GI T Aylor with the Fluid Dynamics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GI T Aylor with the Fluid Dynamics October 25, 1996 11:15 Annual Reviews Frontispiece G. I. Taylor with the fluid dynamics “group” in the courtyard of the Cavendish Laboratory, (Spring 1955). Front row: Tom Ellison, Alan Townsend, Sir Geoffrey Taylor, George Batchelor, Fritz Ursell, Milton Van Dyke. Middle row: S. N. Barua, David Thomas, Bruce Morton, Walter Thompson, Owen Phillips, Freddie Bartholomeusz, Roger Thorne. Back row: Ian Nisbet, Harold Grant, Anne Hawk, Philip Saffman, Bill Wood, Vivian Hutson, Stewart Turner. November 28, 1996 9:23 Annual Reviews chapter-01 AR023-01 Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 1997. 29:1–25 Copyright c 1997 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved G. I. TAYLOR IN HIS LATER YEARS J. S. Turner Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, A. C. T. 0200, Australia INTRODUCTION Much has been written about Sir Geoffrey Ingram Taylor since his death in 1975. The greater part of the published material has been written, or strongly influenced, by Professor G. K. Batchelor, who became closer to G. I. Taylor professionally than anyone else had been during his long career. Batchelor (1976a,b; 1986; 1996) has written the definitive obituaries and biographies and earlier edited the collected works, as well as bringing together the rather sparse writings of Taylor about himself and his style of research. The reader may well ask, as the present author did himself on receiving the invitation to write this article: What can anyone else, with far less direct contact, and that contact extending over a shorter period, add to what has already been provided by the acknowledged authority? On reflection, I came to the conclusion that it would be worth recording another perspective on G. I. Taylor, based on the impressions he made on me and some contemporaries who were students in Cambridge from the mid- 1950s onward. We arrived in Cambridge when he was already formally retired from the Royal Society Yarrow Research Professorship, but still very active in research. An informal group of staff and students had by then grown up around him; the theoreticians were members of the faculty of mathematics and the experimenters were in physics, but all of us occupied various spaces in the Cavendish Laboratory. Some of us were directly supervised by G. I. for a time, or collaborated with him on particular projects. (Henceforth in this article I will refer to G. I. Taylor as “G. I.” as he was called by friends and senior colleagues—students at the time addressed him more formally as “Sir Geoffrey”.) Later, in 1966, I returned to Cambridge as a staff member of the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, which had been established in the interim by George Batchelor (G. K. B.) and contained 1 0066-4189/97/0115-0001$08.00 November 28, 1996 9:23 Annual Reviews chapter-01 AR023-01 2 TURNER a more formal grouping of mathematicians and experimenters working in fluid mechanics. Over this period too, there was the opportunity to observe G. I. and his interactions with those around him. A second reason for deciding to undertake this task was the opportunity it gives to say some of the things about G. K. B. and his relationship with G. I. which George has never recorded himself. It is widely recognized that G. I.’s effectiveness as a scientist, and the immediacy of his influence on many subjects, was greatly increased by the existence of the group which grew up around him. But the group was largely the creation of George. G. I. was always the “presence” who provided the historical continuity, and also a considerable sense of unity through the pride the group felt in having him in its midst, but he would not have had the interest (or the organizational skills) to bring and hold such a group together himself. My recollections of that period have been stimulated and fleshed out by discussions and correspondence over the past two or three years with many who were my contemporaries in Cambridge at that time. Many of the details recorded below, relating to both G. I.’s scientific work and our personal interactions with him, have been supplied by them, without explicit acknowledgement in the text. EARLY INFLUENCES ON G. I. TAYLOR’S STYLE OF RESEARCH I shall begin with a necessarily second hand account of some aspects of G. I.’s life, interests, and accomplishments during his boyhood and as a young man. This is highly selective, but I have attempted to pick out events and qualities contributing to the development of the distinctive style of research which has in retrospect been identified as “the spirit of G. I. Taylor.” To concentrate exclu- sively on the post–World War II years of which I have more direct knowledge would, I feel, give a very incomplete and unsatisfactory picture of G. I. and his work. G. I. came from a talented family; it is well known that his grandfather was George Boole, the originator of symbolic logic, who married Mary Everest, the niece of Sir George Everest after whom the world’s highest peak is named. One of the Boole daughters, Alice, became a self-taught mathematician like her father, another a Professor of Chemistry, and the youngest a writer, whose first novel, published in 1897, had a renewed popularity (especially in the U.S.S.R.) after the Second World War. G. I.’s father was an artist, and he grew up in a supportive home with freedom and encouragement to pursue his varied interests. His formal education began at a preparatory school in Hampstead, and his scientific bent seems to have already been formed while he was there. He and November 28, 1996 9:23 Annual Reviews chapter-01 AR023-01 G. I. TAYLOR 3 his younger brother attended the series of Children’s Christmas Lectures at the Royal Institution given in 1897–98 by Sir Oliver Lodge on “The principles of the electric telegraph.” The brothers were stimulated to construct a Wimshurst machine which they used to make X-ray pictures of the bones in their mother’s hand. At the age of twelve G. I. went on to the University College School in Gower Street. He became particularly interested in mathematics and physics, and later acknowledged the influence of the senior mathematics master there. Over the same period, G. I.’s lifelong love of the sea and of small boats began to grow, perhaps prompted initially by his father’s love of rivers, both as a painter and an oarsman. In his last year at school he designed and built a sailing dinghy in his upstairs bedroom, and (having solved the problem of getting it out of the window and lowering it to the ground) sailed it alone down to the mouth of the Thames and back. G. I. is on record as saying that while he was still at school he discovered a copy of Lamb’s Hydrodynamics in his uncle’s library, “and though I could not understand it I was fascinated by its subject matter and hoped that I would some day be able to use it in understanding the mechanics of sailing boats, a subject in which I was already much interested from the practical point of view.” He sculled and rowed while he was an undergraduate in Cambridge, and as soon as he could afford it he bought the first of a series of sailing yachts. When G. I. himself came to give the Royal Institution Children’s lectures in 1936 he chose the title “Ships.” Family influences of various kinds therefore played a great part in develop- ing G. I.’s mind and interests. In his later years he often made the puzzling statement that he saw himself as continuing the family tradition of the gifted amateur, represented by George Everest, George Boole, and his daughter Alice. In conversation it became clear that by this he did not mean to imply an unpro- fessional approach to the work accomplished, but he was stressing instead the image of a relatively untrained person who worked independently and alone for pleasure. He himself was of course far from untrained, but the last two attributes are evident in all his work—he liked doing things himself or with one collaborator or assistant, and he certainly gained enormous pleasure from doing so. In making that statement about the amateur tradition, G. I. probably also had in mind the fact that he continued throughout his life to work with the relatively simple tools he had learned early in his career, rather than mastering new techniques. His unique fresh and original approach more than compen- sated for any lack of new technical skills. In the volume commemorating G. I.’s seventieth birthday, R. V. Southwell (1956) wrote: “From whatever source de- rived, there have always been blended in G. I. the mathematician’s power of abstruse thought and the artist’s gift of perception. Few mathematicians seem to be perceptive—their minds are much too absorbed: G. I., had he felt the November 28, 1996 9:23 Annual Reviews chapter-01 AR023-01 4 TURNER urge, might have gained a different fame as a field botanist ever quick to note the beautiful and the rare.” G. I. Taylor was awarded a scholarship by Trinity College, and entered Cambridge University in 1905 to study mathematics. He obtained first-class honors in part I of the Mathematical Tripos in 1907 (he was 22nd in his year) and went on to take part II of the Natural Sciences Tripos in physics the next year, again obtaining a first and also a major scholarship at Trinity which allowed him to stay on to do research.
Recommended publications
  • Modelling Vortex-Vortex and Vortex-Boundary Interaction
    Modelling vortex-vortex and vortex-boundary interaction Rhodri Burnett Nelson DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SUPERVISOR Prof. N. R. McDonald September 2009 I, Rhodri Burnett Nelson, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. SIGNED Abstract The motion of two-dimensional inviscid, incompressible fluid with regions of constant vorticity is studied for three classes of geophysically motivated problem. First, equilibria consisting of point vortices located near a vorticity interface generated by a shear flow are found analytically in the linear (small-amplitude) limit and then numerically for the fully nonlinear problem. The equilibria considered are mainly periodic in nature and it is found that an array of equilibrium shapes exist. Numerical equilibria agree well with those predicted by linear theory when the amplitude of the waves at the interface is small. The next problem considered is the time-dependent interaction of a point vortex with a single vorticity jump separating regions of opposite signed vorticity on the surface of a sphere. Initially, small amplitude interfacial waves are generated where linear theory is applicable. It is found that a point vortex in a region of same signed vorticity initially moves away from the interface and a point vortex in a region of opposite signed vortex moves towards it. Configurations with weak vortices sufficiently far from the interface then undergo meridional oscillation whilst precessing about the sphere. A vortex at a pole in a region of same sign vorticity is a stable equilibrium whereas in a region of opposite-signed vorticity it is an unstable equilibrium.
    [Show full text]
  • Alwyn C. Scott
    the frontiers collection the frontiers collection Series Editors: A.C. Elitzur M.P. Silverman J. Tuszynski R. Vaas H.D. Zeh The books in this collection are devoted to challenging and open problems at the forefront of modern science, including related philosophical debates. In contrast to typical research monographs, however, they strive to present their topics in a manner accessible also to scientifically literate non-specialists wishing to gain insight into the deeper implications and fascinating questions involved. Taken as a whole, the series reflects the need for a fundamental and interdisciplinary approach to modern science. Furthermore, it is intended to encourage active scientists in all areas to ponder over important and perhaps controversial issues beyond their own speciality. Extending from quantum physics and relativity to entropy, consciousness and complex systems – the Frontiers Collection will inspire readers to push back the frontiers of their own knowledge. Other Recent Titles The Thermodynamic Machinery of Life By M. Kurzynski The Emerging Physics of Consciousness Edited by J. A. Tuszynski Weak Links Stabilizers of Complex Systems from Proteins to Social Networks By P. Csermely Quantum Mechanics at the Crossroads New Perspectives from History, Philosophy and Physics Edited by J. Evans, A.S. Thorndike Particle Metaphysics A Critical Account of Subatomic Reality By B. Falkenburg The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time By H.D. Zeh Asymmetry: The Foundation of Information By S.J. Muller Mindful Universe Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer By H. Stapp Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition By M. Schlosshauer For a complete list of titles in The Frontiers Collection, see back of book Alwyn C.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology Bulletin
    d 7I THE DEAN OF SCIEN<C OCT 171972 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BULLETIN REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT 1971 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BULLETIN REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 1970-1971 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BULLETIN VOLUME 107, NUMBER 2, SEPTEMBER, 1972 Published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 MassachusettsAvenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts, five times yearly in October, November, March, June, and September Second class postage paid at Boston, Massachusetts. Issues of the Bulletin include REPORT OF THE TREASURER REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT SUMMER SESSION CATALOGUE PUBLICATIONS AND THESES and GENERAL CATALOGUE Send undeliverable copies and changes of address to Room 5-133 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge,Massachusetts 02139. THE CORPORATION Honorary Chairman:James R. Killian, Jr. Chairman:Howard W. Johnson President:Jerome B. Wiesner Chancellor: Paul E. Gray Vice Presidentand Treasurer:Joseph J. Snyder Secretary:John J. Wilson LIFE MEMBERS Bradley Dewey, Vannevai Bush, James M. Barker, Thomas C. Desmond, Marshall B. Dalton, Donald F. Carpenter, Thomas D. Cabot, Crawford H. Greenewalt, Lloyd D. Brace, William A. Coolidge, Robert C. Sprague, Charles A. Thomas, David A. Shepard, George J. Leness, Edward J. Hanley, Cecil H. Green, John J. Wilson, Gilbert M. Roddy, James B. Fisk, George P. Gardner, Jr., Robert C. Gunness, Russell DeYoung, William Webster, William B. Murphy, Laurance S. Rockefeller, Uncas A. Whitaker, Julius A. Stratton, Luis A. Ferr6, Semon E. Knudsen, Robert B. Semple, Ir6n6e du Pont, Jr., Eugene McDermott, James R. Killian, Jr. MEMBERS Albert H. Bowker, George P. Edmonds, Ralph F. Gow, Donald A. Holden, H. I. Romnes, William E.
    [Show full text]
  • George Batchelor and the Founding of Euromech
    J. Fluid Mech. (2021), vol. 914, A1, doi:10.1017/jfm.2020.569 https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.569 . George Batchelor and the founding of Euromech Patrick Huerre† Laboratoire d’Hydrodynamique – LadHyX, CNRS – Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, F-91128 Palaiseau, France https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms (Received 20 March 2020; revised 20 May 2020; accepted 7 July 2020) This article shows how George Batchelor, in close collaboration with Dietrich Küchemann, succeeded in founding Euromech, the European Mechanics Committee, in the sixties during the rise of the ‘Cold War’. It is argued that the initial success of Euromech was due to the organisation of Euromech Colloquia, i.e. meetings of at most 50 scientists, focussing on a sufficiently specialised topic and leaving ample time for informal discussions. The maturation of Euromech into the European Mechanics Society in the nineties is then analysed. This transition was in part made necessary by the creation of five series of large European Conferences in Fluid and Solid Mechanics, Turbulence, Nonlinear Oscillations and Mechanics of Materials. The collective action of George Batchelor and a , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at few outstanding European scientists is brought to light. Key words: turbulent flows 24 Sep 2021 at 09:00:16 1. Introduction , on Over the last fifty years the European Mechanics Society, commonly referred to as Euromech, has succeeded in bringing together the community of European scientists engaged in fundamental and applied research in Mechanics. This process came about 170.106.33.19 through the decisive steps and initiatives taken collectively by a few outstanding personalities among whom the Australian-born George Batchelor emerged as a natural benevolent leader.
    [Show full text]
  • Qian [Tsien] Jian at the State Key Laboratory of Turbulence, Peking University, China, 09 November 1997
    Qian [Tsien] Jian at the State Key Laboratory of Turbulence, Peking University, China, 09 November 1997. 1 Qian Jian (1939–2018) and His Contribution to Small-Scale Turbulence Studies John Z. Shi* State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1954 Hua Shan Road, Shanghai 200030, China *[email protected] Abstract Qian [Tsien] Jian (1939–2018), a Chinese theoretical physicist and fluid dynamicist, devoted the second part of his scientific life to the physical understanding of small-scale turbulence to the exclusion of all else. To place Qian’s contribution in an appropriate position in the field of small-scale turbulence, a historical overview and a state-of-the art review are attempted. Qian developed his own statistical theory of small-scale turbulence, based on the Liouville (1853) equation and a perturbation variational approach to non-equilibrium statistical mechanics, which is compatible with the Kolmogorov–Oboukhov energy spectrum. Qian’s statistical theory of small-scale turbulence, which appears mathematically and physically valid, successfully led to his contributions to (i) the closure problem of turbulence; (ii) one- dimensional turbulence; (iii) two-dimensional turbulence; (iv) the turbulent passive scalar field; (v) the cascade model of turbulence; (vi) the universal equilibrium range of turbulence; (vii) a simple model of the bump phenomenon; (viii) universal constants of turbulence; (ix) the intermittency of turbulence; and perhaps most importantly, (x) the effect of the Taylor microscale Reynolds number (푅휆) on both the width of the inertial range of finite 푅휆 turbulence and the scaling exponents of velocity structure functions.
    [Show full text]
  • NUS-IMPRINT 9.Indd
    ISSUE 9 Newsletter of Institute for Mathematical Sciences, NUS 2006 Keith Moffatt: Magnetohydrodynamic Attraction >>> He has been a visiting professor at the Ecole Polytechnique, Palaisseau,(1992–99), Blaise Pascal Professor at the Ecole Normale Superieure, Paris (2001–2003), and Leverhulme Emeritus Professor (2004–5). He has served as Editor of the Journal of Fluid Mechanics and as President of the International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (IUTAM). For his scientific achievements, he was awarded the Smiths Prize, Panetti-Ferrari Prize and Gold Medal, Euromech Prize for Fluid Mechanics, Senior Whitehead Prize of the London Mathematical Society and Hughes Medal of the Royal Society. He also received the following honors: Fellow of the Royal Society, Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Member of Academia Europeae, Fellow of the American Physical Society, and Officier des Palmes Académiques. He was elected Foreign Member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Académie des Sciences, Paris, and Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Rome. Keith Moffatt He has published well over 100 research papers and a research monograph Magnetic Field Generation in Interview of Keith Moffatt by Y.K. Leong ([email protected]) Electrically Conducting Fluids (CUP 1978). Although retired from the Newton Institute, he continues to engage in research Keith Moffatt has, in a long and distinguished career, made and to serve the scientific community. In particular, he is 18 important contributions to fluid mechanics in general and a founding member of the Scientific Advisory Board (SAB), to magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in particular. His which has helped our Institute (IMS) to find its direction scientific achievements are matched by his organizational during the crucial first five years and establish itself on the and administrative skills, which he devoted most recently international scene.
    [Show full text]
  • George Keith Batchelor. 8 March 1920 − 30 March 2000
    Downloaded from rsbm.royalsocietypublishing.org on November 7, 2013 George Keith Batchelor. 8 March 1920 − 30 March 2000 H.K. Moffatt Biogr. Mems Fell. R. Soc. 2002 48, doi: 10.1098/rsbm.2002.0002, published 1 December 2002 Supplementary data "Data Supplement" http://rsbm.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/suppl/2009/04/24/48.0.25.DC1.html Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top Email alerting service right-hand corner of the article or click here To subscribe to Biogr. Mems Fell. R. Soc. go to: http://rsbm.royalsocietypublishing.org/subscriptions Batchelor for press 9/12/02 10:24 am Page 25 GEORGE KEITH BATCHELOR 8 March 1920 — 30 March 2000 Biogr. Mems Fell. R. Soc. Lond. 48, 25–41 (2002) Batchelor for press 9/12/02 10:24 am Page 26 Batchelor for press 9/12/02 10:24 am Page 27 GEORGE KEITH BATCHELOR 8 March 1920 — 30 March 2000 Elected F.R.S. 1957 BY H.K. MOFFATT, F.R.S. Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, The University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK George Batchelor was a pioneering figure in two branches of fluid dynamics: turbulence, in which he became a world leader over the 15 years from 1945 to 1960; and suspension mechan- ics (or ‘microhydrodynamics’), which developed under his initial impetus and continuing guidance throughout the 1970s and 1980s. He also exerted great influence in establishing a universally admired standard of publication in fluid dynamics through his role as founder Editor of the Journal of Fluid Mechanics, the leading journal of the subject, which he edited continuously over four decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Davidson P.A., Kaneda Y., Moffatt K., Sreenivasan K.R. (Eds.) A
    This page intentionally left blank A Voyage Through Turbulence Turbulence is widely recognized as one of the outstanding problems of the physical sciences, but it still remains only partially understood despite having attracted the sustained efforts of many leading scientists for well over a century. In A Voyage Through Turbulence, we are transported through a crucial period of the history of the subject via biographies of twelve of its great personalities, starting with Osborne Reynolds and his pioneering work of the 1880s. This book will provide absorbing reading for every scientist, mathematician and engineer interested in the history and culture of turbulence, as background to the intense challenges that this universal phenomenon still presents. A Voyage Through Turbulence Edited by PETER A. DAVIDSON University of Cambridge YUKIO KANEDA Nagoya University KEITH MOFFATT University of Cambridge KATEPALLI R. SREENIVASAN New York University cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo, Delhi, Tokyo, Mexico City Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521198684 C Cambridge University Press 2011 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2011 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data A voyage through turbulence / [edited by] P.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Fluid Mechanics
    ! Comptes Rendus Mécanique Volume 345, Issue 7, July 2017, Pages 498-504 ! A century of fluid mechanics: 1870–1970 / Un siècle de mécanique des fluides : 1870–1970 The early years of the Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Style and international impact Presented by François Charru . Author links open the author workspace. H. KeithMoffatt Opens the author workspace Show more https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2017.05.007 Get rights and content Abstract The origins of the Journal of Fluid Mechanics, of which the first volume was published in 1956, are discussed, with reference to editorial correspondence during the early years of the Journal. This paper is based on a lecture given at the colloquium: A Century of Fluid Mechanics, 1870– 1970, IMFT, Toulouse, France, 19–21 October 2016. Keywords Fluid mechanics History Publication 1. Introduction A history of fluid mechanics must rely primarily on written evidence, whether in the form of printed sources or surviving correspondence. But recent history may also rely to some extent on the memories, however fallible, of those who were involved in the events described. One important historic event that falls within the century 1870–1970 on which we are asked to focus at this meeting was the creation in 1956 of the Journal of Fluid Mechanics, or briefly JFM, widely recognised now as the leading international journal covering fluid mechanics in all its aspects. The achievement of the founding Editor, George Keith Batchelor, was of great importance for the subsequent development of our subject. I was privileged to become a research student in 1958 at Trinity College, Cambridge, under Batchelor's guidance; I took my PhD in 1962, and had been recruited by him even a year earlier to help with copy-editing for the Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • George Keith Batchelor's Interaction with Chinese Fluid Dynamicists And
    Notes Rec. doi:10.1098/rsnr.2019.0034 Published online GEORGE KEITH BATCHELOR’S INTERACTION WITH CHINESE FLUID DYNAMICISTS AND INSPIRATIONAL INFLUENCE: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE by JOHN Z. SHI* State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1954 Hua Shan Road, Shanghai 200030, China G. K. Batchelor Laboratory, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK Currently visiting: Emmanuel College Cambridge, St Andrew’s Street, Cambridge CB2 3AP, UK George Keith Batchelor (1920–2000, FRS 1957) was a towering figure in the twentieth century international fluid mechanics community. Much has been written about him since his death. This article presents an account of Batchelor’s early interactions and relationships with Chinese fluid dynamicists and his continuing inspirational influence on them, which have not yet been documented in English. The theory of homogeneous turbulence, to which Batchelor contributed greatly, has had both indirect and direct inspirational influence on generations of Chinese fluid dynamicists, as they have sought to make their own contributions. Batchelor made visits to China in 1980 and 1983. His first ice-breaking trip to China in April 1980 is of special importance to Sino-British fluid mechanics and to China, even though Batchelor did not speak about turbulence but instead about his more recent research interest, microhydrodynamics. Batchelor’s philosophical view of applied mathematics (fluid mechanics)—that ‘You have got to inject some physical thinking as well as mathematical thinking’—has had great inspirational influence on generations of fluid dynamicists in the UK, in China, and around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey Through Turbulence
    A Journey Through Turbulence P. Davidson, Y. Kaneda, H.K. Moffatt, K.R. Sreenivasan Contents List of contributors page vii 1 Osborne Reynolds: a Turbulent Life 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Professorial Career 11 1.3 End piece 31 References 37 2 Prandtl and the Gottingen¨ School 40 2.1 Introduction 40 2.2 The Boundary Layer Concept, 1904–1914 42 2.3 A Working Program for a Theory of Turbulence 47 2.4 Skin friction and turbulence I: the 1/7th law 53 2.5 The mixing length approach 54 2.6 Skin friction and turbulence II: the logarithmic law and beyond 57 2.7 Fully Developed Turbulence I: 1932 to 1937 62 2.8 Fully Developed Turbulence II: 1938 68 2.9 Fully Developed Turbulence III: 1939 to 1945 75 2.10 Prandtl’s Two Manuscripts on Turbulence, 1944–1945 78 2.11 Conclusion 90 References 93 3 Theodore von Karm´ an´ 101 3.1 Introduction 101 3.2 The logarithmic law of the wall 103 3.3 Isotropic turbulence 109 3.4 Epilogue 123 References 124 iii iv Contents 4 G.I. Taylor: The Inspiration behind the Cambridge School 127 4.1 Opening remarks 127 4.2 Brief chronological account, focusing mostly on scientific career 131 4.3 Ideas originated in the period 1915–1921 134 4.4 The intervening period 141 4.5 Ideas explored in the period 1935–1940 143 4.6 A window into Taylor’s personality through his corre- spondence 153 4.7 Some reflections 168 References 178 5 Lewis Fry Richardson 187 5.1 Introduction 187 5.2 The 4/3 law 190 5.3 Richardson Cascade and Numerical Weather Prediction 199 5.4 Fractal Dimension 204 5.5 Conclusions 206 References 207 6 The Russian School
    [Show full text]
  • G.K. Batchelor and the Homogenization of Turbulence
    21 Nov 2001 9:10 AR AR151-02.tex AR151-02.SGM ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GJC Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2002. 34:19–35 Copyright c 2002 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved G.K. BATCHELOR AND THE HOMOGENIZATION OF TURBULENCE H.K. Moffatt Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9EW, United Kingdom; e-mail: [email protected] Key Words homogeneous turbulence, passive scalar problem, Kolmogorov theory, turbulent diffusion ■ Abstract This essay is based on the G.K. Batchelor Memorial Lecture that I delivered in May 2000 at the Institute for Theoretical Physics (ITP), Santa Barbara, where two parallel programs on Turbulence and Astrophysical Turbulence were in progress. It focuses on George Batchelor’s major contributions to the theory of turbu- lence, particularly during the postwar years when the emphasis was on the statistical theory of homogeneous turbulence. In all, his contributions span the period 1946–1992 and are for the most part concerned with the Kolmogorov theory of the small scales of motion, the decay of homogeneous turbulence, turbulent diffusion of a passive scalar field, magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, rapid distortion theory, two-dimensional tur- bulence, and buoyancy-driven turbulence. 1. INTRODUCTION George Batchelor (1920–2000) (see Figure 1) was undoubtedly one of the great by Cambridge University on 09/15/13. For personal use only. figures of fluid dynamics of the twentieth century. His contributions to two major areas of the subject, turbulence and low-Reynolds-number microhydrodynamics, were of seminal quality and have had a lasting impact. At the same time, he Annu.
    [Show full text]