mary Nelis Sinn Fein Lagan Valley: Jeffrey Mark Donaldson DUP* Edwin Cecil Poots DUP Billy Bell UUP Seamus Anthony Close Alliance Patricia Lewsley SDLP Norah Jeanette Beare DUP* * Elected as UUP candidate, became a member of the DUP with effect from
    [Show full text]
  • American Irish Newsletter the Ri Ish American Community Collections
    Sacred Heart University DigitalCommons@SHU American Irish Newsletter The rI ish American Community Collections 3-1985 American Irish Newsletter - February - March 1985 American Ireland Education Foundation - PEC Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/irish_ainews Part of the European Languages and Societies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation American Ireland Education Foundation - PEC, "American Irish Newsletter - February - March 1985" (1985). American Irish Newsletter. Paper 157. http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/irish_ainews/157 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the The rI ish American Community Collections at DigitalCommons@SHU. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Irish Newsletter by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SHU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE AMERICAN IRISH NEWSLETTER The Newsletter of the Action Irish Vol. 10, No. 1 FEBRUARY/M ARCH, 1985 THE IRISH IN NEW SPAIN by Prof. John Flannery (PEC, Texas) SPECIAL ST. PATRICKS DAY Irish names crop up in the histories of the Spanish American MEMBERSHIP DRIVE colonies if for no other reason than that they were prominent Aware that the Irishness of many Americans of Irish in the history of Spain. The area known as New Spain (present- heritage will soon come to life during the upcoming St. day Mexico and the lands north and north-east, including Texas) Patrick’s Day festivities, the PEC will very shortly kick-off was no exception. a special membership drive. The target of this drive is the In 1698 the Spanish king, fearful of the loss of Florida to the once-a-year Irishmen.
    [Show full text]