Can Microsoft Logic Apps Re- Place Microsoft Biztalk?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Can Microsoft Logic Apps Re- Place Microsoft Biztalk? Linköping University | Department of Computer Science Bachelor thesis, 16 ECTS | Datateknik 2017 | LIU-IDA/LITH-EX-G--17/082--SE Can Microsoft Logic Apps re- place Microsoft BizTalk? An evaluation of integration platforms Anton Berglund Oscar Fredriksson Supervisor : Rouhollah Mahfouzi Examiner : Ahmed Rezine Linköpings universitet SE–581 83 Linköping +46 13 28 10 00 , www.liu.se Upphovsrätt Detta dokument hålls tillgängligt på Internet – eller dess framtida ersättare – under 25 år från publiceringsdatum under förutsättning att inga extraordinära omständigheter uppstår. Tillgång till dokumentet innebär tillstånd för var och en att läsa, ladda ner, skriva ut enstaka kopior för enskilt bruk och att använda det oförändrat för ickekommersiell forskning och för undervisning. Överföring av upphovsrätten vid en senare tidpunkt kan inte upphäva detta tillstånd. All annan användning av dokumentet kräver upphovsmannens medgivande. För att garantera äktheten, säkerheten och tillgängligheten finns lösningar av teknisk och admin- istrativ art. Upphovsmannens ideella rätt innefattar rätt att bli nämnd som upphovsman i den omfattning som god sed kräver vid användning av dokumentet på ovan beskrivna sätt samt skydd mot att dokumentet ändras eller presenteras i sådan form eller i sådant sam- manhang som är kränkande för upphovsmannenslitterära eller konstnärliga anseende eller egenart. För ytterligare information om Linköping University Electronic Press se förlagets hemsida http://www.ep.liu.se/. Copyright The publishers will keep this document online on the Internet – or its possible replacement – for a period of 25 years starting from the date of publication barring exceptional circum- stances. The online availability of the document implies permanent permission for anyone to read, to download, or to print out single copies for his/hers own use and to use it unchanged for non-commercial research and educational purpose. Subsequent transfers of copyright cannot revoke this permission. All other uses of the document are conditional upon the con- sent of the copyright owner. The publisher has taken technical and administrative measures to assure authenticity, security and accessibility. According to intellectual property law the author has the right to be mentioned when his/her work is accessed as described above and to be protected against infringement. For additional information about the Linköping Uni- versity Electronic Press and its procedures for publication and for assurance of document integrity, please refer to its www home page: http://www.ep.liu.se/. c Anton Berglund Oscar Fredriksson Abstract Integration has always been an important and tricky task for IT-businesses. There are several products available for solving integration issues, one of them is the long developed platform BizTalk from Microsoft. As cloud computing has grown in recent years, Microsoft has been putting more focus towards the cloud. With their cloud, named Azure, expanding a new integration platform have been released, the iPaaS (integration Platform as a Service) Logic Apps. This report aims to evaluate the integration platforms Logic Apps and BizTalk with the purpose of finding out if the new Logic Apps can replace the long developed BizTalk. The evaluation is performed by implementing an application in both platforms, then evaluat- ing selected parameters by giving each a score to concretize our assessment on quantify whether Logic Apps can replace BizTalk. Contents Abstract iii Acknowledgments iv Contents iv List of Figures vi List of Tables 1 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Introduction . 2 1.2 Background . 2 1.3 Aim............................................ 3 1.4 Research questions . 3 1.5 Approach . 3 1.6 Thesis Structure . 3 2 Theory 4 2.1 Integration . 4 2.2 Cloud computing . 6 2.3 Azure . 8 2.4 Logic Apps . 11 2.5 BizTalk . 13 2.6 Miscellaneous . 17 3 Method 18 3.1 Choice of the parameters . 18 3.2 Defined parameters . 19 3.3 Evaluation . 20 4 Implementation 21 4.1 Message Relay Scenario . 21 4.2 Logic Apps implementation . 24 4.3 BizTalk implementation . 28 5 Evaluation and Result 33 5.1 Evaluation of parameters . 33 5.2 Evaluation rating . 41 5.3 Side Study . 44 6 Discussion and Conclusion 46 6.1 Discussion . 46 6.2 Conclusion . 48 iv Bibliography 49 List of Figures 2.1 Many to many connections . 5 2.2 One to many connections . 5 2.3 Cloud Service Models . 6 2.4 Azure Function development in Azure portal . 9 2.5 Logic Apps Components . 12 2.6 BizTalk components overview . 13 2.7 BizTalk orchestration overview . 16 4.1 Message-relay overview . 22 4.2 Message-relay operations . 22 4.3 Logic Apps Parent workflow . 25 4.4 Logic Apps Child workflow 1 . 25 4.5 Logic Apps Child workflow 2 . 26 4.6 Logic Apps Child workflow 3 . 26 4.7 Logic Apps Child workflow 4 . 27 4.8 Try-Catch scope in BizTalk . 29 5.1 Logic Apps Resubmit run . 34 5.2 Logic Apps Map to messages . 35 5.3 Logic Apps Run History . 36 5.4 Logic Apps Detailed Run History . 37 5.5 BizTalk Server map editor . 39 vi List of Tables 3.1 Rating definitions . 20 5.1 Rated exception handling parameters . 42 5.2 Rated functionality parameters . 42 5.3 Rated rest of parameters . 43 5.4 Evaluation Total rating . 43 5.5 Side Study Results . 45 1 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction In IT-businesses, the process to connect individual systems to become a larger system work- ing together is called integration. As the systems used by companies become more complex. As a result the applications developed that exchange information needs to be integrated in the system. To integrate these systems, engineers often use software called integration platforms. In recent years cloud computing has grown bigger. With cloud computing, many services has appeared, such as the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), where a user can use a software which is not installed on user machines. Using cloud services has many benefits compared to using software installed locally (on-premise). On-premise software is often more expensive and requires more configuration and maintenance which can be time consuming. As new cloud integration platforms emerge, they might be more beneficial for solving integration problems. Several companies are considering to migrate to the cloud. However, as the new cloud services are being released, it is interesting to see how these new kind of software can replace the well developed, stable, on-premise software. Or are they still too immature to be used? 1.2 Background The host company is a global corporation with around 2000 employees spread across the world. With employees developing systems on different locations, the systems need to be integrated. The company has started to migrate some of its applications and services to the cloud, where it is building a platform. The office in Linköping has around 50 employees and is mainly working with development and integration. Microsoft BizTalk is the current platform used to solve integration issues. The platform is stable, and has been developed since its release in year 2000. However, as cloud computing is growing, there may have appeared other solutions to solve integration problems. One of the solutions could be the newly released Microsoft Logic Apps which could ease the integration in terms of implementation and maintenance. 2 1.3. Aim 1.3 Aim The purpose of the study is to determine if the current platform Microsoft BizTalk is replace- able with the newly released Microsoft Logic Apps for the host company by comparing them by literature and with a scenario implemented in both platforms. 1.4 Research questions The research questions that are going to be answered are the following: • What aspects of the integration platforms are relevant for the host company? • Is Microsoft BizTalk replaceable with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps for the host com- pany? 1.5 Approach To be able to answer the research questions in this thesis, we plan to: • Read about the platforms, Logic Apps and BizTalk. • Identify the needs for the host company. • Choose relevant parameters. • Implement a scenario in both platforms. • Evaluate the platforms based on the chosen parameters. 1.6 Thesis Structure The thesis structure is as follows: Chapter 2 will contain the theory and background on the notions used in the thesis. Chap- ter 3 proposes the method with the parameter that is used to compare Logic Apps and BizTalk. Chapter 4 contains the scenario description and the implementation in Logic Apps and BizTalk. Chapter 5 contains the evaluation of the parameters described in the method as well as a side study done to test the performance of implemented applications. Chapter 6 contains a discussion and the conclusion that was drawn for this thesis. 3 2 Theory In this chapter the background of the notions that will be used in this thesis will be described. This chapter will be structured as follows. First we generally describe what system inte- gration and cloud computing is. Then we will describe the cloud service provider "Azure" and some of its services that is used in this thesis, such as the integration platform Logic Apps, Azure Function, Blob storage and Service Bus. Lastly the integration platform BizTalk is described as well as the API that is being used in the implementation in chapter 4. 2.1 Integration Integration is a process where applications or systems are connected to create a larger sys- tem. As the amount of applications and systems within the system increases, the integration solution becomes crucial. Imagine a customer calling a support-service and when the sup- port enters the customers’ information. A lookup in a database is triggered and the support personnel can immediately answer if items are in store or sold out. All these systems that trade information require a connection between each other. Now imagine an organization with over thousands of different systems that trade information with each other.
Recommended publications
  • Understand Biztalk Schema Properties
    Understand Biztalk Schema Properties Wiatt never elaborated any depurators escribing crankily, is Tabbie woodsy and incantatory enough? Which Vergil timber so bitingly that Meryl te-heeing her paletot? Terrel remains unterrifying: she power her quirts roller-skated too spectrally? We have similar to the type as vendors andanalysts, and promotes properties window that schema properties First response must comb the broom of a BizTalk application. Json schema reference another file Lapangan Kita. This tutorial explains Extending Types within an XML Schema XSD. Properties within the schema are defined and with explicit object containing their expected type. Automation azure Biztalk book Bot c cds cognitive services CosmosDB d365. Is a component that transforms pdf content to xml that biztalk understands. Often the missile for the peasant is actually available anymore the schema or is smooth easily. To ruin the metadata on image files do the sink Right-click the file and select Properties. BizTalk XML To JSON Array conversion Microsoft Azure. Chapter 4 Understanding BizTalk Messaging Services. This step important nutrient by default BizTalk does the perform schema level. Edi Xml Example. Once a BizTalk Framework schema is accepted and published the. Uses the sample JSON document to supreme a JSON schema. BizTalk Server List of Errors and Warnings Causes and. 3 Custom Properties your own promoted fields from many property schema. The though of writing a post is poison make us understand right it functions by. The Context Property specific As stated previously context properties are simply keyvalue. Appsync pipeline resolver example El Informador Digital. To fall the details of BizTalk Server it where important i understand.
    [Show full text]
  • Install and Configure Biztalk Server 2013 in a Standalone Machine
    INSTALL AND CONFIGURE BIZTALK SERVER 2013 IN A STANDALONE MACHINE Publication of http://www.biztalk360.com About the Author Writen By Sandro Pereira [Microsoft Integration MVP] Currently working as a BizTalk consultant at DevScope (www.devscope.net). In the last few years has been working implementing integration scenarios and Cloud Provisioning at a major telecommunications service provider in Portugal. His main focus is on Integration Technologies where is been using .NET, BizTalk and SOAP/XML/XSLT since 2002. He is an active member and moderator on the MSDN BizTalk Server Forums, TechNet Wiki author, Code Gallery contributor and was awarded Most Valuable Professional (MVP) for BizTalk Server by Microsoft since 2010 (https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Sandro.Pereira) ) and MCTS: BizTalk Server BizTalk Server 2006 and BizTalk Server 2010 certified. He is also author of the Blog: http://sandroaspbiztalkblog.wordpress.com/, member of the BizTalk Brazil community: http://www.biztalkbrasil.com.br/, NetPonto community (http://netponto.org/), member of BizTalk Administrators community: http://www.biztalkadminsblogging.com, editor of the magazine “Programar” (http://www.revista- programar.info/?action=editions), public speaker and technical reviewer of "BizTalk 2010 Cookbook", Packt Publishing book and several BizTalk white papers. You can contact Sandro at: [email protected] (Twitter: @sandro_asp). Installing BizTalk Server 2013 in a Standalone Machine Contents 1.BizTalk Server Installation scenario ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Healthcare Provider Integration - Microsoft® Biztalk Server Case Study
    Healthcare Provider Integration - Microsoft® BizTalk Server Case Study “““BCBSNC was growing from 5,000 to 30,000 claims being processed per day, which meant they needed to increase the quality and accuracy of datadata.... BizTalk Server allowed them to do just that while also lowering costs and lead time.time.”””” Dan MichaelsMichaels,,,, Solution Principal Overview Innovative Architects Country or RegionRegion: United States Situation Industry: Healthcare/ Insurance BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina (BCBSNC) was anticipating growing from 5,000 claims per day to 30,000 claims per day in 2008 and 2009 as it expanded Customer Profile existing lines of business and worked to forge partnership with new customers. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North BCBSNC realized they needed to strategically plan for their infrastructure to handle Carolina (BCBSNC) is a leader in the significant increase in claims per day. delivering innovative health care products, services and information Some of the challenges that BCBSNC faced were: to more than 3.7 million members, An existing system that lacked the scalability needed to handle the including approximately 900,000 increase from 5,000 claims to 30,000 claims in processing load served on behalf of other Blue Restricted communication options -- both internally and with external Plans. The company offers its healthcare providers members discounts and information A need to lower the cost and lead time for presenting new HIPAA on a wide variety of health-related documents and interfaces internally
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Biztalk Server 2009 Technical Overview Microsoft Corporation April 2009
    Microsoft BizTalk Server 2009 Technical Overview Microsoft Corporation April 2009 Abstract Microsoft® BizTalk® Server 2009 helps organizations meet the challenges of creating automated business processes that connect diverse systems. From its initial roots in EAI and B2B integration, BizTalk Server continues to add new capabilities and engine im provements that allow developers to create powerful service-oriented architectures and business process integration and management solutions, and that enable administrators and business users to more effectively monitor ongoing business processes. BizTalk Server 2009 represents the next release in Microsoft’s long -term strategy to enable the connected enterprise. This technical overview provides you with a guided tour o f BizTalk Server 2009. It provides a walkthrough of the important features and business benefits of BizTalk Server and provides a detailed primer on how developers, administrators, and business users use BizTalk Server to develop and manage business process solutions. The information contained in this document represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information presented after the date of publication. This technical overview is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT. Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. Without limiting the rights under copyright, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), or for any purpose, without the express written permission of Microsoft Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Step-Up Licenses January 2007
    Brief Step-up Licenses January 2007 Corporate and Academic ♦ Open Value License♦Select License♦Enterprise Agreement♦ Academic Select License Customers with Software Assurance may migrate from Standard Edition software to Professional Edition or Enterprise Edition software while maintaining their Software Assurance coverage on a given product. The Step-up License makes it easier for customers to upgrade from a lower level edition to a higher level edition without incurring the full cost of licensing two separate editions of the software. Customers can upgrade their license as their company and needs grow. Step-up License Availability* Step Up From Step Up To Microsoft® BizTalk® Server Standard Microsoft BizTalk Server Enterprise Microsoft BizTalk Accelerator for SWIFT Standard Microsoft BizTalk Accelerator for SWIFT Microsoft BizTalk Accelerator for HIPAA Standard Microsoft BizTalk Accelerator for HIPAA Enterprise Microsoft BizTalk Accelerator for RosettaNet Microsoft BizTalk Accelerator for RosettaNet Standard Enterprise Microsoft BizTalk Accelerator for HL7 Standard Microsoft BizTalk Accelerator for HL7 Enterprise Microsoft Commerce Server Standard Microsoft Commerce Server Enterprise Microsoft CRM Customer Service Professional User Microsoft CRM Customer Service Professional User Microsoft CRM Sales Standard User Microsoft CRM Sales Professional User Microsoft CRM Suite Standard User Microsoft CRM Suite Professional User Microsoft Exchange Server Standard Microsoft Exchange Server Enterprise Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Biztalk Server
    Microsoft BizTalk Server From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Microsoft BizTalk Server, often referred to as simply "BizTalk", is an Enterprise Service Bus. Through the use of "adapters" which are tailored to communicate with different software systems used in an enterprise, it enables companies to automate business processes. Offered by Microsoft, it provides the following functions: Enterprise Application Integration,Business Process Automation, Business-to- business Communication, Message broker, and Business Activity Monitoring. Recently[when?] the BizTalk Server is repositioned not only as the Application Integration Server but also as the Application Server. In a common scenario, BizTalk enables companies to integrate and manage automated business processes by exchanging business documents such as purchase orders and invoices between disparate applications, within or across organizational boundaries. Human-centric processes cannot be implemented directly with BizTalk Server and need additional applications like Microsoft SharePoint server. Development for BizTalk Server is done through Microsoft Visual Studio. A developer can create transformation maps transforming one message type to another (for example an XML file can be transformed to SAP IDocs, etc.). Messages inside BizTalk are implemented through the XML documents and defined with the XML schemas in XSD standard. Maps are implemented with the XSLT standard. Orchestrations are implemented with the WS-BPEL compatible process language xLANG. Schemas, maps, pipelines and orchestrations
    [Show full text]
  • SMARTEAM V5.16 Optimizes Value Chain Collaboration
    Software Announcement November 8, 2005 SMARTEAM V5.16 optimizes value chain collaboration Overview Pro/ENGINEER, SolidWorks, Solid Edge and Autodesk products, as well At a glance SMARTEAM V5.16 delivers design as an expanded capability for secure continuity among value chain project reuse. SMARTEAM V5.16 Optimizes value partners and optimizes processes chain collaboration: Collaborative Workspaces: V5.16 across expanded product knowledge, • including multi-CAD, while enhancing enhances collaboration and change Facilitates reconciliation of competitiveness and solution management through a fortified exchanged CATIA engineering cost-effectiveness through partner bi-directional links mechanism, data, enhancing design chain offerings. enhanced embedded best-in-market continuity viewing and markup, and optimal • Enables early and rapid design Product, Process, Resource (PPR) Web deployment scenarios. capture via a partner sales V5.16 enhances engineering Continued 3D XML compliance in the configurator, improving productivity through powerful competitiveness capabilities for integrating SMARTEAM environment extends exchanged CATIA relational data, as collaboration to non-traditional • Enhances workflows, links to well as impact analysis and digital Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) data, project security and mock-up processes. users and customers. integration with DMU, optimizing decision making and A new SMARTEAM product delivers Component Application Architecture IP reuse 3D comparison and (CAA): V5.16 leverages platform lifecycle-managed synchronization flexibility and openness to extend • Delivers flexible PLM platform of exchanged CATIA relational data, solutions value and scope, including openness, extending solution fortifying design chain continuity. through new partner offerings. value across assets and users Impact analysis leverages tight • Generic sales configurator SMARTEAM link relationships to available from Tacton leverages Planned availability dates expose the full impact of a design item data with a business rules change, enhancing decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Sentinet for Biztalk Server SENTINET SENTINET Sentinet for Biztalk Server 1
    Sentinet for BizTalk Server SENTINET SENTINET Sentinet for BizTalk Server 1 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Sentinet Benefits ........................................................................................................................................... 3 SOA and API Repository ................................................................................................................................ 4 Security ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Mediation and Virtualization .................................................................................................................... 5 Authentication and Authorization ............................................................................................................ 7 Monitoring, Recording and Service Agreements Management ................................................................... 8 Deployment Topologies ................................................................................................................................ 9 Isolated Deployment ................................................................................................................................. 9 Collocated Deployment ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft and Oracle Application Platform Comparison
    Microsoft and Oracle Application Platform Comparison Published: March 2008 Applies To: Microsoft Application Platform Summary: The purpose of this whitepaper is to compare Microsoft Application Platform capabilities and benefits with the Oracle Application Platform. Copyright The information contained in this document represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information presented after the date of publication. This White Paper is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT. Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. Without limiting the rights under copyright, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), or for any purpose, without the express written permission of Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft may have patents, patent applications, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights covering subject matter in this document. Except as expressly provided in any written license agreement from Microsoft, the furnishing of this document does not give users any license to these patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property. Unless otherwise noted, the example companies, organizations, products, domain names, e-mail addresses, logos, people, places and events depicted herein are fictitious, and no association with any real company, organization, product, domain name, email address, logo, person, place or event is intended or should be inferred.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft OLE DB Provider for DB2
    Microsoft OLE DB Provider for DB2 Version 4.0 Product Documentation (Last updated 31st January, 2012) The Microsoft OLE DB Provider for DB2 V 4.0 documentation provides information for installing and using version 4 of the Microsoft OLE DB Provider for DB2 (Data Provider). Copyright Information in this document, including URL and other Internet Web site references, is subject to change without notice. Unless otherwise noted, the companies, organizations, products, domain names, e-mail addresses, logos, people, places, and events depicted in examples herein are fictitious. No association with any real company, organization, product, domain name, e-mail address, logo, person, place, or event is intended or should be inferred. Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. Without limiting the rights under copyright, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), or for any purpose, without the express written permission of Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft may have patents, patent applications, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights covering subject matter in this document. Except as expressly provided in any written license agreement from Microsoft, the furnishing of this document does not give you any license to these patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property. © 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Server, SQL Server, Active Directory, Hyper-V, and Visual Studio are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. Table of Contents Getting Started................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Using Microsoft Biztalk Server 2010 to Exchange Documents with Microsoft Dynamics AX
    Microsoft Dynamics® AX 2012 Using Microsoft BizTalk Server 2010 to exchange documents with Microsoft Dynamics AX White Paper This white paper provides information about how to configure Application Integration Framework and Microsoft BizTalk Server 2010 to enable the exchange of service documents. Date: July 2011 www.microsoft.com/dynamics/ax Jim Travis, Senior Writer Send suggestions and comments about this document to [email protected]. Please include the title with your feedback. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................ 4 Audience.............................................................................................................................. 4 Prerequisites ........................................................................................................................ 4 System requirements ............................................................................................................ 4 Frequently asked questions ........................................................................ 5 Upgrading BizTalk integration from Microsoft Dynamics AX2009 ................................................. 5 What happened to the BizTalk adapter? ................................................................................ 5 What happened to channels and endpoints? .......................................................................... 5 Services and AIF ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biztalk Glossary
    BizTalk Glossary Here are the most common terms used in our BizTalk Server training classes. A adapter A COM or .NET-based component that provides transport protocol or application connectivity operations for receiving and sending messages to or from BizTalk Server. The BizTalk Adapter Framework offers a stable, open interface for all adapters to work with the Biztalk Messaging Engine. assembler A send pipeline component that serializes (writes) messages to a file, and may combine individual messagess into a batch. assembly Regarding BizTalk, a dll file that contains a collection of BizTalk artifacts such as schemas, maps, orchestrations, or pipelines. atomic transactions DTC-style, COM+ transactions used in BizTalk orchestrations. B binding An established mapping between a BizTalk service subscribing to messages, such as an orchestration or a send port, and physical adapter-specific endpoints (URIs). BizTalk XML Schema Editor A tool hosted within Visual Studio .NET, for constructing BizTalk Server schemas. BizTalk Explorer A tool hosted within Visual Studio .NET, that displays the contents of assemblies, ports, orchestrations, and parties in the BizTalk Configuration database. BizTalk Explorer Object Model The APIs used by BizTalk Explorer or custom tools to automate the post-deployment tasks such as creating ports, binding orchestrations, or managing party properties. BizTalk group A group that contains MessageBoxes, hosts, receives locations, send ports, and send port groups, orchestrations, servers, and adapters. BizTalk Mapper A visual tool, hosted within Visual Studio .NET, for constructing BizTalk maps, which define data transformations. BizTalk message queuing adapter An adapter that enables exchange of messages between BizTalk Server and Microsoft Message Queue (MSMQ).
    [Show full text]