A Study of the Ford Motor Company

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Study of the Ford Motor Company Business Value Group LLC A Study of the Ford Motor Co Turnaround 2010 Keys : Quotes from Participants Key message or take-away Business Value Group LLC Patrick Hehir, September 2010 It is said that a man is not defined by his challenges in life but rather by his response to them. The same could be said of communities and organizations, including public companies. During the deep global recession of 2008, a myriad of companies and industries in the USA struggled to survive. Although it has been recently announced that the recession is over, its effects persist and there is significant fear that there will be a second recession that will hit late 2010 and into 2011. Given the stubbornly high level of unemployment, some even suggest that the U.S. may in fact be in a depression. During this time, our key financial and automotive business sectors ended up needing U.S. government aid to help them navigate through the toughest patch of the downturn. However there was a notable exception within the US auto industry, ONE company that never asked for or received any direct monies from the government, and that was The Ford Motor Company. Having never asked for or taken a dollar of support from the US government, Ford reported a profit of $2.7 Billion on January 29 ,2010, for fiscal year 2009, after having had a loss of $14.6B in 2008.1 This was Ford’s largest pretax operating profit in six years. “The company also outsold GM in February 2010, something that had not happened in more than 50 years, aside from several months in 1998 when GM workers were on strike.”2 In April Ford reported a profit of $2.1 Billion for quarter one of 2010 a big reversal from year ago period where it had a loss of $1.4 Billion. It was Ford's fourth straight positive quarter and its highest quarterly profit in six years.3 In July 2010, Ford reported earnings of $2.6 billion for the second quarter and expected to have more cash than debt by the end of 2011. It was the fifth consecutive quarterly profit for Ford, which had continually increased its market share for 22 out of the previous 23 months. It had this success even as the government stimulus programs were expiring and while consumers had continued nagging fears about an overall further global slowdown. Ford also expected to be profitable in the second half of 2010 and to deliver even stronger results in 2011. Profits in the second half of 2010 were expected to be less than the $4.7 billion it earned in the first half of the fiscal year but that was due to the cyclical nature of their business. At the bottom of its business results trough on Nov 19th 2008, Ford stock reached a low of $1.26 a share (not the only company to bottom around this time). At time of writing its stock price has recovered to the $12 range. Remarkably, over the period from 2005 to 2010, Ford’s stock price has actually outperformed Toyota in overall % gain. These results are all the more impressive when one considers that GM, Chrysler and even Toyota (with quality issues relating to accelerator pedals,) were floundering in the marketplace due to this 1 Nick Bunkley NY Times article Jan 29th 2010 2 FORD MOTOR COMPANY NY Times article July 23 2010 3 DEARBORN, Mich. (AP) April 27th 2010 ©BVG Intl LLC Saratoga, CA,USA 2 of 18 [email protected] www.BVGINTL.com Phone +1-408-904-8195 unprecedented economic downturn. Ford’s performance, at a time when the total available US market shrank by close to 40%, from 16 - 17 Million unit sales to less than 10 Million unit sales (with similar reductions in most developed countries), is nothing short of amazing. Given these results so far, there is value in taking a closer look to learn what contributed to such a dramatic turnaround. Those closest to the real action, the employees and contractors that worked through the whole change process, were asked to assess the turnaround from their perspective. An anonymous survey targeted the 2000+ strong Ford network within professional networking site Linked-In. These constituents were made up of employees, contractors and retirees that had a ring side seat to what was going on internally within Ford. Using the online survey tool called Survey Monkey participants were asked the following 5 questions: 1. In your opinion, when did the work begin within Ford that resulted in its current success? 2. What are the Top 3 contributing factors to Ford Motor Co’s recent success? 3. What are the 3 things that you believe will be key to ensuring that Ford continues its current run of success? 4. What can other US multinationals learn from what Ford has recently achieved? 5. When you think back, did anything Ford do impede or have an adverse impact on how successful the company has become or could become? If so, what was done and what impact did it have? Disclosure: This survey was conducted purely on a voluntary basis and all participants were notified that the survey was to be used as a source of input for a subsequent company analysis and report. The team that conducted the analysis have had no direct recent professional involvement in the automotive industry and in particular none with Ford Motor Co. Neither was the analysis contracted by any third party. It is purely an attempt to have an objective assessment as to the factors that contributed to the recent success of Ford, as seen through the eyes of some of the internal stakeholders during this recent downturn. An attempt was made to analyze, summarize and report on some of the logical conclusions in order that the greater business community may learn from this legendary brand’s performance in the global marketplace. Admittedly this analysis omits stakeholders such as Customers, Investors, Suppliers and Executive Management, whose input would be interesting and valuable. This is not the first time that the Ford Motor Co was studied by industry practitioners. Toyota Motor Co studied and modeled many of their business practices on Ford, after the early visits and study by the famous Toyota engineer Taichi Ono in the 1930’s. It may be time for others to learn once again from Ford. ©BVG Intl LLC Saratoga, CA,USA 3 of 18 [email protected] www.BVGINTL.com Phone +1-408-904-8195 Population Representation: The survey respondents came from a significantly diverse set of functional departments, giving this study a broad range of perspectives. Summary of the responses to each 1. In your opinion, when did the work begin within Ford that resulted in its current success? Notable quotes: The quality work began after Jac Nasser left Work started in the mid 1990's Dates from Alan Mulally joining the company The past 10 years Alan Mulally being hired ©BVG Intl LLC Saratoga, CA,USA 4 of 18 [email protected] www.BVGINTL.com Phone +1-408-904-8195 Interpretive Conclusion: The majority of the respondents (56%) felt the work began 5 years before hand or earlier. However there seemed to be very strong sentiment, as will be reflected throughout the study, that a lot revolved around the hiring of Mr. Alan Mulally in 2006. Participants also frequently credited Mr. Bill Ford for his courage in initiating the process, finding and hiring Mr. Mulally, and granting him the responsibility and freedom to implement change. Question 2 2. What are the Top 3 contributing factors to Ford Motor Co’s recent success? Product Line Up 15% Product Quality 13% Apparent Alan Mulally 10% Foundational Financing 9% Elements Global Standardization & Glob Products 9% New One Ford Culture 6% Downsizing/Consolidation 4% Cost reductions 4% Global Prod Dev System 4% Focus and Discipline 3% Other 24% ©BVG Intl LLC Saratoga, CA,USA 5 of 18 [email protected] www.BVGINTL.com Phone +1-408-904-8195 Notable quotes: New focus on building cars that people want Improved car designs (make cars that people want) FOCUSING ON CORE FORD PRODUCTS Go out and separate or sell businesses not Ford Oval related (Hertz, Visteon, Aston Martin, Jaguar,etc) True quality mindset ("no excuses") Enforcement of no release of bad products by ALL in the production process Focus on excellent product Improved customer loyalty through improved quality Signing on Alan Mulally Bill Ford trusting Mulally to run the place Alan Mulally's disciplined approach to management of a global enterprise Alan Mulally (fresh view, willingness to change the culture, willing to make hard decisions, no blinders on) Refinancing before the credit crunch Securing $28 billion in 2006 by company collateral deal Cash to weather the storm Cash Flow Management Not taking the bailout Leveraging / going toward global products -- develop / engineer one Focus for the entire world (with regional modifications to meet market requirements) instead of 4+ Focus variants (one in each region) Leveraging common platforms: reduce unique platforms and try to produce as many different vehicles off one platform as possible (requires a long term strategy / vision) Consistent Global Processes The leadership of Alan Mulally creating a culture change at his level A new cultural paradigm of teamwork at the top led by a talented and experienced CEO Open Communication and exposure of Issues - Nassar built a CYA environment that drove issues under cover Interpretive Conclusion: The responses to this question were exceptionally rich, and took considerable time to distill and summarize. They reveal that managing a complex business with multiple interdependent functions takes quite a significant effort.
Recommended publications
  • Ford: the Evolution of Automobiles, Components, and Design
    Ford: The Evolution of Automobiles, Components, and Design Honors Project In fulfillment of the Requirements for The Esther G. Maynor Honors College University of North Carolina at Pembroke By Janelle Horton Department of Mathematics and Computer Science 04/26/2016 -/ (_,•('"•*"•"-* y^y '.'riJ*'-'-f "^ xf^nelle Horton// Date //-•'Honors Cc Charles Lillie, Ph.D. Date Faculty Mentor Teagan Decker, Ph.D. Date Senior Project Coordinator Acknowledgments I would like to show my greatest appreciation to the assistant professor of the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Professor Charles Lillie. Not only for agreeing to be my mentor throughout my honors senior project, but for also suggesting valid points to make within my essay and final PowerPoint presentation that would better my research. I appreciate Professor Lillie for taking the time out of his schedule to meet with me during his office hours to discuss ideas and interesting facts that would be essential to crafting my essay. I would also like to recognize my cousin Neleze Meadows for helping me in narrowing down my broad topic to solely focusing on the evolution of Ford auto-motives. My cousin helped me chose an automobile company that has had the biggest transformation from beginning to end, and is continuously still growing in the 21st century. With the help of both my mentor Professor Lillie and my cousin Neleze Meadows, once again thank you for your input towards devising my Honors Mayor College senior project. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nine Things I Learned from Alan Mulally Bryce G
    Nine Things I Learned from Alan Mulally Bryce G. Hoffman ChangeThis | 93.01 In the summer of 2010, I decided to take a year off from my job as a journalist with The Detroit News to write a book about one of the most amazing comebacks in business history: the turnaround of Ford Motor Company. As the Ford beat reporter for the News, I had covered every twist and turn of that epic drama. I knew that this story was about much more than saving a car company. It was a roadmap for changing cultures. When Alan Mulally arrived in Dearborn in September 2006, he knew little about the automobile industry. However, he had already figured out how to take a dysfunctional organization that was being ripped apart by managerial infighting and turn it into a model of collaboration and effi- ciency. Mulally had proven that at the Boeing Company, where he was credited with saving the commercial aircraft division from a series of catastrophes ranging from the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, that had cost Boeing most of its business. But Mulally’s biggest accomplishment in Seattle was saving Boeing from itself. Now Bill Ford Jr. was asking him to do the same thing with Ford. It was a daunting task. Ford—the company that put the world on wheels—was on the verge of bankruptcy. For decades, it had been fighting a losing battle against foreign automakers that not only made better cars, but also did so more efficiently and at substantially lower cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Technologyquarterly September 3Rd 2011
    Artifi cial muscles Brainwave control: Marc Andreessen’s challenge motors sci-fi no longer second act TechnologyQuarterly September 3rd 2011 Changes in the air The emerging technologies that will defi ne the future of fl ight TQCOV-September4-2011.indd 1 22/08/2011 15:42 2 Monitor The Economist Technology Quarterly September 3rd 2011 Contents On the cover From lightweight components and drag-reducing paint today, to holographic entertainment systems and hypersonic aircraft tomorrow, researchers are devising the emerging technologies that will dene the future of ight. What can tomorrow’s Cameras get cleverer travellers expect? Page 10 Monitor 2 Computational photography, a new approach to desalination, monitoring yacht performance, spotting fakes with lasers, guiding nanoparticles to ght Consumer electronics: New approaches to photography treat it as a branch of cancer, mopping up oil with wool, smaller military drones, computing as well as optics, making possible a range of new tricks keeping barnacles at bay and HOTOGRAPHY can trace its roots to dierent exposures, into one picture of the religious overtones of Pthe camera obscura, the optical princi- superior quality. Where a single snap may computing programming ples of which were understood as early as miss out on detail in the lightest and dar- the 5th century BC. Latin for a darkened kest areas, an HDR image of the same Dierence engine chamber, it was just that: a shrouded box scene looks preternaturally well lit (see 9 Worrying about wireless or room with a pinhole at one end above). HDR used to be a specialised Concerns about the health risks through which light from the outside was technique employed mostly by profes- of mobile phones are misplaced projected onto a screen inside, displaying sionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Capabilities for Mass Market Innovations in Emerging Economies
    Capabilities for Mass Market Innovations in Emerging Economies Rifat Sharmelly MSc, B.IT (Hons.) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The UNSW Business School (School of Management), The University of New South Wales, Sydney Australia 2016 ORIGINALITY STATEMENT ‘I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.’ Signed ……………………………………………........... Date ……………………………………………............... 2 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ‘I hereby grant the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. I also authorise University Microfilms to use the 350 word abstract of my thesis in Dissertation Abstract International (this is applicable to doctoral theses only).
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report1
    University of Pennsylvania Masthead Logo ScholarlyCommons TTCSP Global Go To Think aT nk Index Reports Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) 1-2019 2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report James G. McGann University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks Part of the International and Area Studies Commons McGann, James G., "2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report" (2019). TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports. 16. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/16 2019 Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the University of Pennsylvania, Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program. All requests, questions and comments should be sent to: James G. McGann, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, International Studies Director, Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania Email: [email protected] This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/16 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report Abstract The Thinka T nks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) of the Lauder Institute at the University of Pennsylvania conducts research on the role policy institutes play in governments and civil societies around the world. Often referred to as the “think tanks’ think tank,” TTCSP examines the evolving role and character of public policy research organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Forward 2006 Annual Report
    Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company / 2006 Annual Report Fast Forward 2006 www.ford.com Annual Fast Forward Ford Motor Company • One American Road • Dearborn, Michigan 48126 Report cover printer spreads_V2.indd 1 3/14/07 7:41:56 PM About the Company Global Overview* Ford Motor Company is transforming itself to be more globally integrated and customer-driven in the fiercely competitive world market of the 21st century. Our goal is to build more of the products that satisfy the wants and needs of our customers. We are working as a single worldwide team to improve our cost structure, raise our Automotive Core and Affi liate Brands quality and accelerate our product development process to deliver more exciting new vehicles faster. Featured on the front and back cover of this report is one of those vehicles, the 2007 Ford Edge. Ford Motor Company, a global industry leader based in Dearborn, Michigan, manufactures or distributes automobiles in 200 markets across six continents. With more than Dealers 9,480 dealers 1,515 dealers 1,971 dealers 125 dealers 871 dealers 2,352 dealers 1,376 dealers 6,011 dealers and 280,000 employees and more than 100 plants worldwide, the company’s core and affiliated Markets 116 markets 33 markets 25 markets 27 markets 64 markets 102 markets 138 markets 136 markets automotive brands include Ford, Jaguar, Land Rover, Lincoln, Mercury, Volvo, Aston Martin Retail 5,539,455 130,685 188,579 7,000 74,953 428,780 193,640 1,297,966** and Mazda. The company provides financial services through Ford Motor Credit Company.
    [Show full text]
  • 1-30-2018 2017 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report
    University of Pennsylvania Scholarly Commons TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) 1-30-2018 2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report James G. McGann University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks Part of the International and Area Studies Commons McGann, James G., "2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report" (2017).TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports. 2018 Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the University of Pennsylvania, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program. All requests, questions and comments should be sent to: James G. McGann, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, International Studies Director Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania Telephone: (215) 746-2928 Email: [email protected] 2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report Abstract Background on the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) of the Lauder Institute at the University of Pennsylvania conducts research on the role policy institutes play in governments and civil societies around the world. Often referred to as the “think tanks’ think tank,” TTCSP examines the evolving role and character of public policy research organizations. Over the last 26 years, the TTCSP has developed and led a series of global initiatives that have helped bridge the gap between knowledge and policy in critical policy areas such as international peace and security, globalization and governance, international economics, environmental issues, information and society, poverty alleviation, and healthcare and global health.
    [Show full text]
  • AN AUTONEWS 05-26-08 a 54 AUTONEWS.Qxd
    AN AUTONEWS 05-26-08 A 54 AUTONEWS 5/23/2008 4:05 PM Page 1 54 • MAY 26, 2008 Top North America-based automotive CEOs, ranked by 2007 total compensation Captains of industry Retirement pay Blue = supplier; Green = automaker; Red = dealership group 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 deferred Name (age) 2007 2006 2007 bonus & incentive stock option stock award 2007 accumulated compensation Rank title Company total compensation total compensation base salary plan compensation gains gains other pension benefits balance 1 Alexander Cutler (56) Eaton $24,545,516 $14,303,055 $1,069,305 $9,520,197 $11,910,433 $1,820,803 $224,778 $12,842,426 $60,074,535 chairman, president & CEO 2 John Plant (54) TRW Automotive 22,670,224 12,954,324 1,594,167 3,904,000 14,329,500 2,459,110 383,447 39,256,900 614,163 president & CEO 3 Robert Keegan (60) Goodyear Tire & Rubber 18,763,103 11,470,710 1,176,667 12,300,000 5,204,113 0 82,323 11,509,825 642,761 chairman, president & CEO 4 Christopher Kearney (53) SPX 14,936,872 6,119,213 1,000,000 2,500,000 6,023,174 4,842,804 570,894 7,698,910 3,373,713 chairman, president & CEO 5 Theodore Solso (61) Cummins 13,223,409 12,238,722 1,110,000 6,274,000 0 5,691,000 148,409 17,635,689 5,493,879 president & CEO 6 Siegfried Wolf (49) Magna International* 12,686,685 4,422,180 100,000 9,467,000 2,897,880 N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan R. Mulally
    Alan R. Mulally Former Executive Vice President, The Boeing Company Former President and CEO, Boeing Commercial Airplanes Retired President and CEO, Ford Motor Company Board of Directors, Google Mercer Island, Washington For leadership in the creation, design, development, and manufacture of commercial airplanes, exemplified by the Boeing 777. Alan Mulally is an AIAA Honorary Fellow, a past President of AIAA, a member of the Board of Directors at Google, former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Ford Motor Company, former President and Chief Executive Officer of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, former Executive Vice President of The Boeing Company, and former President of Boeing Information, Space & Defense. Joining The Boeing Company in 1969, Mulally contributed to a wide range of Boeing airliners including the 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777 and 787 airliners. Mulally supported the design of the cockpits for both the 757 and the 767 airliners, transitioning them from the familiar analogue systems to digital systems and creating the “glass cockpit,” which is now the industry standard. On the 777 project Mulally served as the Director of Engineering and later as the Vice- President and General Manager of the program. Boeing promoted Mulally to Senior Vice President of Engineering for its commercial airline group in 1994. Subsequent promotions followed until 1998 when he was made President of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, with CEO duties added in 2001. Mulally became President and CEO of the Ford Motor Company in 2006. Mulally led Ford’s transformation into one of the world’s leading automobile companies and the #1 automobile brand in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Rtist Sigurður Guðmundsson Is a Man of the World. Living in China And
    www.grapevine.is THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO LIFE, TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT IN ICELAND IN THE ISSUE Issue 14 • 2010 • September 10 - 23 COMPLETE+ CITY LISTINGS - INSIDE! ENTREPRENEURS ECONOMICS DINING MUSIC TRAVEL Tales from Angry reader Grapevine The mash-up The Icelandic Riviera the start-ups responds, surveys soup movement meets is not where calls us commies Iceland you expect rtist Sigurður Guðmundsson is a man of the world. Living in China and mostly operating out of Holland, A he has had an unusually busy year in Iceland, along with exhibitions, unveilings and publications he even made the cover of the Grapevine. Now, find out about his adventures in Vietnam. The Reykjavík Grapevine Issue 14 — 2010 The Reykjavík GRapevine Hafnarstræti 15, 101 Reykjavík 2 www.grapevine.is [email protected] Editorial | Sveinn Birkir Björnsson Published by Fröken ehf. www.froken.is Member of the Icelandic Travel Industry Association www.saf.is Printed by Landsprent ehf. in 25.000 copies. Look Who's Back! ediToR: Due to a series of unfortunate circumstances, S. Magnússon has set for this publication. Without Haukur S Magnússon / [email protected] acTinG ediToR: I have been called upon in this hour of need to her, this issue would probably not have seen the Sveinn Birkir Björnsson / [email protected] briefly (and somewhat triumphantly) edit this is- light of day. ediToRial: sue of the Reykjavík Grapevine. It has been a There have been changes to the Icelandic +354 540 3600 / [email protected] pleasure to return to my old post as editor of the society since I left my regular position as editor advertisinG: +354 540 3605 / [email protected] Grapevine, filling in for the vacationing Haukur S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford) Compared with Japanese (Honda) Automotive Industry: Their Strategies Affecting Surviabilty
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU ETD Archive 2010 A Major Study of American (Ford) Compared with Japanese (Honda) Automotive Industry: Their Strategies Affecting Surviabilty Patrick F. Callihan Cleveland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/etdarchive Part of the Engineering Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Callihan, Patrick F., "A Major Study of American (Ford) Compared with Japanese (Honda) Automotive Industry: Their Strategies Affecting Surviabilty" (2010). ETD Archive. 49. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/etdarchive/49 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in ETD Archive by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A MAJOR STUDY OF AMERICAN (FORD) COMPARED WITH JAPANESE (HONDA) AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY – THEIR STRATEGIES AFFECTING SURVIABILTY PATRICK F. CALLIHAN Bachelor of Engineering in Material Science Youngstown State University June 1993 Master of Science in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Youngstown State University March 2000 Submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF ENGINEERING at the CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY AUGUST, 2010 This Dissertation has been approved for the Department of MECHANICAL ENGINEERING and the College of Graduate Studies by Dr. L. Ken Keys, Dissertation Committee Chairperson Date Department of Mechanical Engineering Dr. Paul A. Bosela Date Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Dr. Bahman Ghorashi Date Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Dean of Fenn College of Engineering Dr. Chien-Hua Lin Date Department Computer and Information Science Dr. Hanz Richter Date Department of Mechanical Engineering ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Mulally and the Fight to Save Ford Motor Company Free
    FREE AMERICAN ICON: ALAN MULALLY AND THE FIGHT TO SAVE FORD MOTOR COMPANY PDF Bryce G. Hoffman | 304 pages | 15 Feb 2013 | Random House USA Inc | 9780307886064 | English | New York, United States American Icon: Alan Mulally and the Fight to Save Ford Motor Company by Bryce G. Hoffman Look Inside. At the end ofFord Motor Company was just months away from running out of cash. With the auto industry careening toward ruin, Congress offered American Icon: Alan Mulally and the Fight to Save Ford Motor Company three Detroit automakers a bailout. General Motors and Chrysler grabbed the taxpayer lifeline, but Ford decided to save itself. As the rest of Detroit collapsed, Ford went from the brink of bankruptcy to being the most profitable automaker in the world. American Icon is the compelling, behind-the-scenes account of that epic turnaround. He spent countless American Icon: Alan Mulally and the Fight to Save Ford Motor Company with Alan Mulally, Bill Ford, the Ford family, former executives, labor leaders, and American Icon: Alan Mulally and the Fight to Save Ford Motor Company directors. HOFFMAN is a bestselling author, speaker and consultant who helps companies around the world plan better and leaders around the world lead better by applying innovative systems from the worlds of business and the military. Before launching his… More about Bryce G. American Icon is a story of leadership that offers valuable lessons for organizations of all sizes. Highly recommend! It features the transformation from a top-down style of leadership to that of a coach led by CEO Alan Mulally whose focus is the team, the team, the team.
    [Show full text]