Denison Mines Corp. Wheeler River Project Denison Mines Corp. Projet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Denison Mines Corp. Wheeler River Project Denison Mines Corp. Projet UNPROTECTED/NON PROTÉGÉ ORIGINAL/ORIGINAL CMD: 19-H111 Date signed/Signé le : NOVEMBER 29, 2019 Request for a Commission Decision on Demande de décision de la the Scope of an Environmental Commission sur la portée d’une Assessment for évaluation environnementale pour ce qui suit Denison Mines Corp. Denison Mines Corp. Wheeler River Project Projet Wheeler River Hearing in writing based solely on Audience fondée uniquement sur des written submissions mémoires Scheduled for: Prévue pour : December 2019 Décembre 2019 Submitted by: Soumise par : CNSC Staff Le personnel de la CCSN e-Doc: 6005470 (WORD) e-Doc: 6016260 (PDF) 19-H111 UNPROTECTED/ NON PROTÉGÉ Summary Résumé This Commission member document Le présent document à l’intention des (CMD) pertains to a request for a decision commissaires (CMD) concerne une regarding: demande de décision au sujet de : . the scope of the factors to be taken into . la portée des éléments à prendre en account in the environmental compte dans l’évaluation assessment being conducted for the environnementale pour le projet Wheeler River Project Wheeler River The following actions are requested of the La Commission pourrait considérer prendre Commission: les mesures suivantes : . Determine the scope of the factors of . Déterminer la portée des éléments de the environmental assessment. l’évaluation environnementale. The following items are attached: Les pièces suivantes sont jointes : . regulatory basis for the . fondement réglementaire des recommendations recommandations . environmental assessment process map . diagramme du processus d’évaluation . disposition table of public and environnementale Indigenous groups’ comments on the . tableau des réponses aux commentaires project description for the Wheeler du public et des groupes autochtones River Project sur la description du projet Wheeler . project description River . description du projet e-Doc: 6005470 (WORD) - ii - November 29, 2019 e-Doc: 6016260 (PDF) 19-H111 UNPROTECTED/ NON PROTÉGÉ TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 1 SOMMAIRE .......................................................................................................... 3 1 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Background ..................................................................................... 5 2 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION .......................................................... 11 2.1 Environmental Assessment Determination .................................... 11 2.2 Indigenous Consultation ................................................................ 12 2.3 Federal and Provincial Authorities’ Participation ........................... 14 2.4 Public and Indigenous Participation and Participant Funding ........ 16 2.5 Scope of Environmental Assessment ............................................ 19 2.5.1 Project Scope ......................................................................... 20 2.5.2 Scope of the Factors to be Considered .................................. 20 2.6 Next Steps ..................................................................................... 21 3 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................... 22 3.1 Overall Conclusions ....................................................................... 22 3.2 Overall Recommendations ............................................................ 22 REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 23 GLOSSARY ........................................................................................................ 24 A. REGULATORY BASIS FOR THE RECOMMENDATIONS ........................... 25 B. CEAA 2012 PROCESS MAP ......................................................................... 28 C. DISPOSITION TABLE OF PUBLIC AND INDIGENOUS GROUPS’ COMMENTS ON THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR THE WHEELER RIVER PROJECT .......................................................................................... 29 D. WHEELER RIVER PROJECT – PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................... 38 e-Doc: 6005470 (WORD) - v - November 29, 2019 e-Doc: 6016260 (PDF) 19-H111 UNPROTECTED/ NON PROTÉGÉ This page was intentionally left blank. e-Doc: 6005470 (WORD) - iv - November 29, 2019 e-Doc: 6016260 (PDF) 19-H111 UNPROTECTED/ NON PROTÉGÉ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this Commission member document (CMD) is to request that the Commission determine the scope of the factors to be taken into account for the environmental assessment (EA) of the proposed Wheeler River Project by Denison Mines Corp. (Denison) for a new uranium mine near Russell Lake, Saskatchewan. In February 2019, Denison submitted a project description [1] for the Wheeler River Project (the project); a proposed new in situ recovery (ISR) uranium mining and processing operation to be located in the eastern Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan. The scope of the proposed project would include underground and surface facilities to support the mining and processing of uranium ore using the ISR mining method, and producing up to 5400 tonnes of triuranium octoxide (U3O8) annually over a 20‒year operating period. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) staff reviewed the Wheeler River Project description and confirmed that the project description is complete and in accordance with the Prescribed Information for the Description of a Designated Project Regulations under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (CEAA 2012). CNSC staff also concluded that the project meets the definition of a “designated project” in the Regulations Designating Physical Activities (SOR/2012-147) and therefore requires an EA under CEAA 2012. As per the transition provision, section 182, of the Impact Assessment Act, 2019 (IAA 2019), the Wheeler River project commenced under CEAA 2012 and will continue to be completed under this legislation. This project is also subject to the EA requirements of the Government of Saskatchewan under The Environmental Assessment Act of Saskatchewan. Both the federal and provincial EAs will be coordinated to the extent possible. For example, only one environmental impact statement (EIS) will be produced to meet the needs of both EA processes. In addition, CNSC staff notified relevant federal authorities of the EA and requested information on their potential participation in the EA and/or interest in receiving further information. Indigenous communities identified as potentially having an interest in the project received a notice of the commencement of the EA and a copy of the project description for comment. CNSC staff also made the project description available on the Canadian Impact Assessment Registry website for a period of 30 days to seek public and Indigenous comments on the project in order to inform the conduct of the EA. The CNSC provided detailed responses to all comments received by members of the public and Indigenous groups. Both the comments and the responses were posted on the Canadian Impact Assessment Registry website and shared with all commenters. Future public and Indigenous participation opportunities for the project include the review of the draft EIS, EA report and Commission member documentation, as well as participation in the EA public hearing. Participant funding will be offered to facilitate this participation. e-Doc: 6005470 (WORD) - 1 - November 29, 2019 e-Doc: 6016260 (PDF) 19-H111 UNPROTECTED/ NON PROTÉGÉ All EAs under CEAA 2012 are required to consider certain factors listed under paragraphs 19(1)(a) to (h) of CEAA 2012, including the purpose of the project, alternative means of carrying out the project, environmental effects, the significance of these effects, and comments from the public and Indigenous peoples. Paragraph 19(1)(i) of CEAA 2012 also requires the Commission to consider any relevant regional study conducted by a committee established by the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Canada. Under paragraph 19(1)(j), the Commission has the discretion of taking into account any other matter relevant to the EA that the CNSC, as the responsible authority, requires to be taken into account. Taking into account public and Indigenous comments and CNSC staff’s review of the project description, CNSC staff recommend to the Commission that the scope of factors to be considered include the factors mandated in paragraphs 19(1)(a) to (h) of CEAA 2012 and that no other factors be considered in this EA. Referenced documents in this CMD are available to the public upon request. e-Doc: 6005470 (WORD) - 2 - November 29, 2019 e-Doc: 6016260 (PDF) 19-H111 UNPROTECTED/ NON PROTÉGÉ SOMMAIRE L’objectif de ce document à l’intention des commissaires (CMD) est de demander à la Commission de déterminer la portée des éléments à examiner dans l’évaluation environnementale (EE) du projet Wheeler River de Denison Mines Corp. (ci-après Denison) concernant l’exploitation d’une nouvelle mine d’uranium près de Russell Lake, en Saskatchewan. En février 2019, Denison a présenté une description [1] du projet Wheeler River (ci-après le projet) : un projet d’extraction par récupération in situ et de traitement de l’uranium qui sera localisé dans la partie est du bassin Athabasca, dans le Nord de la Saskatchewan. La portée du projet englobe les infrastructures sous terre et en surface pour soutenir l’extraction et le traitement du minerai d’uranium au moyen de la méthode de récupération in situ,
Recommended publications
  • + 2020 Annual Information Form
    Denison Mines Corp. 2020 Annual Information Form March 26, 2021 ABOUT THIS ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM This annual information form (“AIF”) is dated March 26, Table of Contents 2021. Unless stated otherwise, all of the information in this AIF is stated as at December 31, 2020. About this AIF .................................... 1 About Denison ................................... 6 This AIF has been prepared in accordance with Canadian Developments over the Last Three securities laws and contains information regarding Years ................................................. 8 Denison’s history, business, mineral reserves and The Uranium Industry ........................ 17 resources, the regulatory environment in which Denison Mineral Resources and Reserves 24 does business, the risks that Denison faces and other Mineral Properties ............................. 27 important information for Shareholders. Athabasca Exploration: Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification ........... 102 This AIF incorporates by reference: Denison Operations ........................... 107 Manager of UPC ................................ 111 Denison’s management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) for the year ended December 31, 2020, Denison Closed Mines Group ........... 112 Environmental, Health, Safety and Denison’s audited consolidated financial Sustainability Matters ........................ 112 statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, Government Regulation .................... 114 Risk Factors ...................................... 120 both of which
    [Show full text]
  • Wheeler River Project Provincial Technical Proposal and Federal Project Description
    Wheeler River Project Provincial Technical Proposal and Federal Project Description Denison Mines Corp. May 2019 WHEELER RIVER PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL & PROJECT DESCRIPTION Wheeler River Project Provincial Technical Proposal and Federal Project Description Project Summary English – Page ii French – Page x Dene – Page xx Cree – Page xxviii PAGE i WHEELER RIVER PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL & PROJECT DESCRIPTION Summary Wheeler River Project The Wheeler River Project (Wheeler or the Project) is a proposed uranium mine and processing plant in northern Saskatchewan, Canada. It is located in a relatively undisturbed area of the boreal forest about 4 km off of Highway 914 and approximately 35 km north-northeast of the Key Lake uranium operation. Wheeler is a joint venture project owned by Denison Mines Corp. (Denison) and JCU (Canada) Exploration Company Ltd. (JCU). Denison owns 90% of Wheeler and is the operator, while JCU owns 10%. Denison is a uranium exploration and development company with interests focused in the Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan, Canada with a head office in Toronto, Ontario and technical office in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Historically Denison has had over 50 years of uranium mining experience in Saskatchewan, Elliot Lake, Ontario, and in the United States. Today, the company is part owner (22.5%) of the McClean Lake Joint Venture which includes the operating McClean Lake uranium mill in northern Saskatchewan. To advance the Project, Denison is applying an innovative approach to uranium mining in Canada called in situ recovery (ISR). The use of ISR mining at Wheeler means that there will be no need for a large open pit mining operation or multiple shafts to access underground mine workings; no workers will be underground as the ISR process is conducted from surface facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Pictographs in Northern Saskatchewan: Vision Quest
    PICTOGRAPHS IN NORTHERN SASKATCHEWAN: VISION QUEST AND PAWAKAN A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology and Archaeology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon by Katherine A. Lipsett April, 1990 The author claims copyright. Use shall not be made of the material contained herein without proper acknowledgement, as indicated on the following page. The author has agreed that the Library, University of Saskatchewan, may make this thesis freely available for inspection. Moreover, the author has agreed that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised the thesis work recorded herein or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which the thesis work was done. It is understood that due recognition will be given to the author of this thesis and to the University of Saskatchewan in any use of the material in this thesis. Copying or publication or any other use of the thesis for financial gain without approval by the University of Saskatchewan and the author's written permission is prohibited. Requests for permission to copy or to make any other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Anthropology and Archaeology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada S7N OWO i ABSTRACT Pictographs in northern Saskatchewan have been linked to the vision quest ritual by Rocky Cree informants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Brabant Lake
    THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF BRABANT LAKE A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology and Archaeology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Sandra Pearl Pentney Fall 2002 © Copyright Sandra Pearl Pentney All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, In their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Anthropology and Archaeology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (S7N 5B 1) ABSTRACT Boreal forest archaeology is costly and difficult because of rugged terrain, the remote nature of much of the boreal areas, and the large expanses of muskeg.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Community Profile
    Draft Community Profile ENGLISH RIVER FIRST NATION, SASKATCHEWAN APM-REP-06144-0047 OCTOBER 2013 This report has been prepared under contract to the NWMO. The report has been reviewed by the NWMO, but the views and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NWMO. All copyright and intellectual property rights belong to the NWMO. For more information, please contact: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Sixth Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Canada Tel 416.934.9814 Toll Free 1.866.249.6966 Email [email protected] www.nwmo.ca DRAFT Community Profile English River First Nation, SK OCTOBER 2013 NWMO REPORT: APM-REP-06144-0047 PREPARED BY DPRA Canada 60 ADELAIDE ST. EAST, SUITE 501 TORONTO, ON M5C 3E4 www.dpra.ca [Page was intentionally left blank for double-sided printing] Consultants: Prepared By: Brady Romanson Signature: Reviewed By: Vicki McCulloch Signature: Approved By: Vicki McCulloch Signature: [Page was intentionally left blank for double-sided printing] English River First Nation Community Profile October 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................................ iv List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................................ v List of Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Athabasca Region
    Northern Settlement of Brabant Lake Community Highlights Brabant, a community of 100 people, is located two driving hours north of La Ronge. Trapping, Athabasca tourism, and mining are the main industries of the area. This village is located in the breath- taking beauty of the Precambrian Shield.1 Boreal West Local Government Mayor and Council:2 Churchill Chairman: Rebecca Shirley Bueckert River Member: o Harriet Jean McKenzie o Peter McKenzie First Nations Presence: There are no First Nations (Reserves) in the immediate vicinity of Brabant. Nearest First Nations: o Grandmother’s Bay reserve of Lac La Ronge Indian Band (50 km) Central Tribal Council: P rince Albert Grand Council (PAGC) Demographics3 Brabant Lake North Saskatchewan Population 102 36, 557 1, 033, 381 Aboriginal population (%) 50 86% 15% Youth population, 15 to 29 Not available 9, 620 105, 240 Major Languages Cree, English Cree, Dene, English English, Michif Labour Force Participation Rate, 15+ (%) 20 50% 68% Employment Rate, 15+ (%) 10 40% 65% Unemployment Rate (%) 0 20% 6% Median family income: Not available $31,007 $58,563 Median earnings (persons 15+ years): Not available $18,449 $23,025 Population 25+ with a high school diploma (%) 0 16% 144, 475 Population 25+ with a trades, college, or 0 36% 303, 440 university certificate, diploma, or degree (%) Northern Settlement of Brabant Lake Economic Environment Key Industries – The mining industry is a large employer, with employees community and doing shifts “in and out” at the various northern mining surrounding area
    [Show full text]
  • Zone a – Prescribed Northern Zones / Zones Nordiques Visées Par Règlement Place Names Followed by Numbers Are Indian Reserves
    Northern Residents Deductions – Places in Prescribed Zones / Déductions pour les habitants de régions éloignées – Endroits situés dans les zones visées par règlement Zone A – Prescribed northern zones / Zones nordiques visées par règlement Place names followed by numbers are Indian reserves. If you live in a place that is not listed in this publication and you think it is in a prescribed zone, contact us. / Les noms suivis de chiffres sont des réserves indiennes. Communiquez avec nous si l’endroit où vous habitez ne figure pas dans cette publication et que vous croyez qu’il se situe dans une zone visée par règlement. Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories / Yukon, Nunavut et Territoires du Nord-Ouest All places in the Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories are located in a prescribed northern zone. / Tous les endroits situés dans le Yukon, le Nunavut et les Territoires du Nord-Ouest se trouvent dans des zones nordiques visées par règlement. British Columbia / Colombie-Britannique Andy Bailey Recreation Good Hope Lake Nelson Forks Tahltan Liard River 3 Area Gutah New Polaris Mine Taku McDames Creek 2 Atlin Hyland Post Niteal Taku River McDonald Lake 1 Atlin Park Hyland Ranch Old Fort Nelson Tamarack Mosquito Creek 5 Atlin Recreation Area Hyland River Park Pavey Tarahne Park Muddy River 1 Bear Camp Iskut Pennington Telegraph Creek One Mile Point 1 Ben-My-Chree Jacksons Pleasant Camp Tetsa River Park Prophet River 4 Bennett Kahntah Porter Landing Toad River Salmon Creek 3 Boulder City Kledo Creek Park Prophet River Trutch Silver
    [Show full text]
  • Written Submission from the English River First Nation Mémoire De La Première Nation English River
    CMD 19-M36.7 Date: 2019-11-12 File / dossier : 6.02.04 Edocs pdf : 6041544 Written submission from the Mémoire de la English River First Nation Première Nation English River Regulatory Oversight Report for Rapport de surveillance Uranium Mines and Mills in Canada: réglementaire pour les mines et 2018 usines de concentration d’uranium au Canada : 2018 Commission Meeting Réunion de la Commission December 12, 2019 Le 12 décembre 2019 This page was intentionally Cette page a été intentionnellement left blank laissée en blanc Technical Memorandum Review of the Regulatory Oversight Report for Uranium Mines, Mills, Historic and Decommissioned Sites in Canada: 2018 November 10, 2019 Review of 2018 Regulatory Oversight Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 English River First Nation .......................................................................................................................... 1 Saskatchewan Uranium Industry ............................................................................................................... 2 Collaboration Agreement ........................................................................................................................... 2 Leadership Role ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Findings from Report Review ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Preeminent Uranium Explorer in Canada's Athabasca Basin
    A Preeminent Uranium Explorer in Canada’s Athabasca Basin TSX-V: SYH October 2021 Disclaimer This presentation has been prepared by Skyharbour Resources Ltd. (“SYH”) using its best efforts to realistically and factually present the information contained. However, subjective opinion, dependence upon factors outside SYH’s control and outside information sources unavoidably dictate that SYH cannot warrant the V: SYH | SKYHARBOURLTD.COM information contained to be exhaustive, complete or sufficient. In addition, many factors can effect the - presentation which could significantly alter the results intended by SYH, rendering the presentation TSX unattainable or substantially altered. Therefore, interested uses should conduct their own assessment and consult with their own professional advisors prior to making any investment decisions. This presentation does not constitute a prospectus or public offering for financing, and no guarantees are made or implied with regard to the success of SYH proposed ventures. Interested investors are advised to seek advice from the investment advisors. Some of the statements in this document may be deemed to be "forward-looking statements". All statements on in this document, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or developments that management of the Company expects, are forward-looking statements. Although management believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward- looking statements if management's beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements, include market prices, exploration and development successes, continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Denison Reports a Year of Significant Project and Company De-Risking
    Denison Mines Corp. 1100 – 40 University Ave Toronto, ON M5J 1T1 www.denisonmines.com PRESS RELEASE Denison Reports a Year of Significant Project and Company De-Risking Toronto – March 4, 2021 Denison Mines Corp. (“Denison” or the “Company”) (DML: TSX) (DNN : NYSE American) today filed its Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion & Analysis (“MD&A”) for the year ended December 31, 2020. Both documents can be found on the Company’s website at www.denisonmines.com or on SEDAR (at www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (at www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml). The highlights provided below are derived from these documents and should be read in conjunction with them. All amounts in this release are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated. David Cates, President and CEO of Denison commented, “Confronted with the varied challenges of the global COVID-19 pandemic, Denison’s resilient teams excelled in 2020 and early 2021 – accomplishing a significant de-risking of our flagship Wheeler River project and the Company’s balance sheet. At Wheeler River, our technical team achieved a key milestone, receiving an independent confirmation of ‘Proof of Concept’ for the application of the In-Situ Recovery (‘ISR’) mining method at the high-grade Phoenix deposit. We also completed an important trade-off study leading to the adoption of a freeze ‘wall’ design for containment of the ISR operation at Phoenix – a decision that is expected to be favourable from an environmental standpoint, reduce technical complexity and operational risks, allow for a phased mining approach with lower up-front capital costs, and strengthen project sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • CSD Code Census Subdivision (CSD) Name 2011 Income Score
    2011 Income 2011 Education 2011 Housing 2011 Labour Force 2011 CWB 2011 Global Non‐ Type of 2011 NHS CSD Code Census subdivision (CSD) name Score Score Score Activity Score Score Response Province Collectivity Population 1001105 Portugal Cove South 67 36% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 160 1001113 Trepassey 90 42 95 71 74 35% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 545 1001131 Renews‐Cappahayden 78 46 95 82 75 35% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 310 1001144 Aquaforte 72 31% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 90 1001149 Ferryland 78 53 94 70 74 48% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 465 1001169 St. Vincent's‐St. Stephen's‐Peter's River 81 54 94 69 74 37% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 315 1001174 Gaskiers‐Point La Haye 71 39% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 235 1001186 Admirals Beach 79 22% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 85 1001192 St. Joseph's 72 27% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 125 1001203 Division No. 1, Subd. X 76 44 91 77 72 45% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 495 1001228 St. Bride's 76 38 96 78 72 24% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 295 1001281 Chance Cove 74 40% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 120 1001289 Chapel Arm 79 47 92 78 74 38% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 405 1001304 Division No. 1, Subd. E 80 48 96 78 76 20% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 2990 1001308 Whiteway 80 50 93 82 76 25% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 255 1001321 Division No. 1, Subd. F 74 41 98 70 71 45% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 550 1001328 New Perlican 66 28% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 120 1001332 Winterton 78 38 95 61 68 41% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 475 1001339 Division No.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction a Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada
    Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction A Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada Len Garis, Sarah Hughan, Paul Maxim, and Alex Tyakoff October 2016 Executive Summary Despite the steady reduction in rates of fire that have been witnessed in Canada in recent years, ongoing research has demonstrated that there continue to be striking inequalities in the way in which fire risk is distributed through society. It is well-established that residential dwelling fires are not distributed evenly through society, but that certain sectors in Canada experience disproportionate numbers of incidents. Oftentimes, it is the most vulnerable segments of society who face the greatest risk of fire and can least afford the personal and property damage it incurs. Fire risks are accentuated when property owners or occupiers fail to install and maintain fire and life safety devices such smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors in their homes. These life saving devices are proven to be highly effective, inexpensive to obtain and, in most cases, Canadian fire services will install them for free. A key component of driving down residential fire rates in Canadian cities, towns, hamlets and villages is the identification of communities where fire risk is greatest. Using the internationally recognized Home Safe methodology described in this study, the following Aboriginal and Non- Aboriginal communities in provinces and territories across Canada are determined to be at heightened risk of residential fire. These communities would benefit from a targeted smoke alarm give-away program and public education campaign to reduce the risk of residential fires and ensure the safety and well-being of all Canadian citizens.
    [Show full text]