Resettlement Plan
Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan for Jarwar Document Stage: Final Project Number: 37192 December 2007
PAK: Power Transmission Enhancement Investment Program – Tranche 2
Prepared by National Transmission and Despatch Company
The land acquisition and resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN
Pakistan - Power Transmission Enhancement Program ADB MFF Tranche 2
Subproject No. 8
Dispersal of Power from Jarwar IPP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Double Circuit Transmission Line
Short Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan
National Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC) GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
November 2007
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table of Contents Abbreviations Definition of Terms Executive Summary
1.H INTRODUCTION ...... Error! Bookmark not defined.
1.1H Background...... H4
1.2H Description of the Subproject...... H5
2.H PROJECT COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION FRAMEWORK ...... H6
2.1H Pakistan’s Law and Regulations on Land Acquisition and Resettlement ...... H6
2.2H ADB’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy...... H7
2.3H Comparison of Land Acquisition Act and ADB Resettlement Policy...... H7
2.4H Remedial Measures to Bridge the GAP...... H8
2.5H Legislation Relevant to Land Classification ...... H8
2.6H Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements for the Project...... H8
2.7H Eligibility...... H10
2.8H Compensation Entitlements...... H10
2.9H Assessment of Compensation Unit Values...... H12
3.H ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS...... H13
3.1H Minimization of Impacts ...... H13 3.2 Resettlement Surveys...... 13 3.3 Impacts of the Power Plant and Sub-Station ...... 13 3.4 Impacts of Transmission Line ...... 14 3.5 Affected Households...... 18
4.H SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF AFFECTED PEOPLE ...... H19
4.1H Census of Affected Households ...... H19
4.2H Data on Heads of Affected Households...... H20
4.3H Data on Affected Households ...... H20
5.H INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS...... H24
5.1H National Transmission and Dispatch Company...... H24
5.2H District Government...... H25
5.3H Other Agencies and Institutions...... H26
5.4H Responsibility for Internal and External Monitoring...... H27
6.H CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSURE ...... H28
6.1H Consultation Undertaken for the LARP...... H28
6.2H Compensation Options Discussed...... H29
7.H GRIEVANCE REDRESS PROCESS...... H30
8.H BUDGET FOR LAND AND ASSET ACQUISITION...... H31
LARP Jarwar–Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 Page ii Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
8.1H Basis for Compensation...... H31
8.2H Determining the Rates for Compensation...... H31
8.3H Budget for Land and Asset Acquisition...... H33
9.H IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE...... H35
10.H MONITORING AND EVALUATION ...... H37
10.1H Internal Monitoring...... H37
10.2H External Monitoring...... H38
10.3H Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation...... H38
10.4H Resettlement Databank...... H39
10.5H Reporting Requirements...... H39
APPENDICES Appendix 1 - Working Tables Appendix 2 - List of Participants in Consultation Sessions Appendix 3 - Draft Public Information Brochure Appendix 4 - Terms of Reference for External Monitoring (Consultant/NGO)
FIGURES Figure 1.1 Location of Jarwar (Ghotki) - Sadiqabad Transmission Line ...... 5 Figure 5.1 LAR Organogram and Actions...... 25 Figure 5.2 Organization of District Land Acquisition Collector Office...... 26 Figure 5.3 Organization of Land Acquisition Steering Committee ...... 27 Figure 5.4 Organization of Land Acquisition Co-ordination Committee ...... 28
TABLES Table 2.1: Pakistan and ADB Land Acquisition Policies...... 8 Table 2.2: Entitlement Matrix ...... 9 Table 3.1: Length of Transmission Line by Type of Land Traversed ...... 14 Table 3.2: Resettlement Impacts of Towers on Private Farmlands ...... 15 Table 3.3: Transmission Line Impacts by Type of Land ...... 16 Table 3.4: Resettlement Impacts of Transmission Line Corridor Private Farmlands.....16 Table 3.5: Total Area of Affected Crops by Type of Land...... 17 Table 3.6: Affected Fruit and Wood Trees by Type of Line ...... 17 Table 3.7: Percentage of Crop Loss by Affected Households ...... 18 Table 3.8: Affected Households by Towers and Transmission Line Corridor...... 19 Table 4.1: Affected Households and Population by Location ...... 20 Table 4.2: Social Group of Affected Households...... 21
LARP Jarwar–Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 Page iii
Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 4.3: Affected Household Size ...... 22 Table 4.4: Gender Composition of Affected Households...... 22 Table 4.5: Age and Gender Composition of AHs...... 22 Table 4.6: Farm Size of Affected Households ...... 23 Table 4.7: Involvement of AHs by Gender in Income Sectors ...... 23 Table 4.8: Sector-Wise Average Incomes by Gender of Affected Households ...... 23 Table 4.9: Monthly Per Capita Income of Affected Households ...... 24 Table 4.10: Literacy by Age and Gender of AHs ...... 24 Table 5.2: Organization of District Land Acquisition Collector Office...... 26 Table 6.1: Participants in Group Discussions and Consultations ...... 29 Table 7.1: Grievance Resolution Process...... 31 Table 8.1: Average Rate/Price for Crops in Subproject Area ...... 33 Table 8.2: Area Under Tower and Transmission Line According to the Crop...... 33 Table 8.3: Average Rate/Price for Trees in Subproject Area...... 33 Table 8.4: Estimated Resettlement Cost of Jarwar Subproject ...... 34 Table 9.1: Implementation Schedule for Jarwar Subproject ...... 36
LARP Jarwar–Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 Page iv
Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank AHs Affected households CBC Citizen Community Board CBP Community Based Organization DMS Detailed Measurement Survey DOR District Officer Revenues EMA External Monitoring Agency ft foot / feet (3.28 ft = 1 m) GRC Grievance Redress Committee GSC Grid System Construction (department of NTDC) IMO Independent monitoring organization IPDF Indigenous Peoples Development Framework IPDP Indigenous Peoples Development Plan IPP Independent Power Producer (Private Sector Power Generation entity) kanal unit of land measurement: 1 kanal = 20 marlas (8 kanal = 1 acre) km kilometer kV kilo-Volt LAA Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (amended) LAC Land Acquisition Collector LARF Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan LARU Land Acquisition and Resettlement Unit (NTDC) m meter marla smallest unit of land measurement: 1 marla = 272.25 ft2 (= 25.31 m2) MOWP Ministry of Power and Water MRM Management Review Meeting NGO Non-governmental organization NTDC National Transmission and Dispatch Company PD Project Director of NTDC PIB Public Information Booklet PMU Project Management Unit PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance RFS Resettlement field survey ROW Right-of-way Rs. Pakistani rupees (currency): Rs. 60.90 = US$1.00 SPC Star Power Company [an Independent Power Producer (IPP)] TOR Terms of Reference WAPDA Water and Power Development Authority
LARP Jarwar–Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 Page i
Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Definition of Terms Affected persons (APs) mean all the people affected by land acquisition, relocation, or loss of incomes and includes any person, household (referred to as project affected family or affected household [AH]), firms, or public or private institutions. APs therefore include; i) persons affected directly by the safety corridor, right-of-way, tower or pole foundations or construction work area; (ii) persons whose agricultural land or other productive assets such as trees or crops are affected; (iii) persons whose businesses are affected and who might experience loss of income due to the project impact; (iv) persons who lose work/employment as a result of project impact; and (v) people who lose access to community resources/property as a result of the project. Compensation means payment in cash or kind for an asset to be acquired or affected by a project at replacement cost at current market value. Cut-off-date means the date after which people will NOT be considered eligible for compensation i.e. they are not included in the list of APs/AHs as defined by the census. Normally, the cut-off date is the date of the detailed measurement survey. Encroachers mean those people who move into the project area after the cut-off date and are therefore not eligible for compensation or other rehabilitation measures provided by the project. Entitlement means the range of measures comprising cash or in-kind compensation, relocation cost, income rehabilitation assistance, transfer assistance, income/livelihood restoration which are due to AHs, depending on the type and degree nature of their losses to restore their social and economic base. Inventory of losses means the pre-appraisal inventory of assets as a preliminary record of affected or lost assets. Land acquisition means the process whereby a person is compelled by a public agency to alienate all or part of the land s/he owns or possesses, to the ownership and possession of the agency for public purposes, in return for fair compensation. The land acquisition and resettlement plan is known as a LARP. Non-titled means those who have no recognizable rights or claims to the land that they are occupying and includes people using private or state land without permission, permit or grant i.e. those people without legal title to land and/or structures occupied or used by them. ADB’s policy explicitly states that such people cannot be denied compensation. Poor means those falling below the official national poverty line (equivalent to 2,350 calories per day) of Rs 848.79 per person per month (2004). Replacement cost means the method of valuing assets to replace the loss at current market value, or its nearest equivalent, and is the amount of cash or kind needed to replace an asset in its existing condition, without deduction of transaction costs or for any material salvaged. Resettlement Field Survey means the detailed inventory of losses that is completed after detailed design and marking of project boundaries on the ground, socioeconomic data on the affected households/families, and stakeholder consultations. Sharecropper means the same as tenant cultivator or tenant farmer, and is a person who cultivates land they do not own for an agreed proportion of crop or harvest. Significant impact means 200 people or more will experience major impacts, which are defined as; (i) being physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing ten per cent or more of their productive assets (income generating). Vulnerable means any people who might suffer disproportionately or face the risk of being marginalized from the effects of resettlement and includes; (i) female- headed households with dependents; (ii) disabled household heads; (iii) poor households (within the meaning given previously); (iv) landless; (v) elderly households with no means of support; (vi) households without security of tenure; (vii) ethnic minorities; and (viii) marginal farmers (with landholdings of five acres or less).
LARP Jarwar–Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 Page ii
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Executive Summary 1. The Subproject: The New Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132kV transmission line subproject (the subproject) has been prepared by NTDC to transmit the power to be generated at Jarwar Power Plant by the Star Power Generation Limited Company (SPC), an independent power producer (IPP) in District Ghotki (Sindh Province), to the existing 132kV sub-station at Sadiqabad in District Rahimyar Khan (Punjab Province), by constructing a 63.8 km long 132 kV double circuit transmission line. Some 29 ha of land for the Power Plant was purchased by SPC on voluntary sale basis in April 2005, and not acquired using eminent domain under the Land Acquisition Act, this Short LARP therefore does not include the Power Plant component. The new transmission line includes a 45.19 km long section through Ghotki district and a 18.65 km section through Rahimyar Khan district. In total the line will traverse 62.25 km of partially cultivated private land and 1.59 km of uncultivated Government land. As a result, a total of 162.26 ha of cropped area and 98 trees (22 fruit and 76 wood trees) will be affected. The subproject will impact 180 affected households (AHs) with a population of 2,083. None of the AHs lose 10% or more of productive assets or are relocated, and in accordance with this minor impact, a Short LARP has been prepared. Compensation and rehabilitation for the impacts will be provided as shown in the following matrix. Table 1: Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements Matrix
Asset Specification Affected People Compensation Entitlements Arable Land Access is not Farmer/Titleholder No Land compensation provided that land is rehabilitated/restored to restricted and former quality following completion of works. Compensation, in cash, for existing or current all damaged crops and trees as per item below land use will Leaseholder No Land compensation provided that the land is rehabilitated/restored to remain (registered or not) former quality following completion of works. Compensation, in cash, for unchanged all damaged crops and trees as per item below Sharecroppers Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees as per item (registered or not) below Agricultural Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees as per item workers below Squatters Compensation, in cash, for all damaged crops/trees as per item below Land for land compensation with plots of equal value and productivity to the plots lost; or cash for affected land at replacement cost based on Farmer/Titleholder market value plus 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge and free of taxes, registration, and transfer costs
Renewal of lease in plots of equal value/productivity of plots lost, or Cash All adverse Leaseholder equivalent to market value of gross yield of affected land for the remaining effects on land (registered or not) lease years (up to a maximum of 3 years). use independent Sharecroppers of severity of Cash compensation equal to market value of lost harvest share once impact (registered or not) (temporary impact) or twice (permanent impact) Arable Land where Agricultural Cash indemnity equal to salary (including portions in kind) for remaining access is workers part of agricultural year. restricted 1 rehabilitation allowance equal to market value of 1 gross harvest Squatters and/or land (additional to crop compensation) for land use loss. use will be 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross harvest of Farmer/Titleholder affected Additional for affected land for 1 year (inclusive of winter and summer crop and Leaseholder severe impacts additional to standard crop compensation) (>10% of land Sharecroppers 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of harvest share loss) (registered or not) (additional to standard crop compensation) 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross harvest of the Squatters affected land for 1 year (inclusive of winter and summer crop and additional to standard crop compensation)
LARP Jarwar–Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 Page i
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Asset Specification Affected People Compensation Entitlements Land x land through provision of plots comparable in value/location to plot Titleholder lost; or cash for affected land at full replacement cost free of taxes, Residential/ registration, transfer costs plus 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge. Commercial Renter, 1-3 months allowance Land Leaseholder Accommodation in a government resettlement area or a self-relocation Squatters allowance All relevant AHs, Cash compensation at replacement rate for affected structure/other fixed Houses and incl. squatters assets free of salvaged materials, depreciation or transaction costs. For Structures partial impacts full cash assistance to restore remaining structure. All AHs, incl. Crop compensation in cash at full market rate for one harvest (either squatters winter or summer) by default for impacts caused by tower bases and Crops Crops affected perimeter, stringing and access. All other crop losses will be compensated at market rates based on actual losses. All AHs, incl. Trees Trees affected squatters Cash compensation shall reflect income replacement
All AHs, incl. Business owner: (i) Cash compensation equal to 1 year income, if loss squatters permanent; (ii) cash compensation for the period of business interruption, Business loss of business if loss is temporary. Employment or employment Worker/employee: lost wages indemnity for the business interruption period up to a 3 months maximum. All AHs so Transport, Provision of sufficient allowance to cover transport expenses and Relocation affected transition costs livelihood expenses for one month.
Rehabilitation/substitution of affected structures/utilities (i.e. mosques, Community roads, schools etc. Vulnerable AH below poverty Employment priority in project-related jobs. AH line
2. Significance of Impact. As there is no restriction of access to, or use of, land, there will be no permanent loss of land. No houses or shops nor any community structures will be affected. There are no impacts on businesses or income losses from business. Therefore none of the AHs will experience significant resettlement impacts. 3. Indigenous People Issues. All 180 AHs are Muslims and ethnically Sindhi and Siraiki, the AHs do not include any tribal nor minority people. The ADB’s Policy on Indigenous People, as specified in the Indigenous Peoples Development Framework (IPDF) prepared for by NTDC for this program is not triggered, and therefore neither an IPDP nor special action is required for this subproject. 4. Participatory Land Acquisition Process. The program’s LARF has been translated into Urdu and disclosed according to ADB’s public communications policy, it has also been uploaded to ADB’s website. For the preparation of this LARP, on behalf of NTDC, consultation has been undertaken through a series of meetings with local government agencies, AHs, as well as wider community group meetings of both men and women. The resettlement field survey (RFS) was a participatory process, with the head of household assisting in identification and calculation of losses. Further consultation will be required during the implementation of the LARP.
LARP Jarwar–Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 Page ii
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
5. Grievance Mechanism. There is also a process established to deal with any issues or concerns raised on any aspect of the LARP or compensation process. The verbal or written grievances of AHs will be heard by the district level Land Acquisition Coordinating Committees (LACCs), which will be established to assist NTDC implement the LARP. 6. Cost of Plan. The budget has been established using the rates derived through consultation with the affected communities and the local markets in both Sindh and Punjab provinces. The costs for compensation for the 180 AHs and external monitoring (including the administration charge of 15 per cent and a contingency of 10 per cent) are Rs. 20.80 million (US$342,000). Table 2: Cost of Jarwar LARP; Gotki – Sadiqabad Transmission Line
No. Resettlement Activity Total Rs. A. Asset Compensation 14,171,296 B. Other Resettlement Activities (TA, M&E) 2,273,560 C. Administration Costs (15%) 2,466,728 D. Subtotal (A+B+C) 18,911,584 E. Contingency (10%) 1,891,158 Total Amount (Rs) 20,802,743 Total Amount (US Dollars*) 341,588.55
* US$ 1.00 = Rs. 60.90.
LARP Jarwar–Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 Page iii
Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Introduction
1.1 Background
1. The Government of Pakistan has requested financing from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) for implementing the Power Transmission Enhancement Investment Program (the program) to be executed through a Multi-tranche Financial Facility (MFF) divided into four tranches and with the Ministry of Water and Power, and the National Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC) as the Executing Agency (EA) and the Implementing Agency (IA) respectively. Each tranche will constitute a project which, in turn, will be divided in several subprojects involving the construction/upgrade of transmission lines and stations. 2. This Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) for the new 63.83 km long Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132kV double circuit transmission line (the subproject), one of the subprojects included in tranche 2 of the MFF program, has been prepared by NTDC to fit the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework (LARF) prepared for the program as a whole. As such the subproject will have to fit the following land acquisition and resettlement (LAR)-related conditions: • The signing of contracts awards for the subproject’s civil works will be contingent to the preparation of a LARP fitting the LARF and relevant ADB policies; and, • ADB issuance of notice to proceed for the implementation of the subproject’s civil works will be contingent to the full implementation of the compensation and rehabilitation programs detailed in this LARP. 3. This LARP is based on final line alignments and tower positions and fully fits the provisions of the LARF already prepared. As required by the LAR-related conditionalities for the program the LARF has been reviewed but it was not modified as the subprojects under tranche 2 require the same LAR approach as the subprojects under tranche 1. 4. As noted in the LARF and based on ADB’s OM section F2/OP & BP (2003) when impacts are considered significant i.e. > 200 APs resettled or suffering >10% income losses, a subproject is classified as category “A” and a full LARP is to be prepared. On the other hand, when losses are minor [<200 affected people (APs) to be resettled or suffering <10% income losses], a subproject is classified as category “B” and only a short LARP is to be prepared. Although more than 200 people are affected by the subproject (180 affected households [AHs] and 2,083 APs) the magnitude of the impacts is only minor only as no AHs will experience permanent land loss or have 10% or more of productive assets affected, therefore this document has been prepared following the short resettlement plan format. 5. The following sections of this Short LARP detail: (i) the principles and eligibility/entitlement criteria for compensation or rehabilitation of AHs and APs; (ii) the LARP institutional organization; (iii) the various LARP implementation mechanisms (AH information disclosure, participation & consultation, grievance redress and monitoring); and, (iv) time schedules and budgets.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 4 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
1.2 Description of the Subproject
6. An independent power producer (IPP), the Star Power Generation Limited Company (SPC), is planning to construct a gas-powered power plant at Jarwar village, in Tehsil Dharaki, Ghotki district (Sindh province). The NTDC, under an agreement with SPC, will purchase the electricity generated there and transmit it to its existing 132kV substation at Sadiqabad in Rahimyar Khan district (Punjab), by constructing a new 63.83 km long 132 kV double circuit transmission line (the subproject). From there, the Multan Electric Power Company (MEPCO) will distribute the power in Rahimyar Khan and other southern districts of Punjab. The SPC purchased 29 ha of land for construction of Jarwar Power Plant from the landowner in April 2005. The SPC has already constructed a boundary wall around the land to protect it from encroachment. The construction works for the Power Plant are planned to commence in February 2008, and commissioning of the Power Plant is expected in June 2010. 7. The proposed Jarwar Power Plant is wholly funded by the IPP, and as such is not part of this ADB-funded subproject. The land was purchased by SPC on a voluntary sale basis for a mutually negotiated market price, and not acquired under the Land Acquisition Act (LAA). Thus, the NTDC’s LARF prepared for the program is not triggered for the Power Plant component. The already existing 132kV sub-station at Sadiqabad is likewise excluded from this subproject. The subproject includes the 63.83 km long 132kV double circuit transmission line, for which this Short LARP has been prepared. 8. The new transmission line will passes through two districts in two provinces. A 45.19 km long section will be constructed in Ghotki district (Sindh province), and the remaining 18.645 km long section will be constructed in Rahimyar Khan district (Punjab province), as shown on Figure 1. Finally, the new transmission line will traverse 62.24 km of private land and 1.58 km of Government land including barren range land, roads and canal. Some 180 AHs with a population of 2,083 APs, will be impacted by the subproject through partial loss of income resulting from removal of a 162 ha area of crops and 98 trees. In accordance with this minor (non-significant) impact a Short LARP has been prepared for this subproject. Figure 1: Location of Jarwar (Ghotki) – Sadiqabad Transmission Line
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 5 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Project Compensation and Rehabilitation Framework
9. This section compares the Pakistani laws and regulations on land acquisition and resettlement with the requirements of the ADB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement and details summarizes the main components of the policy framework prepared specifically for the project to ensure that ADB’s policy on involuntary resettlement is complied with (refer to Section 2.4).
2.1 Pakistan’s Law and Regulations on Land Acquisition and Resettlement
10. The LAA (1894), with its successive amendments, is the main law regulating land acquisition for public purpose. The LAA has been variously interpreted by local governments, and some province has augmented the LAA by issuing provincial legislations. The LAA and its Implementation Rules require that following an impacts assessment/valuation effort, land and crops are compensated in cash at market rate to titled landowners and registered land tenants/users, respectively. The LAA mandates that land valuation is to be based on the latest three years average registered land sale rates, though, in several recent cases the median rate over the past year, or even the current rates, have been applied. Due to widespread land under-valuation by the Revenue Department, current market rates are now frequently used with an added 15 per cent Compulsory Acquisition Surcharge as provided in the LAA. 11. Based on the LAA, only legal owners and tenants registered with the Land Revenue Department or possessing formal lease agreements, are eligible for compensation or livelihood support. The rights of the non-titled, are however addressed under the 1986 Punjab Jinnah Abadis for Non-proprietors in Rural Areas Act which recognize to squatters the right to receive rehabilitation in form of a replacement plot. It is to be noted that this right has been sometimes extended in practice to include some form of rehabilitation in cash or in forms different from land. Projects such as Chotiari Dam, Ghazi Barotha Hydropower, and National Highways Improvement, have awarded compensation and assistance to unregistered tenants and other forms of AH (sharecroppers/squatters). 12. It is also noted that the LAA does not automatically mandate for specific rehabilitation/assistance provisions benefiting the poor, vulnerable groups, or severely affected AHs, nor does it automatically provide for rehabilitation of income/livelihood losses or resettlement costs. This however is often done in many projects in form of ad hoc arrangements based on negotiations between a specific EA (NTDC) and the AHs. 13. As noted above, exceptions to the rule are intrinsic to the fact that the law is elastic and broadly interpreted at provincial level, depending on operational requirements, local needs, and socio-economic circumstances. Recourse is often taken to ad hoc arrangements, agreements and understandings for resettlement in difficult situations. The above is also influenced by the fact that an amendment of the LAA has been considered necessary by the Ministry of Environment. Accordingly, a National Resettlement Policy (NRP) and a Resettlement Ordinance have been drafted to broaden LAA provisions and current practices so as to widen the scope of eligibility and tightening up loopholes (i.e. regarding definitions of malpractices, cut-off dates, political influence on routing, etc.). But both these documents are still awaiting government’s approval for implementation.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 6 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
2.2 ADB’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy
14. The ADB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement is based on the following principles: • Involuntary resettlement is to be avoided or at least minimized. • Compensation must ensure the maintenance of the AHs’ pre-project living standards. • Compensation is required for any AH who as a result of a project has their access to, or use of, land restricted. • AHs should be fully informed and consulted on LAR compensation options. • AHs’ socio-cultural institutions should be supported/used as much as possible. • Compensation will be carried out with equal consideration of women and men. • Lack of formal legal land title should not be a hindrance to rehabilitation. • Particular attention should be paid to households headed by women and other vulnerable groups, such as indigenous people and ethnic minorities, and appropriate assistance should be provided to help them improve their status. • LAR should be conceived and executed as a part of the project, and the full costs of compensation should be included in project costs and benefits. • Compensation/rehabilitation assistance will be paid prior to ground leveling and demolition.
2.3 Comparison of Land Acquisition Act and ADB Resettlement Policy
15. Table 2.1 below outlines the differences between Pakistani Law and ADB policy: Table 2.1 Pakistan and ADB Land Acquisition Policies
Pakistan’s Land Acquisition Act ADB Involuntary Resettlement Policy Lack of title should not be a bar to compensation Land compensation only for titled landowners or and/or rehabilitation. Non-title-holders are to be holders of customary rights. rehabilitated. Crop losses compensation provided only to Crop compensation are provided to landowners and registered landowners and lease/sharecrop tenants sharecrop/lease tenants according to their shares (Non-registered are often deprived). whether they are registered or not Tree losses are compensated on the basis of Tree losses are compensated according to actual officially fixed rates by the Forest and Horticulture worth of affected trees based on market rates. departments Land valuation based on the median registered land Land valuation is to be based on current replacement transfer rate over the previous 3 years. (market) value. Valuation of built-up structures is based on current Structures valuation based on official rates, with market value/cost of new construction of the depreciation deducted from the structure gross value. structure Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) is the only pre- Complaints and grievances are resolved informally litigation final authority to decide disputes and through community participation in the Grievance address complaints regarding quantification and Redress Committees (GRC), local governments, assessment of compensation for the affected lands NGO and/or local-level community based and other assets organizations
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 7 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
2.4 Remedial Measures to Bridge the Gap
16. In principle, Pakistan Law and ADB Policy adhere not only to the objective of AH compensation, but also to the objective of rehabilitation. However, Pakistan law is unclear on how rehabilitation is to be achieved and in practice the provision of rehabilitation is left to ad hoc arrangements taken by local governments and specific project proponents. To clarify these issues and reconcile eventual gaps between Pakistan Law and ADB Policy, the EA prepared the LARF for the 1 program F , ensuring compensation at replacement cost of all items, the rehabilitation of informal settlers, and the provision of subsidies or allowances for AHs that may be relocated, suffer business losses, or may be severely affected.
2.5 Legislation Relevant to Land Classification
17. In terms of application of the LARF prepared for the program, identifying the type of land affected is an important step in determining eligibility for compensation for land. Jurisdiction rather than use classifies land. Rural land includes irrigated land and un-irrigated land and is governed by the Land Revenue Act (1967) which must be read in conjunction with the LAA and other legislation that may also apply, including for example the Punjab Alienation of Land Act (1900), Colonization of Government Lands Act (1912) and the various Land Reform Regulations. Rural land falls under the jurisdiction of revenue districts. 18. Land, other than rural land, is urban and including all permutations there-under such as residential, commercial, built upon and build able, and is governed by various regulations and ordinances including the People’s Local Government Ordinance (1972) for each province, Cantonments Act (1924), and Land Control Act (1952). Urban land falls under the jurisdiction of municipal and local government authorities. 19. While there are broad definitions of rural and urban land in the People’s Local Government Ordinances, such classifications are not immutable and have been, and are, changed by the Collector of Revenues and provincial governments over time. In general it is either the People’s Local Government Ordinances or the Land Revenue Act that determines the classification of land, however there are some cases where both applies and other cases where different legislation altogether can dictate jurisdiction and classification over land. Hence there is neither a universal classification nor legislation pertaining to the land that will be potentially affected under the program.
2.6 Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements for the Project
20. Land acquisition tasks under the program, and for this Jarwar- Sadiqabad subproject, will be implemented according to a compensation eligibility and entitlements framework in line with both Pakistan’s law/regulation and ADB Policy. 21. A summary entitlements matrix is included in Table 2.2 below.
1 The program’s LARF has been endorsed by NTDC and has been uploaded on ADB’s website.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 8 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 2.2: Entitlement Matrix
Affected Asset Specification Compensation Entitlements People Arable Land Access is not Farmer/Titleholder No Land compensation provided that land is rehabilitated/restored to restricted and former quality following completion of works. Compensation, in cash, for existing or all damaged crops and trees as per item below current land use Leaseholder No Land compensation provided that the land is rehabilitated/restored to will remain (registered or not) former quality following completion of works. Compensation, in cash, for unchanged all damaged crops and trees as per item below Sharecroppers Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees as per item (registered or not) below Agricultural Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees as per item workers below Squatters Compensation, in cash, for all damaged crops/trees as per item below Land for land compensation with plots of equal value and productivity to the plots lost; or cash for affected land at replacement cost based on Farmer/Titleholder market value plus 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge and free of taxes, registration, and transfer costs All adverse Renewal of lease in plots of equal value/productivity of plots lost, or Cash Leaseholder effects on land equivalent to market value of gross yield of affected land for the remaining (registered or not) use lease years (up to a maximum of 3 years). independent of Sharecroppers Cash compensation equal to market value of lost harvest share once severity of (temporary impact) or twice (permanent impact) impact (registered or not) Arable Land Agricultural Cash indemnity equal to salary (including portions in kind) for remaining where access workers part of agricultural year. is restricted 1 rehabilitation allowance equal to market value of 1 gross harvest and/or land Squatters (additional to crop compensation) for land use loss. use will be 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross harvest of affected Farmer/Titleholder affected land for 1 year (inclusive of winter and summer crop and Additional for Leaseholder severe impacts additional to standard crop compensation) (>10% of land loss) Sharecroppers 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of harvest share (registered or not) (additional to standard crop compensation) 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross harvest of the Squatters affected land for 1 year (inclusive of winter and summer crop and additional to standard crop compensation) Land x land through provision of plots comparable in value/location to plot Titleholder lost; or cash for affected land at full replacement cost free of taxes, Residential/ registration, transfer costs plus 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge. Commercial Renter, 1-3 months allowance Land Leaseholder Accommodation in a government resettlement area or a self-relocation Squatters allowance All relevant AHs, Cash compensation at replacement rate for affected structure/other fixed Houses and incl squatters assets free of salvaged materials, depreciation or transaction costs. For Structures partial impacts full cash assistance to restore remaining structure. All AHs, incl Crop compensation in cash at full market rate for one harvest (either squatters winter or summer) by default for impacts caused by tower bases and Crops Crops affected perimeter, stringing and access. All other crop losses will be compensated at market rates based on actual losses. All AHs, incl Trees Trees affected Cash compensation shall reflect income replacement squatters All AHs, incl Business owner: (i) Cash compensation equal to 1 year income, if loss Business loss of business squatters permanent; (ii) cash compensation for the period of business interruption, Employment or employment if loss is temporary. Worker/employee: lost wages indemnity for the business interruption period up to a 3 months maximum. Transport, All AHs so Provision of sufficient allowance to cover transport expenses and Relocation transition costs affected livelihood expenses for one month. Rehabilitation/substitution of affected structures/utilities (i.e. mosques, Community roads, schools etc. AH below poverty Vulnerable AH Employment priority in project-related jobs. line
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 9 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
2.7 Eligibility
22. The AHs entitled to compensation and/or rehabilitation provisions under the program are: • All AHs affected by restricted access to, or use of, land whether they have legal title/traditional land rights or not; • Tenants and sharecroppers whether registered or not; • Owners of buildings, crops, plants, or other objects attached to the land; and • AHs losing business, income, and salaries. 23. Compensation eligibility will be limited by a cut-off date to be set for each subproject on the last date of the Resettlement Field Surveys (RFS). AHs who settle in the affected areas after the cut-off date will not be eligible for compensation. They will, however, be given sufficient advance notice, requested to vacate premises and dismantle affected structures prior to project implementation. Their dismantled structures will not be confiscated and they will not pay any fine or sanction. Forced eviction will only be considered after all other efforts are exhausted. 24. Cut-off Date: Compensation eligibility will be limited by a cut-off date fixed by NTDC for this subproject the cut-off date is 18th August 2007, which was the last day of the RFS. As stated in paragraph 23 above, AHs who settle in the affected areas and/or make changes in land use patterns after this cut-off date will not be eligible for compensation. However, they will be served sufficiently advance notices to vacate the land at their own expense. Forced eviction will be the last option after all efforts are exhausted.
2.8 Strategy for Compensation of Land Affected by Towers
25. Besides the amended LAA, the NTDC has adopted the Telegraph Act (1885) (as amended) for the construction and maintenance of power transmission lines. The latter Act was originally framed for the construction of telegraphic poles during the British Era and later inherited by Pakistan upon independence. This Act was subsequently adopted by WAPDA for electric poles and supply lines, and eventually passed to NTDC. However, telegraphic or electric poles cover a much smaller area of land compared with transmission towers which have the potential to affect crops and grazing shrubs. The NTDC makes utmost efforts to minimize resettlement impacts, alternatively NTDC compensates affected farmers for their crop losses. 26. Thus, based on current Pakistani Law and NTDC’s practice, the land under the towers is not acquired permanently and therefore compensation is not required for land. For this Program, however, it was agreed between NTDC and ADB that the land under the tower will be acquired but would only require compensation in the case where (i) in rural areas, the tower hinders access to the land under the tower for cultivation; and/or, (ii) in urban/residential areas, the tower restricts use of the land for housing development. Based on this principle it was established that the strategy for compensation of land affected by tower construction will be different for urban/residential land (and its potential for housing development) and agricultural land. In the case of urban/residential areas, the land under towers will be considered as being permanently affected and therefore it will be acquired and compensated in full. In the case of rural areas and agricultural land, as long as the towers provide sufficient clearance to allow the continuation of crop cultivation, the
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 10 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
land will be considered to be temporarily affected (for the duration of tower installation and stringing of the lines) and therefore will not be acquired nor compensated. However, for towers with low-bars which would restrict the farmer’s access for cultivation activities, the land will be acquired permanently and compensated accordingly. 27. The construction of towers on agricultural land however will still require the provision of compensation for crops and loss of trees, for the area under the tower plus a small perimeter surrounding it (an access and working area). The area included in the perimeter has been assessed as 900 m2 for 220 kV towers and 2,500 m2 for 500 kV towers. Furthermore, as the construction of towers involves a 3-tier process, namely: (i) preparation of the foundation; (ii) erection of the tower; and, (iii) stringing of the power cables, and this process has the potential to affect three crops, and thus, compensation for three crops will be paid to the affected farmers.
2.9 Compensation Entitlements
28. Entitlement provisions for AHs cover such impacts as land losses, house and buildings losses, crops and trees losses, a relocation subsidy, rehabilitation measures, and a business losses allowance based on tax declarations and/or lump sums. These entitlements are detailed below: • Agricultural land impacts will be compensated based on whether an AH’s access to, or use of, their land is restricted. For AHs whose access to, and use of, agricultural land is not restricted i.e. they can continue to cultivate the land, compensation will be for removed or damaged crops and trees. For AHs whose access to, or use of, agricultural land is restricted i.e. they cannot continue to cultivate the land, compensation will be at replacement value in: (i) cash at current market rates plus a 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge (CAS), or (ii) through replacement land equal in value/productivity to the plot lost. When >10% of an AH’s income or agricultural land is affected, AHs (owners, leaseholders and sharecroppers) will get an additional allowance for severe impacts equal to the market value of a year’s gross yield of the land lost (inclusive of winter and summer harvest). Eventual transaction taxes/fees will either be paid by NTDC or waived by local governments. Market rates will be assessed through a survey of prevalent land prices, carried out by local government financing institutions. • Residential/commercial land will be compensated at replacement value by either (i) land for land, or (ii) cash at current market rates free of any deductions. Renters/leaseholders will receive an allowance corresponding to 3 months’ rent. • Houses, buildings, structures will be compensated in cash at replacement cost free of depreciation, salvaged materials, and transaction costs deductions. The compensation for houses/buildings will include the cost of lost water and electricity connections. • Crops: Cash compensation at current market rates for the net harvest actually lost being as it may the winter, the summer crop, or both. Crop compensation will be paid both to landowners and tenants based on their specific sharecropping agreements. • Trees: Cash compensation shall reflect income replacement (see Section 2.10).
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 11 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
• Businesses: compensation for permanent business losses will be in cash for a 1-year income based on tax declaration or, if unavailable, based on the official minimum salary; compensation for temporary business will be cash for the period of income interruption based on tax declaration or, if unavailable, official minimum salary. • Business workers and employees: Indemnity for lost wages for the period of business interruption up to a maximum of 3 months. • Agricultural land leaseholders, sharecroppers, and workers: Where the access to, or use of, the land is restricted; affected leaseholders will receive either a renewal of the lease in other plots or cash corresponding to the yearly yield of land lost for remaining years of the lease up to a maximum of 3 years. Sharecroppers will receive their share of harvest at market rates (if impact is temporary) or if the land is lost permanently additional compensation for 1 crop. Agricultural workers, with contracts interrupted, will get an indemnity in cash corresponding to their salary in cash and kind for the remaining part of the agricultural year (inclusive of both winter and summer crop). • Relocation subsidy: AHs forced to relocate will receive a relocation subsidy sufficient to cover transport costs and living expenses for 1 month. • House renters: House renters who have leased a house for residential purposes will be provided with a cash grant of 3 months’ rent at the prevailing market rate in the area and will be assisted in identifying alternative accommodation. • Community structures and public utilities: Will be fully replaced or rehabilitated so as to satisfy their pre-project functions. • Vulnerable people livelihood: Vulnerable people (AHs below the poverty line) will be given priority in employment in project-related jobs.
2.10 Assessment of Compensation Unit Values
29. The methodology for assessing unit compensation values is as follows: • Land to be valued at replacement cost based on land sales survey during the year before the impact survey. No deductions for taxes/transaction costs will be applied. • Houses/buildings will be valued at replacement value based on cost of materials, type of construction, labor, transport and other construction costs. No deductions will be applied for depreciation, salvaged materials and transaction costs. • Annual crops will be valued at net market rates at the farm gate for the first year crop. In the eventuality that more than one-year compensation is due to the AHs the crops after the first will be compensated at gross market value. • Fruit trees will be valued based on age category (a. seedling; b. not yet productive; c. productive). Productive trees will be valued at gross market value of one year income multiplied by the number of years needed to grow a new tree with the productive potential of the lost tree.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 12 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Assessment of Impacts
3.1 Introduction
3.1.1 Resettlement Surveys
30. As a general strategy, the identification and layout of the site and a technical drawing showing line profile with complete tower spotting have been made as pre-requisites for carrying out the resettlement surveys. The resettlement survey involved impact assessment by quantifying and costing the affected lands and other assets (crops, trees, etc.) through a participatory approach, socio- economic data on AHs, and consultation with the men and women of AHs and 2 the affected communities. F 31. The resettlement survey team, comprising one resettlement specialist, two male and two female field surveyors, along with the technical surveyor conducted the fieldwork in the subproject area between 5th and 18th August 2007. Thus, the 18th August 2007 has been fixed as the cut-off-date for this subproject. No subsequent changes made in land use pattern or construction of any structure will be entertained for any compensation or assistance under this subproject.
3.1.2 Minimization of Impacts
32. The NTDC usually takes all possible steps to safeguard against and minimize the likely adverse impacts on the local communities in the design and implementation of its power transmission enhancement subprojects, involving construction of substations and transmission lines. Accordingly, the following specific actions were undertaken to avoid and minimize the likely resettlement impacts of this subproject: • The alignment of the transmission line was altered slightly at a number of places to avoid both the compact housing areas, scattered farm- houses, two fruit orchards, and one brick kiln; • Where the structures could not be avoided the design of tower/s was modified to angular or taller to provide safer distance or vertical clearance to the structures. This was done in five tower locations; and • While the terminal tower (T- 297) adjacent to the 132kV sub-station in Sadiqabad will be located in the road right-of-way on government land the power cables will pass over a poultry farm. The height of the tower has been raised by 2m to provide safe clearance and to avoid impacts on the poultry farm. 33. As a result, no buildings or farming enterprises (i.e., poultry farms, fruit orchards, or ancillary infrastructure such as tube-wells) are affected. The transmission line traverses private agricultural land (and some areas of un-productive or abandoned lands) and unused government land.
2 Socio-economic survey findings are presented in Section 4 and Consultations and Disclosure in Section 6.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 13 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
3.2 Impacts of the Power Plant and Substation
34. As stated earlier, neither of these components are included in this ADB-funded subproject. The land for the Power Plant has been purchased by SPC on voluntary sale basis from the landowner, and thus, the NTDC’s LARF is not triggered. The substation is already existing and no additional land is required for the connection to the new transmission line.
3.3 Impacts of the Transmission Line
3.3.1 General Description
35. As specified in Section 2, the strategy for the compensation of land affected by tower construction will be different for urban/residential land and rural (agricultural) land. In the case of urban or residential land the land under the tower will be considered as being permanently affected and therefore it will be acquired and compensated in full. In the case of agricultural land, as long as towers provide sufficient clearance to allow crop cultivation, the land will be considered as temporarily affected and therefore will not be acquired nor compensated. The construction of towers on agricultural land will require compensation for crops lost from the area under the tower and also in a small perimeter surrounding it. The area included in this perimeter has been assessed to be 2,500 m2 for a 500 kV tower. Finally, transmission line construction will also permanently affect all houses/structures and trees higher than 6 m both under and between towers within a 30 m corridor as this corridor needs to be cleared for safety reasons. Such houses, structures, and trees will be compensated. Crop cultivation within the corridor can continue after the stringing of lines has taken place. During stringing operations it is expected that one harvest will be lost. 36. The subproject includes the construction of a 63.8 km long 132 kV transmission line. The new transmission line will mostly traverse private farmland (84%) and some government owned and private uncultivated lands (15%) including barren range lands with small thorny bushes, highway right-of-way, railway track, canals and a drain (see Table 3.1). No land will be acquired permanently for the transmission line. However, its construction and stringing works will affect private seasonal crops temporarily and all the trees falling within the 30m wide corridor will be removed permanently (see Appendix 1: Working Tables).
Table 3.1: Length of Transmission Line by Type of Land Traversed
Length of Line by Type of Land (m) Transmission Line Cultivated Land Uncultivated % Total Length (Private) (Govt+Pvt) (A) Ghotki 36,518.66 8,680.69 45,199.35 70.8 (B) Rahimyar Khan 17,475.34 1,159.00 18,634.34 29.2 Total: 53,994.00 9,839.69 63,833.69 100.0 % 84.6 15.4 100.0 --
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 14 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
37. Major crops grown in the area are wheat in the Rabi season (winter-spring) and cotton and rice in the Kharif season (summer-autumn). This dominant cropping pattern of wheat-rice/cotton rotation covers 94% of the temporarily affected farmland, while sugarcane, maize/fodder and vegetables are grown on the remaining affected land (6%). Thus, the subproject’s impact assessment has been made on the basis of loss of cotton, rice and wheat crop losses. In addition, there are two large fruit orchards, which were avoided in the technical design. However, some individual and scattered fruit and wood trees will require removal. 38. The transmission line for this subproject consists of Section A in Ghotki district (Sindh Province) this section of line is 45.19 km long and includes 210 towers, and Section B in Rahimyar Khan district (Punjab Province) this section of line is 18.63 km and includes 87 towers.
3.3.2 Impacts of the Towers
39. The new 132kV transmission line will require the construction of a total 297 towers. No private or public land will be acquired permanently as none of the towers will be constructed in an established urban or a developing housing area, and access under the tower will be maintained because the towers provide sufficient clearance for the unhindered use of tractors and other agricultural equipment to allow affected farmers continued and unencumbered cultivation of their land. 40. The farmland under and around towers will, however, be affected temporarily by the loss of crops and trees during a 3-tier process of tower construction including: (i) construction of foundations, (ii) erection of towers, and (iii) stringing of power cables. The whole process is usually completed in a period of 12 to 18 months, thereby causing crop losses for up to three cropping seasons. Accordingly, cash compensation will be paid to the affected farmers or the loss of agricultural crops for three seasons. 41. Of the total 297 towers, 256 towers will be located on private farmland and the remaining 41 towers will be located on uncultivated government or private land. For tower installation, crops and trees on an area not only under the tower, but also in a small perimeter surrounding it will be temporarily required as the access, working and storage areas, and will be affected by the construction works. This area is assessed at an average size of 900 m2 (0.09 ha) per tower. Thus, the 297 towers will temporarily require a total area of 267,300 m2 (26.73 ha), the 256 towers will affect 230,400 m2 (23.04 ha) of private farmland, and the 41 towers to be constructed on uncultivated land will affect some 36,900 m2 (3.69ha). A total of 140 AHs will be temporarily affected by the construction of the 256 towers on private land, there are no AHs or APs affected by the construction of the 41 towers on uncultivated land (refer to Table 3.2). Table 3.2: Resettlement Impacts of Towers on Private Farmland
No. of Affected Area Transmission Line No. of AHs Towers m2 ha (A) Ghotki 86 172 154,800 15.48 (B) Rahimyar Khan 54 84 75,600 7.56 Totals: 140 256 230,400 23.04
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 15 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
3.3.4 Impacts of the Line
42. The transmission line will cause damage or loss of crops on farmland during the stringing of the power cables. This activity is usually carried out rapidly one stretch at a time and can be completed during one cropping season, for which one-crop compensation will be paid to AHs. No crop compensation will be paid for the line reaches traversing over uncultivated and/or unused land, whether private or public. Cash compensation will also be paid to AHs for the loss or removal of their trees falling within 30m wide transmission line Corridor of the transmission line. No built-up structures (including private houses, farm-houses, shops, and community buildings, graveyards, etc.) will be affected by this Subproject, and thus, no compensation and/or financial assistance will need to be paid to anybody in the Subproject area. 43. Tables 3.3 - 3.5 show the total of length of the transmission line corridor (excluding lands under the towers) is 46.2 km, with a total affected area of 44.87 ha. Of the total length of transmission line 44.8 km (83%) will traverse private farmland while 8.7 km (16%) will traverse uncultivated government or private land. As a result, 180 AHs will be affected temporarily solely by stringing of the transmission line and will be compensated for one-crop and the loss of trees, of these 180 AHs 140 will also be affected by the towers and will be compensated for three crops. Table 3.3: Transmission Line Corridor*by Type of Land
Length of Transmission Line (m) Affected Area (m2) Transmission Line Private Uncultivated Private Uncultivated Farmland Govt/Pvt Land Farmland Govt Land (A) Ghotki 31,265.38 7,633.97 937,961.50 229,019.00 (B) Rahimyar Khan 14,955.00 1,069.00 448,660.00 32,070.00 Total: 46,220.38 8,702.97 448,660.00 32,070.00
* The 30m wide strip of land falling in-between Towers (excl. 900m2 plots under each Tower).
Table 3.4: Impacts of Transmission Line on Private Farmland
Number of Total Length Affected Area Transmission Line AHs (m) m2 ha (A) Ghotki 99 31,265.38 937961.40 93.8 (B) Rahimyar Khan 81 14,955.00 448650.00 44.87 Total: 180 46,220.38 1386611.40 138.66
Table 3.5: Total Area of Affected Crops by Type of Land
Affected Crops (ha) Transmission Line Private Land Government Land Total Tower Corridor Total Tower Corridor (A) Ghotki 109.28 15.48 93.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 (B) Rahimyar Khan 52.43 7.56 44.87 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total: 162 23.04 138.66 0.0 0.0 0.0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 16 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
3.3.4 Other Impacts and Impacts Summary
44. In addition to crop loss, private trees will be affected and removed from the 30m wide corridor of the transmission line. Some 64 AHs (30%) will lose 98 trees (22 fruit trees and 76 wood trees). The fruit trees species include date palm and mango, and wood/timber tree species includes Shisham (sisso), Kikar, eucalyptus, Toot (mulberry) and poplar (refer to Table 3.6).
Table 3.6: Affected Fruit and Wood Trees
Number of Affected Trees by Section of Line Type of Affected Tree Total Section A Section B Date Palm 10 6 4 Fruit Mango 12 8 4 Sub-Total (a): Fruit Trees 22 14 8 Shisham/Sisso 41 31 10 Sirin/Albizia 2 2 - Wood* Kikar/Acasia 16 15 1 Toot/Mulberry 6 6 - Poplar/Eucalypt 11 8 3 Sub-Total (b): Wood Trees 76 62 14 Total: 98 76 22
45. All the affected trees are individuals or small clusters usually located along field boundaries. No plantations or fruit orchards will be affected. Minor realignments of the line have meant avoiding impacts on two fruit orchards. 46. Of the 98 trees, 57 trees will be affected by the transmission line, while 41 of the trees will be affected by construction of the towers. Compensation for affected trees will be paid once on their initial removal. 47. The compensation for fruit trees is assessed on the basis current market price of average fruit production for the number of years required for fruiting maturity of the respective fruit trees. The affected fruit trees (date palms and mango) have an average maturity period of 10 years, and accordingly the compensation will be paid for fruit produced in 10 years. Affected wood trees will be compensated based on current market rate of the timber. 48. The subproject will not incur any other impacts. No houses, structures or community property resources (land, structures, etc.) will be affected within the 30m wide corridor of the new 132kV transmission line. Similarly there are no impacts on business activities.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 17 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
3.4 Impacts on Affected Households
3.4.1 General
49. Overall, a total of 180 farming households will be affected by the construction of the new 132kV transmission line. Of the AHs, 140 AHs will be affected by both towers and transmission line, while the remaining 40 AHs will be affected by the stringing of the line only (Table 3.7). Accordingly, 140 AHs will be compensated for the loss of three crops (two crops during construction and erection of the towers plus for a third crop during the stringing of the line). The 40 AHs who will experience crop damage or loss because of the stringing activity only will receive compensation for one crop.
Table 3.7: Affected Households by Impacts
Number of AHs
Towers + Transmission Line Length (km) Total No. of Transmission transmission Total Towers line only line (A) Ghotki 31,265.38 172 86 13 99 (B) Rahimyar Khan 14,955.00 84 54 27 81 Total: 46,220.38 256 140 40 180 % - - 78 22 100.0
(Note: This table excludes 41 towers on unused private/government lands)
3.4.2 Significance of Impacts
50. The impact of loss of crops will be minor (non-significant) on all 180 AHs, the AHs have relatively large farms of highly fertile land, and none of the AHs will lose >10% of their total crop income (Table 3.8). 51. The 30m wide strip of land will be acquired temporarily as a working corridor for installation of the new towers and stringing of the power lines. The transmission line and towers will affect only agricultural crops and trees, and none of the AHs will be impacted by restricted access to, or use of, their farmland. A total of 162 ha of cotton, rice and/or wheat crop will be affected, the overall impact of this loss will be minor (average loss of 6.8% and a range from 1.6% to 9.2%) and remains consistently below 10% for all AHs. Table 3.8: Proportion of Crop Loss of Affected Households
Section of Line Percentage of Crop Loss (%) No. AHs Minimum Maximum Average (A) Ghotki 99 1.64 9.23 6.73 (B) Rahimyar Khan 81 2.16 8.88 7.14 Total 180 1.64 9.23 6.86
52. As noted in Section 4, there are no vulnerable people among the 180 AHs, as incomes of the AHs place them above the national poverty line (as described in Section 4) and most live in a joint/extended family system which serves as a safety net against external economic shocks. Finally, the overall impacts on the local communities will be negligible to minor.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 18 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Socio-Economic Profile of Affected People
4.1 Census of Affected Households
4.1.1 Field Methodology
53. The field methodology included carrying out Resettlement Field Surveys, including a 100% Census of AHs, accompanied by community consultation (refer to Section 6). The survey was undertaken between 5th and 18th August 2007. The survey included questions about the socio-economic characteristics of AHs in order to obtain necessary information about their livelihoods and conditions. It should be noted that the following discussion provides information about AHs, as well as individuals within the AHs i.e. the APs.
4.1.2 General Information on Affected Households
54. The transmission line is located in two Districts of Punjab and Sindh provinces. There are 180 AHs with a total population of 2,083 affected people (APs) impacted either by temporary land disturbance and losses or crops and trees. The numbers of AHs impacted by the various activities and the assessment of those impacts has already been provided in Section 3. All participants in the RFS were the head of household. All AHs are Muslim and ethnically Sindhi (55%) and Punjabi (45%). The language of all AHs is Sindhi in Ghotki and Siraiki in Rahimyar Khan. Table 4.1: Affected Households & Population by Location
District No. of AHs Total AP population
Ghotki 99 1,229
Rahimyar Khan 81 854
Total 180 2,083
55. In terms of social ethnic groups, there are four major castes in the Sindh province including Chachar, Laghari, Jam and Syed, and three major castes in the Punjab province including Chaudhry, Malik and Arain. Table 4.2: Social Group of Affected Households
District/ Province Social group (%) Chachar Laghari Jam Syed Others Ghotki / Sindh 26 22 18 11 23 Choudhry Malik Aryen Others - R. Y. Khan / Punjab 28 23 16 33 0
4.1.3 Indigenous People
56. None of the AHs are tribal or minority and all land is held in private ownership (i.e. no tribal or communal ownership). Therefore the standard provisions of the LARF and this LARP are sufficient to ensure an effective compensation process, and the requirements of ADB Policy on Indigenous People are fully complied
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 19 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
with. The ADB’s policy, as specified in the Indigenous Peoples Development Framework (IPDF) prepared for the project is not triggered, and therefore neither an IPDP nor special action is required for this subproject.
4.2 Data on Heads of Affected Households
57. All heads of household are male, 176 out of 180 (98%) are married and 4 out of 180 (2%) are widowed. For all married household heads, the spouse lives in the same household (i.e. none are separated). In terms of age of household head, nearly two-thirds (62%) are aged between 41 and 60, and a third are aged between 61 and 75 years old, while a small population (6%) are young being aged between 36 and 40 years. There are no elderly heads of household (older than 75 years). 58. In terms of literacy and education, overall, 93% of the household heads are literate. Some 28% of household heads have a primary education and 13% have a secondary education, and only a small proportion (4%) has attained higher education (including vocational, business or teachers training college).
4.3 Data on Affected Households
4.3.1 General Data
59. Households in the subproject area are large, with an average size of 12 people per household, indicating a dominant trend towards joint and extended family system. The smallest household is made up of five people while the largest household consists of 31 people. Tables 4.2 to 4.5 provide details on household size, and their age and gender compositions. As seen in Table 4.4, adult APs account for 62% per cent of the total AP population, and children and youth account for 38%. There are slightly more females (532%) than males in the AP population. Table 4.3: Average Size of Affected Households
Household size (No. of APs) District No. of AHs Minimum Maximum Average Ghotki 99 5 31 12 Rahimyar Khan 81 5 28 10 Total 180 5 31 12
Table 4.4: Gender Composition of Affected Households
No. of APs District No. of AHs Male APs Female APs Total Ghotki 99 588 634 1,222 Rahimyar Khan 81 421 440 861 Total 180 1,009 1,074 2,083
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 20 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 4.5: Age and Gender Composition of Households
No. of APs Age Group Age Group Male APs Female APs Total APs % Children Up to 15 283 298 581 28.0 Youth 16 – 25 181 203 384 18.4 Adults 26 – 70 524 546 1,070 51.4 Elderly 70+ 21 27 48 2.3
Total 1,009 1,074 2,083 100.0
60. In terms of housing, none of the AHs live in simple dwellings (constructed of thatch, sack, bamboo, clay or earth). All respondents stated that they live in houses constructed of brick and concrete, and some even large concrete houses. The observations made during the field surveys also verified that AHs are non-poor.
4.3.2 Livelihood and Incomes
61. As all AHs rely on farming for at least part of their income, the tenure of agricultural land is an important factor in terms of security and sustainability of livelihood. Most of the AHs are the registered owners of the land they farm. There are eight sharecroppers, no households that rent or lease agricultural land, no households that claim ownership, and no squatters. The following Table 4.6 shows that the total farm size of almost AHs is relatively large, with an average of 13.1 ha and a range from the smallest farm of 1.2 ha to the largest farm of 73 ha. Farms are larger in Ghotki. Table 4.6: Farm Size of Affected Households
No. of Farm Size (ha) District AHs Minimum Maximum Average Ghotki 99 1.5 73 16.47 Rahimyar Khan 81 1.2 35 9.07 Total 180 1.2 73 13.14
62. According to Table 4.7, overall 79% of APs working for income are male and 21% are female. Agriculture accounts for the largest proportion of livelihoods of AHs (68%) followed by waged employment (19%) and business (13%). 63. As noted above, agriculture is the main livelihood of most APs and accounts for more than two-thirds of APs working for income. Male APs dominate in each of the sectors the agriculture (88%), small business sector (64%) and waged employment (61%).
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 21 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 4.7: Involvement of APs by Gender in Income Sectors
Income No. of APs % Sector Male APs Female APs Total APs Agriculture 218 27 245 68.4 Business 29 16 45 12.5 Employment 42 26 68 18.9 Total: 289 69 358 100.00 Gender (%) 78.7 21.3 100.00 --
64. As shown in Table 4.8, in respect of proportion of income generated in the sectors, 7.7% of income is derived from waged employment, 8.6% of AH income is derived from small business while the major share (84%) is derived from agriculture. The income of women accounts for 31% of income from waged employment while their share of income from agriculture and small business activity is 16% of each sector.
Table 4.8: Sector-Wise Average Incomes by Gender
Average Income by Gender (Rs. 000) Sector % Men Women Total Agriculture 26,781 4,225 27,203 83.65 Business 2,361 448 2,809 8.64 Employment 1,741 767.4 2508 7.71 Total: 30,883 1,637 32,521 100.00 Gender (%) 94.9 5.04 100.00 ---
4.3.3 Poverty Levels
65. The poverty line is defined as 849 Rs per person per month in Pakistan, based on the data provided in the survey and census there are no households that fall on or below the poverty line. Average per capita monthly incomes are Rs 1,161, even the minimum per capita monthly income of 853 Rs/person/month is above the poverty line. The maximum income is 3,548 Rs/person/month. Table 4.9: Monthly Per Capita Income in Affected Households
Monthly Per Capita Income (Rs.) No. of AHs District Minimum Maximum Average Ghotki 99 853 3,548 1,257 Rahimyar Khan 81 880 1,568 1,006 Total 180 853 3,548 1,161
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 22 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
4.3.4 Literacy
66. Table 4.9 shows an overall literacy rate of APs of 41.4% per cent, with literacy amongst male APs (61.4%) being much higher than the literacy rate of female APs (22.6%). Table 4.9: Literacy by Age and Gender of APs
Total APs Literacy Level Male Female Total Total Number: 1009 1074 2083 Literate Persons (No.) 620 243 863 Illiterate Persons (No.) 389 831 1210 Literacy Rate (%) 61.43 22.58 41.43
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 23 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Institutional Arrangements
67. The compensation and rehabilitation program described in this LARP involves a number of agencies including; NTDC as the implementing agency, the Punjab and Sindh Boards of Revenue, the Ministry of Environment, NGOs, Provincial Governments of Sindh and Punjab, and the district governments of Ghotki and Rahimyar Khan, as detailed below.
Figure 5.1 LAR Organogram and Actions
Environmental Protection Ag.
LAR STEERING COMMITTEE LOCAL GOVERNMENT
PROVINCE NTDC
Board of revenue Other Departments
Land compensation PMU
District Nazim District Coordination Office (DCO) District Departments PIU - Land Acquisition Collector(LAC)
Thesil Nazim
Other Compensation LAR COORDINATION COMMITTEE Union Councils
Complaints and Grievances
Administrative Function AH Coordination function
Finance Direction
5.1 National Transmission and Dispatch Company
68. NTDC has overall responsibility for the preparation, implementation and financing of all tasks set out in this LARP as well as inter-agency co-ordination. NTDC will exercise its functions through a centrally based Project Management Unit (PMU) which will be responsible for general project execution, and at subproject level through Project Implementation Units (PIUs) which will be tasked with day-to-day project activities.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 24 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
69. Within the PMU, LARP tasks will be managed by a specific group; the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Unit (LARU), which will update this LARP (including surveys, asset valuation, community consultation, and approvals), and internally monitor LARP implementation. 70. In the implementation of these tasks the LARU will receive specific technical assistance from: • Resettlement specialists under the design and supervision consultants, who will assist in land acquisition planning/implementation, internal monitoring, and in training NTDC and district governments on impact assessment and ADB policy/LARF requirements; • An impact assessment/valuation team hired as required to assist in on- site preparation of surveys, base-line information gathering and AH consultation; and • An external monitoring agency (EMA) hired to conduct periodic monitoring and third party validation of LARP implementation (see Section 5.4).
5.2 District Government
71. District governments have jurisdiction for land administration, valuation, and acquisition. At the provincial level these functions rest with the Board of Revenue while at district level they rest with the District Collector Office (DCO) and the Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) within the DCO. A number of minor agents, most notably the Patwari, (the keeper of land records), carry out specific roles such as titles identification and verification (see Figure 5.2). Functions pertaining to compensation of assets different from land (i.e. buildings, crops and trees) or income rehabilitation also fall on local governments, more specifically on the relevant District Department. Figure 5.2: Organization of District Land Acquisition Collector Office
EDO-R / LAC Executive District Officer (Revenue) (Land Acquisition Collector)
Tesildar / Naib Tehsildar Land Acquisition Officers (LAO) [Tehsil (Sub-District) Land Records Officer]
Girdawar / Qanungo Land Surveyor (In-Charge, Land Records)
Patwari Assistant Land Surveyor (Land Records Clerks)
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 25 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
5.3 Other Agencies and Institutions
72. As various agencies will need to be carefully coordinated so as to obtain effective, smooth and timely LARP implementation, a land acquisition steering committee (LASC) will be directly assigned to NTDC-PMU by the Boards of Revenue and district level coordination committees. An LASC will be established at provincial levels in both Punjab and Sindh covering the sections of line in their respective areas, the LASC will include NTDC’s General Manager; Provincial Chairman of Planning and Development Department, or Additional Chief Secretary; Chairman of Board of Revenue; Director General EPA; and, Project Director (PD) NTDC-PMU (Figure 5.3). 73. The LASC will meet periodically to ensure proper and timely formation of the district level co-ordination committees to facilitate the LARP approval and implementation processes.
Figure 5.3: Organization of Land Acquisition Steering Committee
Project Director PMU, NTDC
Chairman, P&DD / Chairman, Provincial Additional Chief Provincial Board of Director General, Project Director, Secretary Revenue EPA PMU, NTDC (Principle Member) (Member) (Member) (Member-Secretary)
74. A Land Acquisition Coordination Committee (LACC) will be formed in Ghotki and Rahimyar Khan Town to assist with the updating and implementation of the LARP (in particular execution of surveys, valuation of assets, AH consultation, and local approval of LARP provisions). The committee formation will be initiated by the NTDC-PMU and will include representatives of PIUs, LARU, Tehsildars of the concerned districts, Naib Zilla Nazims, and Union Council Nazims representing the AHs (Figure 5.4). 75. One of the areas where LCC functions will be to offer the affected communities with a channel and a support group for addressing complaints and grievances. In this function the LCC will hear the complaint, and if found justified will support its lodging at the PMU, and as further described in Section 7. 76. This LARP will require review and clearance by the Sindh and Punjab Environmental Protection Agencies ,respectively, as part of Government’s Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) approval procedures, as well as approval by ADB (the division that assess compliance with safeguard policies - RSES, ADB Headquarters in Manila, Philippines).
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 26 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Figure 5.4: Organization of Land Acquisition Coordination Committee
Executive District Officer (Revenue) / Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) (Chairman)
District Officer Tehsildar Union Council Deputy Director, (Revenue) (Revenue Officer) Nazim/s PIU, NTDC (Principle Member) (Member) (Member/s) (Member-Secretary)
5.4 Responsibility for Internal and External Monitoring
77. Land acquisition tasks under the project will be subject to both internal and external monitoring. Internal monitoring will be conducted by NTDC-PMU, assisted by the design and supervision consultant. 78. External monitoring responsibilities will be assigned to an external monitoring agency (EMA), either a Consultant or non-government organization (NGO) to be 3 engaged by NTDC according to the Terms of Reference F (TOR) that have been approved by ADB. This aspect of the LARP implementation has been further elaborated in Section 10 (Monitoring and Evaluation).
3 Terms of Reference for External Monitoring are provided in Appendix 4.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 27 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Consultation and Disclosure
6.1 Consultation Undertaken for the LARP
79. The consultative process undertaken for the preparation of this LARP has included not only AHs, but representatives of local governments in the subproject area and members of local people’s organizations (e.g., CBCs, women’s organizations, peasant worker’s organizations). Special attention was paid in identification of any vulnerable groups (such as the poor, women, and elderly), in the subproject area to to ensure that their views would be considered in the formulation of the LARP. No vulnerable groups were identified. 80. Consultation with stakeholders at the different stages of the subproject is required by ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement and as provided for in the LARF. To start with, consultations with the AHs were conducted as part of inventory taking of affected lands and other assets. The communities’ and especially the AHs’ responses to the proposed subproject were found to be positive. 81. Along with the participatory DMS and socio-economic survey and interviewing of AHs, semi-structured discussions aiming at community awareness and consultations regarding the subproject’s likely impacts were also held with the small groups of men and women along the proposed transmission line. A total of nine group discussions were held with five groups of men and four groups of women in five villages along the proposed alignment. A total number of 74 people (42 men and 32 women) participated in the consultative meetings (see Table 6.1 and Appendix 2). Table 6.1: Participants in Group Discussions and Consultations
No. of Groups No. of Participants Village Men Women Total Men Women Total Goth Elahi Bux 1 1 2 8 9 17 Chak 171 1 1 1 8 0 08 Shahpur 1 1 2 10 7 17 Walana 1 1 2 9 7 16 Chak 9 NP 1 1 2 7 9 16 Total 5 5 10 42 32 74
82. The concerns raised during the consultation sessions, namely, the adequacy and timeliness of the compensation payments, and safety measures, have been addressed by NTDC through the following measures; by making payment of crop and tree compensations to all the AHs at least one month (30 days) prior to the temporary use of their farmlands (before starting the civil works), and, instructing the Contractor/s to take all possible safety measures during the entire the Subproject execution period, especially during the construction and stringing activities. Furthermore, a grievance mechanism will be established to ensure that AHs have recourse in case they are not satisfied with the process or outcomes of this LARP, once implemented, this discussed further in Section 7.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 28 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
83. The local communities’ responses (awareness, perceptions and preferences) to the Jarwar- Sadiqabad transmission line subproject and resettlement related matters are summarized as follows: • This subproject is necessary under the current local conditions; • Crop and tree compensation should be assessed fairly and paid prior to start of any works; • Where possible local skilled and unskilled labor should be used for the subproject; and • Electricity should be provided to the affected villages which are still without electricity.
6.2 Compensation Options Discussed
84. In addition to the focus group discussions and consultative meetings described above, the DMS included a questionnaire with several questions regarding AHs’ preferences for compensation and rehabilitation options. This information has been used to assist in determining the support measures required by AHs. 85. The first compensation priority of all AHs is for cash, rather than land or a combination of cash and land. When asked why they preferred cash compensation, about half of them stated the reason was to assist with daily living expenses as they will lose their livelihood in the shape of crops, while the other half of participants wanted to reinvest the money in developing the land for cultivation and/or installing private tube-wells to improve their irrigation water supply. 86. In summary, the compensation and resettlement options discussed and agreed upon during the consultation meetings included: • Relocation and assistance - not applicable; • Compensation – the majority of AH representatives look forward to receiving a “fair” and “timely” compensation for their lost/affected crops and trees. By “fair”, they meant the application of prevalent open market rates, or “replacement value” for their crop production and wood trees. By “timely”, they meant prior to the temporary use of their lands and sustaining any damage to or removal of their crops and trees, as provided for in the LARF; and • Job opportunities - the more disadvantaged people in the villages requested that NTDC assist them with job opportunities with the contractors, on a priority basis, during project implementation. 6.3 LARP Disclosure 87. An English version of the program’s LARF has already been uploaded to ADB’s website and an Urdu version has been made available through NTDC’s headquarters and PIUs in Subproject areas (second tranche). 88. In line with ADB’s public communications policy, this LARP in English will also be posted on the ADB website, while its translation in Urdu will be disclosed to the AHs at the Dera Ghazi Khan PIU office and posted on the ADB website. 89. In addition, a public information booklet in Urdu, summarizing compensation provisions will be sent to all AHs (a draft booklet in English has been prepared as provided in Appendix 3).
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 29 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
7. Grievance Redress Process
87. A grievance mechanism will be established to allow any AH appealing any disagreeable decision, practice or activity arising from land or other assets acquisition and/or compensation. AHs will be fully informed of their rights and of the procedures for addressing complaints whether verbally or in writing during consultation, survey, and time of compensation. 88. Care will always be taken to prevent grievances rather than going through a redress process. This can be achieved through careful LAR design and implementation, by ensuring full participation and consultation with the AHs, and by establishing extensive communication and coordination between the community, the PMU, the LAC and local governments in general. 89. As finances will move differently for (i) land (for land use or access impacts) and (ii) other items compensation or rehabilitation (in the first case funds will move from NTDC through the DCO to the AHs, while in the second funds will go directly from NTDC to the AHs. The complaint and grievances will be addressed through two different processes as described in Table 7.1.
Table 7.1: Grievance Resolution Process Land & Crop Compensation Issues Other Compensation or Project Issues 1. First, complaints resolution will be attempted at 1. First, complaints resolution will be attempted at village level through the involvement of the LARU, village level through the involvement of the LARU, NGO and informal mediators. NGO and informal mediators.
2. If still unsettled, a grievance can then be lodged to 2. If still unsettled, a grievance can be lodged to the the LAC who has 30 days to decide on the case. PIU/LARU, which will have 30 days to respond.
3. If no solution was reached a grievance can be 3. If no solution was reached a grievance can be lodged with support of the LCC to the PMU. The AH lodged with support of the LCC to the PMU. The AH must lodge the complaint within 1 month of lodging the must lodge the complaint within 1 month of lodging the original complaint with the LAC and must produce original complaint with the LAC and must produce documents supporting his/her claim. The PMU will documents supporting his/her claim. The PMU will provide the decision within 21 days of registering the provide the decision within 21 days of registering the complaint. The PMU decision must be in compliance complaint. The PMU decision must be in compliance with this LARF provisions. with this LARF provisions.
4. Should the grievance redress system fail to satisfy 4. Should the grievance redress system fail to satisfy the AH, they can further submit their case to the the AH, they can further submit their case to the appropriate court of law as per the process set out in appropriate court of law as per the process set out in Sections 18 to 22 of the LAA (1894). Sections 18 to 22 of the LAA (1894).
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 30 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
8. Budget for Land and Asset Acquisition
8.1 Basis for Compensation
90. Compensation for projects requiring land acquisition can often differ between the borrower and ADB (and other providers of official development assistance). To comply with ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement, rates used to compensate for lost land and assets must be at replacement values, to “at least” restore people’s livelihoods to their pre-project status and ensuring that APs are not left worse off as a result of a project. 91. According to the project’s LARF, replacement cost is the amount of cash or kind needed to replace an asset in its existing or better condition, and is the value determined as compensation for the current market price without depreciation or deduction of the costs of any transaction or for any material salvaged. The processes for establishing the rates used for this subproject followed the methodology is set out in the program’s LARF.
8.2 Determining the Rates for Compensation
92. Based on the foregoing requirements and the LARF provisions, the methodology for assessing unit compensation values of the different items is described as follows: • Basic annual crop compensation was valued at net farm-gate market rates. If additional crops compensation is due it will be calculated at market value minus inputs. As noted earlier, compensation for crops affected by tower bases and perimeters is three-crop and for stringing of the lines is for one-crop; and • Fruit trees were valued based on age and productivity category (a. seedling; b. not yet productive; c. productive). Productive fruit trees were valued at gross market value of one year’s income multiplied by the number of years needed to grow a new tree with the productive potential of the lost tree. Wood trees were valued based on type, size, and age. AHs are entitled to keep the wood (as salvaged material) without any deductions from the amount of compensation. 93. The valuation appraisal registered recent current crop and tree sales at markets and was based on AH and community consultation (including relevant local government agencies). The conclusion of the appraisal is that in most cases the actual transaction values are higher than the values officially documented and registered. The results of the appraisal are provided in the tables below.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 31 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 8.1: Average Rate/Price for Crops in Subproject Area
Affected Crop Average Net Income (Rs.)
2 No. Type of Crop Per acre Per ha Per m 1 Cotton (Kharif Season) 27,800.00 68,666.00 6.87 2 Wheat (Rabi Season) 23,400.00 57,798.00 5.78 3 Rice (Kharif Season) 29,500.00 72,865.00 7.29 Sum Total: 80,700.00 199,329.00 19.93 Average (3 Crops): 26,900.00 66,443.00 6.64 Average (Cotton/ Wheat): 25,600.00 63,232.00 6.32 Average (Rice/ Wheat): 26,450.00 65,331.50 6.53
94. In the subproject area two crops, rice and cotton, are cultivated in Kharif season while wheat is cultivated in Rabi season. For the purpose of compensation the average of the price of wheat and rice or wheat and cotton is used. The area under cultivation is shown in Table 8.2 below: Table 8.2: Area Affected by Towers and Transmission Line by Crop
Area (m2) Crops Tower Line Cotton/ Wheat 169,200 1,026,000 Rice/ Wheat 61,200 366,200
95. The appraisal also obtained the prices for the affected fruit and wood trees as described in the following four tables (Table 8.3 to 8.6).
Table 8.3: Categorization and Income Replacement of Affected Fruit Trees No. of Name of Categorization Fruit Potential for Fruiting Income Affected Maturity Age Harvests Period Annual Replacement No. Fruit Tree Level (Years) Year (Years) Income (Rs) Value (Rs.) 1 Date Immature <10 0 18 2,250 40,500 Palm Mature-1 10 - 22 1 12 2,025 24,300 Mature-2 >22 1 6 1,350 8,100 2 Mango Immature < 10 0 15 2,750 41,250 Mature-1 10 - 20 1 10 2,375 23,750 Mature-2 > 20 1 5 1,825 9,125
Table 8.4: Relative Sizes of Affected Wood Trees by Size
Name of Small Medium Large No. Wood Tree Height (m) Girth (m) Height (m) Girth (m) Height (m) Girth (m) 1 Shisham <3.8 <0.5 3.9 - 7.6 0.5 - 0.9 >7.7 > 1.0 2 Kikar <4.6 <0.3 4.6 - 9.1 0.4 - 0.5 >9.1 > 0.5 3 Eucalyptus <3.0 <0.5 3.1 - 6.1 0.5 - 0.9 >6.1 > 1.0 4 Mulberry <3.0 <0.5 3.1 - 6.1 0.5 - 0.9 >6.1 > 1.0 5 Sirin/Saras <3.8 <0.5 3.9 - 7.6 0.5 - 0.9 >7.7 > 1.0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 32 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 8.5: Number and Compensation of Affected Fruit Trees
Name of Affected Fruit Tree (No.) Compensation Total Price No. Fruit Tree Category Line A Line B Total Rate (Rs.) (Rs.) 1 Date Palm Immature 1 1 2 40,500 81,000 Mature-1 3 1 4 24,300 97,200 Mature-2 2 2 4 8,100 32,400 Sub-total (a): Date-Palm 6 4 10 - 210,600 2 Mango Immature 1 2 3 41,250 123,750 Mature-1 3 1 4 23,750 95,000 Mature-2 4 1 5 9,125 45,625 Sub-total (b): Mango 8 4 12 - 264,375 TOTAL: 14 8 22 - 474,975
Table 8.6: Number and Compensation of Affected Wood Trees
Name of Relative Affected Wood Tree (No.) Market Rate Total Price No. Wood Tree Size Line A Line B Total (Rs.) (Rs.) 1 Shisham Small 8 2 10 4,050 40,500 Medium 16 5 21 6,250 131,250 Large 7 3 10 8,500 85,000 Sub-total (a): Shisham 31 10 41 - 256,750 2 Kikar (Acasia) Small 1 0 1 3,400 3,400 Medium 3 0 3 4,850 14,550 Large 11 1 12 6,150 73,800 Sub-total (b): Kikar 15 1 16 - 91,750 3 Eucalyptus Small 2 0 2 2,450 4,900 Medium 1 0 1 4,200 4,200 Large 0 0 0 5,500 - Sub-total (c): Eucalyptus 3 0 3 - 9,100 4 Mulberry Small 1 1 2 2,250 4,500 Medium 2 0 2 4,500 9,000 Large 0 0 0 6,000 - Sub-total (d): Mulberry 3 1 4 - 13,500 5 Others Small 5 0 5 2,000 10,000 Medium 3 2 5 4,500 22,500 Large 2 0 2 6,200 12,400 Sub-total (e): Others 10 2 12 - 44,900 TOTAL: 52 12 76 - 416,000
8.3 Budget for Land and Asset Acquisition
96. This LARP includes the cost of compensation and any other assistance AHs are entitled to, with a breakdown by crops and trees, and other associated costs. The cost estimate has been based on the rates derived through consultation and appraisal (as described in Section 8.2). The rates for compensation and cash entitlements for rehabilitation as well as allowances payable to AHs will be adjusted annually, based on the actual annual inflation rate. NTDC, with the LACs, will determine the annual inflation rates and adjust all cash entitlements.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 33 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
97. Compensation for crops and trees is Rs. 14,16 million (US$232,570). The administrative charges have been estimated as 15% of the total of compensation for crops and trees, and allowances. These charges are to cover the costs of implementing the plan (producing and distributing the PIB, holding individual and group consultations and public meetings as required, verifying the RFS, revising the LARP if required (to reflect any minor changes), organizing and arranging for the compensation payments through the LACs), and internal monitoring of the plan and its implementation. 98. A contingency of 10% of the subtotal of the administrative charges has also been included in the cost estimate. 99. Funds for compensation and implementation of the LARP will be from the Government (counterpart funds) via NTDC, budgetary requirements for economic restoration, as part of resettlement budget will also come from the counterpart funds and shall be identified as allowances. The EMA will be financed as a project loan cost as a component of the project support fund. 100. As shown in Table 8.7, the total cost of LARP implementation have been estimated at Rs. 18.77 million (US$ 308,277). Table 8.4: Estimated Jarwar- Sadiqabad LARP
No. Resettlement Activity No. Unit Rs./Unit Total Rs.
A. Asset Compensation - - - 14,163,521 A.1 Trees: 98 tree - 880,975 A.1.1 Fruit Trees: 22 tree - 474,975 Date Palm 10 tree 21,060 210,600 Mango 12 tree 22,031 264,375 A.1.2 Wood Trees: 76 tree - 406,000 Shisham (sisso) 41 tree 6,262 256,750 Kikar (acasia nicolta) 16 tree 5,734 91,750 Other (Eucalyptus, Mulberry, etc.) 19 tree 3,026 57,500 A.2 Crops: - - - 13,282,546 Cotton/Wheat - Towers (x 3 Crops) 169,200 m2 6.32 3,208,032 Cotton/Wheat - TL Corridor (1 Crop) 1,026,000 m2 6.32 6,484,320 Rice/Wheat - Towers (x 3 Crops) 61,200 m2 6.53 1,198,908 Rice/Wheat - TL Corridor (1 Crop) 366,200 m2 6.53 2,391,286 B. Other Activities - - - 2,273,560 B.1 Rehabilitation of Affected Lands/Structures 1,622,600 m2 0.60 973,560 B.2 Resettlement Specialist (impl.) 3.00 pers/mo 300,000 900,000 B.3 External monitoring 1.00 pers/mo 300,000 300,000 B.4 Training of NTDC staff (incl. materials) 1.00 lumpsum 100,000 100,000 C. Administration Costs (15% of A) 0.15 lumpsum 14,163,521 2,124,528 D. Subtotal (A+B+C) - - - 18,561,609 E. Contingency (10% of C) 0.10 lumpsum 2,124,528 212,453 Total Amount (Pak. Rupees): - - - 18,774,062 Total Amount (US Dollars*): - - - 308,276.88
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 34 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
9. Implementation Schedule
101. The overall program will be implemented over a five to six year period with the first tranche of subprojects scheduled to commence upon loan approval. Implementation of resettlement and related activities will take place after the project supervision consultant has mobilized, who will work closely with, and assist, NTDC in all resettlement and related activities, as presented in Table 9.1. 102. Civil works contractors will not be issued a notice of possession of site for any section of construction works unless NTDC has (i) satisfactorily completed, in accordance with the approved LARP and all compensation payments have been made, and (ii) ensured that the rehabilitation assistance is in place and the area required for civil works is free of all encumbrances. 103. The LARP implementation schedule, shown below, envisages the following sequence of activities; some of these steps will overlap in their timing and some will be repeated throughout the project schedule.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 35 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 9.1: Implementation Schedule for Jarwar Subproject
Responsibility 2007 Year 2008 Year 2009 LARP Activity/Task Jul- Oct- Jan- Apr- Primary Secondary Comp. Sep Dec Mar Jun
LARF Disclosure - Brochure in Urdu NTDC-PMU LARU
LARF Revision (if necessary) NTDC-PMU LARU/RS
NTDC- Request Govts. for NOC/Land Transfer Govt PMU
Request to DROs for initiating process NTDC-PMU LARU/RS
Preparation Negotiations with Forest Department and Boards DRO/LAC LARU/RS of Revenue
LARP disclosure - Brochure in Urdu NTDC-PMU ADB
Site demarcation of affected Lands NTDC-PMU LARU/RS
Mobilize project supervision consultant Govt NTDC
LARP revision (if necessary) NTDC-PMU LARU/RS
Information dissemination regarding NTDC-PMU LARU/RS compensation payment & evacuation dates Submit revised LARP to EPA/ADB. LARP approval prior to Award of Contracts for civil Govt/ADB NTDC works. Adjust compensation rates & rehabilitation costs NTDC- DRO/LAC for inflation (if necessary) PMU Implementation Implementation Delivery of compensation. Payments to made DRO/LAC LARU/RS prior to the start of civil works LARP monitoring (internal, and mobilization of NTDC-PMU EMA EMA & baseline survey)
Grievance Redress Process LACC LARU/RS
Possession of land for starting works DRO/LAC PMU/NTDC
Contractor mobilized, civil works commenced Contractor Consultant
Final payment of crop compensation NTDC-PMU LARU/RS Construction Construction LARP monitoring; post-evaluation report EMA NTDC/ADB submitted
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 36 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
10. MONITORING AND EVALUATION
104. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) are critical activities in involuntary resettlement caused by various infrastructure development projects. Monitoring involves periodic checking to ascertain whether activities are progressing as per schedule while evaluation is essentially a summing up, at the end of the project, assessment of actual achievement in comparison to specified objectives. LARP implementation will be monitored both internally and externally. 105. The NTDC-PMU, through LARU, will be responsible for internal monitoring through its field office. The Resettlement Specialist will provide necessary technical assistance in implementing and monitoring the resettlement activities. In addition, a part-time Consultant will be responsible for independent external monitoring and evaluation of the resettlement activities.
10.1 Internal Monitoring
106. This Short LARP includes indicators and benchmarks for achievement of the objectives under the resettlement program, which can be categorized as follows: • Process indicators, which include project inputs, expenditures, staff deployment; • Output indicators are results in terms of numbers of affected persons compensated for their affected assets (land, crops and/or trees); and • Impact indicators related to the long-term effect of the project on people’s lives in the project-affected area. 107. The first two types of indicators, related to process and immediate outputs and results, will be monitored internally by LARU. This information will be collected from the project site and assimilated in the form of a monthly progress report to assess the progress and results of LARP implementation, and adjust the work program, where necessary, in case of any delays or problems. 108. Specific activities under LARP implementation that will be monitored are the following: • Information campaign and consultation with AHs on a continued basis; • Status of land acquisition/purchase and payments of crop and tree compensations; • Status of restoration of damaged community infrastructure (water pipelines, irrigation channels / watercourses, drains, roads, streets, etc);and • Grievances redress activities 109. The LARU will be responsible for monitoring the day-to-day resettlement activities of the subproject. The socio-economic census and land acquisition data will provide the necessary benchmark for field level monitoring, to be carried out through: • Review of IOL/Census information for all AHs; • Consultation and informal interviews with AHs;
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 37 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
• In-depth case studies; • Informal sample survey of AHs; • Key informant interviews; and • Community public meetings. 110. A performance data sheet will be developed to monitor the project at the field level. Quarterly reports will be received from the field offices and LAC/GSC will be responsible for overall project level monitoring.
10.2 External Monitoring
111. An individual consultant, consulting firm, or NGO will be engaged by NTDC on part-time basis as the EMA to carry out independent monitoring and evaluation of the LARP implementation (see TOR in Appendix 4). Independent evaluation will be undertaken on a bi-annual basis to completion of the subproject and until the end of the program. The EMA will be selected by the NTDC, with advice and concurrence of ADB. The EMA will review the status of the resettlement implementation in light of the targets, budget and schedule set out in this short LARP. The key tasks during external monitoring include: • Review and verify internal monitoring reports prepared by LARU; • Identification and selection of impact indicators; • Impact assessment through formal and informal surveys with APs; • Consultations with AHs, officials, community leaders for review report; and • Assessment of the resettlement efficiency, impact and sustainability, and drawing lessons for future resettlement policy formulation and planning.
10.3 Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation
112. The following will be considered as the basis for indicators in monitoring and evaluation of the subproject’s LARP: • Socio-economic conditions of the AHs in the post-resettlement period; • Communications and reactions from AHs on entitlements, compensation, options, alternative developments and relocation timetables etc.; • Changes in housing and income levels; • Valuation of property; • Grievance procedures; • Disbursement of compensation; and • Level of satisfaction of AHs in the post-resettlement period.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 38 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
10.4 Resettlement Database
113. All information concerning resettlement issues related to land acquisition, socio- economic information of the acquired land; inventory of crop and tree losses by individual AHs, compensation and entitlements and payments will be collected by LARU and the Consultants through their concerned field offices and computerized by LARU. This database will form the basis of information for implementation, monitoring and reporting purposes and facilitate efficient resettlement management.
10.5 Reporting Requirements
114. The LARU responsible for supervision and implementation of LARP will prepare monthly progress reports on resettlement activities and submit them to the ADB for review. The Resettlement Specialist will also monitor LARP implementation independently and submit quarterly reports to NTDC-PMU and ADB. These quarterly reports will also highlight the bottlenecks and recommend ways and means to improve such problematic situations. The EMA will submit bi-annual review reports directly to ADB and determine whether or not resettlement goals have been achieved, more importantly whether livelihoods and living standards have been restored/enhanced and suggest suitable recommendations for improvement. The EMA will also provide a copy of the same report to NTDC Headquarters for information and successive action.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 39 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Working Tables Appendix 2 – List of People Consulted for LARP Appendix 3 – Draft Public Information Brochure Appendix 4 – Terms of Reference for External Monitoring Consultant/NGO
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject Final Draft November 2007 40 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Appendix A: Working Tables
Table A-4: Crops affected by the Construction of 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
Name of Parent Crops/ Orchards (Hectares)
Total No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Area Cotton Rice
District Ghotki :
1 Abdul Razaq Goth Sathi Malik Rarki 2.99 2.99 - 2 Jam Mashook Goth Sathi Malik Rarki 1.33 1.33 - 3 Ghulam Muhammad Goth Sathi Malik Rarki 3.20 3.20 - 4 Ghulam Haider Goth Sathi Malik Rarki 2.58 2.58 - 5 Ali Shair Goth Sathi Malik Rarki 0.61 - 0.61 6 Falak Shair Goth Sathi Malik Rarki 0.71 0.71 - 7 Qazi Laghari Goth Elahi Bux Kubar 0.65 0.65 - 8 Abdul Hameed Goth Elahi Bux Kubar 1.86 1.86 - 9 Abdul Rasheed Goth Elahi Bux Kubar 0.71 0.71 - 10 Ghulam Farid Goth Elahi Bux Kubar 0.58 0.58 - 11 Sikander Ali Goth Elahi Bux Kubar 0.62 0.62 - 12 Abdul Aziz Goth Elahi Bux Kubar 1.25 1.25 - 13 Faiz Muhammad Goth Elahi Bux Kubar 0.20 - 0.20 14 Allah Dita Goth Haji Ahmad Yar Kubar 1.26 - 1.26
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 41 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Crops affected by the Construction of 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
Name of Parent Crops/ Orchards (Hectares)
Total No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Area Cotton Rice
15 Khan Muhammad Goth Haji Ahmad Yar Kubar 0.67 - 0.67 16 Muhammad Afzal Goth Haji Ahmad Yar Kubar 3.25 3.25 - 17 Abdul Rahman Goth Haji Ahmad Yar Kubar 2.73 2.73 - 18 Shah Nawaz Kubar Kubar 0.62 0.62 - 19 Muhammad Arshad Kubar Kubar 0.64 0.64 - 20 Sahibzada Kubar Kubar 0.74 0.74 - 21 Sahib Dino Kubar Kubar 0.31 - 0.31 22 Halay Khan Shar Goth Milhar Shar Barota 0.49 - 0.49 23 Dadan Khan Shar Goth Milhar Shar Barota 0.14 - 0.14 24 Milhan Shar Goth Milhar Shar Barota 0.11 - 0.11 25 Warsaway Shar Goth Warsaway Shar Barota 2.20 2.20 - 26 Hatan Shar Goth Warsaway Shar Barota 0.65 0.65 - 27 Haji Shah Shar Goth Warsaway Shar Barota 1.92 1.92 - 28 Ahmad Yar Goth Warsaway Shar Barota 0.64 0.64 - 29 Milham Shar Goth Warsaway Shar Barota 3.94 3.94 - 30 Sozal Chachar Goth Sozal Hasu 2.62 2.62 -
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 42 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Crops affected by the Construction of 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
Name of Parent Crops/ Orchards (Hectares)
Total No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Area Cotton Rice
31 Muhammad Nawz Kosh Goth Sozal Hasu 0.58 0.58 - 32 Ghulam Muhammad Chachar Rane Rati 0.20 0.20 - 33 Muhammad Nawaz Chachar Rane Rati 0.13 0.13 - 34 Eiso Chachar Rane Rati 0.58 0.58 - 35 Abdul Hamid Chachar Rane Rati 0.58 0.58 - 36 Muhammad Shaban Rane Rati 0.60 0.60 - 37 Elahi Bux Chachar Rane Rati 1.32 1.32 - 38 Allah Waraia Chachar Rane Rati 0.62 0.62 - 39 Murid Khan Chachar Rane Rati 1.59 1.59 - 40 Ali Nawaz Rati Rati 3.26 3.26 - 41 Dost Muhammad Rati Rati 3.32 3.32 - 42 Chota Gogan Rati Rati 3.98 3.98 - 43 Arbab Chachar Rati Rati 0.68 0.68 - 44 Noor Muhammad Kori Goth Qadir Bux Rati 0.60 0.60 - 45 Allah Wadhaia Goth Qadir Bux Rati 4.39 4.39 - 46 Esan Gogan Goth Qadir Bux Rati 2.57 2.57 -
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 43 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Crops affected by the Construction of 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
Name of Parent Crops/ Orchards (Hectares)
Total No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Area Cotton Rice
47 Jam Muhammad Shabani Goth Sabtain Shahpur 1.09 1.09 - 48 Shabir Goth Sabtain Shahpur 1.44 1.44 - 49 Muhammad Nazir Goth Sabtain Shahpur 0.62 0.62 - 50 Shair Khan Goth Sabtain Shahpur 1.54 1.54 - 51 Sajid Khan Chak 173 Chak 173 0.35 - 0.35 52 Shah Jahan Khan Chak 173 Chak 173 0.62 - 0.62 53 Bhutar Slahudin Khan Chak 173 Chak 173 0.22 - 0.22 54 Wariam Khan Chak 173 Chak 173 0.64 - 0.64 55 Shahid Khan Chak 173 Chak 173 0.62 - 0.62 56 Khalid Khan Chak 173 Chak 173 0.69 - 0.69 57 Zaman Khan Chak 173 Chak 173 1.39 - 1.39 58 Siraj Khan Chak 162 Chak 162 2.17 - 2.17 59 Haji Gulbar Chak 162 Chak 162 0.32 - 0.32 60 Aslam Arien Chak 162 Chak 162 1.75 - 1.75 61 Muhammad Ibrahim Goth Dargai Dandi 0.50 0.50 - 62 Dur Muhammad Goth Dargai Dandi 0.64 0.64 -
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 44 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Crops affected by the Construction of 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
Name of Parent Crops/ Orchards (Hectares)
Total No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Area Cotton Rice
63 Khadim Hussain Goth Dargai Dandi 0.17 0.17 - 64 Ghulam Yaseen Abid Goth Dargai Dandi 1.62 1.62 - 65 Mian Abdul Raof Adoja Goth Dargai Dandi 1.87 1.87 - 66 Aziz Ullah Basti Mehar Azem Dandi 0.70 0.70 - 67 Hashim Basti Mehar Azem Dandi 0.22 0.22 - 68 Maqsood Basti Mehar Azem Dandi 0.59 0.59 - 69 Akram Basti Mehar Azem Dandi 0.20 0.20 - 70 Muhammad Afzal Basti Mehar Azem Dandi 0.97 0.97 - 71 Bhoral Shah Goth Ghani Dandi 0.30 0.30 - 72 Muhammad Shah Goth Ghani Dandi 0.44 0.44 - 73 Madni Shah Goth Ghani Dandi 0.27 0.27 - 74 Sadeq Ahmad Goth Ghani Dandi 0.58 0.58 - 75 Ahmad Shah Goth Ghani Dandi 1.81 1.81 - 76 Jam Shaid Khan Goth Ghani Dandi 0.37 0.37 - 77 Arbab Chachar Goth Ghani Dandi 0.61 0.61 - 78 Sanwal Mai De Goth Dandi 0.58 0.58 -
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 45 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Crops affected by the Construction of 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
Name of Parent Crops/ Orchards (Hectares)
Total No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Area Cotton Rice
79 Ghulam Hussain Mai De Goth Dandi 1.78 - 1.78 80 Ghulam Mustafa Mai De Goth Dandi 1.28 - 1.28 81 Mehmood Mai De Goth Dandi 1.18 - 1.18 82 Allah Dita Mai De Goth Dandi 1.91 - 1.91 83 Jamshaid Khan Mai De Goth Dandi 0.59 - 0.59 84 Riaz Patwari Mai De Goth Dandi 0.50 - 0.50 85 Muhammad Sumar Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 0.20 - 0.20 86 Sulaman Shah Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 2.20 - 2.20 87 Bashir Ahmad Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 0.55 - 0.55 88 Jam Haji Wilyat Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 0.58 - 0.58 89 Jam shabir Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 1.04 - 1.04 90 Ch Tariq Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 0.55 - 0.55 91 Pir Bux Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 0.57 - 0.57 92 Gul Muhammad Arien Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 0.72 - 0.72 93 Ch Fazal Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 1.24 - 1.24 94 Jam Munir Ahmad Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 0.21 - 0.21
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 46 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Crops affected by the Construction of 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
Name of Parent Crops/ Orchards (Hectares)
Total No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Area Cotton Rice
95 M Abdullah Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 0.64 - 0.64 96 Haji Aslam Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 0.61 - 0.61 97 Jam Qadir Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 1.16 1.16 - 98 Wali Muhammad Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 0.63 0.63 - 99 Jam Khalid Goth Makorar Kot Sabzal 0.56 0.56 - Sub-Total (a): District Ghotki: 109.82 80.91 28.91 Percentage 100.00 73.68 26.32 District Rahimyar Khan 100 Shah Muhammad Walana Walana 0.26 0.26 - 101 Mitho Mochi Walana Walana 0.22 0.22 - 102 Abdul Hameed Walana Walana 0.15 0.15 - 103 Ghulam Muhammad Walana Walana 0.38 0.38 - 104 Nazir Ahmad Walana Walana 0.22 - 0.22 105 Khushi Muhammad Walana Walana 1.12 - 1.12 106 Khan Muhammad Walana Walana 0.10 - 0.10 107 Wahid Bux Walana Walana 0.41 - 0.41
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 47 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Crops affected by the Construction of 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
Name of Parent Crops/ Orchards (Hectares)
Total No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Area Cotton Rice
108 Gul Jahan Walana Walana 0.15 - 0.15 109 Imam Bux Walana Walana 0.22 - 0.22 110 Nasir Ahmad Walana Walana 0.40 - 0.40 111 Ghulam Nabi Walana Walana 0.16 - 0.16 112 Habib Ullah Walana Walana 0.28 - 0.28 113 Shamas Walana Walana Walana 0.14 - 0.14 114 Allah Waraia Walana Walana 0.11 0.11 - 115 Dilbar Shah Walana Walana 0.52 0.52 - 116 Jam Shabru Walana Walana 0.09 0.09 - 117 Jam Nawaz Walana Walana 0.52 0.52 - 118 Allah Rakha Walana Walana 0.49 0.49 - 119 Hazor Bux Walana Walana 0.13 0.13 - 120 M Inyat Walana Walana 0.59 0.59 - 121 Jam Dilawar Walana Walana 0.49 0.49 - 122 Peer BuxJam Nazir Walana Walana 0.19 0.19 - 123 Muhammad Nawaz Walana Walana 0.64 0.64 -
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 48 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Crops affected by the Construction of 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
Name of Parent Crops/ Orchards (Hectares)
Total No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Area Cotton Rice
124 Faqir Bux Arien Walana Walana 0.56 0.56 - 125 Jam Sona Basti Allah Bux Bamba Shaheed 0.14 0.14 - 126 Attah Muhammad Basti Allah Bux Bamba Shaheed 0.59 0.59 - 127 Raees Allah Bux Basti Allah Bux Bamba Shaheed 1.87 1.87 - 128 Ch Rizwan Basti Allah Bux Bamba Shaheed 0.16 0.16 - 129 Ch Sheraz Arien Basti Allah Bux Bamba Shaheed 0.14 0.14 - 130 Muhammad Rafique Kata Basti Allah Bux Bamba Shaheed 0.41 0.41 - 131 Ch Javaid Basti Ch Javaid Bamba Shaheed 0.49 0.49 - 132 Nadeem Jat Basti Ch Javaid Bamba Shaheed 0.12 0.12 - 133 Ch Muhammad Sarwar Basti Ch Javaid Bamba Shaheed 0.56 0.56 - 134 Munir Ahmad Chak 28 Ahmad Pur 1.13 1.13 - 135 Akhtar Hayat Chak 28 Ahmad Pur 1.51 - 1.51 136 Muhammad Shabeer Chak 28 Ahmad Pur 0.61 - 0.61 137 Yaseen Joia Chak 28 Ahmad Pur 0.68 - 0.68 138 Fazal Kamboh Chak 28 Ahmad Pur 0.56 - 0.56 139 Haji Jahar Arien Basti Jahar Ahmad Pur 0.40 - 0.40
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 49 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Crops affected by the Construction of 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
Name of Parent Crops/ Orchards (Hectares)
Total No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Area Cotton Rice
140 Mian Aslam Shaikh Basti JAHar Ahmad Pur 0.14 - 0.14 141 Khadim Hussain Basti Hazoor Bux Ahmad Pur 0.38 - 0.38 142 Malik Langar Basti Hazoor Bux Ahmad Pur 1.84 - 1.84 143 Imam Bux Basti Hazoor Bux Ahmad Pur 2.54 - 2.54 144 Ch Abdul Khaliq Basti Hazoor Bux Ahmad Pur 0.19 - 0.19 145 Ch Abdul Hameed Basti Hazoor Bux Ahmad Pur 1.21 - 1.21 146 Ch Qazi ZAHar Basti Hazoor Bux Ahmad Pur 0.31 - 0.31 147 Ch Fazal Ahmad Basti Hazoor Bux Ahmad Pur 0.26 - 0.26 148 Jind Wada Basti Jind Wada Ahmad Pur 2.50 2.50 - 149 Manzoor Ahmad Basti Jind Wada Ahmad Pur 1.12 1.12 - 150 Ali Shair Basti Jind Wada Ahmad Pur 0.70 0.70 - 151 Ahmad Bux Basti Jind Wada Ahmad Pur 1.99 1.99 - 152 Muhammad Akram Basti Jind Wada Ahmad Pur 0.58 0.58 - 153 Muhammad Dhaia Basti Jind Wada Ahmad Pur 1.05 1.05 - 154 Javaid Iqbal Chak 27 Chak 27 0.65 0.65 - 155 Ismat Ullah Chak 27 Chak 27 1.27 1.27 -
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 50 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Crops affected by the Construction of 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
Name of Parent Crops/ Orchards (Hectares)
Total No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Area Cotton Rice
156 Muhammad Parvaiz Chak 27 Chak 27 0.65 0.65 - 157 Muhammad Shahid Chak 27 Chak 27 0.29 0.29 - 158 Liaqat Ali Chak 27 Chak 27 1.22 1.22 - 159 Bashir Ahmad Chak 27 Chak 27 0.59 0.59 - 160 Muhammad Khan Chak 27 Chak 27 1.31 1.31 - 161 Ch Azam Chak 27 Chak 27 1.81 1.81 - 162 Muhammad Murtaza Chak 27 Chak 27 1.34 1.34 - 163 Adil Shahzad Chak 27 Chak 27 0.68 0.68 - 164 Shah Jahan Chak 27 Chak 27 0.64 0.64 - 165 Sadeeq Chachar Chak 27 Chak 27 0.22 0.22 - 166 Shakho Chachar Chak 27 Chak 27 0.52 0.52 - 167 Muhammad Sumar Chachar Chak 27 Chak 27 0.54 0.54 - 168 Imam Bux Chak 27 Chak 27 0.10 0.10 - 169 Alqaim Chachar Chak 27 Chak 27 0.06 0.06 - 170 Nazo Malik Chak 27 Chak 27 0.07 0.07 - 171 Allah Dita Chak 27 Chak 27 0.14 0.14 -
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 51 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Crops affected by the Construction of 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
Name of Parent Crops/ Orchards (Hectares)
Total No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Area Cotton Rice
172 Ghulam Muhammad Chak 27 Chak 27 0.49 0.49 - 173 Muhammad Aslam Chak 9 NP Sadiq Abad 0.49 0.49 - 174 Sharif Chachar Chak 9 NP Sadiq Abad 1.81 1.81 - 175 Muhammad Shabir Chak 9 NP Sadiq Abad 1.06 1.06 - 176 Allah Dita Chak 9 NP Sadiq Abad 0.23 0.23 - 177 Muhammad Sarfraz Chak 9 NP Sadiq Abad 0.65 0.65 - 178 Attah Muhammad Chak 9 NP Sadiq Abad 0.53 0.53 - 179 Haq Nawaz Chak 9 NP Sadiq Abad 1.29 1.29 - 180 Abdul Rahman Chak 9 NP Sadiq Abad 1.07 1.07 - Sub-Total (b): District Shikarpur 52.44 38.61 13.83 Percentage 100.00 73.63 26.37 SUM TOTAL (a+b): 162.26 119.52 42.74
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 52 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
A: District Ghotki :
1 - - - - - 0 2 2 - 1 - - 3 3 - - - - - 0 4 - - - - - 0 5 - - - - - 0 6 - - - - - 0 7 - - - - - 0 8 - - - - - 0 9 - - - - - 0 10 - - 1 - - 1 11 - - - - - 0 12 - - 2 - - 2 13 - - 1 1 - 2
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 53 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
14 - - - 1 - 1 15 - - - - - 0 16 - - - - - 0 17 - - - - - 0 18 - - - - - 0 19 - - - - - 0 20 - - - - - 0 21 - - - - - 0 22 1 - - - - 1 23 - - - - - 0 24 - - - - - 0 25 - - 1 - 1 2 26 - - - 2 - 2 27 - - - - 2 2 28 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 54 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
29 - - - - - 0 30 - - - - - 0 31 - - - - - 0 32 - - - - - 0 33 - - - - - 0 34 - - - - - 0 35 - - - - - 0 36 - - - - - 0 37 - - - - - 0 38 - - - - - 0 39 - - - - - 0 40 - - - - - 0 41 1 - - - - 1 42 - - - - - 0 43 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 55 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
44 - - - - - 0 45 - - - - - 0 46 - - - - - 0 47 - - - - - 0 48 - - - - - 0 49 - - - - - 0 50 - - 2 - - 2 51 - - - - - 0 52 - - - - - 0 53 - - - - - 0 54 - - 1 - - 1 55 - - - - - 0 56 - - - - - 0 57 - - - - - 0 58 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 56 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
59 - - - - - 0 60 - - - - - 0 61 - - - - - 0 62 - - - - - 0 63 - - - - - 0 64 - - - - - 0 65 - - - - - 0 66 - - - - - 0 67 - - 2 - - 2 68 - - - - - 0 69 - - - - - 0 70 - - - - - 0 71 - - - - - 0 72 - - 2 - - 2 73 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 57 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
74 - - - - 6 6 75 - - 2 - 2 4 76 - - - - - 0 77 1 - - 2 - 3 78 - - - - - 0 79 - - - - - 0 80 - - - - - 0 81 - - - - - 0 82 - - - - - 0 83 - - - - - 0 84 - - - - - 0 85 - - - - - 0 86 - - - - - 0 87 - - - - - 0 88 - - - 2 - 2
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 58 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
89 - - 2 - - 2 90 - - 2 - - 2 91 - - - - - 0 92 - - - - - 0 93 - - - - - 0 94 - - - - 2 2 95 - - - - - 0 96 - - - - - 0 97 - - - - - 0 98 - - - - - 0 99 - - 1 4 - 5 100 - - - - - 0 101 - - - - - 0 102 - - - - - 0 103 - - 2 - - 2
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 59 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
104 - - - - - 0 105 - - - - - 0 106 - - - - - 0 107 - - - - - 0 108 - - - - - 0 109 - - - - - 0 110 - - - - - 0 111 - - - - - 0 112 - - - - - 0 113 - - - - - 0 114 - - - - - 0 115 - - - - - 0 116 - - - - - 0 117 - - - - - 0 118 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 60 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
119 - - - - - 0 120 - - - - - 0 121 - - - - - 0 122 - - - - - 0 123 - - - - - 0 124 - - - - - 0 125 - - - - - 0 126 - - - - - 0 127 - - - - - 0 128 - - - - - 0 129 - - - - - 0 130 - - - - - 0 131 - - - - - 0 132 - - - - - 0 133 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 61 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
134 - - 2 - - 2 135 - - - - - 0 136 - - - - - 0 137 - - - - - 0 138 - - - - - 0 139 - - - - - 0 140 - - - - - 0 141 - - - - - 0 142 - - - - - 0 143 - - - - - 0 144 - - - - - 0 145 - - - - - 0 146 - - - - - 0 147 - - - - - 0 148 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 62 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
149 - - - - - 0 150 - - - - - 0 151 - - - - - 0 152 - - - - - 0 153 - - - - - 0 154 1 - - - - 1 155 - - - - - 0 156 - - - - - 0 157 - - - - - 0 158 - - - - - 0 159 - - 1 - - 1 160 - - - - - 0 161 - - - 2 - 2 162 - - - - - 0 163 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 63 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
164 - - - - - 0 165 - - - 1 - 1 166 - - - - - 0 167 - - - - - 0 168 - - - - - 0 169 - - - - - 0 170 - - - - - 0 171 - - - - - 0 172 - - - - - 0 173 - - - - - 0 174 - - - - - 0 175 - - - - - 0 176 - - - - - 0 177 - - - - - 0 178 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 64 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
179 - - - - - 0 180 - - - - - 0 181 - - - - - 0 182 - - - - - 0 183 - - 2 - 1 3 184 - - - - - 0 185 - - - - - 0 186 - - - - - 0 187 - - - - - 0 188 - - - - - 0 189 - - - - - 0 190 - - - - - 0 191 - - - - - 0 192 - - - - - 0 193 - - 2 - 2 4
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 65 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
194 - - - - - 0 195 - 8 - - - 8 196 - - 2 - - 2 197 - - - - - 0 198 - - - - - 0 199 - - - - - 0 200 - - 0 - - 0 201 - - - - - 0 202 - - - - - 0 203 - - - - - 0 204 - - - - - 0 205 - - - - - 0 206 - - - - - 0 207 - - - - - 0 208 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 66 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
209 - - - - - 0 210 - - - - - 0 Sub-Total (a) 6 8 31 15 16 76 Percentage (%): 8 11 41 20 21 100 B. District Rahimyar Khan:
211 - - - - - 0
212 - - - - - 0
213 - - - - - 0
214 1 - - - - 1
215 - - - - - 0
216 - - - - - 0
217 - - - - - 0
218 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 67 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
219 - - - - - 0
220 - - 3 - - 3
221 - - - - - 0
222 - - - - - 0
223 - - - - - 0
224 - - - - - 0
225 - - - - - 0
226 - - - - - 0
227 - - - - - 0
228 - - - - - 0
229 - - - - - 0
230 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 68 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
231 - - - - - 0
232 - - - - - 0
233 - - - - - 0
234 1 - 2 - 3 6
235 - 4 - - - 4
236 - - - - - 0
237 - - - - - 0
238 - - - - - 0
239 - - - - - 0
240 - - - - - 0
241 1 - - - - 1
242 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 69 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
243 - - - - - 0
244 - - - - - 0
245 - - - - - 0
246 - - - - - 0
247 - - - - - 0
248 - - - - - 0
249 - - - - - 0
250 - - - - - 0
251 - - - - - 0
252 - - - - - 0
253 - - - - - 0
254 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 70 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
255 - - - - - 0
256 - - - - - 0
257 - - 2 - - 2
258 - - - - - 0
259 - - - - - 0
260 - - - - - 0
261 - - - - - 0
262 - - - - - 0
263 - - - - - 0
264 - - 1 - - 1
265 - - 1 1 - 2
266 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 71 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
267 - - - - - 0
268 - - - - - 0
269 - - - - - 0
270 - - - - - 0
271 - - - - - 0
272 - - - - - 0
273 - - - - - 0
274 - - - - - 0
275 - - - - - 0
276 - - - - - 0
277 - - - - - 0
278 1 - - - - 1
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 72 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
279 - - - - - 0
280 - - - - - 0
281 - - - - - 0
282 - - - - - 0
283 - - 1 - - 1
284 - - - - - 0
285 - - - - - 0
286 - - - - - 0
287 - - - - - 0
288 - - - - - 0
289 - - - - - 0
290 - - - - - 0
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 73 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Type and Number of affected Trees by132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Right of Way)
Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees*
(From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Kikar Others Total No.
291 - - - - - 0
292 - - - - - 0
293 - - - - - 0
294 - - - - - 0
295 - - - - - 0
296 - - - - - 0
297 - - - - - 0
Sub-Total (b): 4 4 10 1 3 22
Percentage (%): 18 18 45 5 14 100
TOTAL (a+b): 10 12 41 16 19 98
Percentage 10 12 42 1619 100
* Botanical Names: Shisham = Sisso; Sirin = Albizia Lebbek; Kikar = Acacia Nicolta; Toot = Mulberry.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 74 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Sector-Wise Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject affected Person (AH) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AH Employment Small Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000")
No. Name of Household Head Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Overall
( A) District Ghotki:
1 Abdul Razaq - - - - 405.3 - 405.3 - 405.3 2 Jam Mashook 22.0 35.0 32.0 - 252.2 - 306.2 35.0 341.2 3 Ghulam Muhammad - - - - 496.8 - 496.8 - 496.8 4 Ghulam Haider - - - - 561.4 - 561.4 - 561.4 5 Ali Shair - - 45.0 - 82.1 - 127.1 - 127.1 6 Falak Shair - - - - 103.2 34.0 103.2 34.0 137.2 7 Qazi Laghari - - - - 132.0 - 132.0 - 132.0 8 Abdul Hameed - - - - 336.0 - 336.0 - 336.0 9 Abdul Rasheed - 35.0 - - 145.0 - 145.0 35.0 180.0 10 Ghulam Farid - - - - 112.9 - 112.9 - 112.9 11 Sikander Ali - - - - 135.6 - 135.6 - 135.6 12 Abdul Aziz - - - - 298.0 - 298.0 - 298.0 13 Faiz Muhammad 48.0 - - - 55.4 - 103.4 - 103.4 14 Allah Dita - - - - 198.4 - 198.4 - 198.4
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 75 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Sector-Wise Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject affected Person (AH) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AH Employment Small Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000")
No. Name of Household Head Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Overall
15 Khan Muhammad - - - - 113.4 - 113.4 - 113.4 16 Muhammad Afzal - - 68.0 - 491.0 - 559.0 - 559.0 17 Abdul Rahman 68.0 - - - 378.0 - 446.0 - 446.0 18 Shah Nawaz - - - - 87.3 - 87.3 - 87.3 19 Muhammad Arshad - - - - 148.7 - 148.7 - 148.7 20 Sahibzada - - - - 554.0 - 554.0 - 554.0 21 Sahib Dino - - - 56.0 62.4 - 62.4 56.0 118.4 22 Halay Khan Shar - - - - 75.1 - 75.1 - 75.1 23 Dadan Khan Shar - - 32.0 - 28.7 - 60.7 - 60.7 24 Milhan Shar - - 75.8 - 23.2 - 99.0 - 99.0 25 Warsaway Shar 45.0 - - - 362.0 - 407.0 - 407.0 26 Hatan Shar - - - - 109.0 24.0 109.0 24.0 133.0 27 Haji Shah Shar - - - - 335.4 - 335.4 - 335.4 28 Ahmad Yar - - - - 98.4 - 98.4 - 98.4 29 Milham Shar - - - - 802.4 - 802.4 - 802.4 30 Sozal Chachar - - - - 503.2 - 503.2 - 503.2
31 Muhammad Nawz Kosh - - - - 97.4 - 97.4 - 97.4 LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 76 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Sector-Wise Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject affected Person (AH) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AH Employment Small Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000")
No. Name of Household Head Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Overall
32 Gh. Muhd Chachar - - 32.5 - 34.5 - 67.0 - 67.0 33 M. Nawaz Chachar 82.0 - 56.8 - 21.4 - 160.2 - 160.2 34 Eiso Chachar - - - - 85.4 - 85.4 - 85.4 35 Abdul Hamid Chachar - - - - 147.2 - 147.2 - 147.2 36 Muhammad Shaban - - - - 75.4 - 75.4 - 75.4 37 Elahi Bux Chachar - - - - 222.4 - 222.4 - 222.4 38 Allah Waraia Chachar - - - - 96.4 - 96.4 - 96.4 39 Murid Khan Chachar - - - - 258.0 - 258.0 - 258.0 40 Ali Nawaz - 34.0 - - 472.3 40.0 472.3 74.0 546.3 41 Dost Muhammad - - - - 412.3 - 412.3 - 412.3 42 Chota Gogan - - - - 504.3 - 504.3 - 504.3 43 Arbab Chachar - - 45.0 - 197.0 - 242.0 - 242.0 44 Noor Muhammad Kori - - - - 86.4 - 86.4 - 86.4 45 Allah Wadhaia 34.0 - - 62.0 775.4 - 809.4 62.0 871.4 46 Esan Gogan - - - - 367.4 - 367.4 - 367.4 47 Jam Muhammad Shabani - - - - 152.2 - 152.2 - 152.2
48 Shabir - - - - 168.0 - 168.0 - 168.0 LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 77 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Sector-Wise Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject affected Person (AH) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AH Employment Small Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000")
No. Name of Household Head Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Overall
49 Muhammad Nazir - - - - 94.0 - 94.0 - 94.0 50 Shair Khan - - - - 205.4 - 205.4 - 205.4 51 Sajid Khan - - - - 64.0 - 64.0 - 64.0 52 Shah Jahan Khan - - 56.0 - 92.0 - 148.0 - 148.0 53 Bhutar Slahudin Khan - - 28.0 - 38.0 - 66.0 - 66.0 54 Wariam Khan - - - - 104.2 - 104.2 - 104.2 55 Shahid Khan 38.0 - - - 82.1 - 120.1 - 120.1 56 Khalid Khan - - - - 91.0 - 91.0 - 91.0 57 Zaman Khan - - - - 224.5 20.0 224.5 20.0 244.5 58 Siraj Khan - - - - 312.7 - 312.7 - 312.7 59 Haji Gulbar - - - 18.0 74.3 - 74.3 18.0 92.3 60 Aslam Arien - 48.0 - - 312.2 - 312.2 48.0 360.2 61 Muhammad Ibrahim - - 56.0 - 87.0 - 143.0 - 143.0 62 Dur Muhammad 37.0 - - - 102.0 - 139.0 - 139.0 63 Khadim Hussain - - 34.8 - 24.0 - 58.8 - 58.8 64 Ghulam Yaseen Abid - - 28.0 - 248.0 - 276.0 - 276.0
65 Mian Abdul Raof Adoja 64.0 - 44.0 - 263.0 - 371.0 - 371.0 LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 78 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Sector-Wise Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject affected Person (AH) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AH Employment Small Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000")
No. Name of Household Head Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Overall
66 Aziz Ullah - - - - 252.4 - 252.4 - 252.4 67 Hashim - - 38.8 - 39.6 - 78.4 - 78.4 68 Maqsood 65.0 - - - 80.2 - 145.2 - 145.2 69 Akram - - 28.0 - 34.2 - 62.2 - 62.2 70 Muhammad Afzal - - 48.0 - 204.3 - 252.3 - 252.3 71 Bhoral Shah - - - - 53.4 26.0 53.4 26.0 79.4 72 Muhammad Shah - 42.0 - - 68.6 - 68.6 42.0 110.6 73 Madni Shah 32.0 - - - 48.7 - 80.7 - 80.7 74 Sadeq Ahmad - - 39.0 - 87.6 - 126.6 - 126.6 75 Ahmad Shah 34.0 - 65.0 48.0 220.4 - 319.4 48.0 367.4 76 Jam Shaid Khan - - - - 64.6 30.0 64.6 30.0 94.6 77 Arbab Chachar 38.0 - - - 90.5 28.0 128.5 28.0 156.5 78 Sanwal - - - - 94.0 - 94.0 - 94.0 79 Ghulam Hussain - - - - 262.0 - 262.0 - 262.0 80 Ghulam Mustafa - - - - 257.0 - 257.0 - 257.0 81 Mehmood - - - - 148.0 20.0 148.0 20.0 168.0
82 Allah Dita - - 76.0 - 258.0 - 334.0 - 334.0 LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 79 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Sector-Wise Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject affected Person (AH) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AH Employment Small Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000")
No. Name of Household Head Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Overall
83 Jamshaid Khan - 64.0 - - 94.0 - 94.0 64.0 158.0 84 Riaz Patwari - - - - 172.0 - 172.0 - 172.0 85 Muhammad Sumar - - - - 225.0 - 225.0 - 225.0 86 Sulaman Shah - - - 38.0 324.8 - 324.8 38.0 362.8 87 Bashir Ahmad 46.0 - 68.0 - 101.0 - 215.0 - 215.0 88 Jam Haji Wilyat - - 82.0 - 90.4 - 172.4 - 172.4 89 Jam shabir - - - - 130.0 18.0 130.0 18.0 148.0 90 Ch Tariq 76.0 - - - 131.0 - 207.0 - 207.0 91 Pir Bux - - - - 74.2 - 74.2 - 74.2 92 Gul Muhammad Arien - - - - 86.2 - 86.2 - 86.2 93 Ch Fazal - 42.0 - - 312.4 - 312.4 42.0 354.4 94 Jam Munir Ahmad 32.0 - - - 42.6 - 74.6 - 74.6 95 M Abdullah - - 98.0 - 109.4 - 207.4 - 207.4 96 Haji Aslam - - - - 88.0 - 88.0 - 88.0 97 Jam Qadir - - - - 142.0 - 142.0 - 142.0 98 Wali Muhammad 48.5 - - - 176.4 - 224.9 - 224.9
99 Jam Khalid - - 67.0 - 121.0 - 188.0 - 188.0 LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 80 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Sector-Wise Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject affected Person (AH) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AH Employment Small Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000")
No. Name of Household Head Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Overall
Sub-Total (a): District Ghotki: 809.5 300.0 1,243.7 222.0 18,762.2 240.0 20,815.4 762.0 21,577.4 Percentage 73.0 27.0 84.9 15.1 98.7 1.3 96.5 3.5 100.0 District Rahimyar Khan 100 Shah Muhammad - - 12.0 - 44.2 - 56.2 - 56.2 101 Mitho Mochi - - - - 38.4 20.0 38.4 20.0 58.4 102 Abdul Hameed - 34.0 38.0 - 23.0 - 61.0 34.0 95.0 103 Ghulam Muhammad 46.0 - - - 50.3 - 96.3 - 96.3 104 Nazir Ahmad - - 120.0 - 32.4 - 152.4 - 152.4 105 Khushi Muhammad - - - 38.0 172.4 - 172.4 38.0 210.4 106 Khan Muhammad - - 48.0 - 22.0 - 70.0 - 70.0 107 Wahid Bux - - - - 69.0 - 69.0 - 69.0 108 Gul Jahan - - 48.0 - 26.0 - 74.0 - 74.0 109 Imam Bux - - 29.0 - 37.0 - 66.0 - 66.0 110 Nasir Ahmad - - - - 70.0 - 70.0 - 70.0 111 Ghulam Nabi - - 65.0 - 85.0 - 150.0 - 150.0 112 Habib Ullah - - - - 54.0 - 54.0 - 54.0
113 Shamas Walana 45.8 - - - 23.0 - 68.8 - 68.8 LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 81 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Sector-Wise Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject affected Person (AH) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AH Employment Small Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000")
No. Name of Household Head Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Overall
114 Allah Waraia - - 24.0 - 34.9 - 58.9 - 58.9 115 Dilbar Shah - - - - 87.0 - 87.0 - 87.0 116 Jam Shabru - 54.0 - - 27.9 24.0 27.9 78.0 105.9 117 Jam Nawaz - - - 44.0 92.0 - 92.0 44.0 136.0 118 Allah Rakha - - - - 87.0 - 87.0 - 87.0 119 Hazor Bux - - 68.0 - 25.0 - 93.0 - 93.0 120 M Inyat 46.8 - - - 98.0 - 144.8 - 144.8 121 Jam Dilawar - - - - 74.0 - 74.0 - 74.0 122 Peer BuxJam Nazir 45.0 - - - 24.0 - 69.0 - 69.0 123 Muhammad Nawaz - - - - 98.0 - 98.0 - 98.0 124 Faqir Bux Arien - - - - 92.4 - 92.4 - 92.4 125 Jam Sona - 32.0 - - 24.0 - 24.0 32.0 56.0 126 Attah Muhammad - - - - 103.0 - 103.0 - 103.0 127 Raees Allah Bux - - - - 226.0 - 226.0 - 226.0 128 Ch Rizwan 58.0 - - - 27.0 - 85.0 - 85.0 129 Ch Sheraz Arien 47.5 - - - 24.0 - 71.5 - 71.5
130 M. RAHique Kata - - 34.0 - 70.0 - 104.0 - 104.0 LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 82 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Sector-Wise Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject affected Person (AH) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AH Employment Small Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000")
No. Name of Household Head Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Overall
131 Ch Javaid - - - - 76.6 - 76.6 - 76.6 132 Nadeem Jat - 34.0 74.0 - 19.5 18.0 93.5 52.0 145.5 133 Ch Muhammad Sarwar - - - - 87.6 - 87.6 - 87.6 134 Munir Ahmad - - - - 156.0 - 156.0 - 156.0 135 Akhtar Hayat - - - - 209.4 - 209.4 - 209.4 136 Muhammad Shabeer - - - - 157.0 - 157.0 - 157.0 137 Yaseen Joya - - 64.4 - 108.6 - 173.0 - 173.0 138 Fazal Kamboh - - - - 97.0 - 97.0 - 97.0 139 Haji Jahar Arien - - - 67.0 92.0 - 92.0 67.0 159.0 140 Mian Aslam Shaikh - 39.4 - - 24.5 - 24.5 39.4 63.9 141 Khadim Hussain - - - - 67.3 - 67.3 - 67.3 142 Malik Langar - - - - 211.8 - 211.8 - 211.8 143 Imam Bux 34.8 - 34.7 - 307.0 - 376.5 - 376.5 144 Ch Abdul Khaliq 52.0 - - - 38.0 - 90.0 - 90.0 145 Ch Abdul Hameed - - - - 152.0 - 152.0 - 152.0 146 Ch Qazi Zafar - - - - 69.7 - 69.7 - 69.7
147 Ch Fazal Ahmad - - - - 43.7 22.0 43.7 22.0 65.7 LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 83 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Sector-Wise Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject affected Person (AH) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AH Employment Small Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000")
No. Name of Household Head Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Overall
148 Jind Wada - - - - 397.0 - 397.0 - 397.0 149 Manzoor Ahmad - - - - 207.0 - 207.0 - 207.0 150 Ali Shair - - - - 124.6 - 124.6 - 124.6 151 Ahmad Bux - - - - 352.8 - 352.8 - 352.8 152 Muhammad Akram - 46.0 24.0 - 94.3 - 118.3 46.0 164.3 153 Muhammad Dhaia - - - - 140.0 - 140.0 - 140.0 154 javaid iqbal - - - - 98.3 - 98.3 - 98.3 155 Ismat Ullah - - - 45.0 182.0 - 182.0 45.0 227.0 156 Muhammad Parvaiz - - - - 104.0 - 104.0 - 104.0 157 Muhammad Shahid 23.8 - - - 53.7 - 77.5 - 77.5 158 Liaqat Ali - - 78.0 - 157.0 - 235.0 - 235.0 159 Bashir Ahmad 68.0 - - - 82.0 - 150.0 - 150.0 160 Muhammad Khan - - - - 209.0 - 209.0 - 209.0 161 Ch Azam - - - - 252.4 - 252.4 - 252.4 162 Muhammad Murtaza 87.0 - - - 154.4 32.0 241.4 32.0 273.4 163 Adil Shahzad 65.0 72.0 - - 90.4 - 155.4 72.0 227.4
164 Shah Jahan - - 42.0 - 103.4 - 145.4 - 145.4 LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 84 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Sector-Wise Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject affected Person (AH) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AH Employment Small Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000")
No. Name of Household Head Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Overall
165 Sadeeq Chachar - - 80.0 - 32.4 - 112.4 - 112.4 166 Shakho Chachar - - - - 94.5 - 94.5 - 94.5 167 M. Sumar Chachar - 38.0 - - 80.4 - 80.4 38.0 118.4 168 Imam Bux 23.4 - - - 22.4 18.5 45.8 18.5 64.3 169 Alqaim Chachar 38.0 - 34.0 - 18.7 - 90.7 - 90.7 170 Nazo Malik 42.8 - - 32.0 15.8 - 58.6 32.0 90.6 171 Allah Dita - - 48.0 - 26.7 - 74.7 - 74.7 172 Ghulam Muhammad - - 34.0 - 147.0 - 181.0 - 181.0 173 Muhammad Aslam 65.0 - - - 78.0 - 143.0 - 143.0 174 Sharif Chachar - 34.0 - - 225.6 - 225.6 34.0 259.6 175 Muhammad Shabir 52.0 - - - 14.7 22.0 66.7 22.0 88.7 176 Allah Dita - - 45.6 - 91.2 26.0 136.8 26.0 162.8 177 Muhammad Sarfraz - - - - 98.0 - 98.0 - 98.0 178 Attah Muhammad 42.6 - 29.0 - 94.6 - 166.2 - 166.2 179 Haq Nawaz 48.0 84.0 44.0 - 146.4 - 238.4 84.0 322.4 180 Abdul Rahman - - - - 151.5 - 151.5 - 151.5
Sub-Total (b): Rahimyar Khan 931.5 467.4 1,117.7 226.0 8,018.8 182.5 10,068.0 875.9 10,943.9 LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 85 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Sector-Wise Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject affected Person (AH) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AH Employment Small Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000")
No. Name of Household Head Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Overall
Sector-Wise Percentage 66.6 33.4 83.2 16.8 97.8 2.2 92.0 8.0 100.0 OVERALL TOTAL: 1,741.0 767.4 2,361.4 448.0 26,781.0 422.5 30,883.4 1,637.9 32,521.3 Sector-Wise Percentage 69.4 30.6 84.1 15.9 98.4 1.6 95.0 5.0 100.0 Sector Totals / Averages: 2,508.4 39.19 2,809.4 43.90 27,203.5 425.1 32,521.3 508.1 Sector Percentages: 7.71 8.64 83.65 100.00
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 86 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-7: Per Capita Income of affected Farmers by 132kV transmission line Jarwar - Sadiqabad Subproject
HH Size Total Income Per Capita Income (Rs./Person)
No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) (Persons) (Rs./Year) Annual Monthly Daily
(A ) District Ghotki:
1 Abdul Razaq 21 405,300.0 19,300 1,608 52.88 2 Jam Mashook 18 341,200.0 18,956 1,580 51.93 3 Ghulam Muhammad 24 496,800.0 20,700 1,725 56.71 4 Ghulam Haider 18 561,400.0 31,189 2,599 85.45 5 Ali Shair 9 127,100.0 14,122 1,177 38.69 6 Falak Shair 11 137,200.0 12,473 1,039 34.17 7 Qazi Laghari 10 132,000.0 13,200 1,100 36.16 8 Abdul Hameed 18 336,000.0 18,667 1,556 51.14 9 Abdul Rasheed 11 180,000.0 16,364 1,364 44.83 10 Ghulam Farid 9 112,900.0 12,544 1,045 34.37 11 Sikander Ali 13 135,600.0 10,431 869 28.58 12 Abdul Aziz 7 298,000.0 42,571 3,548 116.63 13 Faiz Muhammad 10 103,400.0 10,340 862 28.33 14 Allah Dita 15 198,400.0 13,227 1,102 36.24 15 Khan Muhammad 8 113,400.0 14,175 1,181 38.84 16 Muhammad Afzal 19 559,000.0 29,421 2,452 80.61 17 Abdul Rahman 22 446,000.0 20,273 1,689 55.54 18 Shah Nawaz 7 87,300.0 12,471 1,039 34.17
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 87 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
HH Size Total Income Per Capita Income (Rs./Person)
No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) (Persons) (Rs./Year) Annual Monthly Daily
19 Muhammad Arshad 8 148,700.0 18,588 1,549 50.92 20 Sahibzada 28 554,000.0 19,786 1,649 54.21 21 Sahib Dino 11 118,400.0 10,764 897 29.49 22 Halay Khan Shar 7 75,100.0 10,729 894 29.39 23 Dadan Khan Shar 5 60,700.0 12,140 1,012 33.26 24 Milhan Shar 7 99,000.0 14,143 1,179 38.75 25 Warsaway Shar 15 407,000.0 27,133 2,261 74.34 26 Hatan Shar 13 133,000.0 10,231 853 28.03 27 Haji Shah Shar 14 335,400.0 23,957 1,996 65.64 28 Ahmad Yar 8 98,400.0 12,300 1,025 33.70 29 Milham Shar 31 802,400.0 25,884 2,157 70.91 30 Sozal Chachar 19 503,200.0 26,484 2,207 72.56 31 Muhammad Nawz Kosh 9 97,400.0 10,822 902 29.65 32 Ghulam Muhammad Chachar 6 67,000.0 11,167 931 30.59 33 Muhammad Nawaz Chachar 13 160,200.0 12,323 1,027 33.76 34 Eiso Chachar 7 85,400.0 12,200 1,017 33.42 35 Abdul Hamid Chachar 14 147,200.0 10,514 876 28.81 36 Muhammad Shaban 7 75,400.0 10,771 898 29.51 37 Elahi Bux Chachar 15 222,400.0 14,827 1,236 40.62 38 Allah Waraia Chachar 9 96,400.0 10,711 893 29.35
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 88 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
HH Size Total Income Per Capita Income (Rs./Person)
No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) (Persons) (Rs./Year) Annual Monthly Daily
39 Murid Khan Chachar 12 258,000.0 21,500 1,792 58.90 40 Ali Nawaz 22 546,300.0 24,832 2,069 68.03 41 Dost Muhammad 19 412,300.0 21,700 1,808 59.45 42 Chota Gogan 20 504,300.0 25,215 2,101 69.08 43 Arbab Chachar 11 242,000.0 22,000 1,833 60.27 44 Noor Muhammad Kori 8 86,400.0 10,800 900 29.59 45 Allah Wadhaia 19 871,400.0 45,863 3,822 125.65 46 Esan Gogan 16 367,400.0 22,963 1,914 62.91 47 Jam Muhammad Shabani 7 152,200.0 21,743 1,812 59.57 48 Shabir 14 168,000.0 12,000 1,000 32.88 49 Muhammad Nazir 8 94,000.0 11,750 979 32.19 50 Shair Khan 17 205,400.0 12,082 1,007 33.10 51 Sajid Khan 5 64,000.0 12,800 1,067 35.07 52 Shah Jahan Khan 13 148,000.0 11,385 949 31.19 53 Bhutar Slahudin Khan 6 66,000.0 11,000 917 30.14 54 Wariam Khan 10 104,200.0 10,420 868 28.55 55 Shahid Khan 11 120,100.0 10,918 910 29.91 56 Khalid Khan 7 91,000.0 13,000 1,083 35.62 57 Zaman Khan 17 244,500.0 14,382 1,199 39.40 58 Siraj Khan 14 312,700.0 22,336 1,861 61.19
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 89 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
HH Size Total Income Per Capita Income (Rs./Person)
No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) (Persons) (Rs./Year) Annual Monthly Daily
59 Haji Gulbar 8 92,300.0 11,538 961 31.61 60 Aslam Arien 13 360,200.0 27,708 2,309 75.91 61 Muhammad Ibrahim 11 143,000.0 13,000 1,083 35.62 62 Dur Muhammad 13 139,000.0 10,692 891 29.29 63 Khadim Hussain 5 58,800.0 11,760 980 32.22 64 Ghulam Yaseen Abid 15 276,000.0 18,400 1,533 50.41 65 Mian Abdul Raof Adoja 23 371,000.0 16,130 1,344 44.19 66 Aziz Ullah 11 252,400.0 22,945 1,912 62.86 67 Hashim 5 78,400.0 15,680 1,307 42.96 68 Maqsood 8 145,200.0 18,150 1,513 49.73 69 Akram 6 62,200.0 10,367 864 28.40 70 Muhammad Afzal 17 252,300.0 14,841 1,237 40.66 71 Bhoral Shah 6 79,400.0 13,233 1,103 36.26 72 Muhammad Shah 7 110,600.0 15,800 1,317 43.29 73 Madni Shah 6 80,700.0 13,450 1,121 36.85 74 Sadeq Ahmad 11 126,600.0 11,509 959 31.53 75 Ahmad Shah 15 367,400.0 24,493 2,041 67.11 76 Jam Shaid Khan 6 94,600.0 15,767 1,314 43.20 77 Arbab Chachar 14 156,500.0 11,179 932 30.63 78 Sanwal 8 94,000.0 11,750 979 32.19
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 90 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
HH Size Total Income Per Capita Income (Rs./Person)
No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) (Persons) (Rs./Year) Annual Monthly Daily
79 Ghulam Hussain 12 262,000.0 21,833 1,819 59.82 80 Ghulam Mustafa 16 257,000.0 16,063 1,339 44.01 81 Mehmood 11 168,000.0 15,273 1,273 41.84 82 Allah Dita 16 334,000.0 20,875 1,740 57.19 83 Jamshaid Khan 11 158,000.0 14,364 1,197 39.35 84 Riaz Patwari 12 172,000.0 14,333 1,194 39.27 85 Muhammad Sumar 15 225,000.0 15,000 1,250 41.10 86 Sulaman Shah 19 362,800.0 19,095 1,591 52.31 87 Bashir Ahmad 10 215,000.0 21,500 1,792 58.90 88 Jam Haji Wilyat 16 172,400.0 10,775 898 29.52 89 Jam shabir 13 148,000.0 11,385 949 31.19 90 Ch Tariq 17 207,000.0 12,176 1,015 33.36 91 Pir Bux 6 74,200.0 12,367 1,031 33.88 92 Gul Muhammad Arien 7 86,200.0 12,314 1,026 33.74 93 Ch Fazal 15 354,400.0 23,627 1,969 64.73 94 Jam Munir Ahmad 7 74,600.0 10,657 888 29.20 95 M Abdullah 13 207,400.0 15,954 1,329 43.71 96 Haji Aslam 8 88,000.0 11,000 917 30.14 97 Jam Qadir 13 142,000.0 10,923 910 29.93 98 Wali Muhammad 12 224,900.0 18,742 1,562 51.35
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 91 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
HH Size Total Income Per Capita Income (Rs./Person)
No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) (Persons) (Rs./Year) Annual Monthly Daily
99 Jam Khalid 13 188,000.0 14,462 1,205 39.62 Sub-Total (a): Ghotki: 1222 8548000 724549.3358 60379.11132 1985.066673 Average Household Size: 12.34 178,083.33 15,094.78 1,257.90 41.36 B. Rahimyar Khan 100 Shah Muhammad 5 56,200 11,240 937 30.79 101 Mitho Mochi 5 58,400 11,680 973 32.00 102 Abdul Hameed 9 95,000 10,556 880 28.92 103 Ghulam Muhammad 6 96,300 16,050 1,338 43.97 104 Nazir Ahmad 13 152,400 11,723 977 32.12 105 Khushi Muhammad 18 210,400 11,689 974 32.02 106 Khan Muhammad 6 70,000 11,667 972 31.96 107 Wahid Bux 6 69,000 11,500 958 31.51 108 Gul Jahan 7 74,000 10,571 881 28.96 109 Imam Bux 6 66,000 11,000 917 30.14 110 Nasir Ahmad 6 70,000 11,667 972 31.96 111 Ghulam Nabi 12 150,000 12,500 1,042 34.25 112 Habib Ullah 5 54,000 10,800 900 29.59 113 Shamas Walana 7 68,800 9,829 819 26.93 114 Allah Waraia 5 58,900 11,780 982 32.27 115 Dilbar Shah 7 87,000 12,429 1,036 34.05
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 92 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
HH Size Total Income Per Capita Income (Rs./Person)
No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) (Persons) (Rs./Year) Annual Monthly Daily
116 Jam Shabru 8 105,900 13,238 1,103 36.27 117 Jam Nawaz 13 136,000 10,462 872 28.66 118 Allah Rakha 8 87,000 10,875 906 29.79 119 Hazor Bux 8 93,000 11,625 969 31.85 120 M Inayat 12 144,800 12,067 1,006 33.06 121 Jam Dilawar 7 74,000 10,571 881 28.96 122 Peer BuxJam Nazir 6 69,000 11,500 958 31.51 123 Muhammad Nawaz 9 98,000 10,889 907 29.83 124 Faqir Bux Arien 7 92,400 13,200 1,100 36.16 125 Jam Sona 5 56,000 11,200 933 30.68 126 Attah Muhammad 8 103,000 12,875 1,073 35.27 127 Raees Allah Bux 18 226,000 12,556 1,046 34.40 128 Ch Rizwan 7 85,000 12,143 1,012 33.27 129 Ch Sheraz Arien 6 71,500 11,917 993 32.65 130 Muhammad Rafique Kata 9 104,000 11,556 963 31.66 131 Ch Javaid 8 76,600 9,575 798 26.23 132 Nadeem Jat 9 145,500 16,167 1,347 44.29 133 Ch Muhammad Sarwar 8 87,600 10,950 913 30.00 134 Munir Ahmad 13 156,000 12,000 1,000 32.88 135 Akhtar Hayat 16 209,400 13,088 1,091 35.86
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 93 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
HH Size Total Income Per Capita Income (Rs./Person)
No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) (Persons) (Rs./Year) Annual Monthly Daily
136 Muhammad Shabeer 14 157,000 11,214 935 30.72 137 Yaseen Joia 16 173,000 10,813 901 29.62 138 Fazal Kamboh 9 97,000 10,778 898 29.53 139 Haji Johar Arien 14 159,000 11,357 946 31.12 140 Mian Aslam Shaikh 6 63,900 10,650 888 29.18 141 Khadim Hussain 6 67,300 11,217 935 30.73 142 Malik Langar 16 211,800 13,238 1,103 36.27 143 Imam Bux 28 376,500 13,446 1,121 36.84 144 Ch Abdul Khaliq 8 90,000 11,250 938 30.82 145 Ch Abdul Hameed 14 152,000 10,857 905 29.75 146 Ch Qazi Zafar 6 69,700 11,617 968 31.83 147 Ch Fazal Ahmad 6 65,700 10,950 913 30.00 148 Jind Wada 23 397,000 17,261 1,438 47.29 149 Manzoor Ahmad 11 207,000 18,818 1,568 51.56 150 Ali Shair 11 124,600 11,327 944 31.03 151 Ahmad Bux 21 352,800 16,800 1,400 46.03 152 Muhammad Akram 15 164,300 10,953 913 30.01 153 Muhammad Dhaia 13 140,000 10,769 897 29.50 154 Javaid iqbal 7 98,300 14,043 1,170 38.47 155 Ismat Ullah 16 227,000 14,188 1,182 38.87
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 94 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
HH Size Total Income Per Capita Income (Rs./Person)
No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) (Persons) (Rs./Year) Annual Monthly Daily
156 Muhammad Parvaiz 9 104,000 11,556 963 31.66 157 Muhammad Shahid 7 77,500 11,071 923 30.33 158 Liaqat Ali 16 235,000 14,688 1,224 40.24 159 Bashir Ahmad 9 150,000 16,667 1,389 45.66 160 Muhammad Khan 13 209,000 16,077 1,340 44.05 161 Ch Azam 19 252,400 13,284 1,107 36.40 162 Muhammad Murtaza 15 273,400 18,227 1,519 49.94 163 Adil Shahzad 18 227,400 12,633 1,053 34.61 164 Shah Jahan 12 145,400 12,117 1,010 33.20 165 Sadeeq Chachar 10 112,400 11,240 937 30.79 166 Shakho Chachar 8 94,500 11,813 984 32.36 167 Muhammad Sumar Chachar 9 118,400 13,156 1,096 36.04 168 Imam Bux 5 64,300 12,860 1,072 35.23 169 Alqaim Chachar 8 90,700 11,338 945 31.06 170 Nazo Malik 8 90,600 11,325 944 31.03 171 Allah Dita 7 74,700 10,671 889 29.24 172 Ghulam Muhammad 14 181,000 12,929 1,077 35.42 173 Muhammad Aslam 11 143,000 13,000 1,083 35.62 174 Sharif Chachar 16 259,600 16,225 1,352 44.45 175 Muhammad Shabir 8 88,700 11,088 924 30.38
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 95 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
HH Size Total Income Per Capita Income (Rs./Person)
No. Name of affected Farmer (HHH) (Persons) (Rs./Year) Annual Monthly Daily
176 Allah Dita 15 162,800 10,853 904 29.74 177 Muhammad Sarfraz 9 98,000 10,889 907 29.83 178 Attah Muhammad 14 166,200 11,871 989 32.52 179 Haq Nawaz 19 322,400 16,968 1,414 46.49 180 Abdul Rahman 14 151,500 10,821 902 29.65 Sub-Total (b): Rahimyar Khan 861 4358200 362365 30197.09125 993 Average Household Size: 10.63 145,273.33 12,078.84 1,006.57 33.09 Overall Total: 2083 12,906,200 1,086,914 90,576 2,978 Average Household Size: 11.57 165,464.10 13,934.80 1,161.23 38.18
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 96 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
APPENDIX 2: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS IN CONSULTATION SESSIONS
Men's Groups Women's Groups
No. Name Status AH No. Name Status AH
Group 1-M: Village 1: Goth Elahi Bux (Sindh) Group 1-W: Village 1: Goth Elahi Bux (Sind)
1 Abdul Hameed Landowner AH 1 Hajira Bibi Housewife AH
2 Abdul Rasheed Landowner AH 2 Mariam Housewife AH
3 Ghulam Farid Landowner AH 3 Hameeda Bibi Housewife AH
4 Abdul Aziz Landowner AH 4 Ghulam Ruquia Student -
5 Allah Ditta Landowner AH 5 Hajira Student -
6 Khalid Ahmad Govt. Servent - 6 Ayshia Bibi Teacher -
7 Faiz Muhammad Labour - 7 Farida Bibi Housewife -
8 Sikander Ali Shopkeeper - 8 Karima Mai Housewife -
- - - - 9 Ghulam Bibi Labour -
Group 2-M: Village 2: Chak 171 (Sindh) Village 2: Chak 171 (Sindh)
9 Lal Bux Teacher - No Women Group could be assembled
10 Riaz Pahlwan Teacher - - - - -
11 Ghulam Haider Landowner AH - - - -
12 Ameer Hamza Landowner AH - - - -
13 Wazir Ahmad Landowner AH - - - -
14 Muhammad Paro Tanent AH - - - -
15 Kutab Deen Tanent AH - - - -
16 Mehboob Ali Driver - - - - -
Group 3-M: Village 3: Shah Pur (Sindh) Group 2-W: Village 3: Shah Pur (Sindh)
17 Sultan Ali Landowner - 10 Mariam Bibi Housewife AH
18 Asghar Ali Landowner AH 11 Karima Bibi Housewife AH
19 Ghulam Haider Landowner AH 11 Maryam Bibi Housewife AH
20 Shabir Ahmad Landowner AH 12 Bhag Bhari Housewife -
21 Dost Ali Labour AH 13 Sadea Raheem Student -
22 Gul Muhammad Labour - 14 Kainat Bibi Labour AH
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Men's Groups Women's Groups
No. Name Status AH No. Name Status AH
23 Muhammad Musa Sharecropper - 15 Kubra Bibi Housewife -
24 Piara Sharecropper - 16 Asya Khatoon Labour -
25 Bashir Ali Teacher - - - - -
26 Imam Bux Student - Group 3-W: Village 4: Walana (Punjab)
Group 4-M; Village 4: Walana (Punjab) 17 Hajira Batool Housewife AH
27 Dilbar Landowner AH 18 Parween Khatoon Housewife AH
28 Jam Nawaz Landowner AH 19 Shamsa Batool Housewife AH
29 Allah Bux Landowner AH 20 Mania Bibi Teacher -
30 Muhammad Inyat Landowner AH 21 Amina Begum Teacher -
31 Faqir Bux Tanent AH 22 Shamim Khatoon Student -
32 Ch Sultan Tanent AH 23 Afzal Khatoon Student -
33 Ch Sheraz Shopkeeper AH - - - -
34 Fahim Ahmad Labour - Group 4-W: Village 5: Chak 9 NP (Punjab)
35 Fazal Karim Labour - 24 Almas Bibi Housewife AH
Group 5-M: Village 5: Chak 9 NP (Punjab) 25 Shakira Khatoon Housewife AH
36 Abdul Hameed Landowner - 26 Waheda Bibi Housewife AH
37 Muhammad Aslam Landowner AH 27 Aasma Khatoon Housewife AH
38 Muhammad Sharif Wagon Driver AH 28 Kainat Bibi Labour -
39 Shabir Hussain Landowner AH 29 Shakira Bibi Housewife -
40 Sarfraz Ahmad LO + Tanent AH 30 Naheda Nasreen Housewife -
41 Atta Muhammad Shopkeeper - 31 Malkani Bibi Student -
42 Haq Nawaz Service - 32 Mariam Khatoon Labour -
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
APPENDIX 3 – DRAFT PUBLIC INFORMATION BROCHURE
Power Transmission Enhancement Program New Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line
National Transmission and Dispatch Company Government of Pakistan
September 2007
Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts Compensation/Rehabilitation: Information Booklet
A General 1. The National Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC) is intending to take a loan from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to implement the Power Transmission Enhancement Program (PTEP) aiming at upgrading and extending the transmission network to expanding the capacity and coverage of the network. The project will be implemented over five to six years, and will include a number of tranches or groups of subprojects. 2. The first tranche included some 21 subprojects including three new grid stations, expansion of existing grid stations, and installation of associated transmission lines; 18 of the subprojects will not cause any resettlement impacts as they entail transformers being installed within an existing grid station site and no works beyond the existing grid station site boundaries. There are three subprojects (including this Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject) that required transmission lines and the installation of the towers for these will require land acquisition, and the stringing of their lines will mean that crops and trees will be damaged. 3. The Jarwar Power Plant will be constructed by the Star Power Company (SPC), an independent power producing (IPP) firm, near Dharaki, District Ghotki, Sindhj Province. The SPC has purchased the land and would soon start construction and installation works and plan to generate Electricity after two years. The New Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject will supply additional power from Jarwar Power Plant to the existing 220kV Grid Station at Sadiqabad, and enhance its capacity for the entire Rahimyar Khan District and other districts in the Southern Punjab region. 4. The subproject will be implemented in the area where you live starting later in 2007 and will affect crops and trees in your communities. To compensate and/or rehabilitate these losses the provisions of relevant Pakistan laws and of the ADB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement will be adopted. This has included the preparation of a Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework (LARF) setting out the basic compensation/rehabilitation provisions for the PTEP and a Land
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) providing data on impacts and affected households and indicating in detail how the impacts will be compensated or rehabilitated has been prepared for each subproject that requires temporary disturbance to land and subsequent compensation for crops and trees. 5. Both the LARF and the LARP in Urdu language will be available for perusal to anyone interested at the Project Implementation Unit in Rahimyar Khan district. This booklet summarizing the provisions of the LARF and the LARP for the New Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject is given to all the families whose land, trees and crops and incomes are affected by this subproject. The objective of this booklet is to inform them of the essential compensation and rehabilitation policy for the New Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132kV Transmission Line Subproject and of a number of basic issues relative to the implementation of the compensation and rehabilitation program. B. Principles for Compensation and/or Rehabilitation Of affected Families Principles for the compensation/rehabilitation of affected people (AHs) by the New Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject are: 1. Land acquisition will be avoided and acquisition will only occur where access to, or use of, an AH’s land is affected; 2. Compensation will guarantee the maintenance of the AHs pre-project living standards; 3. AHs will be fully informed/consulted on compensation options; 4. AHs’ socio-cultural institutions will be supported and used; 5. Land acquisition provisions will equally apply to women and men; 6. Lack of formal title will not impede rehabilitation of families losing land; 7. Particular attention will be paid to women-headed households and vulnerable groups; 8. Land acquisition budgets will be included in project costs; and 9. Compensation will be fully provided prior to ground leveling and demolition.
C. Compensation and Rehabilitation Eligibility and Entitlements All families residing in affected areas and holding affected assets or incomes before the eligibility cut-off date for the project 18th August 2007 (the date of the end of the impact survey) will be entitled to compensation and/or rehabilitation for their losses. This provision includes legal owners, sharecroppers and leaseholders and squatters as detailed in table 1 below.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 1 - Eligibility and Entitlements Matrix
Affected Asset Specification Compensation Entitlements People Arable Land Access is not Farmer/Titleholder No Land compensation provided that land is rehabilitated/restored to restricted and former quality following completion of works. Compensation, in cash, for existing or current all damaged crops and trees as per item below land use will Leaseholder No Land compensation provided that the land is rehabilitated/restored to remain (registered or not) former quality following completion of works. Compensation, in cash, for unchanged all damaged crops and trees as per item below Sharecroppers Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees as per item (registered or not) below Agricultural Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees as per item workers below Squatters Compensation, in cash, for all damaged crops/trees as per item below Land for land compensation with plots of equal value and productivity to the plots lost; or cash for affected land at replacement cost based on Farmer/Titleholder market value plus 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge and free of taxes, registration, and transfer costs
Renewal of lease in plots of equal value/productivity of plots lost, or Cash Leaseholder All adverse effects equivalent to market value of gross yield of affected land for the remaining (registered or not) on land use lease years (up to a maximum of 3 years). independent of Sharecroppers Cash compensation equal to market value of lost harvest share once severity of impact (registered or not) (temporary impact) or twice (permanent impact) Arable Land where Agricultural Cash indemnity equal to salary (including portions in kind) for remaining access is workers part of agricultural year. restricted 1 rehabilitation allowance equal to market value of 1 gross harvest Squatters and/or land (additional to crop compensation) for land use loss. use will be 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross harvest of Farmer/Titleholder affected affected land for 1 year (inclusive of winter and summer crop and Additional for Leaseholder severe impacts additional to standard crop compensation) (>10% of land loss) Sharecroppers 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of harvest share (registered or not) (additional to standard crop compensation) 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross harvest of the Squatters affected land for 1 year (inclusive of winter and summer crop and additional to standard crop compensation) Land x land through provision of plots comparable in value/location to plot Titleholder lost; or cash for affected land at full replacement cost free of taxes, Residential/ registration, transfer costs plus 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge. Commercial Renter/Leasehold 1-3 months allowance Land er Accommodation in a government resettlement area or a self-relocation Squatters allowance All relevant AHs Cash compensation at replacement rate for affected structure/other fixed Houses and (including squatters) assets free of salvaged materials, depreciation or transaction costs. For Structures partial impacts full cash assistance to restore remaining structure. All AHs (also Crop compensation in cash at full market rate for one harvest (either squatters) winter or summer) by default for impacts caused by tower bases and Crops Crops affected perimeter, stringing and access. All other crop losses will be compensated at market rates based on actual losses. Trees Trees affected All AHs (squatters) Cash compensation shall reflect income replacement All AHs (including Business owner: (i) Cash compensation equal to 1 year income, if loss Business Loss of business squatters) permanent; (ii) cash compensation for the period of business interruption, Employment or employment if loss is temporary. Worker/employee: lost wages indemnity for the business interruption period up to a 3 months maximum. Transport, All AHs so Provision of sufficient allowance to cover transport expenses and Relocation transition costs affected livelihood expenses for one month. Rehabilitation/substitution of affected structures/utilities (i.e. mosques, Community roads, schools etc. Vulnerable AH below poverty Employment priority in project-related jobs. AH line
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
D. Compensation Assessment for Affected Crops and Trees The following four tables (Tables A-2 to A-5) provide the bases for assessment of compensations for the affected agricultural crops and fruit and wood trees.
Table A-2: Categorization and Income Replacement of Affected Fruit Trees (Jarwar) No. of Name of Categorization Fruit Potential for Fruiting Income Affected Maturity Age Harvests Period Annual Replacement Income No. Fruit Tree Level (Years) Year (Years) (Rs) Value (Rs.) 1 Date Immature up to 10 0 18 2,250 40,500 Palm Mature-1 10 - 22 1 12 2,025 24,300 Mature-2 above 22 1 6 1,350 8,100 2 Mango Immature up to 10 0 15 2,750 41,250 Mature-1 10 - 20 1 10 2,375 23,750 Mature-2 above 20 1 5 1,825 9,125
Table A-3: Number and Compensation of of Affected Fruit Trees Name of Affected Fruit Tree (No.) Compensation Total Price No. Fruit Tree Category Line A Line B Total Rate (Rs.) (Rs.)
1 Date Palm Immature 1 1 2 40,500 81,000
Mature-1 3 1 4 24,300 97,200
Mature-2 2 2 4 8,100 32,400
Sub-total (a): Date-Palm 6 4 10 - 210,600
2 Mango Immature 1 2 3 41,250 123,750
Mature-1 3 1 4 23,750 95,000
Mature-2 4 1 5 9,125 45,625
Sub-total (b): Mango 8 4 12 - 264,375
TOTAL: 14 8 22 - 474,975
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Relative Sizes of Affected Wood Trees by Height and Girth (Jarwar) Name of Small Medium Large Wood Height Girth Height Girth No. Tree (m) (m) (m) (m) Height (m) Girth (m) up to 0.5 - 7.7 & 1.0 & 1 Shisham up to 3.8 0.5 3.9 - 7.6 0.9 above above up to 0.4 - 9.1 & 0.5 & 2 Kikar up to 4.6 0.3 4.6 - 9.1 0.5 above above up to 0.5 - 6.1 & 1.0 & 3 Eucalyptus up to 3.0 0.5 3.1 - 6.1 0.9 above above up to 0.5 - 6.1 & 1.0 & 4 Mulberry up to 3.0 0.5 3.1 - 6.1 0.9 above above up to 0.5 - 7.7 & 1.0 & 5 Sirin/Saras up to 3.8 0.5 3.9 - 7.6 0.9 above above
Table A-5: Number and Compensation of Affected Wood Trees Affected Wood Tree Market Name of Relative (No.) Rate Total Price No. Wood Tree Size Line A Line B Total (Rs.) (Rs.) 1 Shisham Small 8 2 10 4,050 40,500 Medium 16 5 21 6,250 131,250 Large 7 3 10 8,500 85,000 Sub-total (a): Shisham 31 10 41 - 256,750 2 Kikar (Acasia) Small 1 0 1 3,400 3,400 Medium 3 0 3 4,850 14,550 Large 11 1 12 6,150 73,800 Sub-total (b): Kikar 15 1 16 - 91,750 3 Eucalyptus Small 2 0 2 2,450 4,900 Medium 1 0 1 4,200 4,200 Large 0 0 0 5,500 - Sub-total (c): Eucalyptus 3 0 3 - 9,100 4 Mulberry Small 1 1 2 2,250 4,500 Medium 2 0 2 4,500 9,000 Large 0 0 0 6,000 - Sub-total (d): Mulberry 3 1 4 - 13,500 5 Others Small 5 0 5 2,000 10,000 Medium 3 2 5 4,500 22,500 Large 2 0 2 6,200 12,400 Sub-total (e): Others 10 2 12 - 44,900 TOTAL: 52 12 76 - 416,000
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
E. Some basic QUESTIONS related to the impacts compensation AND rehabilitation program for the project Question 1 - Do we need to have a land title in order to be compensated or rehabilitated? Answer: No. Lack of formal legal rights (title) to land does not prevent AHs from receiving at least rehabilitation assistance. All AHs who were occupying or using the affected land at the time of the cut-off date (see above) will be entitled to compensation or at least rehabilitation under the project. Users of land with title or traditional rights (or who can prove they are legally using the land) who are affected by restricted access to, or use if, the land will be entitled to compensation for land and any assets on the land affected. Users of land who do not have title or traditional rights to land will be provided full compensation for any structures, crops or trees on land affected by the project and if their access to, or use of, the land is affected, will receive rehabilitation for land losses either in form of replacement land (if available) or in form of a cash allowance for land-use loss.
Question 2 - Does compensation apply to my house or structures? Answer: Yes. Houses and any other structures (small shops, animal sheds, etc) that will be affected by the project shall be compensated at replacement cost so that owners can build another structure of the same size and standard.
Question 3 - What about my crops and trees? Answer: Your affected crops and trees will also be compensated at current market value. Compensation for crops will be based on the anticipated harvest at market value, while compensation for trees will be based on the type, age and productivity of each tree affected.
Question 4 - Does the above mean that anybody in your community can claim compensation or rehabilitation? Answer: No. The entitled affected families are only those who where residing in project affected areas and had affected assets at the time the impacts assessment and the affected people census was carried out. The cut-off-date for eligibility for this subproject is 18th August, 2007 when the impact survey and the affected people census were completed. Anybody who encroaches into the area after the cut-off- date will not be entitled to compensation or any other form of resettlement assistance.
Question 5 - Do we need to vacate and clear the affected properties immediately after they have been identified as needed by the project? Answer: No. Clearing the affected areas will only take place after the compensation or rehabilitation for affected land or other lost assets and the appropriate subsidies have been provided to you. After the day in which compensation and rehabilitation was delivered to you, you will then have 1 month to clear the land. If you have not done so after a month the project will be allowed to enter your ex-property and clear the land for you.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Question 6 - If there is any disagreement regarding the way the compensation policy set up in the LARP has been implemented or any other issue relative to the compensation and rehabilitation program for the project do we have the right to complain, and if so how and where? Answer: Yes. Any AH may file a complaint or grievance. AHs will first lodge a complaint with the land acquisition collector and the project implementation unit in D. G. Khan district. If unanswered within 15 days, the complaint can then be lodged to NTDC’s project management unit in Lahore. Finally if the grievance is still not settled within 1 month, the AH can seek redress at the appropriate court. The village administrations and the Land Acquisition Coordination Committee (LACC) composed by senior members of the AH communities and by their elected representatives will assist the AH in these cases. The concerned land acquisition co- ordination committees will properly document all complaints and resolutions. AHs will be exempted from all taxes, administrative and legal fees associated with resolving the dispute.
Question 7 - Who can we contact for more information about the project? Answer: For further information about the project as a whole, and/or the LARP for the New Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject, or if you would like to receive a full copy of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework (LARF: 2006) for the project, please contact as the follows:
NATIONAL TRANSMISSION AND DISPATCH COMPANY Address: WAPDA House, Lahore Phone Number: +92-42-9202414 Contact person: M. Tahir Khan (Manager MTP)
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
APPENDIX 4 – TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR EXTERNAL MONITORING (CONSULTANT/NGO)
The part time consultant will be responsible for the external evaluation of the implementation of the resettlement plan. S/he has the following general tasks: I. To review and verify the progress in resettlement implementation as outlined in the Resettlement Plan/s specific for the project components. II. To assess resettlement efficiency, effectiveness, impacts and sustainability, drawing both on policies and practices and to suggest any corrective measures, if necessary.
A. Specific Tasks
1. Design an appropriate set of indicators for gathering and analyzing information on resettlement impacts; the indicators shall include the following issues:
• Budget and timeframe regarding land acquisition and crop/tree compensations, • Delivery of entitlement packages in a timely and efficient manner, • Satisfaction of affected people on entitlements, compensation, • Satisfaction of AHs with grievance procedures and outcomes, • Socio-economic conditions of the AHs in the post-resettlement period, • Level of satisfaction of AHs in the post resettlement period.
2 Review results of internal monitoring and verify claims through random checking at the field level to assess whether resettlement objectives have been generally met. Involve the AHs and community groups in assessing the impact of resettlement for monitoring and evaluation purposes.
3 Conduct both individual and community level impact analysis through the use of formal and informal surveys, key informant interviews, focus group discussions and community public meeting to assess the impact of resettlement.
4 Identify the strengths and weaknesses of basic resettlement objectives and approaches, implementation strategies, including institutional issues, and provides suggestions for improvements in future resettlement policy making and planning. Directly feedback the results and recommendations to PMU/NTDC and ADB.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007 Pakistan Power Transmission Enhancement Program
B. Qualifications
A local expert can conduct this independent evaluation. The consultant must have at least 5 years experience in project monitoring work and a MA in Social Science. The consultant should have experience in resettlement management and monitoring work in ADB-financed projects.
C. Implementation Schedule and Inputs The expert will be hired for a total period of 30 days for one-time or intermittent input. The expert is expected to conduct one monitoring mission upon completion of the RP implementation and submit a post-completion monitoring and evaluation report to PMU/NTDC and ADB.
D. Reporting Requirements
The monitoring expert will review the status of the RP implementation in light of the targets, budget and duration as outlined in the Resettlement Plan for the hydropower project site. The expert will submit reports to the ADB and PMU/NTDC after each monitoring mission and determine the implementation status and quality of resettlement operations and also assess whether resettlement goals have been achieved. He will suggest suitable recommendations for improvement. The external monitoring expert will prepare a Final Report on the subproject’s LARP monitoring work at the end of the contract period indicating the project performance and lessons learned for future projects of this kind.
LARP Jarwar – Sadiqabad 132 kV Transmission Line Subproject FinalDraft November 2007